Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Research Articles

Players' perspectives on successfully returning to professional baseball after medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction

As the incidence of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) surgery continues to rise, an improved understanding of baseball pitchers' perspectives on the postoperative recovery process and return to pitching is needed. The purpose of this study was to analyze pitchers' perspectives on recovery after UCLR. dDuring the 2018 baseball season, an online questionnaire was distributed to the certified athletic trainers of all 30 Major League Baseball (MLB) organizations. These athletic trainers then administered the survey to all players within their organization including MLB and 6 levels of Minor League Baseball. MLB or Minor League Baseball pitchers who had previously undergone UCLR and participated in a rehabilitation program (or were currently participating in one at time of the survey) were included in the study. There were 530 professional pitchers who met inclusion criteria. The majority (81%) of pitchers began rehabilitation within 2 weeks of surgery, with 51% beginning within 1 week. The majority of pitchers began a long-toss throwing program at 5 and 6 months after surgery (27% and 21%), with 52% making their first throw off a mound between 7 and 9 months. The number of pitchers who participated in a weighted ball throwing program decreased significantly after surgery (20%-11%, P < .001). After UCLR, 56% of pitchers reported no changes regarding pitching mechanics or types of pitches thrown, 42% reported changed mechanics, and only 3% either decreased or stopped throwing a certain pitch type. Overall, 54% believed that their current throwing velocity was faster than their velocity before ulnar collateral ligament injury. Twenty percent of pitchers reported experiencing a setback that resulted in temporary stoppage of their rehabilitation program, the most common reason being flexor tightness or tendonitis (53%). Seventy-six percent reported that they were not concerned about sustaining another elbow injury; however, significantly less (61%; P < .001) stated that they would have UCLR again if necessary. Although UCLR is generally reported to have excellent clinical outcomes, 20% of pitchers experienced a significant setback during their rehabilitation and only 61% of pitchers, having gone through UCLR and the subsequent recovery, would be willing to undergo revision surgery and repeat the rehabilitation process if it were to become necessary. In addition, 42% of pitchers felt that they had to alter their throwing mechanics to return to pitching. Surgeons and athletic trainers should aim to understand the UCLR recovery process from the pitchers' perspective to better counsel future patients recovering from UCLR.

Comparison of tendon-bone healing between a newly developed ultrasound device and the conventional metallic drill in a rabbit MCL reconstruction model

BackgroundLigament reconstructive surgeries demand tunnel creation using an over-drilling technique, though this technique has some problems such as metallic particle liberation or difficulties in tunnel creation other than circular cross-section. Recently, a new ultrasound (US) device for bone excavation to overcome these problems was developed. This study aimed to compare the tendon-bone healing in tunnels created using the new US device to that created using the conventional drill in a rabbit model. MethodsA total of 72 rabbits underwent a reconstruction for the anterior half of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) using a half of the patellar tendon. For the femoral tunnel creation, a new US device was used in 36 rabbits (US group), while a conventional metallic drill was used for the remaining 36 rabbits (DR group). At 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively, biomechanical (n = 10) and histological (n = 2) evaluations were performed. ResultsThe ultimate failure load was almost equivalent between the US and DR groups at each period (US/DR; 4 weeks, 50.0 ± 12.8 N/43.4 ± 18.9 N, p = 0.62; 8 weeks, 78.6 ± 11.5 N/77.3 ± 29.9 N, p = 0.92; and 12 weeks: 98.9 ± 33.5 N/102.2 ± 38.3 N, p = 0.80). Pull-out failure from the femoral tunnel was only observed in two rabbits in the US group and one rabbit in the DR group at 4 weeks postoperatively. At 8 and 12 weeks, all specimens had a mid-substance tear. The collagen fiber continuity between tendon and bone occurred 8 weeks postoperatively in both groups and no histological difference was recognized throughout the evaluation period. ConclusionsThe tunnels created using the new US device and the conventional drill had equivalent biomechanical and histological features in tendon-bone healing. The bone excavation technology by the new US device may be applicable in ligament reconstructive surgeries.

