Median Time-to-treatment Failure Research Articles

Real-World Data Analysis of CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy-A Patient-Centric Single Center Study.

The quest to comprehend the real-world efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKis) in breast cancer continues, as patient responses vary significantly. This single-center retrospective study evaluated CDKi use outside the trial condition from November 2016 to May 2020. Progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), short-term and prolonged treatment benefit (≥4 and ≥10 months), as well as prognostic and predictive markers were assessed with Kaplan-Meier and multivariate regression analyses. Out of 86 identified patients, 58 (67.4%) had treatment failure of which 40 (46.5%) were due to progression. Median PFS and TTF were 12 and 8.5 months, respectively. A total of 57 (66.3%) and 42 (48.8%) patients experienced short-term and prolonged treatment benefit. Independent, significant predictors for PFS were progesterone receptor expression (HR: 0.88), multiple metastatic sites (HR: 2.56), and hepatic metastasis (HR: 2.01). Significant predictors for TTF were PR expression (HR: 0.86), multiple sites (HR: 3.29), adverse events (HR: 2.35), and diabetes (HR: 2.88). Aside from tumor biology and adverse events, treatment modifications like pausing and switching of CDKi were predictive for short-term (OR: 6.73) and prolonged (OR: 14.27) therapeutic benefit, respectively. These findings emphasize the importance of tailored treatment strategies, highlighting the role of PR expression, metastatic burden, and therapeutic adjustments in optimizing patient outcomes in real-world breast cancer management.

A real-world multicentre evaluation of atezolizumab plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in Italy.

The aim of this study was to analyze real-life data from a cohort of adult patients receiving atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin and etoposide for first-line treatment of ES-SCLC, in order to assess relative dose intensity (RDI), time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) of treatments as well as the correlation between these outcomes. An observational retrospective study was conducted. All patients treated with atezolizumab combined with carboplatin and etoposide for first-line treatment of ES-SCLC were included. Median TTD, TTF, PFS and OS were calculated in our cohort of patient by the Kaplan Meier method. The curves obtained with the Kaplan Meier method of TTF and TTD are substantially similar, indicating a good concordance of the information extracted by the two different data sources. This tendency was confirmed also when the TTD versus PFS curves were compared. The median OS registered was 11.8 months. Patients with no liver metastases showed a longer median time of OS than patients with liver metastases. The mean value of RDI for the entire cohort was 87.4%. Our study showed that TTD, calculated from the administration data is a useful proxy of TTF as registered in the clinical chart. TTD is a real-world outcome that can be used to demonstrate the efficacy of drugs used for administered therapies. It can be used as an end point for RWE studies, where the evaluation is less structured and standardized.

Effect of cancer cachexia on first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a claims database study in Japan

BackgroundCancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome leading to progressive functional impairment. How cachexia affects the treatment course of chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer has not been well understood.MethodsThis is an exploratory, retrospective, observational cohort study using the Japanese medical claims database from Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. The study population included patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in whom first-line FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) was initiated between October 1, 2018, and September 30, 2020. In this study, we defined patients with cancer cachexia as those who had a weight loss of ≥ 5% in the preceding 6 months. The primary outcome was time-to-treatment failure (TTF). The observation period was six months from the initiation of first-line FFX or GnP treatment.ResultsA total of 1897 patients (421 patients into the cachexia group; 1476 patients into the non-cachexia group) were analyzed in this study. The median TTF was 121 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 94–146) in the cachexia group and 143 days (95% CI 134–152) in the non-cachexia group. The hazard ratio for TTF of the cachexia versus non-cachexia group was 1.136 (95% CI 0.979–1.319). The median number of doses was two doses fewer in the cachexia group than in the non-cachexia group for both FFX and GnP.ConclusionCancer cachexia was suggested to be associated with shorter TTF and a reduced number of doses in patients with pancreatic cancer who received first-line FFX or GnP treatment.Clinical Trial Registration clinicaltrials.jp: UMIN000045820.

A real-world cohort study of first-line afatinib in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Vietnam

