Metachronous Colorectal Cancer Research Articles

Associations between pathological features and risk of metachronous colorectal cancer.

Survivors of colorectal cancer (CRC) are at risk of developing another primary colorectal cancer - metachronous CRC. Understanding which pathological features of the first tumour are associated with risk of metachronous CRC might help tailor existing surveillance guidelines. Population-based CRC cases were recruited from the United States, Canada and Australia between 1997 and 2012 and followed prospectively until 2022 by the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Metachronous CRC was defined as a new primary CRC diagnosed at least 1 year after the initial CRC. Those with the genetic cancer predisposition Lynch syndrome or MUTYH mutation carriers were excluded. Cox regression models were fitted to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations. Of 6085 CRC cases, 138 (2.3%) were diagnosed with a metachronous CRC over a median follow-up time of 12 years (incidence: 2.0 per 1000 person-years). CRC cases with a synchronous CRC were 3.4-fold more likely to develop a metachronous CRC (adjusted HR: 3.36, 95% CI: 1.89-5.98) than those without a synchronous tumour. CRC cases with MMR-deficient tumours had a 72% increased risk of metachronous CRC (adjusted HR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.11-2.64) compared to those with MMR-proficient tumours. Compared to cases who had an adenocarcinoma histologic type, those with an undifferentiated histologic type were 77% less likely to develop a metachronous CRC (adjusted HR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.06-0.94). Existing surveillance guidelines for CRC survivors could be updated to include increased surveillance for those whose first CRC was diagnosed with a synchronous CRC or was MMR-deficient.

Abstract 5525: Tissue-resident cytotoxic T cell infiltration predicts metachronous colorectal cancer metastasis

Abstract Background: Identifying patients at high risk for metachronous colorectal cancer metastasis is essential for improving prognosis. The balance between host immune regulation and tumor immune evasion ultimately permits or prevents cancer progression. Lymphocytic infiltration in colorectal cancer can predict long-term clinical outcomes. However, these lymphocytes' origin, subtype and function have yet to be adequately explored. We investigated the association between the development of metastasis and CD8+T cells expressing the integrin protein CD103, a marker of tissue-resident memory T cells. Methods: In this retrospective, case-control matched study, we conducted multiplex immunofluorescence staining of tumor samples from 124 patients with colorectal cancer. Tissue microarrays containing representative cores of the central tumor, invasive margin, and adjacent normal tissue were immunostained for CD3, CD8, CD103, pSMAD3, and cytokeratin, using tyramide signal amplification. Cells were quantified using StrataQuest digital image analysis software, with intratumoral and stromal regions analyzed separately. Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance with subsequent Dunn’s test for pair-wise comparisons was performed using the Bonferroni method of multiple-comparison correction. Results: Central tumor and invasive margin CD3+ densities were associated with synchronous metastasis. Compared to non-metastatic patients, those who went on to develop metachronous metastasis (n=42) had a low proportion of intra-epithelial CD8+CD103+ T cells at the central tumor (non-metastatic: 32.8%, IQR 15.0-42.7%; metachronous metastasis: 12.9%, IQR 2.08-28.4%; P = 0.013). Similarly, patients with metachronous metastasis had a low proportion of stromal CD8+CD103+ T cells at the invasive margin (non-metastatic: 3.51%, IQR 1.83-6.55%; metachronous metastasis: 1.75%, IQR 0.62-3.72%; P = 0.019). On multivariate Cox regression of histological features, amongst patients with metastasis, significant overall survival prognostic markers included a low proportional CD8+CD103+ T cell infiltration (HR 2.41, 95%CI 1.16-5.01, P = 0.019), mucinous features (HR 4.28, 95%CI 1.98-9.24, P < 0.001), and the presence of perineural invasion (HR 2.75, 95%CI 1.28-5.89, P < 0.001). Conclusion: CD8+CD103+ lymphocytes may protect from the development of colorectal metastasis. Proportional CD8+CD103+ T cell infiltration is a promising prognostic marker in colorectal adenocarcinoma for the development of metachronous metastasis, and, amongst patients with metastasis, it is a prognostic marker of overall survival. Citation Format: Ryan Cohen, Tracey Lee-Pullen, Timothy Miller, Shadi Pirasteh, Cameron Platell, Katie Meehan, Kathy Fuller, Melanie McCoy. Tissue-resident cytotoxic T cell infiltration predicts metachronous colorectal cancer metastasis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5525.

