Meaningful Survival Research Articles

Nivolumab (NIVO) plus chemotherapy (chemo) or ipilimumab (IPI) vs chemo as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): 29-month (mo) follow-up from CheckMate 648.

290 Background: NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) vs chemo in CheckMate 648 (NCT03143153), leading to approvals in the US, EU, Japan, and other countries. We report longer follow-up results. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC were randomized to NIVO (240 mg Q2W) + chemo (fluorouracil + cisplatin Q4W), NIVO (3 mg/kg Q2W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q6W) or chemo. Primary endpoints were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent central review (BICR). Hierarchical testing was done first in patients (pts) with tumor cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 1%, then in all randomized pts. Results: 970 pts were randomized to NIVO + chemo, NIVO + IPI, or chemo. With 29-mo minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI continued to show improvement in OS vs chemo, including higher 24-mo OS rates, in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% and all randomized pts. Responses were more durable and a larger proportion of responders had a duration of response (DOR) ≥ 24 mo with NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI vs chemo in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% (22%, 36%, 13%, respectively) and all randomized pts (21%, 29%, 13%). Additional efficacy data by PD-L1 status will be presented. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 96% (grade 3/4, 49%) of pts with NIVO + chemo, 80% (33%) with NIVO + IPI, and 90% (36%) with chemo. Any-grade TRAEs leading to discontinuation occurred in 35% of pts with NIVO + chemo, 19% with NIVO + IPI, and 21% with chemo. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 2% of pts in each arm. Conclusions: NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful survival benefit vs chemo, durable objective responses, and acceptable safety profiles with longer follow-up. This further supports each regimen as a new 1L treatment option for advanced ESCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03143153 . [Table: see text]

First-line (1L) nivolumab (NIVO) plus chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC/EAC): CheckMate 649 Chinese subgroup analysis with 3-year follow-up.

353 Background: NIVO + chemo demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) and an acceptable safety profile vs chemo in previously untreated Chinese pts from CheckMate 649, consistent with the overall study population with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC. Results from CheckMate 649 led to approval of 1L NIVO + chemo in multiple countries, including China. We report 3-year follow-up results in Chinese pts. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced or metastatic, non-HER2-positive GC/GEJC/EAC were enrolled regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Randomized pts received NIVO (360 mg Q3W or 240 mg Q2W) + chemo (XELOX Q3W or FOLFOX Q2W), NIVO + ipilimumab, or chemo. Dual primary endpoints for NIVO + chemo vs chemo were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) in pts with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5. Results: 208 Chinese pts were randomized to NIVO + chemo or chemo. At 37 month (mo) minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvement in OS and PFS vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and in all randomized pts. The 36-mo OS rate was 31% with NIVO + chemo vs 11% with chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and 26% vs 9% in all randomized pts, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) (95% CI) per BICR in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 who had measurable lesions at baseline was 68% (56-79) with NIVO + chemo and 48% (36-60) with chemo, and in all randomized patients was 66% (55-76) and 45% (35-56), respectively. Responses were more durable with NIVO + chemo vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5, with median duration of response (mDOR) (95% CI) of 12.5 mo (7.2-23.4) vs 6.9 mo (3.9-8.5); in all randomized pts, mDOR was 12.5 mo (7.2-17.7) vs 5.6 mo (4.4-8.3), respectively. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: After 3 years of follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful survival benefit and durable objective responses vs chemo in Chinese pts, with an acceptable safety profile, consistent with the overall study population with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC. These results further support NIVO + chemo as a 1L treatment option for Chinese pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116 . [Table: see text]

Modeling of intracranial tumor treating fields for the treatment of complex high-grade gliomas

