Metachronous Disease Research Articles

Prediction of mortality in metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-life population: a multicenter explorative analysis

BackgroundMetastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains a lethal disease. Survival, however, is increasing due to a growing number of treatment options. Yet due to the number of prognostic factors and their interactions, prediction of mortality is difficult. The aim of this study is to provide a clinical model supporting prognostication of mCRC mortality in daily practice.MethodsData from 1104 patients with mCRC in three prospective cancer datasets were used to construct and validate Cox models. Input factors for stepwise backward method variable selection were sex, RAS/BRAF-status, microsatellite status, treatment type (no treatment, systemic treatment with or without resection of metastasis), tumor load, location of primary tumor, metastatic patterns and synchronous or metachronous disease. The final prognostic model for prediction of survival at two and 3 years was validated via bootstrapping to obtain calibration and discrimination C-indices and dynamic time dependent AUC.ResultsAge, sidedness, number of organs with metastases, lung as only site of metastasis, BRAF mutation status and treatment type were selected for the model. Treatment type had the most prominent influence on survival (resection of metastasis HR 0.26, CI 0.21–0.32; any treatment vs no treatment HR 0.31, CI 0.21–0.32), followed by BRAF mutational status (HR 2.58, CI 1.19–1.59). Validation showed high accuracy with C-indices of 72.2 and 71.4%, and dynamic time dependent AUC’s of 76.7 ± 1.53% (both at 2 or 3 years), respectively.ConclusionThe mCRC mortality prediction model is well calibrated and internally valid. It has the potential to support both, clinical prognostication for treatment decisions and patient communication.

Endoscopic Resection Without Subsequent Ablation Therapy for Early Barrett’s Neoplasia: Endoscopic Findings and Long-Term Mortality

IntroductionAfter endoscopic resection (ER) of neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus (BE), it is recommended to ablate the remaining BE to minimize the risk for metachronous disease. However, we report long-term outcomes for a nationwide cohort of all patients who did not undergo ablation of the remaining BE after ER for early BE neoplasia, due to clinical reasons or performance status. MethodsEndoscopic therapy for BE neoplasia in the Netherlands is centralized in 8 expert centers with specifically trained endoscopists and pathologists. Uniformity is ensured by a joint protocol and regular group meetings. We report all patients who underwent ER for a neoplastic lesion between 2008 and 2018, without further ablation therapy. Outcomes include progression during endoscopic FU and all-cause mortality. ResultsNinety-four patients were included with mean age 74 (± 10) years. ER was performed for low-grade dysplasia (LGD) (10%), high-grade dysplasia (HGD) (25%), or low-risk esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) (65%). No additional ablation was performed for several reasons; in 73 patients (78%), the main argument was expected limited life expectancy. Median C2M5 BE persisted after ER, and during median 21 months (IQR 11–51) with 4 endoscopies per patient, no patient progressed to advanced cancer. Seventeen patients (18%) developed HGD/EAC: all were curatively treated endoscopically. In total, 29/73 patients (40%) with expected limited life expectancy died due to unrelated causes during FU, none of EAC. ConclusionIn selected patients, ER monotherapy with endoscopic surveillance of the residual BE is a valid alternative to eradication therapy with ablation.

Abstract PO-106: Genomic heterogeneity and clonal dynamics of resistance evolution and metastatic progression in rectal cancer

Abstract The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. However, patient response to pre-operative chemoradiotherapy is highly heterogeneous, ranging from complete tumor regression to no response. Over the course of disease, up to 40% of patients suffer from local relapse or the development of metachronous metastatic disease, compromising survival. It is not yet known how treatment resistance and disease progression in these patients evolve – whether from the selective outgrowth of pre-existing resistant clones during treatment or through the acquisition of additional, resistance conferring genomic alterations. We aim to delineate the genomic evolution and clonal architecture underlying treatment resistance and metastatic progression in rectal cancer based on a cohort of 42 patients, from which 98 tumor samples were collected longitudinally over the course of treatment and metastatic progression. Tumor diagnosis and treatment response assessment are routinely based on the histopathologic evaluation of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) patient tissues. While formalin fixation and paraffin embedding optimally preserve histomorphology and allow long-term tissue storage at ambient temperature, they, on the other hand, lead to DNA crosslinks posing a challenge for sequencing analyses. To overcome this limitation, we have successfully developed a protocol for dissociation of FFPE tissues into single cells that are suitable for immunolabeling, flow sorting and genomic analysis by whole exome sequencing of pure tumor cell populations, single cell copy number variation (CNV) sequencing and multiplex interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (miFISH). Our genomic analyses at the population as well as individual cell level revealed divergent aberration patterns and distinct levels of intra-tumor heterogeneity. Major tumor clones were characterized by gains of EGFR (7p11.2), MYC (8q24.21), CDX2 (13q12.2) and ZNF217 (20q13.2) along with losses of SMAD4 (18q21.2) and TP53 (17p13.1). While in some patients the clonal composition remained largely stable throughout treatment, in others major clonal shifts occurred favoring clones with TP53 loss. Our preliminary results indicate different propensities of genetically distinct tumor cell clones in therapy response and metastatic progression. Furthermore, our data show the feasibility of high-resolution clonal reconstruction from whole exome sequencing and single cell CNV sequencing data of FFPE cells. Citation Format: Daniela Hirsch, Judith Lieberich, Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad, Yonca Ceribas, Michael Kelly, Keyur Talsania, Yongmei Zhao, Timo Gaiser, Thomas Ried. Genomic heterogeneity and clonal dynamics of resistance evolution and metastatic progression in rectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Tumor Heterogeneity: From Single Cells to Clinical Impact; 2020 Sep 17-18. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(21 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-106.

