Melphalan And Prednisone Group Research Articles

Addition of thalidomide to melphalan and prednisone treatment prolongs survival in multiple myeloma – a retrospective population based study of 1162 patients

The combination of melphalan and prednisone (MP) has been the standard treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Since the introduction of novel agents, the clinical outcome in MM has improved. Six randomized prospective studies with thalidomide combined with melphalan and prednisone (MPT) compared to MP have been performed, most of them showing that MPT gives a better response rate and median overall survival (OS). Amongst 1843 MM patients admitted to 15 Swedish centres, we selected all patients treated with MP and MPT in first, second, third or fourth line of therapy, in total 888 patients treated with MP and 274 with MPT. Patients were evaluated for response rate, OS and Time to Next Treatment. Multivariate Cox model analysis was made to adjust for different criteria at time for MM-diagnosis. The median OS from beginning of first line of treatment was 2.2/4.2yrs after MP/MPT respectively, and in second, third and fourth line of treatment 1.8/2.9, 1.4/1.6 and 1.1/1.9yrs (P<0.0001, 0.003, 0.74 and 0.235). The relative risk for death in the MPT group vs. the MP group was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.45-0.84) in first and 0.55 (0.38-0.83), P<0.01) in second line. Treatment with MPT gave a significantly better OS rate after both first and second line of therapy when compared with treatment with MP only.

Treatment patterns and outcomes in elderly patients with multiple myeloma

Treatment patterns and outcomes in elderly patients with multiple myeloma

An Overview of the VISTA Trial: Newly Diagnosed, Untreated Patients with Multiple Myeloma Ineligible for Stem Cell Transplantation

Multiple myeloma, a plasma cell neoplasm, is the second most common hematologic malignancy after non-Hodgkins lymphoma and is responsible for 2% of cancer deaths. Melphalan and prednisone (MP) has been the standard treatment in elderly patients for many decades. The VISTA study evaluated the effect of this combination with or without the first-in-class proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in newly diagnosed myeloma patients who were not candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation. Altogether 682 patients were enrolled and prospectively randomized in this trial. All patients received nine 6-week cycles of oral melphalan (9 mg/m(2)) and prednisone (60 mg/m(2)) on days 1-4, either alone or with bortezomib administered intravenously (1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29 and 32 during the first four cycles and on days 1, 8, 22, 29 during remaining course of therapy). Median time to progression (the primary end point of the trial) was 24 months in the bortezomib-containing group compared with 16.6 months in the control group (p < 0.001). Response was evaluated in 337 patients receiving bortezomib compared with 331 patients in the control group who received MP alone; the percentages of partial response or better was 71 vs 35% (p < 0.001), with complete response seen in 30 vs 4%, respectively (p < 0.001). Median response duration in both groups was 19.9 versus 13.1 months, respectively. Median overall survival has not been reached in VMP group compared with 43 months in the MP group (p < 0.001), and this benefit is maintained after long term follow-up and subsequent antimyeloma therapies. Hematological adverse events (AEs) were similar in both groups, although patients in the bortezomib group experienced more frequent peripheral sensory neuropathy (including 13% grade 3, with less than 1% grade 4). Overall, the occurrence of grade 3 AEs was higher in patients receiving bortezomib (53 vs 44%, p = 0.02), but the risk of grade 4 AEs was identical (28 vs 27%). These results confirm the superiority of MP plus bortezomib combination over MP therapy in treatment-naive patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation.

Oral melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: updated results of a randomized controlled trial

AbstractThe initial analysis of the oral combination melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT) in newly diagnosed patients with myeloma showed significantly higher response rate and longer progression-free survival (PFS) than did the standard melphalan and prednisone (MP) combination and suggested a survival advantage. In this updated analysis, efficacy and safety end points were updated. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral MPT or MP alone. Updated analysis was by intention to treat and included PFS, overall survival (OS), and survival after progression. After a median follow-up of 38.1 months, the median PFS was 21.8 months for MPT and 14.5 months for MP (P = .004). The median OS was 45.0 months for MPT and 47.6 months for MP (P = .79). In different patient subgroups, MPT improved PFS irrespective of age, serum concentrations of β2-microglobulin, or high International Staging System. Thalidomide or bortezomib administration as salvage regimens significantly improved survival after progression in the MP group (P = .002) but not in the MPT group (P = .34). These data confirm activity of MPT for PFS but failed to show any survival advantage. New agents in the management of relapsed disease could explain this finding. The study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00232934.

