Medicare Patients Research Articles

How Variable are Patient Comorbidity Profiles Among Practicing Otolaryngologists?

To determine whether certain groups of otolaryngologists (ORLs) are treating cohorts of patients with more comorbidities. Cross-sectional population-based analysis. 2019 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Dataset. Each ORL's average Medicare hierarchical condition category (HCC) risk score, a comorbidity index calculated from a patient's comorbidities, was collected. These were stratified and compared by various physician characteristics, including practice region and rurality, years in practice, gender, subspecialty, and setting (academic vscommunity). Among 8959 ORLs, the mean HCC risk score for Medicare patients was 1.35 ± 0.35. On univariate analysis, ORLs practicing in urban (compared to rural), ORLs in academic settings (compared to community), and early career ORLs all had a patient population with a higher HCC risk score (P < .001 for all). On multivariate analysis controlling for gender, rurality, graduation year, and region, rural setting was associated with decreased odds of having a high-risk patient population (odds ratio: 0.58 [95% confidence interval,CI: 0.48-0.71]; P < .001), while those more recently graduated has an increased risk (2000-2009: 1.41 [1.01-1.96], P = .046; 2010-2015: 2.30 [1.63-3.25], P < .001). In a separate subgroup analysis, subspecialty differences were seen and community setting was associated with decreased odds of having a high-risk patient population (0.36 [0.23-0.55]; P < .001). There is variability in patient comorbidity profiles among ORLs, with those in urban settings, those more recently graduated, and those in academic settings treating a group with more comorbidities. As the comorbidity burden may increase the cost of practice and complications, these findings may have important implications for health inequity.

Rx -to- OTC switch increased access and lowered cost of topical adapalene.

Topical adapalene gel is an effective and well tolerated acne treatment that transitioned from prescription to over-the-counter (OTC) availability in 2016. Historically, prescription to OTC transitions have lowered costs to patients and payers and increased access to medications. This study used sales and prescriber data to assess access to topical retinoid therapies and their costs in the pre- and post- Rx-to-OTC transition. We demonstrate that the prescription to OTC transition of adapalene gel increased access to this medication, while lowering costs to patients and payers, including Medicare patients. These results provide a necessary call to action for future OTC shifts with other high safety profile, well-tolerated medications in ultimate efforts and hopes of cost savings for patients, insurers, and Medicare within our healthcare industry.

3-Year Outcomes for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Repair in a Medicare Population.

Mitral valve repair (MVr) has become the standard therapy for degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR), but real-world late mortality, reintervention, and readmission data are lacking. This study estimates MVr outcomes for DMR to 3 years in the Medicare fee-for-service population. There were 4,219 DMR patients older than 65 years undergoing MVr within the Medicare 100% standard analytic file from October 2015 to December 2018 who were evaluated. Outcomes were analyzed for isolated MVr patients (n = 2,433) and patients undergoing MVr with certain concomitant procedures: MVr + tricuspid valve surgery (TVS; n = 619), MVr + cardiac ablation (CA; n = 540), and MVr + left atrial appendage closure (n = 627). Outcomes over a 3-year period included all-cause mortality, reintervention, rehospitalization, and common complications. All outcomes were modeled with adjustments for patient demographics and comorbid conditions. The average age for all patients was 71.9 ± 5.2 years. Adjusted all-cause mortality and MV reintervention (surgery or transcatheter) at 3 years for the primary cohort of isolated MVr was 3.5% and 1.6%, respectively. Directionally higher mortality at 3 years was observed in patients with concomitant TVS or CA. All-cause readmission and cardiac readmission for isolated MVr was 37.0% and 14.1%, with the highest rates for those with concomitant TVS or CA. Acute kidney injury and stroke/transient ischemic attack were the most common adverse events over 3 years for all patients. The 3-year mortality and reintervention rates in Medicare patients undergoing degenerative MVr are low. Those undergoing concomitant TVS or CA had directionally higher mortality and cardiac readmission rates. These results help refine outcome benchmarks as new transcatheter MVr procedures continue to emerge.

