MEK Inhibitor Treatment Research Articles

A high-throughput customized cytokinome screen of colon cancer cell responses to small-molecule oncology drugs.

Inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors are molecular messengers that circulate and have the capability to modify the tumor microenvironment and impact therapeutic response. The characterization of soluble mediators as biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis is of interest in oncology. We utilize the cytokinome to characterize the response of colorectal tumor cell lines to selected small-molecules in oncology as a proof-of-concept dataset with immunomodulatory analyte heat map rankings for drug and cell line combinations. We observed overall trends in drug class effects with MEK-, BRAF-, PARP-inhibitors, and Imipridones in cytokine, chemokine, and growth factor responses that may help guide therapy selection. MEK-inhibitor treatment downregulated analytes VEGF, CXCL9/MIG, and IL-8/CXCL8 and upregulated CXCL14/BRAK, Prolactin, and CCL5/RANTES. BRAF-inhibitor treatment downregulated VEGF and IL-8/CXCL8, while increasing soluble TRAIL-R2. Treatment with PARP-inhibitors decreased CXCL9/MIG, IL-8/CXCL8, CCL3/MIP-1 alpha, VEGF, and CXCL14/BRAK, while treatment increased soluble TRAIL-R2 and prolactin. Treatment with Imipridones decreased CCL3/MIP-1 alpha, VEGF, CXCL14/BRAK, IL-8/CXCL8, and Prolactin and increased CXCL5/ENA-78. We also observed differential responses to therapeutics depending on the mutational profile of the cell line. In the future, a similar but larger dataset may be utilized in the clinic to aid in the prediction of patient response to immunomodulatory therapies based on tumor genotype.

MEK inhibition ameliorates social behavior phenotypes in a Spred1 knockout mouse model for RASopathy disorders

BackgroundRASopathies are a group of disorders that result from mutations in genes coding for proteins involved in regulating the Ras-MAPK signaling pathway, and have an increased incidence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Legius syndrome is a rare RASopathy caused by loss-of-function mutations in the SPRED1 gene. The patient phenotype is similar to, but milder than, Neurofibromatosis type 1—another RASopathy caused by loss-of-function mutations in the NF1 gene. RASopathies exhibit increased activation of Ras-MAPK signaling and commonly manifest with cognitive impairments and ASD. Here, we investigated if a Spred1-/- mouse model for Legius syndrome recapitulates ASD-like symptoms, and whether targeting the Ras-MAPK pathway has therapeutic potential in this RASopathy mouse model.MethodsWe investigated social and communicative behaviors in Spred1-/- mice and probed therapeutic mechanisms underlying the observed behavioral phenotypes by pharmacological targeting of the Ras-MAPK pathway with the MEK inhibitor PD325901.ResultsSpred1-/- mice have robust increases in social dominance in the automated tube test and reduced adult ultrasonic vocalizations during social communication. Neonatal ultrasonic vocalization was also altered, with significant differences in spectral properties. Spred1-/- mice also exhibit impaired nesting behavior. Acute MEK inhibitor treatment in adulthood with PD325901 reversed the enhanced social dominance in Spred1-/- mice to normal levels, and improved nesting behavior in adult Spred1-/- mice.LimitationsThis study used an acute treatment protocol to administer the drug. It is not known what the effects of longer-term treatment would be on behavior. Further studies titrating the lowest dose of this drug that is required to alter Spred1-/- social behavior are still required. Finally, our findings are in a homozygous mouse model, whereas patients carry heterozygous mutations. These factors should be considered before any translational conclusions are drawn.ConclusionsThese results demonstrate for the first time that social behavior phenotypes in a mouse model for RASopathies (Spred1-/-) can be acutely reversed. This highlights a key role for Ras-MAPK dysregulation in mediating social behavior phenotypes in mouse models for ASD, suggesting that proper regulation of Ras-MAPK signaling is important for social behavior.

Abstract LB261: BRAF inhibitor reprograms cancer-associated fibroblasts to elicit matrix remodeling and therapeutic escape in melanoma

