Median Progression-free Survival Time Research Articles

Percutaneous ablation treatment in metastatic lung tumors: a single-center experience

In recent years, many studies have proven that percutaneous thermal ablation is an effective second-line treatment method with low complication rates in early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma and lung metastases. Radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation are commonly used for this purpose. To evaluate the factors affecting the success of the percutaneous thermal ablation treatment with technical success, complication rates, and long-term follow-up results in metastatic lung lesions. Computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous ablation was performed for 70 metastatic lung lesions in 35 patients (22 men, 13 women; mean age = 61.34 years; age range = 41-75 years). Radiofrequency ablation was performed in 53/70 (75.7%) lesions and microwave ablation in 17/70 (24.3%) lesions. The technical success rate was 98.6%. Median overall survival, progression-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival of the patients were 33.9 months (range=25.6-42.1 months), 12 months (range=4.9-19.2 months), and 24.2 months (range=8.2-40.1 months), respectively. One- and two-year overall survival rates were 84% and 74%, respectively. Median progression-free survival times were 20.3 months and 11.4 months, respectively, according to the number of metastatic lung lesions being single and multiple, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.046). According to the number of lesions ≤3 and >3, the difference was also found statistically significant (P = 0.024) (14.3 months and 5.7 months, respectively). In conclusion, CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation is a safe and effective treatment method in metastatic lung lesions. The number of lesions is the most important factor in predicting treatment success.

Impact of first-line systemic therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

The study goal was to compare the outcomes of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev) as either first- or later-line systemic therapy. A total of 430 patients with HCC treated with Atezo/Bev at 22 institutions in Japan were included. Patients treated with Atezo/Bev as first-line therapy for HCC were defined as the first-line group (n=268) while those treated with Atezo/Bev as second- or later-line therapy were defined as the later-line group (n=162). The median progression-free survival times in the first- and later-line groups were 7.7months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7-9.2) and 6.2months (95% CI, 5.0-7.7) (P=0.021). Regarding treatment-related adverse events, hypertension of any grade was more common in the first-line group than in the later-line group (P=0.025). Analysis adjusted by inverse probability weighting, including patient and HCC characteristics, showed that the later-line group (hazard ratio, 1.304; 95% CI, 1.006-1.690; P=0.045) was significantly associated with progression-free survival. In patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B, the median progression-free survival times in the first- and later-line groups were 10.5months (95% CI, 6.8-13.8) and 6.8months (95% CI, 5.0-9.4) (P=0.021). Among patients with a history of lenvatinib therapy, the median progression-free survival times in the first- and later-line groups were 7.7months (95% CI, 6.3-9.2) and 6.2months (95% CI, 5.0-7.7) (P=0.022). The use of Atezo/Bev as first-line systemic therapy in patients with HCC is expected to prolong survival.

Continuous low-dose cyclophosphamide plus prednisone in the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma with severe complications.

We retrospectively analyzed the effective and safety of continuous low-dose cyclophosphamide combined with prednisone (CP) in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients with severe complications. A total of 130 RRMM patients with severe complications were enrolled in this study, among which 41 patients were further given bortezomib, lenalidomide, thalidomide or ixazomib on the basis of CP regimen (CP+X group). The response to therapy, adverse events (AEs), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were recorded. Among the 130 patients, 128 patients received therapeutic response assessment, with a complete remission rate (CRR) and objective response rate (ORR) of 4.7% and 58.6%, respectively. The median OS and PFS time were (38.0 ± 3.6) and (22.9±5.2) months, respectively. The most common AEs were hyperglycemia (7.7%), pneumonia (6.2%) and Cushing's syndrome (5.4%). In addition, we found the pro-BNP/BNP level was obviously decreased while the LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction) was increased in RRMM patients following CP treatment as compared with those before treatment. Furthermore, CP+X regimen further improved the CRR compared with that before receiving the CP+X regimen (24.4% vs. 2.4%, P=0.007). Also, both the OS and PFS rates were significantly elevated in patients received CP+X regimen following CP regimen as compared with the patients received CP regimen only. This study demonstrates the metronomic chemotherapy regimen of CP is effective to RRMM patients with severe complications.

Sequential therapy with crizotinib and a second-generation ALK inhibitor versus direct therapy of a second-generation ALK inhibitor in ALK-positive advanced lung cancer: a real-world study.

