Medial Epicondylectomy Research Articles

Effect of Partial, Distal Epicondylectomy on Reduction of Ulnar Nerve Strain: A Cadaver Study

To compare the decrease in ulnar nerve strains using a modification of medial epicondylectomy by removing the distal half of the medial epicondyle with in situ decompression and partial medial epicondylectomy. Using 20 elbows of 10 fresh human cadavers, we measured the strain on the ulnar nerve using a microstrain gauge before and after in situ decompression. Then, we repeated the measurements after partial medial epicondylectomy on left elbows, and after distal medial epicondylectomy on right elbows. We compared the mean strain values with 2-way analysis of variance. The decrease in mean ulnar nerve strain with in situ decompression from 5.4% to 5.2% on the right side and 5.4% to 5.0% on the left was not statistically significant. The decrease to 2.9% on the left elbows after partial and to 1.9% on the right elbows after distal medial epicondylectomy was statistically significant. In addition, the remaining ulnar nerve strain after distal medial epicondylectomy was significantly less compared with that after partial medial epicondylectomy. We observed nerve subluxation only with partial medial epicondylectomy. In situ decompression alone does not change ulnar nerve strains. The significant change in ulnar nerve strain with partial or distal medial epicondylectomy underlines the role of medial epicondyle on stretching of the ulnar nerve. Excision of the distal half of the medial epicondyle sets the contact point of the nerve with the bone proximally and decreases the strain on ulnar nerve more effectively than partial epicondylectomy. However, its efficacy and complications need to be studied clinically. The results of the present cadaveric study suggest that excision of the distal half of the medial epicondyle in cubital tunnel syndrome may decrease ulnar nerve strain effectively. The clinical effect of decrease in nerve strain and the indications for the procedure need to be investigated.

Outcomes Following Modified Oblique Medial Epicondylectomy for Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

To quantify and define objective and patient-rated outcomes after our modification of medial epicondylectomy for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Although medial epicondylectomy has been previously studied, data are lacking regarding elbow-specific outcomes after our technique that aims to minimize complications historically associated with medical epicondylectomy. A total of 27 subjects with clinical and electrodiagnostic evidence of cubital tunnel syndrome underwent a modified oblique medial epicondylectomy that was designed to minimize bony resection and preserve the origin of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow. Average age was 57 years, mean duration of symptoms was 24 months, and mean postoperative follow-up was 29 months. Eight patients had McGowan stage I disease, 14 had stage II, and 5 had stage III. Preoperatively, we measured intrinsic hand strength, 2-point discrimination, and residual medial elbow pain, and assessed for continuing signs and symptoms of nerve compression. Postoperatively, we added to the clinical examination elbow stability testing, elbow range of motion, and assessment of medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury. We collected patient-reported outcomes, including Quick Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand; Levine-Katz Severity Score; and Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation. We noted improvement of at least 1 McGowan grade in 20 of 27 patients (74%). Three of the 7 patients who had no change in McGowan grade still reported excellent patient-rated outcomes. Good to excellent results were achieved in 25 of 27 patients (93%). One patient had long-term severe medial elbow pain. Three patients had postoperative medial elbow pain that resolved with a single corticosteroid injection. One patient had a 30° flexion contracture; preoperative motion was not available for comparison. No patients had signs of elbow instability or numbness in the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve distribution. Modified oblique medial epicondylectomy was effective in improving symptoms in cubital tunnel syndrome. This medial collateral ligament sparing technique minimized complications previously associated with the original technique. Therapeutic IV.