Syndromic Wilms tumor: a review of predisposing conditions, surveillance and treatment.

Predisposing syndromes associated with an increased risk of Wilms tumor (WT) are responsible for 9–17% of all cases of the malignancy. Due to an earlier age at WT diagnosis and an increased incidence of bilateral and metachronous disease, management of syndromic WT warrants a distinct approach from that of non-syndromic WT. This review of English-language manuscripts about WT focuses on the most common syndromes, surveillance protocols and current treatment strategies. Highlighted syndromes include those associated with WT1, such as WAGR (Wilms-Aniridia-Genitourinary-mental Retardation), Denys-Drash syndrome (DDS), and Frasier syndrome, 11p15 defects, such as Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), among others. General surveillance guidelines include screening renal or abdominal ultrasound every 3–4 months until the age of 5 or 7, depending on the syndrome. Further, some of the predisposing conditions also increase the risk of other malignancies, such as gonadoblastoma and hepatoblastoma. With promising results for nephron-sparing surgery in bilateral non-syndromic WT, there are increasing reports and recommendations to pursue nephron-sparing for these patients who are at greater risk of bilateral, metachronous lesions. In addition to the loss of renal parenchyma from malignancy, many patients are at risk of developing renal insufficiency as part of their syndrome. Although there may be some increase in the complication rate, recurrence free survival seems equivalent. Some conditions require specialized approaches to adjuvant therapy, as their syndrome may make them especially susceptible to side effects.

Case report of ablative magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy for oligometastatic mesenteric lymph nodes from bladder cancer

: Several randomized trials have demonstrated that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can significantly improve long-term clinical outcomes for patients with oligometastatic (OM) cancer, commonly defined as 1–5 metastatic lesions. Some lesions, especially those in the abdomen and pelvis, may not be appropriate candidates for receiving ablative dose if daily on-board computed tomography (CT) is used because of limited target lesion and normal anatomy visualization. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) inherently provides superior soft tissue delineation as compared to CT and only recently have MR-guided linear accelerators (LINACs) become commercially available. MR-LINACs can also perform daily online adaptive replanning based on the current day’s anatomy, further positioning this novel technology as a preferred means to safely deliver ablative dose, even to targets in anatomically challenging locations. Here we present the case of a 49-year-old man with bladder cancer who underwent cystectomy and developed metachronous disease in 2 mesenteric lymph nodes for which he received MR-guided SBRT with daily online adaptive replanning to a prescription dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions. He achieved a significant radiographic response and did not experience significant treatment-related toxicity. We discuss unique advantages of MR guidance and novel applications, especially in the context of OM disease.

Synchronous Versus Metachronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis Yields Similar Survival in Modern Era

BackgroundSynchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) has been viewed as being more aggressive and having shorter survival than metachronous disease. Advances in CRLM management led us to examine differences in treatment characteristics of synchronous versus metachronous CRLM patients along with survival and recurrence. Materials and methodsA retrospective review of hepatic resection for CRLM at a tertiary academic medical center was performed for two periods: a historic cohort from 1992 to 2010 (n = 121), and a modern cohort (n = 179) from 2012 to 2018. Clinical variables were compared between the patient groups, and survival outcomes were characterized. ResultsFive-year disease-specific survival for the modern synchronous group compared to the historic synchronous group was 71.7% versus 44.3% (P = 0.02). Modern metachronous versus modern synchronous 5-y disease-specific survival rates were 49.8% versus 71.7% (P = 0.31). Compared to the historic cohort, the modern one had significantly different timing of hepatic resection (P < 0.01) with increased use of liver-first (30.1% versus 7.5%) and simultaneous liver-colon resections (24.1% versus 10.4%), along with greater use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (96.4% versus 65.6%; P < 0.01). Significantly more patients in the modern synchronous cohort had disease-free or alive-with-disease status at last follow-up, compared to the historic group (P < 0.01), and experienced less disease recurrence (62.7% versus 77.6%; P < 0.05). ConclusionsModern synchronous CRLM patients who underwent hepatic resection experienced significantly improved survival compared to a historic cohort. We postulate that increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and liver-first/simultaneous liver-colon resections in the modern synchronous cohort contributed to improved survival.

Impact of prior (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab (NAT) exposure on the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy for metastatic breast cancer

Trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel are the standard first-line therapy for HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, only 10% of patients received neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant trastuzumab (NAT) in the registration trial (NCT00567190). In contemporary practice, the majority of recurrent HER2+ MBC patients had prior NAT. We explore any impact of prior therapy on the efficacy of dual HER2-targeted antibody with taxane therapy for metastatic disease. Utilising a prospective national registry, clinico-pathological, treatment, and outcome data for HER2+ MBC patients diagnosed between October 2006 and January 2019 were collected. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared among groups by log-rank test. Of 287 HER2+ MBC patients, 222 (77%) received first-line trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and taxane therapy. There were 130 (45%) with de novo MBC. Of the recurrent MBC patients 107/157 (68%) had received NAT. The median progression-free survival (PFS) among patients who received NAT was 15.8months compared with 24.3months without prior NAT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.45, 95% CI 1.05-2.03, p = 0.03). The median overall survival (OS) was 42.7months in patients who had NAT, and was not reached in those who did not (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.12-2.90, p = 0.02). However, when excluding de novo MBC patients, prior NAT exposure was no longer significantly associated with survival (p = 0.11). De novo MBC patients had the longest median PFS (25.2months) and OS (91.2months). Prior receipt of NAT was associated with inferior median PFS following first-line HER2-based therapy in the metastatic setting. However, prior NAT exposure did not significantly impact OS, supporting the efficacy of taxane, trastuzumab, pertuzumab combination for first-line HER2+ MBC regardless of prior NAT exposure. Patients with de novo MBC had the longest survival, suggesting stratification for synchronous versus metachronous disease in prospective clinical trials of MBC should be considered.

Resectability and Ablatability Criteria for the Treatment of Liver Only Colorectal Metastases: Multidisciplinary Consensus Document from the COLLISION Trial Group.

The guidelines for metastatic colorectal cancer crudely state that the best local treatment should be selected from a ‘toolbox’ of techniques according to patient- and treatment-related factors. We created an interdisciplinary, consensus-based algorithm with specific resectability and ablatability criteria for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). To pursue consensus, members of the multidisciplinary COLLISION and COLDFIRE trial expert panel employed the RAND appropriateness method (RAM). Statements regarding patient, disease, tumor and treatment characteristics were categorized as appropriate, equipoise or inappropriate. Patients with ECOG≤2, ASA≤3 and Charlson comorbidity index ≤8 should be considered fit for curative-intent local therapy. When easily resectable and/or ablatable (stage IVa), (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy is not indicated. When requiring major hepatectomy (stage IVb), neo-adjuvant systemic therapy is appropriate for early metachronous disease and to reduce procedural risk. To downstage patients (stage IVc), downsizing induction systemic therapy and/or future remnant augmentation is advised. Disease can only be deemed permanently unsuitable for local therapy if downstaging failed (stage IVd). Liver resection remains the gold standard. Thermal ablation is reserved for unresectable CRLM, deep-seated resectable CRLM and can be considered when patients are in poor health. Irreversible electroporation and stereotactic body radiotherapy can be considered for unresectable perihilar and perivascular CRLM 0-5cm. This consensus document provides per-patient and per-tumor resectability and ablatability criteria for the treatment of CRLM. These criteria are intended to aid tumor board discussions, improve consistency when designing prospective trials and advance intersociety communications. Areas where consensus is lacking warrant future comparative studies.

Incidence and management of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous and metachronous colorectal metastases: a population-based study.

