Medical Therapy For Heart Failure Research Articles

Qiliqiangxin Alleviates Imbalance of Inflammatory Cytokines in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Qiliqiangxin (QLQX) capsule- a traditional Chinese medicine used for treating heart failure (HF), can modulate inflammatory cytokines in rats with myocardial infarction. However, its immune-regulating effect on dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether QLQX has a unique regulatory role in the imbalance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in patients with DCM. The QLQX-DCM is a randomized- double-blind trial conducted at 24 tertiary hospitals in China. A total of 345 patients with newly diagnosed virus-induced DCM were randomly assigned to receive QLQX capsules or placebo while receiving optimal medical therapy for HF. The primary endpoints were changes in plasma inflammatory cytokines and improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd) over the 12-month treatment. At the 12-month follow-up, the levels of IFN-γ, IL-17, TNF-α, and IL-4 decreased significantly, while the level of IL-10 increased in both groups compared with baselines (all P<0.0001). Furthermore-these changes, coupled with improvements in LVEF, NT-proBNP and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, excluding the LVEDd in the QLQX group, were greater than those in the placebo group (all P<0.001). Additionally, compared with placebo, QLQX treatment also reduced all-cause mortality and rehospitalization rates by 2.17% and 2.28%, respectively, but the difference was not statistically significant. QLQX has the potential to alleviate the imbalance of inflammatory cytokines in patients with DCM, potentially leading to further improvements in cardiac function when combined with anti-HF standard medications.

Pulmonary artery banding in infants and young children with end-stage left ventricular dilated cardiomyopathy-Cohort Study.

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is the most common cardiomyopathy and 40-50% patients may die or need heart transplant in 5 years after diagnosis. Although heart transplantation being the most effective life-saving option of end-stage DCM, scarcity of donors and series of complications prevent many patients from receiving timely treatment. Pulmonary artery banding (PAB) is recently described as an alternative strategy for end-stage DCM, with low left ventricular function (LVEF) but preserved right ventricular function, may potentially restore heart function and delay the need for heart transplantation, but current clinical evidence is still insufficient. On the other hand, the medication treatment of DCM in pediatric patients is mostly based on the experience of adults. It remains unclear whether PAB combing medication treatment could benefit infants and young children patients. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term efficacy of PAB combined with medication therapy in infants and young children with end stage DCM, comparing with medication therapy alone. This is a retrospective analysis of 18 consecutive pediatric patients aged ranging from 1 month to 44 months old who diagnosed with end-stage DCM (LVEF30%) with preserved right ventricular function between 2019 and 2023 in our hospital. All patients had been treated with conventional medications for two months. Then they were divided in two groups: PAB surgery group (6/18), and non-surgery group (12/18). Regardless of whether surgery was performed, both groups continued to receive medication treatment. Recovery of ventricular function was primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included 180-day mortality and severe heart failure (LVEF≤30%). We found there were no differences in age, weight, height, BMI, renal function, liver function, pulmonary hypertension, tricuspid valve regurgitation, mitral valve regurgitation and genetic abnormalities between those with and without PAB surgery. Comparing with non-surgery group, 5 patients in surgery group regain the normal cardiac ejection fraction (LVEF≥50%) (5/6, 83.3% vs. 4/12, 33.3%, P=0.131). A total of 3 patients had sudden death in non-surgery group, and there was no death in surgery group (P=0.180). 5 patients (5/12, 41.7%) still remain the low heart failure (LVEF≤40%) after 6 months of enrollment only given medical therapy, and none of patients present with LVEF≤40% in PAB surgery group (0/6, 0% vs. 8/12, 67.7%, P=0.034). Pulmonary artery banding is safe and effective in infants and young children with end-stage DCM with preserved right ventricular function. Combined with conventional heart failure medication therapy, it may provide short-term benefits post-operatively, decrease the cardiogenic shock, and act as a bridge to recovery and potentially reduce the need for heart transplantation. Long-term effects remain further observation, and larger randomized controlled trials would be more persuasive in validating its efficacy.

Learnings from the 2024 Utah Cardiac Recovery Symposium: A Roadmap for the Field of Myocardial Recovery.

