Meta-analysis Of Comparative Studies Research Articles

Stem Cell–Based Therapies via Different Administration Route for Stroke: A Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

Stroke, a neurological condition from compromised cerebral blood perfusion, remains a major global cause of mortality and disability. Conventional therapies like tissue plasminogen activator are limited by narrow therapeutic windows and potential adverse effects, highlighting the urgency for novel treatments. Stem cell–based therapies, with their neuroprotective and regenerative properties, present a promising yet highly diverse alternative. By conducting literature search and data extraction from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, this meta-analysis assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of stem cell–based therapies administered via intravenous (IV) and non-IV routes in 17 studies with stroke patients. Primary outcomes included the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel Index (BI), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS), while secondary outcomes included mortality and adverse events. Results demonstrated significant improvements in NIHSS, BI, and mRS scores, particularly in non-IV groups within 6- and 12-month follow-ups, suggesting delayed but enhanced therapeutic efficacy. Mortality was reduced in both IV and non-IV groups, indicating treatment safety. Adverse events, categorized into neurological and systemic complications, showed no significant differences between intervention and control groups, further emphasizing the safety of stem cell therapies. Non-IV routes showed more long-term benefits, potentially due to enhanced cell delivery and integration. These findings demonstrate the potential of stem cell therapies to improve functional recovery and survival in stroke patients, regardless of administration route. However, the delayed response underscores the need for extended follow-up in clinical applications. Further research is required to standardize treatment protocols, optimize cell types and doses, and address patient-specific factors to integrate stem cell therapies into routine clinical practice.

Prognosis after one- and two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Revision surgeries for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) in arthroplasty can follow either one- or two-stage treatment protocols. Previous studies have reported similar reinfection rates and reductions in complication rates for both treatment options. However, the literature on the selection of one protocol is still controversial. Thus, our aim was to compare the outcomes, including reinfections, complications, reoperations, and mortality, associated with one- and two-stage revision surgeries for PJI via a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Comparative studies were identified through searches in PubMed, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library as of November 2023. RevMan version 5.3 was used for the analyses. The included studies directly compared one-stage revisions with two-stage revisions for PJI. The primary outcomes included reinfection, complications, reoperation, and mortality. Sixteen cohort studies (fifteen retrospective and one prospective) were included in the systematic review. All studies comprising 2039 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Fourteen studies reported reinfection patient risk postrevision; when pooled via random effects models, 10.02% of patients in the one-stage group and 14.75% of patients in the two-stage group were reinfected, indicating low heterogeneity (risk ratio = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.50 - 0.94, I2 = 0%). A pooled analysis of ten studies reported complications between the two groups. Compared with the two-stage group, the one-stage group was associated with significantly fewer complications (risk ratio = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.63 - 0.91, I2 = 27%). The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in reoperation events between the 1st-stage and 2nd-stage groups in nine studies (risk ratio = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.59 - 1.01, I2 = 20%) or in mortality in ten studies (risk ratio = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.49 - 1.78, I2 = 0%). Among the available observational studies, the meta-analysis revealed a lower incidence of reinfection and complications in the one-stage group than in the two-stage group, but there were no significant differences in reoperation events or mortalities.

Short and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation from brain death vs. circulatory death donors: A meta-analysis of comparative studies.

