Medical-legal Risk Research Articles

Understanding the acceptance of business intelligence from healthcare professionals’ perspective: an empirical study of healthcare organizations

Purpose Due to its ability to support well-informed decision-making, business intelligence (BI) has grown in popularity among executives across a range of industries. However, given the volume of data collected in health-care organizations, there is a lack of exploration concerning its implementation. Consequently, this research paper aims to investigate the key factors affecting the acceptance and use of BI in healthcare organizations. Design/methodology/approach Leveraging the theoretical lens of the “unified theory of acceptance and use of technology” (UTAUT), a study framework was proposed and integrated with three context-related factors, including “rational decision-making culture” (RDC), “perceived threat to professional autonomy” (PTA) and “medical–legal risk” (MLR). The variables in the study framework were categorized as follows: information systems (IS) perspective; organizational perspective; and user perspective. In Jordan, 434 healthcare professionals participated in a cross-sectional online survey that was used to collect data. Findings The findings of the “structural equation modeling” revealed that professionals’ behavioral intentions toward using BI systems were significantly affected by performance expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, MLR, RDC and PTA. Also, an insignificant effect of PTA on PE was found based on the results of statistical analysis. These variables explained 68% of the variance (R2) in the individuals’ intentions to use BI-based health-care systems. Practical implications To promote the acceptance and use of BI technology in health-care settings, developers, designers, service providers and decision-makers will find this study to have a number of practical implications. Additionally, it will support the development of effective strategies and BI-based health-care systems based on these study results, attracting the interest of many users. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is one of the first studies that integrates the UTAUT model with three contextual factors (RDC, PTA and MLR) in addition to examining the suggested framework in a developing nation (Jordan). This study is one of the few in which the users’ acceptance behavior of BI systems was investigated in a health-care setting. More specifically, to the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study that reveals the critical antecedents of individuals’ intention to accept BI for health-care purposes in the Jordanian context.

Obesity does not increase the risk of side effects and complications of egg retrieval: delaying oocyte retrieval in obese patients is not a good strategy.

Obesity is one of the main concerns for public health and is becoming an increasingly widespread problem worldwide. Women are more likely to require a cesarean section and have a longer hospital stay after delivery. Excess body weight can interfere with ovulation and make it more difficult for embryos to implant in the uterus. A high body mass index (BMI) has controversial effects on the outcomes of medically assisted reproduction treatments (IVF) and, if careful counseling is not performed, medical-legal risks may be incurred. While some researchers argue that obesity does not particularly affect ART outcomes, other studies claim that a high BMI does not interfere with embryonic development. Both the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) has stated that there is no clear evidence supporting a BMI limit for IVF treatment and that each patient should be evaluated on an individual basis. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether performing in vitro fertilization on these patients increases the risk of medical, surgical, and anesthetic complications of oocyte retrieval. From January 2011 to December 2022, all patients with BMI higher than 25 were enrolled in the study (n=766). Complications and risks related to oocyte retrieval were evaluated, and patients were divided according to BMI groups. With the one-way ANOVA test, all groups were compared with the control group, and none showed statistically significant differences, only the number of produced embryos in the BMI group between 30-34.9 was lower and statistically significant. Only one study has analyzed these aspects, mainly focusing on the need for anesthesia drugs and any related complications, and the same author reported greater difficulty in performing oocyte retrieval. The same study recorded an increase in incomplete oocyte retrievals. Our work does not confirm any of these impressions.

Elucidating the Ruling Relations of Nurses’ Work in Labor and Delivery: An Institutional Ethnography

Obstetrics is a well-known area for malpractice and medical-legal claims, specifically as they relate to injuries the baby suffers during the intrapartum period. There is a direct implication for nurses’ work in labor and delivery because the law recognizes that monitoring fetal well-being during labor is a nursing responsibility. Using institutional ethnography, we uncovered how two powerful ruling discourses, namely biomedical and medical-legal risk discourses, socially organize nurses’ fetal surveillance work in labor and delivery through the use of an intertextual hierarchy and an ideological circle.

