Medication Treatment For Opioid Use Disorder Research Articles

Dynamics of prescribing and accessing medications for opioid use disorder: a community-based systems analysis

Background Although medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are effective for treating opioid use disorder (OUD), persistent barriers still prevent patients from accessing this life-saving care. Policies to increase MOUD access have produced suboptimal results. This study presents a qualitative system dynamics model that elucidates the complexities of accessing and staying in MOUD treatment. Methods We utilized a community-based system dynamics approach to modeling the MOUD treatment system. We engaged a cohort of system experts/stakeholders, including individuals who had received MOUD, treatment providers, and policymakers, in interviews and group model building to develop and refine a simulation model. We then created a qualitative causal loop diagram based on insights gained while developing the simulation model and a review of interview transcripts. Results The causal loop diagram captures four key factors affecting treatment initiation, retention, and leaving: (1) fraught interactions between patients and healthcare providers; (2) stigma-driven regulation of MOUD creating a culture of fear and defensive medicine; (3) a punitive culture in clinics and opioid treatment programs offering MOUD; and (4) the internalization of the abstinence narrative contributing to premature termination of treatment. Conclusions Our analysis highlights how interdependent and non-linear feedback processes diminish or counteract the effectiveness and sustainability of MOUD policy interventions. Due to system memory and cultural resistance to change, even rolling back reactionary policies may do little to curb established behavioral patterns. In addition, conflicting and competing strategies among various actors within the system contribute to goal misalignment and a lack of standardization of care.

Assessing the Safety, User Acceptability, Dissemination, and Reach of a Comprehensive Web-Based Resource on Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD Hub): Protocol for a Development and Usability Study.

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), such as methadone and buprenorphine, are the gold standard for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment. Owing to various barriers, MOUD access and retention are low in the United States. The internet presents a digital solution to mitigate barriers, but a comprehensive and reliable resource is lacking. We present a user-friendly, web-based resource, the MOUD Hub, that provides reliable information on MOUD. This study aims to assess the safety, acceptability, feasibility of dissemination, and reach of the MOUD Hub using focus groups and advertising on 1 key search engine and 1 social media platform. This protocol describes the development of the MOUD Hub and the descriptive observational feasibility study that will be undertaken. The MOUD Hub uses motivational interviewing principles to guide users through the stages of change. The website provides evidence-based information from national health and substance use agencies, harm reduction organizations, and peer-reviewed literature. First, pilot focus groups with 10 graduate students who have lived experience with OUD will be conducted to provide feedback on safety concerns. Then, focus groups with 20-30 potential MOUD Hub users (eg, people with OUD with and without MOUD experience, friends and family, and health care providers) will be conducted to assess safety, acceptability, reach, and usability. Data will be analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. The website will be advertised on Google and MOUD-specific Reddit forums to assess dissemination, reach, and user acceptability based on the total user volume, sociodemographic characteristics, pop-up survey responses, and 1-year engagement patterns. This information will be collected through Google Analytics. Potential differences between users from Google and Reddit will be assessed. The MOUD Hub will be launched in January 2025. Data collected from 5 focus groups (approximately 30-40 participants) will be used to improve the website before launching it. There is no target sample size for the second stage of the study as it aims to assess dissemination feasibility and reach. Data will be collected for a year, analyzed every 3 months, and used to improve the website. The MOUD Hub offers an innovative theory-based approach, tailored to people with OUD and their family and friends, to increase access to and retention in MOUD treatment in the United States and provides broader harm reduction resources for those not currently in a position to receive treatment or those at risk of resuming illicit opioid use. Findings from this feasibility phase will serve to better tailor the MOUD Hub. After modifying the website based on our findings, we will use a randomized controlled trial to assess its efficacy in increasing MOUD access and retention, contributing to growing research on web-based interventions for OUD. PRR1-10.2196/57065.

Toward a Consensus on Strategies to Support Opioid Use Disorder Care Transitions Following Hospitalization: A Modified Delphi Process.

