Medial Quadriceps Tendon Femoral Ligament Research Articles

Quadriceps Tendon Attachment Technique for Medial Quadriceps Tendon-Femoral Ligament (MQTFL) Reconstruction in the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Patella Dislocation

Medial quadriceps tendon–femoral ligament (MQTFL) reconstruction for prevention of recurrent patella dislocation is an alternative to medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Because the reconstruction graft attaches to the quadriceps tendon, no patella drill hole is required, thereby eliminating iatrogenic fracture risk. The procedure remains anatomically accurate and early results are comparable to MPFL reconstruction for preventing patella dislocation. The MQTFL reconstruction graft is brought up under the vastus medialis obliquus distal to the patella apex, such that its orientation is directed toward the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) midpoint, also known as Tanaka’s point. The graft is then secured by looping it around the vastus medialis and rectus femoris tendons, after which optimal graft length is easily established by cycling the knee, after which it is sutured securely into the deep quadriceps tendon precisely at the anatomic midpoint of the MPFC. Anatomic reconstruction of the MQTFL—in which graft orientation is crucial—confers reliable patellofemoral joint stability in the surgical treatment of patients with recurrent patella dislocations.

Utility of dynamic ultrasound in the assessment of patellar instability (158)

Objectives:Few imaging modalities currently exist that allow for dynamic assessment of the patellofemoral joint. Dynamic evaluation of patellar instability is typically based on physical examination using the Glide test to assess and quantify lateral patellar translation. However, this method can be limited for inexperienced examiners, and precise quantification with this method remains difficult. Therefore, this study aimed to utilize ultrasound imaging to quantify patellar position and translation under dynamic loading conditions to compare knees with and without injury to the medial soft tissue restraints.Methods:10 fresh frozen, unpaired cadaveric knee specimens underwent assessment of lateral patellar translation using a portable ultrasound device. The probe was positioned 1cm above the medial joint line, and measurements were performed based on the distance between the articular edge of the medial patellar facet and the most prominent edge of the medial trochlear facet. Using an electronic force gauge, two standardized loading conditions were created: (1) Unloaded (0N of force), and (2) loaded with 20N of laterally directed force on the patella to mimic the Glide test. Patellar translation in the lateral direction was assessed from 0-40 degrees of knee flexion at 10 degree increments using a hand held goniometer. Measurements were performed in intact knees and were repeated after arthroscopic transection of the medial soft tissue restraints (both medial patellofemoral ligament [MPFL] and medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament [MQTFL]). All measurements were performed using Image J. Paired t-test was used to compare the findings of the intact vs injured states. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative, and positive predictive value for the injury state were determined based on the values from the intact state +2 standard deviations (SD). P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:Compared with the intact state, significant increases in lateralized patellar position and translation were observed when the MPFL and MQTFL were transected, at all flexion angles between 0 and 40 degrees (p values ranging from .005 to <.001). Results are listed in Table 1. The greatest difference was noted with a laterally directed force of 20N at 20 degrees knee flexion, where a 32.8% (6mm) increase in lateral translation was observed in the injured state, when compared to the intact state. Based on 2 SD from normal values at 20 and 30 degrees, the optimal cutoff point to identify MPFL/MQTFL injury was 17.5 mm of distance from the medial trochlea to the medial patellar facet (sensitivity 95.1%; specificity 86.7%; accuracy 90%).Conclusions:Under dynamic ultrasonographic assessment, the integrity of the medial patellar restraints can be effectively evaluated based on measurements of patellar position and translation, with patellar position >17.5mm from the medial trochlea at 20 and 30 degrees knee flexion indicating the presence of injury. As dynamic ultrasound can be performed without radiation or invasive testing in multiple clinical settings, further studies are recommended to assess the utility of ultrasound based assessments in the evaluation and management of patellar instability.

