Members Of Multidisciplinary Team Research Articles

Standardization of rehabilitation medical cards for adult patients with musculoskeletal and peripheral nervous systems dysfunction

Currently, each rehabilitation institution solves the problem of registration of rehabilitation medical records empirically, based on the existing realities of a particular institution.
 The study examined the development of a medical history template for the in- and outpatient medical rehabilitation of patients with peripheral nervous system (PNS) and musculoskeletal system (MSA) dysfunction.
 The medical history template corresponded to the currently approved forms 003/y (Medical record for inpatient care) and 025/y (Medical record for outpatient care) but supplemented with chapters, allowing entry of information in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation Order for medical rehabilitation of adults (No. 788n dated July 31, 2020). Additional chapters, forms, and appendices designed to include specific information about the rehabilitation process included the physical and rehabilitation medicine doctor examination list, multidisciplinary rehabilitation team members, examination lists, rehabilitation routing scale blank, list of MDRC discussions, individual patient management forms, standard rehabilitation discharge form, and list of rehabilitation quality criteria for adult patients with MSA/PNS dysfunction. Validated scales and test forms were also included.
 The unification of rehabilitation medical records for patients with MSA/PNS impairment makes it easier for the staff of the rehabilitation departments and centers to file medical records in accordance with the current legislation.

Child Life Services for Siblings of Chronically Ill Children

Objective: Siblings of children with chronic illnesses are at high risk of adverse psychosocial and developmental outcomes, yet limited sibling-specific services are available at most pediatric healthcare facilities. Child life specialists are often the professionals most focused on and available to provide education, emotional support, and therapeutic play to support sibling coping needs in this context; however, little is known about the scope and availability of child life services for siblings of children with chronic illnesses. Therefore, the purpose of this survey-based study was to examine the type and frequency of child life services available to siblings in pediatric healthcare settings in North America, and to identify barriers to sibling support provision. Method: Survey-based study, across the 76 participants. Results: A variety of sibling support frequencies and service types were identified, as well as barriers related to lack of clinical staffing, hospital-imposed visitation restrictions, and limited sibling support referrals from multidisciplinary team members. Conclusion: Noting these opportunities and limitations, it is crucial that healthcare administrators and institutions invest monetary and staffing resource to better meet the needs of siblings of hospitalized children. Disclosure Statement: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). Funding Statement: No funding sources were provided by the author(s).

A health system's journey to preventing workplace violence: Use of multidisciplinary teamwork to unify efforts across a health system.

Workplace violence (WPV) is known to threaten the safety of patients and staff. In 2018, a wellness survey showed many employees had not received training on WPV prevention and felt unprepared to manage aggression. The health network's leaders knew they needed to take action. From various multidisciplinary committees, the leaders were able to create a comprehensive WPV prevention program. Some of the highlights of this program include forming a centralized security department, codes of conduct, and crisis response process, adopting tools to predict violence, and providing a range of education. Data from WPV events showed the health network had a statistically significant reduction in WPV events from 2020 to 2021. However, WPV events increased in 2022. This increase in 2022 mirrors national trends in WPV. There are a number of factors that may have impacted this increase. Regardless, the leaders at the health network are dedicated to continuously improving the WPV prevention program. Some of the ongoing projects include improving data collection methods and building a long-term notification for highly violent individuals. This WPV prevention program relies on the commitment of its multidisciplinary team members and focuses on taking care of patients while also prioritizing the wellness of the staff.

What makes a multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people work well in primary care? A realist review and synthesis