Risk of metachronous colorectal cancer after surgical resection of index rectal cancer in Lynch syndrome: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan.

This study evaluated the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) after resection of index (first) rectal cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome (LS). Clinicopathological data of patients with genetically proven LS were retrospectively analyzed in this multicenter Japanese study. The cumulative incidence of metachronous CRC and the overall survival were compared between patients with index rectal cancer (rectal group) and those with index colon cancer (colon group). The median age at index CRC surgery was lower in the rectal group than in the colon group (37 vs. 46years old, P = 0.01). The cumulative 5-, 10-, and 20-year incidences of metachronous CRC were 3.5%, 13.9%, and 21.1%, respectively, in the rectal cancer group and 14.9%, 22.0%, and 57.9%, respectively, in the colon cancer group (P = 0.02). The overall survival curves were not significantly different between two groups (P = 0.23). This is the first report from an East Asian country to report the risk of metachronous CRC after resection of index rectal cancer in patients with LS. Despite this study having several limitations, we cannot recommend extended resection, such as total proctocolectomy, for index rectal cancer as a standard surgical treatment in patients with LS.

Incidence of late recurrence and second primary cancers 5-10 years after non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

The fraction of patients who are cancer-free survivors 5 years after curative-intended surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing, suggesting that extending surveillance beyond 5 years may be indicated. Here we estimate the incidence of late recurrence, metachronous CRC, and second primary cancers 5-10 years postoperative. All patients resected for UICC stage I-III CRC in Denmark through 2004-2013 were identified. Through individual-level linkage of nationwide health registry data, recurrence status was determined using a validated algorithm. Cancer-free survivors 5 years after surgery, were included. Cumulative incidence functions (CIF) of late recurrence, metachronous CRC, and second primary cancer 5-10 years postoperative were constructed. Subdistribution hazards ratios (sHR) were computed using Fine-Gray regression. Among 8883 patients, 370 developed late recurrence (5-10-year CIF = 4.1%, 95%CI: 3.7%-4.6%), 270 metachronous CRC (5-10-year CIF = 3.0%, 95%CI: 2.7%-3.4%), and 635 a second primary cancer (5-10-year CIF = 7.2%, 95%CI: 6.7%-7.7%). The risk of late recurrence was reduced for patients operated in 2009-2013 compared to 2004-2008 (2.9% vs. 5.6%, sHR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.42-0.65). The risk of metachronous CRC was likewise reduced from 4.1% to 2.1% (sHR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.39-0.65). While the risk of second primary cancer did not change between 2009-2013 and 2004-2008 (7.1% vs. 7.1%, sHR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.84-1.15). Using nation-wide 10-year follow-up data, we document that the incidences of late recurrence and metachronous CRC are low and decreasing from 2004 to 2013. Thus, despite increasing numbers of long-term cancer survivors, the data do not advocate for extending CRC-specific surveillance beyond 5 years.

The diagnostic yield of colonoscopic surveillance following resection of early age onset colorectal cancer.

The primary benefit of post-colorectal cancer (CRC) colonoscopic surveillance is to detect and remove premalignant lesions to prevent metachronous CRC. Current guidelines for long-term colonoscopic surveillance post early age onset CRC (EOCRC) resection are based on limited evidence. The aims of this study were to assess the diagnostic yield of colonoscopic surveillance post-EOCRC resection and identify molecular and clinicopathological risk factors associated with advanced neoplasia. A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data was conducted at St Mark's hospital, London, United Kingdom, for patients diagnosed with EOCRC who underwent at least one episode of post-CRC colonoscopic surveillance between 1978 and 2022. We collected clinicopathological data including tumour molecular status and neoplasia detection rates. In total, 908 colonoscopic surveillance procedures were performed in 195 patients over 2581.3 person-years of follow-up. The diagnostic yields of metachronous CRC, advanced adenomas and non-advanced adenomas were 1.76%, 3.41% and 22.69% respectively. Sixteen patients (8.21%) developed metachronous CRC, and the majority (87.5%) were detected more than 3years post index EOCRC diagnosis. Detection of advanced neoplasia was significantly higher in EOCRC patients with Lynch syndrome (26.15%) compared with those in whom Lynch syndrome was excluded (13.13%) (OR, 2.343; 95% CI, 1.014-5.256; p=0.0349). During colonoscopic surveillance post-EOCRC resection, the long-term risk of developing metachronous advanced neoplasia remains high in the context of Lynch syndrome, but this trend is not as clearly evident when Lynch syndrome has been excluded.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of synchronous and metachronous colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