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of first-line afatinib treatment in a real-world setting in Vietnam.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted across nine hospitals in Vietnam. Advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received afatinib as first-line therapy between April 2018 and June 2022 were included, and patient medical records were reviewed. Key outcomes were overall response rate (ORR), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and tolerability.ResultsA total of 343 patients on first-line afatinib were eligible for the study. EGFR exon 19 deletion (Del19) alone was detected in 46.9% of patients, L858R mutation alone in 26.3%, and other uncommon EGFR mutations, including compound mutations, in 26.8%. Patients with brain metastases at baseline were 25.4%. Patients who received 40 mg, 30 mg, and 20 mg as starting doses of afatinib were 58.6%, 39.9%, and 1.5%, respectively. The ORR was 78.1% in the overall population, 82.6% in the Del19 mutation subgroup, 73.3% in the L858R mutation subgroup, and 75.0% in the uncommon mutation subgroup (p > 0.05). The univariate and multivariate analyses indicate that the ORR increased when the starting dose was 40 mg compared to starting doses below 40 mg (83.9% vs. 74.3%, p = 0.034). The median TTF (mTTF) was 16.7 months (CI 95%: 14.8–18.5) in all patients, with a median follow-up time of 26.2 months. The mTTF was longer in patients in the common EGFR mutation subgroup (Del19/L858R) than in those in the uncommon mutation subgroup (17.5 vs. 13.8 months, p = 0.045) and in those without versus with brain metastases at baseline (17.5 vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.049). There were no significant differences in the mTTF between subgroups based on the starting dose of 40 mg and < 40 mg (16.7 vs. 16.9 months, p > 0.05). The most common treatment-related adverse events (any grade/grade ≥ 3) were diarrhea (55.4%/3.5%), rash (51.9%/3.2%), paronychia (35.3%/5.0%), and stomatitis (22.2%/1.2%).ConclusionsAfatinib demonstrated clinical effectiveness and good tolerability in Vietnamese EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. In our real-world setting, administering a starting dose below 40 mg might result in a reduction in ORR; however, it might not have a significant impact on TTF.

Real-world analysis of afatinib as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer with uncommon EGFR mutations: a multicenter study in Vietnam.

Afatinib is indicated for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and uncommon mutations. However, real-world studies on this topic are limited. This study aimed to evaluate afatinib as first-line therapy for locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations. A retrospective study included 92 patients with advanced NSCLC with uncommon and compound EGFR mutations, treated with afatinib as first-line therapy. Patients were followed up and evaluated every 3 months or when symptoms of progressive disease arose. The endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events. The G719X EGFR mutation had the highest occurrence rate (53.3% for both monotherapy and the compound). By contrast, the compound mutation G719X-S768I was observed at a rate of 22.8%. The ORR was 75%, with 15.2% of patients achieving complete response. The overall median TTF was 13.8 months. Patients with the G719X EGFR mutation (single and compound) had a median TTF of 19.3 months, longer than that of patients with other mutations, who had a median TTF of 11.2 months. Patients with compound EGFR mutations (G719X and S768I) demonstrated a median TTF of 23.2 months compared to that of 12.3 months for other mutations. Tolerated doses of 20 or 30 mg achieved a longer median TTF of 17.1 months compared to 11.2 months with 40 mg. Median TTF differed between patients with and without brain metastasis, at 11.2 and 16.9 months, respectively. Rash (55.4%) and diarrhea (53.3%) were the most common adverse events, primarily grades 1 and 2. Other side effects occurred at a low rate. Afatinib is effective for locally advanced metastatic NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations. Patients with G719X, compound G719X-S768I mutations, and tolerated doses of 20 or 30 mg had a longer median TTF than those with other mutations.

Durvalumab-Associated Pneumonitis in Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Population Study.

The PACIFIC trial led to a new standard of care for patients with locally advanced lung cancer, but real-world practice has demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pneumonitis can lead to significant clinical complications. This study aimed to examine the clinical predictors, outcomes, and healthcare utilization data in patients who received consolidation durvalumab. Using the Alberta Immunotherapy Database, NSCLC patients who received durvalumab in Alberta, Canada, from January 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. We examined incidence and predictive values of severe pneumonitis, with overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) using exploratory multivariate analyses. Of 189 patients, 91% were ECOG 0-1 and 85% had a partial response from chemoradiation prior to durvalumab. Median TTF and OS were not reached; 1-year OS was 82%. An amount of 26% developed any grade of pneumonitis; 9% had ≥grade 3 pneumonitis. Male gender and a pre-existing autoimmune condition were associated with severe pneumonitis. V20 was associated with any grade of pneumonitis. Pneumonitis development was found to be an independent risk factor for worse OS (p = 0.038) and TTF (p = 0.007). Our results suggest clinical and dosimetric predictive factors of durvalumab-associated pneumonitis. These results affirm the importance of careful patient selection for safe completion of consolidation durvalumab in real-world LA-NSCLC population.

