Medical School Graduates Research Articles

Examining Racial and Gender Diversity in the Plastic Surgery Pipeline: Where is the Leak?

There is limited information about minority representation throughout the plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) pipeline. The aim of this study was to examine trends in representation among minorities at different stages of the PRS training pathway, starting with potential candidates in high school through practicing physicians. The PRS pipeline was defined as high school; college; medical school applicants, matriculants, and graduates; PRS residency applicants, matriculants, and active residents; and PRS practicing physicians. Racial data for each stage were obtained from the US Census and Association of American Medical Colleges. The proportion of races at each stage were divided by their US population counterpart proportions to produce representation quotients (RQs). Medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) are reported. Mann-Whitney U tests compared RQ values within identities between successive stages. Black students had high representation in high school (RQ = 1.26 [IQR: 1.21-1.29]) but had significant, stepwise decreases in representation in subsequent stages. A similar trend was observed for Hispanic individuals, who had their highest representation in high school (1.43 [1.37-1.50]), followed by significant decreases in RQ at nearly every subsequent stage up to and including practicing physicians (0.30 [0.28-0.31). Asian individuals were overrepresented at every stage (high school RQ: 1.01 [1.00-1.03]; practicing physician RQ: 2.30 [2.27-2.32]). White individuals were underrepresented before residency but had an RQ that approximated 1 in subsequent stages. Racial minorities experienced decreases in representation at each successive stage in the PRS pipeline following high school. Ongoing diversity efforts should focus on premedical recruitment and professional support for minority students.

Associations Between Secondary School Background, Academic Performance and Subsequent Career Achievements for Medical School Graduates in Sudan

Associations Between Secondary School Background, Academic Performance and Subsequent Career Achievements for Medical School Graduates in Sudan

Role of neodymium laser in surgery: stimulation of postoperative surgical wounds healing. Results of clinical studies

To prove the effectiveness of the low-intensity laser radiation application in the treatment of wounds of different origin. The clinical study involved 110 persons, divided into 55 subjects in both the study and control groups. The patients of the study group were exposed to the long-wave short-pulse neodymium laser immediately and within 35 days after interventions with a skin incision using it, in a way that wound treated with laser received low-level laser therapy. The control group patients' wounds were treated with standard methods by the means of topical drugs corresponding to the clinical manifestations of the wound process in each particular case. The study was carried out in the hospital of the department of maxillofacial and plastic surgery of the dental complex of the «Russian University of Medicine» from 2019 to 2022, and further conservative treatment was conducted in the department of dermatology and cosmetology of the University Hospital of the Medical Graduate School (Institute) of the RSSU. All wounds were classified into three groups for the convenience of systematization and formation of a generalized treatment protocol for postoperative surgical wounds. The objectivity and optimality of the chosen by us actions were confirmed in the conducted work. The formed scars were visually assessed on the POSAS scale at the end of the treatment by patients and 4 independent doctors, as well as each scar was visually assessed by four independent doctors and patients. At the end of the study we formed and proposed an algorithm for the treatment of surgical wounds of various origins. The parameters of the Aerolase Neo Light Pod neodymium laser for the treatment of patients with different types of skin wounds were clinically determined. Experimentally proven properties of the Aerolase Neo Light Pod neodymium laser on accelerating the healing process of surgical wounds through photobiomodulation mechanism support their regeneration with the formation of negligible normotrophic scars, as well as reduce the length of patients' treatment in surgical hospitals, as compared to patients receiving standard external drugs.

Defining Medical AI Competencies for Medical School Graduates: Outcomes of a Delphi Survey and Medical Student/Educator Questionnaire of South Korean Medical Schools.

