Medicaid-insured Individuals Research Articles

M125. DISEASE PREVALENCE, COMORBID CONDITIONS, AND MEDICATION UTILIZATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA IN THE UNITED STATES

BackgroundThe comorbid medical and psychiatric burden for individuals with schizophrenia in the United States is substantial compared with the general population. This study sourced the IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases to examine disease prevalence, comorbid conditions, and drug treatments in a large population of commercial- or Medicaid-insured individuals with schizophrenia in the United States to characterize this patient population.MethodsA retrospective cross-sectional claims analysis from the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases and the Multi-state Medicaid Database from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2016 was conducted. Individuals with dual coverage for commercial and Medicare Supplemental were included within the commercial analysis. Schizophrenia cases were defined by ≥1 diagnostic claim (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM]/ICD-10-CM) for schizophrenia anytime during the study period. Comorbidities were assessed by ≥1 ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM diagnosis code, grouped into clinically meaningful categories according to the Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) level 2 categories. For the comorbidity analysis, within each database, schizophrenia cases were matched with controls along several demographic characteristics. Case-control comorbidity comparisons were performed using prevalence rate ratios (PRRs) and 95% confidence intervals. Medication exposure was assessed for cases only within each database and was based on ≥1 National Drug Code (NDC) occurring in the outpatient setting grouped by Redbook classification.ResultsSchizophrenia prevalence was 0.99% in Medicaid-insured patients and 0.11% in those with commercial insurance. In both commercial and Medicaid databases, the prevalence of comorbidities was higher among schizophrenia cases as compared with controls in approximately ≥80% of the CCS level 2 categories assessed. Of the top 5 categories of comorbidities across databases for schizophrenia cases, those in common were mood disorders, anxiety disorders, other connective tissue disease, and cardiovascular disease. The comorbidities with the highest case-control PRR point estimates across databases included personality disorders, suicide and intentional self-inflicted injury, and impulse control disorders. Antipsychotics, antidepressants, and analgesics/antipyretics–opiate agonists were the most commonly prescribed medications for schizophrenia cases across databases. Risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and olanzapine were the top 4 antipsychotics prescribed across both databases. The fifth most commonly prescribed antipsychotics were ziprasidone and haloperidol in the commercial and Medicaid databases, respectively.DiscussionThis large-scale database analysis confirmed the burden of medical and psychiatric comorbidities in patients with schizophrenia compared with controls and provided additional insight on treatment approaches in these patients. Understanding the comorbidities affecting this patient population in comparison with the general population highlights the importance of integrated medical and psychiatric care.

"Not Alone Anymore": The Experiences of Adults With Diabetes in New York's Medicaid Health Home Program.

New York State Medicaid's Health Home program is an example of a natural experiment that could affect individuals with diabetes. While evaluations of interventions such as the Health Home program are generally based solely on clinical and administrative data and rarely examine patients' experience, patients may add to the understanding of the intervention's implementation and mechanisms of impact. The objective of this study was to qualitatively examine the health and nonmedical challenges faced by Medicaid-insured patients with diabetes and their experiences with the services provided by New York's Health Homes to address these challenges. We performed 10 focus groups and 23 individual interviews using a guide developed in collaboration with a stakeholder board. We performed a thematic analysis to identify cross-cutting themes. A total of 63 Medicaid-insured individuals with diabetes, 31 of whom were enrolled in New York's Health Home program. While participants were not generally familiar with the term "Health Home," they described and appreciated services consistent with Health Home enrollment delivered by care managers. Services addressed challenges in access to care, especially by facilitating and reminding participants about appointments, and nonmedical needs, such as transportation, housing, and help at home. Participants valued their personal relationships with care managers and the psychosocial support they provided. From the perspective of its enrollees, the Health Home program primarily addressed access to care, but also addressed material and psychosocial needs. These findings have implications for Health Home entities and for research assessing their impact.

