Metamemory Questionnaire Research Articles

Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire: a comparison of young and older adults

ABSTRACT The Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ; Troyer & Rich, [2002]. Psychometric properties of a new metamemory questionnaire for older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(1), P19–P27) is a widely used measure of subjective memory consisting of three scales: Satisfaction, Ability, and Strategies. Although subjective memory complaints are prevalent across different age groups, the factor structure and psychometric properties of the MMQ have yet to be examined in young adults. Here, we independently replicated the original MMQ factor structure in N = 408 young adults (YA) recruited from undergraduate courses and N = 327 older adults (OA) and, for the first time, assessed the age-invariance of the scale using measurement invariance testing. YAs made significantly higher ratings than OAs on MMQ-Satisfaction and MMQ-Strategies, indicating greater satisfaction with their memory and greater use of strategies, but the groups were similar on MMQ-Ability. The original MMQ factor structure was replicated in OAs but not in YAs, and age invariance was not supported. Future studies seeking to compare young and older adults could therefore consider either requesting modification of the MMQ for use with young adults or using a different scale.

Qualidade de vida e metamemória em estudantes do nível superior durante a pandemia da COVID-19

ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the quality of life and metamemory and verify their predictors in students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: a cross-sectional survey carried out through online collection with the application of an initial questionnaire to characterize the sample, the WHOQOL-brief to investigate the quality of life, and the Metamemory Questionnaire in Adults (short version) - MIAr to evaluate metamemory in a group of undergraduate and postgraduate students. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Multiple linear regression was performed to verify the predictor variables. A significance level of 5% (p ≤ 0.05) was considered. Results: 977 university students participated in the study, the majority (70.73%) of whom were females and with an income range below three minimum wages (63.56%). For quality of life, income range, being in the risk group for COVID-19, and age were predictors for both the undergraduate and postgraduate groups. In contrast, on an excellent metamemory, the predictors were male gender and age. Conclusion: for students, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the main predictor of quality of life was having a higher income bracket, and the main predictor of metamemory was being a male.

11 The Psychometric Characteristics of a Novel Metamemory Questionnaire for Children

Objective:Metamemory is a component of metacognition that includes both the knowledge of factors that affect memory (i.e., declarative metamemory) and knowledge and application of factors in one's own learning and recall performance (i.e., procedural metamemory; Kreutzer et al., 1975). Previous researchers have examined children's metamemory through interviews and found that metamemory abilities are positively associated with age and performance on memory measures (see Godfrey et al., 2022 for review). However, there is not yet a standardized measure to evaluate children's metamemory. The current study aimed to examine the psychometric characteristics of a declarative metamemory questionnaire, the Measure of Metamemory (MoM-10), for children ages 6-12 years old. Based on previous research, we hypothesized that performance on the MoM-10 would not be associated with sex but would be positively associated with age and learning and memory performance.Participants and Methods:A total of 75 English-speaking typically developing children between the ages of 6 to 12 years old were recruited for the current study (M age=9.1+1.92; females 49%). Participants completed the MoM-10 which assessed declarative metamemory via 10 multiple choice questions (accuracy score of 0 or 1 points per question) and required participants to provide an explanation for their multiple-choice answer (explanation score of 0, 1, or 2 points per question). The metamemory questionnaire provided two outcome variables: an Accuracy score of 10 possible points, and an Explanation score of 20 possible points. Additionally, participants completed a 3-trial pictorial learning/memory task which provided an Immediate Recall score and Delayed Recall score.Results:As hypothesized, there were no sex differences on the MoM-10 Accuracy scores (t(73)=0.71, p=0.48) or Explanation scores (t(73)=-73, p=0.47). Consistent with our hypothesis, age was significantly associated with Accuracy (r=0.31, p<0.01) and Explanation scores (r=0.79, p<0.001). Internal consistency of the MOM-10 was moderate for the Explanation score (Cronbach's alpha=0.68) and low for the Accuracy score (KR-20=0.54). Lastly, after controlling for age, participants' MoM-10 Accuracy score was significantly associated with Immediate Recall (r=0.32, p<0.01) on the learning/memory task and the Explanation scores were significantly associated with the Immediate Recall (r=0.36, p<0.01) and Delayed Recall scores (r=0.32, p<0.01) on the learning/memory task.Conclusions:The current study presents an initial review of psychometric properties of a metamemory questionnaire for children ages 6 to 12 years old. Additionally, as hypothesized, these results suggest the MOM-10 performance is significantly positively associated with participants' age and immediate and delayed recall performance on a pictorial learning/memory task. These associations provide lines of evidence for convergent validity given the expected maturation of metamemory with both age and with improvements in actual memory performance. However, based on the low internal consistency of the accuracy scores, further refinement will be explored including possibly rephrasing questions from the current item set or perhaps excluding current items in future use of the scale.