The 12th annual Utah Cardiac Recovery Symposium (U-CARS) in 2024 continued its mission to advance cardiac recovery by uniting experts across various fields. The symposium featured key presentations on cutting-edge topics such as CRISPR gene editing for heart failure, guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure (HF) with improved/recovered ejection fraction (HFimpEF), the role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in treating cardiac arrest, and others. Discussions explored genetic and metabolic contributions to HF, emphasized the importance of maintaining pharmacotherapy in HFimpEF to prevent relapse, and identified future research directions including refining ECPR protocols, optimizing patient selection, and leveraging genetic insights to enhance therapeutic strategies.

Rapid and Intensive Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for Heart Failure: 5 Core Principles.

Rapid and Intensive Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for Heart Failure: 5 Core Principles.

HeartFailure Specialist Care and Long-Term Outcomes for Patients Admitted With Acute HeartFailure.

For patients with acute heart failure (HF), specialist HF care during admission improves diagnosis and treatments. The authors aimed to investigate the association of HF specialist care with in-hospital and longer term prognosis. The authors used data from the National HeartFailure Audit from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022, linked to electronic records for hospitalization and deaths. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome measure and in-hospital mortality the secondary outcome measure. Data for 227,170 patients admitted to hospital with HF (median age: 81 years; IQR: 72-88 years), were analyzed. Approximately 80% of acute HF admissions received support from HF specialists. Thirty-nine percent of patients (n=70,720) were seen by a multidisciplinary team (HF physicians and HF specialist nurses [HFSNd]), 22% (n=40,330) were seen by HFSNs alone, and the remaining 39% (n=71,700) were seen exclusively by specialist HF physicians. At discharge, more patients who received HF specialist care were prescribed medical therapy for HF and had specialized follow-up. Conversely, diuretic agents were prescribed to fewer patients. HF specialist care was independently associated with a higher rate of prescribing HF therapies at discharge and a lower likelihood of receiving diuretic therapy (OR: 0.90 [95%CI: 0.86-0.95]; P< 0.001). HF specialist care was associated with better long-term survival (HR: 0.89 [95%CI: 0.87-0.90]; P< 0.001) and lower in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.92 [95%CI: 0.0.88-0.97]; P<0.001). Receiving HF specialist care during admission for HF is associated with a higher rate of implementation of medical therapy, fewer discharges on diuretic therapy, and lower in-hospital and long-term mortality across the left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum, especially for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by New York Heart Association Class: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.

Data on the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with severe heart failure symptoms are limited. We investigated the relative effects of CRT in patients with ambulatory New York Heart Association (NYHA) IV versus III functional class at the time of device implantation. In this meta-analysis, we pooled patient-level data from the MIRACLE (Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation), MIRACLE-ICD (Multicenter InSync Implantable Cardioversion Defibrillation Randomized Clinical Evaluation), and COMPANION (Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure) trials. Outcomes evaluated were time to the composite end point of the first heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality, and time to all-cause mortality alone. The association between CRT and outcomes was evaluated using a Bayesian hierarchical Weibull survival regression model. We assessed if this association differed between NYHA III and IV groups by adding an interaction term between CRT and NYHA class as a random effect. A sensitivity analysis was performed by including data from RAFT (Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure). Our pooled analysis included 2309 patients. Overall, CRT was associated with a longer time to heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.79 [95% credible interval [CI], 0.64-0.99]; posterior probability or P=0.044), with a similar association with time to all-cause mortality (aHR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.59-1.03]; P=0.083). Associations of CRT with outcomes were not significantly different for those in NYHA III and IV classes (ratio of aHR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.30-1.27]; P=0.23 for heart failure hospitalization/mortality; ratio of aHR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.35-1.34]; P=0.27 for all-cause mortality alone). The sensitivity analysis, including RAFT data, did not show a significant relative CRT benefit between NYHA III and IV classes. Overall, there was no significant difference in the association of CRT with either outcome for patients in NYHA functional class III compared with functional class IV.

Diuretic Treatment in Heart Failure: A Practical Guide for Clinicians.

