Mechanical Circulatory Support Technology Research Articles

Preoperative colonoscopy in patients over age 50 with confirmed gynecologic malignancy

The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices has increased sixfold since 2006. Although there is an established legal and ethical consensus that patients have the right to withdraw and withhold life-sustaining interventions when burdens exceed benefits, this consensus arose prior to the widespread use of MCS technology and is not uniformly accepted in these cases. There are unique ethical and clinical considerations regarding MCS deactivation. Our center recently encountered the challenge of an awake and functionally improving patient with a total artificial heart (TAH) who requested its deactivation. We present a narrative description of this case with discussion of the following questions: (1) Is it ethically permissible to deactivate this particular device, the TAH? (2) Are there any particular factors in this case that are ethical contraindications to proceeding with deactivation? (3) What are the specific processes necessary to ensure a compassionate and respectful deactivation? (4) What proactive practices could have been implemented to lessen the intensity of this case's challenges? We close with a list of recommendations for managing similar cases.

Mechanical circulatory support: New advances, new pumps, new ideas

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is a viable therapy for severe end-stage heart disease. Most obstacles to long-term MCS therapy have been overcome, and a number of clinical trials, including the recent REMATCH trial, have shown a clear benefit in terms of survival and improved quality of life. MCS should therefore no longer be considered as simply a temporary bridge to other therapies, but also a destination therapy whose potential should continue to expand through the development and use of newer, more innovative devices such as continuous flow pumps, next-generation centrifugal pumps, and total artificial hearts. The homebound heart failure patient and the patient facing imminent death from massive myocardial infarction receive little statistical benefit from current therapies, and the new and evolving MCS technologies offer the potential for effective therapy to these desperately ill patients. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Blood pumps: technologies and markets in transformation.

The heart failure industry or sector of blood pump technologies comprised of scientists, medicine, and business has inadequate attention from the financial community due to the perception of unmet market potential and regulatory hurdles. There are more than 20 mechanical circulatory support technologies currently in some stage of development. The application is defined initially for emerging technologies as bridge-to-transplant whereas more mature devices have focused on bridge-to-recovery and alternative-to-transplant. Regulatory hurdles and financing resources have dictated this initial application strategy. Whether a technology has valves, bearings, is magnetically suspended, acts as a pressure cuff, and so on, the future will belong in large part to those technologies that are less expensive, have improved ergonomics, are simpler in surgical application, and can demonstrate efficacy levels that are an improvement over today's approved devices. Today's devices have provided a valuable platform for the emerging technologies. However, there has been little market expansion over these past years, relative to the potential market. The cardiologist is the patient's gatekeeper, and drugs appear to be the therapy of choice as options are considered. Technologies without a business model will have a difficult time attracting much needed funding, the result being protracted development times or project termination. MicroMed has modified its ventricular assist device (VAD) focus, with a broader look at treating the heart failure patient. MicroMed recently entered into an agreement with Chrysalis Biotechnology, Inc., Galveston, TX, covering a synthetic peptide technology (Chrysalin) that when injected into tissue has demonstrated an angiogenic effect without the concerns inherent in recombinant angiogenic/growth factors. We believe a combination therapy of the DeBakey VAD-synthetic peptide could provide sufficient revascularization for bridge-to-recovery or as an alternative-to-transplant in certain patients.

Prolonged LVAD Support Remains Problematic.

Mechanical circulatory support technology has improved rapidly during the past decade, with a shift in emphasis away from the artificial heart and