Mean Transaortic Pressure Gradient Research Articles

P305Prognostic value of relative apical sparing pattern of longitudinal strain in patients with severe aortic stenosis

Abstract Background The relative apical sparing pattern (RASP) of left ventricular longitudinal strain (LS) is determined on the strain polar map, while global longitudinal strain (GLS) is measured using speckle-tracking echocardiography and is frequently associated with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). According to recent reports, some elderly patients with aortic stenosis (AS) suffer from transthyretin CA and have a poor prognosis. Accordingly, we aimed to investigate the association of RASP and outcome of patients with severe AS. Methods We retrospectively studied 157 consecutive patients (age: 81±10 years, 33% men) with severe AS (mean transaortic pressure gradient: 49 mmHg) and preserved ejection fraction (>50%). After measuring GLS, RASP was semi-quantitatively and quantitatively assessed. Semi-quantitative RASP (sRASP) was defined as reduction of LS (more than −10%), showing light red or blue in ≥5 segments out of the basal six segments, relative to apical LS (less than −15%) showing red. This analysis was independently performed in a blinded manner by two observers. Quantitative RASP (qRASP) was calculated using the following formula: average apical LS/(average basal LS + average mid-ventricle LS), then qRASP ≥1 was determined as positive according to the previous paper. Patients were followed up to determine their outcomes, i.e., sudden cardiac death or unexpected admission due to heart failure over a median duration of 1.9 years. Concordance of sRASP was assessed using the kappa statistic, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association between the parameters and primary outcome. Results The consistency in the observations of the two sonographers in identifying sRASP was found to be excellent (κ = 1.00). sRASP and qRASP were observed in 24 (15%) and 42 (27%) patients, respectively, and were significantly associated with the primary outcome (n=44; 28%). The representative case is shown in figure (left panel). Further, positive sRASP was associated with the outcome after adjusting for the Euro score, NYHA ≥II, and GLS (hazard ratio = 2.69, p=0.01). The model based on these covariates significantly improved following the addition of sRASP (Figure; right panel). In addition, sRASP was observed in four patients out of 50 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement. Of these, one patient had the primary outcome (25%). On the other hand, in the remaining 46 patients without sRASP, four patients had the outcome (9%). Figure 1 Conclusions RASP was observed in some patients with severe AS and has been shown to have increasing importance in predicting adverse cardiac events in such patients.

P5577Preoperative transaortic pressure gradient predicts renal functional improvement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with chronic kidney disease

Abstract Introduction Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) theoretically increases renal blood flow through increasing cardiac output by relieving aortic valvular obstruction of blood flow from left ventricle, resulting in a renal functional recovery in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). However, procedural steps of TAVI including contrast use potentially damages renal medulla and may deteriorate renal function. Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate renal functional change and clarify preoperative predictors for renal functional improvement after TAVI in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with severe AS. Methods A total of 88 consecutive severe AS patients with CKD (grade >3) who underwent TAVI from 2015 to 2018 was enrolled in this observational study. They were divided into two groups depending on their renal functional improvement after TAVI that was defined as more than 10% increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at discharge from their preoperative level. Results Among the whole candidates, 49 patients (55.7%) were improved their renal function. Patients with the lowest preoperative eGFR achieved the highest increase in eGFR after TAVI (CKD grade >4: +22.7±23.7%, Figure). Patients in the Improved group had lower hemoglobin level, higher mean transaortic pressure gradient (TAPG), and higher aortic valve gradient before TAVI, compared to those in the Non-improved group. However, contrast volume during the procedure was not significantly different between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that high mean TAPG and low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) before TAVI were independent predictors for the improvement of renal function (odds ratio (OR): 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00–1.08; OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89–0.99, respectively), even after the adjustment of baseline eGFR level and hemoglobin level that were statistically significant on univariate logistic regression analysis. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve showed the cut-off level of preoperative mean TAPG in renal functional improvement after TAVI as 47.0 mmHg (Sensitivity: 47.9%, Specificity: 79.5%, area under the curve: 0.62). Correlation between CKDgrade and ΔeGFR Conclusions Preoperative high mean TAPG may predict renal functional improvement after TAVI in patients with deteriorated renal function. This non-invasive predictor may help clinicians to consider to perform TAVI in a challenging case with severe CKD.