THE EXTENT OF MEDIAL QUADRICEPS TENDON FEMORAL LIGAMENT (MQTFL) PATELLAR AND QUADRICEPS ATTACHMENT: A PEDIATRIC CADAVERIC STUDY

Background:The most common modern procedure for medial patellar stabilization involves reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and involves reconstructed ligament attachment to the femur and patella. However, cases of patellar fracture have been reported, particularly in the smaller anatomy of the pediatric population, leading to further investigations of patella stabilizing structures. The medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament has been identified as a separate structure, connecting the patella to the femur and playing a significant role in patella stability. Reconstruction of this ligament may serve a role in patellar stabilization similar to pedicled quadriceps tendon medial ligamentous reconstructions. The anatomy and relationship of the MQTFL attachment to the quadriceps tendon and proximal pole of the patella has not been described in pediatric specimens.Purpose:To determine the anatomical relationship and attachment of the medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL) on the patella and quadriceps tendon.Methods:Six pediatric cadaveric knee specimens were dissected to identify the patellar and quadriceps attachment site of the MQTFL. Dissection was facilitated by lateral arthrotomy and identification of the MQTFL thickened fibers from the undersurface of the ligament.Results:Six specimens included patients a mean age of 6 years at time of patient death (three 10-year-old specimens, one 4-year-old, and one 2-month-old specimen). The MQTFL was identified in all specimens. As identified from the undersurface of the everted extensor mechanism, it was found to insert a mean distance of 10.5 mm (range 3.9 – 18.2) from the superior pole of the patella. The attachment distally along the edge of the bony patella measured a mean of 12.7 mm (range 5.4-19.4). Total patellar length, as measured from the posterior articular surface, was a mean of 24.5 mm (range 11.0-35.6). Attachment to the quadriceps tendon averaged 47% of total attachment to both the quadriceps tendon and patella; conversely, direct patellar measurement averaged 53%.Conclusion:This study provides quantitative anatomy to attachment of the MQTFL to the patella and quadriceps tendon. Precise knowledge of these structures will assist to more precisely define the complex relationship between stabilizing structures to the medial patellofemoral joint and assist in patella stabilization procedures, particularly in skeletally immature patients. A lower risk of patellar fracture may be one of the key benefits of this procedure, compared with MPFL reconstruction.FIGURESFigure 1:.View from the posterior surface (ie inside joint) following lateral arthrotomy. Note MQTFL attachment point in relation to the proximal extent of the cartilaginous articular surface.ReferencesFulkerson JP, Edgar C. Medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament: Surgical anatomy and reconstruction technique to prevent patella instability. Arthrosc Tech 2013;2:e125- e128.Joseph SM, Fulkerson JP. Medial Quadriceps Tendon Femoral Ligament Reconstruction Technique and Surgical Anatomy. Arthroscopy techniques. 2019 Jan 1;8(1):e57-64.Parikh SN, Wall EJ. Patellar fracture after medial patel- lofemoral ligament surgery: A report of five cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93. e97(1-8)Dhinsa BS, Bhamra JS, James C, Dunnet W, Zahn H. Patella fracture after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using suture anchors. Knee 2013;20:605- 608.Shah JN, Howard JS, Flanigan DC, Brophy RH, Carey JL, Lattermann C. A systematic review of complications and failures associated with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:1916-1923Tanaka MJ. The anatomy of the medial patellofemoral complex. Sports Med Arthrosc 2017;25:e8-e11.Kruckeberg BM, Chahla J, Moatshe G, et al. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the medial patellar ligaments: An anatomic and radiographic study. Am J Sports Med 2017. 363546517729818LaPrade RF, Engebretsen AH, Ly TV, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L. The anatomy of the medial part of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:2000- 2010.Mochizuki T, Nimura A, Tateishi T, Yamaguchi K, Muneta T, Akita K. Anatomic study of the attachment of the medial patellofemoral ligament and its characteristic relationships to the vastus intermedius. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:305-310.Nelitz M, Williams SR. Anatomic reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament in children and adolescents using a pedicled quadriceps tendon graft. Arthroscopy techniques. 2014 Apr 1;3(2):e303-8.

Combined Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Medial Quadriceps Tendon–Femoral Ligament

Most patellar dislocations are associated with disruption of the proximal medial patellar restraints (PMPRs). The PMPRs comprise the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and medial quadriceps tendon–femoral ligament (MQTFL). Although isolated MPFL reconstruction is the most frequently performed procedure for the surgical management of recurrent dislocation, recent studies have shown that the MQTFL has a synergistic role with the MPFL in resisting lateral patellar displacement close to full extension. It has therefore been suggested that surgical techniques that gain the benefits of both proximal and distal PMPR biomechanical behavior may be best. This article describes an established technique for combined MPFL and MQTFL reconstruction using semitendinosus autograft.