BackgroundThis population‐based study aimed to examine the incidence, patterns and results of multimodal management of metastatic colorectal cancer.MethodsA retrospective population‐based study was conducted on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Central Finland in 2000–2015. Clinical and histopathological data were retrieved and descriptive analysis was conducted to determine the pattern of metastatic disease, defined as synchronous, early metachronous (within 12 months of diagnosis of primary disease) and late metachronous (more than 12 months after diagnosis). Subgroups were compared for resection and overall survival (OS) rates.ResultsOf 1671 patients, 296 (17·7 per cent) had synchronous metastases, and 255 (19·6 per cent) of 1302 patients with resected stage I–III tumours developed metachronous metastases (94 early and 161 late metastases). Liver, pulmonary and intraperitoneal metastases were the most common sites. The commonest metastatic patterns were a combination of liver and lung metastases. The overall metastasectomy rate for patients with synchronous metastases was 16·2 per cent; in this subgroup, 3‐ and 5‐year OS rates after any resection were 63 and 44 per cent respectively, compared with 7·1 and 3·3 per cent following no resection (P < 0·001). The resection rate was higher for late than for early metachronous disease (28·0 versus 17 per cent respectively; P = 0·048). Three‐ and 5‐year OS rates after any resection of metachronous metastases were 78 and 62 per cent respectively versus 42·1 and 18·2 per cent with no metastasectomy (P < 0·001). Similarly, 3‐ and 5‐year OS rates after any metastasectomy for early metachronous metastases were 57 and 50 per cent versus 84 and 66 per cent for late metachronous metastases (P = 0·293).ConclusionThe proportion of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer was consistent with that in earlier population‐based studies, as were resection rates for liver and lung metastases and survival after resection. Differentiation between synchronous, early and late metachronous metastases can improve assessment of resectability and survival.

MicroRNA profile in stage I clear cell renal cell carcinoma predicts progression to metastatic disease

ObjectiveThis study sought to identify microRNA (miRNA) profiles of small, pathologically confirmed stage 1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tumors that are associated with progression to metachronous metastatic disease. Materials and methodsFifty-five pathologic stage 1 ccRCC tumors ≤5cm, from 2 institutions, were examined in a miRNA screening, followed by a validation study. For the screening phase 752 miRNA were evaluated on each sample to identify those with differential expression between tumors that subsequently did (n = 10) or did not (n = 10) progress to metastatic disease. For the validation, 35 additional samples (20 nonprogressors and 15 with distant progression) were utilized to investigate 20 miRNA to determine if a miRNA panel could differentiate aggressive tumors: associations of miRNA expression with cancer specific survival was also investigated. ResultsIn the screening analysis, 35 miRNA were differentially expressed (P < 0.05, FDR < 0.1) between the groups. In the validation, 11 miRNA were confirmed to have differential expression. The miRNA -10a-5p, -23b-3p, and -26a-5p differentiated nonprogressive and distant progressive disease with a sensitivity of 73.3% and a specificity of 85% (AUC=0.893). In addition, levels of miR-30a-3p and -145-5p were identified as independent prognostic factors of cancer specific survival. ConclusionsThis investigation identified miRNA biomarkers that may differentiate between non-progressive ccRCC tumors and those that progress to metastatic disease in this group of stage I tumors. The miRNA profiles determined in this study have the potential to identify patients with small renal masses who are likely to have progressive ccRCC. Such information may be valuable to incorporate into predictive models.

Impact of primary tumour location on colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review

BACKGROUNDColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite significant advances in screening, surgical management and adjuvant therapies, average 5-year survival seldom exceeds 60% in most developed nations. Metastatic disease represents the primary cause of mortality in patients with CRC, and the liver is the most common location for distant tumour spread. Up to 25% of patients are found to have synchronous liver metastases at the time of diagnosis and a further 30%-40% will develop metachronous disease in the course of follow-up. It has been suggested that primary tumour location [right side versus left side, primary tumour location (PTL)] can influence oncological outcomes in this patient group and that this should be considered in prognostic models and therapeutic decision-making algorithms. This suggestion is not universally accepted and there have been conflicting reports in the literature to date.AIMTo provide a comprehensive summary of the available evidence regarding the impact of PTL on oncological outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM).METHODSMEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE were searched for relevant publications using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. Data on oncological outcomes was then extracted from full text articles that met the predefined inclusion criteria.RESULTSA total of 41 studies were identified that met predefined inclusion criteria for this review. In 21 out of 38 studies that provided data on overall survival, a statistically significant improvement in overall survival was reported in patients with left sided primary tumours. These studies included a total of 13897 patients compared with 4306 patients in the studies that did not show a significant difference. Eight studies noted a similar trend towards improved disease-free or progression-free survival. Several authors observed distinct patterns of relapse after treatment of hepatic metastases according to PTL; for example hepatic recurrence after treatment of CRCLM appears to occur more aggressively with right-sided CRC.CONCLUSIONTaken together, the findings of the present review indicate that PTL may have a role as an independent prognostic factor when determining treatment and disease surveillance strategies in CRC. The mechanisms responsible for this variation remain poorly understood, but are likely to relate to molecular, histological and embryological differences, as well as inherent differences in therapeutic sensitivity.

