Axon Guidance Mechanisms Research Articles

Proteoglycans as cues for axonal guidance in formation of retinotectal or retinocollicular projections.

Understanding the formation of neuronal circuits has long been one of the basic problems in developmental neurobiology. Projections from the retina to their higher center, the optic tectum in nonmammalian vertebrates and the superior colliculus in mammals, are most amenable to experimental approaches; thus, much information has been accumulated about the mechanisms of axonal guidance. The retinal axons navigate along the appropriate pathway with the help of a series of guidance cues. Although much of the work has focused on proteinaceous factors, proteoglycans have been identified as playing important roles in retinal axon guidance. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans and heparan sulfate proteoglycans are involved in essential decisions of axon steering along the pathway. However, it has not been determined whether diversity of the carbohydrate chains results in differential effects and how their diversity is recognized by growth cones, which represent an important area of future research.

Axon guidance mechanisms and molecules: lessons from invertebrates.

Vertebrates and invertebrates share the formidable task of accurately establishing the elaborate connections that make up their nervous systems. Researchers investigating this process have the challenge of identifying the molecules and mechanisms that underlie this process. Each group of organisms offers their own advantages for piecing together the conserved constituents. Broadly speaking, the invertebrates have allowed the discovery of relevant genes through classical genetic screens for mutations that affect the process of axon guidance, whereas vertebrates provide numerous systems for the elaboration of the functional mechanisms. Here, we focus on the role of invertebrates in characterizing the molecular mechanisms of axon guidance.

Roundabout gene family functions during sensory axon guidance in the drosophila embryo are mediated by both Slit-dependent and Slit-independent mechanisms

roundabout (robo) family genes play key roles in axon guidance in a wide variety of animals. We have investigated the roles of the robo family members, robo, robo2, and robo3, in the guidance of sensory axons in the Drosophila embryo. In robo −/−, slit −/−, and robo −/+ slit −/+ mutants, lateral cluster sensory neurons misproject to cells and axons in the nearby ventral' (v') cluster. These phenotypes, together with the normal expression pattern of Slit and Robo, suggest that Slit ligand secreted from the epidermis interacts with Robo receptors on lateral cluster sensory growth cones to limit their exploration of nearby attractive substrates. The most common sensory axon phenotype seen in robo2 −/− mutants was misprojection of dorsal cluster sensory axons away from their normal growth substrate, the transverse connective of the trachea. slit appears to play no role in this aspect of sensory axon growth. Robo2 is expressed, not on the dorsal sensory axons, but on the transverse connective. These results suggest a novel, non-cell-autonomous mechanism for axon guidance by robo family genes: Robo2 expressed on the trachea acts as an attractant for the dorsal sensory growth cones.

The Tibial-1 Pioneer Pathway: An in Vivo Model for Neuronal Outgrowth and Guidance

As neurons extend axons to their targets during development, growth cones must reorient their direction of migration in response to extracellular guidance cues. A variety of model systems have been employed in order to dissect the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie this complex process. One preparation, the developing grasshopper limb bud, has proved to offer a number of advantages in which to examine mechanisms of growth cone guidance and motility in vivo. First, the relatively large size of the embryonic nervous system allows for straightforward imaging of both fixed and live neurons in vivo. Second, the peripheral nerves generated in the limb bud are highly stereotyped. Third, intact embryos can be cultured for a period of days, allowing for fairly easy perturbations at precise developmental stages. Fourth, due to the ease of dissection, numerous cell biological and molecular techniques can be utilized in the limb bud. Finally, axon guidance molecules and mechanisms are conserved between grasshoppers and other organism, including vertebrates.

Identifying axon guidance defects in the embryonic zebrafish brain.

The method described here outlines a simple protocol to investigate the in vivo function of axon guidance molecules during the development of the embryonic zebrafish brain. By 24 hours postfertilization, a simple scaffold of axon tracts and commissures can be visualised in the brain using acetylated alpha-tubulin, a panaxonal marker that stains all axons. The highly stereotypical trajectory of axons in the embryonic zebrafish brain provides an ideal system in which to study the molecular mechanisms of axon guidance, as defects in the axon scaffold can be clearly visualised. We describe here our approach to identify defects in the trajectory of axons that establish the initial template of tracts in the embryonic fore- and mid-brain. By combining immunohistochemical techniques and confocal microscopy on dissected wholemounts of embryonic brains we are able to observe at high resolution the complete scaffold of axon tracts. This approach provides a rapid and simple means of assessing axon guidance defects in the developing brain. Given the advantages of the zebrafish as a model system, and the range of molecular perturbation methods now available, this technique provides a valuable tool for assessing the phenotypic effects of gene perturbations in a biologically relevant context.