To investigate the clinicopathological features and prognosis of synchronous and metachronous multiple primary colorectal cancer. Patients who underwent operation for synchronous and metachronous colorectal cancer at the colorectal surgery department of Shanghai Changhai Hospital between January 2000 and December 2021 were included. Perioperative indicators were comprehensively compared and included in the survival analyses. In total, 563 patients with synchronous ( n =372) and metachronous ( n =191) colorectal cancer were included. Patients with synchronous colorectal cancer were more likely to have a long onset time, positive carcinoembryonic antigen, advanced TNM stage, large tumor, perineural invasion, p53 high expression, and mismatch repair proficient. Compared with metachronous colorectal cancer, patients with synchronous colorectal cancer showed worse 5-year overall survival (68.6±3.0% vs 81.9±3.5%, P =0.018) and 5-year disease-free survival (61.2±3.1% vs 71.0±3.9%, P =0.022). In the subgroup analysis, segmental resection was an independent risk factor for the long-term outcomes of bilateral synchronous colorectal cancer. Clinicopathological and molecular features were different between synchronous and metachronous colorectal cancer. Patients with synchronous colorectal cancer showed a worse prognosis than those with metachronous colorectal cancer. Bilateral synchronous colorectal cancer requires extended resection to achieve improved long-term outcomes.

Risk factors for metachronous colorectal cancer and advanced neoplasia following primary colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundIdentifying risk factors for metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) and metachronous advanced neoplasia could be useful for guiding surveillance. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate risk factors for metachronous CRC and advanced neoplasia.MethodsSearches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials for articles (searching period: 1945 to Feburary, 2021) that reported the results of an association between any factor and metachronous advanced neoplasia or metachronous CRC. There were no restrictions on the publication date or language. Random effects models were fitted to estimate the combined association between the risk factors and metachronous CRC or advanced neoplasia. The Risk of Bias In Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions tool (ROBINS-I) was used to assess the risk of bias of included studies.ResultsIn total, 22 observational studies with 625,208 participants were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Of these, 13 studies investigated risk factors for metachronous CRC and 9 for advanced neoplasia. The risks of metachronous CRC or advanced neoplasia were higher if the first CRC was diagnosed in the presence of a synchronous advanced lesion (pooled risk ratio (RR) from 3 studies: 3.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44–9.05; and pooled RR from 8 studies: 2.77, 95% CI: 2.23–3.43, respectively). The risk of metachronous CRC was lower, but the risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia was higher if the first CRC was distal (compared with proximal) (pooled RR from 3 studies: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.23–0.98; and pooled RR from 2 studies: 2.99, 95% CI: 1.60–5.58 respectively). The risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia increased with age (pooled RR from 3 studies: 1.07 per year of age, 95% CI: 1.03–1.11). There was no evidence that any lifestyle risk factors studied were associated with the risk of metachronous CRC or advanced neoplasia.ConclusionsThe identified risk factors for metachronous CRC and advanced neoplasia might be useful to tailor the existing surveillance guidelines after the first CRC. There were potential limitations due to possible misclassification of the outcome, confounding and risk of bias, and the findings cannot be generalised to high-risk genetic syndrome cases.

Prognostic potential of whole exome sequencing in the clinical management of metachronous colorectal cancer liver metastases

BackgroundColorectal cancer is a highly prevalent and deadly. The most common metastatic site is the liver. We performed a whole exome sequencing analysis of a series of metachronous colorectal cancer liver metastases (mCLM) and matched non-malignant liver tissues to investigate the genomic profile of mCLM and explore associations with the patients’ prognosis and therapeutic modalities.MethodsDNA samples from mCLM and non-malignant liver tissue pairs (n = 41) were sequenced using whole exome target enrichment and their germline and somatic genetic variability, copy number variations, and mutational signatures were assessed for associations with relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsOur genetic analysis could stratify all patients into existing targeted therapeutic regimens. The most commonly mutated genes in mCLM were TP53, APC, and KRAS together with PIK3CA and several passenger genes like ABCA13, FAT4, PCLO, and UNC80. Patients with somatic alterations in genes from homologous recombination repair, Notch, and Hedgehog pathways had significantly prolonged RFS, while those with altered MYC pathway genes had poor RFS. Additionally, alterations in the JAK-STAT pathway were prognostic of longer OS. Patients bearing somatic variants in VIPR2 had significantly shorter OS and those with alterations in MUC16 prolonged OS. Carriage of the KRAS-12D variant was associated with shortened survival in our and external datasets. On the other hand, tumor mutation burden, mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability, mutational signatures, or copy number variation in mCLM had no prognostic value.ConclusionsThe results encourage further molecular profiling for personalized treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases discerning metachronous from synchronous scenarios.

