Academic Medical Institution Research Articles

Preferred Feedback Styles Among Different Groups in an Academic Medical Center

IntroductionFeedback is an essential component in complex work environments. Different generations have been shown to have different sets of values, derived from societal and cultural changes. We hypothesize that generational differences may be associated with preferred feedback patterns among medical trainees and faculty in a large academic institution. MethodsA survey was distributed to all students, residents/fellows, and faculty at a large academic medical institution from April 2020 through June 2020. Survey questions evaluated feedback methods for six domains: preparedness, performance, attitude, technical procedures, inpatient, and outpatient care. Participants selected a preferred feedback method for each category. Patient demographics and survey responses were described using frequency statistics. We compared differences in feedback preferences based on generation and field of practice. ResultsA total of 871 participants completed the survey. Preferred feedback patterns in the medical field do not seem to align with sociologic theories of generational gaps. Most participants preferred to receive direct feedback after an activity away from their team, irrespective of their age or medical specialty. Individuals preferred direct feedback during an activity in front of their team only for technical procedures. Compared to nonsurgeons, surgeons were more likely to prefer direct feedback in front of team members for preparedness, performance, and attitude. ConclusionsGenerational membership is not significantly associated with preferred feedback patterns in this complex medical academic environment. Variations in feedback preferences are associated with field of practice that may be due to specialty-specific differences in culture and personality traits present within certain medical specialties, particularly surgery.

MP66-10 VARIABILITY IN PARENTAL LEAVE POLICIES FOR UROLOGY RESIDENTS ACROSS UNITED STATES ACADEMIC MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP66-10 VARIABILITY IN PARENTAL LEAVE POLICIES FOR UROLOGY RESIDENTS ACROSS UNITED STATES ACADEMIC MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS Alice Chu, Farah Abaza, Simone Thavaseelan, Lindsey Hartsell, and Akanksha Mehta Alice ChuAlice Chu More articles by this author , Farah AbazaFarah Abaza More articles by this author , Simone ThavaseelanSimone Thavaseelan More articles by this author , Lindsey HartsellLindsey Hartsell More articles by this author , and Akanksha MehtaAkanksha Mehta More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003329.10AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Parental leave is a significant consideration for resident physicians when considering family planning during training. While the American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) recently mandated a 6-week paid parental leave policy, there is no standardized parental leave policy across urology residency programs. This study sought to evaluate the availability and accessibility of parental leave for urology residents at academic medical institutions in the United States. METHODS: A non-validated 8-question survey was developed to capture the current status of parental leave policies (e.g. duration of leave, maternal vs paternal leave, birth vs adoptive children, compensation status). All ACGME-accredited urology residency programs were contacted via email. Data were collected via telephone/video interview, email, or online survey response. Program characteristics and demographic information were collected from the residency program website and Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access (FREIDA). Fisher’s exact test was used to determine association between program characteristics and favorable parental leave policies (i.e., >6 weeks). RESULTS: We successfully contacted 132 (93.6%) academic urology programs. A total of 35 (27%) programs responded. Maximum allowed weeks of parental leave ranged 3-18 weeks for birthing parents (median 6 weeks, mean 8.26+/-3.78 weeks) and 0-18 weeks for non-birthing parents (median 6 weeks, mean 7.06+/-3.83 weeks). Most institutions provided fully paid leave and did not require exhaustion of other time away from training (i.e., vacation or sick leave; 74.3% and 71.4% respectively). Having >30% female faculty was associated with resident parental leave time >6 weeks (OR 10.3, p<0.05). Geographic region, program type (university- vs community-based), program size, number of program years, and resident gender complement were not associated with parental leave time. CONCLUSIONS: There is large variability in the maximum amount of parental leave allowed and amount of paid leave among academic urology residency programs across the United States. Standardization of these policies may increase equity across urology residencies in the U.S. and alleviate fears of financial burden and need to extend training. Source of Funding: N/A © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e935 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Alice Chu More articles by this author Farah Abaza More articles by this author Simone Thavaseelan More articles by this author Lindsey Hartsell More articles by this author Akanksha Mehta More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Diagnosis Related Groups of Patients Admitted from an Urban Academic Medical Center to a Virtual Hybrid Hospital-at-Home Program.