Increasing the intensity of tumor treating fields (TTF) within a tumor bed improves clinical efficacy, but reaching sufficiently high field intensities to achieve growth arrest remains challenging due in part to the insulating nature of the cranium. Using MRI-derived finite element models (FEMs) and simulations, we optimized an exhaustive set of intracranial electrode locations to obtain maximum TTF intensities in three clinically challenging high-grade glioma (HGG) cases (i.e., thalamic, left temporal, brainstem). Electric field strengths were converted into therapeutic enhancement ratios (TER) to evaluate the predicted impact of stimulation on tumor growth. Concurrently, conventional transcranial configurations were simulated/optimized for comparison. Optimized intracranial TTF were able to achieve field strengths that have previously been shown capable of inducing complete growth arrest, in 98–100% of the tumor volumes using only 0.54–0.64 A current. The reconceptualization of TTF as a targeted, intracranial therapy has the potential to provide a meaningful survival benefit to patients with HGG and other brain tumors, including those in surgically challenging, deep, or anatomically eloquent locations which may preclude surgical resection. Accordingly, such an approach may ultimately represent a paradigm shift in the use of TTFs for the treatment of brain cancer.

First-line Immunotherapy and Clinically Meaningful Survival Benefits for the Oldest Adults With Lung Cancer

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA Oncology HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcast Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA Oncology journal

Pembrolizumab for first-line treatment of advanced unresectable or metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the seventh most common malignancy worldwide. Although systemic chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced EC, the available cytotoxic agents have limited efficacy. Pembrolizumab, a humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin G4 antibody that inhibits programmed cell death protein 1, has recently been developed for the treatment of patients with advanced EC. In the KEYNOTE-181 trial, pembrolizumab achieved a clinical meaningful overall survival benefit over chemotherapy alone when used as second-line treatment in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who had a combined positive score ⩾10 for expression of programmed death ligand 1. Furthermore, KEYNOTE-590 showed that pembrolizumab + chemotherapy was more effective than chemotherapy alone as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced EC. Accordingly, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) chemotherapy has become the standard first-line treatment for advanced EC. The use of ICIs in primary therapy has helped to improve the prognosis, especially for ESCC. Moreover, in CheckMate 577, patients who received postoperative nivolumab therapy had a reduced risk of recurrence, and the ability of preoperative ICI chemotherapy to reduce the incidence of recurrence is now under investigation. This review outlines the evidence for use of pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for advanced unresectable or metastatic EC, summarizes the ongoing research on ICI combination chemotherapy, and discusses the associated issues.

Prognostic relevance of pre-treatment inflammatory biomarkers along with other clinicopathological and treatment factors in oral cavity cancers.

Inflammation has traditionally been considered to be one of the hallmarks of cancer, and systemic inflammatory responses have a prognostic value in many solid cancers. The use of inflammation-based prognostic markers along with traditional clinicopathological prognostic markers in oral cavity cancers has not been studied well. This is a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database of patients with oral cancers who were managed in a regional cancer center in south India. The study included patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity who were treated with curative intent from January to December 2016. Three hundred sixty-one patients met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. The median age of our patient cohort was 45 years; the male-to-female ratio was 3.7:1. All of the patients underwent curative treatments after a multi-disciplinary board concurrence. Advanced T stage, patients with buccal mucosal cancers and patients who received upfront non-surgical treatments have poorer survival outcomes. The clinicopathological variables that predicted a poorer overall survival in the cohort of patients treated with upfront surgery were advanced T Stage, higher grade, presence of perineural invasion, a higher inflammatory maker, and combination of platelet and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (COP-NLR). Our unique study of oral cavity cancer patients with a primary aim of exploring the prognostic significance of the pre-treatment inflammatory markers gave very interesting results. The prognostic significance of COP-NLR and other inflammatory markers in oral cancers need to be further explored. More importantly, our study has clearly reiterated that meaningful long-term survival outcomes in oral cavity cancers can only be achieved with the incorporation of upfront surgery.

Post-resuscitation care of patients with return of spontaneous circulation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest at the emergency department.