Persistent Inequities in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the United States: Results From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Despite its approval for acute ischemic stroke >25 years ago, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) remains underused, with inequities by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and geography. Little is known about IVT rates by insurance status. We assessed temporal trends from 2002 to 2015 in IVT for acute ischemic stroke in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample using adjusted, survey-weighted logistic regression. We calculated odds ratios for IVT for each category in 2002 to 2008 (period 1) and 2009 to 2015 (period 2). IVT use for acute ischemic stroke increased from 1.0% in 2002 to 6.8% in 2015 (adjusted annual relative ratio, 1.15). Individuals aged ≥85 years had the most pronounced increase during 2002 to 2015 (adjusted annual relative ratio, 1.18) but were less likely to receive IVT compared with 18- to 44-year-olds in period 1 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.23) and period 2 (aOR, 0.36). Women were less likely than men to receive IVT, but the disparity narrowed over time (period 1: aOR, 0.81; period 2: aOR, 0.94). Inequities in IVT resolved for Hispanic individuals in period 2 (aOR, 0.96) but not for Black individuals (period 2: aOR, 0.81). The disparity in IVT for Medicare patients, compared with privately insured patients, lessened over time (period 1: aOR, 0.59; period 2: aOR, 0.75). Patients treated in rural hospitals remained less likely to receive IVT than in urban hospitals; a more dramatic increase in urbanity widened the inequity (period 2, urban nonteaching versus rural: aOR, 2.58, period 2, urban teaching versus rural: aOR, 3.90). IVT for acute ischemic stroke increased among adults. Despite some encouraging trends, the remaining disparities highlight the need for intensified efforts at addressing inequities.

The association between weight loss medications and cardiovascular complications.

Obesity and its cardiovascular complications are major causes of morbidity and mortality. Little is known in real-world settings about the effect of newly approved antiobesity medications (AOMs) on cardiovascular complications among patients with obesity. This retrospective cohort study examined the association between newly approved AOM use and cardiovascular events among Medicare patients with obesity using data from 2020 to 2022. Patient age, gender, comorbidity scores, socioeconomic status, and baseline cardiovascular comorbidities were compared descriptively. Subgroup analysis compared variables by medication type. Relative risk and absolute risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events were estimated using Cox and Aalen regression models. The analysis included 5926 patients treated with semaglutide and tirzepatide, including Ozempic (5404 patients), Wegovy (375 patients), or Mounjaro (147 patients). Hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and hyperlipidemia were the most common comorbidities. For patients with AOMs, less incidence of heart failure (4.89% vs. 6.13%, p < 0.0001), atrial fibrillation (3.83% vs. 5.17%, p < 0.0001), arrhythmia (3.59% vs. 4.14%, p < 0.0153), and peripheral vascular disease (3.44% vs. 2.94%, p < 0.0395) was found versus patients without AOMs. Patients receiving AOMs showed an 8% risk reduction in any CVD. Protective effect on CVD was apparent over the first 375 days. Results suggest that utilization of AOMs effectively alleviates the high prevalence of CVD.

Abstract PO3-02-06: Predictive Factors for adjuvant radiation use in patients &amp;gt;70 years with pT1N0 HR+ breast cancers