To investigate through a meta-analysis of comparative studies the impact of donor type (brain death DBD vs circulatory death DCD) on the short- and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation(LTx). Literature search (terms "lung transplantation" AND "donation after circulatory death") was performed up to July 2022 and studies comparing outcomes of LTx from DCD versus DBD were selected. Primary endpoints were early and long-term mortality. Secondary outcomes included primary graft dysfunction (PGD),acute rejection and postoperative complications. The long-term survival was analyzed by retrieving data from each available Kaplan-Meier and restricted mean survival time difference between DBD and DCD for long-term survival was estimated. 21 studies were included comprising 60105 patients (DBD=58548 DCD=1557). Recipient and donor baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. No significant publication bias was observed. The estimated pooled odds ratio of early mortality favored DBD (OR=0.75,CI=0.56-1.00, I2=0%). No statistically significant difference was observed in the risk of acute rejection (OR=1.33, CI=0.82-2.17), and PGD grade 2-3 (OR=0.88, CI=0.69-1.13). One- and 5-year survival were 82.1% and 51.2%, and 86.2% and 62.7% for DBD and DCD groups, respectively (Log-rank,p<0.0001). Unadjusted hazard ratio was 0.693, with DCD as reference. DCD lungs demonstrated improved survival by 4.82% over 5-years when compared to DBD lungs. This meta-analysis of comparative studies between DCD and DBD demonstrates significant long-term survival advantage of DCD LTx despite an initial small but statistically significant increased mortality risk in the short-term. Data supports the continued implementation of DCD to increase the lung donor pool.

Survival after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute high-risk Pulmonary Embolism: A meta-analysis of comparative studies.

The survival benefit of venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) for the management of acute high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remains unclear. This meta-analysis combines data from comparative studies to assess the risk of mortality after ECMO vs standard care in the management of acute high-risk PE. Databases of PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from 01st January 2000 to 24th March 2023 for comparative studies with at least 10 patients/group comparing ECMO vs standard treatment. PRISMA guidelines were followed for this review. We extracted mortality data and combined it to obtain the outcome as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in a random-effects model. Ten studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that the risk of early mortality was not significantly different between ECMO and non-ECMO groups (RR: 0.97 95% CI: 0.78, 1.19 I2=73%). No change in significance was noted on subgroup analysis based on study location, sample size, cardiac arrest, systemic thrombolysis, and surgical embolectomy. Limited evidence derived from mostly retrospective studies riddled with selection bias suggests that ECMO may not offer additional survival benefits in high-risk PE.

Nail-plate combination constructs versus single traditional constructs for distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Distal femur fractures (DFF) are frequently treated surgically with single traditional constructs (STC), such as with a lateral plate or intramedullary nail, although nail-plate combination constructs (NPCC) are gaining attention. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between NPCC and STC for surgical fixation of DFF to guide surgeon decision-making. Data Sources: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, and SPORTDiscus from database inception until January 10th, 2024. Inclusion criteria were comparative studies that examined clinical outcomes and complications for NPCC versus STC for DFF in adult patients. Data included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), as well as likelihood of total complications, total unplanned reoperations, and malunion. Statistical analysis included a random-effects model using unstandardized mean difference or odds ratio (OR). Five retrospective comparative studies (n = 1,368 patients; mean age: 52.3 ± 8.1 years; 134 patients in the NPCC group) were included. There was no statistically significant difference in operative time (p = 0.696), EBL (p = 0.408), or LOS (p = 0.963) between patients in the NPCC group as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. Patients in the NPCC group had a statistically significant lower number of total complications (p = 0.009; OR: 0.31; 10.6% versus 16.0%) and total unplanned reoperations (p = 0.027; OR: 0.42; 8.2% versus 14.8%) as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of malunion cases between groups (p = 0.130), although the NPCC group had far fewer cases than the STC group (2.9% versus 10.5%). Patients treated with NPCC had significantly fewer cases of total complications and total unplanned reoperations without significant differences in operative time, EBL, or LOS as compared to patients treated with STC for DFF, although these associations are limited by sample size. Level IV.

