Meaningful Scores Research Articles

Comparing two psychometric approaches: The case of item analysis for a classroom test in mathematics

Multiple-choice and constructed-response item formats are widely used in Philippine classrooms where tests are primarily summative. Conducting item analysis provides teachers the professional possibility to independently improve their test items while also allowing them to make informed decisions about test improvement and ensure that their assessments provide meaningful scores. Comparisons of item analysis approaches have been extensively used in standardized tests but not so much in small-scale testing such as classroom assessments. Hence, this research reports an empirical study where a summative test for classroom use is analyzed using psychometric techniques from the Classical Test Theory (CTT) and the Item Response Theory (IRT). This study employs an action research design where the primary author being a teaching practitioner-researcher, reports how an item analysis of his teacher-made summative test was conducted to improve the test items. Results from this study show that interpretations of the item parameter estimates from both psychometric approaches, CTT and IRT agree on most of the recommendations for the items. The items where the two approaches provide contrasting recommendations call for a further qualitative evaluation of the flagged items putting the teacher in a judicious position to discern which recommendations to follow regarding the concerned items. In the context of this study, an example of a guiding insight in deciding would be reflecting on the learning objectives measured by the test and the context in which the test was created.

An Implicit Solvation Model for Binding Free Energy Estimation in Nonaqueous Solution.

Implicit solvation models permit the approximate description of solute-solvent interactions, where water is the most often considered solvent due to its relevance in biological systems. The use of other solvents is less common but is relevant for applications such as in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or chromatography. As an example, chloroform is commonly used in anisotropic NMR to measure residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) of chiral analytes weakly aligned by an alignment medium. They can be calculated from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with explicit solvent, but it is computationally expensive, because tens of microseconds-long MD trajectories should be collected. Here, we develop a computational protocol and numerical implementation for binding free energies of rigid organic molecules to poly-γ-benzyl-l-glutamate using an implicit solvation model of chloroform. The model parameters are fit to alchemical binding free energies obtained from MD simulations in explicit chloroform and compared to the MD results and another implicit solvation model. Possible applications of the method are docking or Monte Carlo simulations based on a physically meaningful scoring function for the fast prediction of interaction poses of ligands for selective binding or the alignment of analytes.

Clinically Meaningful Change Estimates for the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema.

To derive estimates of clinically meaningful change (improvement) on the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEIVFQ-25) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) using anchor- and distribution-based methods. In this exploratory post hoc analysis of data from the RIDE/RISE (NCT00473382/NCT00473330) clinical trials of ranibizumab for DME, the NEIVFQ-25 was completed at baseline and six, 12, 18, and 24months. Anchor-based (≥5-, ≥10-, and ≥15-letter gain in best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA]) and distribution-based estimates were calculated. Subgroup analyses included outcomes when the study eye was the better- or worse-seeing eye. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the trials (RIDE, N = 382; RISE, N = 377). Anchor-based estimates of clinically meaningful improvement in composite scores (for ≥15-letter gain in BCVA) were 3.78 and 2.23 for RIDE and RISE, respectively. Estimates appeared similar for most subscales: near activities (4.11 and 3.31), distance activities (3.53 and 3.74), driving difficulties (5.15 and 3.15), and vision-specific dependency (4.70 and 1.83). Supportive distribution-based meaningful change composite score estimates also were similar between RIDE and RISE for values based on 0.5 standard deviation (9.85 and 9.70, respectively) or standard error of the mean (5.10 and 4.82, respectively). These analyses suggest improvement of three to five points on the NEIVFQ-25 composite score and four individual subscales as clinically meaningful in patients with DME. This analysis supports considering these thresholds when assessing the clinical risk-benefit of DME treatment from the patient perspective using the NEIVFQ-25.

PCR16 Does Baseline Disease Severity Impact the Meaningful Score Difference of Clinical Outcome Assessments? Results From Studies in Two Itching-Related Skin Conditions

PCR16 Does Baseline Disease Severity Impact the Meaningful Score Difference of Clinical Outcome Assessments? Results From Studies in Two Itching-Related Skin Conditions

Factors that impact the implementation of patient reported outcomes in routine clinical care for peripheral artery disease from the patient perspective.