Congestion and fluid retention are the hallmarks of decompensated heart failure and the major reason for the hospitalization of patients with heart failure. Diuretics have been used in heart failure for decades, and they remain the backbone of the contemporary management of heart failure. Loop diuretics is the preferred diuretic, and it has been given a class I recommendation by clinical guidelines for the relief of congestion symptoms. Although loop diuretics have been used virtually among all patients with acute decompensated heart failure, there is still very limited clinical evidence to guide the optimized diuretics use. This is a sharp contrast to the rapidly growing evidence of the rest of the guideline-directed medical therapy of heart failure and calls for further studies. The loop diuretics possess a unique pharmacology and pharmacokinetics that lay the ground for different strategies to increase diuretic efficiency. However, many of these approaches have not been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. In recent years, a stepped and protocolized diuretics dosing has been suggested to have superior benefits over an individual clinician-based strategy. Diuretic resistance has been a major challenge to decongestion therapy for patients with heart failure and is associated with a poor clinical prognosis. Recently, therapy options have emerged to help overcome diuretic resistance to loop diuretics and have been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the pharmacology and clinical use of loop diuretics in the context of heart failure, with attention to its side effects, and adjuncts, as well as the challenges and future direction.

Use of heart failure medical therapy before and after a cancer diagnosis: A longitudinal study.

We aim to evaluate change in the use of prognostic guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMTs) for heart failure (HF) before and after a cancer diagnosis as well as the matched non-cancer controls, including renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors (RASIs), beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). We conducted a longitudinal study in patients with HF in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 2005 and 2021. We selected patients with probable HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) based on diagnostic and prescription records. We described the longitudinal trends in the use and dosing of GDMTs before and after receiving an incident cancer diagnosis. HF patients with cancer were matched with a 1:1 ratio to HF patients without cancer to investigate the association between cancer diagnosis and treatment adherence, persistence, initiation, and dose titration as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariable logistic regression models. Of 8504 eligible HFrEF patients with incident cancer, 4890 were matched to controls without cancer. The mean age was 75.7 (±8.4) years and 73.9% were male. In the 12months following a cancer diagnosis, patients experienced reductions in the use and dosing of GDMT. Compared with the non-cancer controls, patients with cancer had higher risks for poor adherence for all three medication classes (RASIs: OR=1.51, 95% CI=1.35-1.68; beta-blockers: OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.08-1.37; MRAs: OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.08-1.59) and poor persistence (RASIs: OR=2.04, 95% CI=1.75-2.37; beta-blockers: OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.12-1.63; MRAs: OR=1.49, 95% CI=1.16-1.93), and higher risks for dose down-titration for RASIs (OR=1.69, 95% CI=1.40-2.04) and beta-blockers (OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.05-1.62). Cancer diagnosis was not associated with treatment initiation or dose up-titration. Event rates for HF hospitalization and mortality were higher in patients with poor adherence or persistence to GDMTs. Following a cancer diagnosis, patients with HFrEF were more likely to have reduced use of GDMTs for HF.

Total artificial heart: past, present, and future

Every year, approximately 5 out of 1000 patients receive a diagnosis of advanced heart failure, with a prevalence of 1-2% in the adult population. This figure is likely underestimated, considering undiagnosed cases. Despite significant progress in medical therapy for heart failure, mortality rates persist around 20% within the first year, reaching 50-60% at 5 years from the initial diagnosis. For patients with severe end-stage heart failure, the 1-year mortality rate can reach up to 70%. Heart transplantation remains the preferred treatment for terminal stages of the disease; however, the significant challenge lies in the mismatch between available donors and recipients. Given this dilemma, both short-term solutions including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and long-term options such as left ventricular assist devices have gained prominence. These mechanical circulatory support systems become crucial for patients in critical conditions, temporarily ineligible for heart transplantation, such as those with severe irreversible pulmonary hypertension or acute organ failure. Despite these advancements, a growing number of patients on the waiting list develops severe biventricular dysfunction, precluding the use of a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant. In such cases, a total artificial heart emerges as a viable therapeutic option.

Implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure.

Implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure.

Ertugliflozin for Functional Mitral Regurgitation Associated With Heart Failure: EFFORT Trial.