Despite proliferation of acute-care interventions to initiate medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), significant challenges remain to supporting care continuity following discharge. Research is needed to inform effective hospital strategies to support patient transitions to ongoing MOUD in the community. To inform a taxonomy of care transition strategies to support MOUD continuity from hospital to community-based settings and assess their perceived impact and feasibility among experts in the field. A modified Delphi consensus process through three rounds of electronic surveys. Experts in hospital-based opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment, care transitions, and hospital-based addiction treatment. Delphi participants rated the impact and feasibility of 14 OUD care transition strategies derived from a review of the scientific literature on a scale from 1 to 9 over three survey rounds. Panelists were invited to suggest additional care transition strategies. Agreement level was calculated based on proportion of ratings within three points of the median. Forty-five of 71 invited panelists participated in the survey. Agreement on impact was strong for 12 items and moderate for 10. Agreement on feasibility was strong for 11 items, moderate for 7, and poor for 4. Strategies with highest ratings on impact and feasibility included initiation of MOUD in-hospital and provision of buprenorphine prescriptions or medications before discharge. All original 14 strategies and 8 additional strategies proposed by panelists were considered medium- or high-impact and were incorporated into a final taxonomy of 22 OUD care transition strategies. Our study established expert consensus on impactful and feasible hospital strategies to support OUD care transitions from the hospital to community-based MOUD treatment, an area with little empirical research thus far. It is the hope that this taxonomy serves as a stepping-stone for future evaluations and clinical practice implementation toward improved MOUD continuity and health outcomes.

Adapting behavioral activation for patients receiving medications for opioid use disorder in primary care: a pilot study.

Effective adjunctive therapeutic treatments for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) on medication for OUD (MOUD) in primary care settings are needed to address high rates of mental illness and stress. Behavioral activation (BA) is a brief, evidence-based therapy that has potential to improve quality of life in people with OUD. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of values-based BA (VBA) as an adjunct treatment for patients receiving MOUD in primary care. Participants were recruited for a single-arm pilot trial of BA in a primary care setting. VBA was adapted for people with OUD and included 4-6 sessions delivered over 12 weeks with a behavioral health consultant, either in-person or virtually. Feasibility was assessed as recruitment percent and pace and retention percent. Acceptability was assessed with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8). Participants completed self-report measures of well-being, depression, substance use, and psychological processes of change at baseline, mid-intervention (6-weeks), and post-intervention (12-weeks). Participants engaged in a brief interview about their experiences at the end of the intervention. Twenty-one participants enrolled in the intervention (66.7% female, M age = 44.0 years, 19% of those invited). Participants completed an average of 5.1 BA sessions (SD = 1.6) and most (90%) were retained through 12 weeks. Participants rated the intervention as highly acceptable on the CSQ-8 (M = 30.4/32.0, SD = 1.6). In qualitative interviews, participants reported that working with the therapist and setting values-based goals were helpful, while also recommending more tailoring to patients' needs and offering the program early in MOUD treatment. Preliminary efficacy data suggest the program was associated with small to moderate improvements in life satisfaction (Cohen's d = 0.25) and positive affect (d = 0.62), whereas there were no changes in depression (d = 0.09) or negative affect (d = -0.07) in a group with low depression at baseline. VBA adapted for patients on MOUD in primary care was feasible to deliver and acceptable to participants. Minor modifications to the target population and treatment manual could increase the program's impact. Future studies will test the efficacy of the intervention in improving quality of life and OUD treatment outcomes. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05262725, Unique ID: NCT05262725.

Relationship of hub and treatment characteristics with client outcomes in the initial Washington State hub and spoke cohort

IntroductionWashington State's Hub and Spoke (HS) approach aims to improve availability of opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment. Washington initially funded six hubs with expertise in medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) that built care networks with referral and treatment partners (spokes). We assessed outcomes for the initial HS cohort, considering the role of HS and treatment characteristics. MethodsWe conducted a cohort-based observational study using 2017–2019 Medicaid claims data for 2841 HS participants aged 18–64, excluding those with past-month MOUD, in an intent-to-treat analysis. We describe treatment characteristics (MOUD type, treatment setting, and hub type at the initial HS visit, number of outpatient services in their first HS month), and six-month outcomes (MOUD continuity, emergency department (ED) utilization, hospitalization, and intensive SUD treatment). We used multivariable regressions to assess associations with six-month outcomes, adjusting for client characteristics. ResultsTwo-thirds (68 %) of participants received buprenorphine, 22 % methadone, 5 % naltrexone, and 5 % outpatient without MOUD for their initial visit. Within six months, 45 % had an ED visit, 14 % any hospitalization, and 18 % entered intensive SUD treatment. Only 24 % remained on MOUD for six months. Compared to buprenorphine, the methadone sample had higher odds of MOUD continuity (aOR = 2.81, 95%CI 2.21–3.55), and the naltrexone sample had lower odds (aOR = 0.36, 95%CI 0.19–0.66). FQHC/public health treatment settings had higher odds of MOUD continuity (aOR = 1.70, 95%CI 1.17–2.47) but hub type was not significant. MOUD continuity increased with 2+ outpatient services for the buprenorphine sample (aOR range 2.55–4.73). Odds of intensive SUD treatment were lower for the methadone sample, compared to buprenorphine (aOR = 0.16, 95%CI 0.11–0.23), all settings compared to SUD settings (aOR range 0.32–0.58), and SUD + MH and medical/hospital hubs compared to SUD only hubs (aOR range 0.28–0.41). ConclusionsMost participants did not attain six-month MOUD continuity, despite the HS approach, with variations by MOUD type and treatment setting. The number of outpatient services in the first month for buprenorphine clients was associated with greater odds of MOUD continuity and reduced odds of intensive SUD treatment. More work is needed to improve MOUD continuity for people with OUD within the HS model.