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are well-suited for the longitudinal assessment of quality of life, including depression and physical limitations associated with peripheral artery disease (PAD) that are not routinely assessed in clinical care. This study was designed to gain the patient perspective to facilitate implementation of PROMs into clinical practice for PAD management. Twenty-three patients with PAD at a single vascular surgery clinic were enrolled for a qualitative interview, July-December 2022. Patients completed PROMIS Physical Function and Depression assessments before undergoing semi-structured interviews. Two researchers used an inductive thematic analysis to analyze emergent themes from transcribed interviews. The average age of participants was 69.5 ± 8.2years; 91% were Caucasian, and 39% were female. Qualitative interviews revealed three implementation-related themes: (1) patient preferences on the timing and type of PROMs collected, (2) PROMs applications in outpatient PAD care, including discussions with their physician, and (3) the clinical value of PROMs. Overall, patients with PAD prefer PROMs related to quality of life and physical function over other domains. Patients appreciate the convenience to complete PROMs before their appointment. Patients would like to verbally discuss meaningful score changes with their providers without the use of graphical aids. Most patients believe PROMs are valuable in their clinical care if their physician reviews the results and the PROM questions apply to their disease symptoms. Patient preferences inform future successful implementations and will improve patient completion rates for the collection and clinical use of PROMs in PAD clinical care.

Prospective stability of memory for peritraumatic dissociation and anxiety: Replication and extension examining PTSD treatment modality and response.

Retrospective memory for peritraumatic reactions occurring during or immediately after trauma exposure may decrease in intensity for some over treatment. This may be due to psychotherapy-specific memory processes, such as repeated accessing of the trauma memory. Additionally, it may be that recovery drives changes in memory for these experiences. Critical to examining these hypotheses is an effective control treatment that reduces symptoms but does not directly involve repeated retrieval of the trauma memory, such as pharmacotherapy. In a sample of 200 individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder, retrospective memory for dissociation and anxiety occurring around the index traumatic event (Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire, Marmar et al., 1997; Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire, Cardeña et al., 2000) was assessed before and after treatment in a randomized clinical trial (NCT00127673) comparing prolonged exposure and sertraline. Participants reported that their memory for dissociation and anxiety at the time of the trauma was less intense at posttreatment (d = 0.26-0.64). There was no difference between prolonged exposure and sertraline on these memory indices. However, treatment responders, using a clinically meaningful change cutoff score, remembered their reactions at the time of the trauma as less dissociative (d = 0.66) and less anxious (d = 1.19) at posttreatment than nonresponders. Retrospective memory for the intensity of reactions experienced at the time of the traumatic event decreased from pre- to posttreatment, with effects most pronounced for those who made clinically meaningful gains in treatment. Inclusion of a nonpsychotherapy intervention control argues that recovery processes may explain these shifts and point to potential mood-dependent memory effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

The haemophilia joint health score for the assessment of joint health in patients with haemophilia.

The haemophilia joint health score (HJHS) is a tool used to assess joint changes in patients with haemophilia. There is lack of consensus on the interpretation of HJHS scores and their clinical relevance. To evaluate available literature reporting HJHS changes over time and assess a possible cut-off value for clinically relevant outcomes and the ideal follow-up for a meaningful score change. We conducted a literature search of studies published between 2011 and 2023 where the HJHS version 2.1 had been adopted to detect changes in joint health in patients with haemophilia. We focused on studies that assessed clinical relevance of HJHS changes, evaluated the use of cut-off values and reported a follow-up over time. Our search identified 213 publications of which 53 (25%) were deemed relevant for this review. Of these, 33 (62%) publications reported the total HJHS score and 20 (38%) reported a single joint HJHS score, while the way of reporting HJHS scores/change was highly variable. Ten publications (19%) assessed clinical relevance, but their methods of calculation differed (defining a cut-off score, measuring standardised response mean or minimal detectable change). The follow-up duration varied from 2weeks to 8years in these 10 studies. High variability in assessing HJHS change over time is the primary consequence of its low sensitivity, and the lack of consensus on interpretation and clinical relevance of the score. Therefore, more sensitive tools should be used alongside HJHS to better define the joint health status of patients with haemophilia.