Distal medial epicondylectomy. A modification of partial medial epicondylectomy for cubital tunnel syndrome: preliminary results

The medial epicondyle behaves as a fulcrum and a pulley that tethers the ulnar nerve during flexion. Excision of the distal half of the medial epicondyle sets the point of contact of the bone with the nerve proximally and decreases the traction effect of the medial epicondyle on the ulnar nerve. In this study, we aim to investigate the surgical and clinical results of excision of the distal half of the medial epicondyle in cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). Cubital tunnel release with excision of the distal half of the medial epicondyle was performed in 19 patients. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with clinical examinations, McGowan and Wilson-Krout scores, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament and two-point discrimination tests, and grip and pinch strength measurements. A one-grade improvement in McGowan classification was observed in 79 % of patients and a two-grade improvement in 21 % of patients at the time of the first postoperative examination. At 24 months after surgery, 18 patients reported the Wilson-Krout scores as excellent (95 %). Statistically significant improvements in sensory and motor strength measurements were achieved at all postoperative examinations. The objective and subjective outcome measures achieved with distal medial epicondylectomy are comparable with other epicondylectomy techniques. The complication rates seem to be lower than those of total or partial medial epicondylectomy. This procedure is an acceptable and safe alternative for the surgical treatment of CuTS.

Treatment of Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow: Cost–Utility Analysis

The choice of surgical treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) remains controversial. A cost-utility analysis was performed for 4 surgical UNE treatment options. We hypothesized that simple decompression would emerge as the most cost-effective strategy. A cost-utility analysis was performed from the societal perspective. A decision analytic model was designed comparing 4 strategies: (1) simple decompression followed by a salvage surgery (anterior submuscular transposition) for a poor outcome, (2) anterior subcutaneous transposition followed by a salvage surgery for a poor outcome, (3) medial epicondylectomy followed by a salvage surgery for a poor outcome, and (4) anterior submuscular transposition. A poor outcome when anterior submuscular transposition was the initial surgery was considered an end point in the model. Preference values for temporary health states for UNE, the surgical procedures, and the complications were obtained through a time trade-off survey administered to family members and friends who accompanied patients to physician visits. Probabilities of clinical outcomes were derived from a Cochrane Collaboration meta-analysis and a systematic MEDLINE and EMBASE search of the literature. Medical care costs (in 2009 U.S. dollars) were derived from Medicare reimbursement rates. The model estimated quality-adjusted life-years and costs for a 3-year time horizon. A 3% annual discount rate was applied to costs and quality-adjusted life-years. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated, and sensitivity analyses performed. Simple decompression as an initial procedure was the most cost-effective treatment strategy. A multi-way sensitivity analysis varying the preference values for the surgeries and a model structure sensitivity analysis varying the model assumptions did not change the conclusion. Under all evaluated scenarios, simple decompression yielded incremental cost-effectiveness ratios less than US$2,027 per quality-adjusted life-year. Simple decompression as an initial treatment option is cost-effective for UNE according to commonly used cost-effectiveness thresholds. Economic and Decision Analysis III.

