Medications In Older People Research Articles

Deprescribing to reduce polypharmacy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial assessing deprescribing of anticholinergic and sedative drugs in a cohort of frail older people living in the community

BackgroundTargeted deprescribing of anticholinergic and sedative medications in older people may improve their health outcomes. This trial will determine if pharmacist-led reviews lead to general practitioners deprescribing anticholinergic and sedative medications in older people living in the community.Methods and analysisThe standard protocol items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) checklist was used to develop and report the protocol. The trial will involve older adults stratified by frailty (low, medium, and high). This will be a pragmatic two-arm randomized controlled trial to test general practitioner uptake of pharmacist recommendations to deprescribe anticholinergic and sedative medications that are causing adverse side effects in patients.Study populationCommunity-dwelling frail adults, 65 years or older, living in the Canterbury region of New Zealand, seeking publicly funded home support services or admission to aged residential care and taking at least one anticholinergic or sedative medication regularly.InterventionNew Zealand registered pharmacists using peer-reviewed deprescribing guidelines will visit participants at home in the community, review their medications, and recommend anticholinergic and sedative medications that could be deprescribed to the participant’s general practitioner. The total use of anticholinergic and sedative medications will be quantified using the Drug Burden Index (DBI).OutcomesThe primary outcome will be the change in total DBI between baseline and 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include entry into aged residential care, prolonged hospitalization, and death.Data collection pointsData will be collected at the time of interRAI assessments (T0), at the time of the baseline review (T1), at 6 months following the baseline review (T2), and at the end of the study period, or end of study participation for participants admitted into aged residential care, or who died (T3).Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been obtained from the Human, Disability and Ethics Committee: ethical number (17CEN265).Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ACTRN12618000729224. Registered on May 2, 2018, with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry

Decreasing trends in potentially inappropriate medications in older people: a nationwide repeated cross-sectional study

BackgroundPotentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) and polypharmacy are widely used indicators of suboptimal prescribing for older people. The aim of this study was to describe the changes in the prevalence of PIMs and polypharmacy among people aged 75 years and over between 2011 and 2019 in France.MethodsPIMs and polypharmacy were assessed among people aged 75 years and over every two years between 2011 and 2019 using the French health insurance data system. Sixteen PIM criteria from the 2015 Beers and STOPP lists were assessed. Polypharmacy (5 to 9 drugs) and hyper-polypharmacy (≥10 drugs) were defined based on the average number of drugs dispensed per quarter. The Annual Percent Change (APC) and 95%CI were assessed using linear regression models after standardization of the prevalence on age and sex.ResultsThe study population included 5,777,645 individuals over 75 years old in 2011 and 6,328,155 in 2019. The prevalence of PIMs decreased from 49.6 to 39.6% over the study period (APC: − 1.19% [− 1.35;-1.04]). Of the sixteen indicators assessed, the prevalence of thirteen decreased between 2011 and 2019. Benzodiazepines were the most frequent PIMs (34.7% in 2011 to 26.9% in 2019), followed by anticholinergic drugs (12.1% in 2011 to 8.3% in 2019), oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (11.4 to 7.8%), and PIMs related to antihypertensive drugs (7.4 to 6.0%). Overall, women and individuals aged 85 years and older were more likely to receive PIMs. The prevalence of hyper-polypharmacy decreased from 30.5 to 25.9% over the study period.ConclusionThis study, which is the first to assess the change in prevalence of PIMs and polypharmacy over time from comprehensive health data in France, highlights that PIMs and hyper-polypharmacy declined between 2011 and 2019. However, PIMs remains frequent for older people and often involves benzodiazepines.

Specific Prescribing Information for Geriatric Use in the 2019 Product Labeling for Novel New Drug Approvals.

