Medical Device-related Pressure Injury Research Articles

Prevention of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in The Operating Room: Nurses’ Knowledge and Training Imperatives

Prevention of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in The Operating Room: Nurses’ Knowledge and Training Imperatives

Assessment by finite element analysis modelling of tissue strains associated with the use of two different nasogastric tube securement devices.

Nasogastric tube use can lead to pressure injury. Some nasogastric tube securement devices (NG-SD) include hard plastic components. In the current study, we assessed the differences in strain profiles for two NG-SD, one with hard segments and one without hard segments, using finite element analysis (FEA) to measure strain and deformation occurring at the nasogastric tube-tissue interface. FEA in silico models of devices were based on device mechanical test data and clinically relevant placements. Peak strain values were determined by modelling different scenarios using Abaqus software whereby the tubing is moved during wear. The modelling showed peak strains ranging from 52% to 434% for the two NG-SD depending on the tubing placement and device type. Peak strain was always higher for the hard plastic device. Tissue strain energy was a minimum of 133.8 mJ for the NG-SD with no hard parts and a maximum of 311.6 mJ for the NG-SD with hard parts. This study provided evidence through in silico modelling that NG-SD without hard components may impart less strain and stress to tissues which may provide an option for tube securement that is less likely to cause medical device-related pressure injury.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in Hemodynamically Unstable Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and identify potential risk factors for medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) in critically ill and hemodynamically unstable adults (patients classified class III or IV on the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28; TISS-28). Prospective cohort study. The target population was critically ill adults who were using one or more medical devices and categorized as class III or IV on the TISS-28. The study sample comprised 77 participants followed daily until discharge, death, transfer, or lesion development. Data were collected from January to March 2020. The study setting was an intensive care unit with 40 beds in a large hospital in a municipality in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Sociodemographic and pertinent clinical data, pressure injury (PI) risk assessed using the Braden Scale for Pressure Sore Risk, and head-to-toe skin inspections were completed. The incidence rate of MDRPIs was calculated, and survival analyses were completed via the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. Forty-nine of 77 participants developed an MDRPI, reflecting an incidence rate of 63.6%. Collectively, 71 MDRPIs occurred in these 49 participants. Univariate analysis indicated significant associations between MDRPI occurrences and level of consciousness ( P =<.001), use of tube holder for ventilation devices ( P =.013), nasal cannula ( P =.034), nasogastric cannula ( P =.034), presence of edema ( P =.001), infection ( P =.007), higher TISS score ( P =.047), and greater number of medical devices ( P =.022). Survival analysis indicated that a high or very high-risk score on the Braden Scale for Pressure Sore Risk ( P =.043) and edema ( P =.030) are risk factors for MDRPI occurrences in this vulnerable population. The incidence rate of MDRPIs was 63.6%. The categories with the highest high or very high risk scores on the Braden Scale for Risk of Pressure Pain and Edema emerged as risk factors for MDRPI in this critically ill and vulnerable population.

Protocols and their effects for medical device-related pressure injury prevention among critically ill patients: a systematic review

BackgroundA pressure injury refers to localized damage to the skin and/or tissue due to prolonged pressure, and it has recently been defined to include pressure injuries related to medical devices. Medical device-related pressure injuries occur in various sites and are difficult to detect. Even if it is detected, medical devices are essential to life for critically ill patients. Thus, it is difficult to remove or change the position of the medical device; therefore, prevention is essential. This study aims to integrate the literature on medical device-related pressure injury prevention protocols among critically ill patients.MethodsThe literature inclusion criteria were (1) critically ill patients, (2) device-related pressure injury interventions, (3) randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs, and (4) written in Korean or English. The literature search and selection were performed following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions with the support of the PRISMA Guidelines.ResultsTwelve articles were finally selected. The incidence of medical device-related pressure injury decreased from 8.1–96.7% before intervention to 0.3–53.3% after intervention, respectively. Medical device-related pressure injury prevention was effective in reducing medical device-related pressure injury incidence when applied to patients of all ages, from neonates to adults, in a variety of intensive care units. Medical device-related pressure injury prevention strategies include nurse education, assessment, documentation, and interventions (hygiene, repositioning, emergent therapy such as protective dressing or designed equipment reducing pressure) of pressure injury. Pressure injury dressings primarily included hydrocolloid foam dressings, but transparent hydrocolloid formulations also effectively reduced medical device-related pressure injury incidence rates.ConclusionsIn the future, it is necessary to increase the level of evidence by applying specialized medical device-related pressure injury prevention methods for different medical devices and areas of pressure injuries, and verifying their effectiveness.Trial registrationThe review protocol was registered (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022346450).

Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in The Median Back Caused by A Rigid Brace

Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in The Median Back Caused by A Rigid Brace

Knowledge of Staff Nurses Regarding Medical Device Related Pressure Injury (MDRPI)

Knowledge of Staff Nurses Regarding Medical Device Related Pressure Injury (MDRPI)

Determination of the Knowledge Level of Surgical Intensive Care Nurses in Medical Device Induced Pressure Injury

Aim: The purpose of this study was to measure the level of knowledge and attitudes of nurses in surgical intensive care units (ICUs) about medical device-induced pressure injury. Method: The cross-sectional study was conducted with 227 surgical intensive care nurses in Turkey between November 2022 and June 2023. “Nurse Introduction Form” and “Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Level Assessment Tool Scale” were used as data collection tools. Since the scale score averages did not comply with normal distribution, Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests were used in the statistical analysis of the data. Results: It was found that the majority of participants (n=227) were in the age range of 26-33 years (n=115), and 66.1% (n=113) had been working in the ICU for 1-5 years. 51.5% (n=117) of the participants reported having received training in medical device-related pressure injury. In the pressure ulcer knowledge level assessment tool, the mean of the "prevention of pressure ulcers" sub-dimension (mean: 4.74) was found to be the highest, while the total knowledge level score was 14.87±5.6 and it was found that the nurses had a moderate level of knowledge. Conclusion: The findings of the study indicated that nurses' knowledge of medical device-related pressure injuries was inadequate, but that their knowledge of pressure injury prevention increased with increasing levels of education.

Determination of Incidence and Risk Factors of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in the ICU: A Descriptive Study.

To determine the incidence and risk factors of medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) in the ICU. In this descriptive study, the researchers collected data through systematic observation of patients (n = 58) in the ICU. The patients were evaluated within 24 hours of ICU admission and then followed up until they were discharged. A total of 482 patient-days were followed. The researchers used the MDRPI follow-up form, the patient descriptive form, the MDRPI follow-up form, and the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk for data collection. Overall, 39.7% of the 58 patients hospitalized in the ICU developed an MDRPI, and 5.2% of the MDRPIs were evaluated as stage 2. These injuries occurred in an average of 5 days after the patient was admitted to the ICU. Among the MDRPIs that developed, 31.9% were located in the nose, 21.3% in the mouth, and 14.9% on the cheeks. Intubation tubes were used in 7.3% of the patients, nasogastric tubes in 22.4% of the patients, and radial artery catheters in 10.5% of the patients. The development of MDRPI is correlated with the type of medical device used. Providers should establish a planned care protocol based on the anatomic placement of the medical device and take necessary precautions to prevent MDRPI.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Brief Training for Neonatal Intensive Care Nurses on the Prevention of Medical Device-Related Nasal Pressure Injury.

To evaluate the effectiveness of a brief training in medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) prevention for neonatal intensive care nurses. This single-group, pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study was conducted between April and October 2021 with 81 nurses working in the neonatal ICU of a city hospital. The participants completed a training program consisting of two 40-minute sessions that used a small-group problem-based learning approach developed in accordance with evidence-based research. Data were collected using a neonatal nurse information form, knowledge of MDRPI in preterm infants form, and training evaluation form, all of which were prepared for this study based on the literature. Data collection was performed before the training and repeated at 1 week and 1 month after the training. Data analysis was performed using the Number Cruncher Statistical System. Descriptive statistics, the Shapiro-Wilk test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation analysis were used. The participants' mean score on the knowledge of MDRPI in premature infants form was 82.44 ± 7.26 before training and increased significantly to 94.57 ± 5.03 at 1 week and 94.67 ± 3.11 at 1 month after training (P = .001 and P = .001, respectively). No significant relationship was detected between the participants' descriptive characteristics and their knowledge scores before or after the training (P > .05). Brief training on the prevention of nasal pressure injury caused by noninvasive ventilation increased nurses' knowledge level.

Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Care and Prevention Training Program (DevICeU): Effects on intensive care nurses' knowledge, prevention performance and point prevalence

ObjectiveTo determine the effect of the training given to intensive care unit (ICU) nurses to prevent medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) on nurses' knowledge levels, their prevention performance, and the point prevalence (PP) of MDRPIs. Research Methodology/DesignA pre-post test intervention study without a control group. SettingThe study was conducted between May and July 2023 with ICU nurses in three phases: pre-training phase (E0) (104 nurses, 116 patients), training implementation phase (E) and post-training phase (E1) (89 nurses, 120 patients). Main Outcome MeasuresThe data were collected by using the Patient (E0, E1) and Nurse (E0) Characteristic Forms, MDRPI Follow-up and Prevalence Form (E0, E1), D.E.V.I.C.E Performance Observation Checklist (E0, E1), MDRPI Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire (E0, E1), Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale (E0, E1), Pressure Injury Grading Form (E0, E1), and Feedback Form about the Training Process (E). ResultsThe mean MDRPI knowledge score of the nurses increased significantly from E0 to E1 (13.23 ± 1.43 vs. 20.02 ± 1.30, p = 0.001), with the highest improvement in the staging and prevention themes. Nurses’ MDRPI prevention performance increased significantly from E0 to E1 (2.15 ± 1.01 vs. 11.17 ± 1.65, p = 0.001). There was a significant difference between the PP rate at E0 (61.2 %) and E1 (27.5 %) (p = 0.001). ConclusionThe study indicated that the training on MDRPIs given to ICU nurses increased their knowledge and prevention performance and decreased the prevalence of MDRPIs. However, further studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm these findings. Implications for clinical practiceSince MDRPIs have more complex staging and prevention practices than conventional PIs, they require the adoption of a training approach that includes visual materials and practical methods in addition to theoretical knowledge. Accurate definitions of medical device dimensions and fixation, skin assessment, and prevention practices will lead to the desired outcome of reducing MDRPIs in ICUs.

Feasibility, acceptability, and usability of implementing a medical device-related pressure injury algorithm for critically ill patients using non-invasive ventilation

ObjectivesDescribe the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of implementing a nurse-led intervention to prevent medical device-related pressure injury in critical care patients using non-invasive ventilation during hospitalization. Study designA quality improvement project, using a descriptive single-arm study design with convenience sampling. Setting and participantsThis study was conducted at a Midwestern medical center with 640 beds (two hospital campuses). After an educational session, the nurse-led algorithm for non-invasive ventilation medical device-related pressure injury prevention was implemented in two critical care nursing units (cardiac medical progressive care and neurotrauma intensive care unit). Nursing staff were full or part-time critical care nurses. Main outcome measuresFeasibility, acceptability, and usability of the non-invasive ventilation medical device-related pressure injury algorithm were measured (bedside rounding and pre/post System Usability Scale). ResultsThirty-five nurses (52.2 %) completed a pre-educational survey; 8 (11.2 %) completed a post-survey. The total mean pre-survey score was 70.7 (SD ± 13.6) and the post-survey mean score was 71.3(SD ± 19.6). There was a statistically significant increase in the post-survey mean score {Χ2 (1, N = 43) = 43.5, p <.05}, however, the 0.06 increase was not clinically meaningful. Bedside rounding interviews (n = 22) indicated 82 % (n = 18) of the nurses used the algorithm. The SUS tool mean score was 83.3 (10.73) pre-implementation (n = 21); and 85.63 (8.26) post-implementation (n = 5), indicating clinical usability of the algorithm pre- and post-implementation. ConclusionThe feasibility, acceptability, and usability of implementing a medical device-related pressure injury algorithm for critically ill patients using non-invasive ventilation were demonstrated during this study. More nursing research is needed to develop scalable interdisciplinary clinical algorithms to reduce medical device-related pressure injuries in patients using non-invasive ventilation. Implications for clinical practiceThis study focused on the bedside usability of the algorithm in a clinical setting. Implementing this nursing-developed algorithm created an interdisciplinary framework in which nursing assessment may guide clinical care.