Brief Report: Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Versus Plasma Next-Generation Sequencing in Detecting Clearance of Plasma EGFR Mutations and Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels as a Surrogate Measure

IntroductionTo compare the performance of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) in detecting clearance of plasma EGFR (pEGFR) mutations. MethodsPatients with treatment-naive advanced EGFR-mutated lung cancer treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were included. pEGFR were measured at baseline and first response assessment using ddPCR and NGS. Clearance of pEGFR was defined as undetectable levels after a positive baseline result. Results were correlated with time-to-treatment failure (TTF). In exploratory analysis, corresponding change in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels was evaluated. ResultsBetween January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, 27 patients were recruited. Ex19del comprised 74% (20 of 27) and L858R 26% (seven of 27). Osimertinib was used in 59% (16 of 27), dacomitinib 4% (one of 27), and gefitinib/erlotinib 37% (10 of 27). Sensitivity of ddPCR and NGS in detecting pEGFR mutation at baseline was 70% (19 of 27) and 78% (21 of 27), respectively (p = 0.16). All patients with detectable pEGFR by ddPCR were detected by NGS.At a median of 8 (range 3–24) weeks post-TKI initiation, clearance of pEGFR was achieved in 68% (13 of 19) and 71% (15 of 21) using ddPCR and NGS, respectively. Concordance between ddPCR and NGS was 79% (kappa = 0.513, p = 0.013). Clearance of pEGFR was associated with longer median TTF (not reached versus 6 months, p = 0.03) and median decrease in CEA levels by 70% from baseline.In another cohort of 124 patients, decrease in CEA levels by greater than 70% within 90 days of TKI initiation was associated with doubling of both TTF and overall survival. ConclusionsPlasma NGS trended toward higher sensitivity than ddPCR in detecting pEGFR, although both had similar concordance in detecting pEGFR clearance. Our results support using NGS at diagnosis and interchangeability of NGS and ddPCR for monitoring, whereas CEA could be explored as a surrogate for pEGFR clearance.

Incidence, outcomes, and risk factors of acute immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pneumonitis post-chemoradiation with durvalumab for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC): A population-based multicenter study.

8561 Background: The PACIFIC trial has drastically changed the LA-NSCLC treatment paradigm and improved survival outcomes with consolidation durvalumab post-chemoradiotherapy. Despite these promising results, real-world practice has demonstrated that ICI pneumonitis can have significant clinical complications and terminate consolidation therapy prematurely. This study aimed to identify clinical predictors, outcomes, and healthcare utilization in ICI pneumonitis in LA-NSCLC patients who received consolidation durvalumab in real-world practice. Methods: Using the Alberta Immunotherapy Database, we retrospectively evaluated all NSCLC patients who received durvalumab in Alberta, Canada from January 2018 to December 2021. Pneumonitis cases were identified based on radiographic changes and oncologists’ clinical assessments. We examined incidence and predictive values of severe pneumonitis (≥grade 3), with secondary outcomes of overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure (TTF). Exploratory multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictive values to developing severe pneumonitis and worse OS/TTF. Results: Of 189 total patients, most were ECOG 0-1 (91%) and had partial response from chemoradiation (85%) prior to durvalumab. 49% received full year of therapy (n = 93). Median TTF was 11.2 months, and median OS of 19.7 months with 1-year OS 64% (n = 121). 26% (n = 49) developed any grade of pneumonitis. 9% (n = 17) had severe pneumonitis. Corticosteroids were administered to 86% of the pneumonitis patients (n = 42); 53% (n = 26) required admission. 13% (n = 9) of deaths were attributed to pneumonitis. Male gender and pre-existing autoimmune condition were associated with severe pneumonitis whereas V20 (percentage of irradiated lung volume ≥20Gy) was associated with developing any grade pneumonitis. In multivariable analysis, male gender and V20 was significantly associated with worse OS whereas older age, smoking status, pneumonitis, and male gender with lower TTF. Pneumonitis development was found to be an independent risk factor for worse OS (p = 0.038) and TTF (p = 0.007). Conclusions: We report a pneumonitis incidence comparable to prior retrospective studies and higher rate of severe pneumonitis compared to PACIFIC trial. Our results corroborate that V20, a previously established risk factor for durvalumab associated pneumonitis, is a significant predictor for developing pneumonitis and worse OS. In contrast to smaller retrospective studies, we observed male gender and pre-existing autoimmune conditions appear to predict severe durvalumab associated ICI pneumonitis. These results affirm the importance of careful patient selection for safe completion of consolidation durvalumab in real-world LA-NSCLC population.

First-line systemic treatment with palbociclib in women aged ≥70 years presenting with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: Results from the PALOMAGE program.