Objectives To review the availability of information specific to older people in the product labeling for novel US Food and Drug Administration drug approvals in 2019. Design Descriptive report. Methods Product labeling for the 48 novel new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2019 were analyzed for the presence of information specific to older people. The "Geriatric Use" section, Section 8.5 in the product labeling, was categorized based on the information available. Each product label was further searched using the terms "geriatric," "elderly," "old," and "year." Searches of the term "old" and "year" focused on information that mentioned adults 65 years of age or older. The sections of the product label that contained additional information related to older people was identified. Results Information was available in the "Geriatric Use" section (Section 8.5) for 46 of the 48 novel new drugs approved in 2019; 2 did not include a "Geriatric Use" section. Four product labels indicated that the drugs were not used in older people. One of the 2 medications whose labeling omitted the "Geriatric Use" section was also not indicated for use in older people. These labels were excluded from analysis.Of the remaining 42 drugs, there was insufficient numbers of patients 65 years of age and older to determine whether older patients responded differently than younger patients for 18 medications. Labeling for 15 medications indicated that there was no difference in safety and/or efficacy between younger and older persons. Product information for 6 medications indicated that the incidence of adverse events was higher for older people. The product label for 2 medications indicated that no dosage adjustment was required in older patients. One medication's product labeling indicated that there were insufficient numbers of patients 65 years of age or older for 1 indication but that there was no difference in safety and/or efficacy for the medication's second indication. Additional sections that referred to people 65 years of age and older included warnings and precautions, clinical trial experience, pharmacokinetics for special populations, and clinical studies. The "Geriatric Use" section of 1 product label referred to the dosage recommendations in patients with renal impairment. Conclusion Despite efforts to increase the enrollment of older people in clinical trials, 43% of the novel new drugs approved in 2019 lacked information on differences in response between older and younger populations because of insufficient numbers of study subjects. This paucity of information translates into therapeutic uncertainty regarding the safety and efficacy of these new medications in older people. An additional concern is that 14% of novel new drug labels indicated that older people are at greater risk for adverse events. Limited information specific to older people is available in other parts of the product labeling. More useful information related to older persons needs to be included in new drug labeling.

Discontinuation of diabetes medication in the 10 years before death in Denmark: a register-based study

Discontinuation of diabetes medication in the last years of life has been suggested to improve quality of life while deemed safe to implement. However, the extent, patterns, and secular changes in discontinuation of glucose-lowering medication in older people with type 2 diabetes have been scarcely described. We therefore aimed to describe the trends in the use of glucose-lowering medication during the last 10 years of life of older people and explore how key clinical and socioeconomic covariates are associated with these patterns. In this register-based cohort study, all individuals with type 2 diabetes who died aged 80 years or older between Jan 1, 2006, and Dec 31, 2018, were identified through the Danish Diabetes Register and linked to the Danish National Prescription Registry. We followed the population backwards in time from death to date of last medication intake. To estimate the cumulative proportion of people on glucose-lowering medication, a Poisson regression model for the rate of medication as a function of time before death (0 to 10 years before death) and calendar year of death (2006-18) was fitted. Both single-substance and combination glucose-lowering medications were included and categorised as insulins, sulfonylureas, metformin, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 analogues, SGLT2 inhibitors, acarbose, and thiazolidinediones. Insulin was further subdivided into four groups: fast-acting, intermediate-acting, long-acting, and mixed insulin. To identify which covariates were associated with discontinuation, estimates were adjusted for sex, age at death, diabetes duration at time of death, the total number of diabetes complications at time of death (from no complications to four or more), level of education, immigrant status, and income quartile. 52 523 individuals (28 746 [54·7%] females and 23 777 [45·3%] males) were identified, with a mean age at type 2 diabetes diagnosis of 77 years (SD 8), median age at death of 86 years (IQR 83-90), and median diabetes duration at death of 9 years (IQR 5-14). We found a considerable discontinuation of glucose-lowering medication during the last 10 years of life, with the proportion of people on glucose-lowering medication starting at between 89% (95% CI 87-91) in 2006 and 87% (86-88) in 2018 at 10 years before death and decreasing to between 52% (50-54) in 2006 and 38% (37-39) in 2018 at the time of death. Specifically, we found that the proportion of people on sulfonylureas, at any time before death, decreased substantially from 2006 to 2018, whereas the proportion on metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors increased with calendar year of death. Changes were less pronounced for the remaining medications. The overall discontinuation patterns changed with increasing calendar year of death, such that discontinuation rates increased and occurred earlier (further away from time of death) with increasing calendar year. Discontinuations were generally more pronounced during the last year of life. Proportions of people on medication and patterns of discontinuation, as well as the association with covariates, varied with medication class. Covariates most frequently associated with changes in discontinuation rates were sex, age at death, type 2 diabetes duration at death, and number of complications. For example, females were less likely to receive metformin than males at all years before death (rate ratio 0·91 (95% CI 0·89-0·94, p<0·0001), and there was a negative association between the proportion of individuals on metformin and increasing age at death (rate ratio per year increase 0·96 [0·96-0·96], p<0·0001) and type 2 diabetes duration (0·95 per year increase [0·94-0·95], p<0·0001). Our results suggest that increased focus on and implementation of discontinuation of glucose-lowering medication in recent years might have had an effect on discontinuation patterns, particularly during the last year of life. None.