Indications, Outcomes, and Complications of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow for Chronic Posterolateral Rotatory Instability: A Systematic Review

Background: Posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) of the elbow can lead to pain, recurrent dislocations, and, in the worst-case scenario, disability. Purpose: To report the indications, outcomes, and complication rates of lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction for chronic PLRI of the elbow. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The review entailed 17 studies that included 168 patients with isolated LUCL reconstruction for chronic PLRI. Patients with concurrent medial collateral ligament reconstruction were excluded. The primary outcome measures were patient characteristics, indication for surgery, surgical technique, functional outcomes, and complications. Results: Chronic PLRI commonly occurred after a previous traumatic injury (n = 168). Of these, there were 119 simple instabilities (no fracture) and 33 complex instabilities (associated fracture). In 11 patients, PLRI was iatrogenic. The cause was unknown in 5 patients. Grafts used were autograft (n = 102; 61%), allograft (n = 18; 11%), synthetic graft (n = 15; 9%), and unknown (n = 33; 20%). The most common surgical technique was a docking procedure or a modification of this (n = 145; 86%). Other techniques included suture anchors (n = 18; 11%), nonanatomic (n = 1; 0.6%), and unknown (n = 4; 2%). There were 45 complications reported in 37 patients (22%). The most frequent complication was recurrent instability (21/138; 15%). No other major complications were reported. The rate of recurrent instability was significantly higher in revision reconstructions (6/15 elbows; 40%) compared with primary reconstructions (15/123 elbows; 12.2%) (P = .005). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score and abbreviated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score were 87.5 (range, 40-100) and 18.8 (range, 0-77), respectively. Of the patients in whom range of motion was measured, 134 of 144 patients (93%) regained a functional range (30L–130L). Conclusion: LUCL reconstruction for chronic PLRI proved a reliable method of reconstruction, save for the moderate rate of recurrent instability, which was highest in revision reconstructions.

Length Change Pattern of the Medial Structures of the Knee and Related Reconstructions

Aims and Objectives:Chronic medial instability presents a severe problem both for the patient and the surgeon, and may result into anterior cruciate ligament graft failure in a combined anteromedial instability. Thus, reconstructions have been developed to conquer this problem. However, these are not capable of mimicking the flat anatomy of the medial structures of the knee. The goal of the present study was to examine the length change patterns of the native medial structures of the knee and their related reconstructions. It was hypothesised that the different portions of the medial collateral ligament present different length change patterns, which cannot be imitated by current reconstructions.Materials and Methods:Eight cadaveric knees were dissected of skin and subcutaneous fat. The satorius fascia was removed to get a clear vision of the medial structures. The knee was then mounted in a rig and the quadriceps muscle and the iliotibial tract were loaded, using cables and hanging weights, according to its fiber orientations and cross-sections. Threads attached to three tibial pins at the anterior/middle/posterior portion of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) were then guided to three femoral eyelets at the anterior/middle/posterior portion of the femoral MCL insertion and analogous with the tibial/femoral posterior oblique ligament (POL) insertion. A tibial pin was also put at the semitendinosus insertion to imitate the Lind reconstruction. Between 0-120 degree knee flexion, the distances between each possible tibiofemoral combination were measured using a linea variable differential transformer (LVDT). Statistical analysis was performed using two way repeated measurements ANOVA.Results:The anterior MCL showed an initial slackening (2%) until 20° flexion, followed by a tightening (5%) towards deep flexion (120°), meaning that it is tight in flexion. The posterior MCL also showed an initial slackening (4%) until 20° of flexion. However, then followed by an isometric area (20-80°) and a further slackening (8%) towards deep flexion (120°), meaning that it is tight in extension. The three portions of the POL showed a linear slackening between 0-120° (25%). The middle MCL showed a sine wave behaviour, slackening from 0- 60° (3%) and tightening between 60-100° (1%). This behaviour was similar in the Lind and Robinson reconstruction, which were the most isometric tibiofemoral combinations (total strain range: 5,3 ± 2,1). The native POL length changes showed the most non-isometric behaviour resulting into a total strain range of 28,8 ± 6,2, which was significantly different from the native MCL and MCL reconstructions (p< .001)Conclusion:The anterior, middle, and posterior parts of the MCL showed different length change patterns. The anterior part tightened in flexion, whereas the posterior part tightened in extension. This behavior could not be reproduced by the current reconstructions, such as the Lind and Robinson procedure, which only could imitate the middle portion of the native MCL.