Molecular mechanisms of axon guidance.

Axons are guided along specific pathways by attractive and repulsive cues in the extracellular environment. Genetic and biochemical studies have led to the identification of highly conserved families of guidance molecules, including netrins, Slits, semaphorins, and ephrins. Guidance cues steer axons by regulating cytoskeletal dynamics in the growth cone through signaling pathways that are still only poorly understood. Elaborate regulatory mechanisms ensure that a given cue elicits the right response from the right axons at the right time but is otherwise ignored. With such regulatory mechanisms in place, a relatively small number of guidance factors can be used to generate intricate patterns of neuronal wiring.

Neuropilin-2 is overexpressed in the rat brain after limbic seizures

Structural rearrangement and synaptic reorganization are known to occur in the brain after seizures. If neuronal rearrangement after seizures always results in abnormal hyperexcitability, it would provide an accurate pathway to the appropriate target and as a result, it may be the mechanism of epileptogenesis. This study examined the mechanism of axon guidance in the mature rat brain after seizures by evaluating the expression of the axonal guidance molecule, neuropilin-2. We assessed the expression of neuropilin-2 by northern blotting and immunohistochemistry in rat with seizures created by kindling stimulation and kainate injection.The neuropilin-2 mRNA level was increased in the whole brain of the rats at 24 h after either type of seizure. Neuropilin-2 mRNA was not increased at 2 weeks after the last stimulation. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that neuropilin-2 protein was increased in the dentate gyrus and the entorhinal cortex in the both seizure models. These findings suggested that there was overexpression of neuropilin-2 in the brains of mature rats with different types of seizure. Accordingly, neuropilin-2 might regulate remodeling after seizures as it does during the development of the hippocampal formation. Our findings suggest that axons may not project and outgrow ‘aberrantly’ after seizures, but may be regulated by the chemorepellent effect through neuropilin-2.

Big effects of Runt on Drosophila photoreceptor axon guidance

The Drosophila visual system has provided many important insights into the genetic and molecular mechanisms of axon guidance. Much of this research has focussed on cell surface receptors in growth cones, and signals downstream of them. It is therefore refreshing to see this work by Kaminker et al. [1], in which they define a new level of genetic control over photoreceptor targeting decisions.

Mouse rudimentary diastema tooth primordia are devoid of peripheral nerve fibers.

The tooth is a well-defined peripheral target organ for trigeminal nerve fibers. However, only limited information is available regarding pioneer axon guidance to the developing tooth target field. In rodents there is a toothless diastema region between incisors and molars that in the mouse maxilla contains three rudimentary tooth anlagen. Their development stop at the early bud stage when the primary nerve axons grow towards the developing first molar tooth germs. In order to provide background information for studies of regulatory mechanisms of pioneer axon guidance to the developing tooth germs, we investigated the distribution of nerve fibers in the mouse diastema tooth buds, and compared it to the axon growth to the maxillary and mandibular first molar tooth germs by immunohistochemical localization of peripherin and PGP9.5. Analysis of serial sections showed that trigeminal nerve fibers emerging from the trigeminal maxillary and mandibular nerve trunks started to grow towards the developing molar tooth germ at the early bud stage, and subsequently they diverged into buccal and lingual branches next to the condensed dental mesenchyme. During the cap stage, nerve fibers were observed around the tooth germ in the dental follicle region. In contrast, no nerve fibers were located in the vicinity of the diastema tooth primordia at any stage studied, nor did any nerve fibers appear to grow towards this region. Our results show that the development and subsequent disappearance of the diastema tooth primordia takes place without peripheral trigeminal innervation. The diastema tooth primordia may therefore be a useful model system for future studies on molecular regulatory mechanisms of pioneer axon guidance to the tooth germs, and possibly also for evolutionary studies of peripheral axon guidance mechanisms.

Cellular, genetic and molecular mechanisms of axonal guidance in the zebrafish.

