Studies have shown that mental rehearsal can facilitate the learning of a motor skill (e.g., Rawlings, et al., 1972) . Richardson (1969) claimed that imagery capacity was an important factor in predicting improvement in motor performance following mental re. hearsal. T o study further the effects of visual-imagery ability on performance of a motor task following mental rehearsal, 47 female college students were given concentrated physical pracdce in rotary pursuit tracking on a Marietta rotor ( 6 0 rpm, 50-sec. work, 10-sec. rest). The pre-rest practice lasted 5 min. followed by a 10-min, rest and 5 min. of ost resc practice. During the 10-min. rest, 35 Ss mentally rehearsed the tracking task E r ; min. ar either the beginning, middle or end of the rest interval. Twelve Ss performed an irrelevant task during the rest period. The major dependent variables were reminiscence and performance decrement which, as Amrnons ( 195 1 ) suggested, are likely ro be reduced by mental rehearsal. Thus, it was predicted that 5s with greater efficiency in visual imagery would have lower reminiscence and performance decrement. Reminiscence scores were obtained by subtracting the total time on target of the last prerest trial from the total time on target of the first posrrest trial (17 5s with controllable imagery 6.86 ? 2.54, 18 5s with autonomous imagery 10.05 ? 4.19, 12 conr~ols 11.12 +5.57). Performance decrement scores were obtained by subtracting total ume on target of the first postrest trial from the total time on target of the last postrest trial (17 Ss with controllable imagery .69 & 5.42, 18 Ss with autonomous imagery 3 2 2 3.21, 12 controls -4.12 2 6.57). Efficiency of visual imagery of the 35 Ss who mentally rehearsed was measured by the revised Gordon Test of Visual Imagery Control (Richardson, 1969) . The 17 Ss who scored above the median on this test were designated Controllable Visual Imagery Ss and the 18 who scored below, as Autonomous Visual Imagery Ss. Analyses of variance indicated that high scorers had significantly lower reminiscence than low scorers ( f i < ,001). There was no difference, however, on performance decrement for the groups. Time of mental rehearsal during the resc did not affect the two performance varrables. $-rest comparisons of the control group (N = 1 2 ) with the controllable imagcry and autonomous imagery groups, respectively, showed that only the former was s ~ g n ~ f ~ c a n t l y lower on reminiscence (c = 2.67, p < .02 for 27 df) and performance decrement ( t = 2.08, f i < .O5 for 27 df). Results confirm that visual imagery control is an essential ingredient in the effecrive mental rehearsal of a motor skill. Greater inhibition built u p during mental rehearsal is a plausible explanation of depressed reminiscence for Ss with control over imagery. Motivational factors may affect performance decrement; however, more research is required to clarify this phenomenon.