Abstract The tumor stroma and its cellular components are known to play important roles in tumor resilience towards treatment but remain to be urgently characterized in melanoma targeted therapy. By performing a paired-analysis of melanoma tissue samples collected from the patients before and after combined BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi)/MEK inhibitors (MEKi) treatment, we discovered that the number of intratumoral cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) increased significantly in BRAFi/MEKi-treated melanoma stroma comparing with the samples before the therapy. Those intratumoral CAFs exhibit increased amounts of nuclear β-catenin under BRAFi/MEKi therapy. Further studies show that BRAFi not only leads to increased β-catenin nuclear accumulation in CAFs and enhances their biological properties, suggesting BRAFi induces a new resistant phenotype in CAFs. In both in vitro and in vivo models, depleting β-catenin in CAFs abolishes their ability to elicit melanoma cell growth and drug resistance. BRAFi induces BRAF and CRAF dimerization and subsequently the activation of MEK/ERK signaling in CAFs, leading to the inactivation of the β-catenin destruction complex. RNA-Seq data reveals that nuclear β-catenin is a major regulator of CAF phenotype. We identify matricellular protein periostin (POSTN) as a downstream effector of β-catenin. In melanoma, POSTN is uniquely expressed in CAFs, and BRAFi can specifically upregulate POSTN production in CAFs but not in melanoma cells. Recombinant POSTN contributes to melanoma cell BRAFi/MEKi resistance and can compensate for the loss of β-catenin in CAFs. By reactivating ERK pathway in melanoma cells through PI3K/AKT signaling, POSTN compensates for the loss of β-catenin in CAFs in conferring melanoma cell BRAFi/MEKi resistance. In summary, our data reveal a novel resistance mechanism in melanoma that is elicited by BRAFi-induced non-canonical nuclear β-catenin signaling in CAFs and reveal POSTN as an important matrix target to eliminate BRAFi/MEKi resistance in melanoma. Citation Format: Tianyi Liu, Linli Zhou, Yuhang Zhang. BRAF inhibitor reprograms cancer-associated fibroblasts to elicit matrix remodeling and therapeutic escape in melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB261.

Abstract 1106: BRAF and EGFR fusion as a novel mechanism of resistance mechanism to Lazertinib, 3rd- generation EGFR-TKI, in EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Abstract Background: EGFR-TKI is an established first-line therapy for NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations. Osimertinib, third-generation EGFR TKI, was investigated as a first-in-class drug, but lazertinib(YH25448) was also reported as an outstanding drug which had similar efficacy as osimertinib. Nevertheless, acquired resistance is inevitably developed by third-generation EGFR-TKIs in clinic. Even though EGFR C797S mutation has been identified as a major resistant mechanism, the remaining resistance mechanisms to these TKIs are largely unknown. Methods: To explore the mechanism of resistance to lazertinib, we firstly established drug-resistant cells to lazertinib in vitro using four NSCLC cells including the patient-derived cell line (PDC), patient-derived tumor xenograft cell line (PDTC), and ATCC cell lines. To analyze the changes in global genetic alterations and gene expression of established lazertinib-resistant cell lines(YH1R), whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) were performed. The effect of EGFR/BRAF fusion was investigated in vitro using established YH1R cell line and various patient-derived tumor xenograft samples. Western blot study was used to investigate EGFR and MAPK cascade signaling pathway. We evaluated antitumor activity of MEK inhibitor and lazertinib combination treatment in lazertinib-resistant NSCLC cells with EGFR/BRAF fusion in vitro and in vivo. Results: RNA-seq data revealed a novel EGFR/BRAF fusion transcript (EGFR Exon 19-BRAF Exon 9, in-frame fusion) in lazertinib-resistant PC9GR_YH1R. The fusion gene consisted of EGFR (Exon 1-19) portion and BRAF kinase domain (Exon 9-18). The EGFR/BRAF fusion mRNA and protein were specifically upregulated in PC9GR_YH1R compared to parental cells. Intriguingly, we detected the EGFR/BRAF fusion gene expression in patient-derived xenografts (YHIM-1045 and YHIM-1035) obtained from patients who experienced acquired resistance to lazertinib. Compared with treatment with either single agent, combination treatment of lazertinib and MEK inhibitor, trametinib or selumetinib, was significantly effective at inhibiting cell proliferation as well as EGFR signaling pathways in PC9GR_YH1R in vitro and in vivo. Conclusion: We found a novel EGFR/BRAF fusion gene, as a key driver of acquired resistant mechanism of lazertinib, in NSCLC cell lines and patient-derived xenografts with acquired resistance to lazertinib. Combination treatment of lazertinib and MEK inhibitor showed a strong antitumor effect in lazertinib-acquired resistant NSCLCs, indicating that the combination therapy of EGFR and MEK inhibitors might be a promising therapeutic option for overcoming lazertinib-acquired resistant NSCLC patients in clinic. Citation Format: Seo-Yoon Jeong, Jiyeon Yun, San-Duk Yang, Soo-Hwan Lee, Sangbin Lim, Seok-Young Kim, Min Hee Hong, Sun Min Lim, Hye Ryun Kim, Hye Ryun Kim, Byoung Chul Cho. BRAF and EGFR fusion as a novel mechanism of resistance mechanism to Lazertinib, 3rd- generation EGFR-TKI, in EGFR-mutant NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1106.

ERK signaling mediates resistance to immunomodulatory drugs in the bone marrow microenvironment.

Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) have markedly improved patient outcome in multiple myeloma (MM); however, resistance to IMiDs commonly underlies relapse of disease. Here, we identify that tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2) knockdown (KD)/knockout (KO) in MM cells mediates IMiD resistance via activation of noncanonical nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling. Within MM bone marrow (BM) stromal cell supernatants, TNF-α induces proteasomal degradation of TRAF2, noncanonical NF-κB, and downstream ERK signaling in MM cells, whereas interleukin-6 directly triggers ERK activation. RNA sequencing of MM patient samples shows nearly universal ERK pathway activation at relapse on lenalidomide maintenance therapy, confirming its clinical relevance. Combination MEK inhibitor treatment restores IMiD sensitivity of TRAF2 KO cells both in vitro and in vivo. Our studies provide the framework for clinical trials of MEK inhibitors to overcome IMiD resistance in the BM microenvironment and improve patient outcome in MM.

A Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Trametinib and Low-Dose Dabrafenib in Patients with Advanced Pretreated NRASQ61R/K/L Mutant Melanoma (TraMel-WT).

Simple SummaryMEK-inhibitor monotherapy has activity in advanced NRASQ61R/K/L mutant melanoma but is associated with dose-limiting cutaneous toxicity. The combination of a BRAF- with a MEK-inhibitor at their full dose (as in BRAFV600E/K mutant melanoma) has low cutaneous toxicity. We hypothesized that a low dose of the BRAF-inhibitor dabrafenib can mitigate the skin toxicity associated with a full dose of the MEK-inhibitor trametinib in patients with advanced NRASQ61R/K/L mutant melanoma who progressed after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The results of this two-stage phase 2 trial show that addition of a low dose of dabrafenib effectively mitigates the skin toxicity associated with trametinib. This combination is, however, insufficiently active in patients with advanced NRASQ61R/K/L mutant melanoma. The combination of low-dose dabrafenib plus full-dose trametinib can be of further interest for the treatment of MEK-inhibitor-sensitive tumors.Background: MEK-inhibitor monotherapy has activity in advanced NRASQ61R/K/L mutant melanoma but is associated with dose-limiting cutaneous toxicity. The combination of a BRAF- with a MEK-inhibitor at their full dose (as in BRAFV600E/K mutant melanoma) has low cutaneous toxicity. It is unknown whether a low dose of BRAF-inhibitor can mitigate the skin toxicity associated with full-dose MEK-inhibitor treatment in patients with advanced NRASQ61R/K/L mutant melanoma. Methods: This two-stage phase 2 clinical trial investigated trametinib 2 mg once daily in patients with advanced NRASQ61R/K/L mutant melanoma who were pretreated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. In case of trametinib-related cutaneous toxicity, low-dose dabrafenib (50 mg twice daily) was added to prevent recurrent cutaneous toxicity (pre-amendment). Following an amendment, trametinib was combined upfront with low-dose dabrafenib (post-amendment). Objective response rate (ORR) served as the primary endpoint. Results: All 6 patients enrolled pre-amendment developed trametinib-related cutaneous toxicity, necessitating treatment interruption. Combining trametinib with low-dose dabrafenib prevented recurrent skin toxicity thereafter. Trametinib-related skin toxicity was effectively mitigated in all 10 patients post-amendment. In all 16 included patients, the ORR and disease control rate was 6.3% (1 partial response) and 50.0%, respectively. The trial was halted after the first stage. Conclusions: Combining full-dose trametinib with low-dose dabrafenib can mitigate MEK-inhibitor-related skin toxicity but was insufficiently active in this patient population. This combination can be of further interest for the treatment of MEK-inhibitor-sensitive tumors.

BRAF inhibitor treatment is feasible in the oldest-old advanced melanoma patients.

Although new compounds have improved the treatment landscape of metastatic melanoma, very limited data exist on the efficacy and safety of treating older patients with novel agents. Here, we provide results of BRAF (BRAFi) ± MEK (MEKi) inhibitor treatment in patients over 75 years (oldest-old patients) with metastatic melanoma. Between 2011 and 2020, 34 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma over 75 years of age (range 75-89) were treated with BRAFi ± MEKi at the Comprehensive Cancer Center of Helsinki University Hospital. Data on clinical and histopathological features, toxicity, response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were collected. Patients were treated with BRAFi (n = 22) or BRAFi in combination with MEK inhibitor (MEKi) (n = 12). Grade 1-2 adverse events occurred in 68% of the patients, 32% had grade 3 adverse effects, dose reductions were made for 41% of patients and 29% terminated treatment due to toxicity. Overall, the RR was 62%. Complete responses were achieved in 27% of the patients, and 35% had partial responses. The median PFS was 8 months (range 0-57), and the median OS was 15 months (range 0-71). Tailored BRAFi ± MEKi treatment for older patients is feasible. Adverse effects occur frequently but are manageable by dose adjustment. The occurrence of toxicity of monotherapy was similar to that of combination therapy. The RR and median OS from our retrospective study are comparable with those reported in clinical trials and combination therapy produced somewhat more and longer-lasting responses. Hence, it seems that older patients may benefit from BRAFi treatment.