Appropriate deprescribing in older people: a challenging necessityCommentary to accompany themed collection on deprescribing.

Older people are often taking several medications for a number of different medical conditions. Although physicians prescribe medications to treat diseases and symptoms, there may be also harmful side effects, especially so in older people taking several medications. Unfortunately, regular review of the benefits or risks of prescribed medications is as of yet not part of standard care. Also, data on how and in whom to stop medications in older people are scarce. The reason this is an important area of work is that medication related issues in older people are a common cause of harm, including both expected and unexpected effects of medications. Research to date tells us that to ensure successful implementation of structured and appropriate deprescribing, careful planning within hospital systems is needed. This includes involving different members of the team to ensure the patients truly benefit. The themed collection published on the Age and Ageing journal website offers key articles providing tools to assist decision-making, implementation strategies and multidisciplinary interventions-all with the aim of improving patient outcome and sustainability of deprescribing approaches.

Centrally-acting anticholinergic drugs– associations with mortality, hospitalisation and cognitive decline following dementia diagnosis in people receiving antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs

Objectives Long-term use of anticholinergic medication in older people is associated with increased risk of cognitive decline and mortality, but this relationship could be confounded by the underlying illness the drugs are treating. To investigate associations between central anticholinergic antidepressants or antipsychotics and mortality, hospitalisation and cognitive decline in people with dementia. Method In cohorts of patients with a dementia diagnosis receiving antidepressant and/or antipsychotic medication (N = 4,380 and N = 2,335 respectively), assembled from a large healthcare database, central anticholinergic burden scores were estimated using the Anticholinergic Effect on Cognition (AEC) scale. Data were linked to national mortality and hospitalisation data sources, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores were used to investigate cognitive decline. Results There was a reduced mortality risk in people receiving agents with high central anticholinergic burden compared to those with no or low burden which was statistically significant in the antidepressant cohort (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-0.98; p = 0.023) but not the antipsychotic one (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.82-1.02; p = 0.105). Patients on antidepressants with no central anticholinergic burden had accelerated cognitive decline compared with other groups, whereas no differences were found in the antipsychotic cohort. No significant associations were detected between antidepressant or antipsychotic-related central anticholinergic burden and hospitalisation. Conclusion These counter-intuitive findings may reflect factors underlying the choice of psychotropics rather than the agents themselves, although do not support a strong role for central anticholinergic drug actions on dementia outcomes. Further studies, including randomized switching of agents are needed to clarify this relationship.

Medication Related Problems

When selecting and managing psychoactive medications in older people, it is equally important to focus on avoidance of toxicity as it is to focus on efficacy. Higher psychoactive medication load is associated with increased rate and risk of all cause hospitalization. The medication classes used to treat depression and related comorbidities include antidepressants, antipsychotics, stimulants, mood stabilizers, lithium, anxiolytics and sedative hypnotics. This discussion will examine considerations to help avoid medication related problems relevant to medications used to treat depression in the antidepressant pharmacological class.

Depression Part 3: Medication Related Problems.

When selecting and managing psychoactive medications in older people, it is equally important to focus on avoidance of toxicity as it is to focus on efficacy. Higher psychoactive medication load is associated with increased rate and risk of all cause hospitalization. The medication classes used to treat depression and related comorbidities include antidepressants, antipsychotics, stimulants, mood stabilizers, lithium, anxiolytics and sedative hypnotics. This discussion will examine considerations to help avoid medication related problems relevant to medications used to treat depression in the antidepressant pharmacological class.

Guidance for appropriate use of psychotropic drugs in older people

Psychotropic drugs are widely prescribed in older people although their use is associated with important risks. In this position paper, we discuss the appropriateness of using these medications in older people in terms of different aspects such as indications, contraindications, dosing, adverse drug reactions, interactions and duration of therapy. Consequently, we discuss different strategies to increase the appropriateness of therapy while formulating some practical recommendations to keep in mind when (de)prescribing psychotropic drugs in older people.

