Mesh Repair Of Inguinal Hernia Research Articles

Inguinal hernia repair with or without mesh in late adolescent males

PurposeInguinal hernia repair is one of the most common treatments worldwide, but there are few studies about the use of mesh in late adolescent patients because hernias are rare in this group. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of hernia repair with and without mesh in late adolescent patients.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 243 male patients aged between 18 and 21 years who underwent inguinal hernia repair at a single institution from January 2013 to December 2017. We distinguished 2 groups depending on the repair method; mesh (n = 121) and no-mesh (n = 122) groups. We compared the baseline characteristics, immediate postoperative outcomes, and recurrence and chronic pain rates between the 2 groups.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the mesh and no-mesh groups on immediate postoperative outcomes (length of stay: 18.5 ± 8.9 days vs. 17.0 ± 6.0 days, P = 0.139; postoperative complications: 8.2% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.821) and 2-year recurrence rate (0.8% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.194). There was a significant difference in the chronic pain rate (9.0% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.023).ConclusionUsing mesh for inguinal hernia repair in late adolescent male patients increases chronic postoperative inguinal pain.

COMPARATIVE CLINICAL STUDY OF NON-MESH VERSUS MESH REPAIR IN PRIMARY INGUINAL HERNIA

Background: The inguinal regions are one of the natural weak areas in the abdominal wall and are the most common site of herniation. Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed operations. Amis: The aim of this study is to compare open mesh and non-mesh suture repair of primary inguinal hernias with respect to clinical outcome which include postoperative pain, complications, time of return to work and recurrence. Matierial and methods: This prospective study of 102 cases of primary inguinal hernia repair was carried out at M.G.M. Medical College & L.S.K. Hospital, Kishanganj with the aim of comparing open mesh and non-mesh suture repair with respect to clinical outcome which included postoperative pain, complications time of return to work and recurrence. Result: In our study there were no specific criteria for allocation of the method of repair and of 102 patients 52 patients randomly underwent non-mesh repair and 50 patients underwent mesh repair. Conclusion: The use of prosthetic mesh allows tension-free repair of inguinal hernia and in theory better results. Our study proves the superiority of this method over non-mesh repair in the long term with regard to hernia recurrence; in addition, there were less complications and postoperative pain.

Dermatome Mapping Test in the analysis of anatomo-clinical correlations after inguinal hernia repair

BackgroundNerve identification is recommended in inguinal hernia repair to reduce or avoid postoperative pain. The aim of this prospective observational study was to identify nerve prevalence and find a correlation between neuroanatomy and chronic neuropathic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) after 6 months.MaterialA total of 115 patients, who underwent inguinal hernia mesh repair (Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair) between July 2018 and January 2019, were included in this prospective observational study. The mean age and BMI respectively resulted 64 years and 25.8 with minimal inverse distribution of BMI with respect to age. Most of the hernias were direct (59.1%) and of medium dimension (47.8%). Furthermore, these patients were undergoing Dermatome Mapping Test in preoperatively and postoperatively 6 months evaluation.ResultsIdentification rates of the iliohypogastric (IH), ilioinguinal (II) and genitofemoral (GF) nerves were 72.2%, 82.6% and 48.7% respectively. In the analysis of nerve prevalence according to BMI, the IH was statistically significant higher in patients with BMI < 25 than BMI ≥ 25 P (< 0.05). After inguinal hernia mesh repair, 8 patients (6.9%) had chronic postoperative neuropathic inguinal pain after 6 months. The CPIP prevailed at II/GF dermatome. The relation between the identification/neurectomy of the II nerve and chronic postoperative inguinal pain after 6 months was not significant (P = 0.542).ConclusionThe anatomy of inguinal nerve is very heterogeneous and for this reason an accurate knowledge of these variations is needed during the open mesh repair of inguinal hernias. The new results of our analysis is the statistically significant higher IH nerve prevalence in patients with BMI < 25; probably the identification of inguinal nerve is more complex in obese patients. In the chronic postoperative inguinal pain, the II nerve may have a predominant role in determining postoperative long-term symptoms. Dermatome Mapping Test in an easy and safe method for preoperative and postoperative 6 months evaluation of groin pain. The most important evidence of our analysis is that the prevalence of chronic pain is higher when the nerves were not identified.