Given the increasing significance and potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) technology on health care delivery, there is an increasing demand to integrate AI into medical school curricula. This study aimed to define medical AI competencies and identify the essential competencies for medical graduates in South Korea. An initial Delphi survey conducted in 2022 involving 4 groups of medical AI experts (n = 28) yielded 42 competency items. Subsequently, an online questionnaire survey was carried out with 1,955 participants (1,174 students and 781 professors) from medical schools across South Korea, utilizing the list of 42 competencies developed from the first Delphi round. A subsequent Delphi survey was conducted with 33 medical educators from 21 medical schools to differentiate the essential AI competences from the optional ones. The study identified 6 domains encompassing 36 AI competencies essential for medical graduates: (1) understanding digital health and changes driven by AI; (2) fundamental knowledge and skills in medical AI; (3) ethics and legal aspects in the use of medical AI; (4) medical AI application in clinical practice; (5) processing, analyzing, and evaluating medical data; and (6) research and development of medical AI, as well as subcompetencies within each domain. While numerous competencies within the first 4 domains were deemed essential, a higher percentage of experts indicated responses in the last 2 domains, data science and medical AI research and development, were optional. This medical AI framework of 6 competencies and their subcompetencies for medical graduates exhibits promising potential for guiding the integration of AI into medical curricula. Further studies conducted in diverse contexts and countries are necessary to validate and confirm the applicability of these findings. Additional research is imperative for developing specific and feasible educational models to integrate these proposed competencies into pre-existing curricula.

Medical Students' Perception of Interprofessional Education: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background and objective Interprofessional education (IPE) involves learners from multiple health professions learning collaboratively to improve patient care. This study assessed medical students' perceptions of IPE at Taibah University in Saudi Arabia. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 319 medical students in years two to six of graduate medical school and internships completed the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) questionnaire between April 2022 and July 2022. RIPLS consists of 19 items measuring teamwork/collaboration, negative/positive professional identity, and roles/responsibilities. Comparisons were made based on gender and academic level by using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results Students generally expressed positive attitudes towards IPE. The majority agreed that IPE improves teamwork, communication, and patient care. In our cohort, 148 students (46.4%)strongly agreed and 140(43.9%) agreed that shared learning enhances understanding of clinical problems. However, 186 students (60%) disagreed that clinical problem-solving is profession-specific. On the teamwork/collaboration subscale, 279 students (87.7%) strongly agreed that learning with others makes them more effective team members. Regarding negative identity, 186 students (58.3%) disagreed that learning with other students wastes time. By gender, males had lower ranks for negative identity (p=0.03) and positive identity (p=0.03) versus females. As for academic level, clinical students and interns had higher and lower ranks, respectively, for negative identity (p<0.01). Conclusion Based on our findings, medical students generally hold favorable views toward IPE and recognize its benefits for collaboration, communication, and patient care. Incorporating IPE throughout medical training may further improve attitudes and interprofessional skills.

Maxine Deborrah Hyde: First Female Graduate of Case Western Reserve University's Neurologic Surgery Residency Program and Second Black Female Neurosurgeon in the United States

The historical diversity gap in the neurosurgical workforce persists to this day. Women, despite constituting over half of the yearly total of medical school graduates, comprise only 6% of certified practicing neurosurgeons in the United States. Furthermore, Black Americans make up under 4% of U.S. neurosurgeons, despite making up around 14% of the national population. The purpose of this account is to highlight the life and career of Dr. Maxine Deborrah Hyde and illustrate the importance and necessity of diversity and inclusivity in advancing the field of neurosurgery. Through this paper, we aspire to encourage the development of new diversity initiatives. Original scientific and bibliographic materials of Hyde were examined, and an extensive analysis of her life was compiled. Despite growing up during the era of Jim Crow, Dr. Hyde persevered and became the valedictorian of Oak Park High School. As a first-generation college student at Tougaloo College, she later earned her MS from Cleveland State University. Dr. Hyde graduated with honors from Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine in 1977. Thereafter, she became the first female and first Black graduate of Case Western's neurosurgery residency and the second Black woman to receive certification from the American Board of Neurological Surgery. Later in life, Dr. Hyde established the Beacon of Hope Scholarship Foundation to assist disadvantaged students in overcoming educational barriers. Dr. Hyde was a trailblazer who overcame systematic barriers and paved the way for future generations of aspiring neurosurgeons.

Gender gap-Gender-specific development in the field of obstetrics and gynecology in Germany in the last 20 years.