The diagnosis related group (DRG) is used as an economic patient classification system based on clinical characteristics, hospital stay, and treatment costs. Mayo Clinic's virtual hybrid hospital-at-home program, advanced care at home (ACH), offers high-acuity home inpatient care for a variety of diagnosis. This study aimed to determine the DRGs admitted to the ACH program at an urban academic center. A retrospective study was performed on all patients discharged from the ACH program at Mayo Clinic Florida from July 6, 2020, to February 1, 2022. DRG data were extracted from the Electronic Health Record (EHR). Categorization of DRG was done by systems. The ACH program discharged 451 patients with DRGs. Categorization of the DRG demonstrated that the most frequent code assigned corresponded to respiratory infections (20.2%), followed by septicemia (12.9%), heart failure (8.9%), renal failure (4.9%), and cellulitis (4.0%). The ACH program covers a wide range of high-acuity diagnosis across multiple medical specialties at its urban academic medical campus, including respiratory infections, severe sepsis, congestive heart failure, and renal failure, all with major complications or comorbidities. The ACH model of care may be useful in taking care of patients with similar diagnosis at other urban academic medical institutions.

Perceptions About Augmented Reality in Remote Medical Care: Interview Study of Emergency Telemedicine Providers.

Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) have increasingly appeared in the medical literature in the past decade, with AR recently being studied for its potential role in remote health care delivery and communication. Recent literature describes AR's implementation in real-time telemedicine contexts across multiple specialties and settings, with remote emergency services in particular using AR to enhance disaster support and simulation education. Despite the introduction of AR in the medical literature and its potential to shape the future of remote medical services, studies have yet to investigate the perspectives of telemedicine providers regarding this novel technology. This study aimed to understand the applications and challenges of AR in telemedicine anticipated by emergency medicine providers with a range of experiences in using telemedicine and AR or VR technology. Across 10 academic medical institutions, 21 emergency medicine providers with variable exposures to telemedicine and AR or VR technology were recruited for semistructured interviews via snowball sampling. The interview questions focused on various potential uses of AR, anticipated obstacles that prevent its implementation in the telemedicine area, and how providers and patients might respond to its introduction. We included video demonstrations of a prototype using AR during the interviews to elicit more informed and complete insights regarding AR's potential in remote health care. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed via thematic coding. Our study identified 2 major areas of use for AR in telemedicine. First, AR is perceived to facilitate information gathering by enhancing observational tasks such as visual examination and granting simultaneous access to data and remote experts. Second, AR is anticipated to supplement distance learning of both minor and major procedures and nonprocedural skills such as cue recognition and empathy for patients and trainees. AR may also supplement long-distance education programs and thereby support less specialized medical facilities. However, the addition of AR may exacerbate the preexisting financial, structural, and literacy barriers to telemedicine. Providers seek value demonstrated by extensive research on the clinical outcome, satisfaction, and financial benefits of AR. They also seek institutional support and early training before adopting novel tools such as AR. Although an overall mixed reception is anticipated, consumer adoption and awareness are key components in AR's adoption. AR has the potential to enhance the ability to gather observational and medical information, which would serve a diverse set of applications in remote health care delivery and education. However, AR faces obstacles similar to those faced by the current telemedicine technology, such as lack of access, infrastructure, and familiarity. This paper discusses the potential areas of investigation that would inform future studies and approaches to implementing AR in telemedicine.

Defining “Access to Care” for dermatology at academic medical institutions

Defining “Access to Care” for dermatology at academic medical institutions

Novel MKRN3 Missense Mutations Associated With Central Precocious Puberty Reveal Distinct Effects on Ubiquitination.