Inguinal hernias in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: is tension-free mesh repair feasible?

BackgroundContinuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), which often causes a common complication such as abdominal wall hernia, is a prevalent alternative therapy for end-stage renal failure patients. However, relevant studies are somewhat rare, and the peritoneal dialysis (PD) protocol during the perioperative period is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and perioperative management of tension-free mesh repair for inguinal hernias in CAPD patients.MethodsBetween January 2013 and December 2019, 18 CAPD patients with 20 inguinal hernias who underwent tension-free mesh repair were retrospectively analyzed. Data on demographics, perioperative features, the perioperative dialysis protocol and surgical complications were collected and assessed.ResultsAll hernias were diagnosed after the start of CAPD, and the median duration from PD onset to hernia formation was 16 months (2–61 months). All patients underwent successful tension-free mesh repair, including 17 Lichtenstein and 3 anterior Kugel procedures. The median operation time was 62.5 min, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days. Fifteen patients received low-exchange volumes and high-frequency exchanges from 1 to 3 days after surgery for 2 weeks with gradual resumption of the original CAPD regimen within 4 weeks. Complications included seroma (n = 2) and hematoma (n = 1). No wound or mesh infection or recurrence occurred during the follow-up period.ConclusionsTension-free mesh repair is safe and feasible for inguinal hernias in CAPD patients, The Lichtenstein mesh repair should be the first choice, and anterior Kugel repair may be considered an effective procedure. Bridging hemodialysis seems unnecessary except for emergency surgery.

National survey of inguinal hernia mesh repair practices.

Appendix S1. Inguinal hernia mesh repair. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fast Track Surgery in laparoscopic treatment of inguinal hernias

Background. Minimally invasive surgical techniques for inguinal hernia repair reduce the body’s overall stress response to surgical tissue damage, the risk of complications, the percentage of postoperative acute and chronic pain, recovery time.&#x0D; Objective. To improve short-term (acute inguinal pain in the early postoperative period) and long-term (chronic inguinal pain in the long-term follow-up) results of surgical treatment of patients with acquired inguinal hernia by using the modified (sutureless, without mesh fixation) laparoscopic technique of transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP) with application of Fast Track Surgery guidelines.&#x0D; Materials and methods. The retrospective clinical study included 124 patients aged 18 to 88 years (mean age – 46±2.1) with primary unilateral inguinal hernias who were operated on the clinical bases of the Department of Surgery and Vascular Surgery of Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education. The observation period was 3 years. Modified TAPP was performed in 78 patients (spinal anesthesia, local anesthesia of trocar wounds, terminal peritoneal anesthesia, preperitoneal infiltration of affected inguinal region dissection by local anesthetics, using of anatomical 3D mesh, sutureless restoration of peritoneal defect by electric welding method) and Lichtenstein technique was performed in 46 patients. The peritoneal defect in the main group after implant placement was restored by spot welding.&#x0D; There was experimental study before proceeding the clinical study. The experimental section of the work included 12 rabbits weighing 1.95-3.75 kg (average weight – 2.30±0.52). Each animal was cut peritoneum in three places on both sides of laparotomy with next reconstruction of the defect on one side by welding, and on the other – by suturing with synthetic suture material.&#x0D; Results and discussion. In biological samples from experimental animals, there was decreasing of number of live mesotheliocytes which did not increase the severity of the inflammatory reaction (p˂0.001). A statistically significant difference was observed in the welded scars with higher intensity of collagen formation than in the ligature scars, which provided greater strength of the tissue connection.&#x0D; There was a reduction in the patient’s length of stay in the hospital in 4.2 times in the group of modified technique. There was a reduction in the period before the ability to perform professional duties in 3.4 times in the group of new surgical method. There was no significant difference in the levels of postoperative complications (p=0.036) and re-operations due to complications (p=0.023). In the group of modified surgical treatment there were significant lower rates in the indicators of pain at rest (p&lt;0.001), pain during exercise (p&lt;0.001), recurrence rates (p&lt;0.001). There was a decrease in the need for analgetics in the main group in the early postoperative period (p˂0.001) and a reduction in the risk of prolonged inguinodynia (p˂0.001).&#x0D; Conclusions. The obtained results demonstrate the effectiveness of the use of modified laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia mesh repair for primary unilateral inguinal hernias with using Fast Track Surgery protocols with regard improving quality of life of patients in the early and long postoperative period and reduction of the risk of recurrence.

Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of bilateral primary inguinal hernia: A three-armed Randomized controlled trial

PurposeThe best approach for simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernia is controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes after laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of bilateral primary inguinal hernia. Methodsthis prospective study included 180 patients with bilateral primary inguinal hernia; randomized by sealed envelopes into 3 groups; each includes 60 patients. Group I treated by laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) repair using 2 separate meshes, Group II treated by open pre-peritoneal (PP) single mesh repair, while Group III treated by bilateral Lichtenstein repair. ResultsIn comparison to open PP and bilateral Lichtenstein repair, Laparoscopic TAPP repair had significantly longer operative time and superior early postoperative outcomes including significantly less postoperative pain, hospital stay, time till return to normal activity and to work. Chronic groin pain and mesh sensation was lower in Laparoscopic TAPP group with significantly higher satisfaction rate compared to open groups. No significant difference between study groups in 3 years recurrence rate. ConclusionSimultaneous laparoscopic TAPP repair of uncomplicated primary bilateral inguinal hernia has superior early postoperative outcome, less chronic pain and higher patients' satisfaction rate compared to open approaches with similar low recurrence rate.

Comparison between the composite heavy weight prolene mesh versus the prolene soft mesh for the reduction in post-operative pain in patients undergoing lichensteins mesh repair for inguinal hernias

Background: Globally, inguinal hernia is the most common type of hernia, comprising of approximately 75% of all abdominal wall hernias.Aim of the study was to compare the heavyweight composite polypropylene mesh versus the prolene soft mesh for the reduction of post-operative pain in patients undergoing lichensteins mesh repair for inguinal hernia.Methods: This study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, KLES Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Belgaum attached to KLE University’s J.N.M.C Belgaum.Results: Male preponderance was seen with 96.67% of patients in group SP and all (100%) patients in group RP were males. The mean age in group SP was 51.93±18.73 years compared to 49.50±14.03 years in group RP (p=0.571). The mean duration of the disease was 12.67±9.85 months in group SP whereas in group RP it was 15.10±8.98 months (p=0.321). The mean pulse rate in group SP and RP (79.60±5.64 vs 82.37±5.46 /min; p=0.059), systolic blood pressure (120.33±9.99 vs 124.33±11.94 mmHg; p=0.165) and diastolic blood pressure (73.73±6.76 vs 75.80±8.59 mmHg; p=0.305) were comparable. Right position was noted in 56.67% of patients in group SP compared to 50% of patients in group RP (p=0.673).Conclusions: Prolene soft mesh (lightweight macro-porous polypropylene mesh) significantly reduced the post-operative pain in patients undergoing lichensteins mesh repair for inguinal hernia as compared to heavyweight composite polypropylene mesh.

A study of incidence of inguinodynia in inguinal hernias repair at a tertiary center