BackgroundA third of older people take five or more regular medications (polypharmacy). Conducting medication reviews in primary care is key to identify and reduce/ stop inappropriate medications (deprescribing). Recent recommendations for effective deprescribing include shared-decision making and a multidisciplinary approach. Our aim was to understand when, why, and how interventions for medication review and deprescribing in primary care involving multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) work (or do not work) for older people.MethodsA realist synthesis following the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards guidelines was completed. A scoping literature review informed the generation of an initial programme theory. Systematic searches of different databases were conducted, and documents screened for eligibility, with data extracted based on a Context, Mechanisms, Outcome (CMO) configuration to develop further our programme theory. Documents were appraised based on assessments of relevance and rigour. A Stakeholder consultation with 26 primary care health care professionals (HCPs), 10 patients and three informal carers was conducted to test and refine the programme theory. Data synthesis was underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory to identify key mechanisms to enhance the implementation of MDT medication review and deprescribing in primary care.FindingsA total of 2821 abstracts and 175 full-text documents were assessed for eligibility, with 28 included. Analysis of documents alongside stakeholder consultation outlined 33 CMO configurations categorised under four themes: 1) HCPs roles, responsibilities and relationships; 2) HCPs training and education; 3) the format and process of the medication review 4) involvement and education of patients and informal carers. A number of key mechanisms were identified including clearly defined roles and good communication between MDT members, integration of pharmacists in the team, simulation-based training or team building training, targeting high-risk patients, using deprescribing tools and drawing on expertise of other HCPs (e.g., nurses and frailty practitioners), involving patents and carers in the process, starting with ‘quick wins’, offering deprescribing as ‘drug holidays’, and ensuring appropriate and tailored follow-up plans that allow continuity of care and management.ConclusionWe identified key mechanisms that could inform the design of future interventions and services that successfully embed deprescribing in primary care.

330 Evaluating anticoagulant prescribing errors in older adults in a rehabilitation setting

Abstract Background Anticoagulant use is common in older adults for the prevention or treatment of a number of conditions, most commonly Venous Thrombo-Embolism (VTE) or to prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation. Our audit aimed to review anticoagulation prescribing practices, identify errors and areas for improvement. Methods The initial retrospective audit of all inpatients in a medical gerontology ward took place from 15/11/2022–30/12/22. Data collected included age, sex, weight, renal profile, anticoagulation type, dose and indication. Information was collected from medication records, clinical notes and online laboratory system. After initial audit, multiple education sessions were conducted with the medical team. Re-audit of all inpatients occurred from 05/04/2023–25/04/2023. The guidelines used were the HSE Prescribing Tips for Anticoagulation and local Hospital Guidelines on VTE prophylaxis. Results The initial audit of 73 patients showed 15% (11) rate of prescribing error with 7 subtherapeutic and 4 supratherapeutic doses. Of these 11 errors, 4 doses were corrected recently prior to audit. Average age was 82.6 (64–100) and 55% (40) were female. The re-audit of 51 patients showed the rate of error improved to 7.84%(4) with 4 supratherapeutic doses. 1 dose was corrected on admission and 5.88%(3) required dose adjustment due to fluctuations in weight and renal function throughout admission. Average age was 83.1(66–103) and 69%(35) were female. Conclusion The re-audit demonstrated ongoing education sessions reduces prescribing error with a 48% reduction. However ongoing monitoring throughout admission is required to account for fluctuations in weight and renal function. Suggestions for further improvements include ongoing regular education sessions with the medical team. Further sessions are planned with the wider multidisciplinary team members to highlight importance of regularly monitoring weight and renal function and medication dosages. This audit also reinforces the importance of the role of pharmacist in the multidisciplinary team in Rehabilitation Units and would support regular pharmacist input on an regular basis.

Optimizing care of patients undergoing cardiac surgery using a digital platform and a multidisciplinary team approach

ObjectiveRestrictions to care access during the pandemic along with the increasing complexity of patients awaiting cardiac surgery provides unique challenges for care delivery. The University of Ottawa Heart Institute has developed a novel multidisciplinary digital platform, the Prehab Automated Follow-Up (AFU) Program, which delivers patient/caregiver teaching regarding risk factor mitigation, tracks patient symptoms, and screens for optimization using best practice guidelines. This study was conducted to quantify patient outcomes following initiation of the AFU Program. MethodsPatients awaiting elective cardiac surgery are enrolled and screened via automated telephone conversation, according to best practice guidelines, and a Short Form-12 preoperative assessment. Following this screen, patients are referred for an in-person assessment by an appropriate multidisciplinary team member; namely, a diabetes specialist, physiotherapist, dietitian, smoking cessation counselor, social worker, vocational counselor, and/or psychologist. ResultsSince initiation in February 2021, the AFU Program has enrolled more than 1237 patients with 508 multidisciplinary team referrals prompted by the AFU screening platform. Before program initiation, there were no multidisciplinary team referrals for preoperative optimization. Compared with patients treated between February 2020 and February 2021, there was a 2.5% decrease in hospital readmission rate within 30 days of surgery, a 0.6-day shorter hospital stay, and a 2.5% decrease in surgical site infection. ConclusionsOur cardiac surgery AFU Program reduced adverse health outcomes for patients by identifying and optimizing risk factors that increased quality of patient care. The AFU Program provides patient/caregiver engagement through educational support and multidisciplinary team counseling.