Minimal Epicondylectomy Improves Neurologic Deficits in Moderate to Severe Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Previous studies of minimal medial epicondylectomy for cubital tunnel syndrome included patients with mild disease, making it difficult to determine how much this procedure improved sensory and motor impairments in patients with moderate to severe disease. We asked if minimal epicondylectomy improved sensory and motor impairments in patients with moderate to severe cubital tunnel syndrome. We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients treated with minimal medial epicondylectomy for advanced cubital tunnel syndrome involving motor weakness between January 2003 and February 2009. Preoperatively, five patients had Medical Research Council (MRC) Grade 4 motor strength without atrophy (McGowan Grade IIA), nine had MRC Grade 3 motor strength with detectable atrophy (McGowan Grade IIB), and 11 had MRC Grade 3 or less motor strength with severe atrophy (McGowan Grade III). Postoperatively we obtained DASH scores and evaluated improvement of sensory impairment and motor impairment: excellent with minimal sensory deficit and motor deficit, good with mild deficits, fair with improved but persistent deficit(s), and poor with no improvement. The minimum followup was 13 months (mean, 46 months; range, 13-86 months). The mean DASH score was 14 points (range, 2-47 points). Of the 25 patients, sensory improvement and motor improvement were excellent in 16 patients, good in five, fair in two, and poor in two. Twenty-three of the 25 patients improved at least one McGowan grade. There were no complications, such as medial elbow instability. Minimal medial epicondylectomy can improve sensory and motor impairments for patients with moderate to severe cubital tunnel syndrome. Level IV, therapeutic study. See the guidelines for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition Versus Decompression and Medial Epicondylectomy for the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition Versus Decompression and Medial Epicondylectomy for the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Evaluation of Functional Outcome after Surgery for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Objectives: Surgical outcome of the patients undergoing decompression and minimal medial epicondylectomy were retrospectively evaluated. Methods: 16 patients who underwent decompression and minimal medial epicondylectomy for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome (CTS) were retrospectively evaluated. 11 female (68.75%) and 5 male (31.25%) patients suffering from unilateral CTS that is unresponsive to conservative treatment were included to the study. Average age was 39.18±14.36 years. Left side involvement occurred in 12 patients (75%), while right side involvement occurred in 4 patients (%25). McGowan classification of ulnar nerve injury was used for the surgical grading. Grade 1 in four patients (25%), grade 2 in 11 patients (68.75%), and grade 3 in 1 patient (6.25%). Cervical disc herniation, thoracic outlet syndrome and other entrapment neuropathies were ruled out preoperatively. Results of surgical treatment were evaluated according to Wilson–Krout criteria. Patients were followed during 18 – 64 months in average. Findings: Symptomatic relief was achieved in all of the patients. Postoperative controls in the 1st, 6th and 12th months revealed excellent results for 12 patients (75%), good results for 3 patients (18.75%), and a medium result for 1 patient (6.25%). No patient experienced ulnar nerve paralysis, medial elbow instability and impairment in the pronator – flexor muscle group in the postoperative period. Pain and sensitivity in the osteotomy site of 3 patients (75%) who underwent minimal medial epicondylectomy disappeared three months later. Results: Minimal medial epicondylectomy and decompression are reliable and effective methods for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome with less complication rates.

Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition Versus Decompression and Medial Epicondylectomy for the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

A review of the literature often fails to uncover the best procedure for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. This article compares 2 frequently used methods (subcutaneous anterior transposition vs decompression and medial epicondylectomy) for their effectiveness in relieving both subjective and objective symptoms of cubital tunnel syndrome. Between August 1991 and October 1993, nineteen patients underwent surgical decompression by a single surgeon for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Factors evaluated included upper extremity range of motion, elbow valgus stress, grip strength, pinch, 2-point discrimination, and pre- and postoperative nerve conduction. A standardized questionnaire was administered to assess subjective relief of symptoms.In the transposition group, grip strength averaged 71.2% of normal and pinch strength 86.6% of normal, and 2-point discrimination averaged 8.0 mm. The derived subjective assessment score was 23.2 of a possible 40. The average ulnar motor conduction velocity across the elbow was 50.1 m/sec preoperatively and 56.3 m/sec postoperatively. In the medial epicondylectomy group, grip strength averaged 79.5% of normal and pinch strength 81.7% of normal, and 2-point discrimination averaged 8.0 mm. The average ulnar motor conduction velocity across the elbow was 45.7 m/sec preoperatively and 55.7 m/sec postoperatively. No statistically significant difference existed between the 2 groups for the aforementioned indexes. These results do not indicate a difference between the outcomes of the patients undergoing either of the procedures. Because epicondylectomy is less technically demanding, with less soft tissue dissection of the nerve, it may be preferred over ulnar transposition.