Factors affecting problem-solving court team decisions about medications for opioid use disorder

BackgroundProblem-solving courts (PSCs) provide alternatives to prosecution and incarceration for drug-related crimes and offer integrated support for people who have lost custody of children due to drug use. Methadone and buprenorphine are lifesaving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) but are underused by PSC clients. Even when PSCs lack a court-level prohibition against MOUD, court staff still make individualized decisions about whether a court client can use MOUD. Therefore, we sought to identify factors involved in such individualized PSC court decisions about clients' use of MOUD. MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups between Summer and Fall 2022 with a convenience sample of 54 PSC staff members from 33 courts across four states. Data were analyzed using iterative categorization. ResultsInterviewees indicated that their courts had eliminated blanket prohibitions against MOUD due to federal and state policy funding requirements, widespread dissemination of voluntary best practice standards, fear of lawsuits, and MOUD education targeting courts. Courts allowed MOUD if the court client accessed it through a treatment provider with whom the court collaborates. Some courts only allowed court clients to access MOUD from non-partnering treatment providers after a court-led “vetting” process of the proposed MOUD provider. MOUD provider characteristics considered during the vetting process included the provider's willingness to communicate with the court, frequent drug testing, adjustments of medication or dosage in response to aberrant results, offering of counseling, and acceptance of Medicaid or sliding scale payments. PSC staff were least comfortable with court clients using methadone treatment. ConclusionsThe presence (or lack of) a PSC-MOUD partnership is a key factor involved in court staff decisions when a court client desires MOUD. Therefore, increasing the number of partnerships between PSCs and MOUD providers could lead to higher rates of MOUD utilization. It is unclear whether court-led vetting processes for non-partnering MOUD treatment providers are necessary or appropriate, and such vetting processes could reduce treatment choice or access in communities with few MOUD providers.

Attributes of higher- and lower-performing hospitals in the Consult for Addiction Treatment and Care in Hospitals (CATCH) program implementation: A multiple-case study

IntroductionSix hospitals within the New York City public hospital system implemented the Consult for Addiction Treatment and Care in Hospitals (CATCH) program, an interprofessional addiction consult service. A stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial tested the effectiveness of CATCH for increasing initiation and engagement in post-discharge medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment among hospital patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). The objective of this study was to identify facility characteristics that were associated with stronger performance of CATCH. MethodsThis study used a mixed methods multiple-case study design. The six hospitals in the CATCH evaluation were each assigned a case rating according to intervention reach. Reach was considered high if ≥50 % of hospitalized OUD patients received an MOUD order. Cross-case rating comparison identified attributes of high-performing hospitals and inductive and deductive approaches were used to identify themes. ResultsHigher-performing hospitals exhibited attributes that were generally absent in lower-performing hospitals, including (1) complete medical provider staffing; (2) designated office space and resources for CATCH; (3) existing integrated OUD treatment resources; and (4) limited overlap between the implementation period and COVID-19 pandemic. ConclusionsHospitals with attributes indicative of awareness and integration of OUD services into general care were generally higher performing than hospitals that had siloed OUD treatment programs. Future implementations of addiction consult services may benefit from an increased focus on hospital- and community-level buy-in and efforts to integrate MOUD treatment into general care.