There are few real-world studies in which the efficacy of sequential crizotinib and second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are compared with direct therapy of second-generation ALK TKI in ALK-positive advanced lung cancer. Between May 2014 and October 2022, 211 patients from the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital who harbored ALK rearrangement were analyzed. Of these patients, 115 received crizotinib with sequential second-generation ALK TKIs, and 96 patients received a second-generation ALK TKI directly. The survival analysis of median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and central nervous system time to progression (CNS TTP) in the various groups were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Of the 211 lung cancer patients with ALK rearrangement, there were no statistical differences in PFS (25.27 vs. 20.47 months, P=0.644) and OS (70.27 months vs. not reached, P=0.991) between the 115 patients in the sequential therapy group and the 96 patients in the direct second-generation group. In the patients with baseline brain metastases at study entry (n=54), the sequential therapy group had a significantly shorter median CNS TTP than the direct second-generation group (10.40 vs. 22.40 months, P=0.040). Multivariate analyses revealed that the prognostic factors for PFS included performance status (PS, P=0.047) and brain metastases (P=0.010). For OS, the prognostic factors included PS (P=0.047) and liver metastases (P=0.021). There was no statistical difference in efficacy between first-generation sequential second-generation ALK TKIs and direct therapy of second-generation ALK TKI regimens. The CNS efficacy of the direct second-generation group was better than that of the sequential therapy group. The prognostic factors for PFS included PS and brain metastases, while the prognostic factors for OS, PS and liver metastases were included.

A novel prednisone premedication protocol significantly decreases infusion‑related reactions of rituximab in newly diagnosed diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma.

Rituximab is a widely used anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with a high incidence of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during administration. Reducing the incidence of IRRs remains problematic in hematological practices. In the present study, a novel strategy of a prednisone pretreatment regimen was designed similar to the combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) with the aim of exploring the effect on the incidence of IRRs to rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A prospective, randomized (1:1) and controlled study was conducted in three regional hospitals in two groups (n=44 for each group): i) A control group treated with standard R-CHOP-like regimen; and ii) a group receiving a prednisone-pretreatment, modified R-CHOP-like protocol for newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL. The primary endpoint was to assess the incidence of IRRs to rituximab, as well as the association of IRRs with the efficacy of treatment. The second endpoint involved clinical outcomes. The total incidence of IRRs to rituximab in the treatment group was significantly lower compared with that in the control group (15.9 vs. 43.2%; P=0.0051). The different grade incidence of IRRs was lower in the treatment group compared with that in the control group (P=0.0053). In total, 29.5% of patients (26/88) experienced >1 IRR episode. The incidence of IRRs in the pre-treatment group was decreased compared with that in the control group in the 1st cycle (15.9 vs. 43.2%; P=0.0051) and 2nd cycle (6.8 vs. 27.3%; P=0.0107). The overall response rate was similar between the two groups (P>0.05). Median progression-free survival and median overall survival time were not statistically distinct between the two groups (P=0.5244 and P=0.5778, respectively). Grade ≥III toxicities mainly included vomiting and nausea (<20%), leukopenia and granulocytopenia (<20%), and alopecia (<25%). No death events were reported. Apart from IRRs to rituximab, the incidence of other adverse events was similar in both groups. The novel prednisone-pretreatment R-CHOP-like protocol in the present study significantly decreased the total and different grade incidences of IRRs to rituximab among newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL. This clinical trial was retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number, ChiCTR2300070327; date of registration, 10 April 2023).

Development of a Multivariate Prognostic Model for Lenvatinib Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Lenvatinib is a first-line agent for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but individual responses to treatment are highly heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical parameters that influence the efficacy of Lenvatinib and to develop a prognostic model. We retrospectively enrolled 333 Lenvatinib-treated patients with HCC with a median age of 57 years. Two hundred nd sixty-three of these patients had BCLC (2022) stage C. The median overall survival (mOS) time within the cohort was 12.1 months, and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) time was 4.7 months. Univariate Cox regression, best subset regression, and Lasso regression were used to screen primary variables for possible contribution to OS, multivariate Cox analysis was used to fit selected models, and the final model was selected using the maximum area under the curve (AUC) and minimum AIC. Receiver operating curves (ROC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis were plotted to assess model performance, and 5-fold cross-validation was performed for internal validation. X-tile software was used to select the best cutoff points and to divide the study cohort into 3 different risk groups. Seven variables were included in the final model: BCLC stage, prior transarterial chemoembolization and immunotherapy history, tumor number, prognostic nutritional index, log (alpha-fetoprotein), and log (platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio). We named this final model the "multivariate prognostic model for Lenvatinib" (MPML), and a nomogram was constructed to predict the probability of survival at 6, 9, and 12 months. The MPML had good discrimination, calibration, and applicability. Cross-validation showed mean AUC values of 0.7779, 0.7738, and 0.7871 at 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. According to nomogram points, mOS time was 21.57, 8.70, and 5.37 months in the low, medium, and high-risk groups, respectively (P < .001), and these differences were also observed in the PFS survival curve (P < .001). The MPML stratified patients according to baseline clinical characteristics had a strong performance in predicting Lenvatinib efficacy and has the potential for use as an auxiliary clinical tool for individualized decision-making.