Rates of hospitalization for urinary tract infections among medicaid-insured individuals by spina bifida status, Tennessee 2005–2013

BackgroundIndividuals with spina bifida are at increased risk for urinary tract infection (UTI), however there are few population-based investigations of the burden of UTI hospitalizations. ObjectiveWe assessed rates and risk factors for UTI hospitalization in individuals with and without spina bifida. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study to estimate rates of UTI hospitalization by spina bifida status. We included individuals enrolled in Tennessee Medicaid who lived in one of the Emerging Infections Program’s Active Bacterial Surveillance counties between 2005 and 2013. Spina bifida was primarily defined and UTI hospitalizations were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnoses. We also studied a subset without specific health conditions potentially associated with UTI. We used Poisson regression to calculate rate ratios (RR) of UTIs for individuals with versus without spina bifida, adjusting for race, sex and age group. ResultsOver the 9-years, 1,239,362 individuals were included and 2,493 met criteria for spina bifida. Individuals with spina bifida had over a four-fold increased rate of UTI hospitalization than those without spina bifida-in the overall study population and in the subset without specific, high-risk conditions (adjusted rate ratios: 4.41, 95% confidence intervals: 3.03, 6.43) and (4.87, 95% CI: 2.99, 7.92), respectively. We detected differences in rates of UTI hospitalization by race and sex in individuals without spina bifida that were not seen among individuals with spina bifida. ConclusionsIndividuals with spina bifida had increased rates of UTI hospitalizations, and associated demographic patterns differed from those without spina bifida.

Translating research into practice: Protocol for a community-engaged, stepped wedge randomized trial to reduce disparities in breast cancer treatment through a regional patient navigation collaborative

BackgroundRacial and socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer mortality persist. In Boston, MA, Black, Non-Hispanic women and Medicaid-insured individuals are 2–3 times more likely to have delays in treatment compared to White or privately insured women. While evidence-based care coordination strategies for reducing delays exist, they are not systematically implemented across healthcare settings. MethodsTranslating Research Into Practice (TRIP) utilizes community engaged research methods to address breast cancer care delivery disparities. Four Massachusetts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) hubs collaborated with the Boston Breast Cancer Equity Coalition (The Coalition) to implement an evidence-based care coordination intervention for Boston residents at risk for delays in breast cancer care. The Coalition used a community-driven process to define the problem of care delivery disparities, identify the target population, and develop a rigorous pragmatic approach. We chose a cluster-randomized, stepped-wedge hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation study design. The intervention implements three evidence-based strategies: patient navigation services, a shared patient registry for use across academic medical centers, and a web-based social determinants of health platform to identify and address barriers to care. Primary clinical outcomes include time to first treatment and receipt of guideline-concordant treatment, which are captured through electronic health records abstraction. We will use mixed methods to collect the secondary implementation outcomes of acceptability, adoption/penetration, fidelity, sustainability and cost. ConclusionTRIP utilizes an innovative community-driven research strategy, focused on interdisciplinary collaborations, to design and implement a translational science study that aims to more efficiently integrate proven health services interventions into clinical practice.

Age Distribution, Comorbidities and Risk Factors for Thrombosis in Prader-Willi Syndrome.

Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is an imprinting disorder caused by lack of expression of the paternally inherited 15q11.2–q13 chromosome region. The risk of death from obesity-related complications can worsen with age, but survival trends are improving. Comorbidities and their complications such as thrombosis or blood clots and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are uncommon but reported in PWS. Two phases of analyses were conducted in our study: unadjusted and adjusted frequency with odds ratios and a regression analysis of risk factors. Individuals with PWS or non-PWS controls with exogenous obesity were identified by specific International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 diagnostic codes reported on more than one occasion to confirm the diagnosis of PWS or exogenous obesity in available national health claims insurance datasets. The overall average age or average age per age interval (0–17 year, 18–64 year, and 65 year+) and gender distribution in each population were similar in 3136 patients with PWS and 3945 non-PWS controls for comparison purposes, with exogenous obesity identified from two insurance health claims dataset sources (i.e., commercial and Medicare advantage or Medicaid). For example, 65.1% of the 3136 patients with PWS were less than 18 years old (subadults), 33.2% were 18–64 years old (adults), and 1.7% were 65 years or older. After adjusting for comorbidities that were identified with diagnostic codes, we found that commercially insured PWS individuals across all age cohorts were 2.55 times more likely to experience pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) than for obese controls (p-value: 0.013; confidence interval (CI): 1.22–5.32). Medicaid-insured individuals across all age cohorts with PWS were 0.85 times more likely to experience PE or DVT than obese controls (p-value: 0.60; CI: 0.46–1.56), with no indicated age difference. Age and gender were statistically significant predictors of VTEs, and they were independent of insurance coverage. There was an increase in occurrence of thrombotic events across all age cohorts within the PWS patient population when compared with their obese counterparts, regardless of insurance type.