Out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) is a major public health challenge and post-return-of-spontaneous-circulation (ROSC) goals have shifted from just survival to survival with intact neurology. Although post-ROSC care is crucial for survival with intact neurology, there are insufficient well-established protocols for post-resuscitation care. We aimed to evaluate post-resuscitation care in the emergency department (ED) of adult (aged ≥16 years) OHCA patients with sustained ROSC and its associated neurologically intact survival. A retrospective review of electronic medical records was conducted for OHCA patients with sustained ROSC at the ED. Data including demographics, pre-hospital resuscitation, ED resuscitation, post-resuscitation care and eventual outcomes were analysed. Among 921 OHCA patients, 85 (9.2%) had sustained ROSC at the ED. Nineteen patients (19/85, 22.4%) survived, with 13 (13/85, 15.3%) having intact neurology at discharge. Electrocardiogram and chest X-ray were performed in all OHCA patients, whereas computed tomography (CT) was performed inconsistently, with CT brain being most common (74/85, 87.1%), while CT pulmonary angiogram (6/85, 7.1%), abdomen and pelvis (4/85, 4.7%) and aortogram (2/85, 2.4%) were done infrequently. Only four patients (4.7%) had all five neuroprotective goals of normoxia, normocarbia, normotension, normothermia and normoglycaemia achieved in the ED. The proportion of all five neuroprotective goals being met was significantly higher (P = 0.01) among those with neurologically intact survival (3/13, 23.1%) than those without (1/72, 1.4%). Post-resuscitation care at the ED showed great variability, indicating gaps between recommended guidelines and clinical practice. Good quality post-resuscitation care, centred around neuroprotection goals, must be initiated promptly to achieve meaningful survival with intact neurology.

Isatuximab Plus Pomalidomide/Low-Dose Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide/Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (ICARIA-MM): Characterization of Subsequent Antimyeloma Therapies

Introduction: Based on the primary analysis of the Phase 3 ICARIA-MM study (NCT02990338), isatuximab (Isa), an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, is approved in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) in several countries for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received at least 2 prior treatments, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor. Here, we describe updated, longer-term efficacy data following subsequent therapy. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to Isa-Pd (n=154) or Pd (n=153), with stratification by age (<75 vs ≥75) and number of prior lines (2-3 versus more than >3). Isa 10 mg/kg was administered weekly for the first 4-week cycle and every 2 weeks thereafter. In each cycle, both treatment arms received pomalidomide 4 mg (days 1-21) and weekly dexamethasone 40 mg (days 1, 8, 15, and 22). Treatment was given until progressive disease, unacceptable adverse events, or patient choice. The final overall survival analysis was planned when 220 death events occurred. Results: As of March 14, 2022, 16 (10.4%) patients receiving Isa-Pd and 3 (2.0%) patients receiving Pd were still on treatment; 101 (65.6%) and 117 (76.5%) patients, respectively, discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. Median treatment duration was longer with Isa-Pd vs Pd (47.6 vs 24.0 weeks). After a median 52.4 months of follow-up, a clinically meaningful overall survival (OS) benefit was observed in favor of Isa-Pd vs Pd after 220 events (Jan 27, 2022; median: 24.6 vs 17.7 months; hazard ratio 0.776 [95% CI: 0.594-1.1015]; one-sided P=0.0319; significance level: P=0.02). Further antimyeloma treatment was given to 102 (66.2%) patients receiving Isa-Pd and 119 (77.8%) patients receiving Pd (regardless of the reason for treatment discontinuation in both arms), with a median of 2 and 1 further regimens, respectively. Of the patients receiving subsequent therapy, 22.5% (23/102) in the Isa-Pd arm and 59.7% (71/119) in the Pd arm received daratumumab. The most common further antimyeloma treatments for patients in the Isa-Pd arm were corticosteroids (n=88/102; 86.3%), alkylating agents (n=71/102; 69.6%), and proteasome inhibitors (n=70/102; 68.6%); the most common treatment received in the first subsequent line was a proteasome inhibitor (n=54/102; 52.9%). The most common further antimyeloma treatments for patients in the Pd arm were corticosteroids (n=94/119; 79.0%), monoclonal antibodies (n=75/119; 63.0%), and proteasome inhibitors (n=69/119; 58.0%); the most common treatment received in the first subsequent line was daratumumab (n=52/119; 43.7%). The overall response rate (ORR) for the first subsequent line of therapy was 28.8% (23/80) for the Isa-Pd arm and 35.3% (30/85) for the Pd arm. The ORR for patients receiving daratumumab-based regimens as the first subsequent line was 25.0% (2/8) for the Isa-Pd arm and 40.5% (17/42) for the Pd arm. The ORR for patients receiving daratumumab as monotherapy or with steroids in any subsequent line was 12.5% (1/8) for the Isa-Pd arm and 36.7% (11/30) for the Pd arm. The ORR for patients receiving daratumumab in combination with immunomodulatory agents, alkylating agents, or proteasome inhibitors in any subsequent line was 28.6% (4/14) for the Isa-Pd arm and 44.8% (13/29) for the Pd arm. Progression-free survival (PFS) on first subsequent line for patients receiving daratumumab was 2.2 months for the Isa-Pd arm and 5.7 months for the Pd arm. PFS on first subsequent line for patients receiving treatment excluding daratumumab was 4.6 months for the Isa-Pd arm and 5.2 months for the Pd arm. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates that the majority of patients with RRMM require multiple lines of subsequent therapy, even after receiving a triplet combination that includes a monoclonal antibody. The immediate use of an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody with currently available combinations appears to be less effective in the Isa-Pd arm. The more frequent use of subsequent daratumumab in Pd (59.7%) compared with Isa-Pd (22.5%) may have affected the power to detect statistically significant OS given the sample size, as well as reflecting the efficacy of this approach in the management of RRMM. Funding: Sanofi.