744. Infectious Diseases Providers Perspectives Around the Use of Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy (OPAT) for Persons Who Inject Drugs (PWID), US, 2022

Abstract Background Injection drug use-related infections are life threatening and may require prolonged courses of antibiotic therapy. There is no consensus on best practices for serious infections when patients are stable for discharge. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has been shown to be feasible for people who inject drugs (PWID) especially when paired with medication for opioid use disorder. We set out to determine the current practice patterns and attitudes of infectious diseases (ID) clinicians in the United States regarding the use of OPAT for PWID. Methods We surveyed ID clinicians between January 2022 and March 2022. Topics focused on PWID including OPAT access, barriers to inclusion in OPAT, and factors clinicians considered for OPAT success. Responses from those who perceived PWID were eligible for OPAT (PWID-E) were compared to those who believed PWID were ineligible (PWID-I) using the Pearson chi-squared test. Results Of 239 clinician respondents, 80% were MD, 6% DO, 5% NP, 2% PA, and 7% Pharmacists. 187 (78.2%) work at an academic practice and 179 (75%) work in an urban setting. 182 (76%) respondents have access to inpatient addiction medicine services and 206 (86%) reported availability of outpatient addiction treatment, but only 86 (36%) described patient access to outpatient services as “good” or “excellent.” Respondents were categorized as PWID-E (n=171, 72%) and PWID-I (n=68, 28%). Of the PWID-E group, only 48 (28%) have an institutional policy for determining eligibility. There was no significant difference in practice setting or access to addiction services between PWID-E and PWID-I. Access to inpatient and outpatient social work/case management was significantly higher for PWID-E. (Table 1). Clinicians reporting PWID-I were more likely to cite risk of tampering with PICC (76.5% vs 62.6%, p = 0.04) and medical-legal risk (47.1% vs 19.3%, p < 0.001) as barriers to OPAT. (Table 2). Conclusion A high proportion of respondents to this national survey offer OPAT for PWID, but only a minority have an institutional policy for eligibility. Guidelines that outline a framework for discharge decision making, education regarding medical and legal risk, and development of best practices may help to standardize care across settings. Disclosures Ellen Eaton, MD, MPH, Gilead HIV Research Scholar: Grant/Research Support|Gilead HIV research scholar: Grant/Research Support Monica K. Sikka, MD, F2G: Site research investigator.

The Opioid Epidemic in America: Pandemic Impacts.

There is still an ongoing epidemic of opioid abuse in the United States. It has resulted in a major healthcare crisis and led to an alarming number of daily overdose deaths. Strong interventions from the medical community and the government had made progress toward control. Tragically, the COVID-19 pandemic made the death rate dramatically worse. The purpose of this article is to reexamine the origins of this situation and provide updates from the pandemic period. The authors review the medical-legal risks physicians face when prescribing pain-relieving medications for their orthopaedic patients. Methods for providing responsible pain management plans for patients are suggested.

A Clinical Prediction Tool for MRI in Emergency Department Patients with Spinal Infection.

IntroductionPatients with pyogenic spinal Infection (PSI) are often not diagnosed at their initial presentation, and diagnostic delay is associated with increased morbidity and medical-legal risk. We derived a decision tool to estimate the risk of spinal infection and inform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) decisions.MethodsWe conducted a two-part prospective observational cohort study that collected variables from spine pain patients over a six-year derivation phase. We fit a multivariable regression model with logistic coefficients rounded to the nearest integer and used them for variable weighting in the final risk score. This score, SIRCH (spine infection risk calculation heuristic), uses four clinical variables to predict PSI. We calculated the statistical performance, MRI utilization, and model fit in the derivation phase. In the second phase we used the same protocol but enrolled only confirmed cases of spinal infection to assess the sensitivity of our prediction tool.ResultsIn the derivation phase, we evaluated 134 non-PSI and 40 PSI patients; median age in years was 55.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 38–70 and 51.5 (42–59), respectively. We identified four predictors for our risk score: historical risk factors; fever; progressive neurological deficit; and C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 50 milligrams per liter (mg/L). At a threshold SIRCH score of ≥ 3, the predictive model’s sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were, respectively, as follows: 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 100–100%); 56% (95% CI, 48–64%), and 40% (95% CI, 36–46%). The area under the receiver operator curve was 0.877 (95% CI, 0.829–0.925). The SIRCH score at a threshold of ≥ 3 would prompt significantly fewer MRIs compared to using an elevated CRP (only 99/174 MRIs compared to 144/174 MRIs, P <0.001). In the second phase (49 patient disease-only cohort), the sensitivities of the SIRCH score and CRP use (laboratory standard cut-off 3.5 mg/L) were 92% (95% CI, 84–98%), and 98% (95% CI, 94–100%), respectively.ConclusionThe SIRCH score provides a sensitive estimate of spinal infection risk and prompts fewer MRIs than elevated CRP (cut-off 3.5 mg/L) or clinician suspicion.