Features of synchronous and metachronous dual primary gastric and colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND Studies evaluating the characteristics of dual primary gastric and colorectal cancer (CRC) (DPGCC) are limited. AIM To analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of synchronous and metachronous cancers in patients with DPGCC. METHODS From October 2010 to August 2021, patients with DPGCC were retrospectively reviewed. The patients with DPGCC were divided into two groups (synchronous and metachronous). We compared the overall survival (OS) between the groups using Kaplan-Meier survival methods. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox’s proportional hazards model to identify the independent prognostic factors for OS. RESULTS Of the 76 patients with DPGCC, 46 and 30 had synchronous and metachronous cancers, respectively. The proportion of unresectable CRC in patients with synchronous cancers was higher than that in patients with metachronous cancers (28.3% vs 3.3%, P = 0.015). The majority of the second primary cancers had occurred within 5 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the patients with metachronous cancers had a better prognosis than patients with synchronous cancers (P = 0.010). The patients who had undergone gastrectomy (P < 0.001) or CRC resection (P < 0.001) had a better prognosis than those who had not. In the multivariate analysis, synchronous cancer [hazard ratio (HR) = 6.8, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 2.0-22.7, P = 0.002)] and stage III-IV gastric cancer (GC) [HR = 10.0, 95%CI: 3.4-29.5, P < 0.001)] were risk prognostic factor for OS, while patients who underwent gastrectomy was a protective prognostic factor for OS [HR = 0.2, 95%CI: 0.1-0.6, P = 0.002]. CONCLUSION Regular surveillance for metachronous cancer is necessary during postoperative follow-up. Surgical resection is the mainstay of therapy to improve the prognosis of DPGCC. The prognosis appears to be influenced by the stage of GC rather than the stage of CRC. Patients with synchronous cancer have a worse prognosis, and its treatment strategy is worth further exploration.

Risk Prediction of Metachronous Colorectal Cancer from Molecular Features of Adenomas: A Nested Case-Control Study.

Identifying new biomarkers may improve prediction of me-CRC for individuals with adenomas and optimize surveillance intervals to reduce risk of colorectal cancer and reduce oversurveillance of patients with low risk of colorectal cancer. Use of DNA CNAs alone does not improve prediction of me-CRC. Further research to improve risk classification is required.

627P Racial disparities in synchronous and metachronous colorectal and prostate cancer: SEER based study 2000-2020

627P Racial disparities in synchronous and metachronous colorectal and prostate cancer: SEER based study 2000-2020

Metachronous colorectal cancer risk according to Lynch syndrome pathogenic variant after extensive versus partial colectomy in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study