The morbidity and mortality rates of patients with heart failure (HF) and functional mitral regurgitation (MR) remain substantial despite guideline-directed medical therapy for HF. We evaluated the efficacy of ertugliflozin for reduction of functional MR associated with HF with mild to moderately reduced ejection fraction. The EFFORT trial (Ertugliflozin for Functional Mitral Regurgitation) was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial to examine the hypothesis that the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor ertugliflozin is effective for improving MR in patients with HF with New York Heart Association functional class II or III, 35%≤ejection fraction<50%, and effective regurgitant orifice area of chronic functional MR >0.1 cm2 on baseline echocardiography. We randomly assigned 128 patients to receive either ertugliflozin or placebo in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy for HF. The primary end point was change in effective regurgitant orifice area of functional MR from baseline to the 12-month follow-up. Secondary end points included changes in regurgitant volume, left ventricular (LV) volume indices, left atrial volume index, LV global longitudinal strain, and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). The treatment groups were generally well-balanced with regard to baseline characteristics: mean age, 66±11 years; 61% men; 13% diabetes; 51% atrial fibrillation; 43% use of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor; ejection fraction, 42±8%; and effective regurgitant orifice area, 0.20±0.12 cm2. The decrease in effective regurgitant orifice area was significantly greater in the ertugliflozin group than in the placebo group (-0.05±0.06 versus 0.03±0.12 cm2; P<0.001). Compared with placebo, ertugliflozin significantly reduced regurgitant volume by 11.2 mL (95% CI, -16.1 to -6.3; P=0.009), left atrial volume index by 6.0 mL/m2 (95% CI, -12.16 to 0.15; P=0.005), and LV global longitudinal strain by 1.44% (95% CI, -2.42% to -0.46%; P=0.004). There were no significant between-group differences regarding changes in LV volume indices, ejection fraction, or NT-proBNP levels. Serious adverse events occurred in one patient (1.6%) in the ertugliflozin group and 6 (9.2%) in the placebo group (P=0.12). Among patients with functional MR associated with HF, ertugliflozin significantly improved LV global longitudinal strain and left atrial remodeling, and reduced functional MR. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors may be considered for patients with functional MR. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04231331.

A Case-based Implementation of Heart Failure Therapies, a Consensus Pathway by the Saudi Heart Failure Working Group.

The implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in heart failure (HF) has many challenges in real-world clinical practice. The consensus document is written considering the variability of the clinical presentation of HF patients. HF medical therapies need frequent dose adjustment during hospital admission or when patients develop electrolyte imbalance, acute kidney injury, and other acute illnesses. The paper describes clinical scenarios and graphs that will aid the managing physicians in decision-making for HF therapy optimization.

Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Survival After TEER for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation With Right Ventricular Impairment

BackgroundRight ventricular impairment is common among patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). Adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure is poor in these patients. ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of GDMT on long-term survival in this patient cohort. MethodsWithin the EuroSMR (European Registry of Transcatheter Repair for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation) international registry, we selected patients with SMR and right ventricular impairment (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion ≤17 mm and/or echocardiographic right ventricular–to–pulmonary artery coupling <0.40 mm/mm Hg). Titrated guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMTtit) was defined as a coprescription of 3 drug classes with at least one-half of the target dose at the latest follow-up. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 6 years. ResultsAmong 1,213 patients with SMR and right ventricular impairment, 852 had complete data on medical therapy. The 123 patients who were on GDMTtit showed a significantly higher long-term survival vs the 729 patients not on GDMTtit (61.8% vs 36.0%; P < 0.00001). Propensity score–matched analysis confirmed a significant association between GDMTtit and higher survival (61.0% vs 43.1%; P = 0.018). GDMTtit was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.39-0.93; P = 0.02 for patients on GDMTtit vs those not on GDMTtit). Its association with better outcomes was confirmed among all subgroups analyzed. ConclusionsIn patients with right ventricular impairment undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for SMR, titration of GDMT to at least one-half of the target dose is associated with a 40% lower risk of all-cause death up to 6 years and should be pursued independent of comorbidities.

Titration of Medications After Acute Heart Failure Is Safe, Tolerated, and Effective Regardless of Risk

BackgroundGuideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) decisions may be less affected by single patient variables such as blood pressure or kidney function and more by overall risk profile. In STRONG-HF (Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure), high-intensity care (HIC) in the form of rapid uptitration of heart failure (HF) GDMT was effective overall, but the safety, tolerability and efficacy of HIC across the spectrum of HF severity is unknown. Evaluating this with a simple risk-based framework offers an alternative and more clinically translatable approach than traditional subgroup analyses. ObjectivesThe authors sought to assess safety, tolerability, and efficacy of HIC according to the simple, powerful, and clinically translatable MAGGIC (Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic) HF risk score. MethodsIn STRONG-HF, 1,078 patients with acute HF were randomized to HIC (uptitration of treatments to 100% of recommended doses within 2 weeks of discharge and 4 scheduled outpatient visits over the 2 months after discharge) vs usual care (UC). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or first HF rehospitalization at day 180. Baseline HF risk profile was determined by the previously validated MAGGIC risk score. Treatment effect was stratified according to MAGGIC risk score both as a categorical and continuous variable. ResultsAmong 1,062 patients (98.5%) with complete data for whom a MAGGIC score could be calculated at baseline, GDMT use at baseline was similar across MAGGIC tertiles. Overall GDMT prescriptions achieved for individual medication classes were higher in the HIC vs UC group and did not differ by MAGGIC risk score tertiles (interaction nonsignificant). The incidence of all-cause death or HF readmission at day 180 was, respectively, 16.3%, 18.9%, and 23.2% for MAGGIC risk score tertiles 1, 2, and 3. The HIC arm was at lower risk of all-cause death or HF readmission at day 180 (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.50-0.86) and this finding was robust across MAGGIC risk score modeled as a categorical (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.62-0.68 in tertiles 1, 2, and 3; interaction nonsignificant) for all comparisons and continuous (interaction nonsignificant) variable. The rate of adverse events was higher in the HIC group, but this observation did not differ based on MAGGIC risk score tertile (interaction nonsignificant). ConclusionsHIC led to better use of GDMT and lower HF-related morbidity and mortality compared with UC, regardless of the underlying HF risk profile. (Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Rapid Optimization, Helped by NT-proBNP testinG, of Heart Failure Therapies [STRONG-HF]; NCT03412201)

Differences in provider approach to initiating and titrating guideline directed medical therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

BackgroundDespite the strong evidence supporting guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), prescription rates in clinical practice are still lacking.MethodsA survey containing 20 clinical vignettes of patients with HFrEF was answered by a national sample of 127 cardiologists and 68 internal/family medicine physicians. Each vignette had 4–5 options for adjusting GDMT and the option to make no medication changes. Survey respondents could only select one option. For analysis, responses were dichotomized to the answer of interest.ResultsCardiologists were more likely to make GDMT changes than general medicine physicians (91.8% vs. 82.0%; OR 1.84 [1.07–3.19]; p = 0.020). Cardiologists were more likely to initiate beta-blockers (46.3% vs. 32.0%; OR 2.38 [1.18–4.81], p = 0.016), angiotensin receptor blocker/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) (63.8% vs. 48.1%; OR 1.76 [1.01–3.09], p = 0.047), and hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate (HYD/ISDN) (38.2% vs. 23.7%; OR 2.47 [1.48–4.12], p < 0.001) compared to general medicine physicians. No differences were found in initiating angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARBs), initiating mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), sodium-glucose transporter protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, digoxin, or ivabradine.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate cardiologists were more likely to adjust GDMT than general medicine physicians. Future focus on improving GDMT prescribing should target providers other than cardiologists to improve care in patients with HFrEF.

Cost-Effectiveness of Medical Therapy for Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction

BackgroundThree medications are now guideline-recommended treatments for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF), however, the cost-effectiveness of these agents in combination has yet to be established. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in individuals with HFmrEF/HFpEF. MethodsUsing a 3-state Markov model, we performed a cost-effectiveness study using simulated cohorts of 1,000 patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF. Treatment with 1-, 2-, and 3-drug combinations was modeled. Based on a United States health care sector perspective, outcome data was used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2023 United States dollars based on a 30-year time horizon. ResultsTreatment with MRA, MRA+SGLT2i, and MRA+SGLT2i+ARNI therapy resulted in an increase in life years of 1.04, 1.58, and 1.80 in the HFmrEF subgroup, respectively, and 0.99, 1.54, and 1.77 in the HFpEF subgroup, respectively, compared with placebo. At a yearly cost of $18, MRA therapy resulted in ICERs of $10,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in both subgroups. The ICER for the addition of SGLT2i therapy ($4,962 per year) was $113,000 per QALY in the HFmrEF subgroup and $141,000 in the HFpEF subgroup. The addition of ARNI therapy ($5,504 per year) resulted in ICERs >$250,000 per QALY in both subgroups. If SGLT2i and ARNI were available at generic pricing the ICERs become <$10,000 per QALY in both EF subgroups. Outcomes were highly sensitive to assumed benefit in cardiovascular death. ConclusionsFor patients with heart failure, MRA was of high value, SGLT2i was of intermediate value, and ARNI was of low value in both HFmrEF and HFpEF subgroups. For patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF increased use of MRA and SGLT2i therapies should be encouraged and be accompanied with efforts to lower the cost of SGLT2i and ARNI therapies.