Single-bundle MCL reconstruction with anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction does not restore knee kinematics.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare knee kinematics and kinetics following either single bundle, modified triangular or double-bundle reconstruction of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) with single bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction. Using a cadaveric model (n = 10), the knee kinematics and kinetics following three MCL reconstructions (single-bundle(SB), double-bundle(DB), modified triangular) with single bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction were compared with the intact and deficient knee state. The knees were tested under (1) an 89-N anterior tibial load, (2) 5 N-m internal and external rotational tibial torques, and (3) a 7 N-m valgus torque. Anatomic ACL reconstruction with SB MCL reconstruction was able to restore anterior tibial translation and external rotation to intact knee values but failed to the internal and valgus rotatory stability. Anatomical DB MCL reconstruction (with SB ACL reconstruction) and the modified triangular MCL reconstruction (with SB ACL reconstruction) restored allknee kinematics to the intact value. This study shows that clinical presentation with combined ACL and severe sMCL injury, single-bundle MCL with single-bundle ACL reconstruction does not restore knee kinematics. Anatomical double-bundle MCL reconstruction may produce slightly better biomechanical stability than the modified triangular MCL reconstruction, but the modified triangular reconstruction might be more clinically practical with the advantages of being less invasive and technically simpler while at the same time can restore a nearly normal knee joint.

The History and Evolution of Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: from Tommy John to 2020.

The purpose of this review article is to discuss the evolution of surgical reconstruction of the anterior bundle of the UCL, otherwise known as Tommy John surgery, from Dr. Jobe's initial description in 1986 to present day. In particular, the unique changes brought forth by each new surgical technique, and the reasons that these changes were implemented, are highlighted. The incidence of UCL reconstruction surgery continues to increase significantly, particularly in the 15- to 19-year-old age group. New anatomic understanding of the anterior bundle of the UCL, including the importance of the central fibers and the broad and tapered ulnar insertion, may affect optimal UCL reconstruction techniques in the future. Although return to play rates are generally quite high (80-95%), the mean time to return to play (typically 12-18months for pitchers) is longer than desired. Accordingly, many authors feel that there remains room for improvement in the treatment of this common injury. The Tommy John surgery has evolved in many ways with the development of novel techniques over the last 35years. Currently, overhead throwing athletes undergoing UCL reconstruction have high return to play and low complication rates. Future modifications to the surgery may aim to further improve outcomes and, more importantly, expedite the length of postoperative rehabilitation.

Revision Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Baseball Pitchers: Review of Epidemiology, Surgical Techniques, and Outcomes.

The purposes of this review are to describe the epidemiology, treatment options, and clinical outcomes of revision medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in baseball pitchers. Rates of revision UCL range from 1 to 15% and have slowly increased over the past several years. Revision UCL procedures are associated with higher complication rates, likely due to the distortion of innate anatomy after primary reconstruction. Techniques for reconstruction are largely influenced by the index surgery and integrity of the ulnar and humeral bone tunnels/sockets. Current literature reporting on the outcomes following revision UCL reconstruction is limited to case series and database studies. Mean time between primary reconstruction and revision surgery is approximately 5years and return to play rates range from 47 to 85%. Outcomes following revision UCL reconstruction are relatively guarded compared with those of primary UCL reconstruction with the most studies reporting lower return to play rates, decreased workloads compared with pre-injury levels of play, and shorter career longevity following revision surgery. Future research regarding optimal reconstruction techniques and post-operative rehabilitation are needed as the incidence and demand for this procedure is expected to increase.

