Medication Use In Older Adults Research Articles

Do EMS Providers Accurately Ascertain Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Use in Older Adults with Head Trauma?

ABSTRACTObjective: Prehospital provider assessment of the use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications in older adults with head trauma is important. These patients are at increased risk for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and therefore field triage guidelines recommend transporting these patients to centers capable of rapid evaluation and treatment. Our objective was to evaluate EMS ascertainment of anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication use in older adults with head trauma. Methods: A retrospective study of older adults with head trauma was conducted throughout Sacramento County. All 5 transporting EMS agencies and all 11 hospitals in the county were included in the study, which ran from January 2012 to December 2012. Patients ≥55 years who were transported to a hospital by EMS after head trauma were included. We excluded patients transferred between two facilities, patients with penetrating head trauma, prisoners, and patients with unmatched hospital data. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet use were categorized as: warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC; dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban), aspirin, and other antiplatelet agents (e.g., clopidogrel and ticagrelor). We calculated the percent agreement and kappa statistic for binary variables between EMS and emergency department (ED)/hospital providers. A kappa statistic ≥0.60 was considered acceptable agreement. Results: After excluding 174 (7.6%) patients, 2,110 patients were included for analysis; median age was 73 years (interquartile range 62–85 years) and 1,259 (60%) were male. Per ED/hospital providers, the use of any anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent was identified in 595 (28.2%) patients. Kappa statistics between EMS and ED/hospital providers for the specific agents were: 0.76 (95% CI 0.71–0.82) for warfarin, 0.45 (95% CI 0.19–0.71) for DOAC agents, 0.33 (95% CI 0.28–0.39) for aspirin, and 0.51 (95% CI 0.42–0.60) for other antiplatelet agents. Conclusions: The use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications in older adults who are transported by EMS for head trauma is common. EMS and ED/hospital providers have acceptable agreement with preinjury warfarin use but not with DOAC, aspirin, and other antiplatelet use.

Influence of Studies Published by the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society: Top 20 Articles from 2000-2015.

Influence of Studies Published by the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society: Top 20 Articles from 2000-2015.

Correlations Among Physical Activity Level, Diet, and Prescription Medication Use in Older Adults

Correlations Among Physical Activity Level, Diet, and Prescription Medication Use in Older Adults

Pharmacologic Considerations in the Elderly Surgical Patient

The most rapidly growing segment of the elderly population corresponds to persons age 85 and over. As of 2006, elderly patients accounted for 35.3% of the inpatient and 32.1% of the outpatient surgical procedures occurring in the United States. Because age-related changes occur in each organ system in all elderly individuals, this population merits special consideration when undergoing surgical procedures. Furthermore, there is a high probability that older adults will have multiple chronic medical problems, which may present a complex medication management challenge. This review covers the pharmacologic impact of physiologic changes associated with aging, preoperative assessment, preoperative medication management, delirium and the impact of perioperative medications in the elderly, anesthesia and related medications, and specific drug classes and their use in the elderly surgical patient. Figures show an overview of the management of the elderly surgical patient, and preoperative medication management. Tables list medications that should be avoided in older patients with reduced renal function, drugs that exhibit additive adverse effects, medications with high anticholinergic activity, medications that inhibit and induce the CYP450 system, herbal supplements, 2015 Beers Criteria summary of potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults, drugs associated with postoperative delirium, risk factors for postoperative delirium, and clinical pharmacology of commonly used anesthetic agents. This review contains 2 highly rendered figures, 9 tables, and 61 references

Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Older Adults: Why the Revised Criteria Matter.

The 2 most widely used explicit criteria regarding inappropriate medication use in older adults are the American Geriatrics Society's Beers Criteria and the Screening Tool of Older People's Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (STOPP/START). Both documents were updated recently. They are important educational tools that highlight medications for which risks of use may often exceed benefits in older adults and situations in which potentially appropriate medications should be considered for use. The application of these tools has the potential to significantly affect patient care. Thus, it is important for clinicians to be familiar with both documents.

The 2015 American Geriatric Society Beers Criteria: Implications for Nurse Practitioners

The 2015 American Geriatric Society Beers Criteria (the 5th version) of potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults is scientifically rigorous and provides a modified Delphi method to systematically review and grade the evidence. All care settings are taken into consideration with the exception of hospice and palliative care. Nurse practitioners must be aware of this resource as a guide and reference in prescribing medications as primary care providers for the ever-growing over 65 population to identify and intervene in adverse drug reactions.