Combined anterior-posterior versus posterior only approach for surgical management of adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the clinical outcomes and complication rates for fusion procedures of adult spinal deformity (ASD) performed via an anterior-posterior approach as compared to a posterior-only approach to guide surgical decision-making. Numerous surgical techniques exist for operative management of ASD; however, no systematic review and meta-analysis exists comparing combined anterior-posterior approaches to posterior-only approach, despite significant interest in the current literature. Four databases were used to collect articles from database inception until September 9th, 2023. Inclusion criteria was articles that examined both anterior-posterior or posterior only surgical approach, adult patients, comparative studies, and articles in English. Seven comparative articles met the inclusion criteria. Included patients had a frequency weighted (FW) mean age of 60.2 ± 5.1 years and a FW mean follow-up of 40.4 ± 12.5 months. Qualitative data did not favor either group in terms of length of stay, radiographic outcomes, or functional outcomes. There was a total of 306 complications in the Anterior-Posterior group with a complication rate per patient of 1.0 ± 0.9 complications whereas there was a total of 380 complications in the Posterior Only group with a complication rate per patient of 1.0 ± 1.2 complications. Meta-analysis of specific complications found no significant difference in revision rate, dural tear rate, neurological complication rate, infection rate, or pseudoarthrosis rate. Surgical management for ASD may provide comparable results in terms of surgical parameters, radiographic outcomes, functional outcomes, and complication rates, irrespective of surgical approach.

Safety and effectiveness of preoperative stenting compared to non-stenting in ureteroscopy for urinary stone disease: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Ureteroscopy (URS) is considered one of the first-line surgical treatments for urinary stones < 2cm. Preoperative stenting (PS) employment in URS for urolithiasis remains debated, with evidence differing in terms of outcomes and recommendations. We sought to evaluate the influence of PS on surgical outcomes compared to non-PS (NPS) in patients with renal and ureteral stones undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Databases were searched until December 2023 for randomized and non-randomized studies reporting perioperative outcomes for PS and NPS. Pooled data were analyzed through a Random-Effects model when Higgins I2% heterogeneity values were > 50%; otherwise, a Fixed-Effects model was employed. Results were reported as risk ratios (RR), or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The analysis included 23,668 patients from 25 included studies (5 non-randomized prospective and 20 retrospective studies). Higher stone-free rates (SFR) were observed in kidney and ureteral stones (RR 1.05; 95%CI 1.03-1.08; p ≤ 0.0001), especially if managed with flexible URS (RR 1.05; 95%CI 1.01-1.09) in the PS cohort. Additionally, lower rates of intraoperative (RR 0.70; 95%CI 0.49-0.99; p = 0.04) and postoperative complications (RR 0.82; 95%CI 0.70-0.95; p = 0.008) were seen with PS. Both groups had a comparable operative time, length of stay (LOS), ureteral access sheath (UAS) placement success, and SFR in semi-rigid URS. Higher SFR with PS were seen in kidney and ureteral stones, especially if f-URS was employed. Moreover, perioperative complications did not increase with PS. Future randomized studies, evaluating cost-effectiveness and quality of life are needed.

Surgical management versus non-surgical management for distal ulna fractures: A systemic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

Surgical management versus non-surgical management for distal ulna fractures: A systemic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

Midterm results after FEVAR and open surgery for infrarenal aortic aneurysms with short proximal necks: systematic review with meta-analysis of comparative studies.

This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to compare short and midterm outcomes between fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair and open surgery in repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with short necks. PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus electronic databases were searched for studies referring to fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) or open surgery (OSR) in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with neck length <15 mm. The primary endpoint of interest was early mortality. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), bowel ischemia, acute kidney injury (AKI), late mortality and secondary interventions. Overall, 21 studies were included, with a total of 3084 patients (1157 FEVAR and 1927 OSR). The pooled rate of early mortality following FEVAR was 2.7% (95% CI: 1.6, 4.0; I2=27.7%), compared with 3.7% (95% CI: 1.9, 6.0; I2=78.1%) after OSR. Comparative studies demonstrated no significant differences in 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.79; 95% CI: 0.37, 1.68). A decreased risk of postoperative MACE (OR=0.51; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.95) and bowel ischemia (OR=0.30; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.86) was observed in FEVAR patients although no significant differences were seen regarding AKI (OR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.23, 1.67). Late mortality (OR=1.68; 95% CI: 1.03, 2.74) and reintervention risk (OR=4.17; 95% CI: 2.05, 8.50) were both significantly higher in FEVAR group. FEVAR and OSR showed no statistically significant differences in postoperative mortality in the treatment of patients with AAA with short neck length, despite lower morbidity in the former. Oppositely, FEVAR present with greater mortality and reintervention risk in the midterm. Randomized controlled trials are needed to provide secure recommendations towards preferential use of either technique for juxtarenal AAA repair.