Evaluating anchor variables and variation in meaningful score differences for PROMIS® Pediatric measures in children and adolescents living with a rheumatic disease

PurposeMeaningful score differences (MSDs), as defined by recent FDA guidance, can improve the interpretation of outcome measure scores and score changes. Well-accepted methods for estimating MSDs typically rely on external anchor variables, but the applications of these methods are limited in children and adolescents with rheumatic diseases. This project explored multiple candidate anchors for the PROMIS® Pediatric measures of Physical Activity, Fatigue, Pain Interference, and Mobility for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsLongitudinal data were extracted from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry. Candidate anchors included patient-reported domain-specific global impressions of change (GIC) along with other parent- and clinician-reported variables. Prior to MSD estimation, the quality of the anchors was assessed using a priori criteria (correlation ≥0.30, n≥10, <10% missing). Anchors meeting criteria were used to calculate MSDs.ResultsAmong 289 children with JIA and 47 with SLE, the GIC did not meet criteria inhalf of the scenarios. Other candidate anchors performed slightly better. The calculated MSDs varied by external anchor across measures, diagnoses, and direction of change (better vs worse).ConclusionsMany of the candidate external anchoring variables did not meet pre-specified criteria for calculating MSDs. Even for those that did, the choice of anchoring variable had a strong impact on the estimated MSD value and were different from other published values. As in adults, establishing pediatric MSDs requires selection of high-quality anchors, as changes in the variables used as anchors can impact MSD values and any subsequent score interpretations.

Measuring internalized health-related stigma across health conditions: development and validation of the I-HEARTS Scale.

Health-related stigma and its internalization among individuals with chronic health conditions contribute to impaired mental and physical health and quality of life. Research on health-related stigma has been siloed, with disease-specific measures that may not capture the experiences of individuals with multiple health conditions and that prevent comparisons across health conditions. The current study aimed to develop and test a transdiagnostic measure of internalized health-related stigma for use among adults with different physical health conditions. An existing measure of internalized mental health stigma was adapted to assess stigma due to chronic physical health conditions following COSMIN procedures, with input from advisory boards of community members living with a range of stigmatized health conditions (obesity, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, skin diseases, HIV, chronic pain, and cancers) and of health professionals who specialized in these conditions. The new Internalized Health-Related Stigma (I-HEARTS) Scale was tested in an online sample of 300 adults with these health conditions, recruited from ResearchMatch. Additional psychosocial measures of mental health and quality of life were administered, and participants provided information about their health conditions and demographic characteristics. Exploratory factor analysis and tests of reliability and validity were conducted to determine the psychometric properties of the I-HEARTS Scale, and k-means clustering and receiver of characteristic curve analysis were used to determine a clinically meaningful cutoff score indicating high levels of internalized stigma. Factor analysis results yielded a 25-item scale with a 3-factor solution, with subscales of Perceived and Anticipated Stigma, Stereotype Application and Self-Devaluation, and Stigma Resistance. Psychometric properties for internal consistency, inter-item and item-total correlations, and test-retest reliability were strong. Certain demographics (e.g., younger age) and characteristics related to health conditions (e.g., greater symptom severity) were associated with higher levels of internalized stigma. I-HEARTS Scale scores correlated moderately to strongly with related but distinct psychosocial measures, and a cutoff score of 3.40 or higher on the 1-7 rating scale was determined to indicate clinically meaningful levels of internalized stigma. The I-HEARTS Scale is a reliable and valid measure for the assessment of internalized health-related stigma among adults with varied stigmatized chronic health conditions. STUDY PRE-REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/84c5d/?view_only=87238512f6d6475c87f8f64280a8a15f .

Longitudinal Changes in Youth Mental Health From Before to During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Robust longitudinal studies of within-child changes in mental health associated with the COVID-19 pandemic are lacking, as are studies examining sources of heterogeneity in such changes. To investigate within-child changes, overall and between subgroups, in youth mental health from prepandemic to midpandemic. This cohort study used longitudinal prepandemic and midpandemic data from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, collected between January 1, 2015, and March 12, 2020 (prepandemic), and between March 13, 2020, and August 31, 2022 (midpandemic). Data were analyzed between December 1, 2022, and June 1, 2024. The sample included 9 US-based observational longitudinal pediatric ECHO cohorts. Cohorts were included if they collected the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) School Age version before and during the pandemic on more than 20 participants of normal birth weight aged 6 to 17 years. The COVID-19 pandemic. Prepandemic to midpandemic changes in CBCL internalizing, externalizing, depression, anxiety, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) scores were estimated, and differences in outcome trajectories by child sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, race, ethnicity, and poverty level) and prepandemic mental health problems were examined using established CBCL clinical score thresholds. A total of 1229 participants (mean [SD] age during the pandemic, 10.68 [2.29] years; 625 girls [50.9%]) were included. The sample was socioeconomically diverse (197 of 1056 children [18.7%] lived at ≤130% of the Federal Poverty Level; 635 (51.7%) identified as White, 388 (31.6%) as Black, 147 (12.0%) as multiracial, 40 (3.3%) as another race, and 118 (9.6%) as Hispanic). Generalized linear mixed-effects models revealed minor decreases in externalizing problems (β = -0.88; 95% CI, -1.16 to -0.60), anxiety (β = -0.18; 95% CI, -0.31 to -0.05), and ADHD (β = -0.36; 95% CI, -0.50 to -0.22), but a minor increase in depression (β = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.35). Youth with borderline or clinically meaningful prepandemic scores experienced decreases across all outcomes, particularly externalizing problems (borderline, β = -2.85; 95% CI, -3.92 to -1.78; clinical, β = -4.88; 95% CI, -5.84 to -3.92). Low-income (β = -0.76; 95% CI, -1.14 to -0.37) and Black (β = -0.52; 95% CI, -0.83 to -0.20) youth experienced small decreases in ADHD compared with higher income and White youth, respectively. In this longitudinal cohort study of economically and racially diverse US youth, there was evidence of differential susceptibility and resilience for mental health problems during the pandemic that was associated with prepandemic mental health and sociodemographic characteristics.

