The electrochemistry of glassy , , , and mixed‐phase glassy ∼A‐15, nanocrystalline were examined in comparison to chromium. For oxidizing conditions these materials are passive and exhibit similar film formation kinetics. In reducing environments, chromium is in the active state. The excellent corrosion behavior of and is attributed to the fact that, unlike chromium, these materials cannot be stably activated. The characteristics of chromium‐metalloid materials resemble that of chromium‐noble metal alloys. By analogy to the noble metals, alloying with phosphorus and boron accelerates the kinetics of proton reduction such that the steady‐state electrochemical potential of the system is set in a domain consistent with the passive state of chromium. The metalloids also block the metal dissolution reaction at active potentials. For the degree of anodic inhibition increases significantly with phosphorus concentration. The remarkable effect of the metalloids on corrosion resistance may be partially attributed to the metalloid‐hydride and proton reduction equilibria being positive of the active‐passive transition of chromium. This correlation helps rationalize the varying effects of alloying boron and phosphorus with different transition metals, e.g., reactive vs. passive .