Meiotic Cell Division Research Articles

Characterization of a set of novel meiotically-active promoters in Arabidopsis

BackgroundHomologous recombination, together with selection, laid the foundation for traditional plant breeding. The recombination process that takes place during meiotic cell division is crucial for the creation of novel variations of highly desired traits by breeders. Gaining control over this process is important for molecular breeding to achieve more precise, large-scale and quicker plant improvement. As conventional ubiquitous promoters are neither tissue-specific nor efficient in driving gene expression in meiocytes, promoters with high meiotic activities are potential candidates for manipulating the recombination process. So far, only a few meiotically-active promoters have been reported. Recently developed techniques to profile the transcriptome landscape of isolated meiocytes provided the means to discover promoters from genes that are actively expressed in meiosis.ResultsIn a screen for meiotically-active promoters, we examined ten promoter sequences that are associated with novel meiotic candidate genes. Each promoter was tested by expressing a GFP reporter gene in Arabidopsis. Characterization of regulatory regions revealed that these meiotically-active promoters possessed conserved motifs and motif arrangement. Some of the promoters unite optimal properties which are invaluable for meiosis-directed studies such as delivering specific gene expression in early meiosis I and/or meiosis II. Furthermore, the examination of homologs of the corresponding genes within green plants points to a great potential of applying the information from Arabidopsis to other species, especially crop plants.ConclusionsWe identified ten novel meiotically-active promoters; which, along with their homologs, are prime candidates to specifically drive gene expression during meiosis in plants and can thus provide important tools for meiosis study and crop breeding.

Maternally recruited Aurora C kinase is more stable than Aurora B to support mouse oocyte maturation and early development

Aurora kinases are highly conserved, essential regulators of cell division. Two Aurora kinase isoforms, A and B (AURKA and AURKB), are expressed ubiquitously in mammals, whereas a third isoform, Aurora C (AURKC), is largely restricted to germ cells. Because AURKC is very similar to AURKB, based on sequence and functional analyses, why germ cells express AURKC is unclear. We report that Aurkc(-/-) females are subfertile, and that AURKB function declines as development progresses based on increasing severity of cytokinesis failure and arrested embryonic development. Furthermore, we find that neither Aurkb nor Aurkc is expressed after the one-cell stage, and that AURKC is more stable during maturation than AURKB using fluorescently tagged reporter proteins. In addition, Aurkc mRNA is recruited during maturation. Because maturation occurs in the absence of transcription, posttranscriptional regulation of Aurkc mRNA, coupled with the greater stability of AURKC protein, provides a means to ensure sufficient Aurora kinase activity, despite loss of AURKB, to support both meiotic and early embryonic cell divisions. These findings suggest a model for the presence of AURKC in oocytes: that AURKC compensates for loss of AURKB through differences in both message recruitment and protein stability.

New Insights into the Troubles of Aneuploidy

Deviation from a balanced genome by either gain or loss of entire chromosomes is generally tolerated poorly in all eukaryotic systems studied to date. Errors in mitotic or meiotic cell division lead to aneuploidy, which places a burden of additional or insufficient gene products from the missegregated chromosomes on the daughter cells. The burden of aneuploidy often manifests itself as impaired fitness of individual cells and whole organisms, in which abnormal development is also characteristic. However, most human cancers, noted for their rapid growth, also display various levels of aneuploidy. Here we discuss the detrimental, potentially beneficial, and sometimes puzzling effects of aneuploidy on cellular and organismal fitness and tissue function as well as its role in diseases such as cancer and neurodegeneration.

Evolutionary insights into the role of the essential centromere protein CAL1 in Drosophila

Centromeres are essential cis-elements on chromosomes that are crucial for the stable transmission of genetic information during mitotic and meiotic cell divisions. Different species employ a variety of centromere configurations, from small genetically defined centromeres in budding yeast to holocentric centromeres that occupy entire chromosomes in Caenorhabditis, yet the incorporation of nucleosomes containing the essential centromere-specific histone H3 variant CENP-A is a common feature of centromeres in all eukaryotes. In vertebrates and fungi, CENP-A is specifically deposited at centromeres by a conserved chaperone, called HJURP or Scm3, respectively. Surprisingly, homologs of these proteins have not been identified in Drosophila, Caenorhabditis, or plants. How CENP-A is targeted to centromeres in these organisms is not known. The Drosophila centromeric protein CAL1, found only in the Diptera genus, is essential for CENP-A localization, is recruited to centromeres at a similar time as CENP-A, and interacts with CENP-A in both chromatin and pre-nucleosomal complexes, making it a strong candidate for a CENP-A chaperone in this lineage. Here, we discuss the conservation and evolution of this essential centromere factor and report the identification of a "Scm3-domain"-like region with similarity to the corresponding region of fungal Scm3 as well as a shared predicted alpha-helical structure. Given the lack of common ancestry between Scm3 and CAL1, we propose that an optimal CENP-A binding region was independently acquired by CAL1, which caused the loss of an ancestral Scm3 protein from the Diptera lineage.