296P Osimertinib as adjuvant therapy in patients (pts) with resected EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Updated results from ADAURA

Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that potently and selectively inhibits EGFR-TKI sensitising and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. It has efficacy in EGFRm NSCLC, including in central nervous system (CNS) metastases. In the Phase III ADAURA (NCT02511106) primary analysis adjuvant osimertinib showed a significant and clinically meaningful disease-free survival (DFS) benefit vs placebo (PBO) in pts with completely resected EGFRm (ex19del/L858R) NSCLC, ± adjuvant chemotherapy (CT): stage IIꟷIIIA DFS HR, 0.17; 99.06% CI, 0.11, 0.26; p<0.0001; stage IBꟷIIIA DFS HR, 0.20; 99.12% CI 0.14, 0.30; p<0.0001.

S3700 Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Recurrent Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer

Introduction: Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer related deaths worldwide. Majority of cases are sporadic although 10% demonstrate familial clustering, of which 1-3% arise from inherited cancer syndromes. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer is a rare cancer caused by CDH1 genetic mutation, inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. Immunotherapy has been shown to increase overall response rates in gastrointestinal cancers especially in those subgroups with DNA mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite-instable tumors. We herein, present a case of recurrent hereditary diffuse gastric cancer with good response to chemoimmunotherapy. Case Description/Methods: This is a 41-year-old asian female with past medical history of stage IIB signet ring type gastric cancer diagnosed 12 years ago, status post subtotal gastrectomy with a block transverse colectomy followed by concurrent chemoradiation, who presented with disease recurrence after 10 years, when she was treated with neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Her genetic screening showed CDH1 mutation, with high risk for breast and gastric cancers. She was monitored closely with regular breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). During one of her regular endoscopy assessments recently, she was found to have erythema of her gastric mucosa which upon biopsy confirmed recurrence of her poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, diffuse type with signet ring features. She underwent treatment with oxaliplatin based chemotherapy combined with Nivolumab for six cycles. She responded well to chemoimmunotherapy as evidenced by positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET CT) scan and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). She is awaiting surgical resection followed by adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy either alone or in combination with immunotherapy. Discussion: Gastrectomy and chemotherapy are the mainstay treatments for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. Nivolumab has been shown to be effective in heavily pretreated gastric cancers. The combination therapy of nivolumab plus chemotherapy achieved a clinically meaningful overall survival benefit in the first line setting in all advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Clinical trials and research encompassing antibody treatments, such as targeted anti-PD1 antibodies, are ongoing and could offer additional treatment options in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Latest in Resuscitation Research: Highlights From the 2021 American Heart Association's Resuscitation Science Symposium.