Influence of leaflet geometry on hydrodynamic performance of transcatheter aortic valve prostheses

Abstract The implantation of transcatheter aortic valve prostheses (TAVP) for therapy of aortic valve stenosis shows more and more clinically non-inferiority results compared to surgical valve replacement in intermediate and low risk patients. Commonly clinically used TAVP are manufactured from chemically fixed xenograft leaflet material, e.g. bovine or porcine pericardium. While the clinical use of TAVP currently extends, challenges concerning valve durability and leaflet calcification have to be addressed. In this regard, artificial leaflet materials represent a promising option for a next generation of TAVP. As a first step for the development of TAVP from polymeric nonwoven, the aim of this study was to determine the influence of leaflet geometry on hydrodynamic performance of TAVP prototypes. Based on a parametric model of the valve leaflets, we varied the curvature of the belly line forming the leaflet coaptation area from an initial, quite concave, leaflet geometry with a value of 0.5° to an almost straight geometry for the leaflets with a value 0.15°. Manufacturing of TAVP prototypes was conducted by means of electrospinning technique with a polycarbonate based silicone elastomer. Hydrodynamic characterization according to ISO 5840-3 standards was performed using a pulse duplicator system with a heart rate of 70 BPM, systolic duration of 35%, mean aortic pressure of 100 mmHg and a stroke volume of 96 ml. Cardiac output as well as mean transaortic pressure gradient, closing volume, leakage volume and regurgitation were measured to compare the different leaflet geometries. To summarize, the curvature of the leaflets’ belly has a crucial impact on TAVP hydrodynamics under physiological test conditions. In particular, the opening and closing behavior is strongly influenced by a steeper curvature leading to larger closing volumes and higher regurgitant fractions. Further studies are planned to identify an optimum with respect to leaflet material selection, leaflet geometry and hydrodynamic properties of TAVP.

The role of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the patients with severe aortic stenosis requiring major non-cardiac surgery.

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is considered as an independent risk factor for perioperative cardiac complications of non-cardiac surgery. Surgical aortic valve replacement should be considered before non-cardiac surgery in patients with symptomatic severe AS. However, recently, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative approach for selected AS patients. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of TAVR in preparation for major non-cardiac surgery. From our retrospective database, seven patients who underwent TAVR in preparation for major non-cardiac surgery were identified, and their clinical and hemodynamic data were collected. After TAVR, a significant reduction in the mean transaortic pressure gradient from 54.0 (Interquartile range (IQR) 47.5-64.5) to 18.0 (IQR 12.5-19.0) mmHg (p = 0.016) and an increase in the calculated aortic valve area from 0.6 (IQR 0.6-0.7) to 1.3 (IQR 1.1-1.5) cm2 (p = 0.022) were noted. Non-cardiac surgery included lung segmentectomy and lymph node dissection, lung lobectomy, ileocecal resection, partial colectomy, partial nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, laparoscopic nephrectomy, and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. All the initial non-cardiac surgeries were performed without cardiac complications, under general anesthesia, 37 (IQR 32-74) days after TAVR. Two of the patients eventually needed additional non-cardiac surgery, which was performed uneventfully without the need for additional AS treatment. TAVR was an effective and safe procedure that might reduce the risk of general anesthesia and major non-cardiac surgery in severe AS.

Transaortic repair of concomitant mitral insufficiency in patients with critical aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valvular replacement.

In this study, we present operation technique and outcomes of transaortic mitral valve repair in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement due to severe aortic stenosis. Between January 2005 and March 2016, a total of 11 patients (7 females, 4 males; mean age 71.2±4.1 years; range, 65 to 77 years) with severe aortic valve stenosis (aortic valve area <1 cm2 or aortic valve area index <0.6 cm2/m2) and concomitant moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (non-ischemic, regurgitant jet origin between A2-P2 portions) secondary to left ventricular dysfunction (EuroSCORE logistic score >5%, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%) who were operated were retrospectively analyzed. Aortic valve replacement and transaortic mitral edge-to-edge repair was applied to all patients. Operations were performed through sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass, and bicaval venous return. Transesophageal echocardiography was used to evaluate mitral valve before surgery and valve functions after surgery. Postoperative course of all patients was monitored, and postoperative complications were recorded. The mean preoperative ejection fraction was 24.5±4.1% and the mean transaortic pressure gradient was 35.8±4.8 mmHg. The mean aortic cross-clamp time was 62.09±10.1 (range, 43 to 76) min and the median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 90.1±11.9 (range, 66 to 114) min. No hospital mortality was observed. In the postoperative period, two patients experienced renal insufficiency. Hemofiltration was initiated in these patients and no dialysis was required at two weeks. One patient had postoperative atrial fibrillation and one patient had pericardial effusion leading to cardiac tamponade and this patient underwent reoperation. The patients were followed up for a mean of four years and control echocardiography didn"t detect increase in mitral regurgitation degree. Transaortic edge-to-edge mitral valve repair can be used in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. This technique is feasible with shorter cross-clamp time and can reduce mortality and morbidity in selected high-risk patients.