40 Metamemory performance of children with ADHD in comparison to typically developing children.

Objective:Metamemory is an aspect of metacognition that is one's knowledge of memory and understanding of their own memory performance (Kreutzer et al., 1975). Executive function skills are foundational skills required for the development of metamemory in early school-age children (Lockl & Schneider, 2007; Lecce et al., 2015). Previous studies have suggested children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) may have weaker study and organizational strategies, suggesting weaker metamemory skills (O'Neill & Douglas, 1991; Voelker et al., 1989). The current study aimed to examine the metamemory knowledge of typically developing (TD) children and children with ADHD on a novel declarative metamemory questionnaire. We hypothesized that the ADHD group would have worse metamemory performance than the TD group and that executive functioning skills would be significantly associated with metamemory for all groups.Participants and Methods:The current study recruited a total of 93 English-speaking children between the ages of 6 to 12 years old, including 70 typically developing (TD) children (M age=9.1+1.92; females 49%), and 23 children with diagnoses of ADHD (M age=9.56+1.27; females 57%). Fifty-seven percent of the ADHD group reported daily use of stimulant medication, but no participants took medication on the day of testing. The participant groups did not significantly differ regarding age or sex. Participants completed the Measure of Metamemory (MoM-10) which included 10 multiple choice questions (i.e., Accuracy) and asked participants to explain their multiple-choice answer (i.e., Explanation). This provided three scores: Accuracy (max 10 points), Explanation (max 20 points), and Total (max 30 points). Additionally, participants' parents completed the 12-item Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, 2nd Edition (BRIEF-2) Screening form, evaluating the child's executive functioning, which provided a percentile based on age and sex.Results:Within the ADHD group, BRIEF-2 percentiles and MoM-10 scores did not differ between those who were medicated and those who were not. As previous literature has shown, the TD and ADHD groups significantly differed on the BRIEF-2 screening score percentiles (t(91)=-5.78, p<0.001; TD M=52.89+26.1; ADHD M=85.26+13.82). The TD and ADHD groups did not significantly differ on either the MoM-10 Accuracy (p=0.13; TD M=7.22+1.84; ADHD M=7.87+1.32), the Explanation (p=0.08; TD M=9.34+3.80; ADHD M=10.57+2.92), or Total (p=0.13). There was a trend towards a significant correlation between the Explanation scores and BRIEF-2 for TD participants (r=-0.23, p=0.06), but there was no significant correlation between Explanation, Accuracy, or Total scores and the BRIEF-2 for the ADHD group.Conclusions:Our results tentatively suggest a possible association between metamemory and parent reported executive functioning for TD children, supporting the expected association between the development of executive functioning and the development of metamemory. However, there was no association between metamemory and executive functioning for children with ADHD, likely due to the restricted range of executive functioning scores for this group (i.e., M=85.25+13.82; Range 55-99). Additionally, metamemory did not significantly differ between diagnostic groups. Children with ADHD may have comparable metamemory knowledge to TD children as a result of executive functioning instruction and support they have received. Rather, there may be group differences in the application of metamemory judgement and strategies.