Medical device-related pressure injury from compression therapy

The use of compression therapy is known to be effective in the management of patients with venous leg ulceration and is commonly recommended as a first-line treatment. A rare but known complication of compression therapy is pressure damage to the limb, also referred to as bandage damage, which should be categorised as a medical device-related pressure injury. Patients should receive a comprehensive, holistic assessment before any compression therapy is applied. Risk factors for compression therapy injury include peripheral arterial disease, older age, fragile skin, pronounced bony prominences or tendons, calf atrophy, foot drop, neuropathy/absent sensation, limited movement, cognitive impairment and receiving end of life care. Risks can be mitigated through a variety of approaches, and practitioners should be aware that these can change depending on the patient's condition. A community improvement initiative, illustrated with a case study, introduced a clinical pathway that can facilitate the identification and management of patients who are at risk of developing pressure injuries as a result of compression therapy.

Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in Critically Ill Patients

Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in Critically Ill Patients

Determining the incidence and risk factors of medical device-related pressure injury in intensive care patients

AimThis study aims to determine the incidence and risk factors of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury (MDRPI) in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. Material and methodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study involved 300 patients who did not have an MDRPI at the time of admission to the ICU of a university hospital in Turkey. The data was collected using the Patient Information Form, the Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Follow-Up Chart, and the Jackson/Cubbin Risk Assessment Scale. ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 71.88 ± 14.82 years old. Precisely 31% of patients were found to be at risk for pressure injuries, and MDRPI occurred in 18% of them. It was found that patients most commonly experienced stage 1 MDRPI in the hand-finger region due to pulse oximetry. It was also determined that nasal cannulas caused MDRPI the fastest. Patients with MDRPI had low Jackson/Cubbin scores, low albumin and hematocrit levels, and longer hospitalization durations (p < .05). Dependence on -respiratory support device, bedridden, and experiencing non-device-related pressure injuries were associated with MDRPI (p < .05). ConclusionIt was found that factors causing non-device-related pressure injuries may also pose an MDRPI risk for patients in intensive care. It was also observed that devices used in ICU could cause pressure injuries even in very short periods in cases where necessary precautions are not taken. Periodic evaluation of the area the medical devices are in contact with, removal of unused devices as quickly as possible, and the use of prophylactic dressings can play an important role in preventing MDRPI.

Design and application of decompression fixator to prevent HFNC facial pressure injury

As a new respiratory support technique, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) has been widely used in clinical practice in recent years. During HFNC treatment, due to the long time and continuous wearing of nasal stopper and fasteners on the patient face, it is easy to cause medical device-related pressure injury on multiple facial skin. Moreover, when the patient's position changes greatly, because there is no good fixed design at the HFNC nasal stopper, it is easy to shift or turn the nasal stopper outward, causing abnormal ventilation and failure to achieve the purpose of clinical oxygen therapy. To overcome above problems, medical staff in the intensive care unit of department of infectious diseases, Tongji Hospital Tongji Medical College of HUST designed a new type of decompression fixator to prevent HFNC face pressure injury, and obtained national utility model patent (ZL 2022 2 0754626.1). The integrated design structure of the device has the functions of decompression of facial skin and fixation of nasal stopper, which can ensure the effect of oxygen therapy and improve the oxygen therapy experience and patient comfort, which is suitable for clinical promotion.

The Characteristics and Risk Factors of Medical Device Related Pressure Injury in Intensive Care Unit Patients

Purpose : This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and risk factors associated with pressure injuries related to medical devices among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).Method : A retrospective study analyzed data from 462 ICU patients. Statistical analyses, including independent t-tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and logistic regression were performed to analyze the data.Results : Among the 154 subjects, there were a total of 198 medical device–related pressure injuries (MDRPI). Stage 2 and deep tissue pressure injuries were the most frequent. MDRPI occurred most frequently on the face, with nasogastric tubes being its leading cause, followed by endotracheal tubes. The risk factors for MDRPI included male sex (odds ratio [OR]=1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.12-2.83), department at the time of ICU admission (OR=4.29, 95% CI=2.01-9.15), post-surgery ICU admission (OR=0.43, 95% CI=0.25-0.73), application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation machines (OR=2.72, 95% CI=1.06-6.95), number of medical devices (OR=1.16, 95% CI=1.05-1.30), inotropic drug administration (OR=2.33, 95% CI=1.19-4.60), and sedative use (OR=2.53, 95% CI=1.17-5.45).Conclusion : These results enable the determination of the characteristics and risk factors associated with MDRPI. It is crucial to acknowledge the risk factors for MDRPI in ICU patients and establish a prevention strategy.