1018 Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) combined with a CDK4/6 inhibitor is standard of care for hormone receptors-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (ABC). In France, 33% of BC are diagnosed in women aged 70 and older, contrasting with their constant underrepresentation in clinical trials. PALOMAGE, a prospective, observational, longitudinal real-life program, assessed the feasibility of ET combined with palbociclib (PAL), specifically in women aged ≥70 years with HR+ HER2- ABC. Methods: Depending on prior treatment for ABC and time of relapse, women were enrolled in two cohorts: ET-sensitive disease (no prior systemic treatment for ABC and no relapse within 1 year after adjuvant ET, cohort A) or ET-resistant disease (relapse on adjuvant ET or &lt; 1 year after completion, or prior treatment for ABC, cohort B). Data collected at baseline and then every 3 months included: sociodemographic, clinical, biological, disease- and treatment-related, response, quality of life (QoL; EORTC QLQ-C30 and ELD14), geriatric (G8 and Geriatric-COre DatasEt [G-CODE]) and safety. Results of feasibility in cohort B (rate of PAL discontinuation at 6 months 28.8%) were reported at SABCS 2021. Here, we report results in cohort A, based on the rate of PAL discontinuation at 18 months for any reason as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included time-to-treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), QoL, and safety. Results: For this analysis, 362 patients (from 130 sites) with sufficient data were considered: median age was 78 years (range: 70-94), ECOG was ≥2 in 19.2%, and visceral metastases was present in 39.8%. PAL starting dose was 125 mg, 100 mg, and 75 mg in 80.0%, 14.4%, and 5.6% of patients, respectively, and combined with an aromatase inhibitor in 93.6% or fulvestrant in 6.4%. Baseline scores showed G8 ≤14, ADL ≤5 and IADL ≤3 in 68.2%, 15.5% and 29.4% of patients, respectively. Among the 362 patients, 327 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. With a median follow-up of 20.7 months (95% CI: 18.8-22.0), the 18-month discontinuation rate for PAL was 41.9% (95% CI: 36.6%-47.2%), due to disease progression (20.8%), toxicity (7.7%), patient’s choice (6.7%), death (4.6%), or other reason (2.1%). Median TTF and PFS were 22.7 months (95% CI: 19.1–26.0) and 28.1 months (95% CI: 25.6-not reached), respectively. Safety profile showed (360 patients evaluable) 54.4% all grade neutropenia (1.1% febrile neutropenia). Impact of geriatric status on effectiveness and safety will be presented, together with the evolution of QoL. Conclusions: In a large real-life population of older women with G8 impaired in two thirds and with ET-sensitive ABC, discontinuation rate of PAL at 18 months was 41.9%, with a median PFS of 28.1 months, consistent with PALOMA2 results. Optimized ET combined with PAL is feasible in unselected older women with HR+ ET-sensitive ABC.

Phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of capeOX in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer using geriatric assessment (TCOG GI-1601).

348 Background: CapeOX is a standard regimen for treating advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, limited data are available for its use in the elderly patients. Geriatric assessment (GA) assessment is also considered important other than the age. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CapeOX as a first-line therapy for AGC in elderly patients. We performed GA assessments using the G8, and the MINI-COG. Methods: The inclusion criteria were: HER2-negative or unknown status, age 70 years or older, PS 0 or 1, no history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and an evaluable lesion based on the RECIST v1.1 guidelines. The initial treatment plan consisted of capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2, b.i.d., on days 1–14), and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, on day 1) every three weeks. After the initial feasibility assessment, the treatment plan was modified and consisted of capecitabine (750 mg/m2, b.i.d., on days 1–14) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2, on day 1) every three weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). G8 assessments were performed before the beginning of the treatment, every three months after the start of the treatment, and at the end of the treatment. MINI-COG assessments were performed before the beginning of the treatment, and at the end of the treatment. Results: Between November 2016 and June 2020, 108 patients were enrolled, out of which 104 were evaluated. Thirty-nine patients received the initial treatment whereas sixty-five patients received the modified treatment. The primary endpoint was met. The median OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) were 12.9 (95% CI: 11.7–14.8), 5.8 (95% CI: 5.1–7.1), and 4.3 (95% CI: 3.9–5.7) months, respectively, for all patients. The median OS, PFS, and TTF for the initial treatment plan were 13.4 (95% CI: 9.6–16.0), 5.8 (95% CI: 4.1–7.9), and 5.3 (95% CI: 3.5–7.3) months, respectively, and for the modified treatment plan were 12.8 (95% CI: 11.3–15.3), 5.7 (95% CI: 4.4–7.0), and 4.2 (95% CI: 3.7–5.7) months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities in the initial treatment plan patients were neutropenia (17.9%), anemia (12.8%), thrombocytopenia (12.8%), anorexia (10.3%), and nausea (10.3%) and in the modified treatment plan patients were (13.8%) and anorexia (12.3%). Mean G8 score was 11.4 before the treatment, 13.4 during the treatment and 11.6 at the end of the treatment. Mean MINI-COG score was 4.0 before the treatment, and 4.1 at the end of the treatment and the positive screen for dementia was 13.5% before the treatment and 11.4% at the end of the treatment. Conclusions: Our results show that the modified treatment plan is favorable for the elderly patients with gastric cancer based on the OS and the toxicities. Clinical trial information: 000022450 .