OncoVee™-MiniPDX-guided anticancer treatment for HER2-negative intermediate-advanced gastric cancer patients: a single-arm, open-label phase I clinical study

BackgroundChemotherapy is the main treatment strategy for patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer (GC); yet, many patients do not respond well to treatment. This study evaluated the sensitivity of a mini patient-derived xenograft (MiniPDX) animal model in patients with HER2-negative intermediate-advanced GC.MethodsIn this single-arm, open-label clinical study, we consecutively recruited patients with HER2-negative advanced or recurrent GC from September 2018 to July 2021. Tumor tissues were subjected to MiniPDX drug sensitivity tests for screening individualized anti-tumor drugs; appropriate drug types or combinations were selected based on drug screening results. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR).ResultsA total of 17 patients were screened, and 14 eligible patients were included.The median follow-up time was 9 (2–34) months. The median PFS time was 14.1 (2–34) months, the median OS time was 16.9 (2–34) months, ORR was 42.9% (6/14), and DCR was 92.9% (13/14). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were fatigue (14 (100%)), anorexia (13 (93%)) and insomnia (12 (86%)), and the most common grade 3 or worse TRAE was fatigue (6 (43%)), and anorexia (6 (43%)). The occurrence rate of myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, abnormal liver enzymes, and other grade 3–4 chemotherapy adverse reactions were relatively low, and no grade 5 treatment-related adverse events occurred.ConclusionScreening HER2-negative medium-advanced GC/GJC chemotherapy regimens and targeted drugs based on MiniPDX animal models showed good tumor activity and safety.

A Real-world Study on the Incidence and Outcome of Immune-related Adverse Events in Lung Cancer Patients

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are commonly occurred in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, evidence of irAEs derived from the Chinese population is relatively lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and outcomes of irAEs in Chinese patients with lung cancer after receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Clinical and follow-up data from lung cancer patients who received at least one time of ICIs from January 2018 to September 2021 at Huadong Hospital, Fudan University were included. Statistical descriptions and Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze the overall incidence of irAEs, as well as the incidence and outcomes of each type of irAEs. 135 patients were included in the study. 106 patients (78.5%) presented at least one type of irAEs, and the median time to first irAEs onset was 28 d. Most irAEs occurred at early time after treatment, and most irAEs were mild-moderate and reversible. 57 patients (42.2%) died at the study cutoff. The mortality rate of severe irAEs was 12.6% (n=17), and among them 7 patients (41.2%) died of pneumonitis. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) time of the total population was 505 d (95%CI: 352-658) and 625 d (95%CI: 491-759), respectively. Patients who presented any irAEs achieved a longer PFS than those who did not (median PFS: 533 d vs 179 d, P=0.037, HR=0.57), while patients who presented skin toxicities achieved a longer OS than patients who did not (median OS: 797 d vs 469 d, P=0.006, HR=0.70). In real-world settings, irAEs in lung cancer patients were commonly observed, with pneumonitis as the most common fatal irAEs. In addition, patients who presented any irAEs may tend to achieve a longer PFS.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic markers in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with atezolizumab in combination with chemotherapy.