Loss-of-function mutations in the maternally imprinted genes, MKRN3 and DLK1, are associated with central precocious puberty (CPP). Mutations in MKRN3 are the most common known genetic etiology of CPP. This work aimed to screen patients with CPP for MKRN3 and DLK1 mutations and analyze the effects of identified mutations on protein function in vitro. Participants included 84 unrelated children with CPP (79 girls, 5 boys) and, when available, their first-degree relatives. Five academic medical institutions participated. Sanger sequencing of MKRN3 and DLK1 5' upstream flanking and coding regions was performed on DNA extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes. Western blot analysis was performed to assess protein ubiquitination profiles. Eight heterozygous MKRN3 mutations were identified in 9 unrelated girls with CPP. Five are novel missense mutations, 2 were previously identified in patients with CPP, and 1 is a frameshift variant not previously associated with CPP. No pathogenic variants were identified in DLK1. Girls with MKRN3 mutations had an earlier age of initial pubertal signs and higher basal serum luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone compared to girls with CPP without MRKN3 mutations. Western blot analysis revealed that compared to wild-type MKRN3, mutations within the RING finger domain reduced ubiquitination whereas the mutations outside this domain increased ubiquitination. MKRN3 mutations were present in 10.7% of our CPP cohort, consistent with previous studies. The novel identified mutations in different domains of MKRN3 revealed different patterns of ubiquitination, suggesting distinct molecular mechanisms by which the loss of MRKN3 results in early pubertal onset.

Analysis of Incidentally Found Proliferative Lesions in Oncoplastic and Macromastia Breast Reductions.

Reduction mammaplasty pathologic specimens can reveal incidentally found proliferative lesions. However, there is a lack of data investigating the comparative incidences and risk factors for such lesions. A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutively performed reduction mammaplasty cases at a single large academic medical institution in a metropolitan city by two plastic surgeons over a 2-year period. All reduction mammaplasties, symmetrizing reductions, and oncoplastic reductions performed were included. There were no exclusion criteria. A total of 632 breasts were analyzed-502 reduction mammaplasties, 85 symmetrizing reductions, and 45 oncoplastic reductions-in 342 patients. Mean age was 43.9 ± 15.9 years, mean body mass index was 29.2 ± 5.7 kg/m 2 , and mean reduction weight was 610.0 ± 313.1 g. Patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty for benign macromastia had a significantly lower incidence (3.6%) of incidentally found breast cancers and proliferative lesions compared with patients with oncoplastic reductions (13.3%) and symmetrizing reductions (17.6%) ( P < 0.001). On univariate analysis, personal history of breast cancer ( P < 0.001), first-degree family history of breast cancer ( P = 0.008), age ( P < 0.001), and tobacco use ( P = 0.033) were all statistically significant risk factors. Using a backward elimination stepwise reduced multivariable logistic regression model for risk factors associated with breast cancer or proliferative lesions, age ( P < 0.001) was the only retained significant risk factor. Proliferative lesions and carcinomas of the breast found in reduction mammaplasty pathologic specimens may be more common than previously reported. The incidence of newly found proliferative lesions was significantly lower in cases of benign macromastia compared with oncoplastic and symmetrizing reductions. Risk, II.

The Culture and Justice Quorum at University of California, San Diego: A Departmental Approach to Dismantling Structural Racism.

Structural racism is embedded within the structure and function of academic medical institutions. Although many institutions have begun to incorporate racial justice within academic medicine, it needs to be integral to every discipline and all aspects of medical education, research, and health system practice. Guidance is lacking, however, on how to create and sustain department-level action to shift culture and encourage antiracist work. To address the culture, uphold racial justice, and address the challenges of racism in medicine with dynamic and innovative solutions, the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at University of California, San Diego, formed a Culture and Justice Quorum (the Quorum) in September 2020. All department faculty, residents, fellows, and staff were invited to participate in the Quorum as ambassadors who commit to meet and facilitate Quorum work or as supporters who pledge Quorum support without regular meeting participation. In all, 153 of 155 invited individuals (98.7%) responded, with 36 (23.2%) requesting to participate as ambassadors and 117 (75.5%) as supporters. Quorum ambassadors have worked together to assess the climate of the department, university, and health system, including incorporating input and amplifying efforts of the department's resident leadership council. The Quorum has implemented initiatives to promote health equity and developed a report card to demonstrate activities, monitor progress, and ensure accountability. Through the innovative Culture and Justice Quorum, the department aims to address structural racism, foster justice, and dismantle the foundational injustices embedded within departmental clinical, educational, and research work and within the wider culture. The Quorum offers a model for creating and sustaining department-level action to shift culture and encourage antiracist work. Since established, it has received institutional recognition, including receiving the 2022 Inclusive Excellent Award for Department-Organizational Unit, which recognizes outstanding institutional contributions for inclusion and diversity efforts.

