More than sixty years ago, Mr. Justice BLACK, dissenting to the action of the Court disposing of the case without oral argument, stated that: Unless we make the requirements for administrative action strict and demanding, expertise, the strength of modern government, can become a which rules with no practical limits on its discretion. Absolute discretion, like corruption, marks the beginning of the end of liberty. This case is perhaps insignificant in the annals. But the standard set for men of good will is even more useful to the venal. See New York v. United States, 342 US 882, 96 L. Ed. 662, 72 S. Ct. 152 - Supreme Court, 1951.Five years later, Mr. Justin Miller, a former judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, expressed his general attitude toward administrative agencies, as follows: (1) They violate the constitutional concept of separation of powers and the tripartite form of government contemplated by the Constitution-makers and have brought back to the United States the very system of governmental controls from which our predecessors were trying to escape; (2) They have, in fact, brought back those very evils of arbitrary government which prompted that desire to escape; they frequently get out of hand and sometimes deliberately violate the mandates given to them by Congress... See Advocate before Administrative Agencies, 1956 U. Ill. L.F. 189 (1956).In this research paper, the author will demonstrate that the United States Merit Systems Protection Board, in the absence of a proper judicial review, has received that absolute power to serve its own and not the public's interest, which turned it into that monster that violates the mandates given to it by Congress and the Constitution. As a result of such usurpation of power, the Board has effectively nullified those provisions of a Veterans Preference Act of 1944 that non-veterans do not enjoy, while enforcing other provisions of the act that cover non-veterans rights as well. The author will also show that, because of the Board actions or failures thereof, the selection process for federal positions has become subject to various manipulations, which resulted in other prohibited personnel practices such as nepotism and favoritism, the latter of which evils or its perceptions, has recently prompted the Board to call for Congress to repeal a statute that feeds the same, because of its apparent inability to enforce that law. The author's observation of the Board rules, decisions and practices will lead him to an inescapable conclusion that those veterans, who seek a fair resolution of their employment issues with federal agencies, should do so in U.S. district courts, whenever such opportunity presents itself.