Gender Gap refers to differences between men and women in terms of access to medical education, career development, and leadership positions in medical practice and research. Although women now make up most medical school graduates in many countries, they are often underrepresented in higher positions. The aim of this study is therefore to analyze the gender-specific development in the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Germany over the past 20 years and to survey the current status quo. An narrative review was carried out on the development of female graduates of human medicine, the proportion of women in contract medical care and clinical care, as well as the gender-specific evaluation of obtaining a gynecological/obstetric additional qualification. habilitation figures in the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology were evaluated about gender distribution. All data were received from federal institutes. A total of 46.7% (n = 95,234) of all inpatient doctors were female. A total of 46.7% (n = 95,234) of the physicians in hospitals were female. A total of 46% (1,832/3,958) were the portion of females as assistant physicians, 39.8% (n = 45.551) as specialists, 35.3% (n = 18789) as senior physicians, 25.1% (n = 2394) as first senior physicians and 25% (n = 10) as chief physicians in hospital. A total of 64.6% (n = 3958) of the physicians in Obstetrics and Gynecology were female. A total of 46% (1,832/3,958) were the portion of females as assistant physicians, 64.6% (n = 3958) as specialists, 65.0% (n = 1919) as senior physicians, 26.4% (n = 207) first senior physicians and 25% (n = 10) as chief physicians in Obstetrics and Gynecology. The problem with the gender gap in medicine, does not seem to be access to teaching or starting a residency. But in the functions with increasing responsibility and management functions, e.g., as senior physicians, women are already rarely seen. In Obstetrics and Gynecology, too, there is a shortage of women in leading positions, despite the relatively high numbers, for example as senior physicians. Factors like maternity and establishing a family are points mentioned therefore, but also stereotypes seem to be considerable facts. However, it is important to recognize the need for more women in higher positions in medicine and actively work to encourage more women to choose a career in medicine.

Perceptions of mistreatment: a comparison of students at two geographically and culturally distinct graduate medical schools

Perceptions of mistreatment: a comparison of students at two geographically and culturally distinct graduate medical schools

Medical student specialty decision-making and perceptions of neurosurgery. Part 2: Role of race/ethnicity.

Although individuals underrepresented in medicine (URM) make up 33% of the United States population, only 12.6% of medical school graduates identify as URM; the same percentage of URM students comprises neurosurgery residency applicants. More information is needed to understand how URM students are making specialty decisions and their perceptions of neurosurgery. The authors aimed to evaluate the differences between URM and non-URM medical students and residents in terms of the factors that contribute to specialty decision-making and perceptions of neurosurgery. A survey was administered to all medical students and resident physicians at a single Midwestern institution to assess factors influencing medical student specialty decision-making and perceptions of neurosurgery. Likert scale responses converted to numerical values on a 5-point scale (strongly agree was the high score of 5) were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U-test. The chi-square test was performed on the binary responses to examine associations between categorical variables. Semistructured interviews were conducted and analyzed using the grounded theory method. Of 272 respondents, 49.2% were medical students, 51.8% were residents, and 11.0% identified as URM. URM medical students considered research opportunities more than non-URM medical students in specialty decision-making (p = 0.023). When specialty decision-making factors were assessed, URM residents less strongly considered the technical skill required (p = 0.023), their perceived fit in the field (p < 0.001), and seeing people like them in the field (p = 0.010) than their non-URM counterparts when making specialty decisions. Within both medical student and resident respondent cohorts, the authors found no significant differences between URM and non-URM respondents in terms of their specialty decision-making being affected by medical school experiences such as shadowing, elective rotations, family exposure, or having a mentor in the field. URM residents were more concerned about the opportunity to work on health equity issues in neurosurgery than non-URM residents (p = 0.005). The predominant theme that emerged from interviews was the need for more intentional efforts to recruit and retain URM individuals in medicine and specifically neurosurgery. URM students may make specialty decisions differently than non-URM students. URM students were more hesitant toward neurosurgery due to their perceived lack of opportunity for health equity work in neurosurgery. These findings further inform optimization of both new and existing initiatives to improve URM student recruitment and retention in neurosurgery.

Medical student specialty decision-making and perceptions of neurosurgery. Part 1: Role of gender.