There is organization and pattern in the intricate network of axons that comprise the nervous system. This organization is essential to ensure the establishment of appropriate connections between neurons and their targets. Between the initiation of axonogenesis and the point where an axon reaches its target, is the process of axon guidance. In both invertebrates and vertebrates, axon guidance occurs in a stereotyped manner resulting in the formation of patterned nerves. The growing tip of the axon, the growth cone, responds to cues in the environment. These cues, both attractive and repulsive, dictate where growth cones extend and thus where nerves will form (Tessier-Lavigne and Goodman 1996).

Mechanisms and molecules in motor neuron specification and axon pathfinding.

The vertebrate nervous system performs the most complex functions of any organ system. This feat is mediated by dedicated assemblies of neurons that must be precisely connected to one another and to peripheral tissues during embryonic development. Motor neurons, which innervate muscle and regulate autonomic functions, form an integral part of this neural circuitry. The first part of this review describes the remarkable progress in our understanding of motor neuron differentiation, which is arguably the best understood model of neuronal differentiation to date. During development, the coordinate actions of inductive signals from adjacent non-neural tissues initiate the differentiation of distinct motor neuron subclasses, with specific projection patterns, at stereotypical locations within the neural tube. Underlying this specialisation is the expression of specific homeodomain proteins, which act combinatorially to confer motor neurons with both their generic and subtype-specific properties. Ensuring that specific motor neuron subtypes innervate the correct target structure, however, requires precise motor axon guidance mechanisms. The second half of this review focuses on how distinct motor neuron subtypes pursue highly specific projection patterns by responding differentially to spatially discrete attractive and repulsive molecular cues. The tight link between motor neuron specification and axon pathfinding appears to be established by the dominant role of homeodomain proteins in dictating the ways that navigating motor axons interpret the plethora of guidance cues impinging on growth cones.

Making connections. Meeting: axon guidance and neural plasticity.

Meeting on ‘Axon guidance and neural plasticity’ held at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, NY, September 20–24, 2000 (organized by Tobias Bonhoeffer, Marc Tessier‐Lavigne and Larry Zipursky). ![][1] It was just over a century ago that Santiago Ramon y Cajal first marvelled at the intricate patterns of neuronal connectivity in the nervous system. Finding out how these connections are established has intrigued and challenged generations of developmental neuroscientists. It is, however, only within the last decade that advances in molecular biology, genetics, imaging and electrophysiology have combined to allow the first insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms that control the formation and refinement of neuronal connections. To provide a forum for the exchange of information and ideas in this rapidly expanding field, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory hosts a meeting on ‘Axon guidance and neural plasticity’ every two years. The most recent meeting attracted some 400 participants, 265 of whom presented the results of their latest research. Here we review just a small selection of these presentations, highlighting some of the major new themes that emerged. New mechanisms of axon guidance continue to be discovered at a rapid pace (Table 1). This trend shows no signs of abating. Two highlights of the Cold Spring Harbor meeting were talks reporting the identification of new guidance mechanisms. One of these is implicated in retinal axon targeting in the vertebrate visual system; the other in the inhibition of axon regeneration in the mature mammalian CNS. View this table: Table 1. Some of the molecules that guide axons Ever since the pioneering work of Roger Sperry in the 1950s and ‘60s, the retinotectal system has been an informative model system for both theoretical and experimental studies of axon pathfinding. Retinal axons project topographically to the tectum (or its mammalian equivalent, the superior colliculus): nasal retinal axons map to posterior and temporal axons to anterior tectum (Figure 1A … [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif

Single-Cell Analysis of Drosophila Larval Neuromuscular Synapses

The neuromuscular system of Drosophila has been widely used in studies on synaptic development. In the embryo, the cellular components of this model system are well established, with uniquely identified motoneurons displaying specific connectivity with distinct muscles. Such knowledge is essential to analyzing axon guidance and synaptic matching mechanisms with single-cell resolution. In contrast, to date the cellular identities of the larval neuromuscular synapses are hardly established. It is not known whether synaptic connections seen in the embryo persist, nor is it known how individual motor endings may differentiate through the larval stages. In this study, we combine single-cell dye labeling of individual synaptic boutons and counterstaining of the entire nervous system to characterize the synaptic partners and bouton differentiation of the 30 motoneuron axons from four nerve branches (ISN, SNa, SNb, and SNd). We also show the cell body locations of 4 larval motoneurons (RP3, RP5, V, and MN13-Ib) and the types of innervation they develop. Our observations support the following: (1) Only 1 motoneuron axon of a given bouton type innervates a single muscle, while up to 4 motoneuron axons of different bouton types can innervate the same muscle. (2) The type of boutons which each motoneuron axon forms is likely influenced by cell-autonomous factors. The data offer a basis for studying the properties of synaptic differentiation, maintenance, and plasticity with a high cellular resolution.