Serum Albumin Affects the Time-to-treatment Failure of Alectinib: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Alectinib is recommended for anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion gene-positive non-small cell lung cancer. We have experienced early alectinib discontinuation due to disease progression and adverse effects in real world. Because alectinib has a high protein-binding rate of >99%, low serum albumin may increase the concentration of free drug and affect efficacy and adverse events. However, no association between serum albumin and the clinical impact of alectinib has been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of serum albumin on time-to-treatment failure (TTF) in alectinib. Fifty-six patients who were admitted to four hospitals (National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo Minami-Sanjo Hospital, KKR Sapporo Medical Center, Otaru General Hospital) between October 2014 and September 2020 were retrospectively evaluated to identify those treated with alectinib. The multivariate analysis showed that the risk of discontinuation was significantly higher with serum albumin <3.6 g/dl compared to ≥3.6 g/dl at the start of alectinib administration (hazard ratio=3.00; 95% confidence interval=1.36-6.66; p<0.01). On Kaplan-Meier curves, TTF for serum albumin <3.6 was significantly shorter than that for ≥3.6. (median TTF: 12.1 months vs. not reach, p<0.01). To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report that serum albumin <3.6 g/dl at alectinib induction is associated with poor TTF. Low serum albumin is a poor prognostic factor in cancer patients. Thus, serum albumin levels must be measured before treatment.

A Population-Based Study on Survival of Higher Risks Myelofibrosis Patients Treated with Ruxolitinib in the Italian Lombardy Region

Introduction Myelofibrosis (MF) is a severe disease, and patients in the higher prognostic risk categories have a median overall survival (OS) between two and four years after diagnosis. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is the first approved drug for MF, with efficacy in terms of reduction of spleen and symptoms. An improvement of OS with RUX has been reported in different studies, such as a post-hoc analysis of the registration trials (Verstovsek et al, 2017) and in the real-world setting (Guglielmelli et al, 2022). In Italy, RUX is available since October 2014 for intermediate-2 (INT-2) and high risk (HR) and since January 2018 for intermediate-1 MF cases. High-cost drugs are delivered and monitored by each regional health authority. In this study, we analyzed the outcome of INT-2 and HR MF patients treated with RUX in Lombardy, a region of roughly 10 million individuals. Methods This is a population-based retrospective cohort study based on healthcare utilization databases of Lombardy region, including data on hospital admissions, drug prescriptions, outpatient's health services and demographics. The study cohort included all beneficiaries of the Regional Health Service who started RUX between October 2014 and December 2017 (to include only INT-2 and HR MF patients) and followed-up until 31st July 2021 (minimum observation period of the study: 3.5 years). The primary outcome of the study was OS, defined as the time between RUX start and death for any cause or censoring due to migration or to end of data availability. The secondary outcome was time-to-treatment failure (TTF), defined as the time between RUX start and interruption for any reason, including allogenic stem cells transplant (allo-SCT) or death, or censoring. OS and TTF were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and secondary malignancies (included blast phase, BP, or post MF-myelodysplastic syndromes, MDS) that required hospital admission and occurring during follow-up was assessed and expressed as incidence rate (IR) x100 person-years (p-y). Infections, bleedings, and major thrombotic events were considered if they occurred within 90 days from the last RUX prescription and before evolution into BP/MDS. Results During study period, 315 MF patients started RUX. Median age at first administration was 70 years (range, 24-92) and 57% were females. Within the three months preceding RUX start (from now on, referred to as "baseline"), 76 (24%) subjects received at least one red blood cells (RBC) transfusion unit and, among those, 18 (24%) could be classified as RBC transfusion-dependent (TD- Gale et al, 2011). RUX initial dose was <20 mg bid in 216 (69%) subjects and, within this subgroup, 93 (43%) started with only 5 mg bid. As for the 284 (90%) patients with at least six months of RUX exposure, modification of RBC transfusions needs compared to baseline is reported in Table 1. Median study follow-up was 40.5 months (range, 1-82). Overall, 173 (55%) deaths were observed. Median OS was 46.3 months (95%CI: 41.6-56.0), as reported in Figure 1. Treatment failure was observed in 144 (46%) patients, and the median TTF was 25.3 months (95%CI: 19.6-33.9). Among those subjects, median treatment duration was 12 months (range, 0.9-75.5). Allo-SCT was performed in 36 (11.4%) subjects at a median time of 8.7 months (range, 1.4-66.7) after RUX start. The most frequent AEs were infections (IR: 13.5 x100 p-y), bleeding events (4.2 x100 p-y) and thrombosis (1.8 x100 p-y). Secondary solid tumours had an IR of 4.5 x100 p-y, while the latter was 1.2 x100 p-y for lymphoproliferative disorders. Evolution into BP/MDS was reported in 58 (18%) of the cohort, with an IR of 5.8 x100 p-y. Conclusions This study provided a real-world description of RUX treatment outcomes in an unselected population-based cohort of patients with higher risks MF, reflecting the daily clinical practice in Lombardy, the most populated Italian region. In this cohort of 315 long observed INT-2 and HR MF patients, RUX demonstrated to have a robust effect on survival. Among patients without baseline transfusions needs, 21% started receiving RBC units during the first six months of exposure to RUX. In the same period, 77% of subjects that transfused at baseline continued receiving RBC units. MF progression rate into BP/MDS after RUX start was comparable to data of the pre-RUX era, confirming this still remains an unmet clinical need in the field. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Impact of First-Line FOLFIRINOX-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy on the Efficacy of Second-Line GnP in Patients with Unresectable Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) and Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) are effective first-line chemotherapies for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (APC); however, both lead to peripheral neuropathy (PN). Aims: To evaluate the impact of first-line mFFX-induced PN on the efficacy of second-line GnP in patients with APC. Methods: A database containing patients with APC was retrospectively analyzed to evaluate patients who received second-line GnP after first-line mFFX failure between September 2014 and January 2021. The efficacy and safety of GnP were compared between patients with PN ≥ Grade 2 (PN group) and PN ≤ Grade 1 (non-PN group) at the start of second-line GnP. Cox proportional hazards analysis was also performed to examine the effect on overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure (TTF). Results: Fifty-nine patients (PN group, 18 patients; non-PN group, 41 patients) were included. Median OS and TTF in the PN versus non-PN group were 7.7 versus 5.7 months (p = 0.19) and 3.8 versus 2.7 months (p = 0.18), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that PN (≥Grade 2) was not a significant factor affecting either OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33–1.31, p = 0.24) or TTF (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.38–1.33, p = 0.28). No significant difference was observed in the relative dose intensity of GEM or nab-PTX, and incidence of adverse events. Conclusions: mFFX-induced PN has little impact on the efficacy and safety of second-line GnP in patients with APC. Second-line GnP could be a possible treatment option regardless of the presence of PN.