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Childhood Development and Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

From 2020 to 2023, the coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic exposed children to a variety of adverse childhood events, including parental loss, abuse, and disruption in services, and it exacerbated societal inequities. Studies evaluating the mental health of older children and adolescents reported increases in depression and anxiety symptoms, but no reviews have addressed the effects of the pandemic on preschool children. This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to explore these effects. The goal was to analyze and synthesize longitudinal cohort studies to determine impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the development and mental health of young children. Searches of multiple databases were performed for studies published between 2018 and 2023 with pre- and post-pandemic evaluations of the mental health or development of preschool children (aged 0–6 years) using objective measures and according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Cohen’s d effect sizes were calculated for each study that utilized the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ), or the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Random-effects mixed models combined the estimates of effect sizes to calculate the overall mean effect size. The meta-analyses included 22,348 children from 16 countries. The analyses showed small increases in emotional symptoms and conduct problems, as well as increases in emotional reactivity, anxiety/depression, withdrawal symptoms, attention problems, and aggressive behaviors. A decrease in fine motor and personal–social skills was noted. Studies not included in these meta-analyses also showed negative effects on language and executive function. This systematic review characterizes the detrimental effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and development of preschool children across the world. Our results suggest the vulnerability of early childhood to pandemic-related disruptions, although the heterogeneity in study design and child characteristics may limit some of these conclusions.

Association of suture augmentation with graft failure and clinical outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

To compare graft failure, nonrevision reoperation, complication, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and return to sports (RTS) between patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with and without suture augmentation (SA). A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science databases from the inception of databases to 18 April 2024, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies comparing clinical outcomes of SA- and standard ACLR with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Data extraction and quality appraisal were performed by two researchers independently. Eight retrospective cohort studies were included, with a total of 408 patients receiving SA-ACLR and 443 patients receiving standard ACLR. A meta-analysis of graft failure demonstrated a 62% relative risk reduction (RR [risk ratio], 0.38 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.19-0.73]; p = .004) in those receiving SA-ACLR compared with standard ACLR. An age-related heterogeneity in graft failure reduction was detected in the subgroup analysis, which was more pronounced in studies with mean ages of <20 years compared with ≥20 years (p = .05; I2 = 73.9%). No significant difference was observed in nonrevision reoperation or complication rates. No clinically relevant difference was observed in PROMs. SA-ACLR was associated with a significantly higher RTS rate compared with the standard ACLR (RR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.00-1.24]; p = .04), whereas no significant difference was observed in time to RTS. SA-ACLR is associated with a reduced graft failure rate and increased RTS rate compared with standard ACLR without additional reoperations or complications. However, confidence in the evidence is limited by substantial heterogeneity. Future studies with a higher level of evidence are warranted to validate the benefit of SA and to determine the indication for different risk populations. Level III.

Cervical Laminoplasty is Associated With Lower Health Care Costs as Compared With Cervical Fusion Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.

Systematic review and meta-analysis. The purpose of this study is to examine the cost of CLP versus CF stratified by approach to guide decision-making. Cervical laminoplasty (CLP) and cervical fusion (CF) are viable alternatives for surgical management of cervical spine myelopathy, with no clear consensus on clinical superiority. However, despite clinical equivalence in patient outcomes, there is limited data on the relative costs between CLP and CF. This study searched PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria were articles that examined the cost between CLP and any type of CF (stratified by anterior, posterior, or combined approach). A random-effects continuous model for meta-analysis was performed using standardized mean difference (SMD). Eleven articles were included. Patients (n = 21,033) had an average age of 56.0 ± 3.6 years and underwent either CLP (n = 4364), posterior CF (n = 3529), anterior CF (n = 13,084), or combined CF (n = 56). The mean reported cost among patients who underwent CLP (n=3742) was significantly lower compared with patients who underwent CF (n = 6329), irrespective of the approach for CF (P = 0.028; SMD = -2.965). For subgroup analysis by surgical approach, the mean reported cost among patients treated with CLP was significantly lower as compared with patients treated with posterior CF (P = 0.013; SMD = -1.861) and anterior CF (P < 0.001; SMD = -0.344). Patients who underwent CLP had a significantly lower mean hardware cost than patients who underwent posterior CF (P < 0.001; SMD = -3.275). CLP appears to be associated with statistically significant and clinically relevant lower reported costs than CF, irrespective of the approach based on meta-analysis of low or moderate-quality retrospective studies. CLP may also have lower reported costs than both posterior CF and anterior CF. IV.