Glia dictate pioneer axon trajectories in the Drosophila embryonic CNS.

Whereas considerable progress has been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms of axon guidance across the midline, it is still unclear how the axonal trajectories of longitudinal pioneer neurons, which never cross the midline, are established. Here we show that longitudinal glia of the embryonic Drosophila CNS direct formation of pioneer axon pathways. By ablation and analysis of glial cells missing mutants, we demonstrate that glia are required for two kinds of processes. Firstly, glia are required for growth cone guidance, although this requirement is not absolute. We show that the route of extending growth cones is rich in neuronal cell bodies and glia, and also in long processes from both these cell types. Interactions between neurons, glia and their long processes orient extending growth cones. Secondly, glia direct the fasciculation and defasciculation of axons, which pattern the pioneer pathways. Together these events are essential for the selective fasciculation of follower axons along the longitudinal pathways.

Expression of the Netrin-1 receptor, deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC), is largely confined to projecting neurons in the developing forebrain

Axon guidance mechanisms are crucial to the development of an integrated nervous system. One family of molecules that may be important in establishing axonal connectivity in mammals is the Netrins, and their putative receptors DCC (deleted in colorectal cancer), Neogenin, and Unc-5. Knockout and mutational analyses of some of these genes have shown that they are critically involved in the development of several specific pathways in the developing brain. However, previous expression analyses of these genes have largely been confined to the developing spinal cord. In the present study, we analyzed the expression of DCC in the developing mouse forebrain. We found that DCC protein is expressed in specific axonal populations projecting from the developing olfactory bulb, neocortex, hippocampus, and epithalamus/habenular complex. In the developing olfactory bulb and neocortex, DCC expression is particularly evident during the targeting phase of axon outgrowth and is then rapidly downregulated. As predicted from the knockout and mutational analyses of this gene, DCC is expressed in axonal commissures, in particular the corpus callosum, hippocampal commissure, and the anterior commissure. In addition, we found that DCC is expressed in the habenular commissure, the fasciculus retroflexus, and the stria medularis. Therefore, this analysis implicates a function for DCC in additional axonal guidance systems not predicted from the knockout and mutational analyses.

Axon guidance mechanism of central serotonergic neuron

Axon guidance mechanism of central serotonergic neuron

Selective alterations of glycosaminoglycans synthesis and proteoglycan expression in rat cortex and hippocampus in pilocarpine-induced epilepsy

Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans are elements of matrix. In the nervous system, glycosaminoglycans modulate neurite outgrowth and are co-receptors for growth factors playing a crucial role in cell differentiation and synaptogenesis. The receptor of protein tyrosine phosphatase β (RPTPβ) is a chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan which plays an important role in neural morphogenesis and axon guidance mechanisms. Pilocarpine-treated rats present status epilepticus, which is followed by a seizure-free period (silent), by a period of spontaneous recurrent seizures (chronic), and the hippocampus of these animals exhibits cell loss and mossy fiber sprouting. Thus, the synthesis of heparan sulphate and chondroitin sulphate and the time course of RPTPβ immunoreactivity were studied in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex during these phases of pilocarpine-induced epilepsy. The results showed decreased synthesis of heparan sulphate during the acute phase and an increased synthesis of chondroitin sulphate during the silent period in the cortex and hippocampus. In control rats RPTPβ immunoreactivity was detected only in glial cells. After 6 h of status epilepticus the RPTPβ immunoreactivity was no longer detectable in the glial cells in both tissues and intense staining became evident in the matrix, surrounding CA3 and dentate gyrus and piriform cortex neurones. In the silent and chronic periods RPTPβ immunoreactivity was mainly detected in neuronal somata and fibers of neurones of hippocampus and cortex. These changes show a selective variation of synthesis and expression of glycosaminoglycans and RPTPβ in relation to epilepsy suggesting a molecular interplay between glia and neurones during seizures.

CAMs and FGF cause a local submembrane calcium signal promoting axon outgrowth without a rise in bulk calcium concentration.