The impact of underinsurance on bladder cancer diagnosis, survival, and care delivery for individuals under the age of 65years.

Health insurance is a key mediator of health care disparities. Outcomes in bladder cancer, one of the costliest diseases to treat, may be especially sensitive to a patient's insurance status. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry and the National Cancer Data Base were used to identify individuals younger than 65years who were diagnosed with bladder cancer from 2007 to 2014. The associations between the insurance status (privately insured, insured by Medicaid, or uninsured) and the following outcomes were evaluated: diagnosis with advanced disease, cancer-specific survival, delay in treatment longer than 90days, treatment in a high-volume hospital, and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Compared with those with private insurance, uninsured and Medicaid-insured individuals were nearly twice as likely to receive a diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (odds ratio [OR] for uninsured individuals, 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70-2.12; OR for Medicaid-insured individuals, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.87-2.20). They were also more likely to die of bladder cancer (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] for uninsured individuals, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.31-1.71; AHR for Medicaid-insured individuals, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.46-1.79). Delays in treatment longer than 90days were more likely for uninsured (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.12-1.65) and Medicaid-insured individuals (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.03-1.44) in comparison with the privately insured. Uninsured patients had lower odds of treatment at a high-volume facility, and Medicaid-insured patients had lower odds of receiving NAC (P<.001 for both). Compared with privately insured individuals, uninsured and Medicaid-insured individuals experience worse prognoses and poorer care quality. Expanding high-quality insurance coverage to marginalized populations may help to reduce the burden of this disease.

Variation in the Delivery of Inpatient Orthopaedic Care to Medicaid Beneficiaries within a Single Metropolitan Region.

There is variability in access to and utilization of orthopaedic care, particularly for those with Medicaid insurance. One potential contributor is perceived unwillingness of surgeons and hospitals to accept underinsured patients. We used administrative data to examine the payer mix for select inpatient orthopaedic surgical procedures at all hospitals within a single region, hypothesizing that the delivery of orthopaedic surgery to Medicaid beneficiaries varies highly at the hospital level. Using administrative data, we analyzed inpatient hospitalizations for elective cases (total knee or hip arthroplasty; spinal decompression or fusion) and trauma cases (hip hemiarthroplasty; femoral or tibial and fibular fracture repair) among 22 hospitals in a single region from 2011 to 2016 for patients who were 18 to 64 years of age. The primary outcome was the percentage of each hospital's caseload with Medicaid listed as the primary payer. The secondary outcome measured each hospital's Medicaid percentage against the percentage of Medicaid-insured individuals within 10 miles of the hospital (Medicaid share ratio), using a ratio of 1 as a benchmark. To quantify variation, we calculated a weighted coefficient of variation of the Medicaid share ratio for all cases combined, elective cases only, and trauma cases only. For all cases (n = 19,204), the mean percentage of Medicaid-funded surgical procedures was 7.6% (range, 0.2% to 57.3%). The mean Medicaid share ratio was 1.0 (range, 0.05 to 4.20). Across 22 hospitals, the weighted coefficient of variation for Medicaid share was 69, indicating very high variation. For elective cases alone, the mean percentage of Medicaid-funded surgical procedures was 5.5% (range, 0.2% to 64.6%). The mean Medicaid share ratio was 0.71 (range, 0.05 to 4.73), and the weighted coefficient of variation was 93. For trauma cases alone, Medicaid-funded surgical procedures were 14.7% (range, 0.0% to 35.7%). The mean Medicaid share ratio was 2.0 (range, 0 to 3.93), and the weighted coefficient of variation was 34. Delivery of care was highly variable when benchmarking against the insurance composition of each hospital's surrounding community. Although generalizability to other regions is limited, our findings support previously asserted notions that delivery of orthopaedic care may differ on the basis of socioeconomic markers (such as insurance status). If not addressed, these inequities may exacerbate existing racially and socioeconomically based disparities in care.

Assessing Antiretroviral Use During Gaps in HIV Primary Care Using Multisite Medicaid Claims and Clinical Data.