Triage for palliative radiotherapy by clinical specialist radiation therapists: A scoping review.

Patients who could benefit from palliative radiotherapy (PRT) may be in different phases of the cancer journey: they may have minimal symptoms and preserved functional status, or could be near end of life, with multiple complex care needs. Efficient triage at PRT referral is crucial to match patients with an appropriate provider and care setting as quickly as possible. Many centres have a dedicated PRT clinic, for which triage occurs by a Palliative Clinical Specialist Radiation Therapist (PCSRT). We performedan English-language literature search of 15 databases, without date limits, based on the PICO framework. After independent screening of titles and abstracts by two authors, relevant full text papers were reviewed. Twenty studies (15 publications and five abstracts) and one government report met inclusion criteria. Studies were published over a 21-year period by investigators from four countries. By identifying bottlenecks, screening out inappropriate referrals, and assessing patients in advance of consult, PSCRT triage decreased wait times by approximately 50%, on average, compared to standard pathways (range 30-82%). Increasing efficiency by pre-booking and coordinating appointments increases patient volumes and optimizes use of resources. A triage PCSRT serving a navigator role improves continuity of care, and in decreasing the number of handoffs, safety as well. Shifting triage to a PCSRT allows multidisciplinary team members to work to their maximum scope. In one clinic, after incorporation of PCSRT triage, use of on-call services decreased, as more patients were seen during daytime appointments, contributing to cost-savings.

What is the role of psychology in bariatric surgery? A survey of the differing views of psychologists, the multidisciplinary team, and patients in the UK.

Although psychologists are a key member of the bariatric multidisciplinary team (MDT), there is a lack of clarity about the specific remit of their role. This exploratory study was conducted to identify differences, priorities and clarify how the role of psychology is perceived in the United Kingdom. We conducted surveys of three major stakeholder groups (psychologists, patients, and the bariatric multidisciplinary team) which focused on their perception of psychology in bariatric surgery. The results showed that in UK bariatric services, psychologists are spending the majority of their clinical time providing pre-operative assessments. Differences emerged between psychologists and MDT in how they viewed the purpose of these assessments, with the MDT viewing them as identifying contraindications to surgery whereas psychologists viewed them as identifying readiness for surgery. A total of 51% of patients reported they had not been able to access psychology services when needed and viewed provision of post-operative psychological support to be a key priority. Key themes and tensions emerged around (a) high demand for services yet limited psychology resource, (b) the purpose of the pre-operative assessment and (c) the provision of pre-operative versus post-operative support. These themes combine and interact in a way that currently makes it extremely challenging to provide coherent psychology services. There is clearly a need for education, consensus and adequate resourcing of the psychology role within bariatric surgery services in the United Kingdom.

Primary care transformation in Scotland: a qualitative study of GPs' and multidisciplinary team members' views.

The Scottish Government's vision to transform primary care includes expansion of the primary care multidisciplinary team (MDT), formalised in the new GP contract in April 2018. To explore practitioners' views on the expansion of MDT working in Scotland. Qualitative study with GPs and a range of MDT staff working in three different population settings in Scotland. In-depth semi-structured interviews were carried out by telephone with 8 GPs and 19 MDT staff between May and June 2022. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify commonalities and divergences in the interviews. Internal challenges facing MDT staff included adapting to the fast pace of primary care, building new relationships, training and professional development needs, line management issues, and monitoring and evaluation of performance. External challenges included the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, lack of time, difficulties with hybrid working, and low staff morale. Most GPs reported that expansion of their roles as expert medical specialists had not yet happened because their workload had not decreased (and in many cases had increased). In deprived areas, insufficient resources to deal with the high numbers of patients with complex multimorbidity remained a key issue. Interviewees in remote and rural settings felt the new contract did not take into account the unique challenges of providing primary care services in such areas, and recruitment and accommodation were cited as particular problems. Although there has been substantial expansion of the primary care MDT, which most GPs welcome, many challenges to effective implementation remain that must be addressed if transformation of primary care in Scotland is to become a reality.