Percutaneous Medial Collateral Ligament Repair and Posteromedial Corner Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation

The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is among the most commonly injured structures of the knee. Most cases are managed nonoperatively; however, grade III injuries and injuries associated with multiligament injuries to the knee are often managed surgically. MCL reconstruction procedures are the most widely used surgical option, but modern advancements have seen a renewed interest in ligamentous repair that avoids graft-site morbidity. In addition, augmentation of the repair protects the ligament during the healing phase and allows early mobilization. This article describes, with video illustration, percutaneous MCL repair and posteromedial corner repair with suture tape augmentation.

Graft choice in combined anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament reconstruction.

There is a concern regarding which grafts should be used in combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstructions, with a paucity of recommendations focused on this specific topic.Expert opinions suggest the use of allograft-only reconstructions to limit donor-site morbidity or using at least one allograft and one autograft.When a hamstring tendon autograft is harvested, techniques that maintain both the integrity of the sartorius fascia and the gracilis are recommended because of the role that the ST-G-S (semitendinosus-gracilis-sartorius) complex plays in valgus stability in the setting of an MCL-deficient knee.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:221-225. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190049

Patient outcomes for the Internal Joint Stabilizer of the Elbow (IJS-E)

Recently, the Internal Joint Stabilizer of the Elbow (IJS-E) was developed as an internal dynamic fixator for use in the setting of traumatic elbow instability. This study reviews the patients who had an IJS-E placed at our institution. Specifically, postoperative complications, postoperative functional outcomes, and need for subsequent procedures were reviewed. A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients in whom the IJS-E was implanted from June 2016 to July 2018. Indications for use, range of motion at final follow-up, and the need for subsequent procedures were reviewed. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Broberg-Morrey scores were also obtained. Ten IJS-E devices were implanted into 10 patients. Average length of follow-up was 13.4 months. Average flexion-extension and pronation-supination motion arcs at final follow-up were 106° and 141°, respectively. Seventy-eight percent of patients achieved >100° arcs of both flexion-extension and pronation-supination. Average DASH and Broberg-Morrey scores were 28.7 and 68.2, respectively. Four subsequent procedures were required in 4 patients: 2 contracture releases, 1 medial collateral ligament reconstruction, and 1 total elbow arthroplasty. There were no postoperative infections or nerve injuries. The IJS-E has replaced the use of external hinged fixation at our institution. Final range of motion was consistent with that reported for terrible triad and complex elbow dislocation injuries. The IJS-E is a good option for use in patients with traumatic elbow instability, as it restores motion and function without immediate postoperative complication. However, it does not eliminate the potential for future operative intervention in these complex injuries.

Management of multiligament knee injuries.

Up to 18% of multiligament knee injuries (MLKI) have an associated vascular injury.All MLKI should be assessed using the ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) with selective arteriography if ABPI is < 0.9.An ischaemic limb following knee dislocation must be taken to the operating theatre immediately for stabilization and re-vascularization.Partial common peroneal nerve (CPN) injury following MLKI has better recovery than complete palsy.Posterior tibial tendon transfer is offered to patients with complete CPN palsy if there is no recovery at six months.Operative treatment with acute or staged reconstructions provides the best outcome in MLKI.Effective repair can only be performed within three weeks of injury.There is no difference between repair and reconstruction of medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner.Posterolateral corner reconstruction has a lower failure rate than repair.Early mobilization following MLKI surgery results in fewer range-of-motion deficits.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:145-155. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190012