Some individuals who appear poorly retained by clinic visit-based retention measures are using antiretroviral therapy (ART) and maintaining viral suppression. We examined whether individuals with a gap in HIV primary care (≥180 days between HIV outpatient clinic visits) obtained ART during that gap after 180 days. HIV Research Network data from 5 sites and Medicaid Analytic Extract eligibility and pharmacy data were combined. Factors associated with having both an HIV primary care gap and a new (ie, nonrefill) ART prescription during a gap were evaluated with multinomial logistic regression. Of 6892 HIV Research Network patients, 6196 (90%) were linked to Medicaid data, and 4275 had any Medicaid ART prescription. Over half (54%) had occasional gaps in HIV primary care. Women, older people, and those with suppressed viral load were less likely to have a gap. Among those with occasional gaps (n = 2282), 51% received a new ART prescription in a gap. Viral load suppression before gap was associated with receiving a new ART prescription in a gap (odds ratio = 1.91, 95% confidence interval: 1.57 to 2.32), as was number of days in a gap (odds ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.02 to 1.05), and the proportion of months in the gap enrolled in Medicaid. Medicaid-insured individuals commonly receive ART during gaps in HIV primary care, but almost half do not. Retention measures based on visit frequency data that do not incorporate receipt of ART and/or viral suppression may misclassify individuals who remain suppressed on ART as not retained.

Variation in mental illness and provision of public mental health services

By providing affordable healthcare to many Americans for the first time, the Affordable Care Act increases demand for public mental health services. It is, however, unclear if states’ provision standards for supply of mental health services will be able to accommodate this demand increase. Both the demand and supply of public mental health services vary within states; it is necessary to measure both locally. In this paper, we estimate the prevalence of mental illness within 30 geographical regions in the state of Virginia, a representative example of how many states organize their public mental health systems and how mental illness prevalence can be measured locally. Our methodology extends the analysis in Stern (Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methods 14:109–155, 2014) by covering an entire state and accounting for peoples’ insurance status. The latter allows us to compare estimates of demand for public mental health services among those 30 geographical regions. We find that over 66,000 uninsured and Medicaid-insured individuals in Virginia are not provided with public mental health services. The deficit varies locally, with several regions having no deficit and others having 5000 or more untreated people. We also estimate that a large portion of the unserved people with mental illness are uninsured but would be insured for mental health services through Medicaid if Virginia were to accept the Medicaid expansion associated with the Affordable Care Act. These results provide evidence that there is significant variation in the demand for and public health systems’ ability to supply mental health services within states. This implies states can better serve populations relying on mental health care by allocating scarce public mental health dollars to localities reflecting their need.

No Evidence of an Association Between Efavirenz Exposure and Suicidality Among HIV Patients Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy in a Retrospective Cohort Study of Real World Data.

Recently, published studies have reported conflicting results regarding the association between efavirenz exposure and the risk of suicidality among patients with human immunodeficiency virus. The objective of this analysis was to compare the rate of suicidality among patients initiating efavirenz-containing versus efavirenz-free antiretroviral (ARV) regimens.This retrospective cohort study used US administrative claims data for commercially and Medicaid-insured individuals for the years 2006 to 2013. ARV-naive patients aged ≥12 years initiating an efavirenz-containing or efavirenz-free ARV regimen with ≥6 months of continuous insurance enrollment prior to ARV initiation were selected. The primary outcome was suicidality, defined as the occurrence of any medical claim with a diagnosis code for suicidal ideation or an inpatient or emergency department medical claim for suicide attempt. Unadjusted incidence rates were calculated and propensity score-adjusted hazard ratios were estimated to account for differences in patient characteristics.There were 19,983 patients (efavirenz-containing, n = 11,187; efavirenz-free, n = 8796) in the commercial database and 5154 patients (efavirenz-containing, n = 2224; efavirenz-free, n = 2930) in the Medicaid database. Unadjusted incidence rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) of suicidality per 1000 person-years were: commercial, efavirenz-containing (3.3 [2.4-4.4]), efavirenz-free (4.0 [2.7-5.8]); Medicaid, efavirenz-containing (25.7 [18.8-34.4]), efavirenz-free (40.6 [31.9-50.9]). In propensity score-adjusted analyses, efavirenz use was not associated with suicidality: adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of suicidality compared with efavirenz-free regimen, commercial, 1.029 (0.636-1.665); Medicaid, 0.902 (0.617-1.319).This analysis found no conclusive evidence of an increased risk of suicidality among patients initiating an efavirenz-containing ARV regimen. However, channeling bias may exist even after adjusting for measured patient characteristics.