Radial Nerve Disruption Following Application of a Hinged Elbow External Fixator

A hinged or articulated elbow external fixator is recommended for patients with elbow instability1, as a protective device following extensive capsular release of elbow contractures2, after ligamentous reconstruction3, for distraction interposition arthroplasty4, and in the management of complex elbow fracture-dislocations5. The hinged external fixator permits early postoperative elbow mobilization while maintaining elbow stability. There is a growing recognition of the value of and indications for articulated external fixation of the elbow6, despite the possibility of serious complications. Cheung et al.6 classified complications related to hinged external fixators of the elbow as major and minor. Minor complications, which occurred in 15% of patients, included local erythema and nonpurulent pin-site drainage lasting longer than five days and the need for skin release to decrease tension adjacent to the pins. Major complications, which occurred in 10% of patients, included purulent pin-site drainage, fixator malalignment, pin loosening, and deep infection. Although cases of transient radial nerve palsy are described in the literature1,7, to the best of our knowledge no permanent radial nerve palsy has been documented following application of a hinged external fixator. We present three cases of radial nerve palsy due to complete nerve disruption after application of a hinged external fixator for the treatment of complex elbow injuries. The patients were informed that data concerning their cases would be submitted for publication, and they consented. Case 1. A forty-seven-year-old male gardener fell on the right, dominant arm. No fracture or dislocation was noted. Seven years later, ulnar nerve decompression with a medial epicondylectomy was performed elsewhere (i.e., not at our hospital) to treat posttraumatic irritation of the ulnar nerve. Because the symptoms persisted postoperatively, the patient was seen by an elbow specialist at another …

Subjective outcome, neurophysiological investigations, postoperative complications and recurrence rate of partial medial epicondylectomy in cubital tunnel syndrome

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcome with subjective and neurophysiological parameters following partial medial epicondylectomy (pME) and to evaluate complications and recurrence rates. A retrospective analysis was performed in 29 patients (18 males and 11 females) with cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) who underwent pME. Mean time follow-up was 41.4months. For subjective parameters, DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand), a self-created questionnaire about postoperative satisfaction and a visual pain scale (VAS) have been used. All patients were classified according to the Mc Gowan Classification (McG) and Wilson & Krout Classification (WKC). The patients were examined by nerve conduction velocity. Total mean of the DASH score was 24.8 points. In a questionnaire with integrated pain score (1-5), 96% of the patients declared a postoperative improvement, whereas 41.4% patients of the latter group were very contented with the results, 37.9% were contented, 17.2% were less contented and 3.4% were discontented. The VAS for evaluation of postoperative pain showed an average of 2.36 (0-5.9) out of 10. Of the patients, 68.0% were classified as grade I according to McG and 68.0% as excellent or good according to WKC. Motor nerve conduction velocity improved from 34.8m/s preoperatively to 48.2m/s postoperatively. One patient developed a haematoma and three patients (10.3%) had to be classified as recurrence. High postoperative rates of patient satisfaction and improved neurophysiological results could be achieved by pME.

Objective outcome of partial medial epicondylectomy in cubital tunnel syndrome

Goal of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcome in cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) after partial medial epicondylectomy (pME) with objective parameters. A retrospective analysis was performed in 29 (18 male/11 female) patients with CuTS who underwent pME. Mean time follow-up was 41.4 months. Parameters assessed sensibility (two point discrimination (2PD) and Semmes Weinstein Monofilaments (SW)) of the fifth finger and grip and pinch strength. In addition, elbow range of motion, elbow instability, medial elbow pain, Froment sign and Tinel`s sign were evaluated. Postoperative static 2PD of the fifth finger was 12.6 mm. SW values on the operated side (mean 3.58; 2.44-6.65) were comparable to the non-operated side (mean 3.28; 2.44-4.93). Tinel's sign over the ulnar sulcus was positive in 13 cases preoperative and in 16 cases postoperatively. Range of motion of the elbow joint achieved normal values in flexion/extension and pronation/supination with no significant difference in comparison to the non-operated side. Froment sign was positive in 2 cases, negative in 23 cases. Grip strength averaged 48.1 kg in man versus 24.4 kg in women. Pinch strength was 8.6 versus 5.3 kg. Grip strength on the operated side reached up to 91.0% values of the opposite arm. Good postoperative objective results were reached by pME. pME is an adequate treatment option in CuTS.

Vein wrapping at cubital tunnel for ulnar nerve problems

Recurrent compression of the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel is a difficult problem and many solutions have been tried with variable success. Autologous vein graft wrapping is an alternative technique and it is recommended for the treatment of recalcitrant ulnar nerve compression in which 2 or more previous surgical procedures have failed to resolve the problem. Seventeen patients with recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome were treated with autologous saphenous vein wrapping. These patients had previously undergone simple decompression, decompression combined with medial epicondylectomy, anterior submuscular, or intramuscular transposition with internal neurolysis and had persistence of symptoms. Each patient underwent both subjective and objective evaluation. Our clinical results on 17 patients have been encouraging. All patients reported significant pain relief, while improvements in grip strength and 2-point discrimination were also observed. There were no complications, other than transient leg swelling secondary to harvesting the saphenous vein graft from the leg. This technique is not technically demanding, has low donor site morbidity, and leads to pain relief and high patient satisfaction.