Current Concepts Regarding Patellofemoral Trochlear Dysplasia

Optimal treatment of patients with patellofemoral trochlear dysplasia and recurrent patellar instability requires in-depth understanding of this complex structural anomaly. An extensive review of the literature suggests that dysplasia occurs as a result of aberrant forces applied to the patellofemoral joint in the majority of cases. Evidence supports surgical stabilization that reconstructs the medial patellofemoral and/or medial quadriceps tendon–femoral ligament without added trochleoplasty in the majority of patients with trochlear dysplasia and recurrent patellar instability. Adding tibial tubercle transfer distally, medially, or anteromedially in those who need it to treat specific deficits in alignment or articular cartilage can be beneficial in selected patients with trochlear dysplasia and recurrent patellar instability. Trochleoplasty may be appropriate in those few cases in which permanent stable patellofemoral tracking cannot be restored otherwise, but the indications are not yet clear, particularly as trochleoplasty adds risk to the articular cartilage. Improved understanding of imaging techniques and 3-dimensional reproductions of dysplastic patellofemoral joints are useful in surgical planning for patients with recurrent patellar instability and trochlear dysplasia.

Differential anatomy within the femoral origin of the medial patellofemoral complex: Implications or reconstruction

Objectives:The medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) includes the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL). Recent reports have described reconstruction of this fan-shaped ligament to treat patellar instability using a double stranded technique to recreate both components of the complex, with a common origin on the medial femur. Much effort has been placed on accurately identifying the “point” of femoral origin during reconstruction due to the influence of femoral tunnel position on MPFC graft function, however, the MPFC origin is elongated in nature. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe the shape and orientation of the MPFC origin and identify the difference between the most proximal and distal margins of the elongated femoral footprint.Methods:20 paired fresh frozen cadaveric knees were dissected. From an intraarticular approach, the MPFC was exposed and followed to its footprint on the medial femur. All other soft tissue was removed from the distal femur, and the footprint of the MPFC, the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle were marked. Images of the medial femur were analyzed using Image J software. The length and width of the MPFC footprint was described to the nearest 0.1mm, as well as the angle of the long axis of the footprint relative to the axis of the femoral shaft (0.1 degrees). The position of the footprint’s most proximal and distal margins were identified and described in relation to the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle. The positions for each were compared using paired t tests.Results:17 knees from 10 cadavers (7M, 3F, mean age 73.1) were included in this study. The MPFC femoral footprint had a length of 11.7mm+/-1.8mm (Range 9.6,15.7) and a width of 1.7mm+/-0.4mm (Range, 0.9, 2.2). The long axis of the footprint was found to lie at an angle 14.6+/-16.6 degrees anterior to the axis of the femoral shaft. The most proximal fibers originated 7.4mm+/-3.8mm anterior and 1.8mm+/-4.7mm distal to the adductor tubercle, and 4.1mm+/-2.6mm posterior and 8.4mm+/-5.6mm proximal to the medial epicondyle. The most distal fibers originated 4.9mm+/-4.2mm anterior and 1.3mm+/-4.3mm and distal to the adductor tubercle, as well as 7.1mm+/-2.4mm posterior and 0.5mm+/-5.6mm distal to the medial epicondyle. Overall, the distal margin of the footprint was 10.9mm+/-1.7mm distal (p<0.001) and 2.6mm+/-3.2mm more posterior (p=0.005) than the proximal margin of the MPFC origin.Conclusions:The femoral footprint of the MPFC is ribbon shaped, with the distal margin being 10.9 mm distal and 2.6 mm posterior to the proximal margin. This differential anatomy of the femoral origin suggest that MPFL and MQTFL reconstruction may require separate placements of the femoral tunnels to anatomically recreate these fibers. Further biomechanical studies are needed to determine the optimal femoral tunnel placement in the setting of double-limbed MPFC reconstruction, as well as the long term benefit of this technique in the treatment of patellar instability.

Femoral Origin Anatomy of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex: Implications for Reconstruction