Pre-Copulatory Sexual Selection Predicts Sexual Size Dimorphism: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Size differences between males and females are common across the tree of life (termed sexual size dimorphism; SSD), and have fundamental implications for ecology, life history and behaviour of both sexes. Conventionally, SSD is thought to evolve in response to sex-specific sexual selection but more recent work suggests that ecological processes can also promote sex-differences in size. Here, we provide a global test for the role of sexual selection in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism using data from 77 comparative studies spanning the major classes of the animal kingdom. We show that intense sexual selection typically correlates with male-biased SSD across species. Importantly, pre-copulatory but not post-copulatory sexual selection predicts SSD, suggesting a pervasive role of premating male-male competition and female choice to drive sex differences in body size. Collectively, our findings suggest that pre-copulatory sexual selection plays a major role in the evolution of male-biased SSD.

Central (Aortic) Cannulation versus Peripheral (Axillary or Femoral) Cannulation in Acute Type A Aortic Dissections: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

There has been an increased interest in using antegrade cannulation techniques during surgery for type A aortic dissection. While the utilization of central artery cannulation has been on the rise in recent times, its effectiveness and safety still require thorough examination. This study aimed to explore both the efficiency and safety of central arterial cannulation. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies that evaluated surgical outcomes when using central artery cannulation (CAC) in comparison to axillary artery cannulation (AXC) or femoral artery cannulation (FAC). 10 retrospective observational studies were included, enrolling 3022 patients (CAC = 1208 vs. FAC = 606; CAC = 1051 vs. AXC = 1119). Among these, 4 articles involved axillary artery cannulation, femoral artery cannulation, and central artery cannulation. Central cannulation was linked to decreased short-term mortality [odds ratio, 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.48, 0.89), 2 = 3.27, p = 0.007; = 0; p = 0.86] compared to femoral cannulation. Additionally, central cannulation was associated with a lower occurrence of temporary neurological dysfunction (TND) [odds ratio, 0.57, 95% CI (0.38, 0.85), 2 = 0.88, p = 0.006; = 0%, p = 0.83] when compared with femoral cannulation. However, there was no statistical significance in mortality and TND between the central cannulation and axillary cannulation groups. This meta-analysis reveals that central cannulation surpasses femoral cannulation in lowering short-term mortality and the occurrence of TND among patients undergoing surgery for type A acute aortic dissection. However, central cannulation does not exhibit a higher mortality and TND compared to axillary cannulation.

Is reduction necessary in overriding metaphyseal distal radius fractures in children under 11years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

To determine the necessity of reduction in the treatment of overriding metaphyseal distal radius fractures (DRF) in children under 11years. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to retrieve studies published from inception to 2023. Two reviewers independently screened for studies with observational or randomized control design comparing two treatments for overriding metaphyseal DRF in patients under 11years: simple casting without reduction (SC group) versus closed reduction plus casting or pin fixation (CRC/F group); with varying outcomes reported (CRD471761). The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Out of 3,024 screened studies, three met the inclusion criteria, 180 children (mean age 7.1 ± 0.9years) with overriding metaphyseal DRF: SC-group (n = 79) versus CRC/F-group (n = 101). Both treatment groups achieved 100% fracture consolidation without requiring further manipulation. The SC-group showed significantly fewer complications (mean difference [MD] 0.08; 95% CI [0.01, 0.53]; I2 = 22%;P < 0.009) and trends towards better sagittal alignment (MD 5.11; 95% CI [11.92, 1.71]; I2 = 94%; P < 0.14), less reinterventions (MD 0.31; 95% CI [0.01, 8.31]; P < 0.48), and fewer patients with motion limitation at the end of follow-up (MD 0.23; 95% CI [0.03, 1.98]; P < 0.18), although these findings were not statistically significant. Despite a limited number of studies comparing SC versus CRC/F in overriding DRF in children under 11years, this study suggests that anatomical reduction is not necessary. Treating these fractures with SC, even when presenting with an overriding position, leads to reduced complications, shows a trend towards fewer reinterventions, improved sagittal alignment, and less limitation in patient motion. Level III, Systematic review of Level-III studies.