12 The Development of a Pediatric Metamemory Questionnaire and Scoring Procedure

Objective:To create a standardized scoring procedure to evaluate open-ended responses as part of a novel questionnaire (Measure of Metamemory; MoM) designed to assess declarative metamemory in youth. Metamemory is an aspect of metacognition that is one’s knowledge of the factors related to storage and retrieval of information (Flavell 1971; Kreutzer et al., 1975), and includes both declarative metamemory (i.e., one’s knowledge about factors influencing memory) and procedural metamemory (i.e., one’s understanding of their own memory performance).Participants and Methods:Fourteen short vignettes related to memory were administered to 100 participants (age 6-12) with questions such as, “Two children hear a story they must remember. The first person is 5 years old. The second person is 12 years old. Who is most likely to remember it best?” After answering, they were then prompted to explain their answer (i.e., “Why?”) and their responses were recorded verbatim. To develop standardized and objective criteria for each of the 14 open-ended responses, responses from a subsample of 20 youth were collectively examined by the study team and a scoring structure similar to open-ended items on common intelligence tests (e.g., WISC-V/WAIS-IV) was created. Two points (full credit) were awarded for complete and thorough understanding of memory processes related to the question; 1 point was given for partially accurate or incomplete understanding of the related memory process; and 0 points for an inability to correctly express an understanding of relevant memory concepts. This scoring guide was then applied independently by each of the six raters to an additional 25 participants (ages 6-12 mean age (SD)). To assess the interrater reliability of this 3-point ordinal scoring system, we examined both Fleiss’ kappa and 2-way random-effects, single-rater, absolute agreement Intra-Class Correlations (ICC).Results:Across the six independent raters, reliability coefficients for each of the 14 items ranged from (Fleiss') k =. 277 to .792 (ICC ranged from .481 to .880). Of these 14 items, the kappa value was classified (using interpretation rules for Cohen’s kappa) as “substantial” for 10 items, “moderate” for 3 items, and “fair” for 1 item. Based on these lower inter-rater reliabilities, two items were subsequently removed from the measure to create the 12-item open-ended measure of metamemory, the MoM-12, with reliable scoring for youth as young as 6 years old.Conclusions:A consensus process established a quantifiable scoring procedure to assess open-ended responses related to youth’s knowledge of memory (e.g., metamemory). Reliability metrics identified acceptable interrater reliabilities in 12 of the 14 original items. Further examination of psychometric properties, including internal consistency and lines of evidence for validity is needed. The successful crafting of a scoring procedure is a first step towards developing a psychometrically sound measure (the MoM) to evaluate and study metamemory concepts objectively and reliably in youth.

Metamemory in older adults, preliminary results of a multifactorial training program

AbstractBackgroundCognitive intervention is a broad field that uses different means to increase or maintain these capacities. One of the aspects worked in memory training interventions refers to beliefs about performance, control and aging beliefs regarding this function in old age. More favorable beliefs towards memory in old age, performance capacity and greater self‐perceived control are related to successful aging and feelings of well‐being. The aim of the present study is to evaluate memory and aging beliefs in older adults who took part in a memory training program and a control group of subjects belonging to the same age group.MethodDesign: Comparative, pre‐post, longitudinal intervention study. Community dwelling older adults over 60 years. Memory training program participants (n = 58) (M = 70,04 years old; ds = 8.07 years) and controls (n = 72) (M = 69.92 years old; ds = 7.31 years) were assed at the begging and the end of the program. Instruments: Questionnaire of Social Demographic Data (built ad hoc), Brief Neuropsychological assessment for memory and attention. Metacognition: Memory Control Capacity Inventory (MCI) and ‐Metamemory Questionnaire. Procedure: All the participants of the Intervention group took part in the Memory training program. The program has a duration of 8 sessions of 90 minutes each, where theoretical and practical tools are provided to improve cognitive performance in everyday life Program participants and controls were assed twice, with eight weeks of difference between the first and second evaluation.ResultResults reveal that when comparing the groups, statistically significant differences can be observed in favor of memory program participants in the following aspects: Metamemory beliefs: satisfaction(z = ‐3,376 p = .001), Metamemory capacity z = (‐2.32‐ p = .050) Metamemory Strategy (z = ‐4.556‐ p = .000), total metamemory beliefs (z = 4.620‐ p = .000) and in aging beliefs, in the aspect :aging independence concerns (z = ‐2.526 p = .000).ConclusionIt is of great significance the incorporation of the assessment, training and observation of meta‐memory beliefs together with cognitive assessment and cognitive training in memory programs for older adults. The inclusion of cognitive training is an approach that can help cognitively vulnerable older adults and promote healthy cognitive aging.