Separation of DNA Replication from the Assembly of Break-Competent Meiotic Chromosomes

The meiotic cell division reduces the chromosome number from diploid to haploid to form gametes for sexual reproduction. Although much progress has been made in understanding meiotic recombination and the two meiotic divisions, the processes leading up to recombination, including the prolonged pre-meiotic S phase (meiS) and the assembly of meiotic chromosome axes, remain poorly defined. We have used genome-wide approaches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to measure the kinetics of pre-meiotic DNA replication and to investigate the interdependencies between replication and axis formation. We found that replication initiation was delayed for a large number of origins in meiS compared to mitosis and that meiotic cells were far more sensitive to replication inhibition, most likely due to the starvation conditions required for meiotic induction. Moreover, replication initiation was delayed even in the absence of chromosome axes, indicating replication timing is independent of the process of axis assembly. Finally, we found that cells were able to install axis components and initiate recombination on unreplicated DNA. Thus, although pre-meiotic DNA replication and meiotic chromosome axis formation occur concurrently, they are not strictly coupled. The functional separation of these processes reveals a modular method of building meiotic chromosomes and predicts that any crosstalk between these modules must occur through superimposed regulatory mechanisms.

Gcn5p-dependent acetylation induces degradation of the meiotic transcriptional repressor Ume6p

Ume6p represses early meiotic gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by recruiting the Rpd3p histone deacetylase and chromatin-remodeling proteins. Ume6p repression is relieved in a two-step destruction process mediated by the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) ubiquitin ligase. The first step induces partial Ume6p degradation when vegetative cells shift from glucose- to acetate-based medium. Complete proteolysis happens only upon meiotic entry. Here we demonstrate that the first step in Ume6p destruction is controlled by its acetylation and deacetylation by the Gcn5p acetyltransferase and Rpd3p, respectively. Ume6p acetylation occurs in medium lacking dextrose and results in a partial destruction of the repressor. Preventing acetylation delays Ume6p meiotic destruction and retards both the transient transcription program and execution of the meiotic nuclear divisions. Conversely, mimicking acetylation induces partial destruction of Ume6p in dextrose medium and accelerates meiotic degradation by the APC/C. These studies reveal a new mechanism by which acetyltransferase activity induces gene expression through targeted destruction of a transcriptional repressor. These findings also demonstrate an important role for nonhistone acetylation in the transition between mitotic and meiotic cell division.

Outer Space and Oocyte Developmental Competence

Outer Space and Oocyte Developmental Competence

MRG-1 is required for genomic integrity in Caenorhabditis elegans germ cells

During meiotic cell division, proper chromosome synapsis and accurate repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are required to maintain genomic integrity, loss of which leads to apoptosis or meiotic defects. The mechanisms underlying meiotic chromosome synapsis, DSB repair and apoptosis are not fully understood. Here, we report that the chromodomain-containing protein MRG-1 is an important factor for genomic integrity in meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Loss of mrg-1 function resulted in a significant increase in germ cell apoptosis that was partially inhibited by mutations affecting DNA damage checkpoint genes. Consistently, mrg-1 mutant germ lines exhibited SPO-11-generated DSBs and elevated exogenous DNA damage-induced chromosome fragmentation at diakinesis. In addition, the excessive apoptosis in mrg-1 mutants was partially suppressed by loss of the synapsis checkpoint gene pch-2, and a significant number of meiotic nuclei accumulated at the leptotene/zygotene stages with an elevated level of H3K9me2 on the chromatin, which was similarly observed in mutants deficient in the synaptonemal complex, suggesting that the proper progression of chromosome synapsis is likely impaired in the absence of mrg-1. Altogether, these findings suggest that MRG-1 is critical for genomic integrity by promoting meiotic DSB repair and synapsis progression in meiosis.