Prostate cancer detection and complications of MRI-targeted prostate biopsy using cognitive registration, software-assisted image fusion or in-bore guidance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Three primary strategies for MRI-targeted biopsies (TB) are available: Cognitive TB (COG-TB), MRI-US Fusion TB (FUS-TB), and In Bore TB (IB-TB). Despite nearly a decade of practice, a consensus on the preferred approach is lacking, with previous studies showing comparable PCa detection rates among the three methods. We conducted a search of PubMed, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from 2014 to 2023, to identify studies comparing at least two of the three methods and reporting clinically significant PCa (csPCa) detection rates. The primary and secondary outcomes were to compare the csPCa and insignificant prostate cancer (iPCa, ISUP GG 1) detection rates between TB techniques. The tertiary outcome was to compare the complication rate between TB techniques. Detection rates were pooled using random-effect models. Planned sensitivity analyses included subgroup analysis according to the definition of csPCa and positive MRI, previous biopsy status, biopsy route, prostate volume, and lesion characteristics. A total of twenty studies, involving 4928 patients, were included in the quantitative synthesis. The meta-analysis unveiled comparable csPCa detection rates among COG-TB (0.37), FUS-TB (0.39), and IB-TB (0.47). iPCa detection rate was also similar between TB techniques (COG-TB: 0.12, FUS-TB: 0.17, IB-TB: 0.18). All preplanned sensitivity analyses were conducted and did not show any statistically significant difference in the detection of csPCa between TB methods. Complication rates, however, were infrequently reported, and when available, no statistically significant differences were observed among the techniques. This unique study, exclusively focusing on comparative research, indicates no significant differences in csPCa and iPCa detection rates between COG-TB, FUS-TB, and IB-TB. Decisions between these techniques may extend beyond diagnostic accuracy, considering factors such as resource availability and operator preferences. Well-designed prospective studies are warranted to refine our understanding of the optimal approach for TB in diverse clinical scenarios.

Elevated levels of loneliness in migrant children compared to nonmigrant children in urban China: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

About one in four children in China is a migrant child. This population has a higher risk of experiencing loneliness. However, existing studies present conflicting findings regarding the levels of loneliness among migrant children as compared to local urban children in urban China. This review performs a meta-analysis of studies comparing loneliness levels between these two groups. A literature search of major Chinese- and English-language databases revealed 27 eligible comparative studies. These studies reported the means and standardized deviations of loneliness scores for both migrant and nonmigrant children in urban China. Meta-analysis results showed that migrant children experienced significantly higher levels of loneliness than their urban nonmigrant counterparts [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.21, P < 0.001]. Subgroup analysis revealed that studies enrolling migrant children from migrant children's schools had significantly higher pooled SMDs than those enrolling children from public schools (0.346 vs. 0.120, P = 0.047). Migrant children in urban China experience higher levels of loneliness compared to their local urban peers. Efforts to create a socially inclusive, migrant-friendly environment and reduce social isolation among migrant children are crucial to help alleviate their feelings of loneliness.