Pyschological traumatic perinatal experiences during the Covid-19 pandemic, epigenetic hypothesis and protective suggestions

AbstractWhether Covid-19 will continue with different viral mutations it will last is not yet known. For this reason, correct management of the process becomes important in order to ensure that future generations are least affected by this experience. This literature review aims to discuss hypotheses for the epigenetic effect of perinatal experiences affecting mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic and protective intervention recommendations. A comprehensive understanding of epigenetic mechanisms can allow early risk detection and directed prevention and intervention strategies. There is a need for epigenetic studies that monitor the short- and long-term effects in women/infants going through the perinatal period during the Covid-19 pandemic. Epigenetic studies are costly and take a long time. At this time where the pandemic is still ongoing, it is predicted that the negative effects will be reduced by predicting epigenetic effects and taking protective approaches in line with the results obtained from previous studies. These will be possible with the collective work of multidisciplinary team members. Mental health care professionals should receive training on epigenetics in the perinatal period and should be able to integrate it into counseling processes.

Vaccination practices in pediatric transplantation: A survey among member centers of the European reference network TransplantChild.

There is considerable variation in vaccination practices between pediatric transplant centers. This study aims to evaluate active immunization attitudes and practices among ERN-TransplantChild centers and identify potential areas of improvement that could be addressed by shared evidence-based protocols. A cross-sectional questionnaire of attitudes and practices toward immunization of pediatric SOT and HSCT candidates and recipients was sent to a representative member of multidisciplinary teams from 27 European centers belonging to the ERN-TransplantChild. A total of 28/62 SOT programs and 6/12 HSCT programs across 21 European centers participated. A quarter of centers did not have an on-site protocol for the immunizations. At the time of transplantation, pediatric candidates were fully immunized (80%-100%) in 57% and 33% of the SOT and HSCT programs. Variations in the time between vaccine administration and admission to the waiting list were reported between the centers, with 2 weeks for inactivated vaccines and variable time (2-4 weeks) for live-attenuated vaccines (LAVs). Almost all sites recommended immunization in the post-transplant period, with a time window of 4-8 months for the inactivated vaccines and 16-24 months for MMR and Varicella vaccines. Only five sites administer LAVs after transplantation, with seroconversion evaluated in 80% of cases. The immunization coverage of European pediatric transplant recipients is still inconsistent and far from adequate. This survey is a starting point for developing shared evidence-based immunization protocols for safe vaccination among pediatric transplant centers and generating new research studies.

Exploring facilitators and barriers associated with oral care for inpatients with dysphagia post-stroke.

To explore the attitudes, facilitators and barriers in providing oral care for inpatients with dysphagia post-stroke as perceived by healthcare professionals. Dysphagia is a common complication of stroke and is associated with a higher incidence of aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition and dehydration. In the acute phase of stroke recovery, a dental professional is not usually part of the multidisciplinary team caring for the patient and oral care is the responsibility of the healthcare professionals in the stroke unit. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to demonstrate the most effective method of providing oral care for patients with dysphagia post-stroke. This was a single-site study conducted with healthcare professionals working in the Stroke Unit of Cork University Hospital in Ireland, using focus groups and a qualitative thematic analysis approach. A total of three focus groups were conducted in the Stroke Unit with 17 healthcare professionals. The focus groups included representation from all healthcare professional groups providing direct clinical care to patients on the Stroke Unit including geriatric medicine, dietetics, speech and language therapy, healthcare assistance, nursing, occupational therapy and physiotherapy. A qualitative thematic analysis was carried out and seven overarching themes emerged from the data. Three themes related to facilitators to providing oral care for this patient group: (i) a focus on oral care in both policy and practice, (ii) expanding professional roles in the provision of oral care, (iii) perceived importance of oral care in recovery and rehabilitation. Four themes related to barriers to the provision of oral care for this patient group: (i) lack of confidence and concerns related to the perceived risk for patients with dysphagia, (ii) unique challenges of patient and stroke-related factors, (iii) lack of resources and time and (iv) perceived importance of oral care in recovery and its relative importance with competing demands. Members of the stroke multidisciplinary team believe that they all have a part to play in the delivery of oral care for patients with dysphagia post-stroke. Opportunities exist for the development of multidisciplinary interventions to improve the oral cavity assessment and oral care provided in the Stroke Unit.