AML-085 Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Romanian Patients With AML Unfit for First-Line Intensive Chemotherapy

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) predominantly affects the elderly, and prognosis declines with age. Induction chemotherapy plus consolidation therapy is the standard of care for fit patients; options for unfit patients include hypomethylating agents (HMA), low dose cytarabine (LDAC), targeted therapies, and best supportive care (BSC). This retrospective chart review evaluated clinical outcomes in unfit Romanian patients with AML who initiated first-line treatment or BSC 01/01/2015-12/31/2018. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and response rates were assessed. Of 98 patients, 84 (85.7%) received systemic therapies: HMA, LDAC, and other therapies; 14 (14.3%) received BSC. Median OS at the time of data collection was 8.6 months, significantly lower in the BSC group (3.4 months) than in those who received an HMA as a first line systemic therapy (FLST) (10.0 months). The most frequent cause of death was AML progression, infection, and other comorbid conditions in the FLST group and AML progression in the BSC group. Median PFS was 6.0 months, significantly longer in those who received an HMA as FLST than in those who received other types of therapies (8.0 months in those who received HMA vs. 6.4 months in LDCA vs. 3.4 in the BSC group). Median TTF was significantly longer in the BSC group (3.6 months) as compared to the systemic therapy group (2.1 months in those who received HMAs, 0.4 months in those who received LDCA, and 1.0 months in those who received other systemic therapies). The best overall response in the FLST group was stable disease in 20.2% of the patients, partial remission (PR), and progressive disease (PD) in 9.5% of the patients, and complete remission (CR) in 8.3% of the patients, with a median time from the start of treatment to the best response of 110.5 days. Our findings highlight the unmet need for novel therapies for unfit patients.

Sequential Afatinib and Osimertinib in Asian Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Acquired T790M: Combined Analysis of Two Global Non-Interventional Studies.