Abstract Introduction: In 2004 the CALGB 9343 study reported that women &amp;gt;70 years of age with pT1NO hormone receptor positive breast cancer received no meaningful benefit from breast irradiation following lumpectomy. Although there was a modest reduction in local recurrence, there was no improvement in rates of mastectomy for local recurrence, distant metastases, 5-year overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival therefore concluding that it was reasonable to omit radiation therapy in this group. An update of the CALGB 9343 study in 2013 with 10-year follow-up came to the same conclusion. Previous analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the SEER database showed, however, that the majority of women with these characteristics were still receiving radiation therapy. We conducted this retrospective analysis from NCDB to identify factors associated with the use of radiation in this population. Methods: We reviewed the NCDB database and collected records of all breast cancer patients aged &amp;gt;70 years, who had hormone positive (HR+), pT1N0 disease between the years of 2004-2019. They were separated into radiation and non-radiation cohorts and then stratified based on ethnicity, age groups, insurance status, income quartiles, education quartiles, areas of residence, tumor size, comorbidities, diagnosis to treatment time, treatment facility type and geographic location. We then compared mortality between the two cohorts and completed a multivariate analysis to determine the demographic and clinical factors associated with the likelihood of receiving radiation. SAS was used for analysis and p-value &amp;lt; 0.05 was deemed as statistically significant. Results: 147,611 patients met the criteria of age &amp;gt; 70, pT1N0, HR+ treated with surgical lumpectomy. The majority of them were white, aged 70-75y, had Medicare, were in higher education and income quartiles and lived in metro areas (Table 1). 57.9% of the total study population received radiation. The possibility of receiving radiation decreased as age increased beyond 75 years. Uninsured patients, Medicare patients, those with comorbities, higher educational status as well as those who lived 20+ miles away from their treatment facility and treated at urban centers in central or south Atlantic areas were less likely to receive radiation. Those treated at Comprehensive community cancer programs and middle Atlantic areas were more likely to receive radiation. The possibility of radiation also progressively increased with tumor size. However, there were no differences observed when stratified by race, income status or chemotherapy use (Table 2). We also noted a small overall survival advantage for the radiation cohort (HR 0.77, p-value &amp;lt; 0.0001) which could be explained by the fact that patients without comorbidities were more likely to receive radiation. Discussion: Our results provide a real-world estimate of radiation use in pT1N0 HR+ early-stage breast cancer in women &amp;gt; 70 years. The major predictors of radiation use included younger age, low co-morbidities, insurance and institutions providing care. Lack of awareness about recent updates or concern about local recurrence could be contributing to the continued use of radiation. Although there are minor differences when stratified by demographics, it is concerning that the overall trend of radiation use has not significantly decreased over time. Since there is currently no data to support the routine use of radiation in this patient group as evidenced by randomized controlled trials, it is prudent to avoid radiation. This approach would help reduce healthcare costs, patient inconvenience and associated morbidity. Table 1 Baseline characteristics Table 2 Factors affecting radiation use Citation Format: Suma Sri Chennapragada, Runhua Shi, Shivani Sharma, Gary Burton. Predictive Factors for adjuvant radiation use in patients &amp;gt;70 years with pT1N0 HR+ breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-02-06.

Abstract PO1-01-10: Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of multigene assays for HR+/HER2- node-negative early-stage breast cancer in the US

Abstract Background Traditional clinico-pathologic features, such as tumor grade and size, age, and menopausal status, may provide incomplete prognostic information, and have limited ability to predict chemotherapy benefit for patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2)-, axillary lymph node-negative (N0) early-stage breast cancer, leading to both under- and over-treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. Multigene expression profile tests have been used in clinical practice to complement clinico-pathologic information to optimize treatment decisions. To date, the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence ScoreÒ test is the only multigene assay with the ability to predict chemotherapy benefit validated by evidence from randomized clinical trials and supported by NCCN and ASCO guidelines. Other commercially available assays in the US include MammaPrintÒ, EndoPredictÒ and Prosigna RORÒ, which offer prognostic information beyond traditional clinico-pathologic features to improve treatment decisions. The relative cost-effectiveness of the four multigene assays compared to using clinico-pathologic risk alone to guide chemotherapy decisions was assessed from a societal perspective in the US. Methods A cost-effectiveness model built in Microsoft Excel estimated the cost-effectiveness of the Oncotype DXÒ test, MammaPrint, EndoPredict and Prosigna ROR compared to using clinical-pathological risk alone over a lifetime horizon. The model structure consisted of a decision-tree portion informed using published studies for the distribution of distant recurrence risk categories as defined by each test (low, intermediate, and high risk for the Oncotype DX test and Prosigna ROR, low and high risk for MammaPrint and EndoPredict). Decision impact studies and clinical expert opinion informed the proportion of patients allocated to adjuvant chemotherapy conditional on test result category. A Markov discrete health state model then simulated the future risk of distant recurrence, and long-term adverse effects of chemotherapy: acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and congestive heart failure (CHF), and aggregated the costs and outcomes of treatment decisions over a patient’s lifetime. The probability of distant recurrence of breast cancer conditional on test result category was derived from the most up-to-date studies assessing the performance of tests: TAILORx for the Oncotype DX test, MINDACT for MammaPrint, and TransATAC for EndoPredict and Prosigna ROR. Costs were estimated from a US societal perspective in 2020 US dollars (including Medicare healthcare costs, lost productivity and patient out-of-pocket chemotherapy costs from literature), and outcomes were expressed in terms of life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and net monetary benefit (NMB). The cost-effectiveness of each multigene assay compared to using clinico-pathologic risk alone was presented using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results Using the Oncotype DX test resulted in the largest lifetime cost savings (-$13,395) and generated the largest QALY gain (0.25) out of the four multigene assays included in the model, when compared to using clinico-pathologic risk alone (Table 1). All four multigene assays represented a cost-effective use of resources from a societal perspective (based on the accepted willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained), with a low net lifetime cost or net cost savings with positive QALY gain. Conclusion These results support the use of multigene assays to guide treatment decisions in node-negative HR+/HER2- early-stage breast cancer to improve treatment outcomes, and also result in substantial net cost savings from a societal perspective. The prediction of chemotherapy benefit using the Oncotype DX test resulted in substantially higher cost savings and improved breast cancer outcomes. Citation Format: Vladislav Berdunov, Gebra Cuyun Carter, Christy Russell, Sara Campbell, Jennifer Racz, Yara Abdou. Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of multigene assays for HR+/HER2- node-negative early-stage breast cancer in the US [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-01-10.

