Metal Brackets Research Articles

An in vitro study of orthodontic brackets bonded to transition dental zirconia: Shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index, and surface irregularities

Orthodontic treatment often involves bonding brackets to teeth, and the protocols for natural enamel differ from those for prosthodontically restored teeth. With the rising number of adult orthodontic patients, many present with zirconia crowns. This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded to transition dental zirconia, which combines 3Y-TZP and 5Y-TZP powders. Ninety zirconia substrates were divided into three groups (n=30) based on transition zirconia brands (3M ESPE Lava™ Plus, Cercon® ht ML, and Katana™ Zirconia UTML) and bonded with ceramic brackets (CHIC Ceramic Roth Maxillary and Symetri Clear) using 3M™ Transbond™ XT. A control group used traditional zirconia and metal brackets. Surface treatments included 50-micron aluminium oxide abrasion and Z-Prime™ Plus application. SBS was tested post-thermocycling. Adhesive Resin Index (ARI) was scored and surface roughness was evaluated pre- and post-bonding. Group 1 (3M ESPE Lava™ Plus with CHIC Ceramic Roth Maxillary brackets) had a significantly lower SBS (mean 13.27MPa) compared to the other groups, which all had SBS values above 18.80MPa (P≤.023). Group 2 (3M ESPE Lava™ Plus with Symetri™ Clear) demonstrated a significantly higher mean ARI compared to the control group (Cercon® XT with Victory Series™ Roth), (P=.027). Additionally, significant changes in surface roughness were observed in Groups B (Cercon® ht ML) (P=.008) and C (Katana™ Zirconia UTML) (P=.016). This study determined that the shear bond strength of various transitional zirconia substrates with ceramic brackets exceeded the clinically acceptable SBS levels. The combination of 3M ESPE Lava™ Plus and Symetri™ Clear exhibited significant variation in ARI. Additionally, significant surface irregularities were observed in 3M ESPE Lava™ Plus and Cercon® ht ML following air abrasion, compared to other transitional zirconia brands.

Effect of different surface conditioning methods and low pH solutions on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to newly introduced CAD/CAM materials

AimTo evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic and metallic orthodontic brackets bonded to lithium disilicate ceramics or hybrid ceramics and subjected to different surface conditioning treatments. Materials and methodsIn total, 300 specimens were fabricated from GC LiSi (lithium disilicate) and GC Cerasmart (hybrid) ceramic blocks. The specimens were divided into four groups according to the following surface treatments: hydrofluoric acid (HF); sandblasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide; Monobond Etch and Prime; and erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er-YAG) laser. Metal (Victory Series) and ceramic (Clarity) brackets were bonded using an orthodontic adhesive resin (Transbond XT; 3M Unitek, CA, USA). The specimens were then stored in three different mediums (artificial saliva, mouth rinse, and gastric juice) and thermocycled. An SBS test was performed after 1 week. The surface morphology was examined after the conditioning treatments using a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, t-test, and Duncan test. ResultsThe SBS data revealed that the type of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) block and surface conditioning method significantly affected the SBS. The highest SBS was recorded (10.112 MPa) for the HF-treated hybrid ceramic blocks stored in the saliva medium, while the lowest SBS (1.862 MPa) was reported for the Er-YAG laser-treated lithium disilicate ceramic blocks stored in the gastric juice medium. GC Cerasmart exhibited better bond strength than that of GC LiSi; however, no significant difference was observed between the ceramic and metal brackets. ConclusionThe CAD/CAM material, surface conditioning method, and medium affect the SBS.

The Effect of Three Metal Oxide Nanocoatings on the Frictional Resistance of Superelastic Orthodontic Archwires: A Comprehensive In vitro Analysis.