Atezolizumab is now the standard treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Herein, we investigated the prognostic role of inflammatory markers in patients treated with atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and evaluated the efficacy and safety of adding atezolizumab to chemotherapy for patients with ES-SCLC and prognostic and predictive factors as a real-life experience. This retrospective study included 55 patients who received front-line atezolizumab with etoposide plus platin regimen for ES-SCLC. We analyzed the survival outcomes and factors that may predict response and survival. The objective response rate (ORR) was 81.8%. At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 10.8 months, and the median overall survival (OS) time was 15.2 months. In univariate analysis for PFS, limited-stage disease at the time of diagnosis, the presence of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), the presence of liver metastasis, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were found to be prognostic factors (P = .041, P = .034, P = .031, P = .004, and P = <.001, respectively). In other words, while the median PFS time was 14.1 months in patients with PLR ≤ 135.7, it was 7.5 months in patients with > 135.7. Similarly, median PFS was 14.9 months in patients with NLR ≤ 3.43, while it was 9.6 months in patients with > 3.43. Univariate analysis for OS revealed that limited stage at the time of diagnosis, NLR and PLR were significant prognostic indicators (P = .01, P = .006, and P = .007, respectively). Median OS time for patients with both NLR ≤ 3.43 and PLR ≤ 135.7 was significantly better than that of patients with NLR > 3.43 and PLR > 135.7 (16.9 vs 11.3 and 16.9 vs 11.5 months, respectively). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that PLR was an independent significant predictive factor for the response to atezolizumab plus chemotherapy (OR: 0.07, P = .028). The patients with PLR ≤ 135.7 were significantly good responders to atezolizumab plus chemotherapy treatment. Real-life data demonstrated a significant correlation between survival and NLR and, PLR in ES-SCLC patients treated with atezolizumab. In addition, PLR was a significant predictive indicator of response to atezolizumab plus chemotherapy.

Abstract CT165: Phase II study of nivolumab and ipilimumab for treatment of metastatic/recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of all anatomic sites of origin and other malignant salivary gland tumors

Abstract Introduction: Dual checkpoint inhibitor therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab has been FDA-approved for a number of different cancers including melanoma, recurrent NSCLC, and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, their role in the treatment of ACC and other salivary gland carcinomas is not well established. Methods: We performed a Simon’s two-stage prospective single-institution phase II clinical trial of nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) with ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks), both of which were provided until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. Two cohorts were analyzed: patients with metastatic/recurrent ACC and patients with other salivary gland cancers. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (PFS) based on RECIST and immune-related RECIST (irRECIST) criteria; secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results: Patients with ACC (n=19) and other salivary gland carcinomas (total n=5; parotid gland adenocarcinoma (n=3), salivary duct carcinoma (n=1), and myoepithelial carcinoma (n=1)) were enrolled between May 2017 and July 2019. Among the patients with ACC, the median OS was 30.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.3 months to not reached), the median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI 5.5 - 30.0 months), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 53% (10/19). The ORR in the ACC group was 5% (CR 0%, n=0; confirmed PR 5%, n=1) using both RECIST and irRECIST criteria, with one patient having continued stable disease at the time of trial conclusion. In the salivary gland tumor cohort, the median OS was 10.4 months (95% CI 6.21 months to not reached), the median PFS time was 6.21 months (95% CI 2.83 months to not reached), and the DCR was 40% (2/5). The ORR in this cohort was 0% using both RECIST and irRECIST criteria. Across both cohorts, platelet counts above the joint cohort’s median were significantly associated with better OS (p=0.032) and PFS (p=0.046). Additionally, although not significant, there was a trend for improved OS and PFS among patients with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios &amp;gt;5 (OS p=0.42, PFS p=0.25) and above median neutrophil counts (OS p=0.24, PFS p=0.18). Four patients with ACC underwent circulating tumor DNA sequencing, resulting in the identification of two MYB-NFIB translocations, one NOTCH1 Cys1383 frameshift mutation, one MTOR N1760K mutation, and one PDGFRA copy number gain. Common immune-related toxicities include fatigue (54%), lymphocytopenia (46%), and anemia (42%) with lymphocytopenia being the most common grade III/IV adverse event. Conclusion: In patients with recurrent or metastatic ACC and other salivary gland neoplasms, combination nivolumab with ipilimumab resulted in moderate disease control. Further studies are warranted to validate our findings. Citation Format: Young Kwang Chae, Richard Duan, Liam Il-Young Chung, Youjin Oh, Maria Matsangou, Mark Agulnik, Victoria Villaflor, Devalingam Mahalingam. Phase II study of nivolumab and ipilimumab for treatment of metastatic/recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of all anatomic sites of origin and other malignant salivary gland tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT165.