Retrospective study investigating naloxone prescribing and cost in US Medicaid and Medicare patients

BackgroundOpioid overdoses in the USA have increased to unprecedented levels. Administration of the opioid antagonist naloxone can prevent overdoses.ObjectiveThis study was conducted to reveal the pharmacoepidemiologic patterns in naloxone prescribing...

Benefit Design And Biosimilar Coverage In Medicare Part D: Evidence And Implications From Recent Reforms.

There is substantial disparity between Medicare Part D and employer-sponsored health insurance plans in the coverage of biosimilars and their reference biologics. These disparities may be due to design elements of Part D plans that encourage the adoption of more expensive biologic drugs. We undertook several analyses to illustrate the dynamics of benefit design incentives over time, compare formulary coverage in Part D plans with that of employer-sponsored plans, and study how the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 affected Part D formulary coverage. Using these analyses of Part D reforms enacted through the Bipartisan Budget Act, we discuss the implications of elements of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 that will be implemented in 2025. Biosimilar coverage increased by 23percentage points five quarters after the Bipartisan Budget Act was implemented. We predict that the Inflation Reduction Act will also have a positive effect on biosimilar coverage. Given ample evidence of a relationship between drug coverage and utilization, our results suggest that Medicare patients and the federal government could realize substantial savings if Part D formularies resembled those of employer-sponsored plans.

Projections of Single-level and Multilevel Spinal Instrumentation Procedure Volume and Associated Costs for Medicare Patients to 2050.

Instrumented spinal fusions can be used in the treatment of vertebral fractures, spinal instability, and scoliosis or kyphosis. Construct-level selection has notable implications on postoperative recovery, alignment, and mobility. This study sought to project future trends in the implementation rates and associated costs of single-level versus multilevel instrumentation procedures in US Medicare patients aged older than 65 years in the United States. Data were acquired from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019. Procedure costs and counts were abstracted using Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify spinal level involvement. The Prophet machine learning algorithm was used, using a Bayesian Inference framework, to generate point forecasts for 2020 to 2050 and 95% forecast intervals (FIs). Sensitivity analyses were done by comparing projections from linear, log-linear, Poisson and negative-binomial, and autoregressive integrated moving average models. Costs were adjusted for inflation using the 2019 US Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index. Between 2000 and 2019, the annual spinal instrumentation volume increased by 776% (from 7,342 to 64,350 cases) for single level, by 329% (from 20,319 to 87,253 cases) for two-four levels, by 1049% (from 1,218 to 14,000 cases) for five-seven levels, and by 739% (from 193 to 1,620 cases) for eight-twelve levels (P < 0.0001). The inflation-adjusted reimbursement for single-level instrumentation procedures decreased 45.6% from $1,148.15 to $788.62 between 2000 and 2019, which is markedly lower than for other prevalent orthopaedic procedures: total shoulder arthroplasty (-23.1%), total hip arthroplasty (-39.2%), and total knee arthroplasty (-42.4%). By 2050, the number of single-level spinal instrumentation procedures performed yearly is projected to be 124,061 (95% FI, 87,027 to 142,907), with associated costs of $93,900,672 (95% FI, $80,281,788 to $108,220,932). The number of single-level instrumentation procedures is projected to double by 2050, while the number of two-four level procedures will double by 2040. These projections offer a measurable basis for resource allocation and procedural distribution.