Book review: Meaningful language test scores: Research to enhance score interpretation

Book review: Meaningful language test scores: Research to enhance score interpretation

Psychometric evaluation of the patient-reported experience of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia (PRECIS) scale

BackgroundCognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) represents a distinct, persistent, and core group of schizophrenia symptoms. Cognitive symptoms have been shown to have an impact on quality of life. There are several published CIAS measures, but none based on direct patient self-report. It is important to capture the patient’s perspective to supplement performancebased outcome measures of cognition to provide a complete picture of the patient’s experience. This paper describes additional validation work on the Patient-Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) instrument.MethodsData from two large, international, pharmaceutical clinical trials in medically and psychiatrically stable English-speaking patients with schizophrenia and 88 healthy controls were analyzed. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted in one trial (n = 215), using the original 35-item PRECIS. The factor structure suggested by EFA was further evaluated using item response theory (IRT; Samejima’s graded response model), and tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Both EFA and CFA results were tested in a second trial with similar inclusion/exclusion characteristics (n = 410). Additional statistical properties were evaluated in healthy controls.ResultsEFA suggested that the best solution after item reduction suggested a factor structure of 6 factors based on 26 items (memory, communication, self-control, executive function, attention, sharpness of thought), supporting a total score, with an additional 2-item bother score (28 items in all). IRT analysis indicated the items were well-ordered within each domain. The CFA demonstrated excellent model fit, accounting for 69% of the variance. The statistical properties of the 28-item version of the PRECIS were confirmed in the second trial. Evidence for internal consistency and test-retest reliability was robust. Known-groups validity was supported by comparison of healthy controls with patients with schizophrenia. Correlations indicated moderate associations between PRECIS and functioning instruments like the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS), but weak correlations with performance-based outcomes like MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB).DiscussionUsing two clinical trial samples, we identified a robust factor structure for the PRECIS and were able to replicate it in the second sample. Evaluation of the meaningful score difference (MSD) should be repeated in future studies, as these samples did not show enough change for it to be evaluated.ConclusionsThis analysis provides strong evidence for the reliability and validity of the PRECIS, a 28-item, patient-reported instrument to assess cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia. The correlation with functioning and the weak correlation with performance on cognitive tasks suggests that patient reports of cognitive impairment measure a unique aspect of patient experience.

Integrating 4 Methods (In4M) to evaluate physical function in patients with cancer: Results of a comprehensive digital health study.