MRI-measured periprostatic adipose tissue volume as a prognostic predictor in prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

ABSTRACT In this study, we evaluated the association between the PPAT volume and the prognosis of PCa patients after LRP. We retrospectively analysed data of 189 PCa patients who underwent LRP in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital. Volumes of PPAT and prostate were measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and normalized PPAT volume was computed (PPAT volume divided by prostate volume). Patients were then stratified into the high-PPAT group (n = 95) and low-PPAT group (n = 94) by the median of normalized PPAT volume (73%). The high-PPAT group had significantly higher Gleason score (total score 8 or more, 39.0% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.001) and pathological stage (stage T3b, 28.4% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.048). No significant correlation between normalized PPAT volume and body mass index (ρ = −0.012, p = 0.872) was observed. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed the high-PPAT group had significantly shorter biochemical recurrence (BCR) interval (median progression-free survival time 15.9 months vs. 32.7 months, p = 0.001). Univiarate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed high normalized PPAT volume (>73%) (hazard ratio 1.787 [1.075–3.156], p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for BCR post-operatively. In conclusion, MRI-measured PPAT volume is of significant prognostic value for PCa patients undergoing LRP.

Single-agent temozolomide as salvage therapy in heavily pretreated metastatic sarcoma patients.

Treatment options for patients with metastatic sarcoma are limited. The goal of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of temozolomide in pretreated patients with soft tissue sarcoma. We recorded the pathological, clinical, and treatment data of the patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma retrospectively. We evaluated the efficacy and side effects of temozolomide in this patient group. This study involved 16 patients. The average age was detected as 48 (21-73) years. Six (37.5%) patients had de-novo metastatic disease at diagnosis. Primary of tumors had originated from intra-abdominal (43.7%), extremity (31.3%), head-and-neck (12.5%), and intrathoracic (12.5%) regions. The patients previously had received at least two different chemotherapy regimens (75%), pazopanib (50%) and palliative radiotherapy (31.3%). Temozolomide-related median progression-free survival time was found as 3.5 (95% CI, 2.6-4.3) months. One patient (6.3%) had a partial response, while four patients (25%) had stable disease. Nine individuals (56.3%) had grade 1-2 adverse events, while one patient (6.3%) had grade 3-4 adverse events. We observed that temozolomide was well tolerated but had limited efficacy in the treatment of metastatic sarcoma patients. In patients with extensively pretreated soft tissue sarcoma, temozolomide may be considered a therapeutic option as a single-agent.

Diagnosis and treatment of primary seminoma of the prostate: A case report and review of literature

Primary seminoma of the prostate (PSP) is a rare type of extragonadal germ cell tumour that is easily misdiagnosed, owing to the lack of specific clinical features. It is therefore necessary for clinicians to work toward improving the accuracy of PSP diagnosis. A 59-year-old male patient presenting with acute urinary retention was admitted to a local hospital. A misdiagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia led to an improper prostatectomy. Histopathology revealed PSP invading the bladder neck and bilateral seminal vesicles. Further radiotherapy treatment for the local lesion was performed, and the patient had a disease-free survival period of 96 mo. This case was analysed along with 13 other cases of PSP identified from the literature. Only four of the cases (28.6%) were initially confirmed by prostate biopsy. In these cases, imaging examinations showed an enlarged prostate (range 6-11 cm) involving the bladder neck (13/14). Of the 14 total cases, 11 (78.6%) presented typical pure seminoma cell features, staining strongly positive for placental alkaline phosphatase, CD117, and OCT4. The median age at diagnosis was 51 (range 27-59) years, and patients had a median progression-free survival time of 48 (range 6-156) mo after treatment by cisplatin-based chemotherapy combined with surgery or radiotherapy. The remaining three were cases of mixed embryonal tumours with focal seminoma, which had clinical features similar to those of pure PSP, in addition that they also had elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein, beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactose dehydrogenase. PSP should be considered in patients younger than 60 years with an enlarged prostate invading the bladder neck. Further prostate biopsies may aid in proper PSP diagnosis. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is still the main primary therapy for PSP.

MP32-01 ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA AFTER DISCONTINUING PEMBROLIZUMAB AS A SECOND-LINE TREATMENT: A RETROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER REAL-WORLD COHORT STUDY