Exploiting Allosteric Properties of RAF and MEK Inhibitors to Target Therapy-Resistant Tumors Driven by Oncogenic BRAF Signaling.

Current clinical RAF inhibitors (RAFi) inhibit monomeric BRAF (mBRAF) but are less potent against dimeric BRAF (dBRAF). RAFi equipotent for mBRAF and dBRAF have been developed but are predicted to have lower therapeutic index. Here we identify a third class of RAFi that selectively inhibits dBRAF over mBRAF. Molecular dynamic simulations reveal restriction of the movement of the BRAF αC-helix as the basis of inhibitor selectivity. Combination of inhibitors based on their conformation selectivity (mBRAF- plus dBRAF-selective plus the most potent BRAF-MEK disruptor MEK inhibitor) promoted suppression of tumor growth in BRAFV600E therapy-resistant models. Strikingly, the triple combination showed no toxicities, whereas dBRAF-selective plus MEK inhibitor treatment caused weight loss in mice. Finally, the triple combination achieved durable response and improved clinical well-being in a patient with stage IV colorectal cancer. Thus, exploiting allosteric properties of RAF and MEK inhibitors enables the design of effective and well-tolerated therapies for BRAFV600E tumors. SIGNIFICANCE: This work identifies a new class of RAFi that are selective for dBRAF over mBRAF and determines the basis of their selectivity. A rationally designed combination of RAF and MEK inhibitors based on their conformation selectivity achieved increased efficacy and a high therapeutic index when used to target BRAFV600E tumors.See related commentary by Zhang and Bollag, p. 1620.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1601.

Targeting SHP2 Sensitizes Papillary Thyroid Cancer Cells to MEK Inhibitors

Background: Pharmacologic targeting of components of the MAPK/ERK pathway in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) is often limited due to the development of adaptive resistance. However, the detailed mechanism of MEK inhibitor (MEKi) resistance is not fully understood. Methods: RNA-seq of the constructed MEKi-resistant DTC cell line BCPAP-R (compared with the BCPAP line) was performed to investigate the intrinsic mechanism of drug resistance. Colony formation assays, cell viability assays, and cell cycle analysis were performed, and various murine models, including xenograft models, long-term MEKi-treated models, and transgenic model were used to evaluate the treatment effect of combination therapy (SHP099 and selumetinib). Findings: MEKi-resistant models were constructed successfully, in which multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) signaling pathways and Src-homology 2 domain-containing phosphatase 2 (SHP2) were activated in MEKi-resistant cells. Given the physiological role of SHP2 as the downstream target of many RTKs, we first found that blockade of SHP2 enhanced the sensitivity to MEKi in constructed MEKi-resistant thyroid cancer models (including constructed cell lines and a long-term MEKi-treated murine model). Interestingly, we also found that compared with MEKi treatment alone, MEKi in combination with an SHP2 inhibitor markedly suppressed the reactivation of the MEK/ERK pathway; thus, the addition of the SHP2 inhibitor significantly improved the anti-tumor effects of MEKi. The synergistic suppression of DTC upon treatment with both inhibitors was futher confirmed in xenograft models and transgenic models. Interpretation: RTKs activation leads to reactivation of the MAPK pathway and resistance to MEKi in DTC, which is reversed by SHP2 blockade. As a novel active inhibitor of SHP2, SHP099 in combination with selumetinib is a promising therapeutic approach for advanced DTC and MEKi-resistant one. Funding Statement: This work was partially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (GRANT no. 81872169), Tianjin Key Research and Development Program Science and Technology Support Key Projects (grant no. 17YFZCSY00690), and Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Project (grant no. 19JCYBJC27400). Declaration of Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Ethics Approval Statement: All animal experiments were approved by the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and the Hospital Animal Care and Use Committee and performed according to the IACUC protocol.

Glucocorticoids attenuate interleukin-6-induced c-Fos and Egr1 expression and impair neuritogenesis in PC12 cells.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a cytokine primarily known for immune regulation. There is also growing evidence that IL-6 triggers neurogenesis and impacts neural development, both life-long occurring processes that can be impaired by early-life and adult stress. Stress induces the release of glucocorticoids by activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. On the cellular level, glucocorticoids act via the ubiquitously expressed glucocorticoid receptor. Thus, we aimed to elucidate whether glucocorticoids affect IL-6-induced neural development. Here, we show that IL-6 signalling induces neurite outgrowth in adrenal pheochromocytoma PC12 cells in a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway-dependent manner, since neurite outgrowth was diminished upon Mek-inhibitor treatment. Using quantitative biochemical approaches, such as qRT-PCR analysis of Hyper-IL-6 treated PC12 cells, we show that neurite outgrowth induced by IL-6 signalling is accompanied by early and transient MAPK-dependent mRNA expression of immediate early genes coding for proteins such as early growth response protein 1 (Egr1) and c-Fos. This correlates with reduced proliferation and prolonged G0/G1 cell cycle arrest as determined by monitoring the cellular DNA content using flow cytometry. These results indicate for IL-6 signalling-induced neural differentiation. Interestingly, the glucocorticoid Dexamethasone impairs early IL-6 signalling-induced mRNA expression of c-Fos and Egr1 and restrains neurite outgrowth. Impaired Egr1 and c-Fos expression in neural development is implicated in the aetiology of neuropathologies. Thus, it appears likely that stress-induced release of glucocorticoids, as well as therapeutically administered glucocorticoids, contribute to the development of neuropathologies by reducing the expression of Egr1 and c-Fos, and by restraining IL-6-dependent neural differentiation.