Screening Colonoscopy Among Colorectal Cancer Survivors Insured by Medicaid

The objectives of this research study are to describe the proportion of Medicaid-insured colorectal cancer survivors who had a colonoscopy between 3 and 18 months after surgery of the colon or rectum and to determine if patient, health services, and community characteristics are associated with colonoscopy follow-up after treatment. A retrospective cohort study among 1044 Medicaid-insured individuals diagnosed with local or regional colorectal cancer was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed patient, hospital, and community characteristics associated with colonoscopy. About 42% of the study population had a colonoscopy 3 to 18 months after surgery. Factors associated with receipt of colonoscopy in the multivariable model include having colon (vs rectal) cancer, having local (vs regional) cancer, and having received chemotherapy as part of first course of therapy. Being 75 or older (vs <65), having first course of therapy at a hospital with the highest surgical volume (vs lowest surgical volume), and living in an urban (vs rural) environment were associated with a decreased likelihood of colonoscopy. Colonoscopy utilization patterns diverge after 65 years of age when persons become dually insured by Medicare. By age 80 years, there seems to be an almost 3-fold difference in receipt of colonoscopy-those with comorbidity are more likely to be screened than those without comorbidity. Less than half of Medicaid-insured colorectal cancer survivors received a colonoscopy in 3 to 18 months after colorectal resection. Improvements in screening in this high-risk population should be the target of future interventions to reduce the probability of recurrence.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Among Medicaid-Enrolled Patients Diagnosed With Nonmetastatic Colon Cancer

It has been suggested that low-income populations may not receive adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer, although factors associated with its receipt have not been well-elucidated. This article describes the characteristics associated with chemotherapy among a Medicaid-insured population diagnosed with colon cancer. A retrospective cohort design among 692 Medicaid-insured individuals diagnosed with regional colon cancer was conducted. Logistic regression analyses assessed patient, hospital, and community characteristics associated with chemotherapy. Data were derived from the N.C. Central Cancer Registry, N.C. Medicaid Claims, the American Hospital Directory, and the US Census. Forty-two percent received chemotherapy. Persons <65 years of age, diagnosis and treatment at different facilities, and living in a community with a higher percentage of persons in poverty were associated with receipt of chemotherapy. Individuals <65 years at time of diagnosis and had a score of 1+ on the Charlson Comorbidity index were 16% less likely to receive chemotherapy as those less than 65 years of age with no comorbid conditions. Receipt of chemotherapy among those 65 to 74 and those 75 and older did not differ appreciably by comorbidity status. Patient age was important in predicting who received adjuvant care, although the impact of comorbidity on chemotherapy was more pronounced among those <65 years of age.

Association of Insurance Status and Ethnicity With Cancer Stage at Diagnosis for 12 Cancer Sites: A Retrospective Analysis

ABSTRACT Persons living in the United States who lack private medical insurance are less likely to have access to medical care and to take part in cancer screening programs. Regional studies suggest that uninsured and Medicaid-insured individuals are likelier than those who are privately insured to present with advanced-stage cancer, but this has not been confirmed using contemporary national-level information. Complicating the problem is the observation that cancer patients from ethnic minorities are likelier than non-Hispanic whites to be uninsured or Medicaid insured. This study sought relationships between insurance status and disease stage at the time of diagnosis for twelve cancer sites (breast, colorectal, kidney, lung, melanoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, ovary, pancreas, prostate, urinary bladder, uterus, thyroid). The study population included 3,742,407 patients whose characteristics resembled those of the U.S. population not included in the analysis. The patients, diagnosed in the years 1998–2004, were enrolled in the U.S. National Cancer Database, a hospital-based registry with patient information from approximately 1430 facilities. Uninsured and Medicaid-insured patients were significantly more likely than privately insured patients to present with advanced-stage (stage III or stage IV) cancer. The relationship was most evident for patients whose cancers can potentially be detected at an early stage by symptom assessment or screening. They include breast and colorectal cancers, lung cancer, and melanoma. Compared with privately insured patients, the odds ratios (ORs) for advanced-stage disease at diagnosis for uninsured and Medicaid-insured patients with colorectal cancer were 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.9–2.1) and 1.6 (1.5–1.7), respectively. For advanced-stage melanoma, the OR was 2.3 (2.1–2.5) for uninsured patients and 3.3 (3.0–3.6) for Medicaid-insured patients compared to privately insured patients. Compared with white patients, blacks and Hispanics had an increased risk of advanced-stage disease at diagnosis independently of insurance status. The investigators conclude that cancer patients residing in the United States who are uninsured or have Medicaid insurance are at a considerably increased risk of having more advanced disease when diagnosed than are privately insured patients.