Medical-legal aspects and risk management

Complications of spinal surgery are an important source of professional liability judgments for trauma surgeons and neurosurgeons who develop this subspecialty. The disc pathology leads all the rankings of claims against these professionals. [1,2,3] This situation does not attract attention, given that lumbar and cervical disc hernias are frequent affections and more and more surgeons are turning to this activity. For the current neurosurgeon, the pathology of the spine tends to represent 50% of its benefits [4]. The high cost of agreements and sentences in cases of spinal surgeries is a reflection of the infrequent but severe damage that can occur when working millimeters from the spinal cord and nerve roots. Spine surgery has all the ingredients that can make a trial a nightmare. In general, patients with pathologies that do not threaten life, where the main symptom (pain) has a strong subjective component and where often the opinions of experts differ between conservative and radical approaches. There are several alternatives that are not always adequately reported to the patient, who may be surprised at evolutions that were not anticipated. On the other hand, in the case of quadriplegic or paraplegic patients, the costs of lost profits and future expenses are usually millionaires [5,6,7,8]. It is an extensive, varied and complex discipline and there are many authors who suggest the need to convert it into a new specialty [4] [9,10]. Spinal surgery is technically difficult and acquiring the necessary skills demands years of learning. The margin of error is minimal and only careful attention to detail in the pre, intra and postoperative ensures consistent good results. When complications arise and judgments for professional responsibility, the rush in the surgical decision (except in cases of clear urgency) and the lack of adequate information to the patient are usually aspects widely debated by all parties.

Compassion through tele-empathy: technology-mediated symptom transference

As medical students, we learn that we should be empathetic when caring for our patients. But what does this really mean? Clinical empathy is a combination of three discrete skills: 1. understanding the patient's circumstances, thoughts and feelings 2. verifying those with the patient 3. responding both appropriately and helpfully to the patient.1 The benefits of clinical empathy are wide-ranging. Among patients, clinical empathy can facilitate trust and engagement resulting in greater reporting of symptoms and concerns, increased education and higher levels of satisfaction.2,3 More objective benefits include increased diagnostic accuracy, improved adherence to medical recommendations and better outcomes.2,3 For physicians, clinical empathy can lead to less depression, increased quality of life and even lower medical-legal risk.2,3 The benefits of clinical empathy extend to caregivers as well. A …

Changes in Humanism During Medical School: a Synthesis of the Evidence

The importance of humanism in medical education and practice has been well established with relevance to patient satisfaction, adherence to recommended treatment plans, medical-legal risk, and potential for physician burnout. This review focused on longitudinal studies of medical students to answer two research questions: (1) Do components of humanism change over time in medical students? (2) Do components of humanism respond to intervention? We conducted a systematic review of the literature for English language articles published between 2000 and 2014. We searched using the word “humanism” and terms that represent constructs of humanism combined with “undergraduate medical education.” Articles including humanism at more than one point in time were included. Data extracted included the following: construct of humanism measured, measurement tool, timing of measurements, type of intervention included (deliberate programming vs. standard curriculum), and direction of change of the construct being assessed. Descriptive and non-parametric statistics were used. Forty-eight studies from 22 journals were reviewed. The direction of change was associated with study duration (Spearman’s rho = −.573, p = .000), indicating that studies with longer duration were more likely to report negative change. Study duration also differed across design categories (F = 17.447, p = .000). Empathy was assessed in 37 (77%), humanism in 16 (33%), and altruism in 1 study. Recommendations for practice include intentional, ongoing educational experiences to address humanism in medical students. Recommendations for future investigations include additional exploration of the role of context and perspective in understanding changes in humanism.

