Reviewed by: Everyday Movies: Portable Film Projectors and the Transformation of American Culture by Haidee Wasson Gaurav Pai (bio) Everyday Movies: Portable Film Projectors and the Transformation of American Culture by Haidee Wasson. University of California Press. 2020. 288 pages. $85.00 hardcover; $29.95 paper; also available in e-book. The recent expansion in the study of nontheatrical and amateur film—both made with small-gauge film technologies—resembles that of film noir around three decades ago. Scholars studying North American film discovered a new tranche of films that had hitherto been judged to be of inferior quality, not worthy as objects of scholarly historiography, and subsequently relegated to the margins of cinema and media studies. Patricia R. Zimmermann fired the first major salvo for amateur media in 1995 with her monograph Reel Families: A Social History of Amateur Film, and soon thereafter historians such as Alan Kattelle and Anthony Slide began collating information from amateur and specialty periodicals, while Rick Prelinger began cataloging thousands of films that were shown outside of movie theaters.1 In the past two decades, the journal Film History has produced at least four issues dedicated to amateur and nontheatrical film, edited by scholars who have gone on to produce book-length [End Page 224] monographs and edited collections.2 Common to all this scholarship is the claim that this diverse collection of films has production histories, technologies of reception, and aesthetics that are radically different from that of popular feature films. Amateur and nontheatrical filmmakers rarely followed an industrial mode of production; their work was mostly seen outside of theaters, and its contents ranged from the educational to the sponsored, and even the experimental. That most of these films were made with small-gauge technologies only enhances this binarized theorization, where nontheatrical cinema is seen as the opposite of theatrical cinema. Haidee Wasson's new book challenges this supposed opposition. By examining the portability of the equipment that was used to make, disseminate, and watch amateur and nontheatrical films, Wasson recontextualizes them in the broader arc of film history from early cinema to digital media. By firmly ensconcing film practices based on portable technologies in twentiethcentury American culture, Wasson helps readers take another step inside the still evolving field of nontheatrical film, within the broader fields of cinema and media studies, media archaeology, and American studies. Wasson's central argument is that portable, or small-gauge, film technologies played as significant a role in the cultural, technological, and sensorial production of media consumers in the twentieth-century United States as Hollywood movies—clearly a transgressive take on the traditionally understood relationship between the two. For Wasson, portability refers to "a set of foundational capacities that transformed both recording and playback devices and thus affected the ways in which words, sounds, and images have been inscribed, stored, and then circulated and accessed."3 The noninflammable "safety" film stock of small gauges such as 16mm and 8mm offered such portability and allowed for industrial films, educational films, military films, amateur films, and science films to be screened at multiple venues outside the traditional movie theater. Wasson explains that the personnel behind film projection technologies intended for nontheatrical spaces used gauge as a "tactic to make portability seem less threatening to the studios and to theater owners, still mighty lynch pins in the film ecology."4 After World War II, these portable technologies grew in usage. Indeed, Wasson provides detailed statistical evidence to argue that portable projectors came to outnumber movie theaters in the years just after the war.5 So while conventional film history sees the 1950s as the fall of classical Hollywood and the rise of television, it was also a boom time for small-gauge film technologies and film stock sales. In this way, Wasson decenters the movie theater at the center of our imagination and understanding as the principal way moving images were consumed and enjoyed in the twentieth century. Or, put another way, she places portable [End Page 225] small-gauge film at the center, rather than at the periphery, of our assumptions about cinema and its histories. Everyday Movies paints a portrait of a sprawling technological infrastructure of making, showing...