Disparities in germline testing by race/ethnicity and preferred language in patients with prostate cancer.

112 Background: A remote Genetic Testing Station (GTS) workflow was implemented at an academic medical institution to expand access to genetic testing for patients with prostate cancer. During a telephone appointment, a genetic counselor assistant collects family history and facilitates genetics education, research consent, and remote sample collection for multi-gene panel testing. We compared testing completion and patient loss from workflow based on race/ethnicity and preferred language to identify disparities. Methods: Metrics were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively for patients with metastatic or high-grade prostate cancer referred to genetics between 3/15/2020 – 6/30/2022. Self-reported race, ethnicity, and preferred language were collected by chart review. Testing completion was compared between groups using Fisher’s exact test, with White non-Hispanic (WNH) and Preferred Language English (PLE) cohorts as controls. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Patient loss at workflow checkpoints (scheduling, consenting, sample collection, and results release) was summarized for each group. Results: 827 eligible patients were identified: 78 (9%) Asian /Pacific Islander (API), 51 (6%) Black non-Hispanic (BNH), 42 (5%) Hispanic, and 625 (76%) WNH. 31 patients reporting other non-Hispanic race were not included in the analysis. 30 patients (4%) self-reported Preferred Language non-English (PLNE) and 797 (96%) PLE. BNH patients were significantly less likely to complete testing compared to WNH patients (OR 0.320, 95%CI: 0.168, 0.632, p&lt;0.001). There was no difference in testing completion in API (OR 0.918, 95%CI: 0.467, 1.944, p=0.797) or Hispanic (OR 0.743, 95%CI: 0.325, 1.918, p=0.466) compared to WNH patients. PLNE were significantly less likely to complete testing (OR 0.393, 95%CI: 0.171, 0.965, p=0.016) compared to PLE patients. Patient loss occurred primarily at consenting and sample collection. 14% of BNH, and 9% of Hispanic patients did not consent, compared to 4% of WNH. 17% of PLNE did not consent compared to 5% of PLE patients. 13% of BNH did not return a sample, compared to 3% of WNH patients. Conclusions: In remote GTS, BNH and PLNE patients were significantly less likely to complete germline testing than WNH and PLE patients respectively. Disparities in patient loss were most pronounced at consenting and sample collection. Measures to mitigate disparities include assisted consenting (with interpreter as needed) and video-assisted or in-clinic sample collection. [Table: see text]

Presenting Features of Giant Cell Arteritis with Active Versus Healed Arteritis on Biopsy

ABSTRACT Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is often categorised as ”active” or ”healed” on temporal artery biopsy (TAB). The purpose of this study was to compare the initial clinical presentation of patients with GCA according to active versus healed arteritis on TAB. A retrospective chart review was performed for patients with biopsy-proven GCA (BP-GCA) at a single academic medical institution from a previously reported cohort. The arteritis on TAB was categorised as “active” or “healed” based on the pathological reports. Demographic information, clinical presentation, past medical history, and test results were collected from the date of TAB. These baseline characteristics were entered into the GCA Risk Calculator. Of 85 patients with BP-GCA, 80% had active and 20% had healed disease according to histopathology. A higher percentage of those with active arteritis had ischaemic optic neuropathy (ION) (36% versus 6%, p = .03), elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rates (92% versus 63%, p = .01), elevated C-reactive protein levels (79% versus 46%, p = .049), GCA risk score > 7.5% (99% sensitivity, 100% versus 71%, p < .001), higher mean GCA risk calculator scores (neural network p = .001; logistic regression p = .002). Patients with healed arteritis were less likely to have visual manifestations than the active arteritis group (38% versus 71%, p = .04). Patients with active vasculitis on biopsy had higher rates of ION and elevated inflammatory markers, as well as higher predictive scores from the GCA risk calculator. Further research is needed regarding correlation of biopsy findings and risk of complications or relapses.

Intratympanic Botulinum Toxin Injection as a New Therapeutic Modality for Middle Ear Myoclonic Tinnitus.

