This study investigates corporate criminal liability in public transportation accidents caused by vehicle unfitness, a pressing issue in Indonesia’s road safety framework. While Law Number 22 of 2009 on Road Traffic and Transportation (UU LLAJ) aims to promote safety, it predominantly emphasizes driver accountability, leaving corporate negligence largely unaddressed. The research aims to analyze the gaps in the legal framework and propose reforms to ensure corporations are held accountable for their roles in maintaining vehicle roadworthiness. Using a normative legal research design, this study integrates statutory analysis, case law review, and conceptual exploration to examine corporate liability frameworks. Legal theories such as vicarious liability, identification theory, and delegation theory are utilized to conceptualize corporate accountability. Case studies and international legal comparisons provide insights into enforcement challenges and best practices. The findings reveal significant deficiencies in UU LLAJ, including ambiguous provisions and weak enforcement mechanisms, leading to systemic non-compliance. Proposed reforms include stricter penalties for corporate negligence, enhanced vehicle inspection protocols, and expanded legal provisions targeting corporate accountability. This study contributes to the discourse on corporate liability by bridging theoretical principles with practical enforcement in Indonesia’s transportation sector. Its implications extend to policy reforms, road safety improvements, and fostering a culture of accountability within the industry.
Read full abstract