Comparative study of surgical treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow

The optimal surgical treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome remains unclear. We aim to evaluate the long-term outcome of surgical treatment by comparing the results of the different methods proposed. We retrospectively reviewed 113 patients in whom 3 different surgical methods were used for cubital tunnel syndrome treatment. In situ decompression, partial epicondylectomy, and anterior subcutaneous transposition were performed from 1997 to 2007. Results were graded as excellent in 51 patients (45%), good in 34 (30%), fair in 8 (7%), and poor in 20 (18%). When we compared the results among the different surgical procedures, good and excellent results were achieved in 26 of 31 patients (84%) treated with in situ decompression, 36 of 45 (80%) treated with release and partial medial epicondylectomy, and 23 of 37 (62%) treated with release and anterior subcutaneous transposition of the nerve. Our results indicate that in situ decompression and partial epicondylectomy both represent efficient and safe methods for cubital tunnel syndrome management. In patients in whom anterior subcutaneous transposition was performed, although they had a significant improvement of their clinical signs and symptoms, they had an inferior outcome when compared with patients treated with the other 2 methods.

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common compression neuropathy in the upper extremity. Patients complain of numbness in the ring and small fingers, as well as hand weakness. Advanced disease is complicated by irreversible muscle atrophy and hand contractures. Ulnar nerve decompression can help to alleviate symptoms and prevent more advanced stages of dysfunction. Many surgical treatments exist for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. In situ decompression, transposition of the ulnar nerve into the subcutaneous, intramuscular, or submuscular plane, or medial epicondylectomy have all been shown to be affective in the treatment of this disease process. Comparative studies have shown some short-term advantages to one or another technique, but overall results between the treatments have essentially been equivocal. The choice of surgical treatment is based on multiple factors, and a single surgical approach cannot be applied to all clinical situations. Through careful consideration of the potential sites of nerve compression and the etiologies for these local irritations, the appropriate surgical technique can be selected and a good outcome anticipated in most patients.

Decompression of the ulnar nerve and minimal medial epicondylectomy with a small incision for cubital tunnel syndrome: Comparison with anterior subcutaneous transposition of the nerve

The objective of this study is to compare the results of ulnar nerve decompression and minimal medial epicondylectomy with a small incision (group I) and anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve (group II) for cubital tunnel syndrome. Out of 56 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome, 29 were in group I and 27 were in group II. The mean age at the time of the operation was 48.9 years, and the mean follow-up period was 36.4 months. Preoperatively, the neuropathy was graded according to Dellon's criteria. There were no significant differences between the results of the two groups according to the modified Bishop's system at the last follow-up. However, four patients showed painful neuroma around the operation scar and one patient in group II had experienced acute deterioration of the symptoms after the procedure. Decompression and minimal medial epicondylectomy with a small incision seems to be more recommendable than anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome in terms of its simplicity and lesser invasiveness.

Outcomes Measures Used to Assess Results After Surgery for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature

The primary objective of this systematic review was to identify and analyze the outcomes measures that have been used to evaluate postoperative results following surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome. The secondary objective was to compare the postoperative results among patients evaluated using patient-satisfaction instruments to those evaluated using surgeon-reported scales. Computerized database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and MEDLINE In-Process were performed. Studies involving adults with cubital tunnel syndrome in whom the surgical intervention was simple decompression, anterior transposition (subcutaneous, submuscular or intramuscular), endoscopic decompression, or medial epicondylectomy were included. A systematic review was performed that included randomized controlled trials, comparative observational studies, noncomparative observational studies, and case series. This systematic review of the literature identified 42 studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria. The authors identified 21 health outcomes measures used in cubital tunnel studies. These consisted of 2 generic instruments; 10 symptom-specific, author-reported instruments; 3 symptom-specific, patient-reported instruments; and 6 patient questionnaires. No measure demonstrated adequate development or validation for use in its target population. Available data revealed a consistently high level of patient satisfaction following simple decompression or submuscular transposition (65% to 92%). The results of the author-reported, symptom-specific scales varied widely and showed no obvious association with patient satisfaction. The variation in reporting of results prevented statistical comparisons between author-reported results and patient-reported results. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to delineate the outcomes measures used to evaluate the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Our results show that reliable, reproducible, and valid outcomes measures are lacking from the surgical literature. A standardized assessment protocol for ulnar neuropathy is required for future comparison trials. Therapeutic III.

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome-Surgical Treatment Techniques

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common nerve compression in the upper extremity after carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). There are multiple surgical options to treat cubital tunnel syndrome with no one treatment proving superior. The options include in situ decompression with or without medial epicondylectomy, endoscopic decompression, and subcutaneous, intramuscular, or submuscular transposition. The surgical techniques as well as specific pearls and pitfalls, relevant anatomy, diagnosis, and conservative treatment will be reviewed.

Endoscopically Assisted Ulnar Neurolysis for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Controversy remains regarding the surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Similar outcomes with ulnar nerve transposition, both subcutaneous and submuscular, and simple decompression have recently been reported. We describe an endoscopically assisted cubital tunnel release through a 2-cm incision using readily available standard equipment. Seventeen of 21 procedures successfully alleviated symptoms of cubital tunnel syndrome in these patients. Four patients who developed ulnar nerve subluxation intraoperatively who were treated with medial epicondylectomy failed to experience relief of symptoms and were successfully treated with anterior submuscular transposition. Patients with more profound motor weakness and/or electrodiagnostic studies had less complete relief of symptoms.

Tratamento da síndrome do túnel ulnar pela técnica da epicondilectomia parcial medial do cotovelo

OBJECTIVE: The authors made a retrospective analysis of the results of 21 cases of cubital syndrome that were surgically treated with the partial medial epicondylectomy. METHODS: From February 2001 to October 2006, 21 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome were treated with the technique of elbow partial medial epicondylectomy associated to neurolysis of the ulnar nerve. Of these patients, 12 (57.1%) were male. The right side was involved in 15 (71.4%). Mean age of the patients was 51.6 years. According to McGowan classification, six (28.6%) patients were grade I, 11 (52.3%), grade II, and four (19.1%), grade III in the preoperative period. RESULTS: The mean post-operative follow-up time was 25.7 months. In the post-operative period, patients were evaluated according to the Bishop score scale, and nine of them (42.8%) showed excellent results, seven (33.3%) had good results, three (14.2%), regular, and two patients (9.5%) had poor results. The authors did not find in this series any complications represented by residual valgus instability, permanent lesion of the ulnar nerve, recurrent compression, or subluxation of the ulnar nerve. Complications found were the loss of the movement arch in one case (4.7%), superficial infection in one case (4.7%), and residual pain in one case (4.7%). CONCLUSION: The results allow for the conclusion that partial medial epicondylectomy of the elbow associated to neurolysis of the ulnar nerve is effective and safe to treat cubital tunnel syndrome.

The surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: a decision analysis

The objective of our study was to use decision analysis to compare four common surgical treatments for cubital tunnel syndrome: simple decompression of the cubital tunnel, medial epicondylectomy, anterior subcutaneous transposition and anterior submuscular transposition. The variables used for this decision analysis model were based on data from the literature. Extensive sensitivity analyses were carried out to test the impact of the values given to these variables on the outcome of the model. The highest expected utility, 0.973, was associated with simple decompression. The expected utility was 0.969 for subcutaneous transposition and 0.965 for submuscular transposition. Medial epicondylectomy had the lowest expected utility at 0.961. Simple decompression remained the preferred strategy in extensive one-way sensitivity analyses.