Risk Versus Reward - Hospitals Incentivized More than Surgeons to Care for Riskier Arthroplasty Patients

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between risk and reimbursement for both surgeons and hospitals among Medicare patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). MethodsThe “2021-Medicare-Physician-and-Other-Provider” and “2021-Medicare-Inpatient-Hospitals” files were utilized. Patient comorbidity profiles were collected, including the mean patient-hierarchal-condition-category (HCC) risk score, which is a standardized metric accounting for comorbidities. Surgeon data included all primary TJA procedures (inpatient and outpatient) billed to Medicare in 2021, while hospital data included all inpatient episodes of primary TJA billed to Medicare in 2021. Surgeon and hospital reimbursements were collected. All episodes were split into a “sicker-cohort” with an HCC risk score of 1.5 or greater and a “healthier-cohort” with HCC risk scores less than 1.5. Variables were compared across cohorts. ResultsIn 2021, 386,355 primary total hip and knee arthroplasty procedures were billed to Medicare and were included. The mean surgeon reimbursement among the sicker cohort was $1,021.91, which was less than for the healthier cohort of $1,060.13 (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, for the hospital analysis, 112,012 Medicare patients were admitted as inpatients for primary TJA in 2021 and included. The mean reimbursement to hospitals was significantly greater for the sicker cohort at $13,950.66, compared to the healthier cohort of $8,430.46. For both the surgeon and hospital analyses, the sicker patient cohorts had a significantly higher rate of all comorbidities assessed (P < 0.001). ConclusionThis study demonstrates that mean surgeon reimbursement was lower for primary TJA among sicker patients in comparison to their healthier counterparts, while hospital reimbursement was higher for sicker patients. This represents a discrepancy in the incentivization of care for complex patients, as hospitals receive increased remuneration for taking on extra risk, while surgeons get paid less on average for performing TJA on sicker patients. Such data should inform future policy to assure continued access to arthroplasty care among complex patients.

Antibiotic Laden Bone Cement Does Not Reduce Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection Risk in Primary TKA

IntroductionPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be a serious complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A method believed to decrease the incidence of PJI is antibiotic laden bone cement (ALBC). Current clinical practice guidelines do not recommend ALBC in primary TKA. The purpose of this study was to compare ALBC to plain cement (PC) in preventing PJI in primary TKA. MethodsThis retrospective analysis included 109,242 Medicare patients in the American Joint Replacement Registry who underwent a cemented primary TKA from January 2017 to March 2021, and had at least one year of follow-up. Patients who received ALBC were compared to patients who received PC. Demographic and case-specific variables such as age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), anesthesia type, and operative time were used to create propensity scores. A logistic regression was run to predict the probability of receiving ALBC. Also, a multivariate model was run on the full unstratified population, using the same covariates as were used to create the propensity model. The primary outcome was differences in PJI rates. ResultsLogistic regression analysis showed that a higher preoperative diagnosis of osteoarthritis, higher CCI, higher BMI, women, race, and anesthesia requirements increased a patient’s probability of receiving ALBC. In the full unstratified multivariate model, ALBC did not show a statistically significant difference in risk of revision for infection compared to PC. Discussion/ConclusionThe use of ALBC in primary TKA has not been shown to be more efficacious in preventing PJI within the population of Medicare patients in the United States. However, this study is limited given it is a retrospective database study that may inherently have biases and the large dataset has a potential for overpowering the findings.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Medicare Beneficiaries

The influence of race and ethnicity on initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is relatively understudied in Medicare data. To investigate disparities in the initiation of DOACs compared with warfarin by race, ethnicity, and social vulnerability. This retrospective cohort study used a 50% sample of Medicare fee-for-service data from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019 (mean patient enrollment duration, 7.7 years). Analysis took place between January 2023 and February 2024. A cohort of older adults (aged ≥65 years) with atrial fibrillation who newly initiated warfarin or DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) was identified. Patients were classified as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic. The likelihood of starting use of DOACs compared with warfarin was modeled, adjusting for race, ethnicity, age, sex, county-level social vulnerability, and other clinical factors. Among 950 698 anticoagulation initiations, consisting of 680 974 DOAC users and 269 724 warfarin users (mean [SD] age, 78.5 [7.6] years; 52.6% female), 5.2% were Black, 4.3% were Hispanic, and 86.7% were White. During the 10-year study period, DOAC use increased for all demographic groups. After adjustment, compared with White patients, Black patients were 23% less likely (adjusted odds ratio [AOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.75-0.79) and Hispanic patients were 13% less likely (AOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85-0.89) to initiate DOAC use. Disparities in DOAC initiation were greatest among Black patients in the earlier years but attenuated during the study period. For instance, in 2010, the OR of Black patients initiating DOACs was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.50-0.57), attenuating linearly over time to 0.69 by 2013 (95% CI, 0.65-0.74) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78-0.89) by 2017. By 2019, these differences became nonsignificant (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.99-1.18). In this cohort study of Medicare patients with atrial fibrillation, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to initiate DOACs for atrial fibrillation, although these differences diminished over time. Identifying the factors behind these early disparities is crucial for ensuring equitable access to novel therapies as they emerge for Black and Hispanic populations.