Latest in Resuscitation Research: Highlights From the 2021 American Heart Association's Resuscitation Science Symposium.

P17.05.A Re-irradiation with bevacizumab for large volume chemo-refractory glioblastoma after prior high-dose chemoradiotherapy

Abstract Background There are limited options for salvage treatment of glioblastoma. The role of re-irradiation (reRT) for large-volume chemo-refractory relapse is not established due to concerns regarding potential toxicity, which may be overcome with use of bevacizumab. Material and Methods Patients who received initial post-operative chemoradiotherapy with 60Gy (EORTC-NCIC protocol) for glioblastoma across two centres from 2007-2021 were entered into a prospective database. Patients with progressive chemo-refractory disease, including some progressing on bevacizumab, were considered for reRT. Pseudoprogression and late RT necrosis was actively excluded using sequential MRI and PET. Clinico-pathologic characteristics of the reRT cohort and patients who had progressed but did not undergo reRT were compared. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from diagnosis in the overall and reRT cohorts as well as OS post-reRT. Factors associated with improved survival post-reRT were assessed. Results Of 447 patients treated for glioblastoma, 372 had progressed of which 71 received reRT. Median follow up for surviving patients was 26 and 37 months from diagnosis for the reRT and overall cohorts respectively. Median PFS and OS from initial diagnosis were 11.6 (95% CI: 9.4-14.2) and 23.6 (95% CI: 21.0-33.1) months respectively for re-RT patients, compared to 11.8 (95% CI: 11.0-12.5) and 18.0 (95% CI 17.0-19.1) months for the overall cohort. The reRT subgroup were more likely to be younger (median 53 vs. 59 years, p&amp;lt;0.001), have ECOG performance status at diagnosis 0-1 (86% vs. 69%, p=0.002) and have MGMT promoter methylation (54% vs. 40% p=0.083). There was no difference in extent of initial resection (p=0.59). The most common reRT schedule was 15 fractions to a total dose of either 40 Gy (32 patients) or 35 Gy (28 patients). Sixty (85%) had progression on bevacizumab prior to reRT; bevacizumab was continued during reRT in these cases. A further 10 (14%) received salvage bevacizumab after reRT. Median reRT PTV volume was 135cc (IQR 69-207cc). Median OS following reRT was 7.1 months (95% CI: 6.3-7.9). Six (8%) patients were admitted to hospital within 30 days of reRT, only one due to reRT toxicity. Median OS post-reRT was 7.7, 6.4 and 6.0 months for patients aged &amp;lt;50, 50-70 and &amp;gt;70 years respectively (p=0.021) and 8.1 vs. 6.3 months for patients with ECOG performance status of 0-1 and 2-3 respectively (p=0.039). Distant versus local progression (p=0.87), anatomical location of disease (p=0.65), MGMT methylation status (p=0.77) and PTV volume (p=0.91) did not predict post-reRT survival. Conclusion Large volume reRT for patients with recurrent glioblastoma is feasible, well-tolerated, associated with favourable overall survival and produces meaningful post-radiotherapy survival times.

The clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of young patients with chondrosarcoma of bone.