ObjectiveTwo recent non-interventional trials, GioTag and UpSwinG, demonstrated encouraging time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Del19 or L858R) who received sequential afatinib/osimertinib, especially in Asians. Here, we have undertaken a combined analysis of Asian patients from both studies.Materials and MethodsExisting medical/electronic records were identified for consecutive EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naïve patients who received first-line afatinib/second-line osimertinib in “real-world” practice (all T790M-positive). Patients with active brain metastases were excluded. The primary objective was TTF. OS was a key secondary objective.ResultsOne hundred and sixty-eight patients were analyzed. Most patients were recruited from South Korea or Japan (52/21%). At the start of afatinib, median age (range) was 61.5 years (35–88), 58% were female, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (0/1/≥2) was 29/62/9%, 17% had brain metastases, and EGFR mutation status (Del19/L858R) was 65/35%. At the start of osimertinib, ECOG PS (0/1/≥2) was 22/61/17% and 14% had brain metastases. Median TTF and OS were 30.0 months (95% CI: 24.5–32.5) and 45.2 months (95% CI: 41.7–71.1), respectively. Median OS was 63.5 months in patients with a Del19 mutation. Median OS in patients with brain metastases or ECOG PS ≥2 was 26.4 and 33.1 months, respectively.ConclusionSequential afatinib/osimertinib showed encouraging activity in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and T790M-mediated acquired resistance, especially those with Del19-positive disease. Activity was observed across “real-world” patients including those with poor ECOG PS and/or brain metastases. ECOG PS and incidence of brain metastases remained stable prior to, and after, afatinib.

MO29-4 Sequential afatinib and osimertinib in Asians with EGFRm+ NSCLC: combined analysis of two non-interventional studies

Sequential use of afatinib and osimertinib could be an effective strategy in EGFRm+ NSCLC pts with T790M-mediated resistance to 1st-line treatment. Two recent non-interventional trials, GioTag and UpSwinG, demonstrated encouraging time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) in pts receiving sequential afatinib and osimertinib, especially in Asian pts (median TTF: 28.8-37.1 months; median OS: 42.3-44.8 months). Here, in order to increase cohort size and facilitate sub-group analysis, we have undertaken a combined analysis of Asian pts from GioTag and UpSwinG.

Survival analysis of the randomized phase II trial to investigate androgen signaling inhibitors with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for castration-sensitive prostate cancer: LACOG 0415.

5076 Background: LACOG 0415 is a phase II, open-label, clinical trial evaluating ADT-free alternatives for advanced castration sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC). Methods: Patients with locally advanced, high-risk biochemical recurrence or metastatic CSPC were randomized (1:1:1) to receive ADT with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (ADT+AAP), apalutamide alone (APA), or apalutamide with AAP (APA+AAP). The primary endpoint of the trial was the proportion of patients who achieved PSA≤0.2 ng/mL level at week 25. Patients without disease-progression and with clinical benefit after week 25 were allowed to maintain treatment at the discretion of physicians. Herein, we presented the outcomes of 2 year-overall survival (2y-OS) and time-to-treatment failure (TTF). The time-to-event endpoint was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by stratified log-rank test. Results: 128 patients were randomized to the ADT+AAP (n = 42), APA (n = 42), and APA+AAP (n = 44) arms. At week 25, PSA≤0.2 ng/mL was observed in 75.6% (95%CI 59.7%-87.6%), 60.0% (95%CI 43.3%-75.1%), and 79.5% (95%CI 63.5%-90.7%) of patients in the ADT+AAP, APA, and APA+AAP arms, respectively. 110 patients continued treatment after week 25. At the 2-year visit, 80 (62.5%) patients remained on the study medication. Median TTF was 24.0 months (95%CI 23.3 - 24.0) with ADT+AAP, 24.0 months (95%CI not estimated) with APA, and 24.0 months (95%CI 13.0-24.0) with APA+AAP. The main reasons for treatment discontinuation were disease progression (n = 8, 6.3%), toxicity (n = 10, 7.8%), death (n = 6, 4.7%), withdrawal (n = 4, 3.1%), and other (n = 19, 14.8%). The estimated proportion of patients who were alive at 2 years (2y-OS rate) was 92.5% (95%CI 84.3-100) with ADT+AAP, 87.9% (95%CI 77.9-97.8) with APA, and 92.7% (95%CI 84.8-100) with APA+AAP (p = 0.5926). 2y-OS was 92.9% (95% CI 85.3 - 96.2) in patients with PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL at week 25, while 2y-OS was 85.0% (95% CI 72.9-97.1) in patients with PSA &gt; 0.2 ng/mL at week 25 (p = 0.1250). Conclusions: Patients with advanced CSPC treated with ADT+AAP, APA, or APA+AAP had high rates of PSA response and favorable 2y-OS. PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL at week 25 seems to be a surrogate prognostic predictor of OS in advanced CSPC. In the overall sample, patients with PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL at week 25 had higher 2y-OS rate than those with PSA &gt; 0.2 ng/mL at week 25 (92.9% vs. 85.0%), however without statistical significance. Clinical trial information: NCT02867020.