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP32-01 ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA AFTER DISCONTINUING PEMBROLIZUMAB AS A SECOND-LINE TREATMENT: A RETROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER REAL-WORLD COHORT STUDY Toyohiro Yamada, Risa Tomioka, Tomohiro Yokoyama, Fumiya Sugino, Naoya Kumada, Shinichi Takeuchi, Makoto Kawase, Manabu Takai, Daiki Kato, Koji Iinuma, Keita Nakane, and Takuya Koie Toyohiro YamadaToyohiro Yamada More articles by this author , Risa TomiokaRisa Tomioka More articles by this author , Tomohiro YokoyamaTomohiro Yokoyama More articles by this author , Fumiya SuginoFumiya Sugino More articles by this author , Naoya KumadaNaoya Kumada More articles by this author , Shinichi TakeuchiShinichi Takeuchi More articles by this author , Makoto KawaseMakoto Kawase More articles by this author , Manabu TakaiManabu Takai More articles by this author , Daiki KatoDaiki Kato More articles by this author , Koji IinumaKoji Iinuma More articles by this author , Keita NakaneKeita Nakane More articles by this author , and Takuya KoieTakuya Koie More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003265.01AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The treatment options are currently limited, and the oncological outcomes remain unclear for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) with or without third-line systemic therapy. We aimed to evaluate the oncological outcomes in real-world daily clinical practice after platinum-based chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab for mUC. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included patients with mUC who received second-line pembrolizumab in Japan. The patients were divided into the treatment group (those who received third-line treatment) and BSC group (those who did not receive other treatments). The primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate the oncological outcomes. Of 126 patients enrolled in this study, 40 received third-line therapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 8.0 months. The median overall survival (OS) times were nine months in the BSC group and 17 months in the treatment group (p<0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) times were four months in the BSC group and 14 months in the treatment group (p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, performance status and liver metastasis were significantly associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: Third-line therapy may have clinical potential advantages to improve the oncological outcomes in patients with mUC.Further prospective studies and long-term evaluations in large patient populations are required to identify the useful predictive markers for determining patients with mUC who should continue pembrolizumab treatment for a relatively long term. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e439 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Toyohiro Yamada More articles by this author Risa Tomioka More articles by this author Tomohiro Yokoyama More articles by this author Fumiya Sugino More articles by this author Naoya Kumada More articles by this author Shinichi Takeuchi More articles by this author Makoto Kawase More articles by this author Manabu Takai More articles by this author Daiki Kato More articles by this author Koji Iinuma More articles by this author Keita Nakane More articles by this author Takuya Koie More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Characteristics and prognosis of rrDLBCL with TP53 mutations and a high-risk subgroup represented by the co-mutations of DDX3X-TP53.

TP53 mutations have a prognostic significance in relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (rrDLBCL) patients, and their treatment still faces a great challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of patients with TP53 mutations (TP53mut) in the context of CAR-T therapy (Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) as well as explore the heterogeneity in their cohort and identify the possible risk factors. A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the clinical characteristics of rrDLBCL patients with TP53 mutations and their prognostic factors, receiving CAR-T therapy. And the expression level of TP53 and DDX3X, which was an important co-mutation of TP53 revealed in the cohort, were explored in public databases and cell lines. The median overall survival time of 40 patients with TP53 mutations was 24.5months, while their median progression-free survival time after CAR-T was 6.8months. There were no significant differences in the ORR (objective remission rate, X2 =3.0498, p > 0.05) and PFS (after CAR-T therapy) between the patients with wild-type and mutated TP53 genes after CAR-T therapy, while the OS of patients with TP53 mutations was significantly worse (p < 0.01). In patients with TP53 mutations, the performance status (ECOG score) was identified as the most important prognostic factor, while the efficacies of induction and salvage treatments were also correlated with the prognosis. Among molecular indicators, the co-mutations of Chr-17 and those located on the exon 5 of the TP53 gene showed a tendency for a worse prognosis. Moreover, the patients with TP53-DDX3X co-mutations were identified as a subgroup with an extremely bad prognosis. The expression levels of DDX3X and TP53 were explored in a public database and the cell lines with their co-mutations, which indicated that inhibiting the DDX3X gene could affect the proliferation of rrDLBCL cells and the expression of TP53. This study indicated rrDLBCL patients with TP53 mutations was still the group of poor prognosis in the CAR-T therapy era. CAR-T therapy can benefit some TP53mut patients, and the performance status (ECOG) might help predict their prognosis. The study also revealed a subgroup of TP53-DDX3X co-mutations in rrDLBCL, which showed a strong clinical significance.

Pomalidomide and dexamethasone until progression after first salvage therapy in multiple myeloma.