Background: Chronic groin pain (inguinodynia) following inguinal hernia repair is a significant, though under-reported problem. Mild pain lasting for a few days is common following mesh inguinal hernia repair. However, moderate to severe pain persisting more than 3 months after inguinal herniorrhaphy should be considered as pathological. The main aim of this study was to assess the incidence of inguinodynia in inguinal hernia repair patients at a tertiary centre.Methods: This non-randomized retrospective study was undertaken in the department of general surgery, SMIMER Hospital, Surat, Gujarat, India from August 2016 to July 2019. Total 940 patients were operated for inguinal hernia repair during this period. Out of these 940 patients, only 460 patients could be traced for clinical evaluation as Surat is an industrial city with very high percentage of migrant population and so only, they were included in the study.Results: In this study, total 460 patients were included, in which 310 patients were operated for open inguinal hernia repair and 150 patients were operated for laparoscopic hernia repair. Total 102 (22.17%) patients has developed inguinodynia out of 460 patients evaluated in this series. Incidence of inguinodynia is more in open inguinal hernia repair than laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair i.e., 24.83% versus 16.67%. Incidence of testicular complication in inguinodynia patients is more in open inguinal hernia repair and non in laparoscopic repair.Conclusions: Authors conclude that overall incidence of inguinodynia is 22.17% and incidence of inguinodynia is higher in open hernia repair in comparison to laparoscopic hernia repair (24.83% versus 16.67%). The incidence of mild inguinodynia is approximately eight times more common than severe inguinodynia.

Operative outcome of hernia repair with synthetic mesh in immunocompromised patients.

The safety of synthetic mesh in elective hernia repair in the setting of immunosuppression lacks national and international consensus. The aim of our analysis was to explore the effects of immunosuppression on the rates of wound complications. Comparative analysis of immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients with elective mesh repair of inguinal, femoral, primary ventral, incisional or parastomal hernia between January 2001 and December 2013. Immunosuppression included glucocorticoids, biologicals, chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. Primary outcome parameter was mesh infection rate. Follow-up questionnaires were completed in written form or by telephone interview. Questionnaire response rate was 59.5% (n = 194) with a median follow-up of 33 (interquartile range: 28-41) months. There were no differences between immunocompromised (n = 40, 20.6%) and immunocompetent patients (n = 154, 79.4%) based on hernia and patient characteristics. Immunosuppression was not associated with the rates of mesh infection (P = 1.000), surgical site infection (SSI, P = 0.330) or re-operation for SSI (P = 0.365), but with higher rates (P = 0.007) and larger odds for hernia recurrence (odds ratio 3.264, 95% confidence interval 1.304-8.172; P = 0.012). Mesh infection also increased the odds for hernia recurrence (odds ratio 11.625; 95% confidence interval 1.754-77.057; P = 0.011). Only in the subset of ventral/incisional hernias, immunocompromised (n = 8, 40%) patients had higher recurrence rates than immunocompetent patients (n = 5, 11.6%; P = 0.017). Patients with SSI reported more frequently moderate to severe dysesthesia at the surgical site (P = 0.013) and would less frequently re-consent to surgery (P = 0.006). Immunosuppression does not increase the rate of wound infections after elective hernia repair with synthetic mesh. However, immunosuppression and mesh infection are risk factors for hernia recurrence.

Does primary closure of direct inguinal hernia defect during laparoscopic mesh repair reduce the risk of early recurrence?

Hernia recurrence is an important complication following inguinal hernia repair. Primary closure of ventral hernia defects laparoscopically has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrence and seroma formation. The results for ventral hernias may potentially be applied to direct inguinal hernias. Our aim was to evaluate the value of primary closure of direct defects during laparoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair in reducing the incidence of early recurrence. A retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted on cases performed from August 2016 to February 2018. Patients with direct inguinal hernias undergoing elective laparoscopic mesh repair were included. When performed, the direct hernia defect was primarily closed with extracorporeal non-absorbable interrupted sutures followed by standard placement of a lightweight mesh covering myopectineal orifices. Early recurrence was defined as occurring within 1year of surgery. A total of 75 direct inguinal hernias in 53 patients who underwent surgery and completed at least 1year of follow-up were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 63years (range 44-82years); with majority of patients being male (98.1%). There were no significant differences observed between the two patient populations in terms of demographics, mean operative time and risk factors. In 9 (16.9%) patients, the direct hernias were recurrent hernias and all underwent open mesh repair during the index hernia surgery. The majority of hernia repairs (63 hernias in 45 patients, 85%) were performed via the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach. 19 patients (35.8%) with 28 direct inguinal hernias underwent primary closure of the direct defect prior to mesh placement; while, 34 patients (64.2%) with 47 direct hernias did not undergo primary closure. There were 3 direct hernia recurrences (6.4%) at 1year post-operatively, and all occurred in the non-closure group. In comparison, there were no recurrences in the closure group; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.289) in our study due to the small sample size. Closure of direct inguinal hernia defects during laparoscopic mesh repair has been shown to reduce the incidence of early hernia recurrence in our retrospective study but future randomized controlled trials with large numbers would enable us to draw more robust conclusions and perhaps change the way we perform laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Patient-reported chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair with lightweight or heavyweight mesh: a prospective, patient-reported outcomes study.