What makes an excellent labour ward co-ordinator? Insights from the multidisciplinary team

Background/Aims Poor multidisciplinary teamwork on labour wards may lead to adverse consequences for women and babies. The labour ward co-ordinator is a central role in the multidisciplinary team; however, there has been little research into explore the skills and attributes necessary for this role. This study aimed to explore the labour ward co-ordinator's skills and attributes and their impact on multidisciplinary team working. Methods Constructive grounded theory was used to explore the perceptions of 21 labour ward multidisciplinary team members recruited using theoretical sampling from a maternity unit in northern England. Results Labour ward co-ordinators play significant roles in ward organisation, team situational awareness and a well-functioning multidisciplinary team. Co-ordinators had situational awareness through a ‘helicopter view’ of the ward, supported decision making and were approachable. Excellent labour ward co-ordinators used situational awareness to pre-empt emergencies and forward plan. Conclusions The labour ward co-ordinator role requires a different skillset to that of midwives delivering one-to-one care in labour. To develop midwives into the co-ordinator role, attention to continuing professional development is essential. Recruitment of consultant midwives dedicated to supporting midwives delivering care to women in labour should be considered.

Experiences of family members of relatives admitted as state patients in a psychiatric hospital

Background: Family members play an important role in caring for state patients during their admission to a psychiatric hospital. They receive limited support from the multidisciplinary team because they do not have a relationship that will promote the families to verbalise their thoughts, rather the interaction that the multidisciplinary team and family members share is about the admitted state patient.Aim: This article explored and described the experiences of family members who have a relative admitted as a state patient in a psychiatric hospital. Based on the findings, specific recommendations were provided to facilitate the mental health of state patients’ family members in the future.Setting: The study was conducted in participants’ homes; only one interview took place in the psychiatric hospital when the family member came to meet the multidisciplinary team.Methods: The study employed a qualitative, exploratory and contextual research design. Family members’ lived experiences were explored using in-depth phenomenological interviews and later analysed.Results: The findings indicated family members experienced negative feelings, a sincere desire to support their relatives and a great need to share information and knowledge about mental illness.Conclusion: The study indicated that state patients’ family members’ mental health should be focused on to improve their understanding of mental illness.Contribution: The findings of this study call for collaboration between the family members, the police and multidisciplinary teams from the hospitals, the mental health awareness and counselling for families.

Impact of Radar Chart-Based Information Sharing in a Multidisciplinary Team on In-Hospital Outcomes and Prognosis in Older Patients With Heart Failure.

Background: A multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is crucial for managing older patients with heart failure (HF). We investigated the impact on clinical outcomes of implementation of a conference sheet (CS) with an 8-component radar chart for visualizing and sharing patient information. Methods and Results: We enrolled 395 older inpatients with HF (median age 79 years [interquartile range 72-85 years]; 47% women) and divided them into 2 groups according to CS implementation: a non-CS group (before CS implementation; n=145) and a CS group (after CS implementation; n=250). The clinical characteristics of patients in the CS group were assessed using 8 scales (physical function, functional status, comorbidities, nutritional status, medication adherence, cognitive function, HF knowledge level, and home care level). In-hospital outcomes (Short Physical Performance Battery, Barthel Index score, length of hospital stay, and hospital transfer rate) were significantly better in the CS than non-CS group. During the follow-up period, 112 patients experienced composite events (all-cause death or admission for HF). Inverse probabilities of treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazard analyses demonstrated a 39% reduction in risk of composite events in the CS group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.97). Conclusions: Radar chart-based information sharing among MDT members is associated with superior in-hospital clinical outcomes and a favorable prognosis.

The role of collaborative decision-making in discharge planning: Perspectives from patients, family members and health professionals.