To evaluate and compare the impact of nanocoatings made of oxides of Aluminum, Titanium, and Zirconium, on the frictional resistance on three types of superelastic orthodontics archwires namely; nickel titanium, copper nickel titanium and low hysteresis nickel titanium. There are120 archwire segments of equal dimensions were divided into four groups (n = 30) with 10 samples each of low hysteresis superelastic archwires; NiTi archwires and CuNiTi archwires. While group A were uncoated, other groups were nanocoated with group B: Aluminum oxide; group C: Titanium dioxide; group D: Zirconium oxide respectively. Upper premolar metal brackets MBT 0.022 slot were used for testing. The frictional properties of the archwires were measured using a Universal testing machine equipped with a custom-made jig. Statistical tests including analysis of variance and post hoctests were used for analysis. The least frictional resistance among the three types of archwires was seen with low hysteresis(L&H) NiTi wires coated with ZrO2 (3.1253 ± 0.45822 N) and the highest with uncoated CuNiTi archwires (7.1113 ± 1.29031 N). Among the nanocoatings, the least value was found for ZrO2 nanocoatings followed by TiO2, Al2O3 and highest with uncoated archwires across all three types of archwires. Low hysteresisNiTi have the least frictional resistance compared to CuNiTi and NiTi archwires. The findings also suggest that all the three metal oxide nanocoatings reduce frictional resistance significantly, among which, ZrO2 nanocoatings were the most effective. This study underscores the potential efficacy of metal oxide nanocoatings in reducing archwire friction and, consequently, will improve orthodontic treatment efficiency and patient comfort. How to cite this article: Dilip S, Rajkumar K. The Effect of Three Metal Oxide Nanocoatings on the Frictional Resistance of Superelastic Orthodontic Archwires: A Comprehensive In vitro Analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(7):649-655.

Effectiveness of high-frequency vibration, cotton rolls and elastomeric wafers in alleviating debonding pain of orthodontic metal brackets: a randomized clinical trial

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different pain mitigation methods during orthodontic debonding and to evaluate pain sensitivity across various regions of the dentition. A total of 144 participants (50 males and 94 females) with metal brackets were randomly assigned to one of four groups: High-Frequency Vibration (V), Cotton Roll (CR), Elastomeric Wafer (EW), and Open Mouth group (OM). Pain levels were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) across different sextants of the dentition. The Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc analyses were conducted to compare VAS scores between groups. The Mann-Whitney test was used to analyse sex-based differences. The V group, utilizing high-frequency vibration, had the lowest total VAS score, indicating superior pain relief compared to CR, EW, and OM groups. No significant difference was observed between the CR and EW groups. Median VAS scores were highest in the lower front sextant, followed by the upper front sextants, and lowest in the posterior regions, indicating greater pain sensitivity in the anterior regions during debonding. High-frequency vibration was the most effective method for reducing pain during orthodontic debonding, particularly in the anterior dental regions. Both CR and EW methods were also effective but to a lesser extent. These findings suggest that high-frequency vibration could significantly improve patient comfort during orthodontic procedures. Utilizing high-frequency vibration for orthodontic debonding can enhance patient comfort, especially in the more sensitive anterior dental regions, thereby potentially improving treatment compliance and experience.Trial registration: NCT05904587.

Evaluation of the Conventional Acid-Etching System and the Self-Etching Primer in Bonding Metallic Orthodontic Brackets: An In-Vitro and In-Vivo Study.