Prognostic importance of primary tumor resection and synchronous metastasis on overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: Data from the FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306) study.

4070 Background: The FIRE-3 study (AIO KRK-0306) was designed as a randomized multicenter trial to compare the efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (cet) to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) as first-line treatment in KRAS WT mCRC patients. FOLFIRI plus cet as first-line treatment of KRAS WT mCRC patients resulted in comparable overall response rates (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) when compared to FOLFIRI plus bev. Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the FOLFIRI plus cet arm. Methods: In the present analysis of the FIRE-3 trial we explored the impact of primary tumor resection on outcome in relation to anti-EGFR vs. anti-VEGF treatment. Furthermore, we investigated the prognostic value of synchronous versus metachronous metastases. Results: In patients with synchronous disease no significant difference in OS was detected when comparing resected (n=339) vs. non-resected (n=97) patients (p-value: 0.29, HR: 1.17, 95%-CI: 0.88 – 1.55). In the cetuximab arm, resection (n=167) showed no significant benefit in OS when compared to non-resection (n=52) (p-value: 0.51, HR: 1.15, 95%-CI: 0.77 – 1.71). Treated with bevacizumab, similar results were present, when comparing resection (n=172) vs. non-resection (n=45); (p-value: 0.29, HR: 1.25, 95%-CI: 0.83 – 1.9). A strong trend was seen when comparing OS in treatment arms cet. (n=219) vs. bev. (n=217)) for patients with synchronous disease; (p-value: 0.05, HR: 1,26, 95%-CI: 1.0 - 1.59). 436/592 pts suffered from synchronous, 153/592 from metachronous disease (in 3/592 pts the information was not given). Median OS in pts with synchronous disease was 24.5 months and 29.5 in pts with metachronous disease (p-value: 0.02, HR: 0.76, 95%-CI: 0.6 - 0.96). In pts treated in the cetuximab arm metachronous disease (n=77) was associated with a trend towards longer OS when compared to synchronous disease (n= 219) (p-value: 0.13, HR: 0.76, 95%-CI: 0.54 – 1.1). The same effect was present in the bevacizumab arm (p-value: 0.05, HR: 0.73, 95%-CI 0.53 – 1.0) when comparing pts with synchronous disease (n=217) vs. pts. with metachronous disease (n=76). Conclusions: In the FIRE-3 study, metachronous disease was associated with superior OS compared to synchronous disease. This finding was accentuated in the bevacizumab arm. The role of resection of the primary tumor had no impact on survival. Clinical trial information: NCT00433927 .

The role of response as predictor of improved outcome in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) patients (pts) treated with first-line Gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel (GemNab).

e16758 Background: GemNab is one of the first-line standard treatment (tx) of APC. To date, no predictive factors, both clinical and molecular, of benefit from this regimen exist. Two retrospective studies showed that early tumor shrinkage (ETS) can predict an improved outcome in APC pts receiving a first-line tx with FOLFIRINOX or GemNab. However, data regarding GemNab, limited to a small population of only 57 pts, seem to not confirm the association of ETS with a better outcome. Hence, we retrospectively analysed an homogeneous population of APC treated with first-line GemNab at our Institution, investigating the impact of several clinical factors, including response and ETS. Methods: APC pts receiving a first-line tx with GemNab were included in the analysis. The association of RECIST response and ETS with PFS and OS was evaluated. The following variables were collected: gender; age ( &gt; vs ≤ 55 years and ≥ vs &lt; 70 years ); baseline ECOG PS; Ca 19.9 baseline level (≥ vs &lt; 200); anamnesis of diabetes; site of primary tumor (head/uncinate process vs body/tail); locally A vs metastatic (m) PC; synchronous vs metachronous; number of m sites (1 vs &gt; 1); m sites (liver, peritoneum, lung, nodes); number of tx lines (1 vs &gt; 1). Univariate and multivariate analyses for PFS and OS were performed. Results: A total of 184 APC pts receiving first-line GemNab at our Institution from February 2014 to May 2019 were included in the analysis. RR and ETS were assessed in 174 and 168 pts, respectively. RR was 30%, disease control rate (DCR) 63% and ETS was 24%. Responders had a significant better PFS (12.5 vs 5.7 months, p &lt; 0.0001) and OS (25.1 vs 12.1 months, p &lt; 0.0001). ETS was significantly associated with improved PFS (12.3 vs 6.2 months, p &lt; 0.0001) and OS (24.0 vs 12.8 months, p &lt; 0.0001). At the multivariate analysis a significant association with survival parameters was confirmed for RECIST response, but not for ETS. At the multivariate analysis, also metachronous disease and number of tx lines &gt; 1 were independently associated with better OS. Conclusions: Despite its retrospective nature, this is one of the largest series of APC pts treated with first-line GemNab investigating the role of RECIST response and ETS in predicting outcome. On the basis of our results, RECIST response may be considered a positive prognostic factor, whereas ETS does not. In conclusion, achieving tumor shrinkage, not necessarily early, significantly delays PC progression and prolongs survival in pts treated with first-line GemNab.