Risk factors for medical device-related pressure injury in ICU patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is a serious issue. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors for MDRPI associated with ICU patients through systematic review and meta-analysis, and provide insights into the clinical prevention of MDRPI. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Database, and China BioMedical Literature Database (CBM) (from inception to January 2023) for studies that identified risk factors of MDRPI in ICU patients. In order to avoid the omission of relevant literature, we performed a secondary search of the above database on February 15, 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.3. Fifteen studies involving 4850 participants were selected to analyze risk factors for MDRPI in ICU patients. While conducting a meta-analysis, we used sensitivity analysis to ensure the reliability of the results for cases with significant heterogeneity among studies. When the source of heterogeneity cannot be determined, we only described the risk factor. The risk factors for MDRPI in ICU patients were elder age (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.10), diabetes mellitus (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.96-5.21), edema (OR = 3.62, 95% CI: 2.31-5.67), lower Braden scale score (OR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.11-1.33), higher SOFA score (OR = 4.21, 95%CI: 2.38-7.47), higher APACHE II score (OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.15-1.64), longer usage time of medical devices (OR = 1.11, 95%CI: 1.05-1.19), use of vasoconstrictors (OR = 6.07, 95%CI: 3.15-11.69), surgery (OR = 4.36, 95% CI: 2.07-9.15), prone position (OR = 24.71, 95% CI: 7.34-83.15), and prone position ventilation (OR = 17.51, 95% CI: 5.86-52.36). Furthermore, we found that ICU patients who used subglottic suction catheters had a higher risk of MDRPI, whereas ICU patients with higher hemoglobin and serum albumin levels had a lower risk of MDRPI. This study reported the risk factors for MDRPI in ICU patients. A comprehensive analysis of these risk factors will help to prevent and optimize interventions, thereby minimizing the occurrence of MDRPI.

Incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries in the intensive care unit and related risk factors

AimAt present, physicians employ medical devices extensively in the treatment of numerous diseases and in the care and follow-up of patients. However, these medical devices are a potential cause of pressure injuries.The study aimed to investigate the incidence and affecting risk factors of medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) in an adult intensive care unit. Materials and methodsThis is a longitudinal descriptive/analytical and cross-sectional study. The researchers conducted this study with 213 intensive care patients between 15.06.2021 and 15.12.2021. The skin and mucosa under and around each medical device were observed once a day for MDRPIs during the stay of patients who had been hospitalized in the intensive care unit for at least 24 h. The data were collected using Patient Information Form developed by the researchers based on the literature, Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Monitoring Form, the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Area Risk Calculator (Jackson/Cubbin BARHATr)-Turkish Version, the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Pressure Injury Staging System and the Glasgow Coma Scale. ResultsThe incidence of MDRPIs was 28.6% (61/213). The study revealed that 48.4% (46/95) of these injuries were caused by medical devices for respiratory system, 26.3% (25/95) by devices for gastrointestinal and genitourinary system. The study also revealed that 70.5% of MDRPIs occurred on the skin and 29.5% on the mucosal membrane, and that 82.1% of the MDRPIs occurring on the skin were at Stage 1. In terms of anatomical location, 21.1% of these injuries developed on the fingers and 13.7% on the mouth/lip. In multivariate analysis, parenteral + enteral (p = 0.006, OR = 0.083, 95%CI = [0.014–0.497]) and oral nutrition (p = 0.037, OR = 0.210, 95%CI = [0.049–0.908]), a higher number of devices (nine or more) (p = 0.002, OR = 5.387, 95%CI = [1.840–15.772]) and the duration of device wear (p < 0.05) were identified as independent risk factors for the occurrence of MDRPIs. ConclusionsThe study showed that the incidence of MDRPIs was relatively high and was associated with various factors. It is critical for intensive care nurses, who encounter MDRPIs more frequently, to consider these factors while caring for their patients and to take appropriate preventive measures to reduce the incidence of these injuries.