Extensive colectomy (subtotal or total colectomy) is often advised for carriers of Lynch syndrome with colorectal cancer. However, the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer might differ by Lynch syndrome variant, meaning that partial colectomy, which has better functional outcomes, might be adequate for some patients with low-risk variants. We aimed to assess the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer after partial colectomy and extensive colectomy in carriers of Lynch syndrome with different pathogenic variants. For this retrospective cohort study, carriers of Lynch syndrome with colorectal cancer in the Netherlands were identified by linkage of the Dutch Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumors (StOET) database and the Dutch Nationwide Network and Registry of Histopathology and Cytopathology (PALGA) database. Data on demographics, Lynch syndrome variants, colorectal cancers, surgery types, mortality, and surveillance colonoscopies were extracted. Data on colorectal cancer and surveillance colonoscopies were updated until Feb 28, 2022. Data on survival status was updated until Feb 7, 2022. MLH1, MSH2, and EPCAM were classified as high-risk variants and MSH6 and PMS2 as low-risk variants. Patients for whom the type of surgery was unknown were excluded. Cox regression time-to-event analyses were done to assess the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer in four subgroups based on pathogenic variant (high-risk vs low-risk variants) and the extent of surgery (extensive colectomy vs partial colectomy). Sex, age at the time of primary colorectal cancer, primary colorectal cancer stage, performance of surveillance colonoscopies, adherence to the surveillance guidelines, and time period of primary colorectal cancer diagnosis were added to the model as possible confounders. Metachronous colorectal cancer was defined as colorectal cancer diagnosed more than 6 months after the primary colorectal cancer. Patients were censored at time of death or assembly of the database. Of 1908 carriers of Lynch syndrome registered in StOET, 532 with a history of colorectal cancer were identified after linkage with PALGA. Five carriers were excluded because of an unknown surgery type, leaving 527 in our sample (mean age at primary colorectal cancer 48·7 years [SD 12·1]; 274 [52%] male and 253 [48%] female). 121 (23%) patients developed metachronous colorectal cancer (median time from primary colorectal cancer to metachronous colorectal cancer 11·0 years [IQR 2·1-17·8]). Metachronous colorectal cancer occurred in 12 (12%) of 97 patients with high-risk variants and extensive colectomy, in 85 (32%) of 267 patients with high-risk variants and partial colectomy, in zero (0%) of 11 patients with low-risk variants and extensive colectomy, and in 24 (16%) of 152 patients with low-risk variants and partial colectomy. Partial colectomy was associated with a higher risk of metachronous colorectal cancer than extensive colectomy in the high-risk variant group (hazard ratio 1·97, 95% CI 1·04-3·73; p=0·039). The risk of metachronous colorectal cancer did not differ between carriers of low-risk variants who had partial colectomy and those of high-risk variants who had extensive colectomy (1·14, 0·55-2·36; p=0·72). The risk of metachronous colorectal cancer after partial colectomy in carriers of low-risk variants is similar to the risk after extensive colectomy in carriers of high-risk variants. This finding suggests that partial colectomy followed by endoscopic surveillance is an appropriate management approach to treat colorectal cancer in carriers of low-risk Lynch syndrome variants. None.

Synchronous and metachronous primary colorectal cancers with concordant and discordant mismatch repair status

Multiple primary colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) synchronous, when detected approximately at the same time, or metachronous, when a significant amount of time has elapsed between diagnoses can show both mismatch repair (MMR) status concordance and discordance between primary tumors. The aim was to evaluate the MMR status of a monoinstitutional, retrospective cohort of synchronous and metachronous CRCs, with a focus on the frequency of cases with discordant MMR status, and explore the MMR status of metastatic nodal deposits. All synchronous and metachronous CRCs diagnosed in our institution between 2011 and 2023 were collected. Clinicopathologic characteristics were evaluated, including MMR status of all CRCs, BRAF mutation, and MLH1 promoter methylation analyses. MMR status discordant cases were further analyzed, and MMR testing was performed on nodal metastases. Of 3671 patients, 107 (2.9%) had multiple CRCs (94 synchronous and 13 metachronous; total number of CRCs 220). Sixty CRCs were MMR deficient (dMMR) (27.3%), and most were right-sided and high-grade and showed special histologic features (P<.00001). Ninety-three patients showed intertumoral MMR concordance: 70 (65.4%) with MMR-proficient (pMMR) CRCs, and 23 (21.5%) were dMMR. Fourteen patients (13.1%) showed intertumoral MMR discordance (at least one dMMR and one pMMR), and in 5 patients, nodal metastases were present: 2 patients harbored metastases only from their pMMR cancer, 2 only from their dMMR cancer, and in 1 patient both pMMR and dMMR metastases were present. In conclusion, all multiple primary CRCs should be analyzed for MMR status as discordant MMR is possible as well as discordant metastatic nodal deposits, and this may be important for patient management.

Assessment of Incidence of Metachronous Neoplasms after Surgical Resection of Colorectal Cancer