To report the shape and orientation of the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) footprint on the medial femur and describe the difference between the proximal (medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament, MQTFL) and distal (medial patellofemoral ligament, MPFL) fibers. In 20 cadaveric knees, the MPFC footprint on the medial femur was exposed. Images of the medial femur were analyzed using ImageJ software. The length and width of theMPFC footprint were described to the nearest 0.1 mm; the angle of its long axis was described relative to the axis of the femoral shaft (0.1°). The footprint's most proximal and distal margins were described in relation to the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle. The differences between each were compared using paired t tests. 17 knees from 10 cadavers were included in this study. The MPFC footprint had a length of 11.7 ± 1.8 mm and a width of 1.7 ± 0.4 mm. The long axis of the footprint was at an angle 14.6° ± 16.6° anterior to the axis of the femoral shaft. The most proximal (MQTFL) fibers originated 7.4 ± 3.8 mm anterior and 1.8 ± 4.7 mm distal to the adductor tubercle and 4.1 ± 2.9 mm posterior and 8.4 ± 5.6 mm proximal to the medial epicondyle. The most distal (MPFL) fibers originated 4.9 ± 4.2 mm anterior and 12.7 ± 4.3 mm distal to the adductor tubercle, as well as 7.1 ± 2.4 mm posterior and 0.5 ± 5.6 mm distal to the medial epicondyle. The distal margin of the femoral MPFC footprint was 10.9 ± 1.7 mm distal (p < .001) and 2.6±3.2 mm more posterior (p= .005) than the proximal margin. The femoral footprint of the MPFC has a length almost 7 times greater than its width, with the distal margin being 10.9 mm distal and 2.6 mm posterior to the proximal margin. This differential anatomy within the femoral origin suggests that MPFL and MQTFL reconstruction may require separate positions of femoral fixation to recreate the anatomy of these fibers.

Comparison of Patellofemoral Kinematics and Stability After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Medial Quadriceps Tendon–Femoral Ligament Reconstruction

Background: There is a lack of evidence regarding the optimum extensor-sided fixation method for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. There is increased interest in avoiding patellar drilling via soft tissue–only fixation to the distal quadriceps, thus reconstructing the medial quadriceps tendon–femoral ligament (MQTFL). The biomechanical implications of differing extensor-sided fixation constructs remain unknown. Hypothesis: The null hypothesis was there would be no differences between traditional MPFL reconstruction and MQTFL reconstruction with respect to resistance to lateral translation, patellar position, or patellofemoral contact pressures. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Nine adult knee specimens were mounted on a jig that applied static, physiologic loads to the quadriceps tendons. Patellar position and orientation, knee flexion angle, and patellofemoral pressure were recorded at 8 different flexion angles between 0° and 110°. Additionally, a lateral patellar excursion test was conducted wherein a load was applied directly to the patella in the lateral direction with the knee at 30° of flexion and subjected to 2-N quadriceps loads. Testing was conducted under 4 conditions: intact, transected MPFL, MQTFL reconstruction, and MPFL reconstruction. For MQTFL reconstruction, the surgical technique established by Fulkerson was employed. For MPFL reconstruction, a traditional technique was utilized. Results: The patellar excursion test showed no significant difference between the MQTFL and intact states with respect to lateral translation. MPFL reconstruction led to significantly less lateral translation (P < .05) than all other states. There were no significant differences between MPFL and MQTFL reconstructions with respect to peak patellofemoral contact pressure. MPFL and MQTFL reconstructions both resulted in increased internal rotation of the patella with the knee in full extension. Conclusion: Soft tissue-only extensor-sided fixation to the distal quadriceps (MQTFL) during patella stabilization appears to re-create native stability in this time 0 cadaver model. Fixation to the patella (MPFL) was associated with increased resistance to lateral translation. Clinical Relevance: Evolving anatomic knowledge and concern for patellar fracture has led to increased interest in MQTFL reconstruction. Both MQTFL and MPFL reconstructions restored patellofemoral stability to lateral translation without increasing contact pressures under appropriate graft tensioning, with MQTFL more closely restoring native resistance to lateral translation at the time of surgery.

Effect of Patella Alta on the Native Anatomometricity of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex: A Cadaveric Study

