Median PSA Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Phase II trial of multi-kinase inhibitor ESK981 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

ESK981 is a potent tyrosine kinase and PIKfyve lipid kinase inhibitor. This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of ESK981 as a single agent in patients with androgen receptor-positive (AR +) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Eligible patients had mCRPC with progression on AR-targeted agents and without prior chemotherapy treatment. Each patient received 160mg ESK981 once daily for 5days per week for 4weeks per cycle (except for an adverse event (AE) occurrence). The primary endpoints were a 50% reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA50), and safety. Secondary endpoints included the time and the duration of PSA response, PSA progression rates, PSA progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Exploratory investigations included whole exome sequencing in patients before treatment, and morphological evaluation of biopsy samples pre- and post-treatment. PSA was evaluated in 13 patients. Only one patient (7.7% two-sided 95% Wilson CI (0.4%, 33.3%)) experienced a reduction in their PSA levels by 50% or more. The most common grade 3 treatment-related AEs were cardiac disorders, diarrhea, hypertension, alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase elevations. No grade 4-5 events occurred. Median PFS was 1.8months, and median OS was 12.1months. Peripheral immune cells showed increased T cell activation and cytokine production in two patients who received 12-weeks of ESK981. Although relatively well tolerated, ESK981 alone showed no anti-tumor activity in patients with AR + mCRPC and its further evaluation as a single agent in AR + mCRPC is not warranted. (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03456804. Registration date: March 7, 2018).

Low-dose abiraterone plus Olaparib as a late-line treatment for mCRPC patients without BRCA1/2 mutations: a multicenter retrospective pilot study

Although overall survival data are still premature, the PROpel study found radiological progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of abiraterone and olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, for patients who have not been genetically tested or lack BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCAm), this combination therapy has been questioned as a first-line conventional treatment for mCRPC, mainly due to significant health economics and side effects. In our retrospective study, we found that treatment with low-dose abiraterone plus olaparib as a late-line treatment for mCRPC could lead to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and symptom PFS in selective cases even without BRCAm. The median PSA–PFS was 8 months (IQR: 6.5–11.5), with a median follow-up duration of 39.0 months (IQR: 27.5–64.5). Gene tests were conducted in all patients, identifying non-BRCA mutations through ctDNA testing (24%), tumor tissue testing (12%), or both (64%). Adverse events occurred in 72% of patients, with 16% experiencing Grade ≥ 3 events. Common adverse events included anemia (64%), decreased appetite (48%), and fatigue (25%). Our findings support low-dose abiraterone plus olaparib as a potential option for mCRPC patients without BRCAm, offering manageable safety and efficacy profiles.

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors Therapy.

We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treated with first-line androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) in real-world clinical practice in Japan. Between 2012 and 2023, a total of 127 consecutive patients with nmCRPC received ARSI treatment. Overall survival (OS), metastatic-free survival (MFS), and prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) from ARSI initiation were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier methodology. Clinical factors associated with OS in nmCRPC were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Among the patients, 72, 26, 12, and 17 received enzalutamide (ENZ), abiraterone (ABI), apalutamide (APA), and darolutamide (DARO) as first-line therapy. The median OS and MFS for all patients were 79.0 and 42.0 months, respectively. Median PSA-PFS was 27.0, 20.0, 10.0, and 14.0 months for patients treated with ENZ, ABI, APA, and DARO, respectively (p = 0.33). Multivariate analysis revealed that a baseline PSA level ≥ 3.67 ng/mL at ARSI initiation was significantly associated with poorer OS (p = 0.002). ARSI demonstrated favorable efficacy in nmCRPC patients. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes among different types of ARSI therapy for nmCRP. Elevated baseline PSA at ARSI initiation was significantly associated with poorer OS.

Survival by first-line therapy and prognostic group among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a heterogeneous disease with prognoses varying from months to years at time of castration-resistant diagnosis. Optimal first-line therapy for those with different prognoses is unknown. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of men in a national healthcare delivery system receiving first-line therapy for mCRPC (abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, or ketoconazole) from 2010 to 2017, with follow-up through 2019. Using commonly drawn prognostic labs at start of mCRPC therapy (hemoglobin, albumin, and alkaline phosphatase), we categorized men into favorable, intermediate, or poor prognostic groups depending on whether they had none, one to two, or all three laboratory values worse than designated laboratory cutoffs. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to examine prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression-free and overall survival (OS) according to prognostic group and first-line therapy, and multivariable cox regression to determine variables associated with survival outcomes. Among 4135 patients, median PSA progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.6-7.3), and median OS 18.8 months (95% CI 18.0-19.6), ranging from 5.7 months (95% CI 4.8-7.0) in the poor prognosis group to 31.3 months (95% CI 29.7-32.9) in the favorable group. OS was similar regardless of initial treatment received for favorable and intermediate groups, but worse for those in the poor prognostic group who received ketoconazole (adjusted hazard ratio 2.07, 95% CI 1.2-3.6). PSA PFS was worse for those who received ketoconazole compared to abiraterone across all prognostic groups (favorable HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.34-2.31; intermediate HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.41-2.25; poor HR 8.01, 95% CI 2.93-21.9). Commonly drawn labs at mCRPC treatment start may aid in predicting survival and response to therapies, potentially informing discussions with care teams. First-line treatment selection impacts disease progression for all men with mCRPC regardless of prognostic group, but impacted OS only for men with poor prognosis at treatment start.