Safety and effectiveness of eribulin in Japanese patients with soft tissue sarcoma including rare subtypes: a post-marketing observational study

BackgroundSoft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a heterogeneous group of cancers with over 100 described subtypes. While these cancers are infrequent, the prognosis is quite poor, particularly for those with stage IV metastatic disease. Patients for whom curative resection is difficult or those with recurrent metastatic disease are treated with chemotherapy, although the options are very limited. Eribulin is an approved treatment of all STS subtypes in Japan. Efficacy and safety data for the treatment of rare STS subtypes other than liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma (L-type sarcomas) are limited. This nationwide, multicenter, prospective, post-marketing observational study was conducted to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of eribulin in Japanese patients with STS.MethodsPatients with all types of STS and who consented to eribulin treatment were eligible to participate. The observation period was 1 year, starting at treatment initiation, and clinical outcomes were followed up for 2 years after initiating treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Additional outcomes included time-to-treatment failure (TTF), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. ORR and DCR were evaluated using imaging findings. Effectiveness results were analyzed both for all patients and by STS subtype.ResultsA total of 256 patients were enrolled; 252 and 254 were included in the effectiveness and safety analysis set, respectively. Most patients (83.1%) received an initial eribulin dose of 1.4 mg/m2 (standard dose). Respective median OS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 10.8 (8.5–13.1), 13.8 (10.1–22.3) and 6.5 (5.7–11.1) months for all, L-type, and non-L-type subtypes. The respective median TTF (95% CI) was 2.5 (2.1–2.8), 2.8 (2.3–3.7), and 2.2 (1.6–2.6) months. The ORR and DCR were 8.1 and 42.6%, respectively. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious ADRs were reported for 83.5 and 18.9% of patients, respectively. The main ADRs were associated with myelosuppression. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of ADRs for patients ≥65 versus <65 years old.ConclusionsEribulin demonstrated effectiveness and a manageable safety profile for patients with STS, although the effectiveness of eribulin was not demonstrated for some non-L-type subtypes.Trial registrationNCT03058406 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with AML unfit for first-line intensive chemotherapy*

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) predominantly affects the elderly, and prognosis declines with age. Induction chemotherapy plus consolidation therapy is standard of care for fit patients; options for unfit patients include hypomethylating agents (HMA), low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), targeted therapies, and best supportive care (BSC). This retrospective chart review evaluated clinical outcomes in unfit patients with AML who initiated first-line treatment or BSC 01/01/2015–12/31/2018. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and response rates were assessed. Of 1762 patients, 1310 received systemic therapies: 809 HMA, 199 LDAC, and 302 other therapies; 452 received BSC. Median OS was 9.9, 7.9, 5.4, and 2.5 months for HMA, LDAC, other, and BSC, respectively. Median PFS was 7.5, 5.3, 4.1, and 2.1 months for HMA, LDAC, other, and BSC, respectively; median TTF was 4.9, 2.1, 2.2, and 2.1 months, respectively. Our findings highlight the unmet need for novel therapies for unfit patients.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Activity in Patients with NSCLC Harboring Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Retrospective International Cohort Study (UpSwinG).

BackgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are standard of care for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with common mutations (Del19 or L858R); however, 7%-23% of NSCLC tumors harbor uncommon EGFR mutations. These mutations are highly heterogeneous, and developments in detection techniques are helping to identify mutations with little or no clinical data.Patients and MethodsIn this retrospective, global, multi-center study (NCT04179890), existing health records were identified for consecutive EGFR TKI-naïve patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (T790M, ex20ins, major uncommon [G719X, L861Q, or S768I], or “other” mutations; compound mutations) treated with erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, or osimertinib in first or second line. Endpoints included time-to-treatment failure (TTF), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS).ResultsOverall, 246 patients (median age: 69.5 years; Asian: 84%) were included from 9 countries. Most patients (92%) received an EGFR TKI as first-line therapy; 54%, 43% and 3% received afatinib, first-generation TKIs, and osimertinib, respectively. Median TTF and OS with EGFR TKIs were 9.9 and 24.4 months; ORR was 43%. In patients treated with first-line chemotherapy (n = 20), median TTF and ORR were 6.6 months and 41%. Outcomes were most favorable in patients with major uncommon or compound mutations. Overall, TTF was 11.3 months with afatinib and 8.8 months with first-generation EGFR TKIs across mutation categories. In most mutation categories, median OS was >2 years.ConclusionIn a real-world setting, EGFR TKIs were the preferred treatment option in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations; strongest outcomes were seen in patients with major uncommon and compound mutations.