Centrosome dynamics during mammalian oocyte maturation with a focus on meiotic spindle formation

Oocyte maturation is an important process required to achieve optimal oocyte quality, and later affects fertilization potential and subsequent embryo development. The maturation process includes synchronized nuclear and cytoplasmic remodeling, in which cytoskeletal and centrosome dynamics play an important role and significantly participate in cellular signaling. Centrosome remodeling within the maturing oocyte is essential for accurate meioisis I and II spindle formation, specifically to separate chromosomes accurately during the two successive, highly asymmetric meiotic cell divisions. Centrosomal abnormalities result in inaccurate microtubule organization and inaccurate chromosome alignment, with failures in chromosome segregation leading to aneuploidy and chromosomal abnormalities. The present review is focused on cytoskeletal and centrosome remodeling during oocyte maturation, with specific attention to γ-tubulin, pericentrin, the Nuclear Mitotic Apparatus (NuMA) protein, and microtubule organization. Species-specific differences will be discussed for rodent (mouse) and non-rodent (bovine, porcine) species, and for human oocytes.

The maze of paramutation: a rough guide to the puzzling epigenetics of paramutation

Epigenetic mechanisms maintain gene expression states through mitotic and sometimes meiotic cell divisions. Paramutation is an extreme example of epigenetic processes. Not only an established expression state is transmitted through meiosis to the following generations but also an information transfer occurs between alleles and leads to heritable changes in expression state. As a consequence the expression states can rapidly propagate in population, violating Mendelian genetics. Recent findings unraveled an essential role for siRNA-dependent processes in paramutation. Despite significant progress, the overall picture is still puzzling and many important questions remain to be answered.

The effects of glutathione, insulin and oxidative stress on cultured spermatogenic cysts

Spermatogenesis is a series of cellular processes that leads to the development of motile, elongate sperm cells. Mitotic expansion of spermatogenic stem cells is followed by two meiotic cell divisions that yield haploid round spermatids which then transform from a spherical form into an elongate, highly polarized form. In Drosophila, spermatogenesis takes place within encapsulating cysts that contain spermatogenic cells. Spermatogenic cysts were isolated and grown in culture over the course of 96 hours. Cultures were treated with buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), glutathione (GSH), insulin and GSH+insulin in order to test the effects of these agents on cyst viability. The addition of glutathione and exogenous insulin to cultured spermatogenic cysts each appeared to have a positive effect on early spermatogenic cyst survival in vitro at some timepoints. The addition of GSH+insulin together had no significant effect on early spermatogenic cyst survival in vitro. Oxidative stress induced by BSO resulted in a significant decrease and/or complete loss of specific early spermatogenic cyst types and the abnormal development of elongating cysts in culture. This culture system offers the opportunity for high-resolution analysis of spermatogenic processes not previously possible.

Meiotic restitution in amphihaploids in the tribe Triticeae

In haploid and diploid organisms of the plant kingdom, meiotic division of diploid cells proceeds in two consecutive stages, with DNA replicating only once. In amphihaploids (interspecific or iontergeneric hybrids), where homologs are absent, the reduction of the chromosome number does not occur, meiosis is abnormal, and the plants are sterile. Gamete viability in F1 hybrids is ensured by a single division when chromosomes are separated into sister chromatids in either the first or the second division. Such gametes ensure partial fertility of amphihaploids, thereby facilitating their survival and stabilization of the polygenome. The frequency of the formation of viable gametes varies from a few cases to 98.8% in different anthers of the hybrids. Here, studies on the cytological mechanisms and genetic control of chromosome unreduction or restitution in different amphihaploids of the tribe Triticeae are reviewed. The current notions on the control of formation of restitution nuclei based on the principles of a prolonged metaphase I and different types of meiocytes. The main terms used for systematization of restitution mechanisms are first-division restitution (FDR), single-division meiosis (SDM), and unreductional meiotic cell division (UMCD). It has been assumed that archesporial cells of remote hybrids may have two cell division programs, the meiotic and the mitoyic ones. The possible approaches to the analysis of the genetic control of chromosome restitution in amphihaploids are discussed.