Anatomic Dissection and CT Imaging of the Anterior Cruciate and Medial Collateral Ligament Footprint Anatomy in Skeletally Immature Cadaver Knees.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries in skeletally immature patients are increasingly recognized and surgically treated. However, the relationship between the footprint anatomy and the physes are not clearly defined. The purpose of this study was to identify the origin and insertion of the ACL and MCL, and define the footprint anatomy in relation to the physes in skeletally immature knees. Twenty-nine skeletally immature knees from 16 human cadaver specimens were dissected and divided into 2 groups: group A (aged 2 to 5 y), and group B (aged 7 to 11 y). Metallic markers were placed to mark the femoral and tibial attachments of the ACL and MCL. Computed tomography scans were obtained for each specimen used to measure the distance from the center of the ligament footprints to the respective distal femoral and proximal tibial physes. The median distance from the ACL femoral epiphyseal origin to the distal femoral physis was 0.30 cm (interquartile range, 0.20 to 0.50 cm) and 0.70 cm (interquartile range, 0.45 to 0.90 cm) for groups A and B, respectively. The median distance from the ACL epiphyseal tibial insertion to the proximal tibial physis for groups A and B were 1.50 cm (interquartile range, 1.40 to 1.60 cm) and 1.80 cm (interquartile range, 1.60 to 1.85 cm), respectively. The median distance from the MCL femoral origin on the epiphysis to the distal femoral physis was 1.20 cm (interquartile range, 1.00 to 1.20 cm) and 0.85 cm (interquartile range, 0.63 to 1.00 cm) for groups A and B, respectively. The median distance from the MCL insertion on the tibial metaphysis to the tibial physis was 3.05 cm (interquartile range, 2.63 to 3.30 cm) and 4.80 cm (interquartile range, 3.90 to 5.10 cm) for groups A and B, respectively. Surgical reconstruction is a common treatment for ACL injury. Computed tomography scanning of pediatric tissue clearly defines the location of the ACL and MCL with respect to the femoral and tibial physes, and may guide surgeons for physeal respecting procedures. In addition to ACL reconstruction, recent basic science and clinical research suggest that ACL repair may be more commonly performed in the future. MCL repair and reconstruction is also occasionally required in skeletally immature patients. This information may be useful to help surgeons avoid or minimize physeal injury during ACL/MCL reconstructions and/or repair in skeletally immature patients.

Reconstruction of the Tibial Collateral Ligament With Bone Tunnels and Double Strand of the Semitendinosus Tendon

Different surgical techniques for the reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) have been developed. Despite advances in the understanding and improvement of the reconstruction techniques for MCL, there is still no consensus as to the gold-standard procedure, mainly due to the fact that clinical evidence regarding the results of these procedures is lacking. Studies have shown that the reconstruction of MCL based on its anatomical insertions has led to less biomechanical variation and to good functional results. We describe a surgical technique of anatomical reconstruction with a double band of the superficial MCL through a minimally invasive approach using semitendinosus autograft. This technique has the advantage of restoring valgus and rotational stability of the knee with low surgical morbidity.

Trends in Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair and Reconstruction in the United States

Trends in Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair and Reconstruction in the United States

Weave Technique for Reconstruction of Medial Collateral Ligament and Posterior Oblique Ligament: An Anatomic Approach Using Semitendinosus Tendon

Medial collateral ligament (MCL) is the most commonly injured ligament in knee. The majority of MCL tears can be managed conservatively, and reconstruction or augmentation is required in few selected cases. Anatomic MCL and posterior oblique ligament reconstruction have good functional outcome, but it requires 2 tunnels each in the tibia and femur, which may be a limitation in cases in which multiligament reconstruction is required. Several studies report the use of semitendinosus tendon with intact tibial attachment for MCL reconstruction. Since the attachment of semitendinosus is anterior to MCL footprint, it is non-anatomic and anisometric, which may lead to increased laxity of the reconstructed ligament in due course of time. To prevent the laxity in long term, the reconstruction has to be isometric and anatomic. We, hereby, are reporting our unique technique of MCL and posterior oblique ligament reconstruction using intact semitendinosus at tibial attachment and re-routing to the MCL which makes the reconstruction anatomic and isometric. A supplemental video demonstration of the technique is attached with this article.