Although women account for 50% of medical school graduates, less than 30% of neurosurgery residency applicants and less than 10% of neurosurgeons are female. In order to diversify the field of neurosurgery and recruit more women, it is necessary to understand why there is a disproportionately low entry rate into neurosurgery by female medical students. Factors contributing to specialty decision-making and perceptions of neurosurgery among medical students and residents, specifically differences by gender, have not been studied. The authors aimed to investigate these differences using quantitative and qualitative methods. A Qualtrics survey was administered at the authors' institution to all medical students and resident physicians to assess factors influencing medical specialty decision-making and perceptions of neurosurgery. Likert scale responses converted to numerical values on a 5-point scale were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U-test. The chi-square test was performed on binary responses. Semistructured interviews were conducted in a subset of survey respondents and were analyzed by using the grounded theory method. Of the 272 survey respondents, 48.2% were medical students and 61.0% were female. When making specialty decisions, female medical students considered maternity/paternity leave more (p = 0.028) than their male counterparts. Female medical students were more hesitant toward neurosurgery due to maternity/paternity needs (p = 0.031) and the technical skill required (p = 0.020) than male medical students. Across both genders, the majority of medical students were hesitant toward neurosurgery due to opportunities for work/life integration (93%), length of training (88%), malignancy of the field (76%), and perceived happiness of the people in the field (76%). Female residents indicated they were more likely than male residents to consider the perceived happiness of the people in the field (p = 0.003), shadowing experiences (p = 0.019), and elective rotations (p = 0.004) when making specialty decisions. Two major themes emerged from the semistructured interviews: 1) maternity needs were more of a concern for women and 2) length of training was a concern for many individuals. Compared with their male counterparts, female students and residents consider different factors and experiences when choosing a medical specialty and have different perceptions of neurosurgery. Exposure to and education within neurosurgery, specifically maternity needs, may help address hesitancy in pursuing a neurosurgical career among female medical students. However, cultural and structural factors may need to be addressed within neurosurgery in order to ultimately increase representation of women.

A national perspective on exposure to essential surgical procedures among medical trainees in Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey and recommendations

BackgroundIn sub-Saharan Africa, recent graduates from medical school provide more direct surgical and procedural care to patients than their counterparts from the Global North. Nigeria has no nationally representative data on the procedures performed by trainees before graduation from medical school and their confidence in performing these procedures upon graduation has also not been evaluated.MethodsWe performed an internet-based, cross-sectional survey of recent medical school graduates from 15 accredited Federal, State, and private Nigerian medical schools spanning six geopolitical zones. Essential surgical procedures, bedside interventions and three Bellwether procedures were incorporated into the survey. Self-reported confidence immediately after graduation was calculated and compared using cumulative confidence scores with subgroup analysis of results by type and location of institution. Qualitative analysis of free text recommendations by participants was performed using the constant comparative method in grounded theory.ResultsFour hundred ninety-nine recent graduates from 6 geopolitical zones participated, representing 15 out of a total of 44 medical schools in Nigeria. Male to female ratio was 2:1, and most respondents (59%) graduated from Federal institutions. Students had greatest practical mean exposure to bedside procedures like intravenous access and passing urethral foley catheters and were most confident performing these. Less than 23% had performed over 10 of any of the assessed procedures.They had least exposures to chest tube insertion (0.24/person), caesarean Sect. (0.12/person), and laparotomy (0.09/person). Recent graduates from Federal institutions had less procedural exposure in urethral catheterization (p < 0.001), reduction (p = 0.035), and debridement (p < 0.035).Respondents that studied in the underserved North-East and North-West performed the highest median number of procedures prior to graduation. Cumulative confidence scores were low across all graduates (maximum 25/60), but highest in graduates from Northern Nigeria and private institutions. Graduates recommended prioritizing medical students over senior trainees, using simulation-based training and constructive individualized non-toxic feedback from faculty.ConclusionNigerian medical students have poor exposure to procedures and low confidence in performing basic procedures after graduation. More attention should be placed on training for essential surgeries and procedures in medical schools.