Advances in imaging reveal novel insights into the mechanisms promoting accurate chromosome segregation in mitosis and meiosis

The most important outcome of both mitotic and meiotic cell divisions is the accurate segregation of chromosomes. Failure to properly separate sister chromatids during mitosis as well as either homologues or sister chromatids during meiosis I and II, respectively, results in aneuploidy that contributes to tumorigenesis and causes miscarriages, infertility, and birth defects. Speakers at the Mitosis and Meiosis Minisymposium at the ASCB 2010 meeting highlighted new and exciting mechanisms that promote faithful chromosome segregation during these two cell division programs. Duane Compton (Dartmouth Medical School) started the mitosis section by describing recent work using fluorescence dissipation after photoactivation of green fluorescent protein–tagged tubulin to measure the dynamic attachment of microtubules to kinetochores (kMTs). His work showed that molecular changes in the composition of the outer kinetochore generate optimal kMT attachment dynamics during mitotic progression so that kMTs are stable enough to satisfy the spindle assembly checkpoint but not so stable that they prevent the correction of attachment errors. Alexey Khodjakov (Wadsworth Center) showed data using three-dimensional video microscopy that permits him to track the location of single sister kinetochore pairs relative to centrosomes with unprecedented temporal resolution. His work showed how chromosome movements and chromosome arm orientation relative to spindle poles work together to position chromosomes optimally for attachment of kinetochores to spindle microtubules within the brief time window in the early stages of mitosis. Andrew Powers (University of Washington), the recipient of the Norton B. Gilula Award, presented his work using laser trapping to measure the interaction of kinetochores with microtubules. He demonstrated that there is a direct relationship between the force applied to a microtubule and the lifetime that kinetochore complexes hold onto kMT ends, analogous to a Chinese finger trap. The first speaker in the meiosis section was Jennifer Fung (University of California, San Francisco). She described the development of live cell imaging techniques to measure the kinetics of the formation of the synaptonemal complex that assembles between homologous chromosomes during meiosis in most organisms from yeast to humans. Using high-resolution imaging, she showed that, in budding yeast, synapsis proceeds at a rate of ∼30 nm/min and is continuous, with the number of nucleation sites acting as a limiting factor in the speed of this process. Monica Colaiacovo (Harvard Medical School) addressed the poorly understood regulation of establishment and maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. By combining high-resolution imaging and genetic analyses, she demonstrated that LAB-1, a functional analog of Shugoshin, acts to localize cohesin members such as SMC-3 by antagonizing cohesin-destabilizing factors early in prophase, thereby promoting normal progression of chromosome pairing, synapsis, and recombination. Julien Dumont (Institut Curie, Paris) addressed the important question of how chromosomes segregate in the absence of astral microtubules in meiosis. His studies in the context of the C. elegans holocentric chromosomes revealed that microtubules form exclusively between separating chromosomes, suggesting an “inside-out” kinetochore-independent mechanism driving meiotic anaphase chromosome separation. In summary, a theme that emerged from these talks is that improvements in imaging modes and resolution (spatial and temporal) are revealing insights into the mechanisms that drive accurate chromosome segregation in mitosis and meiosis.

In vitro development of vitrified buffalo oocytes following parthenogenetic activation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection

The objective of this study was to investigate the potential of swamp buffalo oocytes vitrified-warmed at the metaphase of the second meiotic cell division (M-II) stage to develop to the blastocyst stage after parthenogenetic activation (PA) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). In Experiment 1, we examined the effects of exposure time of oocytes to cryoprotectants (CPA) on their in vitro development after PA. In vitro matured (IVM) oocytes were placed in 10% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) + 10% ethylene glycol (EG) for 1 min and then exposed to 20% DMSO + 20% EG + 0.5 M sucrose for 30 s, 45 s or 60 s (1 min + 30 s, 1 min + 45 s and 1 min + 60 s groups, respectively). The oocytes were then exposed to warming solution (TCM199 HEPES + 20% FBS and 0.5M sucrose) for 5 min and then washed in TCM199 HEPES + 20% FBS for 5 min. IVM oocytes without CPA treatments served as a control group. The viability assessed by fluorescein diacetate (FDA) staining was 100% in all groups. The developmental rates after PA to the blastocyst stage between 1min+30s (16%) and control (26%) groups did not differ significantly, but they were significantly higher than those in 1 min + 45 s (10%) and 1 min + 60 s (2%) groups. In Experiment 2, we examined the effect of two CPA exposure times, 1 min + 30 s and 1 min + 45 s on the in vitro development after PA of oocytes vitrified by the microdrop method. The viabilities in vitrified 1 min + 30 s, 1 min + 45 s and the control (without CPA treatments) groups were not different (97%, 95% and 100%, respectively). The development of surviving oocytes to the blastocyst stage in the vitrified 1 min + 30 s group (8%) was significantly higher than that in the vitrified 1 min + 45 s group (4%) and significantly lower than those in control group (26%). In Experiment 3, we examined the effect of two CPA exposure times, 1 min + 30 s and 1 min + 45 s on in vitro development after ICSI of vitrified oocytes. Viabilities in vitrified oocytes among 1 min + 30 s, 1 min + 45 s and control groups were not different (96%, 91% and 100%, respectively). After ICSI, vitrified-warmed oocytes were activated and oocytes with the second polar body were cultured for 7 days. The development of ICSI oocytes to the blastocyst stage in the vitrified 1 min + 30 s group (11%) was significantly higher than that in the vitrified 1 min + 45 s (7%) group and significantly lower than those in control group (23%). In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the 1 min + 30 s CPA treatment regimen could yield the highest blastocyst formation rates after PA and ICSI for oocytes vitrified by the microdrop method.