Impact of Surveillance After Lobectomy for Lung Cancer on Disease Detection and Survival

IntroductionExisting guidelines for surveillance after non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment are inconsistent and have relatively sparse supporting literature. This study characterizes detection rates of metachronous and recurrent disease during surveillance with computed tomography scans after definitive treatment of early stage NSCLC. Materials and MethodsThe incidence of metachronous and recurrent disease in patients who previously underwent complete resection via lobectomy for stage IA NSCLC at a single center from 1996 to 2010 were evaluated. A subgroup analysis was used to compare survival of patients whose initial surveillance scan was 6 ± 3 months (early) versus 12 ± 3 months (late) after lobectomy. ResultsOf 294 eligible patients, 49 (17%) developed recurrent disease (14 local only, 35 distant), and 45 (15%) developed new NSCLC. Recurrent disease was found at a mean of 22 ± 19 months, and new primaries were found at a mean of 52 ± 31 months after lobectomy (P < .01). Five-year survival after diagnosis of recurrent disease was significantly lower than after diagnosis of second primaries (2.3% vs. 57.5%; P < .001). In the subgroup analysis of 187 patients, both disease detection on the initial scan (2% [2/94] vs. 4% [4/93]; P = .44) and 5-year survival (early, 80.8% vs. late, 86.7%; P = .61) were not significantly different between the early (n = 94) and the late (n = 93) groups. ConclusionSurveillance after lobectomy for stage IA NSCLC is useful for identifying both new primary as well as recurrent disease, but waiting to start surveillance until 12 ± 3 months after surgery is unlikely to miss clinically important findings.

Sequential Treatment with Bevacizumab and Aflibercept for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Real-World Clinical Practice.

Bevacizumab and aflibercept are currently the mainstay of antiangiogenic therapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). They are often used in sequence with first- and second-line chemotherapy, especially in patients with RAS-mutated tumours. The aim of the present study was to investigate the outcomes of patients with mCRC treated with the bevacizumab-aflibercept sequence in real-world clinical practice. Data from a national clinical registry of targeted therapies for mCRC were analysed retrospectively. Overall, there were 366 patients with valid data who received first-line treatment with bevacizumab and chemotherapy followed by aflibercept with chemotherapy. The majority of the patients (n = 296, 80.8%) had RAS mutated tumours. Median cumulative progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of the bevacizumab-containing regimen to progression on aflibercept was 18.2months (95% CI 16.8-19.5). Median PFS for bevacizumab and aflibercept was 10.6months (95% CI 9.5-11.7) and 5.6months (95% CI 5.1-6.1), respectively. Longer PFS on aflibercept was associated with metachronous metastatic disease and longer PFS on bevacizumab. Median overall survival (OS) from the start of first-line bevacizumab was 32.0months (95% CI 26.6-37.5). The presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis was associated with worse OS. Patients treated with aflibercept in real-world clinical practice achieved similar survival outcomes as those treated within randomised trials. Cumulative survival data provide a benchmark for future studies and enable indirect comparisons with other treatment sequences used in mCRC.