Efficacy of Enzalutamide Rechallenge for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

There have been several reports on rechallenge with docetaxel, cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, or ethinylestradiol for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, the efficacy of enzalutamide rechallenge for mCRPC has not been evaluated. We retrospectively reviewed 63 consecutive patients who received enzalutamide for mCRPC at our institution between 2014 and 2022. Eight of these patients underwent rechallenge with enzalutamide after disease progression on prior enzalutamide and other therapy and were the focus of this study. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (PSA decrease >50%), PSA progression-free survival, treatment duration, overall survival (OS) after CRPC, and treatment-related adverse events were evaluated. PSA decline to enzalutamide rechallenge was observed in 6 patients (75%), of which 2 patients had a PSA response. The median treatment duration was 4 months (range 1-12) and median PSA progression-free survival was 3 months (range 1-7). Median OS after CRPC was 41 months. OS after CRPC was not increased in patients with a PSA response. No toxicities were worse than grade ≥3. Enzalutamide rechallenge achieved a PSA response in a quarter of our patients with mCRPC after disease progression on prior enzalutamide. However, no improvement of OS was identified in these patients.

RECIP 1.0 Predicts Progression-Free Survival After [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Response Evaluation Criteria in Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Imaging (RECIP) 1.0 is an evidence-based framework to evaluate therapeutic efficacy in metastatic prostate cancer using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT. This study aimed to evaluate the associations of interim PSMA PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 with short-term outcome after radiopharmaceutical treatment. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who underwent [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy at 3 academic centers and received PSMA PET/CT at baseline and at 12 wk. Pairs of PSMA PET/CT images were assessed by 5 readers for visual RECIP 1.0. The primary outcome was the association of RECIP with prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: In total, 124 of 287 screened patients met the inclusion criteria, with 0 (0%), 29 (23%), 54 (44%), and 41 (33%) of those 124 patients having complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease (PD) by visual RECIP 1.0, respectively. Patients with visual RECIP PD had a significantly shorter PSA-PFS than those with RECIP stable disease or with RECIP partial response (2.6 vs. 6.4 vs. 8.4 mo; P < 0.001). The median PSA-PFS among patients with RECIP PD versus those with non-RECIP PD was 2.6 versus 7.2 mo (hazard ratio, 13.0; 95% CI, 7.0-24.1; P < 0.001). Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 after 2 cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA is prognostic for PSA-PFS. PSMA PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 may be used in earlier stages of prostate cancer to evaluate drug efficacy and to predict progression-free survival.

Same-day post-therapy imaging with a new generation whole-body digital SPECT/CT in assessing treatment response to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (RLT) represents a significant advancement for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), demonstrating improvements in radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) with a low rate of associated side effects. Currently, most post-therapy SPECT/CT is conducted at 24h after infusion. This study examines the clinical utility of a next-generation multi-detector Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride (CZT) SPECT/CT system (StarGuide) in same-day post-infusion assessment and early treatment response to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. In this retrospective study, 68 men with progressive mCRPC treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 at our center from June 2022 to June 2023 were evaluated. Digital whole-body SPECT/CT imaging was performed after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617infusion (mean ± SD: 1.8 ± 0.6h, range 1.1-4.9h). Quantitative analysis of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 positive lesions was performed in patients who underwent at least 2 post-therapy SPECT/CT, using liver parenchyma uptake as reference. Metrics including [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 positive total tumor volume (Lu-TTV), SUVmax and SUVmean were calculated. These quantitative metrics on post-infusion SPECT/CT images after cycles 1, 2 and 3 were correlated with overall survival (OS), prostate specific antigen-progression free survival (PSA-PFS) as defined by prostate cancer working group 3 (PCWG3), and PSA decrease over 50% (PSA50) response rates. 56 patients (means age 76.2 ± 8.1 years, range: 60-93) who underwent at least 2 post-therapy SPECT/CT were included in the image analysis. The whole-body SPECT/CT scans (~ 12min per scan) were well tolerated, with 221 same-day scans performed (89%). At a median of 10-months follow-up, 33 (58.9%) patients achieved PSA50 after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 treatment and median PSA-PFS was 5.0 months (range: 1.0-15 months) while median OS was not reached. Quantitative analysis of SPECT/CT images showed that 37 patients (66%) had > 30% reduction in Lu-TTV, associated with significantly improved overall survival (median not reached vs. 6 months, P = 0.008) and PSA-PFS (median 6 months vs. 1 months, P < 0.001). However, changes in SUVmax or SUVmean did not correlate with PSA-PFS or OS. We successfully implemented same-day post-therapy SPECT/CT after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 infusions. Quantitation of 1-2h post-therapy SPECT/CT images is a promising method for assessing treatment response. However, the approach is currently limited by its suboptimal detection of small tumor lesions and the necessity of incorporating a third-cycle SPECT/CT to mitigate the effects of any potential treatment-related flare-up. Further investigation in a larger patient cohort and prospective validation is essential to confirm these findings and to explore the role of SPECT/CT as a potential adjunct to PSMA PET/CT in managing mCRPC.