The role of metamemory and personality in episodic memory performance in older adults

This study newly investigated the joint contribution of metamemory and personality (traits and facets) in explaining episodic memory (EM) performance in typically aging older adults. Forty-eight participants (age range: 64–75 years) completed a self-paced word list (SPWL) recall task, a metamemory questionnaire assessing perceived control and potential improvement (PCPI) and self-efficacy and satisfaction (SESA) regarding one’s mental abilities (e.g., memory), and the Big-Five Questionnaire. Based on the SPWL encoding strategies reported, participants were then classified as effective (N = 20) or ineffective (N = 28) memory strategy users. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that a better SPWL performance was predicted by higher levels of PCPI, Scrupulousness and Dominance personality facets. Effective memory strategy users, then, showed higher SPWL performance and Dominance (Energy facet) than ineffective ones. These findings suggest that both specific metamemory processes and personality facets predict better EM performance in older adults. Moreover, personality dispositions relating to Dominance seem to characterize individuals adopting effective memory strategies to support EM performance. These results represent first evidence of the role of both metamemory and personality—facets—in explaining older adults’ EM performance, which should thus be considered when assessing or training EM in old age.

Hearing loss, hearing aid use, and subjective memory complaints: Results of the HUNT study in Norway.

This study aimed to explore the association between hearing loss severity, hearing aid use, and subjective memory complaints in a large cross-sectional study in Norway. Data were drawn from the fourth wave of the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4 Hearing, 2017-2019). The hearing threshold was defined as the pure-tone average of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz in the better ear. The participants were divided into five groups: normal hearing or slight/mild/moderate/severe hearing loss. Subjective self-reported short-term and long-term memory complaints were measured by the nine-item Meta-Memory Questionnaire (MMQ). The sample included 20,092 individuals (11,675 women, mean age 58.3 years) who completed both hearing and MMQ tasks. A multivariate analysis of variance (adjusted for covariates of age, sex, education, and health cofounders) was used to evaluate the association between hearing status and hearing aid use (in the hearing-impaired groups) and long-term and short-term subjective memory complaints. A multivariate analysis of variance, followed by univariate ANOVA and pairwise comparisons, showed that hearing loss was associated only with more long-term subjective memory complaints and not with short-term subjective memory complaints. In the hearing-impaired groups, the univariate main effect of hearing aid use was only observed for subjective long-term memory complaints and not for subjective short-term memory complaints. Similarly, the univariate interaction of hearing aid use and hearing status was significant for subjective long-term memory complaints and not for subjective short-term memory complaints. Pairwise comparisons, however, revealed no significant differences between hearing loss groups with respect to subjective long-term complaints. This cross-sectional study indicates an association between hearing loss and subjective long-term memory complaints but not with subjective short-term memory complaints. In addition, an interaction between hearing status and hearing aid use for subjective long-term memory complaints was observed in hearing-impaired groups, which calls for future research to examine the effects of hearing aid use on different memory systems.

Development and validation of a metamemory maturity questionnaire in the context of English as a foreign language

To determine the inherent components of language learners’ capacity for metamemory maturity, the researchers drafted a metamemory maturity (MMM) questionnaire based on Hultsch et al.’s (Memory self-knowledge and self-efficacy in the aged, Springer-Verlag 65–92, 1988) model. The volunteer participants were a heterogeneous sample of 356 male and female English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers and student teachers with various age ranges, teaching experiences, and educational backgrounds. Through a series of factor analytic procedures and structural equation modeling, the final draft of the questionnaire with 30 binary Likert-scale items was validated. Statistics confirmed acceptable measures of internal consistency as well as convergent and discriminant validity. The newly designed MMM questionnaire consisted of three main components of memory strategy use (12 items), memory attentiveness (6 items), memory factual awareness (6 items), and a moderator component of confidence and affect (6 items). The researchers highlight the implications of this questionnaire to provide the teachers with an instrument to analyze the needs of EFL learners for metamemory enhancement strategies.

The Role of Metacognition, Metamemory and Meta-emotion in Predicting Students' Self-directed Learning

The aim of this research was determine the role of metacognition, metamemory and meta-emotion in predicting students' self-directed learning. The research method was cross-sectional from type of correlation. The research population was all high school students of Urmia city in the 2019-2020 academic years. The research sample was 400 students who were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling method. The research tools were the O'Neill & Abedi metacognition inventory (1996), Troyer & Rich metamemory questionnaire (2002), Mitmansgruber & et al meta-emotion questionnaire (2009) and Fisher & et al self-directed learning scale (2001). Data were analyzed by Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regression with enter model methods in SPSS-19 software. The findings showed that metacognition, metamemory and positive meta-emotion had a positive and significant relationship with self-directed learning and negative meta-emotion had a negative and significant relationship with self-directed learning. Also, the variables of metacognition, metamemory and meta-emotion significantly could predicted 40.8 percent of variance of students' self-directed learning and in this predicting the role of metamemory was higher than other variables (p < 0.01). According to the results of the present study, to improve students' self-directed learning, can be designed programs to increase metacognition, metamemory and positive meta-emotion and decrease negative meta-emotion and implement them through workshops.

Subjective working memory predicts objective memory in cognitively normal aging: a HUNT study

BackgroundRecent studies have shown that subjective memory is multi-, rather than uni-dimensional, in line with the results of objective memory tests. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is an association between aspects of memory measured by the subjective Meta-Memory Questionnaire (MMQ) and aspects of memory measured by the objective Wechsler Memory Scale-III (WMS-III) and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS-III) tests in cognitively normal older adults.MethodThe study subjects (n = 106) were cognitively normal, were aged 57–89 years and had participated in the third wave of the North-Trøndelag Health survey (HUNT3). All subjects had completed the MMQ, the WMS-III and the WAIS-III. Previous results from the MMQ (measured as the total MMQ score; the Component I score, related to long-term explicit declarative memory; and the Component II score, related to working/short-term memory) were compared with objective results from WMS-III (Logical Memory) and WAIS-III (Vocabulary and Letter-Number Sequencing) subtests. We conducted linear regression analyses with each objective memory test result as the dependent variable, and subjective memory measures and demographics as independent variables, as well as analyses of MMQ items vs. objective memory.ResultsSubjective working memory impairment (Component II) was significant related to poor performance in objective episodic memory, according to correlation and regression analyses with demographic covariates. In contrast, ratings of impaired subjective declarative memory (Component I) were not related to poor objective memory performance.ConclusionsSpecific aspects of subjective memory related differentially to performance in specific objective memory tests. Clinicians and researchers might consider targeting working memory aspects of subjective memory tests, when seeking an estimate of objective memory performance.

Eyewitness metamemory predicts identification performance in biased and unbiased line‐ups

PurposeDistinguishing accurate from inaccurate identifications is a challenging issue in the criminal justice system, especially for biased police line‐ups. That is because biased line‐ups undermine the diagnostic value of accuracy post‐dictors such as confidence and decision time. Here, we aimed to test general and eyewitness‐specific self‐ratings of memory capacity as potential estimators of identification performance that are unaffected by line‐up bias.MethodsParticipants (N = 744) completed a metamemory assessment consisting of the Multifactorial Metamemory Questionnaire and the Eyewitness Metamemory Scale and took part in a standard eyewitness paradigm. Following the presentation of a mock‐crime video, they viewed either biased or unbiased line‐ups.ResultsSelf‐ratings of discontentment with eyewitness memory ability were indicative of identification accuracy for both biased and unbiased line‐ups. Participants who scored low on eyewitness metamemory factors also displayed a stronger confidence–accuracy calibration than those who scored high.ConclusionsThese results suggest a promising role for self‐ratings of memory capacity in the evaluation of eyewitness identifications, while also advancing theory on self‐assessments for different memory systems.