This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of enamel-bonded orthodontic brackets with the conventional acid etching (CAE) system and the self-etching primer (SEP)in vitro and to compare the clinical performance of both systems when used in the treatment of malocclusion patients. In the first part of the study, 40 extracted human premolars were randomly divided into two groups containing 20 teeth. The first group (the conventional enamel etching group) employed37% phosphoric acid before bonding the metallic brackets (0.022-inch slot, MBT prescription, American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI, USA). The etching system wasTetric 5th (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). The second group used a SEP (Sep Tetric 7th, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) to bond the same brackets. In the first part of the study, SBS was evaluated, followed by the adhesive remnant index (ARI) assessment. The second part of the study (i.e., the clinical part) assessed a cohort of 30 patients during a 6-month observation period. The upper 10 teeth (from the second premolar on the right side to the second on the right side) were bonded using the chosen method for each patient in the clinical assessment. That is, 150 teeth in each group were evaluated regarding the failure rate. The ARI was assessed for those teeth that lost their brackets. The mean SBS was greater in the SEP group compared to the CAE group (17.93 MPa and 16.60 MPa, respectively; P = 0.014). The difference was not statistically significant. Conversely, the failure rate was lower in the CAE group compared to the SEP group, with a failure rate of 6% and 14.7%, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.014). However, the ARI showed no statistically significant difference in in-vivo and in-vitro analyses, as most bracket failures were at the adhesive level. Laboratory results showed no statistical difference in the SBS mean values between the two groups. Clinically, the SEP group showed a greater failure rate than the CAE group, but both failure rates in the two groups were within the clinically acceptable range. The ARI did not show any difference between the two groups in terms of the failure site when the evaluation was conducted in vivo and in vitro, as most of the areas of failure were concentrated in the material itself.

Comparative Analysis of Shear Bond Strength in Orthodontic Brackets Between Milled and 3D-Printed Definitive CAD/CAM Restorations

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets bonded to two types of CAD/CAM composite restorations: milled and 3D-printed. Materials and Methods: A total of 160 flat-shaped specimens (10 × 10 × 2 mm3) were prepared from four different CAD/CAM composites; two milled (Lava Ultimate™ [LU] and Grandio™ [GR]) and two 3D-printed (Crowntec™ [CT] and C&B Permanent™ [CB]). These specimens underwent thermocycling (5000 cycles at 5–55 °C), then were categorized based on the surface treatment into four groups (n = 10): Group C (control, no surface treatment), Group HF (treated with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid), Group DB (mechanical roughening by a diamond bur), and Group SB (sandblasting using aluminum oxide). Metal brackets were bonded using Transbond XT Primer and universal adhesive, stored in artificial saliva for 24 h, then thermocycled again. Shear bond strength (SBS) was tested using a universal testing machine until bracket debonding occurred. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was assessed using a stereomicroscope to quantify the residual adhesive following debonding. Result: Regarding material, GR and LU restorations had significantly higher SBS values compared to CT and CB, ranging from 13.90 MPa to 20.35 MPa. Regarding surface treatment, SB and HF groups showed significantly higher SBS values. The ARI scores showed different adhesive modes of failure, with higher instances of scores 0 and 1, which indicate no or minimal adhesive remaining. Conclusions: Both milled and 3D-printed materials had adequate SBS for clinical use, with milled materials showing superior results. Surface treatments like sandblasting and HF significantly improved bond strength, with adhesive failure being common.

Effect of endodontically treated teeth on prosthetically guided orthodontics with clear aligners: a case series

BackgroundProsthetically guided orthodontics (PGO) can correct the malocclusion for better prosthetic rehabilitation in esthetic rehabilitation. Unlike conventional orthodontic treatment, only minor tooth movement is designed in PGO according to the requirement of subsequent restoration. For better appearance during the treatment, PGO is often performed with clear aligners, which have no metal brackets. It has been proven that the PGO with clear aligners can achieve generally satisfactory outcomes. However, its risk has not been fully known due to the paucity of relevant studies.Case presentationThree patients who needed esthetic rehabilitation with mild malocclusion were included in this study. After evaluation, a prosthetic solution alone was considered insufficient to provide optimal outcomes. Thus, they were treated using PGO with clear aligners (Invisalign Go, Align Technology, Santa Clara, California, USA) and accomplished prosthetic rehabilitation subsequently. Dental history and X-ray examination revealed that endodontically treated teeth (ETT) existed in all the cases. Intraoral photographs were collected to compare the pre-treatment and post-treatment dentition. After PGO, posterior ETT did not maintain their position as scheduled and lost occlusal contacts, while all the anterior teeth, including anterior ETT, were moved to the designed position. Corresponding prosthetic rehabilitation was used to solve it after consulting with the patients.ConclusionsOcclusal contact loss of posterior ETT is a potential risk in PGO with clear aligners, affecting the orthodontic result.

A comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of Chlorhexidine and Chlorine dioxide on self-ligating brackets contaminated with Streptococcus mutans biofilm- An In vitro study

ObjectiveTo evaluate and compare antimicrobial efficacy of Chlorhexidine and Chlorine dioxide mouthwashes on S.mutans biofilm created on metal and ceramic self-ligating brackets. Materials and methodsA total of 162 metal and ceramic self-ligating brackets (3M™ SmartClip™ & Clarity SL™) were randomly divided into 3 groups and 2 subgroups. Standard procedures were followed to coat all brackets with S.mutans biofilm. The biofilms were cultivated which were then subjected to the effects of the mouthwashes. Quantitative assessment was carried out by comparing the number of viable colonies of S.mutans. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the data between the experimental and control groups. (p < 0.05). ResultWhen compared to untreated controls the antimicrobial efficacy of Chlorhexidine Digluconate and Chlorine Dioxide mouthwashes was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.00). The comparison between Chlorhexidine digluconate and Chlorine dioxide mouthwashes was not statistically significant in Ceramic self-ligating group (p = 0.502) and statistically significant in Metal self-ligating group (p = 0.001) ConclusionS mutans colonies on metal and ceramic self-ligating brackets can be reduced effectively by Chlorhexidine digluconate and Chlorine dioxide mouthwashes. Chlorhexidine digluconate more effective for metal bracket group. Both mouthwashes had comparable antimicrobial effectiveness, with the difference in the number of viable colonies following exposure for ceramic bracket groups.

In vitro determination of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity induced by stainless steel brackets with and without surface coating in cultures of oral mucosal cells

BackgroundOrthodontics is a speciality of dentistry that uses a plethora of devices made from myriad materials to manage various malocclusions. Prolonged contact of orthodontic appliances with oral tissues can lead to cellular damage, highlighting the need for biocompatible materials to mitigate health risks.ObjectivesTo analyze the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity produced by metal brackets and coated metallic brackets with polymeric and nanoparticle coatings in oral mucosal cells.Materials & methodsThe current study compares the toxicity of 3 different types of orthodontic brackets with control groups of oral mucosal cells. Each of the three treatment groups consisted of 10 samples of orthodontic brackets: stainless steel brackets(Group 1), nanoparticle-coated brackets(Group 2), and polymeric-coated brackets(Group 3) exposed to corrosion eluates employing an oral biomimicry model. Two types of oral mucosal cells- Human Gingival Fibroblasts and Buccal Epithelial Cells were used to study the cytotoxic and/or genotoxic effects of the elutes. Intergroup comparisons were conducted using one-way analysis of variance, while scanning electron microscopy evaluated surface characteristic.ResultsThe interaction between metal ions and oral mucosal cells showed no statistically significant difference for toxicity assays between the three groups(p > 0.005). However, polymeric and nanoparticle-coated groups showed reduced cellular differentiation when compared with conventional stainless-steel brackets.ConclusionThis in-vitro study shows that polymeric or nanoparticle coating of conventional metal brackets aids in enhancing corrosion-resistant characteristics of orthodontic appliances and reduces the toxic oral environment created by metal release in the oral cavity.