Predicting abiraterone efficacy in advanced prostate cancer: Insights from marker of proliferation Ki67.

KI67 is a well-known biomarker reflecting cell proliferation. We aim to elucidate the predictive role of KI67 in the efficacy of abiraterone for patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Clinicopathological data of 152 men with metastatic PCa, who received abiraterone therapy were retrospectively collected. The KI67 positivity was examined by immunohistochemistry using the prostate biopsy specimen. The predictive value of KI67 on the therapeutic efficacy of abiraterone was explored using Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression analysis. The endpoints included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), and overall survival (OS). In total, 85/152 (55.9%) and 67/152 (44.1%) cases, respectively, received abiraterone at metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) stage. The median KI67 positivity was 20% (interquartile range: 10%-30%). Overall, KI67 rate was not correlated with PSA response. Notably, an elevated KI67-positive rate strongly correlated with unfavorable abiraterone efficacy, with KI67 ≥ 30% and KI67 ≥ 20% identified as the optimal cutoffs for prognosis differentiation in mHSPC (median PSA-PFS: 11.43 Mo vs. 26.43 Mo, p < 0.001; median rPFS: 16.63 Mo vs. 31.90 Mo, p = 0.003; median OS: 21.77 Mo vs. not reach, p = 0.005) and mCRPC (median PSA-PFS: 7.17 Mo vs. 12.20 Mo, p = 0.029; median rPFS: 11.67 Mo vs. 16.47 Mo, p = 0.012; median OS: 21.67 Mo vs. not reach, p = 0.073) patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis supported the independent predictive value of KI67 on abiraterone efficacy. In subgroup analysis, an elevated KI67 expression was consistently associated with unfavorable outcomes in the majority of subgroups. Furthermore, data from another cohort of 79 PCa patients with RNA information showed that those with KI67 RNA levels above the median had a significantly shorter OS than those below the median (17.71 vs. 30.72 Mo, p = 0.035). This study highlights KI67 positivity in prostate biopsy as a strong predictor of abiraterone efficacy in advanced PCa. These insights will assist clinicians in anticipating clinical outcomes and refining treatment decisions for PCa patients.

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ENZA-p): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial

Enzalutamide and lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 both improve overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Androgen and PSMA receptors have a close intracellular relationship, with data suggesting complementary benefit if targeted concurrently. In this study, we assessed the activity and safety of enzalutamide plus adaptive-dosed [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus enzalutamide alone as first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ENZA-p was an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial done at 15 hospitals in Australia. Participants were men aged 18 years or older with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer not previously treated with docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, gallium-68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-PET-CT (PSMA-PET-CT) positive disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and at least two risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by a centralised, web-based system using minimisation with a random component to stratify for study site, disease burden, use of early docetaxel, and previous treatment with abiraterone acetate. Patients were either given oral enzalutamide 160 mg daily alone or with adaptive-dosed (two or four doses) intravenous 7·5 GBq [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 every 6-8 weeks dependent on an interim PSMA-PET-CT (week 12). The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, defined as the interval from the date of randomisation to the date of first evidence of PSA progression, commencement of non-protocol anticancer therapy, or death. The analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population, using stratified Cox proportional hazards regression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04419402, and participant follow-up is ongoing. 162 participants were randomly assigned between Aug 17, 2020, and July 26, 2022. 83 men were assigned to the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group, and 79 were assigned to the enzalutamide group. Median follow-up in this interim analysis was 20 months (IQR 18-21), with 32 (39%) of 83 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 16 (20%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group remaining on treatment at the data cutoff date. Median age was 71 years (IQR 64-76). Median PSA progression-free survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 11·0-17·0) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 7·8 months (95% CI 4·3-11·0) in the enzalutamide group (hazard ratio 0·43, 95% CI 0·29-0·63, p<0·0001). The most common adverse events (all grades) were fatigue (61 [75%] of 81 patients), nausea (38 [47%]), and dry mouth (32 [40%]) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and fatigue (55 [70%] of 79), nausea (21 [27%]), and constipation (18 [23%]) in the enzalutamide group. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 32 (40%) of 81 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 32 (41%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group. Grade 3 events that occurred only in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group included anaemia (three [4%] of 81 participants) and decreased platelet count (one [1%] participant). No grade 4 or 5 events were attributed to treatment on central review in either group. The addition of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 to enzalutamide improved PSA progression-free survival providing evidence of enhanced anticancer activity in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide and warrants further evaluation of the combination more broadly in metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Research Alliance (Movember and Australian Federal Government), St Vincent's Clinic Foundation, GenesisCare, Roy Morgan Research, and Endocyte (a Novartis company).