Middle ear myoclonic tinnitus (MEMT) is a disease caused by myoclonus or abnormal contractive movement of middle ear muscles (MEMs). This translational study was conducted to propose intratympanic botulinum toxin (IT-BTX) injection as a new therapeutic modality to treat MEMT. Animal experiment and nonrandomized controlled clinical trial. Laboratory and medical center of an academic tertiary medical institution. For the animal study, male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 4 subgroups according to the sacrificing day after IT-BTX injection. After initial hearing tests, randomly assigned experimental ears were intratympanically injected with 1 unit/100 μL of BTX-A, whereas control ears were injected with normal saline. Changes in the hearing thresholds, morphometry of the cochleae, electron microscopy study, and immunofluorescence analysis of MEMs were evaluated. For the human study, 10 intractable MEMT patients were enrolled. The hearing thresholds and the degree of tinnitus distress were observed for changes after IT-BTX injection. All patients were followed up for 3 months. As for the animal study, there were no significant changes in hearing thresholds and cochlear morphologies in all 4 subgroups of the rats. Significant MEM degenerations and immuno-detection of cleaved synaptosome-associated protein of 25 kDa (cSNAP-25) indicated the efficacy of IT-BTX. MEMT patients enrolled for the pilot clinical trial showed statistically significant improvement in tinnitus after IT-BTX injection. No major complications were noted. The new therapeutic modality of IT-BTX injection for the treatment of MEMT seems highly promising with an excellent result.

Building diverse leadership in an academic medical center: The ACCLAIM program

As healthcare systems become more complex, medical education needs to adapt in many ways. There is a growing need for more formal leadership learning for healthcare providers, including greater attention to health disparities. An important challenge in addressing health disparities is ensuring inclusive excellence in the leadership of healthcare systems and medical education. Women and those who are underrepresented in medicine (URMs) have historically had fewer opportunities for leadership development and are less likely to hold leadership roles and receive promotions. One successful initiative for improved learning of medical leadership—presented as a case example here—is the Academic Career Leadership Academy in Medicine (ACCLAIM) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine. ACCLAIM is uniquely designed for faculty identified as having emerging leadership potential, with an emphasis on women and URMs. Using a leadership learning system approach, annual cohorts of participants (Scholars) interactively participate in a multi-faceted nine-month long learning experience, including group (e.g., guest-speaker weekly presentations and exercises) and individual learning components (e.g., an individual leadership project). Since its initiation in 2012 and through 2021, 111 Scholars have participated in ACCLAIM; included were 57% women and 27% URMs. Two important outcomes described are: short-term impact as illustrated by consistent improvements in quantitively measured leadership knowledge and capabilities; and long-term leadership growth, whereby half of the ACCLAIM graduates have received academic rank promotions and almost two-thirds have achieved new leadership opportunities, with even higher percentages observed for women and URMs; for example, 87% of URMs were either promoted or achieved new leadership positions. Also consistently noted, through qualitative assessments, are broader healthcare system knowledge and shared tactics for addressing common challenges among Scholars. This case example shows that the promotion of leadership equity may jointly enhance professional development while creating opportunities for systems change within academic medical centers. Such an approach can be a potential model for academic medical institutions and other healthcare schools seeking to promote leadership equity and inclusion.

The Association Between Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery–Guided Analgesics and Postoperative Delirium

Delirium is a common postoperative complication associated with death and long-term cognitive impairment. The authors studied the association between opioid-sparing anesthetics, incorporating Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS)-guided analgesics and postoperative delirium. The authors performed a retrospective review of nonemergent coronary, valve, or ascending aorta surgery patients. A tertiary academic medical institution. The study authors analyzed a dataset of elective adult cardiac surgical patients. All patients ≥18 years undergoing elective cardiac surgery from November 2, 2017 until February 2, 2021 were eligible for inclusion. The ERACS-guided multimodal pain regimen included preoperative oral acetaminophen and gabapentin, and intraoperative intravenous lidocaine, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine. Delirium was measured by bedside nurses using the Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit (ICU). Delirium occurred in 220 of the 1,675 patients (13.7%). The use of any component of the multimodal pain regimen was not associated with delirium (odds ratio [OR]: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.63-1.16]). Individually, acetaminophen was associated with reduced odds of delirium (OR: 0.60 [95% CI: 0.37-0.95]). Gabapentin (OR: 1.36 [95% CI: 0.97-2.21]), lidocaine (OR: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.53-1.37]), ketamine (OR: 1.15 [95% CI: 0.72-1.83]), and dexmedetomidine (OR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.46-1.31]) were not individually associated with postoperative delirium. Individual ERACS elements were associated with secondary outcomes of hospital length of stay, ICU duration, postoperative opioid administration, and postoperative intubation duration. The use of an opioid-sparing perioperative ERACS pain regimen was not associated with reduced postoperative delirium, opioid consumption, or additional poor outcomes. Individually, acetaminophen was associated with reduced delirium.