Subjective working and declarative memory in dementia and normal aging.

Subjective memory complaints are common in both elderly individuals and patients with dementia. This study investigated the power of subjective memory, divided into declarative and working memory, to differentiate between patients with dementia and normal elderly individuals. Two groups of participants, patients with dementia (n=117) and normal elderly individuals (n=117), individually matched with regard to age, gender, and education. All subjects had participated in the third wave of the HUNT population health survey in Nord-Trøndelag County in Norway and completed the Meta-Memory Questionnaire (MMQ) in the HUNT study. The MMQ was subdivided into two components, one associated with declarative memory (episodic and semantic) and the other with working memory. Patients with dementia reported significantly more subjective memory concerns than normal elderly individuals. The difference between working and declarative memory components was significantly greater in patients with dementia than in normal elderly individuals. This finding made it possible to differentiate patients with dementia from the normal elderly individuals. Mental and somatic health conditions did not significantly add power to differentiating the two groups. In clinical and research applications, subjective memory components could contribute to differentiation of patients with dementia and normal elderly individuals by using self-reported impairment in working memory, rather than declarative memory.

The Impact of Metamemory on the EFL Students` Achievement at Taif University

The purpose of the current research is to scrutinize the relationship between metamemory and EFL learners` achievement. The participants were 250 first year university students who were chosen from a large sample of the preparatory year Science and Humanities streams at Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia. The objective of the research is twofold: (a) to assess whether metamemory can predict English language skills achievement (listening, speaking, reading, and writing, and (b) to assess if there exist notable discrepancies between male and female students and the different academic streams (the science stream and the humanities stream) on the metamemory factors. Students` metamemory was measured by the Metamemory questionnaire (SMSQ) of Tonkovic and Vranic (2011). The results of this study show that metamemory is a good predictor of the EFL students` language learning skills achievement. It also indicates that there are differences between male and female students on the metamemory factors in favor of females. Furthermore, the findings reaffirm that there are differences between the academic streams, in favor of the science stream.

Spontaneous strategy use in children with autism spectrum disorder: the roles of metamemory and language skills.

Metamemory, or beliefs about one’s own memory capabilities, knowing what you know, and knowing what you don’t know, has frequently been linked to the spontaneous use of rehearsal strategies in typically developing children. However, limited research has investigated mnemonic strategy use, metamemory, or the relationship between these two cognitive processes in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). The current study examined the relative strength of metamemory knowledge and language skills as predictors of rehearsal use and memory performance in individuals with ASD. Twenty-one children with ASD and 21 children in a combined comparison group were matched on chronological and verbal mental age. Over two sessions, participants completed a serial recall task, a language measure, and a metamemory questionnaire. Children were classified as rehearsers/non-rehearsers based on behavioral observations and/or verbal reports of strategy use. As expected from previous research, the comparison group had a significantly higher proportion of rehearsers than the ASD group. However, spontaneous rehearsers performed significantly better on the serial recall task than non-rehearsers, regardless of group membership. Children in the comparison group had a higher mean total score on the metamemory questionnaire than the ASD group. However, when examined by rehearsal use, participants classified as rehearsers, regardless of diagnostic group, scored significantly higher on the metamemory questionnaire than non-rehearsers. Finally, across groups, hierarchical regression analyses identified both metamemory and language proficiency as significant predictors of rehearsal strategy use. The fact that the predictors showed the same relationship across the comparison group and the ASD group implies that metamemory and language proficiency, while separate entities, are both fundamental underlying skills contributing to the emergence of rehearsal strategies, and that the results are likely generalizable to other populations with developmental challenges.