Influences of the criminal justice system on use of medications for opioid use disorder: a qualitative study

BackgroundLegal-involved veterans with opioid use disorder (OUD) have lower receipt of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) than other veterans served at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). This qualitative study examined the influence of the criminal justice system on access to MOUD for legal-involved veterans in the U.S.MethodsVHA facilities (n = 14) that varied in their provision of MOUD to legal-involved veterans were selected for qualitative interviews. Interviewees included legal-involved veterans (n = 18), VHA Veterans Justice Programs Specialists (n = 15), substance use disorder treatment providers (n = 5), and criminal justice staff (n = 12). Team members applied codes to meaningful units of analysis (quotations) in the transcribed interviews. Using a matrix approach, team members created a spreadsheet matrix with codes, facility rate of MOUD, and relevant quotations summarized for each participant. Themes and connections between individual participants and cross-interview concepts were explored. Participants were not asked to provide feedback on the findings.ResultsThemes identified were as follows: (1) Veterans Treatment Court policies both enhanced and limited MOUD treatment access and utilization among participants; (2) cross-system collaboration strengths and challenges existed; and (3) criminal justice system treatment preferences and policies both enhanced and limited MOUD in jails and prisons.ConclusionsThe influence of the criminal justice system on MOUD has led to variable access to MOUD for legal-involved veterans. Our findings can help inform recommendations to enhance access to MOUD for veterans within the criminal justice system, including the development of a national database of MOUD education materials for Veterans Treatment Courts, strengthening community-court relationships, allowing individuals to use their own healthcare coverage within jails and prisons and extend Medicaid coverage into criminal justice settings, and applying national quality measures for MOUD to criminal justice settings and develop a national system for tracking these quality measures.

Buprenorphine prescription and treatment initiation through preemptive outreach and telehealth consultation with emergency medicine providers

Background Persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) urgently need improved access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and long-term treatment. Promising options include initiating buprenorphine in the emergency department (ED), telemedicine, and proactive treatment referrals before overdose events. Objective(s) We describe the process and outcomes of a novel referral path utilizing preemptive outreach and telemedicine to facilitate rapid access to MOUD and long-term treatment. Methods Participants were referred to telemedicine appointments with ED providers for buprenorphine initiation and to treatment agencies via an electronic referral network. Administrative data tracked participation at each stage of the process. Independent samples t-tests and chi-square tests assessed differences in process completion based on demographics. Results 163 persons with OUD or recent opioid overdose were referred, with high rates of participant follow-through, resulting in 126 new buprenorphine prescriptions and 114 linkages to long-term treatment. Of the 163 patients referred, 114 (69.9%) completed all steps. Participant demographics were not associated with significantly different completion rates. Conclusions This model serves as a viable pathway to link people to treatment resources and MOUD, and novelly combines prospective client outreach with telemedicine to reach persons before they arrive in the ED following an overdose. Future studies should examine the impact of similar programs on subsequent opioid use rates and treatment retention.

Distinct Trajectories of Prescription Opioid Exposure in Pregnancy and Risk of Adverse Birth Outcomes.

The aim of this study was to identify distinct trajectories of prescription opioid exposure in pregnancy-encompassing both medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and opioid analgesics-and explore their associations with birth outcomes. Trajectories were identified using latent class analysis among Wisconsin Medicaid-insured live births 2011-2019. Logistic regression estimated associations between these trajectories and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), small for gestational age, preterm birth, birth weight, and gestational age. Of 138,123 births, 27,293 (19.8%) had prenatal opioid exposure. Five trajectory classes were identified: (1) stable MOUD treatment (5.8%), (2) inconsistent MOUD treatment (3.9%), (3) chronic analgesic use (4.2%), (4) intermittent analgesic use (7.8%), and (5) low-level use of MOUD and analgesics (78.3%). NOWS incidence per 1000 infants was 667 for class 1 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 21.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.89, 26.41), 570 for class 2 (aOR: 15.35, 95% CI: 12.49, 18.87), 235 for class 3 (aOR: 19.42, 95% CI: 15.93, 23.68), 67 for class 4 (aOR: 6.23, 95% CI: 4.99, 7.76), and 12 for class 5 (aOR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.47, 2.02). Classes 1-4 had elevated risk of small for gestational age, preterm birth, lower birth weight, and shorter gestational age, with no significant differences among these classes. Among individuals with opioid use disorder, stable MOUD treatment was associated with higher birth weights and longer gestational ages compared to inconsistent treatment, despite higher odds of NOWS. Early initiation and consistent MOUD treatment may improve birth weight and gestational age. For pregnant individuals with opioid use disorder using chronic analgesics, transition to MOUD may promote birth outcomes.

Racial Differences in Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Initiation in a Carceral Setting.