Comparison of Friction Resistance Between Different Bracket Systems: An In Vitro Study

Introduction The efficiency of tooth movement associated with orthodontic sliding mechanics can be compromised by friction between archwire and tube or bracket slot. Orthodontic brackets and archwires are important constituents of an orthodontic appliance system. Friction is an uncontrolled variable of particular interest when continuous arch techniques are used to align and move teeth by way of sliding a tube or bracket along an arch. Aim and Objectives Comparison of frictional resistance between different bracket systems of 3M and MO brands in combination with different wires of 3M, MO, and G&amp;H brands. Evaluation of frictional resistance between two different types of bracket systems and different types of wire combinations. Materials and Methods Two types of bracket systems were used: metal bracket system and ceramic bracket system (3M and MO brands). Four different orthodontic wire alloys were used: stainless steel (SS), TMA, NiTi, and CuNiTi (3M, MO, and G&amp;H brands). A rectangular block made up of self-cure acrylic resin was designed to hold the bracket during the mechanical test. Each bracket base was glued to an acrylic block with cyanoacrylate glue. The wire segment was inserted into the bracket and was ligated passively with SS ligature wire. The bracket–wire combination was submitted to mechanical tests with a universal testing machine. One end of the acrylic block was mounted to the lower grip of the universal testing machine. The free end of the archwire was fixed to the upper grip of the universal testing machine. The friction which was generated between the wire and bracket was measured under dry conditions and at room temperature. The test wire was pulled through the bracket at a speed of 0.5 cm/min. The load cell registered a maximum force level. This data was stored in the computer and was submitted to statistical analysis, and parameter tests were applied. Results The highest mean friction resistance of 5.998 N was generated by group B2-E2 (ceramic bracket – MO + TMA archwire – MO). The lowest mean friction resistance of 2.552 N was generated by group A1-C1 (metal bracket – 3M + SS wire – 3M). There was a statistically significant difference between the friction generated by the metal bracket on SS archwire and the ceramic bracket on TMA archwire regardless of 3M or MO brand material ( p value &lt; .0001) and metal bracket ( p = .0004).

Investigation of Changes in Tooth Colour After the Use of Different Aligners.

Clear aligner treatment is an orthodontic treatment that is custom-made with 3D printers without the use of conventional metal or porcelain wires and brackets. It is a modern orthodontic method used to correct tooth positions that need to be corrected aesthetically and functionally. Aim This study aimed to compare the discolouration of teeth and clear aligners after 15 days of full-time use of clear aligners. Materials and methods The 20 patients in the study group had used clear aligners for 45 days, including three different clear aligners for 15 days. In addition, 20 patients were included as a control group to measure the difference in tooth discolouration. Retaining attachments using G-Aenial (GC Corp, Tokyo, Japan) and 3M ESPE (St. Paul, MN, USA) flowable composites were placed crosswise to each patient in the distal regions of all lateral and canine teeth. The performance of three aligner plates (Zendura Flex (Bay Materials LLC, Fremont, CA, USA); Duran (ScheuDental GmbH, Iserlohn, Germany); and Taglus (Laxmi Dental Export Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, India)), two fluid composite attachments, and two clear aligner cleaners regarding discoloration were tested. Each aligner was used for 15 days, and then the patient was moved to the next aligner. Colour change on the aligners and the patients' teeth were assessed from the canine to the middle third and mid-plane of the canine tooth using a VITA Easyshade V spectrophotometer (Bad Säckingen, Germany). An aligner cleaner was used immediately after the patients used their clear aligners, and then the measurements of the aligner color values were completed. The 120 aligners obtained were divided into two groups. Sixty aligners were treated with Fresh Guard (Efferdent, Lynchburg, VA, USA), and the other 60 were treated with Corega (GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK) tablets and stored in a glass of water. Results The colour stability of G-Aenial Flo was higher than that of the 3M ESPE fluid composite (p=0.040 and p=0.024). Our study determined that staining occurred in all the teeth we measured as a result of using aligner. Fresh Guard aligner cleaner caused more discoloration on Zendura and Duran aligners than Corega aligner cleaner (p<0.05). Taglus plaque was found to have more discoloration than Zendura and Duran aligner (p<0.05). Conclusion In conclusion, Duran clear aligners are preferable to other clear aligners in terms of discoloration. In addition, G-Aenial Flo can be recommended as an attachment or fluid composite because of its better color stability results.