PurposeClinicopathologic characteristics and treatment outcomes for young patients (less than 40 years) with chondrosarcoma of bone are rarely documented. The purpose of this study is to determine the clinicopathological characteristics and identify the survival predictors for this rare population.Patients and MethodsWe used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify young patients with chondrosarcoma of bone between 1973 and 2016. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the independent risk factors. Kaplan-Meier method was used to intuitively show the survival difference stratified by different treatments.ResultsA total of 1312 eligible young patients with chondrosarcoma of bone were analyzed this study. The mean age at diagnosis was 28.5 ± 0.2 years old (ranging from 1 to 40 years). 51.1% of cases were located in the extremity. More than two-thirds of patients (71.4%) were high grade. The majority of the patients (92.0%) received surgery, only 11.8% of patients received radiotherapy, and only 10.4% of patients received chemotherapy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates of this cohort were 88.5% and 89.1%, respectively. According to the results of multivariate analysis, nine variables were significantly correlated with OS and CSS, including gender, year of diagnosis, tumor site, tumor grade, tumor subtype, distant metastasis, tumor size, surgery, and chemotherapy.ConclusionYoung patients with chondrosarcoma of bone experienced better prognosis. Surgery was significantly correlated with increased survival, while chemotherapy was significantly correlated with decreased survival. Radiotherapy was not a meaningful survival predictor of young patients with chondrosarcoma of bone. Prospective clinical trials are needed in the future to determine the effect of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on prognosis of those patients.

LBA47 Osimertinib as adjuvant therapy in patients (pts) with resected EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Updated results from ADAURA

Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that potently and selectively inhibits EGFR-TKI sensitising and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. It has efficacy in EGFRm NSCLC, including in central nervous system (CNS) metastases. In the Phase III ADAURA (NCT02511106) primary analysis adjuvant osimertinib showed a significant and clinically meaningful disease-free survival (DFS) benefit vs placebo (PBO) in pts with completely resected EGFRm (ex19del/L858R) NSCLC, ± adjuvant chemotherapy (CT): stage IIꟷIIIA DFS HR, 0.17; 99.06% CI, 0.11, 0.26; p<0.0001; stage IBꟷIIIA DFS HR, 0.20; 99.12% CI 0.14, 0.30; p<0.0001. We report updated exploratory analyses of DFS and recurrence patterns after 2 yrs added follow up. Eligible pts (aged ≥18 yrs [≥20 in Japan/Taiwan], WHO PS 0/1, completely resected EGFRm stage IBꟷIIIA [AJCC 7th edition] NSCLC; adjuvant CT allowed) were randomised 1:1 to osimertinib 80 mg once daily or PBO for up to 3 yrs. Primary endpoint: investigator-assessed DFS in stage IIꟷIIIA. Secondary endpoints: DFS in stage IBꟷIIIA, overall survival and safety. Patterns of recurrence and CNS DFS were pre-specified exploratory endpoints. Data cut-off: 11 April 2022. Globally, 682 pts were randomised; osimertinib n=339, PBO n=343. In this updated analysis, in pts with stage IIꟷIIIA disease DFS HR was 0.23 (95% CI 0.18, 0.30; 242/470 events; 51% maturity); 3-yr DFS rate was 84% with osimertinib vs 34% with PBO. In the overall population (stage IBꟷIIIA) DFS HR was 0.27 (95% CI 0.21, 0.34; 305/682 events); 3-yr DFS rate was 85% with osimertinib vs 44% with PBO. In the osimertinib arm, fewer pts experienced local/regional and distant recurrence vs PBO. CNS DFS HR was 0.24 (95% CI 0.14, 0.42; 63/470 events) in stage IIꟷIIIA. The long-term safety profile remains consistent with the known profile of osimertinib. With 2 yrs further follow-up, a continued DFS benefit was sustained with osimertinib vs PBO, consistent with the primary analysis. These mature data reinforce adjuvant osimertinib as standard of care for pts with EGFRm stage IB–‍IIIA NSCLC after complete tumour resection and adjuvant CT, when indicated.

Impact of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone therapy on overall survival in multiple myeloma patients: Analysis of the emerging-markets subgroup of the TOURMALINE-MM1 trial.

Ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib-Rd) showed clinical efficacy over placebo-Rd in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) in the TOURMALINE-MM1 trial. Over a median follow-up of ∼85months, as patients showed disease progression, they received subsequent novel therapies that confounded the overall survival (OS) benefit. Here, we conducted a post hoc analysis in 148 patients from seven countries defined as emerging markets, with limited access to novel therapies for MM during the trial period, to describe the impact of these therapies on OS. Patients were randomised to ixazomib-Rd (n = 71) or placebo-Rd (n = 77). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.7 versus 10.2months, with ixazomib-Rd versus placebo-Rd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.504; p = 0.008) demonstrating a statistically significant improvement as observed in the primary trial. The median OS improved by 32.6months with ixazomib-Rd over placebo-Rd (63.5 vs. 30.9months; HR, 0.794; p = 0.261); however, the statistically significant benefit seen in PFS was not observed for OS. Improvement with ixazomib-Rd over placebo-Rd was observed in overall response (81.7% vs. 64.9%; odds ratio [OR], 2.38; p = 0.019) and complete response (22.5% vs. 3.9%; OR, 7.57; p < 0.001). Patient-reported quality of life and use of subsequent therapies were similar across treatment groups. No new safety concerns were identified. Compared with the main cohort, median OS was 10months longer with ixazomib-Rd and 21months shorter with placebo-Rd in this subgroup, indicating a clinically meaningful survival benefit of ixazomib-Rd treatment in this patient population with limited access to subsequent novel therapies.

Hepatic Events and Viral Kinetics in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab

Introduction: In the Phase 3 IMbrave150 trial (NCT03434379), atezolizumab + bevacizumab demonstrated a clinically meaningful survival benefit over sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including those with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We used IMbrave150 data to investigate the safety and risk of viral reactivation or flare in infected patients treated with atezolizumab + bevacizumab or sorafenib. Methods: Patients with unresectable HCC not previously treated with systemic therapy were randomized 2:1 to atezolizumab + bevacizumab or sorafenib. In this exploratory analysis, safety was continually evaluated, including for hepatic adverse events. Patients were monitored for HBV and HCV reactivation and flare at screening, the beginning of Cycles 5 and 9, and at treatment discontinuation. Results: Of 501 enrolled patients, 485 were included in the safety population; 329 (68%) received atezolizumab + bevacizumab, and 156 (32%) received sorafenib. Overall, 150 (31%) and 58 (12%) patients had HBV and HCV infections, respectively. The safety profiles of atezolizumab + bevacizumab and sorafenib were consistent across patients, regardless of viral infection. Overall, hepatic serious adverse events occurred in 11% of patients receiving atezolizumab + bevacizumab and 8% receiving sorafenib. HBV or HCV reactivation occurred in 2% or 16% of atezolizumab + bevacizumab-treated patients, respectively, versus 7% or 14% with sorafenib. There were no instances of hepatitis flare with atezolizumab + bevacizumab. Conclusions: Atezolizumab + bevacizumab had a similar hepatic safety profile in patients with and without HBV or HCV infection. Viral reactivation rates were similar between arms. Overall, these data support the use of atezolizumab + bevacizumab in patients with HCC and HBV or HCV infection without any special precaution.

Real-world clinical outcomes with avelumab in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma treated in the USA: a multicenter chart review study

BackgroundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive, cutaneous neuroendocrine neoplasm with annual incidence rates of 0.13–1.6 cases/100,000/year worldwide as of 2018. Chemotherapy for metastatic MCC (mMCC) has high objective...

Repeat laser interstitial thermal therapy for recurrent primary and metastatic intracranial tumors.