Health Policy and Shared Decision Making in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda.

Although the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and other laws have promoted the use of shared decision making (SDM) in recent years, few specific policies have addressed the opportunities and challenges of utilizing SDM in the emergency department (ED). Policies relating to physician payment, quality measurement, and medical-legal risks each present unique challenges to adoption of SDM in the ED. This article summarizes findings from a health policy breakout session of the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference "Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-relevant, Patient-centered Research Agenda." The objectives were to 1) describe federal and state policies that influence utilization or assessment of SDM; 2) identify policies and policy-focused knowledge gaps that serve as barriers to adoption of ED SDM; and 3) to define a consensus-based, policy-focused research agenda to support adoption of SDM in emergency care.

Choosing Wisely in Emergency Medicine: A National Survey of Emergency Medicine Academic Chairs and Division Chiefs.

The Choosing Wisely campaign was launched in 2011 to promote stewardship of medical resources by encouraging patients and physicians to speak with each other regarding the appropriateness of common tests and procedures. Medical societies including the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) have developed lists of potentially low-value practices for their members to address with patients. No research has described the awareness or attitudes of emergency physicians (EPs) regarding the Choosing Wisely campaign. The study objective was to assess these beliefs among leaders of academic departments of emergency medicine (EM). This was a Web-based survey of emergency department (ED) chairs and division chiefs at institutions with allopathic EM residency programs. The survey examined awareness of Choosing Wisely, anticipated effects of the program, and discussions of Choosing Wisely with patients and professional colleagues. Participants also identified factors they associated with the use of potentially low-value services in the ED. Questions and answer scales were refined using iterative pilot testing with EPs and health services researchers. Seventy-eight percent (105/134) of invited participants responded to the survey. Eighty percent of respondents were aware of Choosing Wisely. A majority of participants anticipate the program will decrease costs of care (72% of respondents) and use of ED diagnostic imaging (69%) but will have no effect on EP salaries (94%) or medical-legal risks (65%). Only 45% of chairs have ever addressed Choosing Wisely with patients, in contrast to 88 and 82% who have discussed it with faculty and residents, respectively. Consultant-requested tests were identified by 97% of residents as a potential contributor to low-value services in the ED. A substantial majority of academic EM leaders in our study were aware of Choosing Wisely, but only slightly more than half could recall any ACEP recommendations for the program. Respondents familiar with Choosing Wisely anticipated generally positive effects, but chairs reported only infrequently discussing Choosing Wisely with patients. Future research should identify potentially low-value tests requested by consultants and objectively measure the utility and cost of these tests among ED patient populations.

Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Recall Fewer Than 50% of the Risks Discussed in the Informed Consent Process Preoperatively and the Recall Rate Worsens Significantly in the Postoperative Period.

Recall of the informed consent process in patients undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery and their family members was investigated prospectively. To quantify the percentage recall of the most common complications discussed during the informed consent process in adult spinal deformity surgery, assess for differences between patients and family members, and correlate with mental status. Given high rates of complications in adult spinal deformity surgery, it is critical to shared decision making that patients are adequately informed about risks and are able to recall preoperative discussion of possible complications to mitigate medical legal risk. Patients undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery underwent an augmented informed consent process involving both verbal and video explanations. Recall of the 11 most common complications was scored. Mental status was assessed with the mini-mental status examination-brief version. Patients subjectively scored the informed consent process and video. After surgery, the recall test and mini-mental status examination-brief version were readministered at 5 additional time points: hospital discharge, 6 to 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Family members were assessed at the first 3 time points for comparison. Fifty-six patients enrolled. Despite ranking the consent process as important (median overall score: 10/10; video score: 9/10), median patient recall was only 45% immediately after discussion and video re-enforcement and subsequently declined to 18% at 6 to 8 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. Median family recall trended higher at 55% immediately and 36% at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively. The perception of the severity of complications significantly differs between patient and surgeon. Mental status scores showed a transient, significant decrease from preoperation to discharge but were significantly higher at 1 year. Despite being well-informed in an optimized informed consent process, patients cannot recall most surgical risks discussed and recall declines over time. Significant progress remains to improve informed consent retention. 3.

Spontaneous fracture: a potential clinical concern

Spontaneous fracture is an issue of increasing concern in clinical care. However, this topic has received only limited attention in nursing research. Gaps in understanding related to spontaneous fractures may increase medical-legal risks faced by frontline care nurses, exacerbate nursing pressures, and serve as a disincentive to remain in the already understaffed nursing profession. This article reviews previous research on spontaneous fractures to determine the epidemiological causes of clinical spontaneous fracture and identify effective prevention strategies. We hope this paper may increase clinical practitioner and expert awareness of spontaneous fractures; help establish a screening mechanism to identify high risk spontaneous fracture patients; and help nurses develop and implement proactive prevention / treatment strategies to strengthen awareness of this topic among patients and their families.

Vaccination against influenza in pregnant women – safety and effectiveness

Influenza is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. During seasonal influenza epidemics and pandemics, pregnancy places otherwise healthy women at an increased risk of complications from influenza. The factors believed to increase the susceptibility of complicated influenza infection during pregnancy are linked to the physiologic changes, including immunologic changes (attenuation of the cell-mediated immune responses, selective suppression of T-helper 1 cell mediated immunity while the adaptive humoral immunity remains unimpaired), increased cardiac output and oxygen consumption and tidal volume. Pregnant women have similar incidence of seasonal influenza as the general population, however because of the physiological changes, they are at an increased risk of complications (including secondary pneumonia, acute respiratory insufficiency increased risk of stillbirth, premature deliveries) and death. Immunization of pregnant women against influenza is currently recommended in many countries. Vaccination against influenza with trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) has been proven to be safe and effective. Lack of harmful effect of TIV on pregnant women and newborns has been demonstrated in several studies: no increased risk of spontaneous abortions, preterm birth, low birth weight, congenital malformations, cesarean section have been reported. Vaccination against influenza has been proven to be effective in reducing rates and severity of the disease in vaccinated mothers and their children. Several studies revealed a decreased risk of influenza-like illnesses among mothers who were vaccinated during pregnancy but also a decreased risk of laboratory confirmed cases of influenza and hospitalizations due to influenza and its complications among newborns and infants born to vaccinated mothers. Currently available inactivated influenza vaccines are not licensed for use in infants younger than 6 months. Protection of young infants against the infection in early life thus requires a cocooning strategy to reduce the number of vulnerable individuals among care givers and contacts. Neonates and infants may be also protected against influenza directly by antibodies of maternal origin that cross the placenta or are transferred via breast milk. The duration of passively acquired antibodies depends on the initial blood concentration and is probably less than 6 months. Vaccine coverage among pregnant women rdmains low Possible explanations include lack of education by health care workers, the feeling among the general public that influenza is not a serious problem, and the failure of prenatal care providers to offer the vaccine. Overall, the most important factor for a woman to decide to be immunized during pregnancy was to have a clear recommendation from the health care provider Reasons evoked by obstetricians for not providing influenza vaccines included lack sufficient data on safety and efficacy concerns about the medical legal risks of vaccination during pregnancy and the perdeption that pregnant women would not want to be vaccinated. Educational intervention targeting health care workers in charge of pregnant women should be primary implemented to provide higher influenza vaccine coverage and to protect pregnant women and young infants from influenza related morbidity