AUA White Paper on the Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults

IntroductionMedication related problems are common but may be preventable outcomes of prescribing choices. Risks associated with medications in the older adult population are greater due to changes in physiological function with age or disease. Older adults and those with significant comorbidities are often excluded from the clinical trials used to develop medications. In 2012 the American Geriatrics Society published the most recent update of the Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. Several medications included in sections of the Beers Criteria are frequently used in clinical urology, including nitrofurantoin, alpha-1 blocker medications, and antimuscarinic anticholinergic medications for the treatment of urge incontinence and overactive bladder. We describe the challenges and considerations that are useful in prescribing medications for geriatric patients. MethodsA literature review was performed targeting publications from 2003 to 2013 on the topics of the Beers Criteria, potentially inappropriate medications and specific urological medications included in the current version of the Beers Criteria. An expert panel was convened to evaluate this information and create this white paper with the purpose of educating the urological community on these issues. ResultsThe rationale for the creation and implementation of the Beers Criteria and its implications for urological practice are reviewed. Careful examination of the Beers Criteria can help clinicians avoid potentially inappropriate prescribing choices for their geriatric patients. We also identified that the HEDIS® high risk medications list of potentially inappropriate medications has been implemented as a negative quality indicator, even though this was not an original purpose of the Beers Criteria. In other words, decisions of denial of coverage and/or requirements for preauthorization are being made using the Beers Criteria as justification by third party payers and other entities. ConclusionsThe Beers Criteria were developed to improve prescribing practices for older adult patients to reduce or avoid potential risks and complications. We encourage clinicians to educate themselves about the Beers Criteria recommendations and associated initiatives that are aimed at improving the care of older adult patients. Urologists should have a key role in the development, evaluation, implementation and analysis of practice measures and the resulting policies.

Time trends in 20 years of medication use in older adults: Findings from three elderly cohorts in Stockholm, Sweden

New drugs and expanded drug indications are constantly being introduced. Welfare states strive to provide equity in drug treatment for all of its citizens and todaýs healthcare systems spend financial resources on drugs for the elderly in a higher rate than for any other age group. Drug utilization in elderly persons has an impact in health and wellbeing in older people. The purpose of the researchIt was to describe the changes in medication use including people aged 78 years and over regardless of residence and other characteristics over 20 years. Materials and methodsThe study population consisted of 4304 participants in three population-based cross-sectional surveys conducted in the Kungsholmen area of central Stockholm, Sweden. The participant’s current drug utilization was reviewed by physicians following standardized protocols. Data were statistical analyzed. Logistic regression models was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for use of analgesics and psychotropic drugs in the cohorts of 2001 and 2007, controlling for age, gender, education and cognition. The principal results and major conclusionsResults shows that the prevalence of medication use and polypharmacy in older adults has increased dramatically the late 1980s to the 2000s in central Stockholm, Sweden. In particular, the use of analgesics increased significantly, while some drug groups decreased, i.e., antipsychotics. Women used more medication than men in all three cohorts. Older adults living in service buildings used the largest amount of drugs in 1987, whereas those living in institutions were the most frequent users in 2001 and 2007.

Updated Beers Criteria: A more comprehensive guide to medication safety in older adults

P from all practice settings are likely familiar with the American Geriatric Society’s (AGS) Beers Criteria of Potentially Inappropriate Drugs, last published in 20121 and recently revised and updated in 2015.2 The AGS Beers Criteria—Beers Criteria for short—have proven useful in identifying drugs to potentially avoid in older adults, to reduce adverse drug events and drug-related problems, and to improve medication selection and overall medication safety in older adults. The Beers Criteria are designed for use in any clinical setting and can also be used as an educational quality measure and research tool. The latest version of the Beers Criteria uses a more comprehensive, systematic review and grading of evidence.

Potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in older adults with dementia

ObjectiveTo examine the prevalence and predictors of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in older adults with dementia. DesignA cross-sectional study. SettingUnited States, 2009–2010. ParticipantsMedical Expenditure Panel Survey participants aged 65years or older identified as having dementia. Main outcome measuresPrevalence and predictors of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use as per the updated 2012 American Geriatrics Society Beers criteria. ResultsA total of 3.78 million older adult patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.17 million to 4.38 million) were identified as having dementia, for an overall prevalence of 4.81%. Of those patients, an estimated 1.02 million (95% CI 0.70 million to 1.30 million) were reported to use potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications, for an overall prevalence of 26.95% (95% CI 20.10% to 33.79%). The most frequently prescribed drugs were oxybutynin, solifenacin, paroxetine, tolterodine, promethazine, and cyclobenzaprine. Multivariable logistic analysis revealed that patients with the need characteristics of self-reported anxiety, mood disorders, and “fair/poor” general health status had increased odds of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic use, while patients with the predisposing characteristic of being aged 75–84 years had decreased odds of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic use. ConclusionMore than one in four older adults with dementia were found to use potentially inappropriate anticholinergics. Given the adverse cognitive effects of these medications, there is a strong need to monitor and optimize their use in older adult patients with dementia.