Binding of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and cell adhesion molecules to the nerve cell membrane promotes axon outgrowth. This response can be blocked by antagonists of voltage-gated calcium channels, yet no change of cytosolic calcium concentration in the growth cone can be detected upon binding of the growth factor bFGF or the cell adhesion molecule L1. Using barium as a charge carrier, we show that bFGF and L1 open a calcium influx pathway in growth cones of rat sensory neurons without changing the membrane voltage. L1 does not activate influx in cells expressing a dominant negative mutant of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase. FGFR-activated influx is blocked by specific antagonists of L- and N-type voltage-gated calcium channels and by an inhibitor of diacylglycerol lipase. We propose that both L1 and bFGF act via the FGFR to generate polyunsaturated fatty acids which in turn cause calcium channels to flicker open and shut. Short-lived domains of raised calcium at the cytosolic mouth of open channels activate axon outgrowth without raising bulk cytosolic calcium concentration. In confirmation of this model, the rapidly-acting calcium buffer BAPTA is significantly more effective at blocking FGF-induced axon outgrowth when compared with the slower buffer EGTA. Generation of short-lived calcium domains may provide a crucial mechanism for axon guidance during development and for promoting regeneration of damaged axons.

Evidence for a Role of the Chemorepellent Semaphorin III and Its Receptor Neuropilin-1 in the Regeneration of Primary Olfactory Axons

To explore a role for chemorepulsive axon guidance mechanisms in the regeneration of primary olfactory axons, we examined the expression of the chemorepellent semaphorin III (sema III), its receptor neuropilin-1, and collapsin response mediator protein-2 (CRMP-2) during regeneration of the olfactory system. In the intact olfactory system, neuropilin-1 and CRMP-2 mRNA expression define a distinct population of olfactory receptor neurons, corresponding to immature (B-50/GAP-43-positive) and a subset of mature (olfactory marker protein-positive) neurons located in the lower half of the olfactory epithelium. Sema III mRNA is expressed in pial sheet cells and in second-order olfactory neurons that are the target cells of neuropilin-1-positive primary olfactory axons. These data suggest that in the intact olfactory bulb sema III creates a molecular barrier, which helps restrict ingrowing olfactory axons to the nerve and glomerular layers of the bulb. Both axotomy of the primary olfactory nerve and bulbectomy induce the formation of new olfactory receptor neurons expressing neuropilin-1 and CRMP-2 mRNA. After axotomy, sema III mRNA is transiently induced in cells at the site of the lesion. These cells align regenerating bundles of olfactory axons. In contrast to the transient appearance of sema III-positive cells at the lesion site after axotomy, sema III-positive cells increase progressively after bulbectomy, apparently preventing regenerating neuropilin-1-positive nerve bundles from growing deeper into the lesion area. The presence of sema III in scar tissue and the concomitant expression of its receptor neuropilin-1 on regenerating olfactory axons suggests that semaphorin-mediated chemorepulsive signal transduction may contribute to the regenerative failure of these axons after bulbectomy.

Morphological features of the entorhinal–hippocampal connection

The goal of this review is an overview of the structural elements of the entorhinal–hippocampal connection. The development of the dendrites of hippocampal neurons will be outlined in relation to afferent pathway specificity and the mature dendritic structure compared. Interneurons will be contrasted to pyramidal cells in terms of processing of physiological signals and convergence and divergence in control of hippocampal circuits. Mechanisms of axonal guidance and target recognition, target structures, the involvement of receptor distribution on hippocampal dendrites and the involvement of non-neuronal cellular elements in the establishment of specific connections will be presented. Mechanisms relevant for the maintenance of shape and morphological specializations of hippocampal dendrites will be reviewed. One of the significant contexts in which to view these structural elements is the degree of plasticity in which they participate, during development and origination of dendrites, mature synaptic plasticity and after lesions, when the cells must continue to maintain and reconstitute function, to remain part of the circuitry in the hippocampus. This review will be presented in four main sections: (1) interneurons—development, role in synchronizing influence and hippocampal network functioning; (2) principal cells in CA1, CA3 and dentate gyrus regions—their development, function in terms of synaptic integration, differentiating structure and alterations with lesions; (3) glia and glia/neuronal interactions—response to lesions and developmental guidance mechanisms; and (4) network and circuit aspects of hippocampal morphology and functioning. Finally, the interwoven role of these various elements participating in hippocampal network function will be discussed.