Background: Patella alta has been identified as an important risk factor for lateral patellar instability and medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) reconstruction failure. Purpose: To evaluate the length changes of the MPFC at multiple possible reconstruction locations along the extensor mechanism in varying degrees of patella alta throughout knee motion. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were used in this study. The MPFC was identified and dissected with the patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon. A custom-made jig was utilized to evaluate lengths from 0° to 90° of flexion with physiological quadriceps loading. Length was measured with a 3-dimensional robotic arm at 4 possible reconstruction locations along the extensor mechanism: the midpoint patella (MP), the MPFC osseous center (FC), the superior medial pole of the patella (SM) at the level of the quadriceps insertion, and 1 cm proximal to the SM point along the quadriceps tendon (QT). These measurements were repeated at 0°, 20°, 40°, 60° and 90° of flexion. Degrees of increasing severity of patella alta at Caton-Deschamps index (CDI) ratios of 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6 were then investigated. Results: Patella alta and MPFC attachment site location significantly affected changes in MPFC length from 0° to 90° of flexion (P< .0005). Length changes at attachment MP showed no difference when CDI 1.0 was compared with all patella alta values (CDI 1.2, 1.4, 1.6; P > .05). Similarly, FC showed no difference in length change from 0° to 90° until CDI 1.6, in contrast to proximal attachments (SM, QT), which demonstrated significant changes at CDI 1.4 and 1.6. When length changes were analyzed at each degree of flexion (0°, 20°, 40°, 60°, 90°), Spearman correlation analysis showed a moderate negative linear correlation for QT at CDI 1.0 (r= −0.484; P = .002) and 1.6 (r = −0.692; P < .0005), demonstrating constant loosening at the QT point at normal and elevated patellar height. In contrast, no differences in length were observed for MP at CDI 1.0 throughout flexion, and at CDI 1.6, there was a difference only at 0° (P < .05). Points FC and MP at CDI 1.6 had similar length change properties to points SM and QT at CDI 1.0 (P > .05), suggesting that distal attachments in the setting of patella alta may provide similar length changes to proximal attachmentswith normal height. Conclusion: Anisometry of the MPFC varies not only with attachment location on the extensor mechanism but also with patellar height. Increased patellar height leads to more significant changes in anisometry in the proximal MPFC attachment point as compared with the distal component. In the setting of patella alta, including a CD ratio of 1.6, the osseous attachments of the MPFC remain nearly isometric wheras the proximal half length changes increase significantly. Clinical Significance: The results of this study support the idea that the MPFC should be considered as 2 separate entities (proximal medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament and distal medial patellofemoral ligament) owing to their unique length change properties.

Differential Contributions of the Quadriceps and Patellar Attachments of the Proximal Medial Patellar Restraints to Resisting Lateral Patellar Translation

To define the contributions of the of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL) to lateral patellar translation as the knee moves through a 90° arc of motion. Six pairs of bilateral cadaveric knee specimens (12 knees) were dissected and potted in perfect lateral position using fluoroscopy. An eye screw was placed in the midpoint on the lateral aspect of the patella. Each knee underwent testing in 4 conditions after sequential sectioning: intact, lateral retinacular release, randomized MQTFL or MPFL sectioning, and complete proximal medial patellar restraint (PMPR) sectioning. With a custom machined jig, all knees were tested at 0, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, and 90° of flexion on an MTS machine with 20N of lateral patellar force applied and displacement recorded. PMPR extensor mechanism insertion on all specimens was identified 50% on the quadriceps tendon and 50% on the proximal aspect of the medial patella. Isolated MPFL sectioning resulted in significantly increased lateral displacement compared to the lateral release state at all flexion angles tested except 0°. There was significantly increased lateral patellar displacement with complete sectioning compared with isolated proximal sectioning at all degrees of knee flexion except 0°. However, complete sectioning following isolated MPFL sectioning did not demonstrate significance at any angle. Compared with the MQTFL, the MPFL is primarily responsible for resistance to lateral patellar translation throughout a 0° to 90° arc of motion. The MPFL provides a similar resistance to lateral patellar displacement as the fully intact PMPR; however, the MQTFL may contribute to resistance in full extension. Proximal medial patellar restraint reconstruction techniques involving both the patellar and quadriceps insertion have been described; however, the unique contributions of the native anatomy to lateral patellar restraint have not been investigated.

An Updated Overview of the Anatomy and Function of the Proximal Medial Patellar Restraints (Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and the Medial Quadriceps Tendon Femoral Ligament).

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has been widely accepted to function as "the primary static restraint to lateral patellar displacement." However, current growing evidence suggests that there is a complex of medial patellofemoral/tibial ligaments, both proximal [MPFL, and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL)], and distal (medial patellotibial ligament and the medial patellomeniscal ligament) which restrain lateral patellar translation at different degrees of knee flexion. Specifically, the MQTFL has gained popularity over the last decade because of pure soft tissue attachments into the extensor mechanism that allow for avoidance of drilling tunnels into the patella during reconstruction. The purpose of this article was to report on the current knowledge (anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, indications for surgery, and techniques) on the proximal medial patellar restraints, namely the MPFL and the MQTFL, collectively referred to as the proximal medial patellar restraints.

Concepts of the Distal Medial Patellar Restraints: Medial Patellotibial Ligament and Medial Patellomeniscal Ligament.