Memory Self-Efficacy Beliefs Modulate Brain Activity when Encoding Real-World Future Intentions

BackgroundWhile the use of different cognitive strategies when encoding episodic memory information has been extensively investigated, modulation of brain activity by memory self-efficacy beliefs has not been studied yet.Methodology/Principal FindingsSixteen young adults completed the prospective and retrospective metamemory questionnaire, providing individual subjective judgments of everyday memory function. The day after, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, the participants had to memorize real-world intentions (e.g., return a book to the library), which were performed later on in a virtual environment. Participants also performed offline cognitive tasks evaluating executive functions, working memory, and attention. During encoding, activity was found in medial temporal lobe, left prefrontal cortex, medial parietal regions, occipital areas, and regions involved in (pre)motor processes. Based on results from the questionnaire, the group was split into low and high memory self-efficacy believers. Comparison of encoding-related brain activity between the 2 groups revealed that the low memory self-efficacy believers activated more the hippocampus bilaterally, right posterior parahippocampal cortex, precuneus, and left lateral temporal cortex. By contrast, more activity was found in dorsal anterior cingulate gyrus for the high-memory believers. In addition, the low-memory believers performed more poorly at feature binding and (at trend) manipulating visuospatial information in working memory.Conclusion/SignificanceOverall, these findings indicate that memory self-efficacy beliefs modulate brain activity during intentional encoding. Low memory self-efficacy believers activated more brain areas involved in visuospatial operations such as the hippocampus. Possibly, this increase reflects attempts to compensate for poor performance of certain neurocognitive processes, such as feature binding. By contrast, high-memory believers seemed to rely more on executive-like processes involved in cognitive control.

Metamemory in Aging: a Correlation between Judgments of Learning and Factors of Metamemory Questionnaire

Metamemory in Aging: a Correlation between Judgments of Learning and Factors of Metamemory Questionnaire

Self-evaluation of memory systems: Development of the questionnaire

Objectives: The term metamemory refers to the knowledge one has about the development and use of memory in general, and one's own memory processes in particular. The current theoretical perspective on memory processes is best described by the memory systems framework which represents a useful tool in specifying different ‘kinds’ of memory. We present here the Self-evaluation of Memory Systems Questionnaire (SMSQ), which assesses the multidimensional construct of metamemory based on the memory systems framework. Method: SMSQ has been developed on a large and heterogeneous sample (N = 3088) via both, web-based and paper-and-pencil form. With the aim of increasing its general utility, we used items referring to situations or materials which are highly likely for everyone to have encountered during their everyday life. Results: Analyses revealed good content validity, factorial validity, internal consistency reliability, and construct validity in terms of expected theoretical group differences. SMSQ is represented by six distinct factors: subjective evaluation, episodic memory, semantic memory, memory for numbers, visuospatial memory, and reminder and aids. Age differences found on SMSQ between young and old adults confirm the well-established empirical findings on the memory and aging. Conclusion: SMSQ is a brief, easily administrable, multidimensional metamemory questionnaire, marked with the sound background from the findings on memory systems and cognitive aging.

Meta-memória e auto-eficácia: um estudo de validação de instrumentos de pesquisa sobre memória e envelhecimento

The cognitive aging literature documents in numerous studies the existence of significant age differences between younger and older adults in tests of episodic memory. Researchers have been investigating possible explanations for such differences. One hypothesis being tested is whether older adults hold different perceptions, attitudes and feelings towards memory that could affect performance negatively. Metamemory and self-efficacy are concepts that have been used in the test of this hypothesis. In the present research, a metamemory questionnaire (MIA), a self-efficacy questionnaire (MSEQ) and 4 versions of 2 episodic memory tasks (4 grocery lists and 4 short stories) were translated into Portuguese, adapted to Brazilian culture and submitted to validity testing with 33 younger and 27 older healthy Brazilian adults. The results from the analyses suggest that the Portuguese versions of these instruments have good psychometric characteristics and seem promising for research in this field in Brazil.

Memory perception and strategy use in Parkinson's disease

Although there is growing support for the existence of memory deficits within Parkinson's disease (PD), little has been done to evaluate the extent to which PD patients demonstrate differences in their use of metacognitive strategies. In the present study, 79 PD patients (46 men and 33 women) and 49 age-matched healthy participants (19 men and 30 women) were compared on a metamemory questionnaire. PD patients reported significantly less strategy-use than age-matched controls, particularly with regards to external memory strategies (such as making lists). This suggests that auxiliary treatments such as memory strategy training might be effective in this population.