1564 Background: Physical function (PF) is a core outcome in cancer trials that can inform treatment tolerability. PF can be assessed across modalities including by patient (pt) report, clinician (clin) report, performance tests and digital sensors. The optimal approach for PF measurement has not been defined. Methods: In4M is a prospective observational study evaluating PF in pts initiating chemotherapy for breast cancer or lymphoma followed over 9 months. We used an electronic platform (Hugo) to aggregate serially assessed pt-reported PF, clin- and pt-reported ECOG performance status (PS), 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and wearable (Fitbit) data. We evaluated feasibility in all pts; associations among PF measures and the ability of PF measures to detect change were evaluated in pts with both baseline (BL) and 3-month (3M) data. We used Pearson correlations to assess the relationship of average daily steps with measures of PF. To assess change, we compared each PF measure from BL to 3M using a 2-sided α=.05 paired t-test. Results: Of the208 pts enrolled, 193 (93%) and 159 (76%) completed surveys, and 121 (58%) and 124 (60%) provided wearable data (evaluable: ≥1 day data) at BL and 3M, respectively. When requiring a stringent BL with 4+ days of data with ≥1 weekend day to be evaluable, 88 (42%) and 120 (58%) provided wearable data at BL and 3M. At both BL and 3M, pt-reported PF was generally more highly correlated with wearable-derived daily steps than clin-reported PF and 6MWT were (Table). Significant declines in PF were observed for pt- and clin-reported PF (all p&lt;0.05), but not other modalities. Conclusions: Longitudinalassessment of multi-modal PF data including pragmatic wearable data collection was feasible in pts receiving chemotherapy. Pt-reported PF was the only modality that was both correlated with step count and able to detect change. Additional wearable metrics, correlations among PF measurements and outcomes, and clinically meaningful change scores will be reported. Optimal PF measurement may improve future reporting of treatment tolerability. Clinical trial information: NCT05214144 . [Table: see text]

Assessing quadriceps strength in patellofemoral pain patients: A study on the reliability and validity of a low-cost strain-gauge for clinical practice.

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common knee complaint affecting diverse populations both acutely and chronically. Quadriceps muscle weakness is one possible aetiology, but current devices for measuring muscle strength (isokinetic dynamometer [ID] and hand-held dynamometers [HHD]) are frequently too expensive (e.g., ID) or lack reliability (e.g., HHD) for practitioners, especially in under-resourced settings. There is a need to evaluate a low-cost device to manage rehabilitation of people with PFP. Isometric quadriceps strength of participants aged 18-35 years (total [n = 33], control group [n = 17] and PFP group [n = 16]) were evaluated on an isokinetic dynamometer and a commercially available strain gauge at baseline and after an 8-week non-standardised intervention. The strain gauge showed high absolute and relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89-0.99; typical error of measurement = 3.9-10.4%). Clinically meaningful difference scores (12.2-45 Nm) were greater than the typical error of measurement, implying sufficient sensitivity of the strain gauge to measure true changes in isometric quadricep strength. Strong to very strong correlations were evident between the strain gauge and isokinetic dynamometer torque measurements (r = 0.88-0.90, SEE = 0.05-0.07 Nm), but slope values (β = 0.65-0.77) indicated that torque from the strain gauge was lower than that obtained from the isokinetic dynamometer. An average systematic bias of 16.3-28.8 Nm was evident in favour of the isokinetic dynamometer, with no statistically significant between-group differences apparent between baseline and follow-up testing. The present commercially available strain gauge is reliable and sensitive enough to detect clinically meaningful differences in quadriceps strength of both healthy individuals and those with PFP. However, the strain gauge lacks validity and therefore cannot replace isokinetic dynamometry. Given the low cost and excellent reliability, the strain gauge can be a valuable tool to assess quadriceps muscle deficits and track rehabilitation progress in people with PFP.

Development and validation of the caregiver Burden from infant home NGT care instrument

ObjectiveTo design and validate an age and condition-specific health status instrument to best reflect the parental experience caring for these children with complex needs and home Nasogastric Tube (NGT) placement. Study designCombined Qualitative and Quantitative design, testing and implementation for item production and reduction, followed by formal validation by evaluating validity, reliability, and establishing a clinically meaningful change score. SettingsTertiary care, multi-disciplinary aerodigestive center. ParticipantsAll caregivers whose infant met criteria for eligibility for discharge home from the NICU or Special Care Nursery (SCN) with NGT in place were offered inclusion in this group.Intervention/Exposure: Structured qualitative interviews of these caregivers to explore and define these concepts and domains, to item generate and then reduce, and then psychometric analyses. MethodsStructured, moderated qualitative interviews with parents/caregivers of children who have undergone home NGT care of their children for item creation, design, and then reduction. Reliability was assessed by Cronbach alpha analysis. Construct validity and clinically meaningful change score was assessed using various query methods. Main outcome measuresCronbach's alpha to assess reliability, a priori hypotheses validity analyses, and minimally important clinical difference calculation. ResultsScaled scores of this condition specific instrument ranged from 14 to 74 where higher scores indicate better QOL related to managing the NGT. Cronbach's alpha with all 14 items was 0.93. Validity was assessed by a self-assessment question to discriminate between change (95% CI: 8.5–14.1; p < 0.0001) as well as by other comparators to identify the instrument's ability to discriminate among populations where parents felt a difference in experience. The minimally important difference was calculated at 18 points. ConclusionThis represents the initial validation of the first condition and age-specific health status instrument to assess parent experience of caring for infants requiring a home NGT for dysphagia.