Chronic pain after groin hernia repair is a significant problem, and it is unclear whether or not lightweight meshes help. This national register-based study investigated whether patients who underwent open anterior mesh inguinal hernia repair with lightweight mesh had less chronic pain than those who had hernia repair with heavyweight mesh. All patients registered in the Swedish Hernia Register between September 2012 and October 2016 were asked to complete a questionnaire assessing patient-reported outcome measures 1 year after surgery. The present study examined open anterior repair with mesh sutured in place with non-absorbable sutures in male patients only. The primary endpoint, chronic pain, was defined as pain present in the past week that could not be ignored and interfered with concentration (on chores) and daily activities. In total, 23 259 male patients provided data for analysis (response rate 70·6 per cent). Rates of chronic pain after repairs using regular polypropylene lightweight mesh, composite (poliglecaprone-25) polypropylene lightweight mesh and polypropylene heavyweight mesh were 15·8, 15·6 and 16·2 per cent respectively. Adjusted multiple logistic regression analysis showed no significant differences between regular (odds ratio (OR) 0·98, 95 per cent c.i. 0·90 to 1·06) or composite (OR 0·95, 0·86 to 1·04) lightweight mesh versus heavyweight mesh. The most striking risk factor for chronic pain was young age; 19·4 per cent of patients aged less than 50 years experienced pain 1 year after hernia repair (OR 1·43, 1·29 to 1·60). Patient-reported chronic pain 1 year after open mesh repair of inguinal hernia was common, particularly in young men. The risk of developing chronic pain was not influenced by the type of mesh.

Ilioinguinal Neurectomy and Chronic Post-Operative Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair

Ilioinguinal Neurectomy and Chronic Post-Operative Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair

Influence of previous laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair on performing radical prostatectomy: a nationwide survey among urological surgeons.

There is considerable demographic overlap of inguinal hernia patients and prostate cancer patients. Previous laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repairs can complicate subsequent radical prostatectomies due to adhesions and distortion of anatomic planes. This study aims to assess the experience of urological surgeons on the safety and feasibility of performing radical prostatectomies after laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair. For this cross-sectional study, an online 24 question survey was developed regarding the experience in performing a radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) with a prior preperitoneal inguinal hernia mesh repair. Between June 2016 and December 2017, the questionnaire was sent to all 68 urological surgeons performing radical prostatectomy in the Netherlands. The response rate of urological surgeons was 69% (n = 47). The majority (77%) of urological surgeons perform robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies. A previous preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair was reported by 40% of urological surgeons in 10-30% of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Radical prostatectomy with prior preperitoneal inguinal hernia mesh repair is considered more difficult by 49%, predominantly because of (occasionally to always) experienced longer operating times (88.4%), increased blood loss (46.5%), difficult dissection of Retzius space (88.4%), nerve-sparing difficulties (32.6%), less adequate PLND (69.8%), and bladder- (16.3%) or peritoneal perforations (27.9%). Additionally, 11.6% had performed mesh explantation, 16.3% had aborted radical prostatectomies, and 35.7% experienced increased inguinal hernia recurrences after radical prostatectomies with prior preperitoneal inguinal hernia mesh repair. More experienced urological surgeons reported an increased difficulty for all outcomes. Laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair has a significant impact on performing a radical prostatectomy and PLND. Surgeons should postpone the inguinal hernia repair of patients in the workup for a radical prostatectomy, with the preferable option of performing the radical prostatectomy and inguinal hernia repair in the same procedure. Alternatively, a Lichtenstein repair can be performed.