The opioid overdose crisis significantly affects marginalized communities, with people of color experiencing higher rates of overdose and barriers to treatment. The syndemic of opioid use disorder and mass incarceration exacerbates racial health disparities. Some carceral facilities offer medication for addiction treatment, though no significant research explores differences in type of treatment uptake by race in these settings. This study focuses on the racial differences in medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) preferences among incarcerated individuals. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Rhode Island Department of Corrections (RIDOC), examining MOUD-type preferences (buprenorphine or methadone) among incarcerated individuals. The study utilized RIDOC electronic medical records from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2022, involving 3533 unique incarceration events. Participants were categorized by race (White vs non-White) and MOUD status (new initiation vs community continuation), with logistic regression models. The study found no direct racial disparity in preferences for MOUD type. However, an interaction between race and MOUD initiation status significantly influenced MOUD-type preference. Among those initiating MOUD during incarceration, non-White individuals were more likely to choose buprenorphine compared to their White counterparts. This research provides new insights into the intersection of race, incarceration, and MOUD preferences. While direct racial disparities in MOUD type were not observed, the analysis uncovered a notable interaction effect: race influences the relationship between MOUD initiation status and the selected MOUD treatment during incarceration. Specifically, data demonstrate that the likelihood of choosing buprenorphine varies significantly based on both racial background and whether the treatment was initiated during incarceration or in the community. Further research is needed in different geographic settings to understand the broader implications to help guide equitable healthcare delivery in jails and prisons.

Protocol of a randomized controlled trial examining psychosocial enhancement and standard medication treatment for co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders: A half fractional factorial randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe opioid epidemic disproportionately affects individuals with co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders (COD), who often have poor treatment engagement. Multicomponent treatment models are popular solutions to increase treatment access and engagement for those with COD. Maintaining Independence and Sobriety through Systems Integration, Outreach and Networking (MISSION) is a hybrid multicomponent linkage and treatment approach that provides assertive community outreach combined with psychosocial treatment. This protocol paper describes a randomized controlled trial comparing MISSION and medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), its multicomponent parts along with MOUD, and MOUD treatment as usual (TAU) to assess improvements in health and social outcomes. MethodsThis study will use a half fractional factorial design and randomize 1000 patients with COD to one of five treatment conditions: (1) the full MISSION intervention plus MOUD; (2–4) a combination of two out of three MISSION components plus MOUD; or (5) TAU. Secondary aims include examination of mechanisms of action, economic evaluation of the implementation of MISSION and/or its components plus MOUD versus TAU, and exploratory predictive modeling to match optimal MISSION parts with patient needs. DiscussionThis randomized controlled trial will help determine the effectiveness of MISSION (or its parts) and MOUD compared to TAU to improve engagement in treatment, substance use, and mental health symptoms. This trial is the first to compare MISSION and its parts with MOUD versus TAU in a real-world treatment scenario to determine which components are necessary and sufficient to drive treatment outcomes according to patient needs.

The Impact of High-Potency Synthetic Opioids on Pharmacotherapies for Opioid Use Disorder: A Scoping Review.

The clinical implications of high potency synthetic opioids (HPSO) on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs) are not well understood. Although pharmacological interactions are plausible, the clinical significance of such interaction has not been systematically elucidated. This scoping review investigates the relationship between HPSO exposure and various MOUD treatment outcomes. We followed PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) for scoping reviews with extensive a priori search strategy of databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane. From 9149 studies, 34 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Synthesized data reveal several critical insights: First, there is a variable but high occurrence (38%-80%) of HPSO usage among individuals with MOUDs. Second, MOUDs are linked to a decreased risk of overdoses and deaths associated with HPSO. Third, HPSO consumption is correlated with the risk of precipitated withdrawal when starting buprenorphine. Fourth, low-dose buprenorphine is being recognized as one method to avoid moderate withdrawal symptoms prior to treatment. Lastly, significant gaps exist in human experimental data concerning the effects of HPSO on key factors critical for treating OUD-craving, withdrawal symptoms, and pain. Current evidence supports MOUD safety and effectiveness in reducing nonmedical opioid use. Further research is needed to explore HPSO's influence on the acute factors preceding nonmedical opioid use, such as cravings, withdrawal symptoms, and pain. This research could inform the optimization of MOUD dosing strategies. Achieving consensus and harmonizing data across clinical and research protocols could diminish variability, enhancing our understanding of HPSOs effect on MOUD treatment outcomes.