MEK1/2 activity modulates TREM2 cell surface recruitment

Rare sequence variants in the microglial cell surface receptor TREM2 have been shown to increase the risk for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Disease-linked TREM2 mutations seem to confer a partial loss of function, and increasing TREM2 cell surface expression and thereby its function(s) might have therapeutic benefit in AD. However, druggable targets that could modulate microglial TREM2 surface expression are not known. To identify such targets, we conducted a screen of small molecule compounds with known pharmacology using human myeloid cells, searching for those that enhance TREM2 protein at the cell surface. Inhibitors of the kinases MEK1/2 displayed the strongest and most consistent increases in cell surface TREM2 protein, identifying a previously unreported pathway for TREM2 regulation. Unexpectedly, inhibitors of the downstream effector ERK kinases did not have the same effect, suggesting that noncanonical MEK signaling regulates TREM2 trafficking. In addition, siRNA knockdown experiments confirmed that decreased MEK1 and MEK2 were required for this recruitment. In iPSC-derived microglia, MEK inhibition increased cell surface TREM2 only modestly, so various cytokines were used to alter iPSC microglia phenotype, making cells more sensitive to MEK inhibitor-induced TREM2 recruitment. Of those tested, only IFN-gamma priming prior to MEK inhibitor treatment resulted in greater TREM2 recruitment. These data identify the first known mechanisms for increasing surface TREM2 protein and TREM2-regulated function in human myeloid cells and are the first to show a role for MEK1/MEK2 signaling in TREM2 activity.

Abstract PO-115: Defining mechanisms of resistance in NF1-related malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors

Abstract Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are rare and deadly sarcomas with few therapeutic options. Particularly common in individuals with the tumor predisposition syndrome Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1), MPNSTs are the leading cause of death for NF1 patients and are largely resistant to chemotherapy, with large burden of genomic alterations that make any early response to treatment quickly followed by the development of resistance. NF1 is the major negative regulator of RAS, therefore one of the hallmarks of MPNST is deregulated RAS signaling leading to activation of MEK/ERK. Currently, no targeted therapy has been approved for NF1-related MPNSTs, highlighting the need for a better understanding of the complex signaling in MPNSTs and how mechanisms of resistance arise. To investigate the molecular mechanisms behind NF1-related MPNST resistance, we are using both in vitro and in vivo assays including a drug matrix combination platform and an in vivo model of drug resistance. Using xenografts of NF1-related MPNST germline models, we use a drug holiday approach to promote resistance to targeted kinase inhibition, such as MET and MEK inhibitors. For example, treatment with the MEK inhibitor trametinib initially reduce tumor burden, however after a brief “drug holiday” where the mice received no treatment, tumors regrew and were treated with either a MET inhibitor or a combination of MET and MEK inhibitors. Analysis of these tumors indicate a number of altered pathways that may contribute to resistance, including an upregulation of AKT signaling. These results indicate the need for a closer look at the PI3K/AKT signaling and their role in the resistance in NF1-related MPNSTs. To target adaptive AKT activation upon MEK inhibition we utilized the upregulation of AKT with MEK inhibitor treatment in a matrix drug combination platform using human NF1-related MPNST cell lines. In human MPNST cells, we observed that AKT inhibitors alone or in combination with a MEK inhibitor are not effective in reducing human MPNST cell viability. This is likely due to the presence of complex genomic alterations in these lines and RTK crosstalk signaling that promotes kinome plasticity. Currently we are evaluating other pathways that have been found to drive MEK inhibitor resistance in other RAS-driven cancers. Additionally, we are applying the “drug holiday” approach to a panel of patient derived xenograft (PDX) MPNST models to identify the diversity of resistance mechanisms that are likely present in NF1-related MPNST patients. These studies will enhance our understanding of how genomic alterations in NF1-related MPNST patients promote resistance and identify potential novel therapeutic targets. Citation Format: Lauren McGee, Jamie Grit, Curt Essenburg, Carrie Graveel, Matt Steensma. Defining mechanisms of resistance in NF1-related malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Tumor Heterogeneity: From Single Cells to Clinical Impact; 2020 Sep 17-18. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(21 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-115.