A Phase II Study of Rucaparib Monotherapy in Nonmetastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Demonstrating "BRCAness" Genotype (ROAR).

Both germline and somatic BReast CAncer gene (BRCA) mutations are poor prognostic markers in men with localized or metastatic prostate cancer. For instance, men with these mutations often are diagnosed with prostate cancer earlier and develop metastatic disease earlier compared with those who do not harbor similar mutations. Patients with germline alterations typically have more advanced disease and shorter overall survival (Castro E, Goh C, Olmos D, et al. Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(14):1748-1757. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.43.1882). The risk of disease progression to metastatic disease is significant in patients with this genotype of prostate cancer. The percentage of patients free from metastatic disease was 90%, 72%, and 50%, respectively, compared with 97%, 94%, and 84% at 3, 5, and 10 years for patients with intact DNA repair (P < .001) (Castro E, Goh C, Leongamornlert D, et al. Effect of BRCA mutations on metastatic relapse and cause-specific survival after radical treatment for localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68(2):186-193. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.022). DNA damage repair non-BRCA mutations include alterations in genes such as ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, and RAD51. While less common than BRCA mutations, they have emerged as significant prognostic markers in prostate cancer. These BRCAness mutations are associated with a higher risk of aggressive disease and poorer survival outcomes. Given the debilitating physical and psychological side effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in relatively younger men with prostate cancer, delaying ADT in these men may be an attractive strategy. Given the proven efficacy of polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in the castration-resistant prostate cancersetting, PARP inhibitor monotherapy in a nonmetastatic castration-sensitive (nmCSPC) setting has the potential to delay metastasis and delay the onset of ADT related symptoms. This is a single-arm, single-center, open-label, phase II trial to assess the efficacy of rucaparib in patients with high-risk biochemically recurrent (BCR) nmHSPC, which was defined as PSA doubling time of <9 months, demonstrating a "BRCAness" genotype (BRCA1/2 and other homologous recombination repair mutations). A total of 15 patients were intended to be enrolled, with an expected enrollment duration of 12 months. Patients were given rucaparib 600 mg orally twice daily and were allowed to remain on study treatment until PSA progression defined by Prostate Cancer Working Group 3, with 2 years of follow-up after study treatment. We anticipated a total of 2-3 years until completion of the clinical trial. The primary endpoint was to assess the PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS). The secondary endpoints of the study were safety, the proportion of patients with a PSA 50% response (PSA 50), and an undetectable PSA. A 4-week treatment duration comprised one cycle. The study started enrolling in June 2019 and was prematurely terminated in June 2022 after the accrual of 7 patients because of changing standard of care treatments with the introduction of next-generation scans, eg, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET). Seven patients were enrolled in the study with the following pathogenic alterations: ATM (n = 3), BRCA2 (n = 2), BRCA1 (n = 1), BRIP1 (n = 1), and RAD51 (n = 1). The median duration of follow-up was 18 months. A median of 20 cycles (range 4-42) was completed, median PSA-PFS was 35.37 months (95% CI, 0-85.11 months). In total, 2 patients achieved PSA50; both also achieved nadir PSA as undetectable. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were anemia and rash (in 1 patient each). No dose-limiting toxicities or severe AEs were seen. Rucaparib demonstrated acceptable toxicity and efficacy signal as an ADT-sparing approach in patients with biochemically recurrent nonmetastatic prostate cancer. It is currently challenging to understand the optimal value of systemic therapy in this disease setting due to the rapidly changing standard of care. Additionally, there are relatively few patients with BRCAness who present with nonmetastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03533946).

Predicting abiraterone efficacy in advanced prostate cancer: Insights from marker of proliferation Ki-67.