Single port robot-assisted radical and simple prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim of our study was to review the current evidence on single port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) and SP robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (SP-RASP) procedures. A comprehensive bibliographic search on multiple databases was conducted in July 2023. Studies were included if they assessed patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer or candidate for benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery (P) who underwent SP-RARP or SP-RASP, respectively, (I), compared or not with other surgical techniques (C), evaluating perioperative, oncological, or functional outcomes (O). Prospective and retrospective original articles were included (S). A meta-analysis of comparative studies between SP-RARP and MP-RARP was performed. A total of 21 studies investigating 1400 patients were included in our systematic review, 18 were related to SP-RARP while 3 to SP-RASP. Only 8 comparative studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Mean follow-up was 8.1 (±5.8) months. Similar outcomes were observed for SP-RARP and MP-RARP in terms of operative time, catheterization time, pain score, complications rate, continence and potency rates, positive surgical margin, and biochemical recurrence. Length of hospital stay was shorter in the SP group after sensitivity analysis (WMD -0.58, 95% IC -1.17 to -0.9, p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis by extraperitoneal approach did not show any statistical difference, except for a lower positive margins rate in the SP extraperitoneal technique compared to MP-RARP. Overall, SP-RASP exhibited shorter hospital stay and lower rate of de novo urinary incontinence when compared to other techniques, while no differences were reported in terms of postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score, post void residual and maximum flow. Overall comparable oncological, functional, and perioperative outcomes can be achieved with SP platform. Subgroup analysis by different approaches did not reveal significant variations in outcomes. However, the retrospective nature of the studies, the limited follow-up, and the relatively small sample size of selected Centers may impact these results.

Ponte Osteotomies in the Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

The purpose of the present paper is to assess if Ponte osteotomies (POs) allow for a better correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery and to investigate their safety profile. A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted. Inclusion criteria: comparative studies that reported the outcomes of AIS patients who underwent surgical correction through posterior-only approach with and without POs. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were extracted and summarized. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate the differences between patients treated with and without POs. p < 0.05 was considered significant. In total, 9 studies were included. No significant difference in thoracic kyphosis (TK) change between patients treated with and without POs was found (+3.8°; p = 0.06). Considering only hypokyphotic patients, a significant difference in TK change resulted in POs patients (+6.6°; p < 0.01), while a non-significant TK change resulted in normokyphotic patients (+0.2°; p = 0.96). No significant difference in coronal correction (2.5°; p = 0.10) was recorded. Significant estimated blood loss (EBL) (142.5 mL; p = 0.04) and surgical time (21.5 min; p = 0.04) differences were found with POs. Regarding complications rate, the meta-analysis showed a non-significant log odds ratio of 1.1 (p = 0.08) with POs. In conclusion, POs allow for the restoration of TK in hypokyphotic AIS, without a significantly greater TK change in normokyphotic patients, nor a significantly better coronal correction. Considering the significantly greater EBL and the trend toward a higher complications rate, the correct indication for POs is crucial.

Antibiotic-Coated Intramedullary Nailing Managing Long Bone Infected Non-Unions: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Long bone infected non-unions are such an orthopedic challenge that antibiotic-coated intramedullary nailing (ACIN) has become a viable therapeutic option for their management. This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the available data about the use of antibiotic-coated nailing in the treatment of long bone infected non-unions. Following the PRISMA guideline in this meta-analysis, a systematic literature search was conducted across major databases for studies evaluating ACIN in long bone infected non-unions. The primary outcome measures included union rates, infection control, complications and functional status. Five eligible studies encompassing 183 patients in total met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed no difference in the union rate in the antibiotic-coated intramedullary nailing group compared to that of the control group (OR = 1.73 [0.75-4.02]). Antibiotic-coated intramedullary nailing demonstrated no association with higher infection eradication (OR = 2.10 [0.97-4.54]). Also, functional outcome measure was mostly not significantly different between ACIN and control interventions. According to this meta-analysis, compared to the management of controls, ACIN is neither linked to increased union rates nor decreased infection rates. The paucity of research on this topic emphasizes the continuous need for additional well-designed randomized controlled trials for the application of antibiotics-coated intramedullary nailing in long bone non-unions.