The important medial patellar ligamentous restraints to lateral dislocation are the proximal group (the medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament and the medial patellofemoral ligament) and the distal group [medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) and medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML)]. The MPTL patellar insertion is at inferomedial border of patella and tibial insertion is in the anteromedial tibia. The MPML originates in the inferomedial patella, right proximal to the MPTL, inserting in the medial meniscus. On the basis of anatomy and biomechanical studies, the MPTL and MPML are more important in 2 moments during knee range of motion: terminal extension, when it directly counteracts quadriceps contraction. In a systematic review on MPTL reconstructions 19 articles were included detailing the clinical outcomes of 403 knees. All were case series. Overall, good and excellent outcomes were achieved in >75% of cohorts in most studies and redislocations were <10%, with or without the association of the medial patellofemoral ligament. The MPTL is a relevant additional tool to proximal restraint reconstruction in select patient profiles; however, more definitive clinical studies are necessary to better define surgical indications.

Evaluation of Patellar Contact Pressure Changes after Static versus Dynamic Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstructions Using a Finite Element Model

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of various medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) fixation techniques on patellar pressure compared with the native knee. Methods: A finite element model of the patellofemoral joint consisting of approximately 30,700 nodes and 22,200 elements was created from computed tomography scans of 24 knees with chronic lateral patellar instability. Patellar contact pressures and maximum MPFL graft stress at five positions of flexion (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°) were analyzed in three types of MPFL reconstruction (MPFLr): (1) static/anatomic, (2) dynamic, using the adductor magnus tendon (AMT) as the femoral fixation, and (3) dynamic, using the quadriceps tendon as the attachment (medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament (MQTFL) reconstruction). Results: In the static/anatomic technique, the patellar contact pressures at 0° and 30° were greater than in the native knee. As in a native knee, the contact pressures at 60°, 90°, and 120° were very low. The maximum MPFL graft stress at 0° and 30° was greater than in a native knee. However, the MPFL graft was loose at 60°, 90°, and 120°, meaning it had no tension. In the dynamic MPFLr using the AMT as a pulley, the patellar contact pressures were like those of a native knee throughout the entire range of motion. However, the maximum stress of the MPFL graft at 0° was less than that of a native ligament. Yet, the maximum MPFL graft stress was greater at 30° than in a native ligament. After 30° of flexion, the MPFL graft loosened, similarly to a native knee. In the dynamic MQTFL reconstruction, the maximum patellar contact pressure was slightly greater than in a normal knee. The maximum stress of the MPFL graft was much greater at 0° and 30° than that of a native MPFL. After 30° of flexion, the MQPFL graft loosened just as in the native knee. Conclusions: The patellar contact pressures after the dynamic MPFLr were like those of the native knee, whereas a static reconstruction resulted in greater pressures, potentially increasing the risk of patellofemoral osteoarthritis in the long term. Therefore, the dynamic MPFLr might be a safer option than a static reconstruction from a biomechanical perspective.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes

The medial patellofemoral ligament is the primary static restraint to lateral patellar translation. It is injured in 96% to 100% of patellar dislocations that affect approximately 6 to 29 of 100,000 patients and is more common in patients younger than 20 years of age. Risk factors for patellar dislocation include patella alta, trochlear dysplasia, genu valgus, increased Q angle, and hyperlaxity. The treatment for patellar instability depends on the clinical and radiographic findings and can be nonoperative for first-time dislocations (bracing, proximal strengthening, and progressive return to sport) or operative for recurrent dislocations. It is critical for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction to reproduce the anatomy and isometry of the native ligament. Graft choice and methods of fixation are less critical to achieve successful outcomes. Studies have reported successful outcomes and improved Kujala scores, with recurrent instability ranging from 1% to 5%. Careful surgical technique can avoid complications, including fracture, graft failure, loss of range of motion, persistent anterior knee pain, medial instability, and recurrent instability. The role of the medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament also should be considered more in future research.