Use of Mosquito Net Mesh Versus Polypropylene Mesh in Tension-Free Repair of Inguinal Hernia: a 1-Year Randomized Controlled Trial

Commercially available polypropylene mesh is preferred in the developed countries during inguinal hernioplasty. Whereas, the mosquito net mesh is a safe and effective alternative in the developing countries such as India. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of mosquito net mesh as prosthesis in comparison with polypropylene mesh in inguinal hernia repair by Lichtenstein tension-free technique. A total of 60 patients presented with uncomplicated inguinal hernia were randomized into two groups: group A (mosquito net mesh) and group B (polypropylene mesh). Postoperatively, the Southampton scoring system was employed to assess the level of infection at the surgical site on days 3, 5, 7, and 10. The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS 20.0. The data were compared using Fisher’s exact test, chi-square test, and independent sample t test. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All the patients were men and majority were in the age-group of 51–60 years. Right-sided inguinal hernia was reported in most (30) of the patients. The rate of surgical site infection on postoperative day 3 (P = 1.000), 5 (P = 0.704), 7 (P = 0.612), and 10 (P = 1.000) were comparable in both groups A and B. The baseline characteristics, clinical presentations, and assessment of surgical site infection in both groups were comparable. Therefore, mosquito net mesh, as prosthesis for inguinal hernia repair, is equally safe and efficacious as polypropylene mesh.

Surgical Procedures and Results of Modified Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair for Inguinal Hernia After Radical Prostatectomy.

Background: Although inguinal hernia occurs frequently after radical prostatectomy, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair occasionally poses challenges due to fibrosis of the preperitoneal cavity. In patients with severe intrapelvic fibrosis, we have adopted a modified intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) technique. The surgical factors were compared between patients who underwent modified IPOM and those who underwent TAPP for inguinal hernia repair. Materials and Methods: In total, 57 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernias after radical prostatectomy between February 2013 and January 2020. TAPP was successfully completed in 44 patients, whereas 13 patients underwent modified IPOM converted from TAPP. The surgical results were retrospectively compared. Results: The median follow-up duration was 36.0 months (range, 1-84 months). Intraoperative complications, recurrence of hernia, and chronic pain were not observed in both groups. The average duration of surgery in the modified IPOM group was longer than that in the TAPP group (137 versus 107 minutes, P < .05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of the inguinal-related complications such as inguinal pain or inguinal swelling. Conclusions: Postoperative complications including recurrence of hernia after modified IPOM are comparable to those after TAPP hernia repair. Modified IPOM repair is a surgical option for repairing inguinal hernias following radical prostatectomy.

Evaluation of efficacy of self-gripping mesh in open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

1.1 Background: Inguinal hernioplasty is one of the most common surgeries perfomed. With the extensive use of prosthetic mesh implants in open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, recurrence rates have decreased substantially. Therefore, the focus has been shifted from the clinical outcomes, such as recurrence, towards patient-experienced endpoints, such as chronic pain. Use of self adhesive mesh eliminates the complication risk, increased operation time, and expense that come with the mechanical fixation of mesh. Hence this study, to prove the efficacy of self-gripping mesh in open and laparoscopic hernia repair in terms of post-op complications, recurrence rate and cost effectiveness. 1.2 Methods: A study was conducted between June 2017 and April 2019. Patients aged between 18 to 60 years with primary inguinal hernia were operated either open or laparoscopically using self-gripping mesh. The patients were followed up for 6 months to look for post-operative complications and recurrence. 1.3 Results: In total, 60 patients, 30 in open group and 30 in laparoscopic group underwent operation. Postoperative pain was low in both groups in comparison to previous studies on use of simple polypropylene mesh fixed with suture or tacker. Self-gripping mesh was found to be more cost effective as compared to polypropylene mesh with added cost of suture or tacker. 1.4 Conclusions: In conclusion use of self-gripping mesh in inguinal hernia repair either in open or laparoscopic method is more efficacious than simple polypropylene mesh.