Diagnosis and treatment of aortic valve stenosis

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is the most frequently observed valvular heart disease. Once it is symptomatic the mortality rapidly increases. The diagnostic gold standard is transthoracic echocardiography. By measuring the maximum transvalvular velocity, mean transaortic pressure gradient and aortic valve opening area, classification of the type of stenosis can be defined. A differentiation is made between high-gradient AS, low-flow low gradient AS with reduced ventricular ejection fraction (<50%) and the paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS with preserved ventricular function (≥50%). In some cases, additional diagnostic tools are necessary using dobutamine stress echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac computed tomography. The treatment follows an individualized approach. In cases of indications for valve replacement the multidisciplinary heart team takes into account the patient's age and individual risk for deciding whether an open surgical approach or transcatheter aortic valve implantation is indicated.

RF32 IS THE AORTIC VALVE AREA AN EFFECTIVE DIAGNOSTIC PARAMETER OF SEVERE AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS?

Background and Aim: Clinical grading of aortic stenosis (AS) is currently performed non-invasively by Doppler transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) through measurement of aortic peak velocity, mean transaortic pressure gradient, and aortic valve area (AVA). The objective of the study was to evaluate the effective valve area through an intraoperative invasive measurement using various dimensions of Hegar, to evaluate the effective valve area, respecting the valve opening, in the absence of deformation of the valve cusps themselves. Methods: From March 2017 to April 2018, 60 of patients who underwent elective aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis, where also subjected to intraoperative invasive measurement with Hegar. 18 patients (30%) had a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). All patients underwent preoperative TTE and intraoperative trans-esophageal echocardiogram (TEE). Results: Intraoperative invasive measurement through Hegar showed a total correspondence in aortic valvular area calculated preoperatively by means of TTE and TEE in presence of BAV (P = NS). Instead, in presence of a morphologically tricuspid aortic valve a statistically significant difference (P = 0.001) was highlighted between AVA calculated using non-invasive tests, and invasive measurement by means of Hegar. The last one showed a higher value in comparison with TTE and TEE. Conclusions: AVA is an excellent evaluation parameter in presence of BAV stenosis. Instead, in tricuspid aortic valve stenosis, other parameters should be considered, because preoperative AVA is not the only parameter of certainty for the evaluation of the severity degree of stenosis. The greatest limitation is the small number of sample and consequently a larger study is necessary.

Value of low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography on defining true severe low gradient aortic stenosis in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is a valuable tool to distinguish true-severe (TS) from pseudo-severe (PS) low gradient aortic valve stenosis (LGAS) in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, only scanty studies reported the clinical utility of DSE in differentiating TS-LGAS patients with preserved LVEF. We investigated the clinical utility of DSE in LGAS patients with preserved LVEF and the echocardiographic determinants suggestive of TS-LGAS. 130 consecutive LGAS patients [indexed aortic valve area (AVA) ≤ 0.6cm2/m2 and mean trans-aortic pressure gradient (PGmean) < 40mmHg] with preserved (≥ 50%, n = 63) and reduced (< 50%, n = 67) LVEF were included. DSE defined TS-LGAS (projected AVA ≤ 1 cm2) in 61.2% patients with reduced LVEF and in 68.3% patients with preserved LVEF. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that baseline AVA was an independent determinant of TS-LGAS both in LVEF ≥ 50% (OR 0.45, P = 0.004) and LVEF < 50% groups (OR 0.55, P = 0.005). Reduced septal and lateral mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE, OR 0.72 and 0.75, P = 0.013 and 0.016) and septal TDI-s´ were significantly associated with TS-LGAS in patients with LVEF ≥ 50%. Higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP, OR 1.43, P = 0.045) was associated with TS-LGAS in patients with LVEF < 50%. DSE is useful to define TS-LGAS also in patients with preserved LVEF. Lower baseline AVA values are linked with TS-LGAS in both patients with reduced and preserved LVEF. Reduced MAPSE and septal TDI-s´ are suggestive of TS-LGAS in patients with preserved LVEF, while higher SPAP is associated with TS-LGAS in patients with reduced LVEF.