176 Background: The marker of proliferation Ki-67 (KI67) is a well-known biomarker reflecting cell proliferation activity and was reported to be associated with the treatment efficacy of chemotherapy in different tumors. However, it is unknown whether KI67 also has a role in predicting the efficacy of the next-generation hormone therapies, e.g., abiraterone, for patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: Clinicopathological data of 144 men with metastatic PCa who received abiraterone therapy were retrospectively collected. The KI67 positivity was examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the prostate biopsy specimen. The predictive value of KI67 and other factors on the therapeutic efficacy of abiraterone treatment was explored. Kaplan-Meier curve and COX regression analysis were used for survival analysis. The endpoints were PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) according to the PCWG3 criteria. Results: Among the 144 included patients, 82 (56.9%) and 62 (43.1%), respectively, received abiraterone therapy at metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) stage. The median KI67 positivity was 20% for the total cohort (interquartile range: 10%-30%). When taken as a continuous variable, KI67 positivity was adversely related to both PSA-PFS (HR, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.01-1.03, P=0.001) and rPFS (HR, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.02-1.03, P=0.001) of the abiraterone therapy, while was not associated with PSA response. The results of multivariate COX regression analysis implied that, after adjusting by mHSPC/mCRPC stage, ISUP grading, pain score, visceral metastasis, and metastatic burden, KI67 was still an independent predictor of PSA-PFS (HR, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.01-1.03, P=0.001) and rPFS (HR, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.01-1.03, P=0.008) of the abiraterone therapy. Moreover, when patients were divided into two groups with high and low KI67, using cutoffs of 10%, 20%, and 30%, KI67 remained a significant predictor of both PSA-PFS (HR: 1.67, 1.91, 2.29; P value: 0.052, 0.004, &lt;0.001) and rPFS (HR: 1.54, 1.83, 1.88; P value: 0.119, 0.008, 0.008) of the abiraterone treatment. Subgroup analysis based on whether patients received abiraterone at mHSPC or mCRPC stage suggested that KI67 30% (median PSA-PFS: 11.4- vs. 27.6-Mo, P&lt;0.001; median rPFS: 16.6- vs. 33.6-Mo, P=0.001) was the optimal cutoff to maximize patient prognostic differentiation for the mHSPC cohort, while KI67 20% (median PSA-PFS: 6.9- vs. 14.9-Mo, P=0.033; median rPFS: 10.1- vs. 16.5-Mo, P=0.030) was the optimal cutoff for the mCRPC cohort. Conclusions: Our study revealed that KI67 positivity in prostate biopsy specimens was a robust predictor of abiraterone efficacy for patients with advanced PCa. Further validation using datasets from other centers is needed to strengthen the findings of our work.

Assessing the clinical utility of rapid post-therapy whole-body digital SPECT/CT in evaluating early treatment response of 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment.

32 Background: Multi-detector cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) based whole-body digital SPECT/CT is a new generation of imaging system. We aim to assess the clinical utility of rapid post-therapy whole-body SPECT/CT scan in evaluating early treatment response of 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with progressive metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who were treated with at least two cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617 at our institution from June 2022 to June 2023. Post-therapy whole-body digital SPECT/CT (GE StarGuide) was performed from vertex to mid-thigh at 1-2 hours after 177Lu-PSMA-617 infusion. Post-therapy SPECT/CT images were quantified with MIM software. Lu177-PSMA positive lesions were delineated with liver parenchyma uptake as cut-off. Lu-PSMA positive total tumor volume (Lu-TTV), tumor SUVmax and SUVmean were obtained. Post-therapy SPECT/CT image after cycle 1 was used as baseline for comparison with SPECT/CT after cycle 2 and 3. Overall survival, PSA progression free survival (PSA-PFS) as defined by PCWG3 and PSA decline &gt; 50% from baseline (PSA50) at any time after treatment were measured. Changes in post-therapy SPECT/CT were correlated with clinical outcomes to assess quantitative SPECT/CT as a tool for early treatment response. Analyses were performed with SPSS. Results: A total of 56 patients (76±8, mean ± SD, range 60-93 years old) who were imaged with at least 2 post-therapy SPECT/CT were included in the analysis. Post-therapy whole body SPECT/CT was acquired in ~12 mins. All scanned patients tolerated the rapid whole-body SPECT/CT very well. With median follow up of 10 months, median PSA-PFS was 5.0 months (range 1.0-15 months), 33 of 56 patients (58.9%) achieved PSA50 at any time after treatment, and 42 of 56 patients (75%) were alive at data cutoff. Quantitative analysis of SPECT/CT images showed that 36 of 56 patients (64%) had a &gt;30% decrease in Lu-TTV on early follow-up post-therapy SPECT/CT after cycle 2 or 3. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that a &gt;30% decrease in Lu-TTV was associated with longer overall survival (median not reached vs 6 months, P = 0.008) and longer PSA-PFS (6 months vs 1 months, P &lt; 0.001). Decrease in SUVmax or SUVmean, however, was not associated with PSA-PFS or overall survival. Conclusions: Rapid post-therapy whole-body digital SPECT/CT was well tolerated in post-therapy SPECT/CT imaging following 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. Quantitation of post-therapy SPECT/CT may be useful in evaluating early treatment response of 177Lu-PSMA-617. Prospective validation and larger patient cohorts are needed to further elucidate the role of post-therapy SPECT/CT imaging in guiding patient management in 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy.