Analyzing quality of life among people with opioid use disorder from the National Institute on Drug Abuse Data Share initiative: implications for decision making

PurposeWe aimed to estimate health state utility values (HSUVs) for the key health states found in opioid use disorder (OUD) cost-effectiveness models in the published literature.MethodsData obtained from six trials representing 1,777 individuals with OUD. We implemented mapping algorithms to harmonize data from different measures of quality of life (the SF-12 Versions 1 and 2 and the EQ-5D-3 L). We performed a regression analysis to quantify the relationship between HSUVs and the following variables: days of extra-medical opioid use in the past 30 days, injecting behaviors, treatment with medications for OUD, HIV status, and age. A secondary analysis explored the impact of opioid withdrawal symptoms.ResultsThere were statistically significant reductions in HSUVs associated with extra-medical opioid use (-0.002 (95% CI [-0.003,-0.0001]) to -0.003 (95% CI [-0.005,-0.002]) per additional day of heroin or other opiate use, respectively), drug injecting compared to not injecting (-0.043 (95% CI [-0.079,-0.006])), HIV-positive diagnosis compared to no diagnosis (-0.074 (95% CI [-0.143,-0.005])), and age (-0.001 per year (95% CI [-0.003,-0.0002])). Parameters associated with medications for OUD treatment were not statistically significant after controlling for extra-medical opioid use (0.0131 (95% CI [-0.0479,0.0769])), in line with prior studies. The secondary analysis revealed that withdrawal symptoms are a fundamental driver of HSUVs, with predictions of 0.817 (95% CI [0.768, 0.858]), 0.705 (95% CI [0.607, 0.786]), and 0.367 (95% CI [0.180, 0.575]) for moderate, severe, and worst level of symptoms, respectively.ConclusionWe observed HSUVs for OUD that were higher than those from previous studies that had been conducted without input from people living with the condition.

Addiction Consultation Services for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Initiation and Engagement

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are highly effective, but only 22% of individuals in the US with opioid use disorder receive them. Hospitalization potentially provides an opportunity to initiate MOUD and link patients to ongoing treatment. To study the effectiveness of interprofessional hospital addiction consultation services in increasing MOUD treatment initiation and engagement. This pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized implementation and effectiveness (hybrid type 1) trial was conducted in 6 public hospitals in New York, New York, and included 2315 adults with hospitalizations identified in Medicaid claims data between October 2017 and January 2021. Data analysis was conducted in December 2023. Hospitals were randomized to an intervention start date, and outcomes were compared during treatment as usual (TAU) and intervention conditions. Bayesian analysis accounted for the clustering of patients within hospitals and open cohort nature of the study. The addiction consultation service intervention was compared with TAU using posterior probabilities of model parameters from hierarchical logistic regression models that were adjusted for age, sex, and study period. Eligible participants had an admission or discharge diagnosis of opioid use disorder or opioid poisoning/adverse effects, were hospitalized at least 1 night in a medical/surgical inpatient unit, and were not receiving MOUD before hospitalization. Hospitals implemented an addiction consultation service that provided inpatient specialty care for substance use disorders. Consultation teams comprised a medical clinician, social worker or addiction counselor, and peer counselor. The dual primary outcomes were (1) MOUD treatment initiation during the first 14 days after hospital discharge and (2) MOUD engagement for the 30 days following initiation. Of 2315 adults, 628 (27.1%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 47.0 (12.4) years. Initiation of MOUD was 11.0% in the Consult for Addiction Treatment and Care in Hospitals (CATCH) program vs 6.7% in TAU, engagement was 7.4% vs 5.3%, respectively, and continuation for 6 months was 3.2% vs 2.4%. Patients hospitalized during CATCH had 7.96 times higher odds of initiating MOUD (log-odds ratio, 2.07; 95% credible interval, 0.51-4.00) and 6.90 times higher odds of MOUD engagement (log-odds ratio, 1.93; 95% credible interval, 0.09-4.18). This randomized clinical trial found that interprofessional addiction consultation services significantly increased postdischarge MOUD initiation and engagement among patients with opioid use disorder. However, the observed rates of MOUD initiation and engagement were still low; further efforts are still needed to improve hospital-based and community-based services for MOUD treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03611335.