Background: Repeat craniotomy in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors carries significant morbidity and can delay adjuvant treatments. Repeat laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for recurrent disease has been described and could benefit patients with limited cytoreductive options. We aim to describe the indications, safety, and efficacy of repeat LITT for recurrent primary and metastatic intracranial tumors.Methods: Patients undergoing repeat ablations for the same lesion were included in the study. We retrospectively analyzed 13 patients treated with 29 total LITT ablations.Results: Eleven patients were treated for glioblastoma (GBM), while two had brain metastases. Eleven patients had LITT performed only 2 times, while three patients underwent three total iterations of LITT for disease recurrence. Median length of stay after the 1st ablation was 2 days, while the median length of stay after the 2nd ablation was 1 day. The median time to resuming adjuvant treatments after the 1st LITT was 11 days. The median time to resuming adjuvant treatments after the 2nd LITT was 28 days. Four patients after the 1st and 2nd LITT sustained deficits persisting through 30-day follow-up. The median progression-free survival among the GBM patients from the first ablation was 6.0 months, 3.2 months from the 2nd ablation, and 2.1 months from the 3rd ablation.Conclusion: Recurrent tumors, especially GBM, can be safely treated using repeat LITT when surgery cannot be effectively performed. Our results indicate that patients tolerate the procedure well and have a meaningful survival given the salvage nature of the procedure.

Second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Time for more individualized treatment options?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequently diagnosed primary tumor of the liver and is usually detected as advanced disease. It is an aggressive disease that often progresses rapidly when it fails to respond to treatment. As such, patients have limited opportunities to try different subsequent-line treatment regimens. In the last 5 years, the number of agents and/or regimens available for the treatment of advanced HCC has significantly increased, which has made treatment choices for this patient population increasingly complex. In the second-line setting, several phase III trials of regorafenib (RESORCE), ramucirumab (REACH/REACH-2), and cabozantinib (CELESTIAL) have demonstrated clinically meaningful survival benefits in patients with the disease. However, the median overall survival of patients with advanced HCC remains unchanged at approximately 12 mo from the start of systemic second-line therapy, with a limited duration of response. Evidence from the REACH/REACH-2 trials demonstrated for the first time that baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels can be used as an identification factor to select those who are likely to benefit the most from ramucirumab treatment. Ramucirumab is both well tolerated and efficacious and has a clinically acceptable safety profile. Therefore, it should be considered an option for patients with AFP levels ≥ 400 ng/mL.

Updated overall survival outcomes in ENZAMET (ANZUP 1304), an international, cooperative group trial of enzalutamide in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).

LBA5004 Background: The first planned interim analysis of ENZAMET, with 243 deaths after a median follow-up of 34 months, revealed a clinically meaningful overall survival benefit in mHSPC with the addition of enzalutamide to standard of care (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.86, p=0.002, Davis et al, NEJM 2019). We now present updated overall survival (OS) findings from the prespecified analysis triggered to occur after 470 deaths. Methods: We randomly assigned participants (pts) with mHSPC to treatment with testosterone suppression (TS) plus either a conventional non-steroidal anti-androgen (NSAA) or enzalutamide. Stratification factors included age, volume of disease (high vs low according to the CHAARTED definition), and planned use of concurrent docetaxel assigned by the treating physician (docetaxel yes vs no). Results: We randomized 1125 pts with a median age of 69 years, including 503 in the docetaxel stratum, and 602 with high volume metastatic disease. OS results in the table below are based on 476 deaths, a median follow-up of 68 months, and a cut-off date of 19JAN2022. The hazard rate for death was 30% lower among all those assigned enzalutamide versus control (p&lt;0.0001). Outcomes by volume status are shown (Table) as well as the subgroups of interest with M1 high or low volume disease at diagnosis selected for concurrent docetaxel. Conclusions: Enzalutamide added to TS, compared with an active comparator of NSAA, provided clinically meaningful improvements in OS for the combined overall cohort, which persisted with an additional 3 years of follow-up. The benefits were more pronounced in pts with low volume disease, and were also seen in the subgroup with M1 high volume mHSPC despite the relatively high survival with TS+docetaxel+NSAA. ENZAMET was led by ANZUP Cancer Trials Group and the University of Sydney NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, with funding support from Astellas. Clinical trial information: NCT02446405. [Table: see text]