Synchronous Versus Metachronous Metastatic Disease: Impact of Time to Metastasis on Patient Outcome—Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium

BackgroundPatients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) may present with primary metastases (synchronous disease) or develop metastases during follow-up (metachronous disease). The impact of time to metastasis on patient outcome is poorly characterised. ObjectiveTo characterise overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) based on time to metastasis in mRCC patients treated with targeted therapy (tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKIs]). Design, setting, and participantsWe used the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) to compare synchronous (metastases within ≤3 mo of initial diagnosis of cancer) versus metachronous disease (evaluated by >3–12 mo, >1–2 yr, >2–7 yr, and >7 yr intervals). Outcome measurements and statistical analysisOS and TFF were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox multivariable regressions analyses (MVAs) were adjusted for baseline factors. Results and limitationsOf 7386 patients with mRCC treated with first-line TKIs, 3906 (53%) and 3480 (47%) had synchronous and metachronous metastasis, respectively. More patients with synchronous versus metachronous disease had higher T stage (T1–2: 19% vs 34%), N1 disease (21% vs 6%), presence of sarcomatoid differentiation (15.8% vs 7.9%), Karnofsky performance status <80 (25.9% vs 15.1%), anaemia (62.5% vs 42.3%), elevated neutrophils (18.9% vs 10.9%), elevated platelets (21.6% vs 11.4%), bone metastases (40.4% vs 29.8%), and IMDC poor risk (40.6% vs 11.3%). Synchronous versus metachronous disease by intervals >3–12 mo, >1–2 yr, >2–7 yr, and >7 yr correlated with poor TTF (5.6 mo vs 7.3, 8.0, 10.8, and 13.3 mo, p < 0.0001) and poor OS (median 16.7 mo vs 23.8, 30.2, 34.8, and 41.7 mo, p < 0.0001). In MVAs, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 1.00 (reference), 0.98 (0.90–1.06), 0.81 (0.73–0.91), 0.74 (0.68–0.81), and 0.60 (0.54–0.67), respectively, for OS (p < 0.0001), and 1.00 (reference), 0.99 (0.92–1.06), 0.98 (0.90–1.07), 0.83 (0.77–0.89), and 0.66 (0.60–0.72), respectively, for TTF (p < 0.0001). Data were collected retrospectively. ConclusionsTiming of metastases after initial RCC diagnosis may impact the outcomes from targeted therapy in mRCC. Patient summaryWe looked at the impact of the timing of metastatic outbreak on survival outcomes in kidney cancer patients treated with targeted therapy. We found that the longer time to metastatic development was associated with improved outcome.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver resection for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

147 Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer related deaths with liver being most common site of CRC metastasis. More than 50% of the CRC patients will develop metastatic liver lesion that eventually leads to death in about 70% of them. In this retrospective review we reviewed the outcome of pts who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection of liver lesion for metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: 304 pts who had preoperative chemotherapy were identified from 1045 metastatic colorectal cancer patients who had liver metastasectomy at Mayo Clinic between 1997 and 2018. A retrospective review was conducted by using data from electronic medical records. Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: There were 113 (37%) female and 191 (63%) male pts. Median age at primary disease diagnosis was 56.5 yrs. Two hundred forty-nine pts presented with stage IV metastatic colorectal cancer. Primary tumor locations were: 53 right-sided, 117 left-sided and 133 rectum. 152 (50%) pts had extrahepatic metastases. Two pts were found to be MSI-H, 113 MSS, 189 unknown. BRAF mutation was found in 6 patients. RAS mutation was present in 84 patients, with 124 unknown. Pts received chemotherapy for median of 2.82 months. Single agent fluoropyrimidine was administered in 38 (12%) pts and rest receiving chemotherapy doublet or triplet with fluropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin being most common regimen. The median overall survival from primary diagnosis for the entire group was 74.5 months. Median overall survival from liver metastasectomy was 60.0 months. In univariate analysis, metachronous disease, age &lt; 60 yrs, and an absence of extrahepatic lesions led to statistically significant improvement of overall survival from primary diagnosis. Metachronous and extrahepatic lesions remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver metastasectomy is beneficial for highly-selected metastatic colorectal cancer pts. Compared to a historical control of 30-36 months, our patient population had a median overall survival of about 5 years from resection.

Characterisation and classification of oligometastatic disease: a European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus recommendation