Socioeconomic factors including patient income, education level and health insurance influence post-operative secondary surgery and hospitalization rates following hip arthroscopy

To evaluate a large cross-sectional sample of patients utilizing administrative database records, and analyze the effects of income, insurance type, and education level on outcomes after hip arthroscopy, including 2-year revision surgery, conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 90-day hospitalizations. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to query the PearlDiverTM Mariner database from October 2015 to January 2020 for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were categorized by mean family income in their zip code of residence (MFIR), health insurance type, and educational attainment in their zip code of residence (EAR). 2-year revision arthroscopy, conversion to THA and 90-day hospital readmissions or emergency department (ED) visits were analyzed along socioeconomic strata. Multivariate analysis of 33,326 patients revealed that patients with MFIR between $30,000-$70,000 had lower odds of 2-year revision arthroscopy [OR = 0.63, p < 0.001], THA conversion [OR= 0.76, p= 0.050], and 90-day readmission [OR= 0.53, p= 0.007] compared to MFIR >$100,000. Compared to patients with commercial insurance, patients with Medicare had lower odds of revision arthroscopy [OR= 0.60, p= 0.035] and THA conversion [OR= 0.46, p< 0.001], but greater odds of 90-day readmission [OR= 1.74, p= 0.007]. Patients with Medicaid had higher odds of 90-day ED visits [OR= 1.84, p< 0.001]. Patients with low EAR had higher odds of revision arthroscopy [OR= 1.42, p= 0.005] and THA conversion [OR= 1.58, p= 0.002] compared to those with high EAR. Following hip arthroscopy, patients residing in areas with lower mean family income were less likely to undergo reoperations and readmissions. Medicare patients showed lower reoperation but higher readmission odds, while Medicaid patients showed higher odds of ED visits. Additionally, higher educational attainment in the zip code of residence is protective against future reoperation. Level III. Retrospective Case Series.

Association of Patient Portal Messaging with Survival Among Radiation Oncology Patients

The shift to electronic health records has led to both patient portal messaging and large amounts of digital, real-world data for research. The objective of this study was to examine the association between portal messaging and survival among radiation oncology patients, using real-world data. This retrospective cohort study included patients at least 21 years old and seen by radiation oncology providers between January 14, 2014 and April 23, 2023 at XXXX. We developed Cox proportional hazards models for the outcome of death and examined factors associated with portal messaging using logistic regression models. Among 25,367 patients, the median age was 64 (interquartile range, 54-72), 13,175 (52%) were White, and 14,389 (57%) were male. Overall, as the first message in a thread, 8,986 (35%) patients sent messages to radiation oncology providers and 4,218 (17%) patients were sent messages from radiation oncology providers. Patients with head and neck or genitourinary malignancies were more likely than those with other diagnoses to send portal messages to and be sent portal messages from radiation oncology providers. Both patients sending portal messages to radiation oncology providers (Hazard Ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.84-0.96; P=0.001) and patients being sent messages from radiation oncology providers (HR, 0.77; CI, 0.70-0.84; P<0.001) as the first message in a thread were associated with survival after adjusting for socioeconomic, disease, and treatment characteristics. There were disparities among patients sending portal messages to radiation oncology providers including for Black versus White patients (Odds Ratio [OR], 0.60; CI, 0.51-0.69; P<0.001) and for Medicaid versus Medicare patients (OR, 0.70; CI, 0.62-0.79; P<0.001). There were also disparities among patients being sent portal messages by radiation oncology providers including for Black versus White patients (OR, 0.77; CI, 0.64-0.91; P=0.003), for Medicaid versus Medicare patients (OR, 0.76; CI, 0.65-0.89; P<0.001), and for patients with female versus male providers (OR, 1.47; CI 1.34-1.62; P<0.001). Sending portal messages to and being sent portal messages from radiation oncology providers were associated with better survival. Future studies should elucidate how best to support patient and provider engagement.