Impact of stroke volume assessment by integrating multi-detector computed tomography and Doppler data on the classification of aortic stenosis

BackgroundThe prevalence of low flow low gradient (LFLG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) may be overrated due to underestimation of stroke volume in two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. The implications of 3D imaging on stroke volume calculation for AS classification have not been elucidated. Integrating multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and Doppler data may improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with LFLG AS. MethodsA total of 186 patients with severe AS evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve replacement were classified according to indexed stroke volume (SVI, cut-off 35mL/m2) and mean transaortic pressure gradient (cut-off 40mmHg). SVI was calculated using a) the biplane Simpson's method, b) left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity time integral (VTI) and LVOT diameter determined by 2D echocardiography, or c) LVOT VTI and LVOT area planimetered by MDCT. ResultsSVI assessed by the biplane Simpson's method was smaller than that obtained from 2D echocardiography LVOT diameter (29.5±0.6 vs 34.9±0.8mL/m2, p<0.001). The latter was smaller than SVI calculated by integrating MDCT and Doppler data (47.5±1.4mL/m2, p<0.001). LFLG and paradoxical LFLG severe AS were diagnosed in 42.5% and 27.4% of patients using the biplane Simpson's method, in 30.1% and 16.7% using 2D echocardiography LVOT diameter, and in 17.2% and 8.1% when integrating MDCT and Doppler data. ConclusionsThe prevalence of LFLG and paradoxical LFLG severe AS was overestimated by 2.5- and 3.4-fold based on 2D echocardiography alone. Integration of MDCT and Doppler data should be considered for stroke volume assessment in the classification of severe AS.

Usefulness of Electrocardiographic Strain to Predict Survival After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis

Electrocardiographic (ECG) strain has been reported as a specific marker of midwall left ventricular (LV) myocardial fibrosis, predictive of adverse clinical outcomes in aortic stenosis (AS), but its prognostic impact after aortic valve replacement (AVR) is unknown. We aimed to assess the impact of ECG strain on long-term mortality after surgical AVR for AS. From January 2005 to January 2014, patients with interpretable preoperative ECG who underwent isolated AVR for AS were included. ECG strain was defined as ≥1-mm concave downslopping ST-segment depression with asymmetrical T-wave inversion in lateral leads. Mortality was assessed over a follow-up period of 4.8 ± 2.7 years. Among the 390 patients included, 110 had ECG strain (28%). They had significantly lower body mass index, higher mean transaortic pressure gradient and Cornell-product ECG LV hypertrophy than in those without ECG strain. There was also a trend for lower LV ejection fraction in patients with ECG strain as compared with those without. Patients with ECG strain had significantly lower 8-year survival than those without. ECG strain remained associated with reduced survival both in patients with and without LV hypertrophy (p <0.0001 for both). After adjustment, ECG strain remained a strong and independent determinant of long-term survival (hazard ratio 4.4, p <0.0001). Similar results were found in patients with LV hypertrophy or without LV hypertrophy. In the multivariate model, the addition of ECG strain provided incremental prognostic value (p <0.0001). In conclusion, in patients with AS, ECG strain is associated with 4-fold increased risk of long-term mortality after isolated AVR, regardless of preoperative LV hypertrophy.

Impact of Mean Transaortic Pressure Gradient on Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