The need for hands-on training and supervision for entry-level physicians in a country with low surgical staffing density: a nationwide survey in Ghana

BackgroundDespite the largely unmet need, relatively few medical school graduates enrol in surgical residency and fewer surgical specialists work rurally in low- and middle-income countries. Surgical housemanship is the only formal training for medical graduates who will become the main surgical care providers in underserved areas. This study aimed to evaluate Ghanaian surgical housemanship (internship) and its impact on independent medical practice.MethodsA nationwide questionnaire survey of surgical trainees from seven teaching or regional-level hospitals ascertained the experience and self-confidence levels for 35 training objectives set by the Medical and Dental Council of Ghana, and suggestions to improve surgical training quality.ResultsOf 310 respondents, 59.7% experienced ≤ 10 cases for each topic, and 24.8% reported self-confidence as ≤ 2 points (out of 5). More than 90% of respondents experienced ≤ 10 cases for gastric, colorectal and liver cancer management. Teaching hospital trainees had lower proportions of those experiencing > 10 cases (36.6% versus 43.7%) and reporting self-confidence ≥ 4 (46.5% versus 55.8%), respectively, compared with those from regional/other-level hospitals. 40% of respondents were not confident about their surgical skills, and 70.5% requested better-supervised and practical surgical skills training. The proportion of respondents who reported limited supervision was higher among those from teaching hospitals, reported self-confidence scores < 4, and experienced ≤ 10 cases for each topic. 67% of respondents were satisfied with their surgical housemanship and 75.8% perceived surgical rotation as relevant to their future work.ConclusionsMost surgical trainees are concerned about their surgical skills. A structured curriculum with specific goals and better-supervised surgical skills training should be established. Inclusion of regional/other-level hospitals in surgical training may reduce the supervisory burden in teaching hospitals.

Publication outcomes among intensive care trainees.

There is a paucity of literature describing the research productivity among trainees in intensive care medicine. We sought to examine the occurrence and determinants of successful publication outcomes associated with intensive care training. The study cohort consisted of all individuals admitted to fellowship of the College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand (CICM) from 2012 to 2019. The primary outcome measure of this study was manuscripts indexed on PubMed within one year after and four years prior to admittance to CICM fellowship. Four hundred and eighty-five fellows were identified of whom 216 (45%) had at least one publication; 129 (27%) had one, 34 (7%) had two, 21 (4%) had three and 32 (7%) had four or more publications. Overall 138 (28%) fellows had at least one publication that was likely associated with their mandatory CICM training project for which they were first (n = 110; 80%) and/or corresponding (n = 72; 52%) author in the majority of cases. Overall 107 different senior/mentor authors were identified, with 13 individuals supporting more than one publication. Although gender and location at the time of fellowship award were not associated, location of receipt of medical degree, shorter time period between medical school graduation and fellowship award, more recent year of award, and completion of medical degree/fellowship in the same geographical region were associated with project publication. A minority of CICM fellows have PubMed-indexed publications related to their training. Further efforts are warranted to better define the determinants of successful project publication to optimise future opportunities.

Impact of Incentives on Physician Participation in Research Surveys: Randomized Experiment.