Medication for Opioid Use Disorder After Serious Injection-Related Infections in Massachusetts

Serious injection-related infections (SIRIs) cause significant morbidity and mortality. Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) improves outcomes but is underused. Understanding MOUD treatment after SIRIs could inform interventions to close this gap. To examine rehospitalization, death rates, and MOUD receipt for individuals with SIRIs and to assess characteristics associated with MOUD receipt. This retrospective cohort study used the Massachusetts Public Health Data Warehouse, which included all individuals with a claim in the All-Payer Claims Database and is linked to individual-level data from multiple government agencies, to assess individuals aged 18 to 64 years with opioid use disorder and hospitalization for endocarditis, osteomyelitis, epidural abscess, septic arthritis, or bloodstream infection (ie, SIRI) between July 1, 2014, and December 31, 2019. Data analysis was performed from November 2021 to May 2023. Demographic and clinical factors potentially associated with posthospitalization MOUD receipt. The main outcome was MOUD receipt measured weekly in the 12 months after hospitalization. We used zero-inflated negative binomial regression to examine characteristics associated with any MOUD receipt and rates of treatment in the 12 months after hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were receipt of any buprenorphine formulation, methadone, and extended-release naltrexone examined individually. Among 8769 individuals (mean [SD] age, 43.2 [12.0] years; 5066 [57.8%] male) who survived a SIRI hospitalization, 4305 (49.1%) received MOUD, 5919 (67.5%) were rehospitalized, and 973 (11.1%) died within 12 months. Of those treated with MOUD in the 12 months after hospitalization, the mean (SD) number of MOUD initiations during follow-up was 3.0 (1.7), with 956 of 4305 individuals (22.2%) receiving treatment at least 80% of the time. MOUD treatment after SIRI hospitalization was significantly associated with MOUD in the prior 6 months (buprenorphine: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 16.51; 95% CI, 13.81-19.74; methadone: AOR, 28.46; 95% CI, 22.41-36.14; or naltrexone: AOR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.56-2.69). Prior buprenorphine (incident rate ratio [IRR], 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11-1.24) or methadone (IRR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.79-2.01) use was associated with higher treatment rates after hospitalization, and prior naltrexone use (IRR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.95) was associated with lower rates. This study found that in the year after a SIRI hospitalization in Massachusetts, mortality and rehospitalization were common, and only half of patients received MOUD. Treatment with MOUD before a SIRI was associated with posthospitalization MOUD initiation and time receiving MOUD. Efforts are needed to initiate MOUD treatment during SIRI hospitalizations and subsequently retain patients in treatment.

“Expected to happen”: perspectives on post-release overdose from recently incarcerated people with opioid use disorder

BackgroundOpioid-related overdose is the leading cause of death for people recently released from incarceration, however treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) during incarceration can reduce the mortality risk. This study seeks to qualitatively analyze perceptions of post-release overdose risk from the perspectives of people who received MOUD while incarcerated in one of eight Massachusetts jails during 2021–2022 using the Risk Environment Framework to guide analyses.MethodsN = 38 participants with lived experience of MOUD treatment during incarceration who are now living in the community were interviewed on factors that may contribute to or protect against post-release overdose risk. Themes were identified inductively and deductively using the Risk Environment Framework and its domains, which organizes themes along physical, social, economic, and policy environments on both the micro- and macro- scales.ResultsThe physical risk environment included loss of opioid tolerance during incarceration, polysubstance use, and the toxicity of the regional drug supply as key producers of increased risk for post-release overdose. Social drivers of risk included peer group risk norms—including peer-driven harm reduction practices and interpersonal relationships between drug sellers and buyers—as well as macro-level social determinants of health such as housing insecurity and availability of mental health services. Economic drivers of post-release overdose risk included lack of income generation during incarceration and employment challenges. Participants discussed several aspects of policy that contribute to post-release overdose risk, including availability of harm reduction supplies, public health services, and broader policy around MOUD.ConclusionsThe perspectives of people with lived experience are vital to understanding the disproportionate risks of overdose for those recently released from incarceration. Our results highlight the intersectional factors that produce and reproduce the post-release overdose risk environment, providing support for interventions across each domain of the Risk Environment Framework. By capturing perspectives from people with lived experience of OUD and incarceration during this critical period of risk, we can better identify interventions that target and mitigate overdose-related harm in this population.

Immediate Effects of Mindful Awareness in Body-oriented Therapy as an Adjunct to Medication for Opioid Use Disorder.

