Medium Cut-off Dialyzer Research Articles

Comparison of Hemodialysis Using a Medium Cutoff Dialyzer versus Hemodiafiltration: A Controlled Cross-Over Study.

PurposeConventional hemodialysis (HD) treatment has an acceptable removal of small uremic molecules, but so-called “middle molecules” in the range of 0.5–60 kDa are poorly cleared with HD compared to a native kidney, which may contribute to morbidity in the dialysis population. Hemodiafiltration (HDF) has a better removal of middle molecules compared to HD but is technically demanding and requires well-functioning dialysis access. The newly introduced medium cutoff (MCO) filters have been developed to enhance middle molecule clearance in HD-mode. The aim of this study was to compare reduction ratios (RRs) of molecules with different molecular weights (0.06–150 kDa) during dialysis with MCO dialyzer (used in HD-mode) compared to online-hemodiafiltration (ol-HDF) treatment with a conventional high-flux dialyzer.Patients and MethodsThis is a prospective controlled single-center cross-over study, including 16 patients in Malmö, Sweden. All patients had ongoing post-dilution ol-HDF treatment before the study. The study compared reduction ratios of small-, middle-, and large-sized molecules during a single 4h dialysis treatment with post-dilution ol-HDF (Polyflux 210H) to a 4h dialysis treatment with MCO dialyzer (Theranova 500) in HD-mode. Between treatments, the patients had a washout period of at least two weeks of their ordinary HDF treatment to reach their ordinary steady state.Resultsol-HDF had significantly higher RR for cystatin C (13 kDa), compared to MCO (RR 68.1 vs 65.8, p=0.003), during a 4h dialysis treatment (mean convection volume of 24.5 L for HDF, and mean Qb of 324 mL/min for HDF and 323 mL/min for MCO). There was no significant difference in the RR for other middle molecules, or for smaller or larger molecules.ConclusionOverall, the RRs were comparable for ol-HDF and MCO-HD. There was a slightly higher RR of cystatin C (a small middle molecule) for HDF compared to MCO but no difference in other measured molecules.

Effect of Hemodiafiltration with Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer on Uremic Toxins Removal

Effect of Hemodiafiltration with Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer on Uremic Toxins Removal

Tryptophan Removal in ESRD Patients Treated with High-Flux and Medium Cut-Off Dialyzers During Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration

Tryptophan Removal in ESRD Patients Treated with High-Flux and Medium Cut-Off Dialyzers During Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration

Medium cut-off dialyzer improves erythropoiesis stimulating agent resistance in a hepcidin-independent manner in maintenance hemodialysis patients: results from a randomized controlled trial

The response to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) is affected by inflammation linked to middle molecules in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We evaluated the effect of a medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzer on ESA resistance in maintenance HD patients. Forty-nine patients who underwent high-flux HD were randomly allocated to the MCO or high-flux group. The primary outcome was the changes of erythropoietin resistance index (ERI; U/kg/wk/g/dL) between baseline and 12 weeks. The MCO group showed significant decrease in the ESA dose, weight-adjusted ESA dose, and ERI compared to the high-flux group at 12 weeks (p < 0.05). The generalized estimating equation models revealed significant interactions between groups and time for the ESA dose, weight-adjusted ESA dose, and ERI (p < 0.05). Serum iron and transferrin saturation were higher in the MCO group at 12 weeks (p < 0.05). The MCO group showed a greater reduction in TNF-α and lower serum TNF-α level at 12 weeks compared to the high-flux group (p < 0.05), whereas no differences were found in the reduction ratio of hepcidin and serum levels of erythropoietin, erythroferrone, soluble transferrin receptor and hepcidin between groups. HD with MCO dialyzer improves ESA resistance over time compared to high-flux HD in maintenance HD patients. The MCO dialyzer provides superior removal of the inflammatory cytokine and thus improves iron metabolism in a hepcidin-independent manner.