American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults.

The 2015 American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers Criteria are presented. Like the 2012 AGS Beers Criteria, they include lists of potentially inappropriate medications to be avoided in older adults. New to the criteria are lists of select drugs that should be avoided or have their dose adjusted based on the individual's kidney function and select drug-drug interactions documented to be associated with harms in older adults. The specific aim was to have a 13-member interdisciplinary panel of experts in geriatric care and pharmacotherapy update the 2012 AGS Beers Criteria using a modified Delphi method to systematically review and grade the evidence and reach a consensus on each existing and new criterion. The process followed an evidence-based approach using Institute of Medicine standards. The 2015 AGS Beers Criteria are applicable to all older adults with the exclusion of those in palliative and hospice care. Careful application of the criteria by health professionals, consumers, payors, and health systems should lead to closer monitoring of drug use in older adults.

Anticholinergic medication use in older adults is associated with memory and hippocampal volume

Anticholinergic medication use in older adults is associated with memory and hippocampal volume

Anticholinergic medication use in older adults is associated with memory and hippocampal volume

Anticholinergic medication use in older adults is associated with memory and hippocampal volume

Older peoples' attitudes regarding polypharmacy, statin use and willingness to have statins deprescribed in Australia.

Deprescribing is the process of medication withdrawal with the aims of reducing the harms of potentially inappropriate medication use and improving patient outcomes. Deprescribing of statins may be indicated for some older people, because the evidence for benefit in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is limited and there is an increased risk of side effects in old age. To determine older peoples' attitudes and beliefs regarding medication use and their willingness to have regular medications, particularly statins, deprescribed. Setting An Australian acute-care hospital. A cross-sectional study of patients admitted to a teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia, aged ≥65 years and taking a statin was conducted. Attitudes and beliefs regarding medication use and willingness to have medications or statins deprescribed were captured using the validated Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing questionnaire, supplemented with additional statin-specific questions. Older inpatients' attitudes and perspectives towards stopping medications, in particular statins. Overall, 180 participants were recruited, with a median age of 78 years, (interquartile range 71-85). Eighty-nine percent (95% CI 84.4-93.6) of participants reported that they would be willing to stop one or more of their regular medications if their doctor said it was possible. Ninety-five percent (95% CI 91.8-98.2) agreed that they would be willing to have a statin deprescribed. Moreover, 94% (95% CI 90.5-97.5) of participants expressed concern regarding the potential side effects of taking a statin. The majority of older inpatients using statins are willing to have one or more of their current medications, including statins, deprescribed. These findings can be used to inform clinical practice and interventional statin deprescribing studies to optimise medication use in older adults.

Central nervous system medication use in older adults with intellectual disability: Results from the successful ageing in intellectual disability study.

Information on the rates and predictors of polypharmacy of central nervous system medication in older people with intellectual disability is limited, despite the increased life expectancy of this group. This study examined central nervous system medication use in an older sample of people with intellectual disability. Data regarding demographics, psychiatric diagnoses and current medications were collected as part of a larger survey completed by carers of people with intellectual disability over the age of 40 years. Recruitment occurred predominantly via disability services across different urban and rural locations in New South Wales and Victoria. Medications were coded according to the Monthly Index of Medical Specialties central nervous system medication categories, including sedatives/hypnotics, anti-anxiety agents, antipsychotics, antidepressants, central nervous system stimulants, movement disorder medications and anticonvulsants. The Developmental Behaviour Checklist for Adults was used to assess behaviour. Data were available for 114 people with intellectual disability. In all, 62.3% of the sample was prescribed a central nervous system medication, with 47.4% taking more than one. Of those who were medicated, 46.5% had a neurological diagnosis (a seizure disorder or Parkinson's disease) and 45.1% had a psychiatric diagnosis (an affective or psychotic disorder). Linear regression revealed that polypharmacy was predicted by the presence of neurological and psychiatric diagnosis, higher Developmental Behaviour Checklist for Adults scores and male gender. This study is the first to focus on central nervous system medication in an older sample with intellectual disability. The findings are in line with the wider literature in younger people, showing a high degree of prescription and polypharmacy. Within the sample, there seems to be adequate rationale for central nervous system medication prescription. Although these data do not indicate non-adherence to guidelines for prescribing in intellectual disability, the high rate of polypharmacy and its relationship to Developmental Behaviour Checklist for Adults scores reiterate the importance of continued medication review in older people with intellectual disability.