Assessment of Appropriateness of Cardiovascular Preventive Medication in Adults ≥ 75 years

Physicians are confronted with dilemma’s on cardiovascular preventive medication for older people with complex health problems. With accumulation of diseases, limitations and shortening life expectancy, questions arise for whom cardiovascular preventive treatment is still appropriate (the expected benefits of treatment exceeds the negative consequences by a sufficiently wide margin resulting that treatment is worth doing). There is a need for more guidance in clinical situations. With the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method (RUAM), we investigated the appropriateness of cardiovascular preventive medication in adults ≥ 75 years. The RUAM is a systematic, formalized method, to combine available scientific evidence with the collective judgment of experts. Fourteen interdisciplinary panelists (9 physicians representing 6 medical disciplines, 1 medical ethics expert, 1 pharmacist and 3 older adults [lay man]), discussed and rated the appropriateness of starting and stopping of three medication groups (cholesterol lowering, blood pressure lowering and thrombocyte aggregation inhibitors) for different clinical scenarios (combinations of cardiovascular history, systolic blood pressure, complexity of health problems, age, life-expectancy, side-effects). Depending on the medication group, different patterns of appropriateness judgments across the clinical scenarios were found. In general, absence of cardiovascular disease, presence of complex health problems, a short life-expectancy or hindering side-effects were important factors to judge cardiovascular preventive medication as inappropriate. Results were summarized into colored reading maps. These findings can offer more guidance in clinical decision making about cardiovascular preventive treatment for adults ≥ 75 years.

Development and psychometric testing of the Gerontological Nursing Competence (GeroNursingCom) instrument.

To develop and psychometrically test an instrument - GeroNursingCom - that measures gerontological nursing competence of nursing students. An instrument development guided by COSMIN guidelines. The development and testing of the GeroNursingCom instrument proceeded according to four distinct phases: (a) establishing a theoretical background; (b) testing face and content validity; (c) examining structural validity; and (d) testing internal consistency. The items of instrument were based on a theoretical framework developed from a comprehensive literature review and focus group interviews with experts (N=27) in spring 2018. Content validity was assessed by nine experts in gerontological nursing, while face validity was tested in a pilot study including 36 nursing students. Structural validity was examined with exploratory factor analysis with 267 nursing students from nine universities of applied sciences. The internal consistency was established with Cronbach's alpha. The data were collected in spring and autumn 2019. The data analysis was conducted with multivariate statistical methods. The GeroNursingCom development and testing process yielded an instrument that includes 53 items across 11 factors: (a) appreciative encounters and interactions with older people; (b) medication for older people; (c) nutrition for older people; (d) safe living environment for older people; (e) supporting the functioning of older people; (f) end-of-life care; (g) developing one's competencies; (h) supporting an older person's mental well-being; (i) supporting an older person's sexuality; (j) guiding self-care among older people; and (k) responding to challenging situations. The instrument was able to explain 66.15% of the total observed variance, while Cronbach's alpha values for individual items varied from 0.75-0.89. TheGeroNursingCom instrument can be used to measure gerontological nursing competence among nursing students to improve gerontological nursing education and/or geriatric care. Graduating nursing students must develop versatile competencies to face the multiple needs of older patients and curriculums need to be further developed to ensure students are prepared for gerontological nursing.

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Studies on the Adverse Effects of Medications in Australian Aged care Facilities: A Scoping Review.

Aim: this scoping review was designed to identify studies that assess adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for older people in Australian aged care facilities. This review critically evaluates each published study to identify the risk of, or actual, adverse drug events in older people. Inclusion criteria: this review considered any clinical studies that examined the adverse effects of medications in older people who were living in aged care facilities. This review considered qualitative studies, analytical studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), descriptive cross-sectional studies, and analytic observational studies that explored the use of medications and their adverse effects on older people in clinical settings (including aged care facilities). Methods: an initial search of the PubMed (United State National Library of Medicine), OvidSP, EBSCOHost, ScienceDirect, Wiley Online, SAGE, and SCOPUS databases, with full text was performed, followed by an analysis of the article’s title and abstract. Additionally, MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) was used to describe the article. The initial round of the database search was based on inclusion criteria from studies that assessed tools or protocols aiming to identify the adverse effects of medications on the elderly population suffering chronic conditions or multiple co-morbidities. Two reviewers screened the retrieved papers for inclusion. The data presented in this review are in tabular forms and accompanied by a narrative summary which aligns with the review’s objectives. Results: seven studies were identified, and the extracted data from these studies were grouped according their characteristics and the auditing results of each study. Conclusion: it would be beneficial to design a comprehensive or broadly adverse drug reaction assessment tool derived from Australian data that has been used on the elderly in an Australian healthcare setting.