Adjuvant trastuzumab and vinorelbine for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer.

The single-arm phase II APT trial established trastuzumab and paclitaxel (TH) as the standard adjuvant regimen for small human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) tumors. However, paclitaxel causes alopecia and has high rates of neuropathy and hypersensitivity reactions. In patients with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer (BC), the combination of trastuzumab and vinorelbine (TV) is effective and well tolerated. There is a need for alternative non-anthracycline/taxane-based regimens for patients with HER2+ early-stage BC, especially for those with contraindications or who wish to avoid side effects of taxane-based regimens. Here we describe our institutional experience with adjuvant TV for patients with early-stage HER2+ BC. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes of patients with localized HER2+ BC treated with adjuvant TV from 2007 to 2021 at a large academic medical institution were collected. Study endpoints included invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), overall survival (OS), and safety/tolerability. IDFS and OS were measured from start date of TV treatment to date of event/last follow-up and date of death/last follow-up, respectively. A total of 30 patients were treated with TV. All patients received trastuzumab at standard dosing and vinorelbine at a starting dose of 25 mg/m2 either on days 1/8 or on days 1/8/21 (weekly) of a 21-day cycle with four planned cycles. Median age at diagnosis was 59 years (range: 36-81). 90.3% of patients had anatomic pathologic stage IA BC and 9.7% stage IIA BC. Of the 30 patients, 24 of them opted to pursue TV due to concerns related to alopecia, neuropathy, and other toxicities, and 6 switched from treatment with TH to TV due to toxicities. Eight patients experienced neutropenia with no cases of febrile neutropenia. No patients experienced alopecia or long-term neuropathy. With a median follow-up of 68 months (5.7 years), the 5-year IDFS rate was 90.9%, with one local and one distant recurrence. The 5-year OS was 100%. Trastuzumab in combination with vinorelbine in the adjuvant, early-stage setting for low-risk HER2+ BC demonstrated clinical efficacy and appeared to be well tolerated. TV warrants further evaluation as an alternative regimen to TH for patients with early-stage HER2+ BC.

Time to act: A rubric-based approach for institutionalizing justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion.

Attacks on minoritized communities and increasing awareness of the societal causes of health disparities have combined to highlight deep systemic inequities. In response, academic health centers have prioritized justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (JEDI) in their strategic goals. To have a sustained impact, JEDI efforts cannot be siloed; rather, they must be woven into the fabric of our work and systematically assessed to promote meaningful outcomes and accountability. To this end, the University of Pittsburgh's Institute for Clinical Research Education assembled a task force to create and apply a rubric to identify short and long-term JEDI goals, assess the current state of JEDI at our Institute, and make recommendations for immediate action. To ensure deep buy-in, we gathered input from diverse members of our academic community, who served on targeted subcommittees. We then applied a three-step process to ensure rapid forward progress. We emerged with concrete actions for priority focus and a plan for ongoing assessment of JEDI institutionalization. We believe our process and rubric offer a scalable and adaptable model for other institutions and departments to follow as we work together across academic medical institutions to put our justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion goals into meaningful action.

Feeding and Swallowing Characteristics of Children With Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula.