Treatment of Bendamustine and Prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma results in superior complete response rate, prolonged time to treatment failure and improved quality of life compared to treatment with Melphalan and Prednisone—a randomized phase III study of the East German Study Group of Hematology and Oncology (OSHO)

This randomized phase III study compared bendamustine and prednisone (BP) to standard melphalan and prednisone (MP) treatment in previously untreated patients with multiple Myeloma (MM). To be included, patients had to have histologically and cytologically proven stage II with progressive diseases or stage III MM. They were randomly assigned to receive BP (n=68) or MP (n=63). The primary endpoint was the time to treatment failure (TTF). Secondary endpoints included survival, remission rate, toxicity and quality of life. The overall response rate was 75% in the BP and 70% in the MP group. A significantly higher number of patients treated with BP achieved a complete remission than did patients receiving MP (32 vs. 13%; P=0.007), and the maximum response was achieved more rapidly in patients treated with BP compared to those receiving MP (6.8 vs. 8.7 cycles; P<0.02). TTF and remission duration were significantly longer in the BP group. Patients receiving BP had higher QoL scores and reported pain less frequently than patients receiving MP. BP is superior to MP with respect to complete remission rate, TTF, cycles needed to achieve maximum remission and quality of life and should be considered the new standard in first-line treatment of MM patients not eligible for transplantation.

Oral Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide for Multiple Myeloma.

In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, the combination melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide (MPT) induces a fast tumor response with a high response rate, but evidence that this translate into improved outcome is limited. This multicenter trial compared the efficacy and the toxicity of oral MPT with oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) in previously untreated patients. From January 2002 to December 2004, we randomised 255 patients, who were older than 65 years of age (median age 72). Data analysis was performed on July 2005. The MPT regimen included oral melphalan (4 mg/m2 for 7 days) and prednisone (40 mg/m2 7 days) for six four week cycles plus thalidomide (100 mg per day continuously until any sign of relapse or progressive disease) The MP regimen was as MPT without thalidomide. Patients who were not assigned to receive thalidomide were permitted to cross over to receive thalidomide after relapse or disease progression. Patients treated with MPT experienced higher response rates and a longer time to progression (primary end points) than patients who did not receive thalidomide. The overall response rate was 76% for MPT and 48% for MP alone (P<0.0001), and the near complete response rates were 28% and 7%, respectively (P<0.0001). Median progression free survival in the MPT and in the MP groups was 33 months and 14 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.47; P<0.001). MPT increase median progression free survival by almost 19 months. The 2-yr survival rate was 82% in MPT patients and 65% in MP patients (hazard ratio, 0.68; P=0.2). In MPT group, 33 patients did not complete the 6 courses because of progression disease (9), toxicity (16), death (2), and withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up (6). In MP group, 32 patients did not complete the 6 courses because of progression disease (19), toxicity (3), death (3), and withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up (7). By looking at those patients who completed the assigned 6 cycles in both arms, the 2-yr survival rate was 90% in MPT patients and 71% in MP patients, the difference was statistically significant (hazard ratio, 0.39; P<0.01). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 49% of patients treated with MPT and in 25% of those treated with MP: they included thromboembolism (12% versus 2% of patients), infections (10% versus 1%), peripheral neuropathy (10% versus 1%), and hematologic toxicity (22% versus 25%) respectively. In the first 64 patients who received MPT, grade 3–4 adverse events were reported in 58% of patients. In the last 65 MPT patients, the incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events was 40%. By comparing the first cohort with the second one, thromboembolism dropped from 22% to 3% (P<0.01) and neurotoxicity from 13% to 8% (P=NS), respectively. The oral MPT was superior to the standard MP in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. The adequate mangement of side effects reduced toxicity.

Dose-Intensive Melphalan With Stem Cell Support (MEL100) Is Superior to Standard Treatment in Elderly Myeloma Patients

AbstractA clinical relationship between dose-intensity of melphalan and response rate has been demonstrated in multiple myeloma. Promising results have been reported after 200 mg/m2 melphalan, especially in younger patients. It is uncertain whether 100 mg/m2 melphalan (MEL100) can offer similar results in older patients. To address this issue, patients were treated with 2 or 3 MEL100 courses followed by stem cell support. Seventy-one patients (median age, 64 years) entered the protocol at diagnosis. Their clinical outcome was compared with that of 71 pair mates (median age, 64 years) selected from patients treated at diagnosis with oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) and matched for age and β2-microglobulin. Complete remission was 47% after MEL100 and 5% after MP. Median event-free survival was 34 months in the MEL100 group and 17.7 months in the MP group (P < .001). Median overall survival was 56+ months for MEL100 and 48 months for MP (P< .01). In a multivariate analysis, β2-microglobulin levels and MEL100 were independent risk factors associated with outcome: superior event-free and overall survival were observed in patients presenting low β2-microglobulin levels at diagnosis and receiving MEL100 as induction regimen. In conclusion, MEL100 was superior to MP in terms of complete remission rate, event-free survival, and overall survival.

Dose-Intensive Melphalan With Stem Cell Support (MEL100) Is Superior to Standard Treatment in Elderly Myeloma Patients

A clinical relationship between dose-intensity of melphalan and response rate has been demonstrated in multiple myeloma. Promising results have been reported after 200 mg/m2 melphalan, especially in younger patients. It is uncertain whether 100 mg/m2 melphalan (MEL100) can offer similar results in older patients. To address this issue, patients were treated with 2 or 3 MEL100 courses followed by stem cell support. Seventy-one patients (median age, 64 years) entered the protocol at diagnosis. Their clinical outcome was compared with that of 71 pair mates (median age, 64 years) selected from patients treated at diagnosis with oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) and matched for age and β2-microglobulin. Complete remission was 47% after MEL100 and 5% after MP. Median event-free survival was 34 months in the MEL100 group and 17.7 months in the MP group (P &lt; .001). Median overall survival was 56+ months for MEL100 and 48 months for MP (P&lt; .01). In a multivariate analysis, β2-microglobulin levels and MEL100 were independent risk factors associated with outcome: superior event-free and overall survival were observed in patients presenting low β2-microglobulin levels at diagnosis and receiving MEL100 as induction regimen. In conclusion, MEL100 was superior to MP in terms of complete remission rate, event-free survival, and overall survival.