Area Vulnerability and Disparities in Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Area-level measures of sociodemographic disadvantage may be associated with racial and ethnic disparities with respect to receipt of treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) but have not been investigated previously, to our knowledge. To assess the association between area-level measures of social vulnerability and racial and ethnic disparities in the treatment of US Medicare beneficiaries with mRCC from 2015 through 2019. This retrospective cohort study included Medicare beneficiaries older than 65 years who were diagnosed with mRCC from January 2015 through December 2019 and were enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare Parts A, B, and D from 1 year before through 1 year after presumed diagnosis or until death. Data were analyzed from November 22, 2022, through January 26, 2024. Five different county-level measures of disadvantage and 4 zip code-level measures of vulnerability or deprivation and segregation were used to dichotomize whether an individual resided in the most vulnerable quartile according to each metric. Patient-level factors included age, race and ethnicity, sex, diagnosis year, comorbidities, frailty, Medicare and Medicaid dual enrollment eligibility, and Medicare Part D low-income subsidy (LIS). The main outcomes were receipt and type of systemic therapy (oral anticancer agent or immunotherapy from 2 months before to 1 year after diagnosis of mRCC) as a function of patient and area-level characteristics. Multivariable regression analyses were used to adjust for patient factors, and odds ratios (ORs) from logistic regression and relative risk ratios (RRRs) from multinomial logistic regression are reported. The sample included 15 407 patients (mean [SD] age, 75.6 [6.8] years), of whom 9360 (60.8%) were men; 6931 (45.0%), older than 75 years; 93 (0.6%), American Indian or Alaska Native; 257 (1.7%), Asian or Pacific Islander; 757 (4.9%), Hispanic; 1017 (6.6%), non-Hispanic Black; 12 966 (84.2%), non-Hispanic White; 121 (0.8%), other; and 196 (1.3%), unknown. Overall, 8317 patients (54.0%) received some type of systemic therapy. After adjusting for individual factors, no county or zip code-level measures of social vulnerability, deprivation, or segregation were associated with disparities in treatment. In contrast, patient-level factors, including female sex (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.84) and LIS (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.36-0.65), were associated with lack of treatment, with particularly limited access to immunotherapy for patients with LIS (RRR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.43). Associations between individual-level factors and treatment in multivariable analysis were not mediated by the addition of area-level metrics. Disparities by race and ethnicity were consistently and only observed within the most vulnerable areas, as indicated by the top quartile of each vulnerability deprivation index. In this cohort study of older Medicare patients diagnosed with mRCC, individual-level demographics, including race and ethnicity, sex, and income, were associated with receipt of systemic therapy, whereas area-level measures were not. However, individual-level racial and ethnic disparities were largely limited to socially vulnerable areas, suggesting that efforts to improve racial and ethnic disparities may be most effective when targeted to socially vulnerable areas.

Disparities in Access to Outpatient Surgery Related to Removal of Procedures from Medicare's Inpatient Only List.

We assessed the shift from inpatient to outpatient surgical care related to changes to the Inpatient Only List in 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019. The extent to which procedures shift from the inpatient to outpatient setting following removal from Medicare's Inpatient Only List is unknown. Many health systems also encouraged a shift from inpatient to outpatient surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Assessing the relative change in outpatient surgical utilization for procedures removed from the Inpatient Only List during COVID-19 would provide empirical data on whether reimbursement policy changes or inpatient capacity needs during the pandemic were more likely to shift care from the inpatient to outpatient setting. We used administrative data from the PINC AI Healthcare Database across 723 hospitals to determine the within-facility relative change in outpatient vs inpatient procedural volume in 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019 using a multivariable conditional fixed-effects Poisson regression model. We also assessed whether outpatient surgical utilization varied by race and ethnicity. Using a multivariable linear probability model, we assessed the absolute change in risk-adjusted 30-day complication, readmission, and mortality rates for inpatient and outpatient surgical procedures. In 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019 respectively, there was a 5.3% (95% CI, 1.4% to 9.5%) and 41.3% (95% CI 33.1% to 50.0%) relative increase in outpatient elective procedural volume. Outpatient procedural volume increased most significantly for hip replacement which was removed from the Inpatient Only List in 2020 (increase in outpatient surgical utilization of 589.3% (95% CI, 524.9% to 660.3%)). The shift to outpatient hip replacement procedures was concentrated among White patients; in 2021, hip replacement procedural volume increased by 271.1% (95% CI, 241.2% and 303.7%) for White patients and 29.5% (95% CI, 24.4% and 34.9%) for Black patients compared to 2019 levels. There were no consistent or large changes in 30-day complication, readmission, or mortality risk in 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019. There was a modest increase in elective outpatient surgeries and a pronounced increase in outpatient orthopedic surgeries which were removed from the Inpatient Only List during the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilization of outpatient surgical procedures was concentrated among White patients.