Lenalidomide maintenance in myeloma is well established. Nevertheless, pomalidomide could provide an alternative. Myeloma patients in first relapse, initially treated in the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) 2009 trial, and subsequently in the IFM 2013-01 phase 2 trial, received four cycles of salvage therapy with pomalidomide plus cyclophosphamide plus dexamethasone (PCD) with transplantation plus 2 PCD consolidation or without transplantation but with 5 PCD and for all patients pomalidomide plus dexamethasone maintenance therapy. This consisted of 28-day cycles of pomalidomide 4 mg daily on days 1-21 and dexamethasone 20 mg weekly until progression. The primary endpoint was an improved response to treatment. A total of 75/100 patients reached therapy. The median follow-up time was 73 months. The median duration of treatment was 23.7 months. One third of patients improved their response from the initiation of treatment: 11%, 19% and 4% to a very good partial response, complete response or stringent complete response respectively. The median progression-free survival time was 33.2 months and the median overall survival time was not reached. Among the 75 patients, the reasons for pomalidomide discontinuation were progressive disease (54%), adverse events (AEs) (30%), investigator discretion (11%) and consent withdrawal (5%). Grade (G) 3/4 haematological AEs included neutropenia (51%) and lymphopenia (35%); G3/4 drug-related non-haematological AEs (>5%) comprised 13% infections. Long-term administration of pomalidomide and dexamethasone is feasible and one third of the patients improved their response.

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of single-agent etoposide intra-CSF chemotherapy in children and young people with relapsed/refractory central nervous system tumours

PurposeThe aim of the project was to evaluate intra-CSF etoposide administration in a palliative setting for children and young people with relapsed/refractory central nervous system (CNS) tumours, with the primary endpoints being overall survival and progression-free survival time. A safety endpoint was to assess the side effect profile and complications of intra-CSF etoposide.MethodsThirty-five patients under the age of 30 years (median age: 5.33 years) were enrolled onto the project. The cross-centre study was a service evaluation, with a data collection spreadsheet designed in Nottingham and completed by both Nottingham and Oxford centres. Data was analysed using SPSS, assessing the overall survival and progression-free survival times, as well as the 6-month and 1-year survival rates.ResultsThe median overall survival and progression-free survival times were 10.97 and 5.91 months, respectively. The 6-month and 1-year overall survival rates were 67% and 48%, and the progression-free survival rates were 50% and 22%. Age at the start of intra-CSF therapy was significantly associated with overall survival (P = 0.046), with the 6 + age group having improved overall survival. Treatment type was significantly associated with overall survival (P = 0.012), with etoposide intra-CSF treatment being associated with improved overall survival. Treatment duration was significantly associated with both overall survival (P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (P < 0.001).ConclusionIntra-CSF etoposide treatment has shown to increase both overall and progression-free survival significantly, whilst having few side effects and maintaining a good quality of life for patients, reflecting it as a beneficial therapy in the palliative setting.

Clinical outcomes of lenvatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization with or without programmed death receptor-1 inhibitors in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors have been approved as second-line treatment regimen in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but it is still worth studying whether patients can benefit from PD-1 inhibitors as first-line drugs combined with targeted drugs and locoregional therapy. To estimate the clinical outcome of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors for patients with unresectable HCC (uHCC). We carried out retrospective research of 65 patients with uHCC who were treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from September 2017 to February 2022. 45 patients received the PD-1 inhibitors, lenvatinib, TACE (PD-1-Lenv-T) therapy, and 20 received the lenvatinib, TACE (Lenv-T) therapy. In terms of the dose of lenvatinib, 8 mg was given orally for patients weighing less than 60 kg and 12 mg for those weighing more than 60 kg. Of the patients in the PD-1 inhibitor combination group, 15 received Toripalimab, 14 received Toripalimab, 14 received Camrelizumab, 4 received Pembrolizumab, 9 received Sintilimab, and 2 received Nivolumab, 1 with Tislelizumab. According to the investigators' assessment, TACE was performed every 4-6 wk when the patient had good hepatic function (Child-Pugh class A or B) until disease progression occurred. We evaluated the efficacy by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST criteria). We accessd the safety by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v 5.0. The key adverse events (AEs) after the initiation of combination therapy were observed. Patients with uHCC who received PD-1-Lenv-T therapy (n = 45) had a clearly longer overall survival than those who underwent Lenv-T therapy (n = 20, 26.8 vs 14.0 mo; P = 0.027). The median progression-free survival time between the two treatment regimens was also measured {11.7 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.7-15.7] in the PD-1-Lenv-T group vs 8.5 mo (95%CI: 3.0-13.9) in the Lenv-T group (P = 0.028)}. The objective response rates of the PD-1-Lenv-T group and Lenv-T group were 44.4% and 20% (P = 0.059) according to the mRECIST criteria, meanwhile the disease control rates were 93.3% and 64.0% (P = 0.003), respectively. The type and frequency of AEs showed little distinction between patients received the two treatment regimens. Our results suggest that the early combination of PD-1 inhibitors has manageable toxicity and hopeful efficacy in patients with uHCC.