Efficacy and Safety of Expanded Hemodialysis with the Theranova 400 Dialyzer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Expanded hemodialysis therapy enabled by medium cut-off membranes may promote greater clearance of larger middle molecules that comprise putative uremic solutes than conventional high-flux dialysis. This randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of hemodialysis treatment with a medium cut-off dialyzer. Clinically stable patients on maintenance hemodialysis were randomized to receive dialysis with either a medium cut-off dialyzer (Theranova 400) or a high-flux dialyzer (Elisio-17H) over 24 weeks of treatment. The primary safety end point was the predialysis serum albumin level after 24 weeks of treatment. The primary efficacy end point was the reduction ratio of free λ light chains at 24 weeks of treatment. Among 172 patients on maintenance hemodialysis, mean age was 59±13 years, 61% were men, 40% were Black, and mean dialysis vintage was 5±4 years. Of the 86 patients randomized to each dialyzer, 65 completed the trial in each group. The reduction ratio for the removal of free λ light chains was significantly higher in the Theranova 400 group compared with the Elisio-17H group after 4 weeks (39% versus 20%) and 24 weeks (33% versus 17%; both P<0.001). Among secondary end points, the Theranova 400 group demonstrated significantly larger reduction ratios at 4 and 24 weeks for complement factor D, free κ light chains, TNFα, and β2-microglobulin (P<0.001 for all), but not for IL-6. Predialysis serum albumin levels were similar between groups after 24 weeks (4 g/dl with the Theranova 400 and 4.1 g/dl with the Elisio-17H), consistent with noninferiority of the Theranova 400 dialyzer in maintaining predialysis serum albumin levels after 24 weeks of treatment. Hemodialysis therapy with the Theranova 400 dialyzer provides superior removal of larger middle molecules, as exemplified by free λ light chains, compared with a similar size high-flux dialyzer, while maintaining serum albumin level. A Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Parallel Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Theranova 400 Dialyzer in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Patients, NCT03257410.

Comparison of Circulating Levels of Uremic Toxins in Hemodialysis Patients Treated with Medium Cut-Off Membranes and High-Flux Membranes: Theranova in Sisli Hamidiye Etfal (THE SHE) Randomized Control Study

Introduction: Removal of uremic toxins is a main objective of hemodialysis; however, whether high-flux and medium cut-off (MCO) membranes differ as regards removal of middle and large uremic toxins is not clear. Objective: To compare medium cut-off and high-flux dialyzers as regards their intra- and interdialysis effect on circulating levels of middle and large uremic toxins and serum albumin. Methods: Fifty-two patients were randomized to have hemodialysis with either 3 months of high-flux dialyzer followed by 3 months of MCO or vice versa. Blood samples were taken before and after dialysis at the first and last sessions of each dialyzer for analyses of middle and large uremic toxins including inflammatory mediators and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and serum albumin. Results: Reduction rates were higher, and postdialysis levels of β-2 microglobulin, free kappa and lambda light chains, and myoglobulin were lower at the first and last sessions with MCO dialyzers compared to high-flux dialyzers (p < 0.05 for all). Last session predialysis levels of β-2 microglobulin, free kappa light chain, and free lambda light chain were lower than first session predialysis levels in MCO dialyzers as compared to high-flux dialyzers (p < 0.05 for all). Last session levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-10, interleukin-17, and interferon-gamma did not differ between dialyzers (p > 0.05 for all). VEGF level was lower in the MCO group compared to the high-flux group (p = 0.043). Last session level of serum albumin with MCO dialyzers was lower than that with high-flux dialyzers (3.62 [3.45–3.88] vs. 3.78 [3.58–4.02] g/L) (p = 0.04) and 6.7% lower (p < 0.001) than at the first session of MCO dialyzers. Conclusion: The decline in circulating levels of several middle and large uremic toxins including VEGF following hemodialysis was more pronounced when using MCO membranes as compared to high-flux membranes while their effect on inflammatory molecules was similar.

P1078IMPACT OF A MEDIUM CUT-OFF DIALYZER ON SKIN AUTOFLUORESCENCE IN HAEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

Abstract Background and Aims Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) are middle-sized uraemic toxins that accumulate in haemodialysis (HD) patients due to increased production, impaired excretion and insufficient removal. Previous studies have reported that the use of a medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzer promotes a greater removal of larger middle molecules (such as AGEs) than conventional high-flux HD and haemodiafiltration. However, to our knowledge, there is no published evidence regarding the effect of an MCO dialyzer on skin autofluorescence (SAF), a measure of long-term tissue AGE accumulation and independent risk factor for mortality in the HD population. We aimed to investigate the impact of using an MCO dialyzer on change in SAF over time in HD patients. Method HD patients were enrolled in a prospective observational study. SAF was measured using a validated Autofluorescence Reader at baseline, 12 and 24 months. During the initial 12 months patients dialysed using high-flux polysulphone, polyarylethersulfone or polyvinylpyrrolidone dialyzers. At a variable time after 12 months patients were switched to an MCO dialyzer (Theranova; Baxter®). Forty patients who had been using the MCO dialyzer for at least 3 months were included in this analysis. Results Mean age, baseline SAF levels and time on MCO dialyzer were 63±13 years, 3.5±0.9 arbitrary units (AU) and 124±49 days, respectively. SAF increased significantly from baseline to 12 months (3.5±0.9 vs. 3.9±1.1 AU; p&amp;lt;0.0001) but tended to decrease between 12 and 24 months, after conversion to an MCO dialyzer (3.9±1.1 vs. 3.7±0.7 AU; p=0.06). Additionally, mean ΔSAF from baseline to 12 months was positive (0.41±0.68 AU) whereas ΔSAF from 12 to 24 months was negative (-0.18±0.76 AU; p=0.002 for comparison). Furthermore, SAF at 24 months correlated negatively and significantly with time on MCO dialyzer (r= -0.384; p=0.01) though second year ΔSAF (delta from 12 to 24 months) did not (r= 0.061; p=0.7). Conclusion We found in this observational study that SAF levels decreased/stabilised in HD patients after switching to an MCO dialyzer compared to the time when patients were using conventional high-flux HD and haemodiafiltration, during which SAF levels increased. Future prospective and interventional studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings and to evaluate the impact of using an MCO dialyzer on long-term outcomes, including survival.

P1072COMPARISON OF UREMIC TOXINS, INFLAMMATORY MARKERS AND VEGF LEVEL WITH MEDIUM CUT-OFF MEMBRANES AND HIGH-FLUX MEMBRANES IN HEMODIALYSIS: THERANOVA IN SISLI HAMIDIYE ETFAL (THE SHE) STUDY

Abstract Background and Aims Mortality in hemodialysis have not changed since last 30 years which may be caused by inflammation and accumulation of middle and large uremic toxins. Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes are able to perform hemodialysis as effective as hemodiafiltration. Their effect on inflammatory molecules and vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF), an independent factor effective on mortality, are not well known. The aim of the study was to compare intra and inter dialyzer performances of MCO and high-flux dialyzers regarding middle and large uremic toxin, inflammatory marker, VEGF and serum albumin level. Method This is a randomized, prospective, open-label, cross-over study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03836508) approved by local ethic committee. Patients had hemodialysis with either 36 sessions of high-flux dialyzer followed by 36 sessions of medium cut-off dialyzer or vice versa. Pre and postdialysis levels for urea, creatinine, albumin, total protein, free kappa light chain, free lambda light chain, beta-2 microglobulin, myoglobulin levels were determined at first and last sessions of every dialyzer. Postdialysis level of middle and large uremic molecules have been determined by a formula to prevent hemoconcentration effect. Reduction rate for uremic toxins were calculated. Serum level of human VEGF, fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), interferon gamma (IFN-g), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-17A (IL-17A) levels were determined at first and last session of the each dialyzer. Results Fifty-two patients were enrolled to the study. Median age of patients was 56.40 (43.87-67.39) years. Median dialysis vintage was 4.77 (3.08-10.09) years. Reduction rates and postdialysis levels of free kappa and lambda light chain, myoglobulin, beta-2 microglobulin were lower both at first and last sessions in medium cut-off dialyzers compared to high-flux dialyzers (p&amp;lt;0.05 for all) (Table 1). Last session predialysis free kappa, free lambda, beta-2 microglobulin level was lower than first session predialysis levels in medium cut-off dialyzers (p&amp;lt;0.05 for all) (Table 2). Last session IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, IFN-gamma levels did not differ between dialyzers (p&amp;gt;0.05 for all). Vascular endothelial growth factor levels were 500.91 (363.80-679.15) pg/ml in medium cut-off group and 610.60 (450.63-1021.93) pg/ml in high-flux group (p=0,043). Predialysis serum albumin level at first session for MCO and high-flux groups were 3.88 (3.71-4.04) g/L and 3.75 (3.59-3.95) g/L, respectively (p=0.086) (Figure 1). After 3 months of hemodialysis, it was 3.62 (3.45-3.88) g/L in MCO group and 3.78 (3.58-4.02) g/L in high-flux group (p=0.04). Serum albumin level has decreased from 3.88 (3.71-4.04) g/L to 3.62 (3.45-3.88) g/L in 3 months during hemodialysis with MCO dialyzers (p=0.0001). It did not change significantly in high-flux group in the same time period (p=0.861). Conclusion MCO membranes not only decrease post dialysis levels of free kappa, free lambda, beta-2 microglobulin, myoglobulin but also decrease the third month predialysis levels of free kappa, free lambda, beta-2 microglobulin. They do not let the increase in myoglobulin level as seen in high-flux dialyzers. Even though the IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, IFN-gamma, FGF-23 levels did not differ, VEGF levels were lower in MCO dialyzer. The most important side effect of hemodialysis with MCO membranes is decreased serum albumin level.

TO012HOW DIFFERENT IS THE CLEARANCE OF LARGE MIDDLE MOLECULES AND INFLAMMATORY MARKERS FROM EXPANDED HEMODIALYSIS THERAPY COMPARED TO ONLINE HEMODIAFILTRATION?

Abstract Background and Aims Expanded hemodialysis (HDx) with a medium cut-off dialyzer, Theranova® 500, can achieve a middle molecule clearance but its efficacy or comparison with HDF is still unknown. It is still unknown on how large middle molecules and inflammation markers are affected over time with a medium cut-off dialyzer. This study compared the purifying effectiveness of Theranova® 500 dialyzer with respect to online Hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). Method Sixty-three patients who were already receiving HDF were evaluated and 43 were randomized by residual renal function. Twenty-one patients received treatment with HDx using Theranova® 500 and 22 patients remained in HDF in post-dilution mode, using a high-flux dialyzer, Polyflux® 170H, for up to 24 weeks. The dialysis time and the adequacy parameters for both arms were the same. Large middle molecules were measured (kappa immunoglobulin free light chains [κ-FLC], lambda immunoglobulin free light chains [λ-FLC], chitinase-3-like protein 1 [YKL-40], fibroblast growth factor 23 [FGF-23] and serum beta-2 microglobulin [β2M]), ; and inflammatory markers (high sensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP], pentraxin - 3 [PTX-3], interleukin-6 [IL-6], interleukin-10 [IL-10]) at 12 weeks of treatment; and its change from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 in mid-week pre-dialysis. The method of measurement was the immunoassay. Siemens immunoassay was used for FLCs. Results HDx with Theranova® 500 demonstrated comparable results to OL-HDF with convective volume 24.4±3.2 L in terms of reduction rate (RR) of middle molecules (κ-FLC, λ-FLC, FGF-23 and β2M) at 12 weeks of treatment. HDx demonstrated similar performance to HDF in mid-week pre-dialysis plasma levels of middle molecules from baseline, at 12 and 24 weeks of treatment. Greater RR of YKL-40 at 12 weeks of treatment was seen in HDx group when compared to HDF (58.1% vs 42.4%; p≤0.0001), and there was a difference in the pre-dialysis β2M change from Baseline values between the groups (-0.60 for HDx arm and +3.28 for HDF arm, p=0.46). HDx with Theranova® 500 demonstrated comparable results to HDF in terms of reduction rate (RR) of inflammatory markers (hs-CRP, PTX-3, IL-6 and IL-10) at 12 weeks of treatment. There were no differences in the parameters of adequacy of dialysis between both arms. Both treatments were effective in maintaining pre-dialysis albumin and fibrinogen levels throughout the study. There were no significant adverse events related to the safety of Theranova. Conclusion HDx with Theranova® 500 is an emergent, effective and safe hemodialysis therapy that showed a purifying efficacy at least comparable to OL-HDF.

P1063PERFORMANCE OF MEDIUM CUT-OFF DIALYZERS IN EXPANDED HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS IN COLOMBIA

Abstract Background and Aims Uremic toxins which are retained in ESRD include small solutes to large middle molecules. Large middle molecules play significant roles in immune modulation and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Expanded hemodialysis (HDx) enabled by innovative medium cut-off (MCO) membrane more effectively removes large uremic toxins vs current dialytic therapies. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of MCO dialyzer in large middle molecules removal and pre-dialysis albumin levels after 24 weeks of treatment. Method This was an exploratory, prospective observational, multicenter cohort study. Prevalent patients on HD therapy for at least 90 days at the Renal Care Services (RCS) were included between June 6, 2018, to June 14, 2018. Uremic toxins removal was evaluated by measuring the reduction ratio (RR) of free light chains (FLC) κ, λ, Interleukin (IL) 6, IL-10, β2 Microglobulin (β2 M) and fibroblastic factor 23 (FGF-23) at 12 weeks ( w) of treatment, as well as the change in predialysis midweek serum level of β2M, FGF-23, factor XIV activity, and VII at baseline, 12 w and 24 w of treatment. A mixed-model repeated measures analysis (MMRM) was performed to identify statistical differences over time Results The RR of κ-FLC, λ-FLC, β2 M, and FGF-23 at week 12 showed a reduction between 46-72%; while in IL-6 RR was not significantly changed (Table 2). Predialysis serum levels decreased for β2m, FLCs and IL-6 and FGF 23 (Table 3). The decrease in albumin was within 5% from baseline. Twenty-two adverse events (AEs) occurred during the follow-up period; No AEs during HDx were deemed related to MCO membrane use. Conclusion MCO dialyzers are safe and effective in removing large MMs and decrease in the uremic toxins levels.

Randomized controlled trial of medium cut-off versus high-flux dialyzers on quality of life outcomes in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzers help remove larger middle molecules associated with symptoms related to the accumulation of uremic retention solutes. We investigated the effect of an MCO dialyzer on the improvement of quality of life (QOL) in maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients. Forty-nine HD patients with high-flux dialysis were randomly assigned to either an MCO (Theranova 400, Baxter) or a high-flux (FX CorDiax 80 or 60, Fresenius Medical Care) dialyzer and completed the study. QOL was assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form-36, and pruritus was assessed using a questionnaire and visual analog scale. The reduction ratios of middle molecules were also evaluated. Laboratory markers, including serum albumin, did not differ between the two groups after 12 weeks. Removals of kappa and lambda free light chains were greater for MCO dialyzer than high-flux dialyzer. The MCO group had higher scores than the high-flux group in the domains of physical functioning and physical role (75.2 ± 20.8 vs. 59.8 ± 30.1, P = 0.042; 61.5 ± 37.6 vs. 39.0 ± 39.6, P = 0.047, respectively), and the MCO group had lower mean scores for morning pruritus distribution and the frequency of scratching during sleep (1.29 ± 0.46 vs. 1.64 ± 0.64, P = 0.034; 0.25 ± 0.53 vs. 1.00 ± 1.47, P = 0.023, respectively). MCO dialyzers may improve patient-reported outcomes, particularly the physical components of QOL and uremic pruritus, in patients with high-flux dialyzers.

Combination of Medium Cut-off Dialyzer Membrane and Diet Modification to Alleviate Residual Uremic Syndrome of Dialysis Patients

Combination of Medium Cut-off Dialyzer Membrane and Diet Modification to Alleviate Residual Uremic Syndrome of Dialysis Patients

Preventive strategies and renal replacement therapies for patients with COVID-19

The current pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spotlighted the vulnerability of patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) to the viral infection, A baseline hyperinflammatory state driven by factors such as the retention of uremic toxins afflicts these patients. Emphasis is placed on preparedness and prevention strategies for infection with this new COVID-19 Virus. Extracorporeal techniques can be helpful in the modulation of an immune dysregulated response, both in the severely ill and in the chronic HD patient. The use of high-flux (HF) dialyzers for HD is the standard of care. However, with HF membranes the effect is augmented when applied in a Hemodiafiltration mode, thanks for its dragging effect, on the other hand the use of superflux or Medium cut off dialyzers MCO are advantageous in removing the larger middle molecules with special respect to the cytokines release as a main cause of deterioration in those patients the use of more prolonged Hemodialysis, namely Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) as well the Prolonged Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy (PIRRT) are considered best options as per its more prolongated time so compensate for the balance between production and elimination. Important issues are to improve the overall patients conditions on Maintenance Hemodialysis (MHD) in the term of maximizing the HD Dose, Nutritional support, treatment of any comorbidity as well inflammation as first step in preparedness of patients beside the strict and extensively adherent to preventive strategies that may improve the overall outcomes if they get infected with COVID-19.

Long-term effect of medium cut-off dialyzer on middle uremic toxins and cell-free hemoglobin.

The medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzer has shown good clearance of large middle molecules, but its long-term effects are unclear. We investigated whether MCO hemodialysis (HD) over one year could reduce middle molecule levels and cell-free hemoglobin (CFH), without albumin loss. A prospective cohort study in 57 hemodialysis patients was conducted. The patients were assigned to the MCO dialyzer group or the high-flux dialyzer group, according to the HD machine they used. The reduction ratio (RR) and one-year changes in small and middle molecules and CFH were analyzed. Over a 12-month follow-up, MCO HD did not reduce the serum levels of middle molecules (lambda free light chain [FLC], from 135.7 ± 39.9 to 132.0 ± 39.1 mg/L; kappa FLC, from 168.2 ± 58.5 to 167.7 ± 65.8 mg/L; β2-microglobulin, from 25.6 ± 9.6 to 28.4 ± 4.8 mg/L) or albumin (from 3.96 ± 0.31 to 3.94 ± 0.37 g/dL). MCO HD provided excellent RR of lambda FLC (49.3 ± 10.3%), kappa FLC (69.6 ± 10.4%) and β2-microglobulin (80.9 ± 7.3%), compared to high-flux HD. CFH was also removed well during an MCO HD session (RR of CPH, 85.5 [78.7–97.3] %), but long-term change was not significant (from 57.8 [46.2–79.1] to 62.0 [54.6–116.7] mg/L). The MCO dialyzer can be used effectively and safely in conventional HD settings, but long-term effects on large middle molecules and CFH were not significant. Further studies are needed to verify clinical benefits of the MCO dialyzer.

High-permeability alternatives to current dialyzers performing both high-flux hemodialysis and postdilution online hemodiafiltration.

Most high-flux dialyzers can be used in both hemodialysis (HD) and online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). However, some of these dialyzers have higher permeability and should not be prescribed for OL-HDF to avoid high albumin losses. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of a currently used dialyzer in HD and OL-HDF with those of several other high permeability dialyzers which should only be used in HD. A prospective, single-center study was carried out in 21 patients. Each patient underwent 5 dialysis sessions with routine dialysis parameters: 2 sessions with Helixone (HD and postdilution OL-HDF) and 1 session each with steam sterilized polyphenylene, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzers in HD treatment. The removal ratios (RR) of urea, creatinine, ß2 -microglobulin, myoglobin, prolactin, α1 -microglobulin, α1 -acid glycoprotein, and albumin were compared intraindividually. A proportional part of the dialysate was collected to quantify the loss of various solutes, including albumin. Urea and creatinine RRs with the Helixone-HDF and MCO dialyzers were higher than with the other 3 dialyzers in HD. The β2 -microglobulin, myoglobin and prolactin RRs with Helixone-HDF treatment were significantly higher than those obtained with all 4 dialyzers in HD treatment. The β2 -microglobulin value obtained with the MCO dialyzer was also higher than that obtained with the other 3 dialyzers in HD treatment. The myoglobin RR with MCO was higher than those obtained with Helixone and PMMA in HD treatment. The prolactin RR with Helixone-HD was significantly lower than those obtained in the other 4 study sessions. The α1 -microglobulin and α1 - acid glycoprotein RRs with Helixone-HDF were significantly higher than those obtained with Helixone and PMMA in HD treatment. The albumin loss varied from 0.54 g with Helixone-HD to 3.3 g with polyphenylene. The global removal score values ((UreaRR + β2 -microglobulinRR + myoglobinRR + prolactinRR + α1 -microglobulinRR + α1 -acid glycoproteinRR - albuminRR )/6) were 43.7% with Helixone-HD, 47.7% with PMMA, 54% with polyphenylene, 54.8% with MCO and 59.6% with Helixone-HDF, with significant differences. In conclusion, this study confirms the superiority of OL-HDF over HD with the high-flux dialyzers that allow both treatments. Although new dialyzers with high permeability can only be used in HD, they are in an intermediate position and some are very close to OL-HDF.

FP528Comparison of the removal of uremic toxins with medium cut-off and high-flux dialyzers: a randomized clinical trial

FP528Comparison of the removal of uremic toxins with medium cut-off and high-flux dialyzers: a randomized clinical trial

Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer versus Eight Hemodiafiltration Dialyzers: Comparison Using a Global Removal Score

Background: A novel class of membranes, medium cut-off (MCO) membranes, has recently been designed to achieve interesting removal capacities for middle and large middle molecules in hemodialysis (HD) treatments. The few studies published to date have reported contradictory results regarding middle-sized molecules when comparing MCO dialyzers versus dialyzers used in online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). Methods: A prospective, single-center study was carried out in 22 patients. Each patient underwent 9 dialysis sessions with routine dialysis parameters, one with an MCO dialyzer in HD and the other 8 with different dialyzers in OL-HDF. The removal ratio (RR) of urea, creatinine, β₂-microglobulin, myoglobin, prolactin, α₁-microglobulin, α₁-acid glycoprotein, and albumin was intraindividually compared. Albumin loss in dialysate was measured. We propose a global removal score ([urea_RR + β₂-microglobulin_RR + myoglobin_RR + prolactin_RR + α₁-microglobulin_RR + α₁-acid glycoprotein_RR]/6 – albumin_RR) as a new tool for measuring dialyzer effectiveness. Results: No significant differences in the RRs of small and middle molecular range molecules were observed between the MCO vs. OL-HDF dialyzers (range 60–80%). Lower RRs were found for α₁-microglobulin and α₁-acid glycoprotein without significant differences. The albumin RR was < 11% and dialysate albumin loss was < 3.5 g in all situations without significant differences. The global removal score was 54.9 ± 4.8% with the MCO dialyzer without significant differences. Conclusions: Removal of a wide range of molecular weights, calculated with the proposed global removal score, was almost equal with the MCO dialyzer in HD treatment compared with 8 high-flux dialyzers in high-volume OL-HDF without relevant changes in albumin loss. The global removal score could be a new tool to evaluate the effectiveness of dialyzers and/or different treatment modalities.

Effect of a Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer - Medical Device on ESA Resistance in 110 Hemodialysis Patients (EXPAND)

Effect of a Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer - Medical Device on ESA Resistance in 110 Hemodialysis Patients (EXPAND)

Intradialytic kinetics of middle molecules during hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration.

The kinetics of β2-microglobulin during hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration is well described by a two-compartment model where clearance by the dialyzer is from a central compartment volume that approximates plasma volume and a total distribution volume that approximates extracellular fluid volume. The kinetics of middle molecules with molecular weights larger than β2-microglobulin have not been extensively studied. Intradialytic plasma concentrations and overall dialyzer clearances of β2-microglobulin (11.8 kD), myoglobin (16.7 kD) and complement factor D (24.4 kD) were used to estimate three kinetic parameters from a two-compartment model, namely intercompartmental clearance, central compartment volume and total distribution volume, in hemodialysis patients; these data were collected during two clinical trials of medium cut-off dialyzers (with extended middle molecule removal) during hemodialysis and high-flux dialyzers during hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration. In the current exploratory analyses, the kinetic parameters from all dialyzers were combined. Overall dialyzer clearance was evaluated by total mass removed in the dialysate. In total, 345 sets of kinetic parameters from 35 patients were determined. Intercompartmental clearance and central compartment volume for myoglobin and complement factor D were smaller (P < 0.001) than those for β2-microglobulin. Independent of middle molecule, intercompartmental clearance and central compartment volume were associated with overall dialyzer clearance (P < 0.001), but total distribution volume was not (P = 0.083). A two-compartment kinetic model can only describe intradialytic kinetics of middle molecules with molecular weights larger than β2-microglobulin if the central compartment is small and dependent on overall dialyzer clearance.

Large uremic toxins: an unsolved problem in end-stage kidney disease.

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on maintenance hemodialysis are subject to a high burden of inflammation and cardiovascular disease, driven at least in part by retention of uremic solutes. Existing dialysis technologies using high-flux membranes offer limited clearance of solutes >15 kDa. New approaches to improve the removal of large uremic toxins include the novel medium cut-off dialysis membranes with pores larger than those in high-flux membranes. These new membranes provide the potential to improve the clearance of large middle molecules up to 50 kDa. In this review, we discuss 18 uremic toxins with molecular weights between 15 and 60 kDa that are retained in ESKD, for which there is evidence of a link to inflammation and/or cardiovascular disease. These include inflammatory proteins, cytokines, adipokines and other signaling proteins. Improved clearance of this group of difficult to remove molecules has the potential to lead to improved outcomes in dialysis patients by reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease, which now needs to be assessed in robust clinical trials.