The effect of addition of Bioglass 45S5 to orthodontic adhesive on shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets, An in vitro study

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of incorporating Bioglass (BG) 45S5 into an orthodontic adhesive on the shear bond strength (SBS) of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) score. Methods: In this in vitro study, 55 extracted sound premolars were randomly divided into five groups (n=11 each). Metal brackets were bonded using Ambar FGM orthodontic adhesive without BG (control group) and with BG 45S5 added at concentrations of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% by weight in groups 2 to 5, respectively. The SBS was measured using a universal testing machine, and the ARI score was determined under a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA at a significance level of α=0.05. Results: The highest mean SBS was observed in the 20% BG Group (48.28±24.5 MPa), followed by the control group (35.81±11.11 MPa), 15% BG Group (19.64±5.42 MPa), 10% BG Group (16.3±9.33 MPa), and 5% BG Group (14.21±4.23 MPa). The SBS in the 20% BG Group was significantly higher than in the control (P=0.013), 5% BG (P=0.000), and 10% BG (P=0.002) groups. No significant differences were found in ARI scores among the groups (P=0.810). Conclusion: Adding BG 45S5 to the orthodontic adhesive at concentrations of 5%, 10%, and 15% did not significantly affect the SBS, but a 20% concentration increased the SBS. Incorporating BG at these levels does not adversely impact the SBS or ARI scores.

Comparative Analysis of Displacements and Stress Produced by Square and Rectangular Bracket Slot With Incremental Torque: A Finite Element Analysis Study.

This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of stresses and displacements with incremental torque on the maxillary incisors and surrounding cortical bone using conventional metal brackets with rectangular slots and passive self-ligating brackets with square slots using finite element analysis (FEA). An in vitro FEA study was conducted, in which a three-dimensional (3D) model of the maxilla was built using ANSYS softwareversion 18 (ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA). The conventional McLaughlin, Bennet, and Trevisi (MBT) bracket (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA) of 0.022 × 0.028-inch slot with a 0.019 × 0.025-inch rectangular stainless steel (SS) archwire (model 1) was compared with the Pitts 21™ self-ligating bracket system (OC Orthodontics, McMinnville, OR) of 0.021 x 0.21-inch slot with a 0.020 × 0.020-inch square SS archwire (model 2) at incremental torques of 5°, 10°, 15°, and 20°. The von Mises stress was evaluated at the maxillary incisors and surrounding cortical bone. The torque moment, tipping angle, and displacement of the maxillary incisors were also measured and compared between the bracket systems. The highest torque expression of 13.8 N-mm was observed in model 2, compared to a torque expression of 10.68 N-mm in model 1. The torque expression increased in both models from 0°to 20°. There was a play of 6.2°at 20°torquein model 2, whereas it was 9.32°​​​​​​​play in model 1. The torque expressions were better for the lateral incisors than for the central incisors. Increased incremental torque was associated with increased proclination of the incisors, and this movement was more pronounced for the central incisor and model 1. Furthermore, it was revealed that the stresses on the cortical bone and teeth were higher in model 2 than in model 1. It was concluded that the Pitts 21™ passive self-ligating system produced better torque expression and less play with square SS archwire compared to conventional brackets with rectangular SS archwire.

Comparison of Microleakage and Bond Strength in Metal and Ceramic Brackets Cured by Conventional and Transillumination Methods: An In-vitro Evaluation

Comparison of Microleakage and Bond Strength in Metal and Ceramic Brackets Cured by Conventional and Transillumination Methods: An In-vitro Evaluation

Evaluation of Etching Time Effect on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Self-Adhesive Composite: An in-Vitro Study