51 Poster Discussion - Vertical pathway inhibition with a SOS1::KRAS inhibitor enhances the efficacy of KRAS G12C inhibitors, delays feedback resistance and demonstrates durable response

BI 1701963 is the first SOS1::KRAS inhibitor, which has entered Phase I clinical trials both as a mono-therapy as well as in combination with MEK inhibitors in patients with KRAS mutated advanced solid tumors. Both, BI 1701963 as well as the previously reported probe compound BI-3406 are orally bioavailable small molecules, designed to bind to the catalytic domain of SOS1, thereby preventing the interaction with GDP-loaded KRAS. In KRAS-dependent cancers, both SOS1::KRAS inhibitors potently reduce the formation of GTP-loaded KRAS and inhibit MAPK pathway signaling. SOS1:: KRAS inhibitors exhibit activity on a broad spectrum of KRAS alleles, including all major G12D/V/C and G13D oncoproteins, while sparing the interaction of KRAS with SOS2. This increases the targetable patient population beyond tumors with a KRAS G12C mutation and suggests a favorable therapeutic window to enable rational combinations. We previously showed that combining the SOS1::KRAS inhibitor BI-3406 with a MEK inhibitor blocks the negative feedback relief induced by MAPK inhibition. Combining SOS1::KRAS inhibition with MEK inhibitor treatment enhances pathway blockade leading to stronger anti-tumor efficacy in xenograft models driven by mutant KRAS such as G12D/V/C, G13D as well as Q61 K.

Activation of CD8+ T Cells Contributes to Antitumor Effects of CDK4/6 Inhibitors plus MEK Inhibitors.

Concurrent MEK and CDK4/6 inhibition shows promise in clinical trials for patients with advanced-stage mutant BRAF/NRAS solid tumors. The effects of CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in combination with BRAF/MEK-targeting agents on the tumor immune microenvironment are unclear, especially in melanoma, for which immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective in approximately 50% of patients. Here, we show that patients progressing on CDK4/6i/MEK pathway inhibitor combinations exhibit T-cell exclusion. We found that MEK and CDK4/6 targeting was more effective at delaying regrowth of mutant BRAF melanoma in immunocompetent versus immune-deficient mice. Although MEK inhibitor (MEKi) treatment increased tumor immunogenicity and intratumoral recruitment of CD8+ T cells, the main effect of CDK4/6i alone and in combination with MEKi was increased expression of CD137L, a T-cell costimulatory molecule on immune cells. Depletion of CD8+ T cells or blockade of the CD137 ligand-receptor interaction reduced time to regrowth of melanomas in the context of treatment with CDK4/6i plus MEKi treatment in vivo Together, our data outline an antitumor immune-based mechanism and show the efficacy of targeting both the MEK pathway and CDK4/6.

The concepts of rechallenge and retreatment in melanoma: A proposal for consensus definitions

Patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma commonly develop resistance to BRAF inhibitor and MEK inhibitor (BRAF/MEKi) treatment, resulting in disease recurrence or progression. Repeated treatment after a break or an intervening therapy may provide clinical benefit. To ensure a common understanding when discussing the treatment of BRAF-mutant melanoma, we propose consensus definitions for retreatment and rechallenge. ‘Retreatment’ should be defined as ‘repeated treatment with the same therapeutic class following relapse after adjuvant treatment has ended.’ Retreatment may be an option for patients with unresectable or metastatic disease who have completed prior adjuvant therapy or discontinued adjuvant therapy early due to toxicity or patients with locoregional recurrence after adjuvant treatment who subsequently underwent resection. ‘Rechallenge’ should be defined as ‘repeated treatment with the same therapeutic class following disease progression in patients who had clinical benefit with prior treatment for unresectable or metastatic disease.’ Rechallenge may be an option for patients who had disease progression after an initial response and received an alternative intervening treatment or patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma who had a treatment break after responding to BRAF/MEKi therapy. Clinical benefits may be possible with repeated BRAF/MEKi treatment because of the role of the MAPK pathway in melanoma oncogenesis and resistance mechanisms specific to BRAF/MEKi, which are discussed in this article. The concepts of retreatment and rechallenge may also be relevant for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with melanoma. Use of consistent terminology will help to stimulate and align further research in this area.