Preventing Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries

Pressure injuries (PIs) are a common, yet preventable complication of patient care. 1 Dang W Liu Y Zhou Q et al. Risk factors of medical device-related pressure injury in intensive care units. J Clin Nurs. 2022; 31: 1174-1183https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15974 Crossref Scopus (14) Google Scholar ,2 Hajhosseini B Longaker MT Gurtner GC Pressure injury. Ann Surg. 2020; 271: 671-679https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003567 Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar Regulatory, quality, and health care bodies view the frequency of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) as indicative of the quality of nursing care and take the issue of HAPIs very seriously in terms of patient safety. 3 Pittman J Otts JA Riley B Mulekar MS Pressure injury prevention and management: a gap analysis using key stakeholder engagement. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022; 49: 416-427https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000906 Crossref Scopus (0) Google Scholar Every year, approximately 2.5 million people develop HAPIs, and approximately 60,000 people die as a result of these injuries. 3 Pittman J Otts JA Riley B Mulekar MS Pressure injury prevention and management: a gap analysis using key stakeholder engagement. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022; 49: 416-427https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000906 Crossref Scopus (0) Google Scholar ,4 Padula WV Delarmente BA The national cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in the United States. Int Wound J. 2019; 16: 634-640https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13071 Crossref PubMed Scopus (207) Google Scholar The total cost of HAPI care per patient ranges from $29,900 to $151,700, resulting in an estimated annual cost of $26.8 billion. 3 Pittman J Otts JA Riley B Mulekar MS Pressure injury prevention and management: a gap analysis using key stakeholder engagement. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022; 49: 416-427https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000906 Crossref Scopus (0) Google Scholar ,5 Tschannen D Anderson C The pressure injury predictive model: a framework for hospital-acquired pressure injuries. J Clin Nurs. 2020; 29: 1398-1421https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15171 Crossref Scopus (14) Google Scholar Despite the introduction of new technology and HAPI prevention strategies, the occurrence of HAPI is still on the rise. 2 Hajhosseini B Longaker MT Gurtner GC Pressure injury. Ann Surg. 2020; 271: 671-679https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003567 Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar ,3 Pittman J Otts JA Riley B Mulekar MS Pressure injury prevention and management: a gap analysis using key stakeholder engagement. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022; 49: 416-427https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000906 Crossref Scopus (0) Google Scholar People suffering from this injury can experience severe discomfort, a decrease in their overall quality of life, reduced activity, decreased productivity, social alienation, depression, and increased length of stay. 2 Hajhosseini B Longaker MT Gurtner GC Pressure injury. Ann Surg. 2020; 271: 671-679https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003567 Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar

The nursing care for the medical device related pressure injury patient with a mucosal pressure injury due to an endotracheal tube: a case report

BACKGROUND: Pressure injury (PI) due to medical devices is one of the most common PIs, especially in patients treated in intensive care. Medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs), as part of their treatment, require extra care and prevention interventions than injuries caused by immobilization. Standardized nursing models are needed to care for PIs caused by medical devices on mucous membranes. PURPOSE: To provide information about the evaluation and care of the MDRPIs in the mucosal membrane due to the endotracheal tube (ET). CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old male with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and coronavirus disease has MDRPIs on the lower lip edge due to the ET on the fifteenth day after intubation. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) diagnoses were determined by systematically analyzing the data using the Gordon’s Functional Health Patterns (GFHP) model in the patient. Nursing care was planned and applied in line with the determined NANDA diagnoses, Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) interventions, and using the recommendations of current PI guides for treatment of MDRPIs. CONCLUSION: This case report illustrates MDRPIs resulting from ET and provides information about the formation of MDRPIs and appropriate maintenance therapy. Future research is recommended to examine and evaluate the nursing care and outcome of MDRPIs in different mucosal membranes.