Dear Article Authors: I want to thank you all for the time and energy you spent reading and interpreting my interest inventories. Few people have the opportunity to be the subject of such thought-provoking analyses as these, especially from counselors of your caliber. As I'm sure you've guessed, I'm rarely at a loss for words, but words wouldn't do justice to the gratitude I feel toward Dr. Savickas for this opportunity. I want you all to know that I truly appreciate your comments, and thought you might like to know the direction I have chosen. Before I tell you, I will have to admit that I felt a bit like a live animal in a science experiment laid open to be probed when I sat down to read all of these. Each one of you hit something so perfectly that I was astounded. These articles (and the career counseling process) remind me of the board game called Operation. The red buzzer nose of the game board patient would sound in alarm when my shaky tweezers hit the metal pocket holding the funny bone. Similarly, the buzzer in my brain went off each time I read something in these articles that not only applied to me, but enlightened me. Some were painful, but always helpful. Following is my response to each article. In the Hartung article assessing the C-DAC approach, I was struck by the difference in make versus making decisions. I am a bad decision maker, and this is something I need to work on. But I especially liked the shopping metaphor, because it spoke directly to me as an English teacher and a shopper. It was a perfect summary of what I have been doing for the last 10 years. Recently, I have started buying. I am learning to meet people in my field, which has made me much more interested in the direction I am going. To continue the metaphor, I am considering throwing away the sales slip that will allow me to exchange my current career path for the old one of high school teaching. Not only am I starting to realize that I can't go back (as a PhD, I will price myself out of the market), but that I really don't want to. As you say, I am beginning to consider how to refocus so that if I want, secondary school students can in some way also be a part of my future. The Prediger and Schmertz article assessed the UNIACT. Although I have little doubt this was a very useful discussion of the UNIACT from a counselor's point of view, it did not offer much that I could use. I did like the World-of-Work Map, and I think it could be useful for someone at the beginning stages of the career decision-making process. The Campbell Interest and Skill Survey was discussed by Dr. Boggs. In interpreting the CISS, she hit the nail on the head when she assessed the Interpreting and Creating scores, because corporate trainer is high on the option list. In the Animal Care Bs, Dr. Boggs wondered if I had a pet. I don't, but I would love one! I found the style of the discussion portion that followed extremely helpful (probably due to my verbal nature). Most notable was that Dr. Boggs was the only counselor who brought up the issue of motherhood and how that might intermingle with my career choices. Other notable comments included her confirmation that a firm sense of direction is vitally important during counseling. I get extremely frustrated when that does not happen. Also, I thought it was interesting that she asked questions of herself in terms of the counselor-counselee relationship and the importance of my expectations of her as a counselor. Finally, Dr. Boggs unknowingly picked up on the shopping metaphor when she concluded with her emphasis that career development is a series of choices, not one choice. But her final sentence recalled the most salient point mentioned, which is the balance between career and personal life that I am constantly trying to maintain. In interpreting the Strong Interest Inventory, Dr. Prince hit on a number of issues that came up in my actual counseling sessions, such as the importance of learning in my life and how I would maintain that if I didn't pursue the PhD. …
Read full abstract