Abstract Background Cancer colon is the second most common cause of cancer in women and the third most common in men. Globally incidences vary 10-fold with highest rates in Australia, New Zealand, Europe and the US and lowest rates in Africa and South-Central Asia. However, in Egypt, CRC represent 4.2% of all cancers in male and 3.8% in females. Aim of the Work The aim of our study was to assess the incidence of Metachronous neoplasms after curative surgical resection of colorectal cancer and assess different risk factors for metachronous Cancer colon occurrence. Patients and Methods We enrolled 100 patients in this retrospective cohort study to predict incidence and risk factors of metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) after 6 months of curative surgical resection of colorectal cancer. Results After 6 months of post-operative follow up, 90% of cases had no recurrence of CRC, 5% had polyps and did polypectomy, 5% had mass lesion. So patients were divided into two groups, Group (1) included patients with no recurrent CRC. Group (2) included patients with recurrent CRC. The incidence of metachronous CRC was 5% for mass and 5% for polyps in patients who underwent curative surgical resection of colorectal cancer. In both Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis for the parameters affecting recurrent mass, DM was the only significant risk factor associated with the incidence of metachronous CRC with P values (0.043, 0.049) respectively. Conclusion The incidence of metachronous CRC in this study was 5% for mass and 5% for polyps in patients who underwent curative surgical resection of colorectal cancer. DM is a significant risk factor of metachronous CRC.

Aspirin chemoprevention in colorectal cancer: network meta-analysis of low, moderate, and high doses.

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer, with nearly 2 million cases worldwide and just under 1 million deaths in 2020. Several trials have demonstrated that aspirin has the potential to reduce the incidence and/or recurrence of colorectal cancer; however, the optimal aspirin dose is unclear. Relevant studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library from database inception to 2 February 2022. Data from RCTs in which the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients without active colorectal cancer assigned to aspirin versus control were included. Two investigators independently identified studies and abstracted data. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias 2 tool. The study was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Aspirin dose was stratified into low (50-163 mg/day), mid (164-325 mg/day), and high (500-1200 mg/day). Thirteen articles representing 11 RCTs (92 550 participants) were included, with studies assessing aspirin as primary prophylaxis in general or high-risk populations, and as secondary prophylaxis for metachronous colorectal cancer. There was a statistically significant reduction in colorectal cancer incidence in the high-dose aspirin group compared with the group that received no aspirin or placebo (OR 0.69, 95 per cent credible interval 0.50 to 0.96; surface under the cumulative ranking 0.82). There was no statistically significant difference between mid- and low-dose aspirin versus no aspirin/placebo. In this network meta-analysis of RCTs, high-dose aspirin was associated with a reduction in colorectal cancer incidence. However, this was based on a limited number of trials. This study did not show a statistically significant risk reduction in colorectal cancer incidence with mid- or low-dose aspirin.

Metachronous colorectal cancer metastasis: Who, what, when and what to do about it.

Metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis occurs due to micrometastatic disease, in up to 23% of patients who have undergone curative-intent treatment. Metachronous metastasis tends to occur within 2 years of initial treatment. Diagnosis relies on posttreatment surveillance strategies. Care for patients with metachronous CRC metastasis is complex and requires careful multidisciplinary consideration. Those with isolated and technically resectable diseases are recommended to undergo metastasectomy with adjunct chemotherapy, however, survival, even after curative-intent resection, is poor.

Accuracy of a faecal immunochemical test in patients under colonoscopy surveillance of colorectal adenoma and cancer.

Surveillance of colorectal neoplasia place great strain on colonoscopy resources, and faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are under-investigated for this purpose. The aim of this study was to report the outcome of FIT among patients scheduled for post-polypectomy and post-resection colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance. Patients scheduled for colonoscopy surveillance at five endoscopy units in mid-Sweden in 2016-2020 were eligible. They provided a faecal sample from 2 separate days, which were analysed by iFOBT QuikRead go® (Aidian Oy). Both the colonoscopies, and the FIT analyses were conducted by staff blinded to the other. Out of 216 included patients, 157 (73%) underwent both a complete colonoscopy and had at least one FIT analysed prior to the examination. The indication for surveillance was previous adenoma in 69 (44%) and post-resection CRC in 88 (56%) patients. Two (1%) in the CRC surveillance group were diagnosed with a metachronous CRC, whereas 49 (56%) patients in the CRC surveillance, and 17 (25%) in the adenoma group had no pathology identified at colonscopy (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients diagnosed with adenomas requiring surveillance according to European Society of Gastrointestinal Society (ESGE) guidelines 2020 was 6 (7%) in the post-CRC resection versus 7 (10%) in the adenoma surveillance group (P = 0.4). Based on one FIT and at cut-off 10 µg Hb/g, sensitivity for CRC was 100%, specificity 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77-89), Positive Predictive Value (PPV) 7% (-2 to 16) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) 100%. All patients with an adenoma requiring surveillance had a FIT below this cut-off. Adding a second FIT decreased the specificity. Larger studies to evaluate the accuracy and consequences of using FIT for surveillance of colorectal neoplasia are needed. FIT may be more interesting for post-resection CRC surveillance than follow-up of adenoma.