To explore discharge planning with a range of key stakeholders in subacute care, including consumers. Qualitative descriptive study. Patients (n = 16), families (n = 16), clinicians (n = 17) and managers (n = 12) participated in semi-structured interviews or focus groups. Following transcription, data were analysed thematically. The overarching facilitator of effective discharge planning was collaborative communication, leading to shared expectations by all stakeholders. Collaborative communication was underpinned by four key themes: patient- and family-centred decision-making, early goal setting, strong inter- and intra-disciplinary teamwork, and robust patient/family education. Effective planning for discharge from subacute care is enabled by shared expectations and collaborative communication between key stakeholders. Effective discharge planning processes are underpinned by effective inter- and intra-disciplinary teamwork. Healthcare networks should foster environments that promote effective communication between and within multidisciplinary team members as well as with patients and their families. Applying these principles to discharge planning may assist in reducing length of stays and rates of preventable readmissions post-discharge. This study addressed a lack of knowledge about effective discharge planning in Australian subacute care. It found that collaborative communication between stakeholders was an overarching facilitator of effective discharge planning. This finding impacts subacute service design and professional education. COREQ guidelines were followed in reporting this study. No patient or public contribution in the design, data analysis or preparation of the manuscript.

Get Smart, Canada: Exploring Smart Pump Implementation, Management, and Compliance with Standards through a Nationwide Survey.

Smart pump technology is relatively new, and uncertainty exists regarding best practices for development and management of the drug libraries in these devices. In Canadian hospitals, IV smart pumps and their drug libraries are created and maintained according to recommendations from Accreditation Canada and guidelines from the US Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP). Current compliance with these standards in Canada is unknown. However, neither organization provides specific operational steps detailing how to effectively create and manage a drug library, which leaves significant room for interpretation. Furthermore, the human resources dedicated to creation and management of these libraries in accordance with guidelines and standards are unknown. To describe current compliance with standards and guidelines for smart pump drug libraries; the processes used for drug library set-up, management, training, and support; and the resources currently used for these activities in Canadian hospitals. A 43-question online survey was made available in spring 2021 to multidisciplinary team members involved in implementation of IV smart pumps and/or management of drug libraries in Canadian hospitals. A total of 55 complete or partial responses were received. Most responses indicated that standards set by Accreditation Canada and ISMP were not being met, with only 30% (14/47) updating their libraries at least quarterly and 47% (20/43) performing quality reviews at least every 6 months. Although the majority of respondents reported regular monitoring of compliance, 30% (11/37) did not perform such monitoring. Results further indicated variation across Canadian hospitals in set-up, management, training, and support related to drug libraries, as well as variation in the human resources available for these activities. Canadian health authorities and organizations are not meeting current ISMP and Accreditation Canada standards for smart pumps. Variation exists in terms of strategies for creating and managing drug libraries, as well as in the training and resources needed to support these initiatives. Canadian health authorities and organizations should prioritize meeting these standards and should closely review the resources required to do so.

A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.