“Bouquet arrest”, monopolar chromosomes segregation, and correction of the abnormal spindle

According to our data, the arrest of univalents in bouquet arrangement is a widespread meiotic feature in cereal haploids and allohaploids (wide hybrids F(1)). We have analyzed 83 different genotypes of cereal haploids and allohaploids with visualization of the cytoskeleton and found a bouquet arrest in 45 of them (in 30% to 100% pollen mother cells (PMCs)). The meiotic plant cell division in 26 various genotypes with a zygotene bouquet arrest was analyzed in detail. In three of them in PMCs, a very specific monopolar conic-shaped figure at early prometaphase is formed. This monopolar figure consists of mono-oriented univalents and their kinetochore fibers converging in pointed pole. Such figures are never observed at wild-type prometaphase or in asynaptic meiosis in the variants without a bouquet arrest. Later at prometaphase, the bipolar central spindle fibers join in this monopolar figure, and a bipolar spindle with all univalents connected to one pole is formed. As a result of monopolar chromosome segregation at anaphase and normal cytokinesis at telophase, a dyad with one member carrying a restitution nucleus and the other enucleated is formed. However, such phenotype has only three genotypes among 26 analyzed with a bouquet arrest. In the remaining 23 haploids and allohaploids, the course of prometaphase was altered after the conic monopolar figure formation. In these variants, the completely formed conic monopolar figure was disintegrated into a chaotic network of spindle fibers and univalents acquired a random orientation. This arrangement looks like a mid-prometaphase in the wild-type meiosis. At late prometaphase, a bipolar spindle is formed with the univalents distributed more or less equally between two poles, similar to the phenotypes without a bouquet arrest. The product of cell division is a dyad with aneuploid members. Thus, the spindle abnormality-monopolar chromosome orientation-is corrected. In some cells the correction of the prometaphase monopolus occurs by means of its splitting into two half-spindles and their rotation along the future division axis.

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Histone H3 Modifications in Germ Cells during Mouse Spermatogenesis

Histone modification has been implicated in the regulation of mammalian spermatogenesis. However, the association of differently modified histone H3 with a specific stage of germ cells during spermatogenesis is not fully understood. In this study, we examined the localization of variously modified histone H3 in paraffin-embedded sections of adult mouse testis immunohistochemically, focusing on acetylation at lysine 9 (H3K9ac), lysine 18 (H3K18ac), and lysine 23 (H3K23ac); tri-methylation at lysine 4 (H3K4me3) and lysine 27 (H3K27me3); and phosphorylation at serine 10 (H3S10phos). As a result, we found that there was a significant fluctuation in the modifications; in spermatogonia, the stainings for H3K9ac, H3K18ac, and H3K23ac were strong while that for H3K4me3 was weak. In spermatocytes, the stainings for H3K9ac, H3K18ac, H3K23ac, and H3K4me3 were reduced in the preleptotene to pachytene stage, but in diplotene stage the stainings for H3K18ac, H3K23ac, and H3K4me3 seemed to become intense again. The staining for H3K27me3 was nearly constant throughout these stages. In the ensuing spermiogenesis, a dramatic acetylation and methylation of histone H3 was found in the early elongated spermatids and then almost all signals disappeared in the late elongated spermatids, in parallel with the replacement from histones to protamines. In addition, we confirmed that the staining of histone H3S10phos was exclusively associated with mitotic and meiotic cell division. Based upon the above results, we indicated that the modification pattern of histone H3 is subject to dynamic change and specific to a certain stage of germ cell differentiation during mouse spermatogenesis.