Medial Quadriceps Tendon-Femoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Technique Description and Short-Term Outcomes

Purpose: The medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament (MQTFL) is a distinct structure extending from the distal adductor tubercle to quadriceps tendon and provides medial support. Anatomic reconstruction is an alternative to transosseous medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability that eliminates concern for patellar fracture. The purpose of this study is to describe a modified surgical technique for the treatment of patellar instability and evaluate short-term outcomes. Methods: Modified MQTFL reconstructions were performed between April 2012 and November 2015 for persistent patellar instability for which nonoperative treatment had failed. Included patients had &gt;2+ quadrants of laxity and history of recurrent patellar dislocation. Patients with concurrent injuries, Dejour C or D trochlear dysplasia, or who required a realignment osteotomy were excluded. Anatomic reconstruction of the MQTFL was performed utilizing a sling in the distal medial quadriceps tendon and doubling the graft back to the femoral isometric point. Clinical outcomes were documented via a telephone survey. Physical examination findings were obtained by chart review at 3 to 6 months postoperative. Results: Thirteen modified MQTFL reconstructions were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 29 months. At follow-up, all patients had achieved a full range of motion and 1 to 2 quadrants of passive lateral glide with a good endpoint. There were no recurrent dislocations or complications directly related to the surgery. Overall satisfaction rate was 98%. Median Tegner preinjury and postoperative were 7; 67% returned to sports at the same level. Mean Lysholm and Kujala scores were 97 (SD=4). Conclusion: Modified MQTFL reconstruction is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of patellar instability. This procedure is a valuable technique for avoiding potential patellar fracture associated with transosseous medial patellofemoral ligament fixation. Level of Evidence: Level IV—case series.

Combined Soft Tissue Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Medial Quadriceps Tendon–Femoral Ligament

Patellar dislocation is a major orthopaedic concern in pediatric and adult populations, with both conservative and surgical options available. Several surgical techniques of the combined or isolated reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament are described in the literature using different grafts, locations, and types of fixations, providing different advantages and disadvantages. New recent developments in cadaveric dissection studies have unveiled the importance of structures that were neglected until recently, such as the medial quadriceps tendon–femoral ligament, which provides a connection between the medial femur and the quadriceps tendon component of the knee extensor mechanism. Hence, we present a surgical technique with combined reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament and medial quadriceps tendon–femoral ligament without the use of hardware and with no need for patellar or femoral drilling (no physis compromise or risk of patellar fracture), which can be used concomitantly with other bony procedures.

Combined Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) and Medial Quadriceps Tendon-Femoral Ligament (MQTFL) for Patellar Instability in Children and Adolescents: Surgical Technique and Outcomes.

A variety of surgical options exist to treat the challenging problem of recurrent patellar instability in children and adolescents. The goal of the current study is to describe a novel combined reconstruction technique of both the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and the medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament (MQTFL) and report patient outcomes of a single-surgeon series. All patients studied underwent simultaneous MPFL and MQTFL reconstruction for patellar instability using gracilis allograft. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were collected. Subjective outcomes were assessed for a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Twenty-five patients (27 knees), including 15 female and 10 male individuals with an average age of 15.0±2.2 years (range, 10.3 to 18.9), were included. Prior ipsilateral patellofemoral surgery had been performed in 6 of 25 (24%) patients. Simultaneous hemiepiphysiodesis for valgus deformity at the time of combined reconstruction was performed in 5 of 25 (20%) patients. Preoperative imaging showed a mean tibial tubercle-trochlear groove of 17.2±3.8, Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI) of 1.13±0.16, and trochlear dysplasia Dejour A/B [22/26 (85%)] or Dejour C/D [4/26 (15%)]. A total of 18 patients (19 knees, 72%) returned outcomes questionnaires at a mean 2.0±0.5 years after surgery. Mean Kujala, Pedi-IKDC, and Lysholm scores were 85.9±13.9, 81.5±15.2, and 84.3±13.5, respectively. Later revision procedure (tibial tubercle osteotomy) for recurrent patellar instability was required in 2 of 25 patients (8%) patients, and another patient reported persistent instability not requiring revision. Return to sports was possible in 10 of 13 self-reported athletes (77%) at a mean of 5.8±3.9 months (range, 2 to 15). The present study describes a combined MPFL-MQTFL reconstruction technique with favorable short-term results. Although particularly useful in the skeletally immature patient where tibial tubercle osteotomy should be avoided and patellar fixation minimized, combined reconstruction may potentially be appropriate for older patients with patellofemoral instability as well. This technique more closely recreates the native anatomy of both the MPFL and MQTFL, may decrease the risk of patellar fracture, and can be useful in the revision setting. Level IV.