Abstract 2986: NR2F1 underlies persistence of residual disease in melanoma

Abstract Despite the clinical success of targeted therapy and checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma, therapeutic responses are transient, followed by relapse that may be driven by a small subpopulation of residual or drug-tolerant cells. Understanding residual disease and metastasis mechanisms can provide clues both for developing improved versions of a drug and for guiding the selection of appropriate drug combinations for melanoma therapy. Here, we found that the well-known marker of tumor dormancy, Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 2 Group F Member 1 (NR2F1), was overexpressed in minimal disease residual cells following CDK4/6 and MEK inhibitors (CDK4/6i+MEKi) treatment in vivo. Furthermore, melanoma cells overexpressing NR2F1 were less sensitive to (CDK4/6i+MEKi) or BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi+MEKi) treatment in vitro and in vivo models, inhibiting apoptosis. Surprisingly, we did not find any evidence of decreased cell growth in our model. Using a three-dimensional tumor spheroid assay in vitro, we found the NR2F1 expression enhanced melanoma invasion following CDK4/6i+MEKi or BRAFi+MEKi treatments. The use of published RNA Seq data sets that were gathered from the GEO database and Single Cell Seq data sets from PDX melanoma samples showed that high expression of NR2F1 is enriched in the undifferentiated cell state and invasive cells, respectively. Furthermore, BRAF mutant patient sample with an acquired mutation in NRAS Q61R following BRAFi+MEKi+CDKi presented a high expression of NR2F1. Altogether, these findings suggest that NR2F1 may play a role in residual disease persistence besides known features of tumor dormancy, especially important in determining responses to dramatic changes in the environment, such as changes induced by anti-cancer therapy. Citation Format: Manoela Tiago, Jessica L. Teh, Timothy J. Purwin, Weijia Cai, Connor Hollingworth, Melisa Lopez-Anton, Julio A. Aguirre-Ghiso, Andrew E. Aplin. NR2F1 underlies persistence of residual disease in melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2986.

Abstract 923: Pulsatile MEK inhibition improves anti-tumor immunity and T cell function in Kras mutant lung cancer

Abstract KRAS is one of the most commonly identified driver oncogenes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is frequently associated with disease refractory to currently available modalities of treatment. Targeted therapy to inhibit MEK signaling has shown promising tumor growth control in preclinical models, but is followed by quick rebound in tumor growth. Recently, immune checkpoint blockade has demonstrated clinical activity by dis-inhibiting T cells suppressed in the tumor microenvironment. Thus, we sought to identify the most effective therapy for the treatment of KRAS mutant NSCLC patients by targeting cancer cells and activating immune infiltrating cell populations concurrently. To achieve this, we focused on studying the impact of pulsatile MEK inhibition on the immune microenvironment utilizing Kras mutant lung cancer cell lines and Kras mutant transgenic lung cancer mouse models. We found that pulsatile MEK inhibition maintained T cell activation better than continuous treatment ex vivo and in vivo. Treatment with two different MEK inhibitors (selumetinib and trametinib) each resulted in higher CTLA-4 and PD-1 expression in T cells using pulsatile treatment, compared to continuous treatment ex vivo. In addition, the pulsatile schedule showed superior anti-tumor effects and delayed drug resistance compared to continuous administration in vivo. Further, a combination of pulsatile MEK inhibitor treatment and CTLA-4 blockade resulted in the most prolonged survival of Kras tumor-bearing mice. Similar experiments in immune-deficient mice confirmed that this prolonged survival is conferred by adaptive immunity. Our findings set the foundation for a combinatorial therapeutic strategy using pulsatile targeted therapy together with immune checkpoint blockade in patients to optimally enhance tumor apoptosis and promote long-term immune response simultaneously. We are now continuing our studies using a KRAS G12C inhibitor to define its immune modulating properties and will then rationally combine with immune based therapy. Citation Format: Hyejin Choi, Jiehui Deng, Shuai Li, Tarik Silk, Lauren Dong, Elliott J. Brea, Sean Houghton, David Redmond, Hong Zhong, Jonathan Boiarsky, Esra A. Akbay, Paul D. Smith, Taha Merghoub, Kwok-Kin Wong, Jedd D. Wolchok. Pulsatile MEK inhibition improves anti-tumor immunity and T cell function in Kras mutant lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 923.

Reactivation of BMP signaling by suboptimal concentrations of MEK inhibitor and FK506 reduces organ-specific breast cancer metastasis.

TGFβ-SMAD3 signaling is a major driving force for cancer metastasis, while BMP-SMAD1/5 signaling can counteract this response. Analysis of gene expression profiles revealed that an increased TGFβ-SMAD3 and a reduced BMP-SMAD1/5 targeted gene expression signature correlated with shortened distant metastasis free survival and overall survival of patients. At molecular levels, we discovered that TGFβ abolished BMP-induced SMAD1/5 activation in the highly-invasive breast cancer MDA-MB-231cells, but to a less extent in the non-invasive cancer and normal breast cells. This suggests an inverse correlation between BMP signaling and invasiveness of tumor cells and TGFβ signaling acts in a double whammy fashion in driving cancer invasion and metastasis. Sustained ERK activation by TGFβ was specifically observed in MDA-MB-231cells, and MEK inhibitor (MEKi) treatment restored BMP-SMAD1/5 signaling while not affecting SMAD2/3 activation. FK506 potently activated BMP, but not TGFβ signaling in breast cancer cells. MEKi or FK506 alone inhibited MDA-MB-231 extravasation in a zebrafish xenograft cancer model. Importantly, when administrated at suboptimal concentrations MEKi and FK506 strongly synergized in promoting BMP-SMAD1/5 signaling and inhibiting cancer cell extravasation. Furthermore, this combination of suboptimal concentrations treatment in a mouse tumor model resulted in real-time reduction of BMP-SMAD1/5 signaling in live tumors, and consequently potently inhibited tumor self-seeding, liver and bone metastasis, but not lung and brain metastasis. Mechanistically, it is the first time to identify BMP-SMAD1/5 signaling as an underlying molecular driver for organ-specific metastasis. Combining of MEKi and FK506, or their analogues, may be explored for clinical development of breast cancer.