Web-based surveys can be effective data collection instruments; however, participation is notoriously low, particularly among professionals such as physicians. Few studies have explored the impact of varying amounts of monetary incentives on survey completion. This study aims to conduct a randomized study to assess how different incentive amounts influenced survey participation among neurologists in the United States. We distributed a web-based survey using standardized email text to 21,753 individuals randomly divided into 5 equal groups (≈4351 per group). In phase 1, each group was assigned to receive either nothing or a gift card for US $10, $20, $50, or $75, which was noted in the email subject and text. After 4 reminders, phase 2 began and each remaining individual was offered a US $75 gift card to complete the survey. We calculated and compared the proportions who completed the survey by phase 1 arm, both before and after the incentive change, using a chi-square test. As a secondary outcome, we also looked at survey participation as opposed to completion. For the 20,820 emails delivered, 879 (4.2%) recipients completed the survey; of the 879 recipients, 622 (70.8%) were neurologists. Among the neurologists, most were male (412/622, 66.2%), White (430/622, 69.1%), non-Hispanic (592/622, 95.2%), graduates of American medical schools (465/622, 74.8%), and board certified (598/622, 96.1%). A total of 39.7% (247/622) completed their neurology residency more than 20 years ago, and 62.4% (388/622) practiced in an urban setting. For phase 1, the proportions of respondents completing the survey increased as the incentive amount increased (46/4185, 1.1%; 76/4165, 1.8%; 86/4160, 2.1%; 104/4162, 2.5%; and 119/4148, 2.9%, for US $0, $10, $20, $50, and $75, respectively; P<.001). In phase 2, the survey completion rate for the former US $0 arm increased to 3% (116/3928). Those originally offered US $10, $20, $50, and $75 who had not yet participated were less likely to participate compared with the former US $0 arm (116/3928, 3%; 90/3936, 2.3%; 80/3902, 2.1%; 88/3845, 2.3%; and 74/3878, 1.9%, for US $0, $10, $20, $50, and $75, respectively; P=.03). For our secondary outcome of survey participation, a trend similar to that of survey completion was observed in phase 1 (55/4185, 1.3%; 85/4165, 2%; 96/4160, 2.3%; 118/4162, 2.8%; and 135/4148, 3.3%, for US $0, $10, $20, $50, and $75, respectively; P<.001) and phase 2 (116/3928, 3%; 90/3936, 2.3%; 80/3902, 2.1%; 88/3845, 2.3%; and 86/3845, 2.2%, for US $0, $10, $20, $50, and $75, respectively; P=.10). As expected, monetary incentives can boost physician survey participation and completion, with a positive correlation between the amount offered and participation.

Response time of high impact factor medical journals versus an expert-curated, online oncology platform before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

465 Background: The objective of this study was to characterize the publication speed of high impact factor medical journals (HIFMJ) compared with the dissemination speed of a private, expert-curated, online platform (ECOP) designed for oncologists. We also aimed to describe determinants of response speed to questions on this platform. Methods: We selected 100 HIFMJ and calculated their reported peer review time (Submission to Acceptance [STA]). The platform database was queried between the dates 2017 and 2022 with information collected about day of query, response time (RespT), and poster gender, region, and medical school graduation year. This data was analyzed utilizing univariable median regression analyses and two t-tests as appropriate. Results: Of the 26 available medical journal response times, the average STA was 57.36 days (range: 2.6 - 204 days). Of the 4,346 online platform questions and answers (Q+A), the mean RespT was noted to be significantly lower at 2.63 days (CI, 2.19 - 3.07 days). With the ECOP, the mean RespT for male posters (mean: 2.58 days; CI, 2.08 - 3.08) and female posters (mean: 2.72 days, CI, 1.89 - 3.56) was not significantly different (p=0.61). RespT from 2017 to 2019 increased slightly (p&lt;0.001) before trending down during the COVID pandemic (p&lt;0.02). Mean RespT before the Covid pandemic in the United States, March 15, 2020 (2.68 days, CI, 2.11 - 3.25), was non-significantly reduced as compared with questions after March 15, 2020 (2.17 days, CI, 1.88 - 2.46, p=0.13). Conclusions: Traditional peer review proves a lengthy process in contrast to real-time, Q+A-based oncology platforms. An ECOP allows physicians the ability to provide their expertise regarding rare, nuanced patient cases in order to better ensure all patients receive the highest level of clinical care. During the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the ability to share medically curated information to ensure safe and effective oncologic care in a timely manner proved imperative, as information regarding the virus was evolving rapidly. During this unprecedented time, this platform provided oncologists with a novel way to quickly vet case reports and disseminate scientific information. This, in turn, translated into cancer care “best practices” during a rapidly evolving crisis.

Perspectives from two recent medical school graduates on exposure to pathology during undergraduate medical education: A narrative inquiry

The field of pathology is facing an inflection point where the demand for pathology services is not being met by a corresponding rise in recruitment into the field. Many of the myths about the field of pathology have been dispelled elsewhere, but there have not been many formal accounts of the experience medical students’ face when finding their path to pathology. Because of challenges in the visibility of pathology as a specialty and not simply a subject required for United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1, students tend to fall into one of two categories: early differentiators or late discoverers. Here, we provide anecdotal accounts of these two paths at institutions with different curricular designs and provide a first-hand account of the challenges we faced and opportunities discovered in our journeys to pathology. Based on these experiences, we offer suggestions for ways to address some of the issues medical students must navigate when trying to explore pathology in curricula not built for such exploration.

Survey of ASCO Sponsored Oncology Interest Groups in the United States Assessing Medical Student Perceptions of Education in Radiation Oncology and Future Employment Prospects

Over the last five years, applications to radiation oncology residency programs among graduates of medical schools in the United States (US) have declined by nearly 50% with a corresponding increase in unfilled positions in the National Resident Matching Program. This has led to ongoing concern regarding the future of the radiation oncology workforce and speculation regarding contributing factors. There are no published data substantiating medical student viewpoints on these issues. To better understand medical student perceptions of oncology specialties (medical oncology (MO), radiation oncology (RO), and surgical oncology/surgical subspecialties (SO)) and factors contributing to their career choices, we conducted a survey among oncology interest groups sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Survey content emphasized relative impressions of oncology specialties, exposure to these fields during medical school, and perceptions of future employment prospects. An IRB-approved thirty-item questionnaire was distributed electronically via SurveyMonkey to US medical student members of ASCO sponsored interest groups. Participation was optional at the institutional and individual level and responses anonymous. Chi square test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Two-hundred seventy-nine students completed the survey (37% male, 62% female; 42% White, 40% Asian, 18% underrepresented minorities). Students report receiving less exposure to radiation oncology during medical school: 19% report RO is not included in their curriculum vs. 4% for MO (p<0.01); 77% report receiving lectures from MO faculty, 33% from RO, and 41% from SO (p <0.01); 41% were encouraged to consider RO as a specialty, compared to 62 % for MO and 42% for SO (p < 0.01); 45% report having a clear understanding of role of MO in oncology care vs. only 25% for RO and 38% for SO (p<0.01); 41% saw MO as leaders of the multidisciplinary cancer team, 1 % for RO, and 2% for SO, 47% felt all played equal roles (p<0.01). Students have more negative perceptions of future career prospects for RO: 81% feel that job prospects for MO are strong, 55% for RO and 73% for SO (p<0.01); 54% feel strongly that jobs are available in desirable geographic locations for MO, 36% for RO, 48% for SO (p<0.01); 27% of students report concerns about the future viability of RO, 10% for MO, and 11% for SO (p<0.01). Compared to other oncology specialties, students have less exposure to RO, less understanding of the role of RO in multidisciplinary cancer care, and more pessimism about the future job market/specialty viability. These are likely contributing factors to declining interest in RO among graduates of US medical schools. Current radiation oncologists should increase efforts to improve medical student interest and understanding of RO.

Projected Lifetime Earnings of a Radiation Oncologist

The estimated lifetime earnings of a radiation oncologist depend on many choices and have not been calculated. The objective of this work is to project the year-by-year and cumulative lifetime earnings of a US-based radiation oncologist based on various career pathways. We modeled lifetime earnings based on undergraduate training (reference: assumes starting at age 18, tuition/loans of $40,000 x 4 years), MD/DO (reference: assumes tuition/loans of $55,000 x 4 years, 8% interest) vs MD/PhD program (assumes no tuition, $30,000 yearly stipend x 8 years), gap year(s), fellowship, employment paths (academic, private practice, hospital employed, physician scientist with NIH salary cap), adjustable salary during employment (based on 2016-2018 AAMC and MGMA; e.g., promotion for academic track, partnership for private practice), adjustable state and federal income taxes, loan repayment options (e.g., out of pocket, NIH loan repayment program [LRP], public service loan forgiveness [PSLF]). The primary outcome was cumulative lifetime earnings, and additional analyses were conducted based on changes in career paths. We created a web-based application to simulate the various choices using R Shiny: https://physician-earnings.shinyapps.io/rshiny/. For an academic radiation oncologist, assuming MD/DO degree, national average of $220,000 in loans at medical school graduation, 5% state income tax, no gap years, pursuing PSLF, starting as assistant professor, 7 year promotion until associate professor, and 7 subsequent year promotion to full professor, and retirement age of 65, the post-tax median lifetime earnings are $9,610,675 (IQR $8,097,433 - $10,885,824), with $5,242,653 federal + state taxes. With the private practice setting, the median lifetime earnings are $11,383,781 (IQR $9,875,040 - $13,325,316). As a hospital employee, the median lifetime earnings are $8,834,886 (IQR $8,127,132 - $10,166,145). As an NIH-salary capped physician scientist, the median lifetime earnings are $4,678,668 (IQR not provided, given one set cap). Using the academic track as the reference group, the median lifetime earnings would change as follows: $9,333,434 (IQR $7,876,310 - $10,572,388) for those who pursue one paid undergraduate gap year; $9,125,590 (IQR $7,822,115 - $10,274,801) for those who pursue MD/PhD programs; $10,365,300 (IQR $8,725,954 - $11,746,712) for those with 0% state income tax during practice; and $9,565,364 (IQR $7,875,284 - $10,802,830) for those who repay their loans out of pocket at 50% of their attending salary. PSLF and NIH LRP allow one to cross a net worth of $0 by their mid-30s; pursuit of fellowship, starting as an instructor in academics, salary in bottom quartile %, paying loans out of pocket, and gap years all delay this landmark by 1-4 years. NIH-salary capped positions have the largest negative impact on lifetime earnings, by > $5,000,000. We created a model to estimate lifetime earnings of a radiation oncologist in the US.