Natural interferon-alpha in combination with melphalan/prednisone versus melphalan/prednisone in the treatment of multiple myeloma stages II and III: a randomized study from the Myeloma Group of Central Sweden

Three hundred thirty-five previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma in clinical stages II and III entered a randomized trial comparing intermittent oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) therapy (n = 171) with MP in combination with natural (leukocyte-derived) alpha- interferon (MP/IFN) (n = 164). The treatment groups were comparable with regard to major prognostic factors. The response frequency was 42% in the MP group and 68% in the MP/IFN group (P &lt; .0001). Eighty-five percent of IgA myelomas and 71% of Bence-Jones myelomas responded to MP/IFN compared with 48% and 27%, respectively, to MP treatment (P = .001). There was no difference in the overall survival between the two treatment groups. However, the survival of 72 patients with IgA or Bence-Jones myeloma randomized to receive MP/IFN was significantly longer (median 32 months) than that of 71 patients treated with MP (median 17 months) (p &lt; .05). No statistically significant difference in response frequency (60% v 46%) or survival was found for patients with IgG myeloma. Hematologic toxicity, WHO grades III and IV, was higher in the MP/IFN group (48%) than in the MP group (33%) (P &lt;.05) during the induction treatment period. Flulike syndrome was observed in 68% of patients receiving MP/IFN. The results show that MP/IFN is a well-tolerated treatment regimen, superior to MP for remission induction, and it improves significantly the overall survival for patients with IgA and Bence-Jones myelomas.

Natural interferon-alpha in combination with melphalan/prednisone versus melphalan/prednisone in the treatment of multiple myeloma stages II and III: a randomized study from the Myeloma Group of Central Sweden

AbstractThree hundred thirty-five previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma in clinical stages II and III entered a randomized trial comparing intermittent oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) therapy (n = 171) with MP in combination with natural (leukocyte-derived) alpha- interferon (MP/IFN) (n = 164). The treatment groups were comparable with regard to major prognostic factors. The response frequency was 42% in the MP group and 68% in the MP/IFN group (P < .0001). Eighty-five percent of IgA myelomas and 71% of Bence-Jones myelomas responded to MP/IFN compared with 48% and 27%, respectively, to MP treatment (P = .001). There was no difference in the overall survival between the two treatment groups. However, the survival of 72 patients with IgA or Bence-Jones myeloma randomized to receive MP/IFN was significantly longer (median 32 months) than that of 71 patients treated with MP (median 17 months) (p < .05). No statistically significant difference in response frequency (60% v 46%) or survival was found for patients with IgG myeloma. Hematologic toxicity, WHO grades III and IV, was higher in the MP/IFN group (48%) than in the MP group (33%) (P <.05) during the induction treatment period. Flulike syndrome was observed in 68% of patients receiving MP/IFN. The results show that MP/IFN is a well-tolerated treatment regimen, superior to MP for remission induction, and it improves significantly the overall survival for patients with IgA and Bence-Jones myelomas.

A randomized trial of melphalan and prednisone versus melphalan, prednisone, cyclophosphamide, MeCCNU, and vincristine in untreated multiple myeloma.

In a randomized study with 234 previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma, 129 were treated with melphalan (8 mg/m2 perorally for four days) and prednisone (40 mg/m2 perorally for seven days, both every four weeks) and 105 with melphalan and prednisone at the same doses plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2 intravenously every four weeks), MeCCNU (100 mg/m2 PO every eight weeks), and vincristine (MPCCV, 0.6 mg/m2 IV every four weeks). A total of 49 (38%) of the 129 patients treated with melphalan and prednisone (MP) and 48 (46%) of the 105 patients treated with MPCCV showed good response (GR) (P not significant); the overall response rates were 58% and 70%, respectively. Thirty-seven percent of the MP group and 39% of the MPCCV group remain alive at 48 months from first treatment (P not significant). The estimated 48-month survival from first treatment, according to different prognostic factors at diagnosis, in both groups was as follows: stage 1,56%; stage II, 46%, and stage III, 23% (I and II v III P less than .001). Survival at 48 months according to response was GR, 68%; partial response (PR), 33%; and null, 16% (GR v null, P less than .0005; GR v PR, P less than .0005). Survival according to renal function was 43% for a creatinine level less than 2 mg/100 mL and 27% for a creatine level greater than or equal to 2 mg/100 mL (P less than .0005). No significant difference has been found between the two treatment schedules in terms of response rate and survival time, in any stage of disease.