Comparison of synchronous neoplasms at colonoscopic diagnosis of early-onset versus average-onset colorectal cancer.

3623 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence has steadily increased in adults younger than 50 years (EO-CRC) since the 1990s, with a predominance in the left colon and rectum. Precursor lesions of CRCs are adenomas, including advanced adenomas, and sessile serrated polyps. Given that neoplastic development is age-related, we hypothesized that patients with early-onset CRC (EO-CRC) may have fewer adenomas compared to patients with average-onset CRC (AO-CRC) at diagnosis. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of electronic health records at Mayo Clinic or Mayo Health System [2012 to 2021] and randomly selected 150 patients with EO-CRC who met eligibility criteria and matched them with 150 AO-CRC patients based on gender and colonoscopy indication. Known hereditary syndromes or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. At colonoscopy where CRC was diagnosed, we recorded findings of adenomas, advanced adenomas (&gt; 1 cm, villous histology, or high-grade dysplasia), and sessile serrated polyps (SSP). Results: Median age at diagnosis was 43 years for EO-CRC and 67 years for AO-CRC. No significant differences in BMI, family history of CRC, MMR, BRAFV 600E KRAS status or SSPs were found between groups (all p &gt; 0.05). Among patients with colon cancer, no difference was found for adenoma number yet patients with EO-colon cancer (EO-CC) had larger polyps [median of 10 mm vs 5 mm, p = 0.001] (Table) compared with AO-colon cancer (AO-CC). At least 1 adenoma was found in 56% and 47% of patients with EO-CC and AO-CC, respectively. Moreover, advanced adenomas were significantly more common in the EO-CC group compared with the AO-CC group (42% and 14%, p &lt; 0.001) [ Table]. Among patients with rectal cancer, non-advanced adenomas were less frequent and although advanced adenoma were similar in frequency, they were more commonly located in the rectum in EO-rectal compared to AO-rectal cancers (Table). Conclusions: Patients with EO-colon cancer had a significantly higher likelihood of a synchronous advanced adenoma in the colon compared to those with AO-CRC. Together, these data suggest accelerated carcinogenesis throughout the colorectum in early onset patients, with increased risk for development of synchronous and metachronous CRC. [Table: see text]

Differences in genome, transcriptome, miRNAome, and methylome in synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer.

Despite distant metastases being the critical factor affecting patients' survival, they remain poorly understood. Our study thus aimed to molecularly characterize colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLMs) and explore whether molecular profiles differ between Synchronous (SmCRC) and Metachronous (MmCRC) colorectal cancer. This characterization was performed by whole exome sequencing, whole transcriptome, whole methylome, and miRNAome. The most frequent somatic mutations were in APC, SYNE1, TP53, and TTN genes. Among the differently methylated and expressed genes were those involved in cell adhesion, extracellular matrix organization and degradation, neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction. The top up-regulated microRNAs were hsa-miR-135b-3p and -5p, and the hsa-miR-200-family while the hsa-miR-548-family belonged to the top down-regulated. MmCRC patients evinced higher tumor mutational burden, a wider median of duplications and deletions, and a heterogeneous mutational signature than SmCRC. Regarding chronicity, a significant down-regulation of SMOC2 and PPP1R9A genes in SmCRC compared to MmCRC was observed. Two miRNAs were deregulated between SmCRC and MmCRC, hsa-miR-625-3p and has-miR-1269-3p. The combined data identified the IPO5 gene. Regardless of miRNA expression levels, the combined analysis resulted in 107 deregulated genes related to relaxin, estrogen, PI3K-Akt, WNT signaling pathways, and intracellular second messenger signaling. The intersection between our and validation sets confirmed the validity of our results. We have identified genes and pathways that may be considered as actionable targets in CRCLMs. Our data also provide a valuable resource for understanding molecular distinctions between SmCRC and MmCRC. They have the potential to enhance the diagnosis, prognostication, and management of CRCLMs by a molecularly targeted approach.

Metachronous Colorectal Cancer in Icelandic MSH6 and PMS2 Lynch Syndrome Carriers in 1955–2017: A Population-based Study

Metachronous Colorectal Cancer in Icelandic MSH6 and PMS2 Lynch Syndrome Carriers in 1955–2017: A Population-based Study