A comparison of the American Board of Anesthesiology's in-person and virtual objective structured clinical examinations

BackgroundThe American Board of Anesthesiology's Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), as a component of its initial certification process, had been administered in-person in a dedicated assessment center since its launch in 2018 until March 2020. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a virtual format of the exam was piloted in December 2020 and was administered in 2021. This study aimed to compare candidate performance, examiner grading severity, and scenario difficulty between these two formats of the OSCE. MethodsThe Many-Facet Rasch Model was utilized to estimate candidate performance, examiner grading severity, and scenario difficulty for the in-person and virtual OSCEs separately. The virtual OSCE was equated to the in-person OSCE by common examiners and common scenarios. Independent-samples t-test was used to compare candidate performance, and partially overlapping samples t-tests were applied to compare examiner grading severity and scenario difficulty between the in-person and virtual OSCEs. ResultsThe in-person (n = 3235) and virtual (n = 2934) first-time candidates were comparable in age, sex, race/ethnicity, and whether U.S. medical school graduates. The virtual scenarios (n = 35, mean [0.21] ± SD [0.38] in logits) were more difficult than the in-person scenarios (n = 93, 0.00 ± 0.69, Welch's partially overlapping samples t-test, p = 0.01); there were no statistically significant differences in examiner severity (n = 390, −0.01 ± 0.82 vs. n = 304, −0.02 ± 0.93, Welch's partially overlapping samples t-test, p = 0.81) or candidate performance (2.19 ± 0.93 vs. 2.18 ± 0.92, Welch's independent samples t-test, p = 0.83) between the in-person and virtual OSCEs. ConclusionsOur retrospective analyses of first-time OSCEs found comparable candidate performance and examiner grading severity between the in-person and virtual formats, despite the virtual scenarios being more difficult than the in-person scenarios. These results provided assurance that the virtual OSCE functioned reasonably well in a high-stakes setting.

Is it broken?

Orthopaedics: A specialty with 388 current active surgeons in Aotearoa New Zealand of whom just 25 (6.4%) are women. This is a pretty dismal statistic given that women represent more than 50% of our medical school graduates. We acknowledge that not everyone has a strong interest in orthopaedics and that it is possible that a greater number of female doctors may genuinely be more interested in other areas of medicine. However, the issue is about ensuring that those that do have the interest and the potential to become great surgeons are not discouraged by feeling as if they do not belong. With the current gender inequality in orthopaedics, we are missing out on potential talent and the benefits of diversity. In addition, there are few Māori and Pasifika surgeons in Aotearoa New Zealand and only one openly gay practicing orthopaedic surgeon. Beyond even the sense of fairness and equity or the moral imperative, we know that diversity benefits organisations. Diverse groups make better decisions and experience improved creativity, performance, collaboration, and innovation. In step with this, the 30% Club is an established global campaign to improve female representation at board level in the world’s biggest companies. Evidence based studies have shown that improving diversity, in orthopaedics specifically, leads to higher quality patient care and better outcomes.