How Did We Score? Evaluating the Utility of a Score-Based System for Heart Failure Medical Therapy.

How Did We Score? Evaluating the Utility of a Score-Based System for Heart Failure Medical Therapy.

Management of Heart Failure in a Resource-Limited Setting: Expert Opinion from India.

Heart failure poses a global health challenge affecting millions of individuals, and access to guideline-directed medical therapy is often limited. This limitation is frequently attributed to factors such as drug availability, slow adoption, clinical inertia, and delayed diagnosis. Despite international recommendations promoting the use of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure management, personalized approaches are essential in settings with resource constraints. In India, crucial treatments like angiotensin II receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitors and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors are not fully utilized despite their established safety and efficacy. To address this issue, an expert consensus involving 150 specialists, including cardiologists, nephrologists, and endocrinologists, was convened. They deliberated on patient profiles, monitoring, and adverse side effects and provided tailored recommendations for guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure management. Stressing the significance of early initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy in patientswith heart failure, especially with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, the consensus also explored innovative therapies like vericiguat. To improve heart failure outcomes in resource-limited settings, the experts proposed several measures, including enhanced patient education, cardiac rehabilitation, improved drug access, and reforms in healthcare policies.

Oral nutritional supplements in older outpatients with heart failure: rationale and design of the ALIMENT-HF trial.

The ALIMENT-HF trial aims to determine whether high-calorie and high-protein oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are safe and beneficial for older adult outpatients with heart failure (HF). This multicentre, single-arm, interventional pilot trial is designed to evaluate the tolerance, efficacy, and safety of ONS in older adult outpatients with chronic HF, malnutrition, and anorexia. In total, 80 outpatients with HF regardless of their left ventricular ejection fraction will be treated with ONS, including high-energy (900kcal/day) and high protein (36g/day) supplementation, at eight sites in Japan. Inclusion criteria are as follows: age, ≥65years; outpatients receiving maximally tolerated guideline-directed medical therapy for HF and without change in their diuretic dosage during the last 3months; outpatients at risk of malnutrition, defined as a Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool score ≥1 point, and anorexia, defined using a Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire for the Japanese Elderly (SNAQ-JE) score of ≤14 points. Nutritional intervention will continue for up to 120days, with an observational period lasting for a further 60days. The primary outcome is a change in body weight between baseline and day 120. The ALIMENT-HF trial will evaluate the tolerance, efficacy, and safety of high-calorie and high-protein-rich ONS in older outpatients with HF co-morbid with malnutrition and anorexia and will provide insightful information for future randomized controlled trials.

Association between visit frequency, continuity of care, and pharmacy fill adherence in heart failure patients

Despite advances in medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), major gaps in medication adherence to guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) remain. Greater continuity of care may impact medication adherence and reduced hospitalizations. We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults with a diagnosis of HF and EF ≤40% with ≥2 outpatient encounters between January 1, 2017 and January 10, 2021, prescribed ≥1 of the following GDMT: 1) Beta Blocker, 2) Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor/Angiotensin Receptor Blocker/Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor, 3) Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist, 4) Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor. Continuity of care was calculated using the Bice-Boxerman Continuity of Care Index (COC) and the Usual Provider of Care (UPC) index, categorized by quantile. The primary outcome was adherence to GDMT, defined as average proportion of days covered ≥80% over 1 year. Secondary outcomes included all-cause and HF hospitalization at 1-year. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for demographics, insurance status, comorbidity index, number of visits and neighborhood SES index. Overall, 3,971 individuals were included (mean age 72 years (SD 14), 71% male, 66% White race). In adjusted analyses, compared to individuals in the highest COC quartile, individuals in the third COC quartile had higher odds of GDMT adherence (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03-1.53, P = .024). UPC tertile was not associated with adherence (all P > .05). Compared to the highest quantiles, the lowest UPC and COC quantiles had higher odds of all-cause (UPC: OR 1.53, 95%CI 1.23-1.91; COC: OR 2.54, 95%CI 1.94-3.34) and HF (UPC: OR 1.81, 95%CI 1.23-2.67; COC: OR 1.77, 95%CI 1.09-2.95) hospitalizations. Continuity of care was not associated with GDMT adherence among patients with HFrEF but lower continuity of care was associated with increased all-cause and HF-hospitalizations.