Oligometastatic disease has been proposed as an intermediate state between localised and systemically metastasised disease. In the absence of randomised phase 3 trials, early clinical studies show improved survival when radical local therapy is added to standard systemic therapy for oligometastatic disease. However, since no biomarker for the identification of patients with true oligometastatic disease is clinically available, the diagnosis of oligometastatic disease is based solely on imaging findings. A small number of metastases on imaging could represent different clinical scenarios, which are associated with different prognoses and might require different treatment strategies. 20 international experts including 19 members of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer OligoCare project developed a comprehensive system for characterisation and classification of oligometastatic disease. We first did a systematic review of the literature to identify inclusion and exclusion criteria of prospective interventional oligometastatic disease clinical trials. Next, we used a Delphi consensus process to select a total of 17 oligometastatic disease characterisation factors that should be assessed in all patients treated with radical local therapy for oligometastatic disease, both within and outside of clinical trials. Using a second round of the Delphi method, we established a decision tree for oligometastatic disease classification together with a nomenclature. We agreed oligometastatic disease as the overall umbrella term. A history of polymetastatic disease before diagnosis of oligometastatic disease was used as the criterion to differentiate between induced oligometastatic disease (previous history of polymetastatic disease) and genuine oligometastatic disease (no history of polymetastatic disease). We further subclassified genuine oligometastatic disease into repeat oligometastatic disease (previous history of oligometastatic disease) and de-novo oligometastatic disease (first time diagnosis of oligometastatic disease). In de-novo oligometastatic disease, we differentiated between synchronous and metachronous oligometastatic disease. We did a final subclassification into oligorecurrence, oligoprogression, and oligopersistence, considering whether oligometastatic disease is diagnosed during a treatment-free interval or during active systemic therapy and whether or not an oligometastatic lesion is progressing on current imaging. This oligometastatic disease classification and nomenclature needs to be prospectively evaluated by the OligoCare study.

Ovarian tumors in children: how common are lesion recurrence and metachronous disease? A UK CCLG Surgeons Cancer Group nationwide study

BackgroundOvarian tumors in children are rare, mature teratoma being the most common histological entity. Robust guidelines to aid patient follow-up after resection are distinctly lacking. Although mature teratoma has a very good prognosis following complete resection, small studies have reported the occurrence of metachronous disease and recurrence to a variable degree (2.5–23% of patients). Nevertheless, there are surgeons who recommend no follow-up is required for these children after primary tumor resection. We investigated the incidence of (i) recurrence and (ii) metachronous disease in pediatric patients following ovarian tumor resection. MethodsRetrospective multicenter study amongst UK pediatric surgical oncology centers. Females <16 years with diagnosis of ovarian tumor from 2006 to 2016 were included. Functional/neonatal ovarian cysts were excluded. ResultsThree hundred ten patients with ovarian tumors treated at 12 surgical oncology centers were identified. Mean age at surgery was 11 years [IQR 8–14]. Most common diagnosis were mature teratoma (57%, 177 cases), immature teratoma (10.9%, 34 cases) and serous cystadenoma (7.7%, 24 cases). 8.1% (25 cases) of all females were identified with tumor recurrence/ metachronous disease. 5.1% (9 cases) of patients with mature teratoma had recurrent/ metachronous disease. Most of these patients were diagnosed at routine clinic follow-up. ConclusionOur study clearly shows that ovarian tumor recurrence(s) and metachronous disease occur, even in “benign” ovarian tumors. We recommend female pediatric patients should have robust follow-up care plans after primary diagnosis and resection of ovarian tumor(s). Level of Evidence StatementThis is a level II evidence study. It is a retrospective multicentre collaborative study which summarizes data from a national cohort of children.

Multiple Pulmonary Resections for Synchronous and Metachronous Lung Cancer at Two Chinese Centers

To determine oncologic and surgical outcomes after multiple pulmonary resections (MPR) for synchronous or metachronous lung cancer with multiple pulmonary sites of involvement and to identify prognostic factors for these patients. We retrospectively analyzed data from two Chinese high-volume institutions. Eligible patients underwent MPR for synchronous or metachronous lung cancer with multiple pulmonary sites of involvement. Overall survival and disease-free survival after MPR were analyzed, and prognostic factors were explored using multivariable Cox analysis. Postoperative mortality and major morbidities within 30 days were evaluated. In total, 142 patients were included: 36 (25%) underwent MPR for the metachronous disease, and 106 (75%) underwent MPR for the synchronous disease. Five-year disease-free survival was 85.4% for the metachronous group and 69.1% for the synchronous group; 5-year overall survival was 86.1% and 84.8%, respectively. Five-year accumulated local and distant recurrence rates were 11.9% and 3.0% for the metachronous group and 26.6% and 5.9% for the synchronous group, respectively. In the synchronous MPR group, a larger sum of tumor size (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.08) and regional nodal involvement (HR 6.17; 95% CI, 1.42 to 35.46) were both independently associated with worse overall survival. In the metachronous MPR group, the longer disease-free interval was independently associated with favorable overall survival (HR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88 to 0.98) and disease-free survival (HR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93 to 0.99). There was no 30-day mortality. The overall rate of major morbidities was 12%. Multiple pulmonary resection is valid for patients with synchronous and metachronous lung cancer with multiple pulmonary sites of involvement.