Bipolar androgen therapy plus nivolumab for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: the COMBAT phase II trial

Cyclic high-dose testosterone administration, known as bipolar androgen therapy (BAT), is a treatment strategy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Here, we report the results of a multicenter, single arm Phase 2 study (NCT03554317) enrolling 45 patients with heavily pretreated mCRPC who received BAT (testosterone cypionate, 400 mg intramuscularly every 28 days) with the addition of nivolumab (480 mg intravenously every 28 days) following three cycles of BAT monotherapy. The primary endpoint of a confirmed PSA50 response rate was met and estimated at 40% (N = 18/45, 95% CI: 25.7–55.7%, P = 0.02 one-sided against the 25% null hypothesis). Sixteen of the PSA50 responses were achieved before the addition of nivolumab. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), median PSA progression-free survival, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and safety/tolerability. The ORR was 24% (N = 10/42). Three of the objective responses occurred following the addition of nivolumab. After a median follow-up of 17.9 months, the median rPFS was 5.6 (95% CI: 5.4–6.8) months, and median OS was 24.4 (95% CI: 17.6–31.1) months. BAT/nivolumab was well tolerated, resulting in only five (11%) drug related, grade-3 adverse events. In a predefined exploratory analysis, clinical response rates correlated with increased baseline levels of intratumoral PD-1 + T cells. In paired metastatic tumor biopsies, BAT induced pro-inflammatory gene expression changes that were restricted to patients achieving a clinical response. These data suggest that BAT may augment antitumor immune responses that are further potentiated by immune checkpoint blockade.

Clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone with or without ongoing androgen deprivation therapy: A retrospective case-control study.

Abiraterone and concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are used in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Recently, it has been suggested that the use of abiraterone alone (without ADT) may have comparable efficacy to abiraterone with ongoing ADT. Here, we sought to assess the impact of ADT cessation in patients beginning abiraterone for castration-resistant prostate cancer. We identified 39 patients at our institution who received abiraterone alone (with discontinuation of ADT) between 2011 and 2022. We then procured a comparable group of 39 patients (matched by age, Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level) who received abiraterone with ongoing ADT during the same period. We assessed and compared clinical outcomes in the two groups (abiraterone-alone vs. abiraterone-ADT) with respect to PSA response rates, PSA progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results were adjusted using Cox proportional-hazards multivariable models. The median PSA before treatment initiation was 12.7 (range: 0.2-199) ng/mL in the abiraterone-alone group and 15.5 (range: 0.6-212) ng/mL in the abiraterone-ADT group. Use of abiraterone alone adequately suppressed testosterone levels in 35/37 (94.6%) patients. Patients receiving abiraterone alone had a median PSA reduction of 80.2% versus 79.5% in patients receiving abiraterone plus ADT. The median PSA progression-free survival in patients receiving abiraterone alone was 27.4versus 25.8 months in patients receiving abiraterone plus ADT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-1.71; p = 0.82). In addition, abiraterone alone was associated with an overall survival of 3.6versus 3.1 years in patients receiving abiraterone plus ADT (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.50-1.62; p = 0.72). There were no differences in PFS or OS between groups after performing Cox multivariable regression analyses. Use of abiraterone alone was associated with comparable clinical outcomes to patients who received abiraterone together with ADT. Further prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of abiraterone alone on treatment outcomes and cost savings.

The Impact of PSMA PET-Based Eligibility Criteria Used in the Prospective Phase II TheraP Trial in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radioligand Therapy.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) has shown encouraging results for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the prospective, multicenter, randomized phase II TheraP study. The inclusion criteria for that study comprised a pretherapeutic 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scan showing sufficient tumor uptake using a predefined threshold and the absence of 18F-FDG-positive, PSMA ligand-negative tumor lesions. However, the prognostic value of these PET-based inclusion criteria remains unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of mCRPC patients treated with PSMA RLT using TheraP as well as other TheraP-based PET inclusion criteria. Methods: First, patients were dichotomized into 2 groups whose PSMA PET scans did (TheraP contrast-enhanced PSMA [cePSMA] PET-positive) or did not (TheraP cePSMA PET-negative) fulfill the inclusion criteria of TheraP. Notably, unlike in TheraP, 18F-FDG PET was not performed on our patients. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (PSA decline ≥ 50% from baseline), PSA progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were compared. Additionally, patients were further dichotomized according to predefined SUVmax thresholds different from those used in TheraP to analyze their potential impact on outcome as well. Results: In total, 107 mCRPC patients were included in this analysis (TheraP cePSMA PET-positive, n = 77; TheraP cePSMA PET-negative, n = 30). PSA response rates were higher in TheraP cePSMA PET-positive patients than in TheraP cePSMA PET-negative patients (54.5% vs. 20%, respectively; P = 0.0012). The median PSA progression-free survival (P = 0.007) and OS (P = 0.0007) of patients were significantly longer in the TheraP cePSMA PET-positive group than in the TheraP cePSMA PET-negative group. Moreover, being in the TheraP cePSMA PET-positive group was identified as a significant prognosticator of longer OS (P = 0.003). The application of different SUVmax thresholds for a single hottest lesion demonstrated no influence on outcome in patients eligible for PSMA RLT. Conclusion: Patient selection for PSMA RLT according to the inclusion criteria of TheraP led to a better treatment response and outcome in our preselected patient cohort. However, a relevant number of patients not fulfilling these criteria also showed substantial rates of response.