Effectiveness of proton beam therapy for liver oligometastatic recurrence in patients with postoperative esophagus cancer.

There are several reports of hepatic resection for postoperative hepatic metastatic recurrence of esophageal cancer. However, it is unclear whether surgery is the best local treatment for liver metastases. Thus, this study aimed to retrospectively analyze proton beam therapy (PBT) for postoperative liver metastatic recurrence of esophageal cancer without extrahepatic lesions and examine outcomes and adverse events. This single-center historical cohort study selected patients who underwent PBT at our proton therapy center between 2012 and 2018. The patients were selected based on the following criteria: primary esophagus carcinoma was resection and metachronous liver oligometastasis recurrence without extrahepatic tumors and no more than three liver metastases. This study included seven males with a median age of 66 (range, 58-78) years, and 15 lesions were included in the study. The median tumor size was 22.6 (7-55.3) mm. The most frequent dose was 72.6 Gy relative biological effect (RBE)/22 fractions (fr) for four lesions and 64 Gy (RBE)/8 fr for four lesions. The median survival time was 35.5 (13.2-119.4) months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 100%, 57.1% and 42.9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 8.7 (1.2-44.1) months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year PFS rates were 28.6%. The 1-, 2- and 3-year local control (LC) rates were 100%. No grade ≥4 radiation-induced adverse events (AEs) were observed. We conclude that PBT can be considered an alternative to hepatic resection for recurrent liver metastases postoperative esophageal cancer.

Evaluation of Alisertib Alone or Combined With Fulvestrant in Patients With Endocrine-Resistant Advanced Breast Cancer

Aurora A kinase (AURKA) activation, related in part to AURKA amplification and variants, is associated with downregulation of estrogen receptor (ER) α expression, endocrine resistance, and implicated in cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i) resistance. Alisertib, a selective AURKA inhibitor, upregulates ERα and restores endocrine sensitivity in preclinical metastatic breast cancer (MBC) models. The safety and preliminary efficacy of alisertib was demonstrated in early-phase trials; however, its activity in CDK 4/6i-resistant MBC is unknown. To assess the effect of adding fulvestrant to alisertib on objective tumor response rates (ORRs) in endocrine-resistant MBC. This phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted through the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium, which enrolled participants from July 2017 to November 2019. Postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant, ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative MBC who were previously treated with fulvestrant were eligible. Stratification factors included prior treatment with CDK 4/6i, baseline metastatic tumor ERα level measurement (<10%, ≥10%), and primary or secondary endocrine resistance. Among 114 preregistered patients, 96 (84.2%) registered and 91 (79.8%) were evaluable for the primary end point. Data analysis began after January 10, 2022. Alisertib, 50 mg, oral, daily on days 1 to 3, 8 to 10, and 15 to 17 of a 28-day cycle (arm 1) or alisertib same dose/schedule with standard-dose fulvestrant (arm 2). Improvement in ORR in arm 2 of at least 20% greater than arm 1 when the expected ORR for arm 1 was 20%. All 91 evaluable patients (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [11.3] years; 1 American Indian/Alaskan Native [1.1%], 2 Asian [2.2%], 6 Black/African American [6.6%], 5 Hispanic [5.5%], and 79 [86.8%] White individuals; arm 1, 46 [50.5%]; arm 2, 45 [49.5%]) had received prior treatment with CDK 4/6i. The ORR was 19.6%; (90% CI, 10.6%-31.7%) for arm 1 and 20.0% (90% CI, 10.9%-32.3%) for arm 2. In arm 1, the 24-week clinical benefit rate and median progression-free survival time were 41.3% (90% CI, 29.0%-54.5%) and 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.9-10.0), respectively, and in arm 2 they were 28.9% (90% CI, 18.0%-42.0%) and 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.8), respectively. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events attributed to alisertib were neutropenia (41.8%) and anemia (13.2%). Reasons for discontinuing treatment were disease progression (arm 1, 38 [82.6%]; arm 2, 31 [68.9%]) and toxic effects or refusal (arm 1, 5 [10.9%]; arm 2, 12 [26.7%]). This randomized clinical trial found that adding fulvestrant to treatment with alisertib did not increase ORR or PFS; however, promising clinical activity was observed with alisertib monotherapy among patients with endocrine-resistant and CDK 4/6i-resistant MBC. The overall safety profile was tolerable. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02860000.