This study aimed to characterize feeding/swallowing difficulties in children with esophageal atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) and evaluate associations among feeding difficulties, pharyngeal dysphagia (PD), and other aerodigestive evaluation findings. This was a retrospective cohort study of feeding/swallowing characteristics of 44 patients with EA/TEF treated in the aerodigestive program of a single academic medical institution from 2010 to 2015. Demographics, comorbidities, presence and characteristics of feeding/swallowing difficulties, and results of relevant diagnostic tests [videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS), clinical feeding evaluations (CFEs), chest computerized tomography (CT) scans, pulmonary bronchoscopies, and upper GI (UGI)/esophagrams] were reviewed. Fifty percent of the cohort had PD and 88.6% had feeding difficulties. Across 118 encounters (87 VFSS and 31 CFEs), feeding difficulties suggestive of esophageal dysphagia were most frequently seen in children over 48 months and feeding difficulties suggestive of developmental feeding problems were most frequently seen in children from 24 to 48 months. Abnormal findings were present in 59.8% of VFSS, with aspiration (34.5%) and pharyngeal residue (26.4%) the most frequently observed signs of dysphagia. Abnormal UGI/esophagram findings were not associated with significantly increased risk of feeding difficulties during visits within 3 months (risk ratio, RR = 1.33). Presence of dysphagia was associated with increased risk for some abnormal CT findings (RR= 3.0 for airspace and 3.0 for bronchiectasis). Feeding/swallowing difficulties are common in EA/TEF, and types of feeding difficulties vary by patient age. The presence of abnormal findings on UGI/esophagram did not increase the risk of feeding complaints; however, the presence of dysphagia increased the risk of abnormal chest CT.

Fellow Efficiency During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improves Over Time, Yet Is Less Than Experienced Physician Assistant But With No Significant Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes

To evaluate the intraoperative efficiency and patient outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) assisted by a sports medicine fellow over the course of the academic year compared with an experienced physician assistant (PA). A single-surgeon cohort of primary ACLRs with either bone-tendon-bone autograft or bone-tendon-bone allograft (without any other significant time-consuming procedures such as meniscectomy/repair) were evaluated using a patient registry system over 2 years assisted by an experienced PA compared with an orthopaedic surgery sports medicine fellow. There were 264 primary ACLRs included in this study. Outcomes included evaluation of surgical time, tourniquet time, and patient-reported outcome measures. The surgical efficiency of the fellow (as measured by surgical time and tourniquet time) improved over each academic quarter. Patient-reported outcomes between the 2 first-assist groups showed no significant difference over 2 years with both ACL graft groups combined. ACLRs assisted by the PA showed shorter tourniquet times by 22.1% and shorter total surgical times by 11.9% compared with the sports medicine fellows when both grafts were combined (P < .001). The surgical and tourniquet times (minutes) for the fellow (standard deviation of surgical time 19.5-25.0 and tourniquet time 19.5-25.0) did not average out to be more efficient in any of the 4 quarters of the year compared with the PA-assisted group (standard deviation of surgical time 14.4-14.8 and tourniquet time 14.8-22.4). Autografts showed more efficient tourniquet (18.7%) and skin-to-skin surgical times (11.1%) in the PA group compared with the fellow group (P < .001). Allografts showed more efficient tourniquet (37.7%) and skin-to-skin surgical times (12.8%) in the PA group compared with the fellow group (P < .001). The surgical efficiency of the fellow during primary ACLRs improves over the academic year. Patient-reported outcomes are similar in cases assisted by the fellow compared with an experienced physician assistant. Cases assisted by the PA were performed more efficiently compared with the sports medicine fellow. The intraoperative efficiency of a sports medicine fellow objectively improves over the academic year for primary ACLRs but may not be as efficient as an experienced advanced practice provider; however, there appears to be no significant differences in patient-reported outcome measures between the 2 groups. This helps quantify the time commitment for attendings and academic medical institutions as the "cost of education" of trainees such as fellows.

Evaluating YouTube videos on sialendoscopy as an educational resource for patients.

