AbstractAccurately representing mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) is crucial to simulating the energy and water cycles in global climate models. Using a novel MCS identification and tracking algorithm applied to observations and model simulations, we evaluate how well the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) simulates MCSs over the central US. Simulations performed by E3SM at 25 km grid spacing with and without superparameterization (SP) are compared and evaluated against observations using multiple metrics highlighting important MCS characteristics. Compared to E3SM, the superparameterized model (SP‐E3SM) better simulates MCS number and MCS precipitation amount, diurnal cycle, propagation, and the probability distribution of precipitation rate in both spring and summer. The improvement from SP is partly contributed by improvement in simulating the large‐scale environments, featuring enhanced atmospheric low‐level moisture and larger moisture transport to the central US relative to E3SM. However, SP‐E3SM still underestimates MCS precipitation amount, particularly in summer. This underestimation is closely related to the negative bias in MCS precipitation intensity, although the drier environments simulated during summer also contributes to underestimation of MCS frequency. Without SP, the larger bias in MCS precipitation amount is closely related to the negative bias in MCS frequency, while the substantial dry bias in the large‐scale environments also contributes to underestimation of MCS intensity. Our results suggest that SP improves MCS simulation by improving modeling of the large‐scale environments and convection initiation, which are both major limiting factors in E3SM even at 25 km grid spacing where deep convection is represented by a cumulus parameterization.
Read full abstract