Medial Quadriceps Tendon Femoral Ligament Reconstruction Technique and Surgical Anatomy

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction risks patellar fracture with the osseous violation necessary for patellar attachment. Anatomic studies identify an entire medial patellofemoral complex of structures responsible for medial restraint to patellar lateral instability. One specific component of this complex is the medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL). This note presents the technique, pearls and pitfalls, and critical surgical anatomy necessary for successful MQTFL reconstruction—a treatment strategy for patellar instability with no increased risk for patellar fracture. An autograft hamstring tendon or allograft tendon is fixed to the anatomically identified femoral origin and passed deep to the vastus medialis obliquus to then weave around the distal medial quadriceps tendon. This simulates the native anatomic interdigitation of the MQTFL with the quadriceps tendon and provides a stable restraint to prevent lateral patellar subluxation or dislocation.

Recognition of evolving medial patellofemoral anatomy provides insight for reconstruction

The scientific literature concerning the anatomy of medial soft-tissue stabilizers of the patella is growing exponentially. Much of the surgical literature has focused on the role of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and techniques to reconstruct it, yet our understanding of its anatomy has evolved during the past several years. Given this, we report on the current understanding of medial patellofemoral anatomy and implications for reconstruction. Current and historical studies of medial patellar anatomy were reviewed, which include the MPFL and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL), as well as that of the distal medial patellar restraints, the medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) and medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML). In addition to the reported findings, the authors' anatomic descriptions of each ligament during their dissections were identified and recorded. Despite the name of the MPFL, which implies that the ligament courses between the femur and patella, recent studies have highlighted the proximal MPFL fibers that attach to the quadriceps tendon, known as the MQTFL. The MPFL and MQTFL have also been referred to as the medial patellofemoral complex, reflecting the variability in anatomical attachment sites. The MPFL accounts for only half of the total restraint to lateral patellar displacement, and the remaining contributions to patellar stability are derived from the combination of the MPTL and MPML, which function primarily in greater degrees of knee flexion. The understanding of the complexity of the medial patellar stabilizers continues to evolve. Although MPFL reconstruction is gaining wide acceptance as a procedure to treat patellar instability, it is important to recognize the complex and changing understanding of the anatomy of the medial soft-tissue stabilizers and the implications for reconstruction. V.

Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of the Medial Patellar Ligaments: An Anatomic and Radiographic Study

Background: The qualitative and quantitative anatomy of the medial patellar stabilizers has been reported; however, a quantitative analysis of the anatomic and radiographic attachments of all 4 ligaments relative to anatomic and osseous landmarks, as well as to one another, has yet to be performed. Purpose: To perform a qualitative and quantitative anatomic and radiographic evaluation of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL), medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML), and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL) attachment sites, with attention to their relationship to pertinent osseous and soft tissue landmarks. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Ten nonpaired fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were dissected, and the MPFL, MPTL, MPML, and MQTFL were identified. A coordinate measuring device quantified the attachment areas of each structure and its relationship to pertinent bony landmarks. Radiographic analysis was performed through ligament attachment sites and relevant anatomic structures to assess their locations relative to pertinent bony landmarks. Results: Four separate medial patellar ligaments were identified in all specimens. The center of the MPFL attachments was 14.3 mm proximal and 2.1 mm posterior to the medial epicondyle and 8.3 mm distal and 2.7 mm anterior to the adductor tubercle on the femur and 8.9 mm distal and 19.9 mm medial to the superior pole on the patella. The MQTFL had a mean insertion length of 29.3 mm on the medial aspect of the distal quadriceps tendon. The MPTL and MPML shared a common patellar insertion and were 9.1 mm proximal and 15.4 mm medial to the inferior pole. The MPTL attachment inserted on a newly identified bony ridge, which was located 5.0 mm distal to the joint line. The orientation angles of the MPTL and MPML with respect to the patellar tendon were 8.3° and 22.7°, respectively. Conclusion: The most important findings of this study were the correlative anatomy of 4 distinct medial patellar ligaments (MPFL, MPTL, MPML, MQTFL), as well as the identification of a bony ridge on the medial proximal tibia that consistently served as the attachment site for the MPTL. The quantitative and radiographic measurements, while comparable with current literature, detailed the meniscal insertion of the MPML and defined a patellar insertion of the MPTL and the MPML as a single attachment. The data allow for reproducible landmarks to be established from previously known bony and soft tissue structures. Clinical Relevance: The findings of this study provide the anatomic foundation needed for an improved understanding of the role of medial-sided patellar restraints. This will help to further refine injury patterns and/or soft tissue deficiencies that result in lateral patellar instability, which can then be addressed with an anatomic-based reconstruction or repair technique and potentially lead to improved outcomes.