Remote home monitoring services were developed and implemented for patients with COVID-19 during the pandemic. Patients monitored blood oxygen saturation and other readings (e.g. temperature) at home and were escalated as necessary. To evaluate effectiveness, costs, implementation, and staff and patient experiences (including disparities and mode) of COVID-19 remote home monitoring services in England during the COVID-19 pandemic (waves 1 and 2). A rapid mixed-methods evaluation, conducted in two phases. Phase 1 (July-August 2020) comprised a rapid systematic review, implementation and economic analysis study (in eight sites). Phase 2 (January-June 2021) comprised a large-scale, multisite, mixed-methods study of effectiveness, costs, implementation and patient/staff experience, using national data sets, surveys (28 sites) and interviews (17 sites). Phase 1 Findings from the review and empirical study indicated that these services have been implemented worldwide and vary substantially. Empirical findings highlighted that communication, appropriate information and multiple modes of monitoring facilitated implementation; barriers included unclear referral processes, workforce availability and lack of administrative support. Phase 2 We received surveys from 292 staff (39% response rate) and 1069 patients/carers (18% response rate). We conducted interviews with 58 staff, 62 patients/carers and 5 national leads. Despite national roll-out, enrolment to services was lower than expected (average enrolment across 37 clinical commissioning groups judged to have completed data was 8.7%). There was large variability in implementation of services, influenced by patient (e.g. local population needs), workforce (e.g. workload), organisational (e.g. collaboration) and resource (e.g. software) factors. We found that for every 10% increase in enrolment to the programme, mortality was reduced by 2% (95% confidence interval: 4% reduction to 1% increase), admissions increased by 3% (-1% to 7%), in-hospital mortality fell by 3% (-8% to 3%) and lengths of stay increased by 1.8% (-1.2% to 4.9%). None of these results are statistically significant. We found slightly longer hospital lengths of stay associated with virtual ward services (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.09), and no statistically significant impact on subsequent COVID-19 readmissions (adjusted odds ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.02). Low patient enrolment rates and incomplete data may have affected chances of detecting possible impact. The mean running cost per patient varied for different types of service and mode; and was driven by the number and grade of staff. Staff, patients and carers generally reported positive experiences of services. Services were easy to deliver but staff needed additional training. Staff knowledge/confidence, NHS resources/workload, dynamics between multidisciplinary team members and patients' engagement with the service (e.g. using the oximeter to record and submit readings) influenced delivery. Patients and carers felt services and human contact received reassured them and were easy to engage with. Engagement was conditional on patient, support, resource and service factors. Many sites designed services to suit the needs of their local population. Despite adaptations, disparities were reported across some patient groups. For example, older adults and patients from ethnic minorities reported more difficulties engaging with the service. Tech-enabled models helped to manage large patient groups but did not completely replace phone calls. Limitations included data completeness, inability to link data on service use to outcomes at a patient level, low survey response rates and under-representation of some patient groups. Further research should consider the long-term impact and cost-effectiveness of these services and the appropriateness of different models for different groups of patients. We were not able to find quantitative evidence that COVID-19 remote home monitoring services have been effective. However, low enrolment rates, incomplete data and varied implementation reduced our chances of detecting any impact that may have existed. While services were viewed positively by staff and patients, barriers to implementation, delivery and engagement should be considered. This study is registered with the ISRCTN (14962466). This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (RSET: 16/138/17; BRACE: 16/138/31) and NHSEI and will be published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 11, No. 13. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health and Care Research or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Unpacking the Broad Landscape of Intraoperative Stressors for Clinical Personnel: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

The main goals of this mixed-methods systematic review are to identify what types of intraoperative stressors for operating room personnel have been reported in collected studies and examine the characteristics of each intraoperative stressor. With a systematic literature search, we retrieved empirical studies examining intraoperative stress published between 2010 and 2020. To synthesize findings, we applied two approaches. First, a textual narrative synthesis was employed to summarize key study information of the selected studies by focusing on surgical platforms and study participants. Second, a thematic synthesis was employed to identify and characterize intraoperative stressors and their subtypes. Ninety-four studies were included in the review. Regarding the surgical platforms, the selected studies mainly focused on minimally invasive surgery and few studies examined issues around robotic surgery. Most studies examined intra-operative stress from surgeons' perspectives but rarely considered other clinical personnel such as nurses and anesthetists. Among seven identified stressors, technical factors were the most frequently examined followed by individual, operating room environmental, interpersonal, temporal, patient, and organizational factors. By presenting stressors as multifaceted elements affecting collaboration and interaction between multidisciplinary team members in the operating room, we discuss the potential interactions between stressors which should be further investigated to build a safe and efficient environment for operating room personnel.

Evidence-Based Teaching Plan, Test, and Evaluation on Caring for Healthcare Provider Second Victims

Background Healthcare providers as second victims witness significant patient or employee crises. Their intense emotional responses have been recognized by healthcare institutions. Purpose The study developed a literature- and expert-validated, evidence-based teaching plan and matching multiple-choice test for nursing staff and professional development educators. The teaching plan can structure educational sessions that disseminate content on second victim experiences. Methods The study used a mixed-method design to build an evidence-based teaching plan and multiple-choice test, and qualitative analysis of second victim literature to generate teaching plan components. Quantitative analysis was used to evaluate experts’ ranks on the teaching plan and pretest drafts. Results The mean pretest score was low, possibly showing that doctoral students may lack knowledge of the second victim phenomenon. Test statistics indicate the need for item revision. Conclusions Teaching sessions based on the revised teaching plan and test might raise awareness of aspects of the second victim experience and program among nursing staff and multidisciplinary team members.