Although it has been a profound source of controversy in the past,1 it is now generally recognized that females are as physically aggressive as are their male counterparts.2 – 3 The prevalence of female-to-male intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration has been found to be similar to, if not greater than, that of male-to-female IPV perpetration, with the most common form of IPV being bi-directional in nature.2 , 4 Many states have implemented mandatory arrest laws for domestic violence in which all parties found to be involved in the perpetration of IPV, including women, must be arrested when authorities arrive at a violent scene.5 Often, these individuals are further mandated to attend batter intervention programs (BIPs). Unfortunately, there is still very little known regarding women's use of IPV, and even less is known about women court-mandated to BIPs. Further, while there is a large body of research showing a strong association between alcohol use and violent behavior,6 alcohol use and gambling,7 – 10 and violent behavior and gambling,11 –13 very little is known regarding the co-occurrence of all three of these variables. This is especially true of women who have been found to be intimately violent. Understanding the poly-morbid relationship between these three behaviors is an important step toward improving the effectiveness of BIPs, so that the constellation of issues relevant for these women can be more adequately addressed, which could have substantial implications for public health and policy. The aim of the current study was to address this gap. The sample of women used in the current analyses comes from a larger study of women in Rhode Island court-mandated to BIPs, described previously in this journal.14 For the purposes of the current study, a total of 92 women who completed measures of gambling, alcohol use, and IPV were utilized. Females' gambling behavior was assessed with the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).15 Consistent with the published scoring protocol for the SOGS, hazardous gambling was defined as a cut score of five or greater, and problem gambling was defined as a score between one and four. Alcohol use was assessed with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT).16 Hazardous drinking was defined as meeting one or more of the following three criteria: scoring eight or higher on the AUDIT; drinking four or more drinks on one occasion on a monthly or more frequent basis; or being intoxicated on a monthly or more frequent basis. Finally, perpetration of IPV was assessed with the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2).17 Specifically, perpetration of psychological abuse, physical abuse, and sexual coercion were examined.