Phase 2 study of olaparib (without ADT) in men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR) after prostatectomy.

5087 Background: The natural history of BCR after prostatectomy is variable and current treatment approaches include observation, salvage radiation, or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), although many men wish to defer such therapy. We hypothesized that olaparib, now approved for use in certain men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, might be an alternative option for men with high-risk BCR. Methods: This was a single arm, phase 2 trial (NCT03047135) conducted at 4 US sites. Subjects with biochemically recurrent (M0) prostate cancer, post prostatectomy, with a PSA doubling time of ≤6 months and an absolute PSA of ≥1.0 ng/mL were eligible. Patients were NOT selected based on the presence of homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations. 51 patients were treated with olaparib 300mg twice per day, until radiographic or symptomatic progression, PSA doubling from baseline value, or drug-related toxicity. The primary endpoint was PSA50 response (50% PSA decline from baseline). Secondary endpoint was PSA progression free survival (PFS). Patients were required to undergo tissue-based next generation sequencing on the radical prostatectomy specimen to determine the presence of mutations in HRR genes ( ATM, BARD1, BRCA1/2, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK1/2, FANCA/E/L, PALB2, RAD51B/C/D). A prespecified endpoint was to assess PSA responses in HRR[+] and HRR[–] cohorts separately. Results: Mean age was 64 years (SD 7), and 92% (47/51) of patients were White. Mean baseline PSA doubling time was 2.9 (SD 1.5) months. 55% (28/51) of pts had Gleason 6-7, 14% (7/51) had Gleason 8, and 31% (16/51) had Gleason 9-10. 86% (44/51) of patients had previously received salvage radiation. 27 patients harbored HRR mutations, the most common of which were BRCA2 (n=11), CHEK2 (n=6), and ATM (n=6). The overall PSA50 response rate was 24% (12 of 51)(95% CI 0.13, 0.38), with no responses in the HRR[–] group and 44% (12/27) PSA50 responses in the HRR[+] group (95%CI 0.26, 0.65). All 11 of the participants with a BRCA2 mutation achieved a PSA50 response. The median PSA PFS was 22 months in the HRR[+] group and 13 months in the HRR[–] group (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.31, 1.63). Most AEs were low grade. The most common all-grade AEs were fatigue, nausea, leukopenia, anemia, and dysgeusia. Grade-3 AEs were leukopenia (9.8%), ALT/AST increase (3.9%), and anemia (2.0%). There were no grade 4–5 AEs. Conclusions: Olaparib, in the absence of ADT, can be safely administered and demonstrated activity in men with BCR prostate cancer and HRR mutations, especially for BRCA2 mutations. Additional studies to further evaluate olaparib in these patients are indicated. Clinical trial information: NCT03047135 .

Outcomes and prognostic predictors of Lu-177 PSMA radioligand therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (Asian Population Study).

Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy (PSMA-RLT) is a promising therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but there is limited data of its efficacy and safety in Asian population. We aim to explore the clinical outcomes of Lu-177 PSMA-RLT in this population. We evaluated 84 patients with progressive mCRPC receiving Lu-177 PSMA-RLT between 9 May 2018 and 21 February 2022. Lu-177-PSMA-I&T was administered at 6-8-week intervals. Primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (PFS), PSA response rate, clinical response, toxicity assessment, and prognostic indicators. The median OS and PSA PFS were 12.2 and 5.2 months, respectively. PSA decline of ≥50% was observed in 51.8% of patients. Patients achieving PSA response had longer median OS (15.0 vs. 9.5 months, p=.03) and PSA PFS (6.5 vs. 2.9 months, p<.001). Pain score improvement was seen in 19 out of 34 patients. A hematotoxicity of ≥grade 3 was observed in 13 out of 78 patients. Multivariable analyses showed that PSA velocity, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin (Hb), and the number of treatment cycles were independent prognostic indicators for OS. The retrospective design was the main limitation of the study. Our study demonstrated a similar safety and efficacy of Lu-177 PSMA-RLT in Asian mCRPC patients compared to the existing literature. A PSA decline ≥50% was associated with longer OS and PSA PFS. Several prognostic indicators for patient outcomes were also identified.

