liar to Fatigue Deformation, Acta Metallurgica, Vol. 11, No. 7, July 1963, p. 643. 3 Sinclair, G. M., Proceedings of American Society for Test Material, Vol. 52, 1952, p. 743. 4 on the Role of Substructure in the Mechanical Behavior of Metals, ASD-TDR 63-324, April 1963, Air Systems Div., pp. 1-22. 5 Zirinsky, S., Switsky, H., and Kenger, A., Utilization of an Ultrasonic Fatigue Damage Indicator for Inspection and Design, 1966 Symposium for Reliability, Nov. 1966, Los Angeles, Calif. 6 Cory, G. et al., of Latent Fatigue Damage in Metals and Alloys/' Contract NOw 59-1202-C, June 1960, Southwest Research Institute. 7 Kunsenberger, F. et al., of Test Device for Study of Fatigue Damage, Contract NOw 61-0685-C, June 1962, Southwest Research Institute. 8 Kusenberger, F. and Barton, Substantiation of Fatigue Detection Capability, Contract N600 (19)-59307, June 1963, Southwest Research Institute. 9 Kusenberger, F. et al., Non-Destructive Evaluation of Metal Fatigue, AF 49(638)-1352, March 1965, AD61985, Southwest Research Institute. 10 Kusenberger, F. et al., Non-Destructive Evaluation of Metal Fatigue, AF 49(638)-1502, March 1966, Southwest Research Institute. 11 Harting, D. The S/N Fatigue Life Gage: Direct Means for Measuring Cumulative Fatigue Damage, Experimental Mechanics, Feb. 1966. 12 Brosius, H. et al., of Fatigue Damage with Rayleigh Waves, TR 60-307, Aug. 1960, Aeronautical Research Laboratory. 13 Truell, R. et al., The Use of Ultrasonic Methods to Determine Fatigue Effects in Metals, TR59-389, Nov. 1959, Wright Air Development Center. 14 Rasmussen, J. G., Prediction of Fatigue Failure Using Ultrasonic Surface Waves, Reprint 901, Krautkramer Ultrasonics Inc. 15 Hardrath, H. F., A Review of Fatigue Research in the United States, TM-X-56562, NASA.
Read full abstract