While effective, medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment outcomes can be limited by co-occurring polysubstance use, mental health and chronic pain conditions. Interoceptive training may facilitate well-being and support medication treatment for MOUD. This study examined the pre-post effects of the mindfulness-based intervention Mindful Awareness in Body-oriented Therapy (MABT) as an adjunct to MOUD. MABT teaches interoceptive awareness skills to promote self-care and emotion regulation. People stabilized on medication for OUD (N = 303) from 6 community clinics in Northwestern United States were recruited and randomly assigned to MABT plus MOUD or MOUD only. In a mixed-methods study, we used an intent-to-treat approach to examine the proportion of days abstinent from non-prescribed opioids, and other substance use (primary outcomes) at baseline and 3 months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included symptoms of mental health distress; emotional regulation difficulties; pain and physical symptom indicators; interoceptive awareness and mindfulness skills. Participant experience of MABT was collected through post-intervention surveys. Changes in outcomes were assessed using linear mixed models; content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. Levels of overall substance use were low and did not differ between groups. Significant improvements in PTSD symptoms, interoceptive awareness, pain severity, pain activity interference, and physical symptom frequency were found for those who received MABT compared to MOUD only. In this stable MOUD population, substance use outcomes were not improved, however MABT demonstrated significant positive changes across multiple health outcomes critical for improving MOUD treatment. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04082637 on 9/3/2019.

Association of primary care engagement with initiation and continuation of medication treatment for opioid use disorder among persons with a history of injection drug use

BackgroundFor patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), primary care can serve as a pathway to medication for OUD (MOUD). No community-based studies have examined whether people with OUD engaged in primary care are more likely to a) initiate or b) continue MOUD. MethodsData were collected 2014–2020 from two subsamples of the AIDS Linked to the Intravenous Experience (ALIVE) cohort, a community-recruited cohort of people from Baltimore who have injected drugs: 1) people who reported past-six-month illicit opioid use and no MOUD (360 participants, 789 study visits), and 2) people who reported MOUD and no illicit opioid use in the past six months (561 participants, 2027 visits). Logistic regression was used to estimate associations of past six-month self-reported primary care engagement, respectively, with a) initiating MOUD, b) continuing MOUD, and c) cessation from illicit opioid use without initiating MOUD. ResultsAmong 360 persons not on MOUD treatment (28 % female, 26 % under 50, 59 % actively injecting drugs), primary care engagement was not associated with either cessation from illicit opioid use or initiating MOUD. Similarly, among persons on MOUD (40 % female, 22 % under 50, 6 % actively injecting drugs) primary care engagement was not associated with continued treatment. ConclusionsOur findings implicate missed opportunities to initiate and maintain buprenorphine treatment in primary care settings.

Patient perceptions of and experiences with stigma using telehealth for opioid use disorder treatment: a qualitative analysis

BackgroundPatients with opioid use disorder (OUD) experience various forms of stigma at the individual, public, and structural levels that can affect how they access and engage with healthcare, particularly with medications for OUD treatment. Telehealth is a relatively new form of care delivery for OUD treatment. As reducing stigma surrounding OUD treatment is critical to address ongoing gaps in care, the aim of this study was to explore how telehealth impacts patient experiences of stigma.MethodsIn this qualitative study, we interviewed patients with OUD at a single urban academic medical center consisting of multiple primary care and addiction clinics in Oregon, USA. Participants were eligible if they had (1) at least one virtual visit for OUD between March 2020 and December 2021, and (2) a prescription for buprenorphine not exclusively used for chronic pain. We conducted phone interviews between October and December 2022, then recorded, transcribed, dual-coded, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsThe mean age of participants (n = 30) was 40.5 years (range 20–63); 14 were women, 15 were men, and two were transgender, non-binary, or gender-diverse. Participants were 77% white, and 33% had experienced homelessness in the prior six months. We identified four themes regarding how telehealth for OUD treatment shaped patient perceptions of and experiences with stigma at the individual (1), public (2–3), and structural levels (4): (1) Telehealth offers wanted space and improved control over treatment setting; (2) Public stigma and privacy concerns can impact both telehealth and in-person encounters, depending on clinical and personal circumstances; (3) The social distance of telehealth could mitigate or exacerbate perceptions of clinician stigma, depending on both patient and clinician expectations; (4) The increased flexibility of telehealth translated to perceptions of increased clinician trust and respect.ConclusionsThe forms of stigma experienced by individuals with OUD are complex and multifaceted, as are the ways in which those experiences interact with telehealth-based care. The mixed results of this study support policies allowing for a more individualized, patient-centered approach to care delivery that allows patients a choice over how they receive OUD treatment services.