Outcome of tension free open mesh repair of inguinal hernia

Background: In the practice of General Surgery, hernia repair is the second most common procedure after appendectomy. Several methods have been developed over the years to try to improve hernia repair. Good result can be expected using Bassini's, McVay's, Shouldice's techniques provided the exact nature of hernia is recognized and the repair is done without tension using healthy tissue. The introduction of synthetic mesh started a new era in hernia surgery. The use of synthetic mesh repair of primary and recurrent hernias has gradually gained acceptance among surgeons.&#x0D; Objective: To find out the outcome and complications of open inguinal hernia repair with prolene mesh.&#x0D; Methods: This is a prospective cross sectional study conducted at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, from December, 2011 to May, 2012. One hundred patients of inguinal hernia admitted in different surgical units of BSMMU, Dhaka for elective surgery were studied. We have given 1 gm ijv Cephradine per operatively and then 500 gm cephradine ijv 6 hourly for 24 hours followed by oral form of Cephradine for next 5 days. Polypropylene mesh of 11 cm x 7 cm size was used in all cases. All the operations were done by open tension free prolene mesh repair technique. Patients were followed for one year to see the outcome.&#x0D; Results: Out of 100 cases of inguinal hernia, 71 patients (71%) had indirect inguinal hernia and 29 cases (29%) had direct inguinal hernia; 90 cases (90%) were primary hernia and only 10 cases (10%) were recurrent hernia; 58 cases were right sided, 34 cases (34%) were left sided and 8 cases (8%) were bilateral. Complications of mesh repair of groin hernia in this study included wound infection (5%), scrotal oedema (2%), mesh infection (0%), scrotal hematoma (2%), echymoces of peri-incisional skin (5%), early wound and groin pain (7%), chronic inguinodynia (2%), hernia recurrence (1%).&#x0D; Conclusion: In the present study an attempt is made to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair by prolene mesh. The results confirm that Lichtenstein tension free mesh repair of inguinal hernia is safe and reliable for both primary and recurrent groin hernia, with less recurrence rate. Patient's compliance was good with minimum morbidity.&#x0D; Journal of Surgical Sciences (2018) Vol. 22 (1): 21-24

Comparative Study between No Mesh Inguinal Hernia Repair (Desarda Technique) and Mesh Hernioplasty and its Outcome

Comparative Study between No Mesh Inguinal Hernia Repair (Desarda Technique) and Mesh Hernioplasty and its Outcome

Tension-free mesh repair of inguinal hernia in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is the first-line renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal failure patients in Hong Kong. Abdominal wall hernia is a common mechanical complication of PD, and early surgical repair has been advocated to reduce complications. This study aims to review the outcomes of tension-free mesh repair of inguinal hernia in PD patients. All PD patients who underwent elective repair of inguinal hernia from 2009 to 2015 were identified from a single centre for retrospective analysis. Primary outcomes included surgical complications, perioperative dialysis technique and recurrence. Twenty-one patients with a total of 26 inguinal hernia repairs were included in this 7-year retrospective study. All were males, and the mean age was 68 ± 10 years. Diabetic nephropathy (n = 9, 42.9%) and glomerulonephritis (n = 7, 33.3%) were the two most common causes of renal failure. All hernias were detected after the initiation of PD, and the mean duration of PD to hernia detection was 16 months (range 1-65 months). Lichtenstein open mesh repair was performed in all patients. Complications included seroma (n = 3, 11.5%) and ischaemic orchitis (n = 1, 3.8%). There were no mesh infection or recurrence. Twenty patients (95.2%) received intermittent peritoneal dialysis post-operatively and returned to continuous ambulatory PD in 15 to 30 days. Only one patient (4.8%) required bridging haemodialysis due to Tenckhoff catheter blockage. Tension-free mesh repair is associated with low morbidity and low recurrence rates in PD patients. Timely management and close collaboration with renal physicians are essential to continue PD after repair.