Introduction: Precise acid etching of the tooth surface is a significant factor in the strength of the bracket bond. The current study aimed to determine the effect of different application times of acid etching on the shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets under controlled laboratory conditions. Methods: Sixty intact premolar teeth were selected for this in-vitro study. The samples were divided into four groups based on the different acid etching times: 20, 25, 30, and 35 seconds. The teeth surfaces were etched with 37% phosphoric acid according to the specified times, and brackets were bonded to the enamel surface using GC Ortho connect composite. Shear bond strength values of the brackets was measured using a Universal Testing Machine. The amount of Adhesive Remnant Index was also observed using a stereomicroscope. Additionally, the surface roughness of the tooth enamel after bracket bonding was examined using SEM. The results related to shear bond strength were analyzed with one-way ANOVA statistical test and using SPSS version 16 software. The non-parametric Kruskal Wallis (Wallis-Kruskal) test was also used to check the frequency of ARI index. Results: The highest shear bond strength was observed at 25 seconds, and the lowest at 30 seconds. However, there was no significant difference in the shear bond strength of brackets was observed among the four groups (p=0.186). The highest ARI score was observed at 35 seconds, and the lowest at 20 seconds. No statistically significant difference was observed in the ARI scores in different groups. SEM images revealed that the enamel surface porosity was highest at 20 seconds. Conclusion: The results indicate that the shear bond strength and ARI at different acid etching times do not significantly differ. Therefore, orthodontic bracket bonding can be performed with less acid etching time.

Impact of Metallic Brackets on Self-Perception of Orthodontic Patients

Impact of Metallic Brackets on Self-Perception of Orthodontic Patients

Experimental recurrence of an unreported fire risk of power cable: Discharge of bracket cable metallic grounding under coupled vibration conditions

In environments like bridges and tunnels, power cables are laid on metal brackets (hereinafter referred to as bracket cables). If the aluminum sheath and metal bracket form a metallic grounding fault, the air gap near the contact point may bear an intermittent discharge under the cable vibration, which is a potential source of cable fires. However, current research on cable grounding systems does not focus on analyzing the physical metallic grounding process. Discharge from coupled vibrations has been overlooked. This study accomplished the experimental recurrence of discharge at the metallic grounding point of cables under coupled vibration. According to the experimental observations, intermittent electric sparks and AC arc occur with the contact and separation of the aluminum sheath and the metal bracket due to vibrations. Under coupled vibration conditions, metallic grounding faults in cables pose a risk of causing cable fires.

Photoactivated riboflavin-doped hydroxy apatite nanospheres infiltered in orthodontic adhesives.

To assess micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS), degree of conversion (DC), microleakage (ML) antibacterial efficacy, and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of orthodontic brackets to enamel with different concentrations of photoactivated riboflavin-doped hydroxyapatite (HA) nanospheres (NS) (0%,1%,5% and 10%) and 0.5 wt% RF alone in orthodontic adhesive. Samples were included on the predefined inclusion criteria and positioned up to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Hydroxy apatite nanospheres (HANS) commercially bought were doped with RF. Surface characterization of HANS and RF-doped HANS were assessed along with EDX analysis. Samples were grouped based on experimental orthodontic adhesive modification. Group 1: Transbond XT no modification, Group 2: experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF, Group 3: experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF-doped 1% HANS, Group 4: experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt % RF-doped 5% HANS and Group 5: Experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF-doped 10% HANS. Brackets were placed based on different adhesive modifications and samples underwent thermocycling. Samples were evaluated for μTBS, DC, and ML. The type of failure was assessed using ARI. Adhesive modified and un-modified in four different concentrations (0%, 1%, 5%, and 10%) and 0.5 wt% RF only were used to test efficacy against Streptococcus mutans (S.mutans). The survival rate of S.mutans and ML was determined using the Kruskal-Wallis Test. For the analysis of μTBS, ANOVA was employed, followed by a post-hoc Tukey HSD multiple comparisons test. The highest μTBS and lowest ML were observed in Group 2 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF only. The lowest μTBS, highest ML, and lowest DC was seen in Group 5 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF-doped 10% HANS. Samples in Group 1 in which Transbond XT was used as adhesive demonstrated significantly the highest microbial count of S.mutans and DC. Photoactivated RF-doped HANS in 1% and 0.5 wt% Riboflavin alone in orthodontic adhesive for metallic bracket bonding improved micro tensile bond strength, ML, DC, and antibacterial scores. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: The highest μTBS and lowest ML were observed in Group 2 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF only. The lowest μTBS, highest ML, and lowest DC was seen in Group 5 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF-doped 10% HA-NS. Samples in Group 1 in which Transbond XT was used as adhesive demonstrated significantly the highest microbial count of S.mutans and DC.

