Mechanism In Renal Cell Carcinoma Research Articles

1364. Adenoviral Gene Therapy for Renal Cancer Requires Retargeting to Alternative Cellular Receptors

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most treatment-resistant malignancies in humans. Therefore, the identification of new agents with better antitumor activity merits a high priority in the treatment of advanced RCC. In this regard, gene therapy with adenoviral (Ad) vectors is a promising new modality for cancer. However, a primary limiting factor for the use of Ad vectors for cancer gene therapy is their critical dependence on cellular expression of the primary Ad receptor, the coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR), known to be down-regulated in many cancer types. Following the identification of CAR deficiency in RCC lines, we have found abundant membrane expression of alpha(v)beta 3 and alpha(v)beta 5 integrins and of the putative receptor to Ad serotype 3 (Ad3). As an alternative gene therapy approach for RCC that would circumvent CAR deficiency, we employed retargeting of replication-incompetent Ad vectors and replication-competent Ad viruses to alpha(v)beta 3 and alpha(v)beta 5 integrins and to the putative Ad3 receptor. These strategies to genetically alter Ad tropism were based on either the insertion of a cysteine-aspartate-cysteine-arginine-glycine-aspartate-cysteine-phenylalanine-cysteine (RGD) motif into the HI loop of the Ad fiber knob domain or on generation of a chimeric Ad fiber composed of adenovirus serotype 5 shaft/Ad3 knob. Both strategies proved highly efficient to circumvent CAR deficiency and enhance gene delivery into RCC cells. Furthermore, in the context of replication-competent Ad, tropism alteration resulted in distinct capacity of the retargeted viruses to infect, replicate, and lyse RCC models in vitro and in vivo. The retargeting strategies were particularly beneficial in the context of replication-competent Ad. These findings underscore the importance of CAR-independent cellular entry mechanisms in RCC and are highly consequential for the development of viral antitumor agents for RCC and other CAR-negative tumors.

Constitutive activation of nuclear factor-kappaB prevents TRAIL-induced apoptosis in renal cancer cells.

TRAIL has gained much attention for its specific induction of apoptosis in cancer cells but not in normal cells. This phenomenon has been explained thus: that cancer cells dominantly express death receptors while normal cells express decoy receptors. However, recent reports have shown that some cancer cell lines are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis despite the absence of decoy receptors and the presence of death receptors. This suggested the existance of an inhibitory factor. We herein showed that NF-kappaB is a key molecule underlying the TRAIL-resistant mechanism in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines. We observed that NF-kappaB is constitutively activated in resistant cell lines. Forced expression of antisense cDNA of IkappaBalpha, a specific inhibitor of NF-kappaB, in TRAIL-sensitive cell lines with a low NF-kappaB activity result in constitutive activation of NF-kappaB and resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Adenoviral expression of a stable form of IkappaBalpha in the TRAIL-resistant cell lines induced apoptosis. These data suggest that RCC can be classified into two subsets: TRAIL-sensitive RCC with a low NF-kappaB activity and TRAIL-resistant RCC with constitutively activated NF-kappaB. In the former group TRAIL can be a treatment option, while in the latter group a molecular approach targeting NF-kappaB appears to be a promising therapy.