Abstract B36: Therapy-induced YAP hyperactivation is a mechanism driving the evolution of residual disease and resistance to targeted cancer therapy

Abstract Initial profound responses of precision medicines against cancer are limited in duration in part due to residual disease states that are therapy refractory and serve as a prelude to acquired drug resistance and tumor relapse. A prominent clinical example is in the collection of BRAF mutant cancers, including lung cancer and melanoma, which often respond initially, but incompletely and temporarily, to targeted RAF and MEK inhibition. The Hippo pathway transcriptional coactivator, Yes-associated protein (YAP), is a chief mediator of RAF and MEK inhibitor response in BRAF mutant cancers. However, the underlying mechanism for YAP-driven resistance is not fully understood. Here, we modeled the kinetics of patient-derived and isogenic BRAF mutant (V600E) cell lines in response to BRAF inhibitor and MEK inhibitor treatment. Our analysis indicated that in response to drug treatment the cells evolve through a “persister,” residual disease state that is distinct from therapy-naive cells or cells with acquired resistance. We observed that drug treatment induced early nuclear translocalization of YAP and this response peaked at the “persister” cell state before returning towards baseline upon acquired resistance. Additionally, our functional analysis of the proteomic and transcriptional landscape of the “persister” cells demonstrated drug-dependent reversible and concomitant activation of AKT, YAP target gene expression, and an epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT). These programs underlay acquired vulnerabilities, as pharmacologic perturbation of AKT and genetic ablation of YAP was lethal specifically in the “persister” cells. Remarkably, AKT was required and sufficient for drug-induced nuclear localization of YAP, indicating that therapy-mediated hyperactivation of AKT is required for YAP induction and YAP-mediated residual disease. Current studies are focused on characterizing the molecular events causing AKT-mediated hyperactivation of YAP in response to MAPK pathway inhibition. Overall, this work aims to deconvolute a novel molecular mechanism of YAP activation in cancer cells and establish the functional implications of YAP signaling on “persister” cell biology and the evolution of targeted cancer therapy resistance. Citation Format: Aubhishek Zaman, Trever Bivona. Therapy-induced YAP hyperactivation is a mechanism driving the evolution of residual disease and resistance to targeted cancer therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Hippo Pathway: Signaling, Cancer, and Beyond; 2019 May 8-11; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2020;18(8_Suppl):Abstract nr B36.

Modulation of spine fusion with BMP-2, MEK inhibitor (PD0325901), and zoledronic acid in a murine model of NF1 double inactivation

BackgroundSpine fusion is a common procedure for the treatment of severe scoliosis, a frequent and challenging deformity associated with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Moreover, deficiencies in NF1-Ras-MEK signaling affect bone formation and resorption that in turn impacts on spine fusion outcomes. MethodsIn this study we describe a new model for AdCre virus induction of Nf1 deficiency in the spines of Nf1flox/flox mice. The virus is delivered locally to the mouse spine in a fusion procedure induced using BMP-2. Systemic adjunctive treatment with the MEK inhibitor (MEKi) PD0325901 and the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZA) were next trialed in this model. ResultsAdCre delivery resulted in abundant fibrous tissue (Nf1null +393%, P < 0.001) and decreased marrow space (Nf1null −67%, P < 0.001) compared to controls. While this did not significantly impact on the bone volume of the fusion mass (Nf1null −14%, P = 0.999 n.s.), the presence of fibrous tissue was anticipated to impact on the quality of spine fusion. Multinucleated TRAP + cells were observed in the fibrous tissues seen in Nf1null spines. In Nf1null spines, MEKi increased bone volume (+194%, P < 0.001) whereas ZA increased bone density (+10%, P < 0.002) versus BMP-2 alone. Both MEKi and ZA decreased TRAP + cells in the fibrous tissue (MEKi −62%, P < 0.01; ZA −43%, P = 0.054). No adverse effects were seen with either MEKi or ZA treatment including weight loss or signs of illness or distress that led to premature euthanasia. ConclusionsThese data not only support the utility of an AdCre-virus induced knockout spine model, but also support further investigation of MEKi and ZA as adjunctive therapies for improving BMP-2 induced spine fusion in the context of NF1.