BackgroundMean transaortic pressure gradient (MTPG) has never been validated as a predictor of mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis. We sought to determine the value of MTPG to predict mortality in a large prospective cohort of severe aortic stenosis patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and to investigate the cutoff of 60 mm Hg, proposed in American guidelines.Methods and ResultsA total of 1143 patients with severe aortic stenosis defined by aortic valve area ≤1 cm2 and MTPG ≥40 mm Hg were included. The population was divided into 3 groups according to MTPG: between 40 and 49 mm Hg, between 50 and 59 mm Hg, and ≥60 mm Hg. The end point was all‐cause mortality. MTPG was ≥60 mm Hg in 392 patients. Patients with MTPG ≥60 mm Hg had a significantly increase risk of mortality compared with patients with MTPG <60 mm Hg (hazard ratio [HR]=1.62 [1.27–2.05] P<0.001), even for the subgroup of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients (HR=1.56 [1.04–2.34] P=0.032). After adjustment for established outcome predictors, patients with MTPG ≥60 mm Hg had a significantly higher risk of mortality than patients with MTPG <60 mm Hg (HR=1.71 [1.33–2.20] P<0.001), even after adjusting for surgery as a time‐dependent variable (HR=1.71 [1.43–2.11] P<0.001). Similar results were observed for the subgroup of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients (HR=1.70 [1.10–2.32] P=0.018 and HR=1.68 [1.20–2.36] P=0.003, respectively).ConclusionsThis study shows the negative prognostic impact of high MTPG (≥60 mm Hg), on long‐term outcome of patients with severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, irrespective of symptoms.

35 - Impact of Mean Transaortic Pressure Gradient on Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

35 - Impact of Mean Transaortic Pressure Gradient on Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Differences in Aortic Valve and Left Ventricular Parameters Related to the Severity of Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis.

ObjectiveThis study investigated the morphological and functional characteristics of the aortic valve and the left ventricular (LV) systolic functional parameters and myocardial mass related to the severity of myocardial fibrosis (MF) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS).Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 81 patients (48 men; mean age: 59±12 years) with severe AS who underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), cardiac computed tomography (CCT), and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) within 1 month and subsequent aortic valve surgery. Degree of MF was determined on delayed contrast-enhanced CMR with visual sub-segmental analysis-based quantification and was classified into three groups (no, mild, and severe) for identifying the differences in LV function and characteristics of the aortic valve. One-way ANOVA, Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test were used to compare variables of the three groups. Univariate multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between the severity of MF and variables on imaging modalities.ResultsOf 81 patients, 34 (42%) had MF (mild, n = 18; severe, n = 16). Aortic valve calcium volume score on CCT, aortic valve area, LV mass index, LV end-diastolic volume index on CMR, presence of mild aortic regurgitation (AR), transaortic mean pressure gradient, and peak velocity on TTE were significantly different among the three groups and were associated with severity of MF on a univariate multinomial logistic regression analysis. Aortic valve calcium grade was different (p = 0.008) among the three groups but not associated with severity of MF (p = 0.375).ConclusionsA multi-imaging approach shows that severe AS with MF is significantly associated with more severe calcific AS, higher LV end-diastolic volume, higher LV mass, and higher prevalence of mild AR.

Abstract 12513: Comparison of Global Myocardial Function With 2 Types of Pressure-Overload Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Using Two-Dimentional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography

Introduction: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) secondary to hypertension and aortic stenosis (AS) are often considered together to be pressure overload hypertrophy. Comparisons of myocardial function by the 2 most common causes of LVH are limited. The global LV afterload that may be assessed by valvuloarterial impedance plays a detrimental effect on LV systolic function. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that important differences may exist in the myocardial function with these 2 origins of pressure-overload LVH. Methods: Global LV longitudinal strain (GLS) were measured using speckle-tracking echocardiography in 38 hypertensive LVH (H-LVH) patients and 36 patients with severe AS and preserved LV ejection fraction. To estimate the global LV afterload, we calculated the valvuloarterial impedance (Z va ) as the sum of the systolic arterial pressure and the mean transvalvular pressure gradient divided by the stroke volume index. Results: The patients were divided into two groups according to the level of Z va : low Z va (Z va &lt;3mmHg ml/m 2 , n=25) and high Z va (Z va ≥3mmHg ml/m 2 , n=49). GLS was reduced in the high Z va group (p&lt;0.05). The patients in the high Z va group were divided into two subgroups: AS group (n=28) and H-LVH group (n=21). Systolic blood pressure was higher in the H-LVH group than in the AS group (p&lt;0.0001). However, LV mass index and LV ejection fraction were not significantly differences. GLS was significantly reduced in the AS group (p&lt;0.0001). In the AS group, GLS was significantly correlated with Zva (r=0.44). However, there was no correlation between GLS and mean transaortic pressure gradient. Conclusions: Despite of similar global LV afterload and LV hypertrophy, myocardial LV longitudinal systolic function is impaired in patients with severe AS compared with H-LVH patients. However, there is no correlation between AS severity and LV longitudinal deformation. The magnitude of the global LV afterload as reflected by Z va is a powerful determinant of altered LV longitudinal deformation in severe AS patinets with preserved LV ejection fraction.