Patients are increasingly relying on YouTube for health information. We objectively evaluated the quality and comprehensiveness of sialendoscopy YouTube videos available to patients. We further investigated the relationship between video content and video popularity. We identified 150 videos using the search term "sialendoscopy." Videos were excluded if they were lectures for medical professionals, operating room (OR) recordings, unrelated, non-English, or non-audio. Video quality and comprehensiveness were evaluated using modified DISCERN criterion (range: 5-25) and novel sialendoscopy criterion (NSC, range: 0-7), respectively. Secondary outcomes included standard video metrics and Video Power Index to measure popularity. Videos were classified binarily by uploader type as from an academic medical center or from other sources. Twenty-two (14.7%) of 150 videos were included for review, with 7 (31.8%) uploaded from academic medical institutions. One hundred-nine (72.7%) videos were excluded as lectures for medical professionals or OR recordings. Overall mean modified DISCERN (13.45 ± 3.42) and NSC (3.05 ± 0.96) scores were low; however, videos uploaded by academic medical institutions were significantly more comprehensive (NSC mean difference=0.98, 95% CI: 0.16-1.80, p=.02). There were no significant correlations between video popularity and objective measures of quality or comprehensiveness. This study highlights the paucity and low quality of sialendoscopy videos for patients. More popular videos are not higher quality, and most videos are targeted more toward physicians rather than patients. As YouTube becomes increasingly used by patients, there is opportunity for otolaryngologists to produce more informative videos for patients while implementing targeted strategies to increase viewership. NA.

Implementation of an Online Reporting System to Identify Unprofessional Behaviors and Mistreatment Directed at Trainees at an Academic Medical Center

Unprofessional behaviors and mistreatment directed at trainees continue to challenge the learning environment. Academic medical institutions should encourage reports of inappropriate behavior and address such reports directly to create a safe learning environment. To determine the feasibility of creating and implementing an online reporting system for receiving and reviewing complaints of unprofessional behavior directed toward or experienced by students, postdoctoral trainees, and residents. This cohort study assessed implementation of an online reporting system (feedback form) with a method for triaging reports, providing both positive and negative feedback, as well as adjudication and transparent public disclosure of aggregate data. The system was launched at a large urban academic medical center with numerous trainees that is fully integrated with a health system of 8 hospitals. Participants included faculty who interact with trainees, medical students, graduate students and postdoctoral fellows, and residents and clinical fellows. Follow-up began in October 2019 (at the time of tool launch) and lasted through December 2021. Data were analyzed from January to March 2022. The primary outcomes were the numbers and types of reports according to the reporter and the person reported about. Participants included 2900 faculty who interact with trainees, 600 medical students, more than 1000 graduate students and postdoctoral fellows, and 2600 residents and clinical fellows. Trainees submitted 196 reports, 173 (88.3%) of which described unprofessional interactions. Among the reports describing unprofessional behavior, 60 (34.7%) were from medical students, 96 (55.5%) were from residents and fellows, 17 (9.8%) were from graduate students or postdoctoral trainees, and 78 (45.1%) were from men. The majority of negative reports described behaviors by faculty (106 [61.3%]), followed by residents and fellows (24 [13.9%]). Twenty faculty (<1.0%) accounted for 52 (50.0%) of the 104 reports describing unprofessional behaviors. Since implementation, most trainees are aware of this process. An increasing number have reported instances of mistreatment, and those who shared concerns through the online system report satisfaction with the outcome of the response to the report. In this cohort study, the new reporting mechanism facilitated identification of the small number of individuals associated with unprofessional behaviors toward trainees and increased awareness of the school's commitment to creating a safe learning environment.

Portability of natural language processing methods to detect suicidality from clinical text in US and UK electronic health records.

In the global effort to prevent death by suicide, many academic medical institutions are implementing natural language processing (NLP) approaches to detect suicidality from unstructured clinical text in electronic health records (EHRs), with the hope of targeting timely, preventative interventions to individuals most at risk of suicide. Despite the international need, the development of these NLP approaches in EHRs has been largely local and not shared across healthcare systems. In this study, we developed a process to share NLP approaches that were individually developed at King's College London (KCL), UK and Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM), US - two academic medical centers based in different countries with vastly different healthcare systems. We tested and compared the algorithms' performance on manually annotated clinical notes (KCL: n = 4,911 and WCM = 837). After a successful technical porting of the NLP approaches, our quantitative evaluation determined that independently developed NLP approaches can detect suicidality at another healthcare organization with a different EHR system, clinical documentation processes, and culture, yet do not achieve the same level of success as at the institution where the NLP algorithm was developed (KCL approach: F1-score 0.85 vs. 0.68, WCM approach: F1-score 0.87 vs. 0.72). Independent NLP algorithm development and patient cohort selection at the two institutions comprised direct comparability. Shared use of these NLP approaches is a critical step forward towards improving data-driven algorithms for early suicide risk identification and timely prevention.