Anatomic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Ulnar Tunnel Position in Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Although numerous techniques of reconstruction of the medial ulnar collateral ligament (mUCL) have been described, limited evidence exists on the biomechanical implication of changing the ulnar tunnel position despite the fact that more recent literature has clarified that the ulnar footprint extends more distally than was appreciated in the past. Purpose: To evaluate the size and location of the native ulnar footprint and assess valgus stability of the medial elbow after UCL reconstruction at 3 ulnar tunnel locations. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eighteen fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows were dissected to expose the mUCL. The anatomic footprint of the ulnar attachment of the mUCL was measured with a digitizing probe. The area of the ulnar footprint and midpoint relative to the joint line were determined. Medial elbow stability was tested with the mUCL in an intact, deficient, and reconstructed state after the docking technique, with ulnar tunnels placed at 5, 10, or 15 mm from the ulnotrochlear joint line. A 3-N·m valgus torque was applied to the elbow, and valgus rotation of the ulna was recorded via motion-tracking cameras as the elbow was cycled through a full range of motion. After kinematic testing, specimens were loaded to failure at 70° of elbow flexion. Results: The mean ± SD length of the mUCL ulnar footprint was 27.4 ± 3.3 mm. The midpoint of the anatomic footprint was located between the 10- and 15-mm tunnels across all specimens at a mean 13.6 mm from the joint line. Sectioning of the mUCL increased elbow valgus rotation throughout all flexion angles and was statistically significant from 30° to 100° of flexion as compared with the intact elbow (P < .05). mUCL reconstruction at all 3 tunnel locations restored stability to near intact levels with no significant differences among the 3 ulnar tunnel locations at any flexion angle. Conclusion: Positioning the ulnar graft fixation site up to 15 mm from the ulnotrochlear joint line does not significantly increase valgus rotation in the elbow. Clinical Relevance: A more distal ulnar tunnel may be a viable option to accommodate individual variation in morphology of the proximal ulna or in a revision setting.

Advanced Baseball Metrics Indicate Significant Decline in MLB Pitcher Value After Tommy John Surgery.

There are conflicting reports regarding the efficacy of Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers following medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR). As advanced baseball metrics have revolutionized the way general managers define pitchers' value, the authors believe that these should be used to measure clinical outcomes after UCLR. All MLB pitchers who underwent UCLR from April 1, 1991, through July 1, 2016, were compiled (N=253). Pitcher demographics and statistics were collected for up to 3 full seasons preceding and following surgery. Data for pitching controls (all MLB [AMLB] pitchers) were also collected (N=14,756). Prior to surgery, pitchers with UCLR were significantly better than the AMLB pitchers in nearly all advanced value-based statistics: higher wins above replacement (WAR; 0.93 vs 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.06), lower fielding independent pitching (FIP; 4.23 vs 4.51; 95% CI, 4.12-4.34), lower expected fielding independent pitching (xFIP; 4.17 vs 4.38; 95% CI, 4.06-4.28), higher win probability added (WPA; 0.21 vs 0.05; 95% CI, 0.1-0.32), and higher leverage index (pLI; 1.03 vs 0.96; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06). Pitchers who returned to play after UCLR demonstrated significantly lower value with worse WAR, FIP, WPA, and pLI (P<.05). Conversely, after excluding pitchers who failed to achieve a sustained return to play of greater than 1 year, there were no significant decreases in value after surgery. The authors conclude that, prior to injury, pitchers who have UCLR are more valuable than average MLB pitchers. However, UCLR pitchers perform worse when compared with their presurgical values. This may be affected by players not being able to continue their careers for more than 1 year. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(6):349-354.].

Stener-Like Lesions of the Superficial Medial Collateral Ligament of the Knee: MRI Features.