Why deprescribing instead of not prescribing?

Prescribing medications involves complex cognitive processes, and mistakes in prescription can cause serious adverse events. Deprescribing is one of the last opportunities to prevent patient harm from the use of drugs that should be avoided, especially among older patients. This viewpoint article aims to discuss the prescription process and some essential concepts, such as polypharmacy, prescription of potentially inappropriate medications, and, particularly, the relevance of deprescribing and its relationship with the appropriate prescription of medications in older people.

Pain and Inflammation Management in Older Adults: A Brazilian Consensus of Potentially Inappropriate Medication and Their Alternative Therapies.

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIM) list and alternative therapies for treatment of pain and inflammation in older people adapted to the Brazilian context. Methods: A preliminary PIM list suitable for the Brazilian market was developed on the basis of three published international PIM lists [Beers 2015, Screening Tool of Older People’s Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions - 2015, European Union (7) PIM list]. We used the modified Delphi technique (two-round) to validate concerns of use and alternative therapies related to PIM for treatment of pain and inflammation in older adults ≥65 years in Brazil. The panel involved nine Brazilian experts in geriatric pharmacotherapy. All items with mean Likert scale score ≥4.0 (agree) and the lower limit of 95% confidence interval ≥4.0 were considered validated in this study. Results: At the end of the consensus process, 94 (65.3%) items of 144 were validated. In total, consensus was reached for 33/35 (94.3%) concerns about drugs that should be avoided in older patients regardless of diagnosis, for 22/23 (95.7%) concerns about drugs that should be avoided in older patients with specific conditions or diseases, for 11/23 (47.8%) with special considerations of use, and for 28/63 (44.4%) of therapeutic alternatives. Conclusion: Although these criteria are not designed to replace clinical judgement, PIM and alternative therapies lists can be useful to inform prescribers, pharmacists, and health care planners and may serve as a starting point for safe and effective use of medications in older people.

Development of a Complex Intervention to Improve Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication in Older People Using an Anthropomorphic Virtual Assistant Software.

Introduction: Improving adherence to antidiabetic medication is crucial, resulting in improved health outcomes, cost reduction, and minimization of waste. A lack of underlying theory in existing interventions may explain the limited success in sustaining behavior change. This paper describes the development of a theory and evidence-based complex intervention to improve adherence to oral antidiabetics in older people via a software prototype with an anthropomorphic virtual assistant. Methods: The Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) was used to develop a theoretical understanding of the change process, corresponding to the first phase of the Medical Research Council Framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. At the BCW core is a model of human behavior (COM-B), which posits that human behavior (B) results from the interaction between capabilities (C), opportunities (O), and motivation (M). Literature-derived medication adherence determinants were mapped onto COM-B components. Then, intervention functions (IFs) were selected employing the APEASE criteria. Finally, standardized behavior change techniques (BCTs) were chosen based on their suitability and their effectiveness on medication adherence trials. The prototype was developed for android devices; its core was implemented in Unity3D, using a female 3D virtual assistant, named Vitória. Results: Two COM-B components were identified as main targets for behavior change—psychological capability and reflective motivation; these were linked with four IFs—education, persuasion, enablement, and environmental restructuring. Eleven BCTs were, in turn, linked with the IFs. An example of a BCT is “problem solving”; it requires users to pinpoint factors influencing non-adherence and subsequently offers strategies to achieve the desired behavior. BCTs were operationalized into the dialogues with Vitória and into supplementary software features. Vitória communicates with users verbally and non-verbally, expressing emotions. Input options consist of buttons or recording values, such as medication taken. Conclusion: The present approach enabled us to derive the most appropriate BCTs for our intervention. The use of an explicit bundle of BCTs, often overlooked in interventions promoting medication adherence, is expected to maximize effectiveness and facilitates replication. The first prototype is being refined with users and health professionals’ contributions. Future work includes subjecting the prototype to usability tests and a feasibility trial.