Association of insurance status and ethnicity with cancer stage at diagnosis for 12 cancer sites: a retrospective analysis

Individuals in the USA without private medical insurance are less likely to have access to medical care or participate in cancer screening programmes than those with private medical insurance. Smaller regional studies in the USA suggest that uninsured and Medicaid-insured individuals are more likely to present with advanced-stage cancer than privately insured patients; however, this finding has not been assessed using contemporary, national-level data. Furthermore, patients with cancer from ethnic minorities are more likely to be uninsured or Medicaid-insured than non-Hispanic white people. Separating the effects on stage of cancer at diagnosis associated with these two types of patient characteristics can be difficult. Patients with cancer in the USA, diagnosed between 1998 and 2004, were identified using the US National Cancer Database-a hospital-based registry that contains patient information from about 1430 facilities. Odds ratios and 95% CIs for the effect of insurance status (Medicaid, Medicare (65-99 years), Medicare (18-64 years), private, or uninsured) and ethnicity (white, Hispanic, black, or other) on disease stage at diagnosis for 12 cancer sites (breast [female], colorectal, kidney, lung, melanoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, ovary, pancreas, prostate, urinary bladder, uterus, and thyroid) were estimated, while controlling for patient characteristics. 3,742,407 patients were included in the analysis; patient characteristics were similar to those of the corresponding US population not included in the analysis. Uninsured and Medicaid-insured patients were significantly more likely to present with advanced-stage cancer compared with privately insured patients. This finding was most prominent for patients who had cancers that can potentially be detected early by screening or symptom assessment (eg, breast, colorectal, and lung cancer, as well as melanoma). For example, the odds ratios for advanced-stage disease (stage III or IV) at diagnosis for uninsured or Medicaid-insured patients with colorectal cancer were 2.0 (95% CI 1.9-2.1) and 1.6 (95% CI 1.5-1.7), respectively, compared with privately-insured patients. For advanced-stage melanoma, the odds ratios were 2.3 (2.1-2.5) for uninsured patients and 3.3 (3.0-3.6) for Medicaid-insured patients compared with privately insured patients. Black and Hispanic patients were noted to have an increased risk of advanced-stage disease (stage III or IV) at diagnosis, irrespective of insurance status, compared with White patients. In this US-based analysis, uninsured and Medicaid-insured patients, and those from ethnic minorities, had substantially increased risks of presenting with advanced-stage cancers at diagnosis. Although many factors other than insurance status also affect the quality of care received, adequate insurance is a crucial factor for receiving appropriate cancer screening and timely access to medical care.

Leukotriene antagonists and Churg-Strauss syndrome: the smoking gun.

<h3>Background</h3> Chronically ill adults insured by Medicaid experience health inequities following hospitalisation. <h3>Local problem</h3> Postacute outcomes, including rates of 30-day readmissions and postacute emergency department (ED), were higher among Medicaid-insured individuals compared with commercially insured individuals and social needs were inconsistently addressed. <h3>Methods</h3> An interdisciplinary team introduced a clinical pathway called ‘THRIVE’ to provide postacute wrap-around services for individuals insured by Medicaid. <h3>Intervention</h3> Enrolment into the THRIVE clinical pathway occurred during hospitalisation and multidisciplinary services were deployed into homes within 48 hours of discharge to address clinical and social needs. <h3>Results</h3> Compared with those not enrolled in THRIVE (n=437), individuals who participated in the THRIVE clinical pathway (n=42) experienced fewer readmissions (14.3% vs 28.4%) and ED visits (14.3% vs 28.8 %). <h3>Conclusion</h3> THRIVE is a promising clinical pathway that increases access to ambulatory care after discharge and may reduce readmissions and ED visits.