Deficits in inhibitory control contribute to smoking behavior. Inhibitory control training (ICT), which involves repeatedly inhibiting responses to general or substance-related stimuli, shows promise in reducing problematic substance use. This preregistered randomized-controlled trial is the first to investigate the efficacy of general and smoking-specific Go/No-Go task-based ICT on smoking behavior compared to control groups receiving no ICT. Three potential working mechanisms were examined: inhibitory enhancement, automatic stimulus-stop associations, and stimulus devaluation. Individuals who smoke (N=122) were randomly assigned to complete 28 sessions of smoking-specific Go/No-Go, general Go/No-Go, Sham training, or to a Waitlist control condition. Clinical outcomes included daily cigarettes (primary outcome), carbon monoxide levels, tobacco dependence severity, and craving, assessed at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up. Go/No-Go training resulted in a significantly greater reduction in tobacco dependence (β=-0.88, p=.004) and craving (β=-4.31, p=.012) post-intervention compared to both control groups. The greater reduction in craving remained significant when compared to the Sham training group only (β=-4.64, p=.026). No significant effects of group were observed on daily cigarette consumption (β=-1.97, p=.093) or carbon monoxide levels (β=2.16, p=.818) post-intervention. At the 3-month follow-up, no significant effects of group emerged (all ps>.794). Smoking-specific Go/No-Go training did not outperform general Go/No-Go training (all ps>.075). No working mechanism for clinical outcome improvements was identified. Preliminary evidence suggests that (smoking-specific) GNG training reduces tobacco dependence severity and craving post-intervention in individuals who smoke compared to non-ICT-based control conditions. Its efficacy as an add-on in smoking cessation needs to be investigated. DRKS00014652.
Read full abstract