Reducing risk of harm from sedative–hypnotic medications in older people

Reducing risk of harm from sedative–hypnotic medications in older people

Shared decision-making about cardiovascular disease medication in older people: a qualitative study of patient experiences in general practice

ObjectivesTo explore older people’s perspectives and experiences with shared decision-making (SDM) about medication for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention.Design, setting and participantsSemi-structured interviews with 30 general practice patients aged 75 years...

A systematic review and novel classification of listing tools to improve medication in older people

Suboptimal drugs therapy is a threat to older people, and listing tools providing guidance are developed to address this problem. A systematic review was performed to identify and analyze such tools published until February 2018. A novel categorization was developed to separate patient-in-focus listing approaches (PILA) providing disease-related positive and negative guidance from drug-oriented, mostly negative listing approaches (DOLA, DOLA+: with disease specification). In total, 76 tools were identified; only 9 were classified as PILA, 26 as DOLA, and 38 as DOLA+. Three DOLA(+) only address dementia. Most tools were developed in Europe or the USA and address community-dwellers. Thirty-two utilized a Delphi process, and only 10 provide a scoring system. Twenty tools utilize a questionnaire but no structured guidance or answers. Importantly, only 12 interventional clinical trials were identified reporting not only medication quality measures, but also clinical endpoints (e.g. falls, adverse drug reactions, hospitalization). For PILA, 4 trials showed positive, one negative clinical effects of a controlled intervention, for DOLA(+) 1 was positive, 7 negative (Fisher's exact test p < 0.05). An abundance of listing tools has been created. DOLAs that may be applied without intricate patient knowledge prevail over PILAs by sevenfold; unfortunately their clinical validation seems to be far less successful than that of patient-initiated approaches. Drug therapy in older people has to be tailored to their individual, very divergent needs; tools requiring detailed medical knowledge about the patient as the starting point for medication optimization provide the best support.

The updated PIM-Taiwan criteria: a list of potentially inappropriate medications in older people.

Background:Explicit criteria for potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) developed for other countries are difficult to apply to a specific territory. This study aimed to update the PIM-Taiwan criteria from a qualitative review of several published PIM criteria, followed by consensus among regional experts in Taiwan.Methods:After a review of the literature, we selected four sets of published PIM criteria to construct preliminary core PIMs. The Beers criteria, Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA), and Japan criteria were used for PIMs, without consideration of chronic diseases. The Beers criteria, Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria, and Japan criteria were used for PIMs with respect to chronic diseases. We asked experts (n = 24) to rate their agreement with each statement, including in the final PIM criteria, after two rounds of modified Delphi methods. The intraclass coefficient (ICC) was used to examine the reliability of the modified Delphi method.Results:Overall, two categories of PIMs were established: 131 individual drugs and 9 drugs with combinations that should generally be avoided; and 9 chronic diseases with their corresponding PIMs that have drug–disease interactions. The ICC estimates for PIMs to be avoided generally were 0.634 and 0.557 (round 1 and 2) and those for PIMs with respect to chronic diseases were 0.866 and 0.775 (round 1 and 2) of the Delphi method, respectively.Conclusions:The 2018 version of PIM-Taiwan criteria was established and several modifications were made to keep the criteria updated and relevant. Clinicians can use them to reduce polypharmacy and PIMs among older patients.

The deprescribing rainbow: a conceptual framework highlighting the importance of patient context when stopping medication in older people

The area of “deprescribing” has rapidly expanded in recent years as a positive intervention to reduce inappropriate polypharmacy and improve health outcomes for (older) people with multimorbidity. While our understanding of deprescribing as a process has greatly improved and existing approaches all have patient-centered elements, there is still limited literature exploring the importance of the individual patient context in deprescribing decision-making. This is clearly an important consideration to ensure that any deprescribing approach is ethical, respectful, and successful. To address this gap in the literature, we have developed a conceptual framework in the form of a rainbow – with five different deprescribing determinants – and place the person at the center of the deprescribing process. This framework is informed by literature on patient-centered care for older people and people with multimorbidity. We illustrate the potential application of this framework to a complex patient case to highlight the importance of the different clinical, psychological, social, financial and physical deprescribing determinants, and how this approach could be adopted by those working in clinical practice.