ABSTRACT Journalism has long had an uneasy relationship with subjectivity. However, when it comes to podcasting personal storytelling is often highlighted as a strength. Top journalism prizes such as the Pulitzer are frequently awarded to podcasts that report through a subjective frame. The common podcasting technique of self-reflexivity has also been highlighted as valuable in transparently revealing elements of the journalistic process, with potential to build audience trust. While there is now a substantial body of research focused on podcast journalism, there has been limited focus on how the prominent use of subjectivity might relate to the medium’s democratic function. Guided by constructive journalism, this study explores how journalistic subjectivity can be mediated in podcast production in ways that enhance the medium’s democratic value. It combines practice-led research with mixed methods, with efforts to involve the podcast audience in journalistic production. It demonstrates how attempts to cultivate a journalistic persona and reveal elements the journalistic process can be leveraged to encourage pro-social attitudes. The experimental approach provides a model for future research applying constructive journalism to podcasting, building on Lindgren and Jorgensen’s [2023. Podcasting and constructive journalism in health stories about antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Media International Australia, 187(1), 73-87] study.
Read full abstract