Complete Cycles of Radium-223 Improve Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether complete cycles of Radium-223 (Ra-223) improved survival in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We retrospectively analyzed mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223 at Taichung Veterans General hospital. Patient and disease characteristics, laboratory results, number of bone metastases, mCRPC treatment sequence, Ra-223 treatment cycles and survival outcomes were collected. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Uni- and multivariate analysis was used to identify clinical-radiologic factors that influence outcomes. From October 2016 to December 2020, 42 patients with mCRPC were enrolled. Twenty-three patients received <4 cycles of Ra-223 for mCRPC and 19 patients received 5-6 cycles. The median PSA progression free survival was 2.07 months in the <4 cycles group, compared to 3.93 months in the 5-6 cycles group (log rank p=0.006). The median overall survival was 3.93 months in the <4 cycles group, compared to 28.5 months in the 5-6 cycles group (log rank p<0.001). In the multivariate model, the course number of Ra-223 and pre-treatment alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were independent risk factors for overall survival. Patients who complete 5-6 cycles of Ra-223 had significantly better overall survival than those who didn't. Patients with a lower pre-treatment ALP were more likely to benefit from Ra-223 treatment.

Efficacy of systemic therapy following [177Lu] Lu-PSMA in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

77 Background: [177Lu]Lu-PSMA (LuPSMA) is currently FDA-approved for use in the post-taxane, post-antiandrogen setting in pts with mCRPC. Little is known about the efficacy of treatment in pts with subsequent progression after LuPSMA. In this single-centre retrospective analysis, we evaluated efficacy of first subsequent therapy following LuPSMA. Methods: 234 mCRPC pts who received LuPSMA at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre from 2015-2022 were analysed. Pts were excluded if they did not receive any subsequent treatment (n=136), if they received the initial course of LuPSMA in combination with another therapy (n=10), or if insufficient follow-up data were available (n=15).Retreatment withLuPSMA was considered a subsequent line of therapy. Data collected included 50% PSA response rate (PSA-RR), PSA-progression free survival (PSA-PFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival outcomes were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Of 73 evaluable pts, 32 were retreated with LuPSMA (median 2 cycles); and 41 commenced a new line of systemic therapy. In the LuPSMA retreatment group, the PSA-RR was 44%, median PSA-PFS was 3.8 months and median OS 14.8 months. In pts who changed to a new line of treatment, cabazitaxel was the most commonly prescribed therapy (n=25), followed by docetaxel (n=7), and single-agent carboplatin (n=4), in addition to carboplatin/etoposide, mitoxantrone, olaparib, capecitabine and a clinical trial (n=1 for each). PSA-RR was 12%, median PSA-PFS was 3.5 months and median OS 6.6 months. Conclusions: This retrospective data demonstrates that retreatment with LuPSMA is associated with benefit, though this is reduced compared to initial treatment. In our cohort of pts who commenced a new line of therapy, most were not suitable for retreatment with LuPSMA, potentially reflecting de-differentiated and more aggressive disease phenotypes. In those not suitable for LuPSMA retreatment, other systemic therapy appears to have limited benefit, highlighting the lack of effective salvage options and raising questions about treatment sequencing. [Table: see text]

A phase I trial of androgen deprivation, darolutamide, and ipatasertib in a safety cohort with castration-resistant prostate cancer (ADDITION).

174 Background: Alterations activating the PI3K-AKT pathway are found in 40-50% of patients with aggressive prostate cancer. This leads to an abrogated response to therapy with androgen-receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and is associated with poor outcomes. Preclinical in vivo models suggest there is synergy between ARPIs and AKT inhibitors. Methods: This is a single-arm study of the AR inhibitor darolutamide, the AKT inhibitor ipatasertib, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The phase I safety cohort included patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). ADT was administered per institutional standards. Patients started with a lead-in of ipatasertib for 7 days, followed by ipatasertib combined with darolutamide 600 mg BID. The starting dose of ipatasertib was 400 mg daily with plans to de-escalate if ≥ 2 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were identified in the first six patients. The DLT period was the first 4 weeks of combination therapy. The primary endpoint was to identify the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of ipatasertib. A phase II biomarker-selected cohort was planned to receive the combination neoadjuvantly. That portion of the study was terminated prior to patient enrollment due to the withdrawal of industry support. Results: Six patients with metastatic CRPC were enrolled in the phase I cohort. They had received a median of 3 prior systemic therapies in addition to ADT (range 1-6). All patients completed the DLT period, and no DLTs were observed. The RP2D of ipatasertib, when given with darolutamide, is 400mg daily. Two patients (33%) had serious adverse events (SAEs) (diarrhea; grade 3) related to ipatasertib outside the DLT period. Two patients (33%) had SAEs unrelated to study drugs; pyelonephritis (one patient; grade 3) secondary to obstruction, and respiratory failure (one patient; grade 5) attributed to disease progression. Two (33%) patients had at least a 50% decline in PSA as the best PSA response, including 2 of 3 patients with known PI3K pathway alterations. Median PSA progression free survival (PFS) was 3.35 months (95% CI 3.06-NA). Median radiographic PFS was 2.91 months (95% CI 2.79-NA). Conclusions: Combination therapy with darolutamide and ipatasertib in CRPC is safe and a RP2D of ipatasertib was established. Toxicity was similar to the therapies given alone, and the most common treatment-related SAE was diarrhea. Partial response to combination therapy was seen in men with CRPC and known PI3K alterations. Clinical trial information: NCT04737109 .