Heat Shock Transcription Factor 1 Localizes to Sex Chromatin during Meiotic Repression

Heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) is an important transcription factor in cellular stress responses, cancer, aging, and developmental processes including gametogenesis. Disruption of Hsf1, together with another HSF family member, Hsf2, causes male sterility and complete lack of mature sperm in mice, but the specific role of HSF1 in spermatogenesis has remained unclear. Here, we show that HSF1 is transiently expressed in meiotic spermatocytes and haploid round spermatids in mouse testis. The Hsf1−/− male mice displayed regions of seminiferous tubules containing only spermatogonia and increased morphological abnormalities in sperm heads. In search for HSF1 target genes, we identified 742 putative promoters in mouse testis. Among them, the sex chromosomal multicopy genes that are expressed in postmeiotic cells were occupied by HSF1. Given that the sex chromatin mostly is repressed during and after meiosis, it is remarkable that HSF1 directly regulates the transcription of sex-linked multicopy genes during postmeiotic repression. In addition, our results show that HSF1 localizes to the sex body prior to the meiotic divisions and to the sex chromocenter after completed meiosis. To the best of our knowledge, HSF1 is the first known transcription factor found at the repressed sex chromatin during meiosis.

Uracil in DNA—Its biological significance

Uracil may arise in DNA as a result of spontaneous cytosine deamination and/or misincorporation of dUMP during DNA replication. In this paper we will review: (i) sources of the origin of uracil in DNA; (ii) some properties of the enzymes responsible for the excision of uracil and their role in the Ig diversification process, which comprises somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination; and (iii) consequences of cytosine deamination in other than the Ig loci, in cell types different than B lymphocytes. Furthermore, the issue concerning the basal level of uracil in DNA and consequences of the presence of U:A pairs for DNA stability and cell functions will be discussed. Finally, we will discuss the clinical significance of aberrant uracil incorporation into DNA and possible involvement of aberrantly expressed AID and the enzyme-induced presence of uracil, in carcinogenesis. Based on the literature data we conclude/hypothesize that the non-canonical base uracil may be present and well tolerated in DNA mostly as U:A pairs, likely in quantities of 10(4) per genome. Although a role of uracil in DNA is not fully defined, it is possible that an ancestral system which once used uracil in primordial genetic material (uracil-DNA), may have evolved to use this molecule in regulatory processes such as: (i) meiotic cell division to facilitate chromatid exchange during crossing-over (in spermatocytes); (ii) it is possible that uracil present in DNA may be a signaling molecule during metamorphosis of Drosophila melanogaster; and (iii) during transcription since some regulatory proteins (Escherichia coli lac repressor) and GCN4 can recognize uracil versus thymine in specific DNA regulatory sequences. Moreover, recent data suggest that in transcriptionally active chromatin the dUTP/dTTP pool may be significantly increased, which in turn may lead to massive uracil incorporation into DNA.

Rediscovery of the nucleolinus, a dynamic RNA-rich organelle associated with the nucleolus, spindle, and centrosomes.

The nucleolinus is an RNA-rich compartment, closely apposed to or embedded within the nucleolus. Discovered over 150 y ago, fewer than two dozen articles have been published on the nucleolinus, probably because complex histochemical stains are required for its visualization in the great majority of cells. The nucleolinus has been reported in invertebrate oocytes, mammalian and amphibian epithelial cells, neurons, and several transformed cell lines. A prominent nucleolinus, clearly visible with transmitted light microscopes at 10x magnification, is present in each oocyte of the surf clam, Spisula solidissima. We observed a consistent relationship between the nucleolinus and the developing meiotic apparatus following Spisula oocyte activation. Through sonication and sucrose gradient fractionation of purified oocyte nuclei, we isolated nucleolini, extracted their RNA, and prepared an in situ riboprobe (NLi-1), which is associated specifically with the nucleolinus, confirming its unique composition. Other in situ observations revealed a NLi-1 and nucleolinar association with the developing spindle and centrosomes. Laser microsurgery that targeted the nucleolinus resulted in failed meiotic cell division in parthenogenetically activated oocytes and failed mitosis in fertilized oocytes. Although the nucleolinus may be a forgotten organelle, its demonstrated role in spindle formation suggests it deserves renewed attention.

Is the control of recombination conserved among diverse eukaryotes?

Is the control of recombination conserved among diverse eukaryotes?