Malpractice Liability and Defensive Medicine: A National Survey of Neurosurgeons

BackgroundConcern over rising healthcare expenditures has led to increased scrutiny of medical practices. As medical liability and malpractice risk rise to crisis levels, the medical-legal environment has contributed to the practice of defensive medicine as practitioners attempt to mitigate liability risk. High-risk specialties, such as neurosurgery, are particularly affected and neurosurgeons have altered their practices to lessen medical-legal risk. We present the first national survey of American neurosurgeons’ perceptions of malpractice liability and defensive medicine practices.MethodsA validated, 51-question online-survey was sent to 3344 practicing U.S. neurosurgeon members of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, which represents 76% of neurosurgeons in academic and private practices.ResultsA total of 1028 surveys were completed (31% response rate) by neurosurgeons representing diverse sub-specialty practices. Respondents engaged in defensive medicine practices by ordering additional imaging studies (72%), laboratory tests (67%), referring patients to consultants (66%), or prescribing medications (40%). Malpractice premiums were considered a “major or extreme” burden by 64% of respondents which resulted in 45% of respondents eliminating high-risk procedures from their practice due to liability concerns.ConclusionsConcerns and perceptions about medical liability lead practitioners to practice defensive medicine. As a result, diagnostic testing, consultations and imaging studies are ordered to satisfy a perceived legal risk, resulting in higher healthcare expenditures. To minimize malpractice risk, some neurosurgeons have eliminated high-risk procedures. Left unchecked, concerns over medical liability will further defensive medicine practices, limit patient access to care, and increase the cost of healthcare delivery in the United States.

Increasing burden of institutional review in multicenter clinical trials of infertility: the Reproductive Medicine Network experience with the Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PPCOS) I and II studies

Many clinical investigators think that the burden of Institutional Review Board (IRB) requirements has been consistently increasing over recent years, although there are few objective data describing these trends. Over a period of 7 years, the Reproductive Medicine Network observed a significant increase in the size and requirements of IRB submissions and significant variability of IRB performance in reviewing multicenter trials. These additional regulatory and administrative demands represent substantial burdens to researchers and to the IRBs themselves. It is timely to consider whether these changes better protect the interests and safety of human research participants. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00068861 and NCT00719186.

Compliance with Fleischner Society Guidelines for Management of Lung Nodules: Lessons and Opportunities

Given the uncertainty regarding optimal follow-up strategies for various incidental findings and perceived medical-legal risk, additional evidence-based guidelines from professional organizations would likely minimize variability in recommendations while reducing unnecessary radiation and expense.

Strategies for Managing Imaging Utilization

Imaging represents a substantial and growing portion of the costs of American health care. When performed correctly and for the right reasons, medical imaging facilitates quality medical care that brings value to both patients and payers. When used incorrectly because of inappropriate economic incentives, unnecessary patient demands, or provider concerns for medical-legal risk, imaging costs can increase without increasing diagnostic yields. A number of methods have been tried to manage imaging utilization and achieve the best medical outcomes for patients without incurring unnecessary costs. The best method should combine a prospective approach; be transparent, evidence based, and unobtrusive to the doctor-patient relationship and provide for education and continuous quality improvement. Combining the proper utilization of imaging and its inherent cost reduction, with improved quality through credentialing and accreditation, achieves the highest value and simultaneous best outcomes for patients.

Liability of Emergency Physicians for Studies Ordered in the Emergency Department: Court Cases and Legal Defenses

Laboratory tests are frequently ordered in the Emergency Department (ED), with results returning at a later time. Emergency physicians (EPs) are frequently held liable when the test results are not followed-up. Recent legal malpractice cases are presented to provide examples of the medical-legal risks encountered when poor patient outcomes occur because the results of laboratory tests and other studies done in the ED are not followed-up and communicated to the patient. Emergency physicians are obligated to follow-up with patients when the results of laboratory and radiographic studies ordered in the ED are returned at a later time, and EPs are liable for any poor outcome if there is no follow-up. Appropriate follow-up mechanisms must be in place to improve patient outcomes and reduce the risk for the physician. Knowledge of the legal concepts of contributory negligence and comparative fault allows EPs to place themselves in an optimal position for a legal defense if a challenge is raised. It is imperative that abnormal results of tests done for ED evaluation and orders must be properly noted and followed-up. Optimal communication and relay of information to both the patient and the primary physician will reduce physician liability and enhance patient outcomes.

Medical Malpractice Matters: Medical Record M & Ms

Accurate and thorough chart documentation is extremely important not only for patient continuity of care but also for medical legal risk reduction. It is common knowledge that a large percentage of court cases involving health care practitioners rely substantially on the chart documentation to determine outcomes. In this article, the authors have outlined particular court cases that illustrate the dramatic influence medical documentation has had in case law.