Telehealth Engaged Music for Pain Outcomes: A Music and Imagery Proof-of-concept Study with Veterans.

Music therapy interventions target biopsychosocial outcomes and are a non-pharmacological option for integrated pain management. To date, most music and pain studies have focused on acute pain, passive music experiences, and in-person delivery. The purpose of this study was to examine feasibility and acceptability and determine proof-of-concept for a newly developed telehealth music imagery (MI) intervention for Veterans with chronic pain. A single-group proof-of-concept pilot study was conducted with Veterans with chronic pain (n = 8). Feasibility was assessed through examination of recruitment, retention, and session/measure completion rates; acceptability through participant interviews; and whether the intervention resulted in clinically meaningful change scores (pre- to post-intervention) on measures of pain, anxiety, and depression at the individual level. For Veterans who passed eligibility screening, we had an enrollment rate of 89%, with good retention (75%). Overall, participating Veterans found the intervention acceptable, identified specific challenges with technology, and recommended an increased number of sessions. Preliminary outcome data for pain, anxiety, and depression were mixed, with some Veterans reporting clinically meaningful improvements and others reporting no change or worsening symptoms. Findings informed modifications to the telehealth MI intervention and the design of a larger pilot randomized controlled trial to assess feasibility and acceptability of the modified intervention in a larger population of Veterans with chronic pain using additional measures and a control condition.

Life's Essential 8 Cardiovascular Health Score and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in the Community.

The relation of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) to lifestyle behaviors and factors linked with cardiovascular health remains unclear. We aimed to understand how the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score (and its changes over time) relate to CRF and complementary exercise measures in community-dwelling adults. Framingham Heart Study (FHS) participants underwent maximum effort cardiopulmonary exercise testing for direct quantification of peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2). A 100-point LE8 score was constructed as the average across 8 factors: diet, physical activity, nicotine exposure, sleep, body mass index, lipids, blood glucose, and blood pressure. We related total LE8 score, score components, and change in LE8 score over 8 years with peak V̇O2 (log-transformed) and complementary CRF measures. In age- and sex-adjusted linear models (N=1838, age 54±9 years, 54% women, LE8 score 76±12), a higher LE8 score was associated favorably with peak V̇O2, ventilatory efficiency, resting heart rate, and blood pressure response to exercise (all P<0.0001). A clinically meaningful 5-point higher LE8 score was associated with a 6.0% greater peak V̇O2 (≈1.4 mL/kg per minute at sample mean). All LE8 components were significantly associated with peak V̇O2 in models adjusted for age and sex, but blood lipids, diet, and sleep health were no longer statistically significant after adjustment for all LE8 components. Over an ≈8-year interval, a 5-unit increase in LE8 score was associated with a 3.7% higher peak V̇O2 (P<0.0001). Higher LE8 score and improvement in LE8 over time was associated with greater CRF, highlighting the importance of the LE8 factors in maintaining CRF.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of anamorelin for cancer cachexia: Interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance in Japan.

Anamorelin was approved in Japan in 2021 to treat cancer cachexia associated with non-small cell lung, gastric, pancreatic, or colorectal cancers. Post-marketing surveillance is being conducted to evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of anamorelin. This prospective, observational surveillance registered all patients who started treatment with anamorelin after April 21, 2021. Hyperglycemia, hepatic impairment, conduction disorders, and their associated adverse events related to treatment were defined as main safety specifications. Body weight (BW) and appetite were assessed as effectiveness specifications. This analysis was based on data as of January 21, 2023. The safety and effectiveness analysis sets included 6016 and 4511 patients, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events in ≥1% of patients were hyperglycemia (3.9%) and nausea (2.6%). The incidences of hyperglycemia, hepatic impairment, conduction disorders, and their associated adverse events related to treatment were 4.8%, 1.2%, and 1.1%, respectively. The mean changes (standard error [SE]) in BW from baseline to weeks 3, 12, 24, and 52 were 0.64 (0.05) kg, 1.19 (0.12) kg, 1.40 (0.21) kg, and 1.42 (0.39) kg, respectively. The mean changes (SE) in Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Treatment 5-item Anorexia Symptom Scale total scores from baseline to weeks 3, 12, 24, and 52 were 3.2 (0.09), 4.8 (0.18), 5.2 (0.30), and 5.3 (0.47), respectively, exceeding the clinically meaningful improvement score (2.0 points). The overall safety of anamorelin raised no new safety concerns, although continued caution may be required for hyperglycemia and nausea. Improvements in BW and appetite were also observed in real-world clinical settings.