State Department of Motor Vehicles Reporting Mandates of Dementia Diagnoses and Dementia Underdiagnosis

With older drivers representing the fastest growing segment of the driver population and dementia prevalence increasing with age, policymakers face the challenge of balancing road safety and mobility of older adults. In states that require reporting a dementia diagnosis to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), individuals with dementia may be reluctant to disclose symptoms of cognitive decline, and clinicians may be reluctant to probe for those symptoms, which may be associated with missed or delayed diagnoses. To assess whether DMV reporting policies for drivers with dementia are associated with primary care clinicians' underdiagnosing dementia. This cross-sectional study used data from the 100% Medicare fee-for-service program and the Medicare Advantage plans from 2017 to 2019 on 223 036 primary care clinicians with at least 25 Medicare patients. Statistical analysis was performed from July to October 2023. State DMV reporting policies for drivers with dementia. The main outcome was a binary variable indicating whether the clinician underdiagnosed dementia or not. Each clinician's expected number of dementia cases was estimated using a predictive model based on patient characteristics. Comparing the estimation with observed dementia diagnoses identified clinicians who underdiagnosed dementia vs those who did not, after accounting for sampling errors. Four states have clinician reporting mandates, 14 have mandates requiring drivers to self-report dementia diagnoses, and 32 states and the District of Columbia do not have explicit requirements. Among primary care clinicians in states with clinician reporting mandates (n = 35 620), 51.4% were female, 91.9% worked in a metropolitan area, and 19.9% of the patient panel were beneficiaries dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. Among primary care clinicians in states with patient self-reporting mandates (n = 57 548), 55.7% were female, 83.1% worked in a metropolitan area, and 15.4% of the patient panel were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. Among clinicians in states without mandates, 55.7% were female, 83.0% worked in a metropolitan area, and 14.6% of the patient panel were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. Clinicians in states with clinician reporting mandates had an adjusted 12.4% (95% CI, 10.5%-14.2%) probability of underdiagnosing dementia compared with 7.8% (95% CI, 6.9%-8.7%) in states with self-reporting and 7.7% (95% CI, 6.9%-8.4%) in states with no mandates, an approximately 4-percentage point difference (P < .001). Results of this cross-sectional study of primary care clinicians suggest that mandatory DMV policies for clinicians to report patients with dementia may be associated with a higher risk of missed or delayed dementia diagnoses. Future research is needed to better understand the unintended consequences and the risk-benefit tradeoffs of these policies.

The Impact Of Telemedicine On Medicare Utilization, Spending, And Quality, 2019-22.

Telemedicine use remains substantially higher than it was before the COVID-19 pandemic, although it has fallen from pandemic highs. To inform the ongoing debate about whether to continue payment for telemedicine visits, we estimated the association of greater telemedicine use across health systems with utilization, spending, and quality. In 2020, Medicare patients receiving care at health systems in the highest quartile of telemedicine use had 2.5 telemedicine visits per person (26.8percent of visits) compared with 0.7 telemedicine visits per person (9.5percent of visits) in the lowest quartile of telemedicine use. In 2021-22, relative to those in the lowest quartile, Medicare patients of health systems in the highest quartile had an increase of 0.21 total outpatient visits (telemedicine and in-person) per patient per year (2.2percent relative increase), a decrease of 14.4 annual non-COVID-19 emergency department visits per 1,000 patients per year (2.7percent relative decrease), a $248 increase in per patient per year spending (1.6percent relative increase), and increased adherence for metformin and statins. There were no clear differential changes in hospitalizations or receipt of preventive care.

Are Medicaid and Medicare Patients Treated Equally?

Are Medicaid and Medicare Patients Treated Equally?