To listen to the podcast associated with this article, please select one of the following: iTunes or Google Play. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to describe Stener-like lesions of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) of the knee, which, to our knowledge, have not yet been reported in the radiologic literature. This lesion, defined as a distal tear with interposition of osseous or soft-tissue structures between the ligament and its tibial attachment, often requires surgical intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Knee MRI examinations of grade 3 sMCL tears were identified via a search of department imaging and orthopedic case files of medial collateral ligament (MCL) tears for the period of January 2010-April 2017 using the keywords "complete MCL tear" or "near complete MCL tear." Two musculoskeletal radiologists reviewed the MRI examinations. The location of the sMCL tear, presence of a Stener-like lesion, associated ligamentous injuries, and surgical findings were recorded. RESULTS. Review of 65 knee MRI examinations identified 20 cases of distal tibial grade 3 sMCL tear. Of the distal tears, 12 (60%) were Stener-like lesions and six (30%) were borderline lesions. Of these 18 cases, 14 (78%) were associated with multiligament knee injury and nine (50%) underwent MCL repair or reconstruction. Ten of the 12 (83%) Stener-like lesions were displaced superficial to the pes anserinus and two (17%) were entrapped, one in a reverse Segond fracture and one in the femorotibial compartment. CONCLUSION. Stener-like lesions represent a high percentage of tibia-sided sMCL avulsions, are found most often with pes anserinus interposition, and are frequently associated with multiligamentous injury, suggesting high-energy trauma. MRI diagnosis is important because interposition preventing anatomic healing and potential secondary valgus instability often prompt surgical intervention.

Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Anteromedial Reinforcement for Medial and Anteromedial Rotatory Instability of the Knee

Even though structures of the medial side of the knee have a high potential to heal without surgery, in some circumstances injuries of this region may lead to development of chronic medial and anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI). In those circumstances, surgery should be performed. Current-day surgical techniques are focused on recreating the function of the main stabilizers of the medial side of the knee, which are the medial collateral ligament and the posterior oblique ligament, but they omit the role of the anteromedial capsule. Nonetheless, they are able to restore at most “near-native” biomechanics of the joint, are highly invasive, and require advanced skills in posteromedial knee surgery. Maybe we should take a look at chronic medial instability and AMRI from the other side? We present a minimally invasive reconstruction of the superficial medial collateral ligament with anteromedial reinforcement for the AMRI component. Level of evidence: 1 (knee) and 2 (collateral ligaments).

Medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction results in improved medial stability: results from the Danish knee ligament reconstruction registry (DKRR).

The aim of this study was to compare outcome data after isolated and combined (MCL) plus anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction based on objective and subjective measures using data from the (DKRR). There are only a few small-sized case studies on outcomes after MCL reconstruction. MCL reconstruction was hypothesised to improve both objective and subjective outcomes. All patients who were registered in the DKRR between 2005 and 2016 (N = 25,281) and who underwent isolated ACL (n = 24,683), isolated MCL (n = 103) or combined MCL plus ACL (n = 495) reconstructions were retrospectively identified. Objective (valgus knee stability and sagittal knee laxity) and subjective (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Tegner activity scale score) outcomes in these three cohorts were evaluated at the 1-year follow-up by comparing pre- and post-operative values. Medial stability improved significantly pre- to post-operatively after both isolated MCL and combined MCL plus ACL reconstruction, with 26 (53%) and 195 (69%) of the patients, respectively, having normal valgus stability (0-2mm laxity). Sagittal stability was similar after MCL plus ACL reconstruction and isolated ACL reconstruction (1.7 and 1.5mm, respectively). At the 1-year follow-up, although the KOOS of the patients in the isolated MCL and combined MCL plus ACL reconstruction cohorts improved significantly, they were lower than those of the patients in the isolated ACL reconstruction cohort. Both isolated MCL reconstruction and combined MCL plus ACL reconstruction resulted in significant and clinically relevant improvements in the subjective outcomes from pre-operative conditions to the 1-year follow-up. Valgus stability also improved significantly, with two-thirds of patients obtaining normal valgus stability after MCL reconstruction. Subjective outcomes were similar between isolated MCL reconstruction and combined MCL plus ACL reconstructions, but were poorer than isolated ACL reconstructions. Level III.