Comparison of the Adhesive Remnant Index and Shear Bond Strength of Different Metal Bracket Bases on Artificially Aged Human Teeth: An In vitro Study

Abstract Aim: Bond failure can compromise the clinical efficacy and duration of orthodontic treatment. A decemented bracket can lengthen the course of treatment by about 0.6 months. This study aimed to compare the adhesive remnant index (ARI) and shear bond strength of different metal bracket bases on artificially aged human teeth. Materials and Methods: In this experimental in vitro, prospective, cross-sectional study, thirty-six human premolars were cemented with three types of metal bracket base designs: Group 1 had a laser-structured base, Group 2 had a mesh base, and Group 3 had a base with retention grooves. All groups were bonded with Transbond XT light-curing resin. Shear strength testing was performed, and the ARI was evaluated. The parametric one-factor analysis of variance test and Tukey’s post hoc test were used for the comparison of shear bond strength, and the effect size was also evaluated with eta squared. In addition, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare the ARI of the three groups on an ordinal scale. All statistics were set at a significance of P &lt; 0.05. Results: The ARI scores did not exhibit any statistically significant differences (P = 0.163). Nevertheless, the three groups exhibited statistically significant differences in shear bond strength, with an effect size of 69% (P &lt; 0.001). The mesh base bracket had the lowest average (9.9 ± 2.6 MPa) (P &lt; 0.001), while the laser-structured base bracket had the greatest average (19.1 ± 3.0 MPa) (P = 0.006). Conclusion: The variation in shear bond strength was influenced by 69% due to the type of the metal bracket base used. Laser-structured and mesh-based brackets had the highest and lowest shear strength, respectively. All bases left a similar ARI on the tooth enamel.

Evaluating the effectiveness of color changing adhesives versus ultraviolet absorbent dye additive adhesives in the removal of adhesive remnants after orthodontic debonding

The fixed orthodontic treatment initiates with bonding and ends up with debonding of brackets which alters the enamel surface. The adhesive remnants present on the enamel surface after debonding are removed with the help of various aids but alters the enamel surface to an extent and there is no alternative material or instrument for removing the adhesives. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of color changing orthodontic bonding adhesives versus ultraviolet absorbent dye additive orthodontic bonding adhesives in the removal of adhesive remnants after orthodontic debonding.: 40 extracted human premolars were procured and metal brackets were bonded to the buccal surface with Group 1 – Enlight, Group 2 – Grengloo, Group 3 - Brace Paste &amp; Group 4 – Enlight + UV dye additive. Debonding of brackets were done in INSTRON and evaluated for ARI score in stereo microscope and photo micrographs were taken to analyze the surface area in ImageJ software with conventional and UV light source. Then the adhesive remnants were removed with tungsten carbide bur at low speed with appropriate illumination and the enamel surface is assessed under scanning electron microscope for EDI score. This study resulted with time taken for the removal of adhesive remnants between the 4 groups and indicates statistically significant difference (p&amp;#60;0.05). Group 3 (Brace Paste) possesses the less time taken for the removal of adhesive remnants between the other three groups and shear bond strength reveals a statistically significant difference (p&amp;#60;0.05) between the three adhesive groups. This current study concluded that the color changing adhesives with the fluorescence property were significantly different when compared with other adhesives due to the reduction in time taken for the removal of adhesive remnants from the enamel surface with minimal damage. Additionally the introduction of a UV dye additive for the visual distinction between the enamel structure and adhesive remnant also proves to be a valuable aid in the assessment of adhesive remnant index and removal.