Alternative methods of pain management for the older adult population: Review of topical pain medications

AbstractThe older adult population is one of the fastest growing age groups in the United States. As this population continues to expand, determining the safest way to provide pain management has become increasingly important. More than 50% of community-dwelling older adults experience pain on a daily basis, and up to 83% of those in assisted living facilities experience persistent pain. Pain is exceedingly challenging to treat safely and effectively in the elderly because of the physiologic changes that occur as people age. In addition, many nonnarcotic medications with analgesic properties are listed in both the 2012 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults and the Pharmacy Quality Alliance high-risk medications lists. An approach to the growing challenge of managing pain in the elderly that is gaining popularity among community-dwelling patients is the use of topical pain medications. The goal of this article is to review some of the available literature regarding the use of various topical analgesics alone or in combination, and to discuss their known or theoretical mechanisms of peripheral pain modulation. Commercially available or compounded topical pain medications may be used to replace or augment doses of oral medications in an effort to decrease the risk of adverse drug events for older adult patients. When prescribing topical pain medications physicians should consider the nature of the pain targeted, the type of analgesia expected from each ingredient, the potential for systemic absorption, and related side effects.

Potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in community-dwelling older adults: a national cross-sectional study.

Inappropriate medications are often used in older adults despite their unfavourable risk-to-benefit profile. Although many of the medications in the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers list are potentially inappropriate because of their anticholinergic properties, little is known regarding the nature and extent of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in older adults. To determine the prevalence of, and factors associated with, potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in the older population. A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted, involving older adults (aged 65 years and older), using 2009-2010 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data. The 2012 AGS Beers Criteria were used to define potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications on the basis of the list of medications to avoid using in older adults irrespective of the diagnosis. Descriptive analyses were used to examine the nature and extent of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use. Multivariable logistic regression within the conceptual framework of the Andersen Behavioral Model was used to identify the factors associated with potentially inappropriate anticholinergic use in older adults. According to the MEPS, there were 78.60 million older adults in the USA; an estimated 7.51 million (9.56 %) of these older adults used potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications in 2009-2010. The most frequently used potentially inappropriate anticholinergics were cyclobenzaprine, promethazine, amitriptyline, hydroxyzine and dicyclomine. Multivariable regression analyses revealed that female sex, residing in the South and the presence of anxiety disorder increased the likelihood of receiving potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications, whereas older adults aged 75-84 or ≥ 85 years, and those with over 15 years of education, had a decreased likelihood of receiving potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications. The study found that approximately one in ten older adults used potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications. Several predisposing, enabling and need factors were associated with the use of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications. Concerted efforts are needed to optimize potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in older adults.

Racial differences in anticholinergic use among community-dwelling elders.

Few studies have examined racial differences in potentially inappropriate medication use. The objective of this study was to examine racial disparities in using prescription and/or nonprescription anticholinergics, a type of potentially inappropriate medication, over time. Longitudinal. Data from the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study (years 1, 5, and 10). Three thousand fifty-five community-dwelling older adults, both blacks and whites, at year 1. Highly anticholinergic medication use per the 2012 American Geriatrics Society Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. Blacks represented 41.4% of the participants at year 1. At year 1, 13.4% of blacks used an anticholinergic medication compared with 17.8% of whites, and this difference persisted over the ensuing 10-year period. Diphenhydramine was the most common anticholinergic medication reported at baseline and year 5, and meclizine at year 10, for both races. Controlling for demographics, health status, and access to care factors, blacks were 24% to 45% less likely to use any anticholinergics compared with whites over the years considered (all P < 0.05). The use of prescription and/or nonprescription anticholinergic medications was less common in older blacks than whites over a 10-year period, and the difference was unexplained by demographics, health status, and access to care.

Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults using the 2012 Beers criteria.

To use the most recently available population-based data to estimate potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) prevalence under the 2012 update of the Beers list of PIMs and to provide a benchmark from which to measure future changes. Retrospective cohort study using nationally representative data. 2006-2010 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Community-dwelling sample of U.S. older adults (N=18,475). The updated Beers criteria were operationalized, generating a "broad" PIM definition that incorporated form, route, or dose restrictions where clearly specified and a "qualified" definition that applied specific exceptions where mentioned in the rationale associated with each drug category. Bivariate analyses described PIM prevalence, comparing the two operational definitions, and examined time trends. Of older adults with prescription medications, 42.6% had at least one medication fill that met the broad definition, with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) having the highest prevalence (10.9%). The rate declined from 45.5% in 2006-2007 to 40.8% in 2009-2010. The categories with the largest absolute decline were NSAIDs, selected sulfonylureas, and estrogens. PIM prevalence was 30.9% using the qualified definition. Despite the overall high use of PIMs, there has been a decline observed in recent years. Future studies should test the effect of educational and clinical interventions on changes in PIM use and outcomes. The current study results can aid in targeting these interventions.

Prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults Using the 2012 Beers Criteria

Prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults Using the 2012 Beers Criteria