Nonoperative Treatment as an Option for Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a risk factor for early osteoarthritis (OA) onset. Generally, ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is associated with better outcomes. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the effect of operative versus nonoperative treatment for preventing premature knee OA in isolated ACL tears while achieving good functional outcomes. The purpose of the study was to compare the outcomes of ACLR to primarily nonoperative management of isolated ACL tears. It was hypothesized that the outcomes between treatment types would be similar. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. This systematic review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration No. CRD42021285901) and was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook guidelines. We systematically searched for randomized and nonrandomized studies that compared ACLR with nonoperative treatments in isolated ACL tears in 3 databases until October 25, 2021. The risk of bias and quality of evidence of the included studies was assessed in accordance with the Cochrane guidelines. The primary outcome was radiologic signs of OA, and the secondary outcomes were functional parameters. Using the common effects model, we calculated pooled mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. Five studies-2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 3 retrospective non-RCTs-were included. There was a moderate risk of bias in 2 studies and a serious risk of bias in 1 study. The quality of evidence was rated low because of the higher risk of bias and inconsistency. Nonoperatively treated knees showed a trend toward lower odds of developing radiological signs of OA (OR, 1.84 [95% CI, 0.90 to 3.75]); however, surgically reconstructed knees had significantly better stability (MD, -2.44 [95% CI, -3.21 to -1.66 ]) and a trend toward better but clinically not meaningful Lysholm scores (MD, 2.88 [95% CI, -1.09 to 6.85]). The qualitative synthesis showed that surgical reconstruction was protective against subsequent injuries but not superior when returning to previous activity levels or various functional tests. Findings indicated that there is no certain evidence that ACLR for an isolated ACL tear is superior to nonoperative treatment. Clinicians should consider nonoperative treatments with a well-designed rehabilitative program as a primary option. However, these findings must be interpreted with caution because of low study quality and high risk of bias.

The Sense of Resilience of health care professionals in Latvia measured by Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scale

IntroductionIn this research work the sense of resilience was studied, which is an essential factor in reducing the stress of health care workers, it also helps to maintain the sustainability of the work of medical specialists and prevents the burnout syndrome. Aaron Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence scale was used in this study, which helps to determine how health care professionals are able to preserve their mental and physical health.ObjectivesThis study is aimed to determine the differences in components of Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence scale for various health care specialists and to describe the factor structure of Coherence scale for health care specialists in Latvia, that forms the sense of resilience for health care specialists.Methods The questionnaire used in the study is Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence scale’s (Antonovsky, 1987) Latvian version, that was translated into Latvian and adapted in the research work of A. Veylande, N. Bahmačova (2000). 202 respondents who are representatives of medical professions took part in this study. The obtained data were entered into the MS Excel computer program and were statistically processed using the SPSS 22 computer program.Results Looking at the obtained results of this study, it can be stated that Medical Doctors- Specialists have statistically significantly higher Comprehensibility scores than Medical Orderlies (p = 0.01, r = 0.24), while Medical Doctors- Specialists and Medical Doctors- Residents have statistically significantly higher Manageability scores than Medical Orderlies (p= 0.04, r=0.21). Based on the analysis of the results, it has been determined that Doctors-Specialists (p=0.00, r=0.32) and Doctors-Residents (p=0.00, r=0.34) have statistically significantly higher Meaningfulness indicators than Medical Orderlies, as well as Doctors-Specialists (p=0.00, r=0.29) and Doctors-Residents (p=0.00, r=0.31) have statistically significantly higher Meaningfulness scores than Medical Nurses.ConclusionsHigher scores of the three components of Antonovsky’s scale for Medical Doctors-Specialists and Medical Doctors-Residents compared to Medical Orderlies and Medical Nurses could be explained by a lower overall time that Doctors spend in the department with patients. Higher education helps to overcome stress at work and to become aware of possible strategies for improving the joy of life, ways to reduce stress at work and to relax from work.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared