Imago Mortis Bridget Whearty Mediating Images of Death in Late Medieval Culture. Ashby Kinch. Leiden: Brill, 2013. <http://www.brill.com/imago-mortis> One of the joys of being a medievalist today is the exploding growth of digital access. It seems that every month a new library or museum announces an ambitious digitization program. In the face of this glut of availability, there is a pressing need for smart studies engaging deeply with medieval images. Ashby Kinch’s Imago Mortis: Mediating Image of Death in Late Medieval Book Culture is one such study. Imago Mortis is an ambitious book, exploring cross-pollinations between didactic and literary works, manuscript illumination, wall paintings, cadaver tombs, late medieval religious traditions on the commemoration of the dead, and local and international political maneuvering in England and English-occupied Paris during the 1420s and 30s. Through these nodes, Kinch traces how visual and verbal artists draw on, adapt, and transform each other’s traditions in ways that are sometimes complementary, sometimes competitive, and nearly always in the service of making death more palatable to their powerful patrons. It would have been significantly easier to study one or two of these topics more deeply and in isolation, but it is in teasing out this vast network that Imago Mortis does its most valuable work. As Kinch puts it, “attending closely to the creative re-interpretation of both conventional and novel images of death in the medieval period opens up important dialogues: between literary and visual forms; between artists and the patrons for whom they produced their work; between the political and religious institutions that competed for the psychological and social energies of the late medieval individual; and between ourselves and the past” (276). In Chapter One, “Affirmative Visions of Dying in Illustrations of Henry Suso’s ‘De Scientia,’” Kinch shows how three manuscripts pair Suso’s vision of the lonely bad death with illustrations showing a good end surrounded by community. For the visual artists illuminating these manuscripts, Moriens, the dying one, is supported in death by the same institutions that supported him in life: a good friend (in Bayerische Staatsbibliothek Munchen Cod. gall. 28), a loving family (in Brussels, Bibliothèque Royale, MS IV. III), and an attending cleric (in London, British Library, Additional MS 37049). Rather than dismissing these craftsmen as bad readers of the texts they illustrate, Kinch reads disagreements between Suso’s text and accompanying illustrations as visual [End Page 301] artists’ thoughtful critiques and deliberate transformation of the textual tradition they accompany. Chapter Two, “Verbo-Visual Mirrors of Mortality in Thomas Hoccleve’s ‘Lerne for to Die’” turns to the only extant Middle English verse translation of Suso’s “De Scientia.” Although it begins by analyzing a deathbed illustration in Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Selden Supra 53, this chapter is not really concerned with connecting Hoccleve’s poem with a specific death culture, visual arts tradition. Instead, it traces how Hoccleve’s verse aestheticizes Suso’s Latin prose, arguing that this highly wrought poetic form serves as a tool for self-promotion, highlighting the English writer and his virtuosity. The chapter concludes by suggesting that Hoccleve differentiates himself from Chaucer through his preoccupation with death and loneliness, Kinch argues that Hoccleve depicts Chaucer as the poet who transcends death, but that he portrays himself as a poet who faces death, thus creating a space for himself outside of Chaucer’s shadow as well as outside the reach of meddling friends and worldly ambition. The intimate links between worldly ambition and patronage are a central topic of Chapter Three, “Commemorating Power in the Legend of the Three Living and the Three Dead,” which analyzes luxury images of the Three Living and the Three Dead. Here Kinch reveals how aristocrats co-opt an art form that began as clerical critique of aristocratic power. Through patronage of exquisite books and monuments, aristocrats turned this satire of their class’s failings to their advantage. The leveling power of death turns out to be something of a lie when patronage is taken into account. All men must die, but the wealthy can purchase rich memorials that ensure the survival of their names and memories, urging those...