Association of Thoracic Aorta Calcium Score With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis After Aortic Valve Replacement

Substantial aortic calcification is known to be associated with aortic stiffening and subsequent left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. This study examined whether the thoracic aorta calcium score (TACS) is related to LV hypertrophy and whether it leads to an adverse prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) after aortic valve replacement (AVR). We retrospectively reviewed 47 patients (mean age, 64 ± 11 years) with isolated severe AS who underwent noncontrast computed tomography of the entire thoracic aorta and who received AVR. TACS was quantified using the volume method with values becoming log transformed (log[TACS+1]). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and 1 year after the operation. Preoperative LV mass index (LVMI) displayed significant positive correlations with male gender (r=0.430, p= 0.010) and log(TACS+1) (r= 0.556, p=0.003). In multivariate linear regression analysis, only log(TACS+1) was independently associated with LVMI, even after adjusting for age, gender, transaortic mean pressure gradient, and coronary or valve calcium score. Independent determinants for postoperative LVMI included log(TACS+1) and preoperative LVMI after 1 year of follow-up echocardiography, adjusting for age, gender, indexed effective orifice area, and coronary or valve calcium score. During a median follow-up period of 54 months after AVR, there were 10 events (21%), which included 4 deaths from all-causes, 3 strokes, 2 inpatient admissions for heart failure, and 1 myocardial infarction. The event-free survival rate was significantly lower for patients with TACS of 2,257 mm3 or higher compared with those whose TACS was lower than 2,257 mm3 (log-rank p < 0.001). High TACS was associated with increased LVMI among patients with severe AS. Further, high TACS usefully predicted less regression of LVMI and poor clinical outcomes after AVR. TACS may serve as a useful proxy for predicting LV remodeling andadverse prognosis in patients with severe AS undergoing AVR.

Drug-induced aortic valve stenosis: An under recognized entity

BackgroundWe have been intrigued by the observation that aortic stenosis (AS) may be associated with characteristic features of mitral drug-induced valvular heart disease (DI-VHD) in patients exposed to valvulopathic drugs, thus suggesting that beyond restrictive heart valve regurgitation, valvulopathic drugs may be involved in the pathogenesis of AS. MethodsHerein are reported echocardiographic features, and pathological findings encountered in a series of patients suffering from both AS (mean gradient >15mmHg) and mitral DI-VHD after valvulopathic drugs exposure. History of rheumatic fever, chest radiation therapy, systemic disease or bicuspid aortic valve disease were exclusion criteria. ResultsTwenty-five (19 females, mean age 62years) patients having both AS and typical features of mitral DI-VHD were identified. Mean transaortic pressure gradient was 32+/−13mmHg. Aortic regurgitation was ≥ mild in 24 (96%) but trivial in one. Known history of aortic valve regurgitation following drug initiation prior the development of AS was previously diagnosed in 17 patients (68%). Six patients underwent aortic valve replacement and 3 both aortic and mitral valve replacement. In the 9 patients with pathology analysis, aortic valvular endocardium was markedly thickened by dense non-inflammatory fibrosis, a characteristic feature of DI-VHD. ConclusionThe association between AS and typical mitral DI-VHD after valvulopathic drug exposure may not be fortuitous. Aortic regurgitation was usually associated to AS and preceded AS in most cases but may be lacking. Pathology demonstrated the potential role of valvulopathic drugs in the development of AS.

Valvular performance and aortic regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement using Edwards valve versus CoreValve for severe aortic stenosis: A Meta-analysis

To compare incidence of aortic regurgitation (AR), paravalvular AR and valvular performance with Doppler hemodynamic parameters following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Edwards valve (EV) versus CoreValve (CV). Currently, there are scarce data on post-TAVR echocardiographic outcomes comparing EV and CV. PubMed and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials were searched through May 2015. Twenty studies (n=11,244) comparing TAVR procedure that used EV (n=6445) and CV (n=4799) were included. End points were post-TAVR moderate to severe AR and paravalvular AR, effective orifice area (EOA), mean trans-aortic pressure gradient (MPG), peak trans-aortic pressure gradient (PPG) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The mean difference (MD) or relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed and p<0.05 was considered as a level of significance. Moderate to severe AR and paravalvular AR were significantly lower in EV group (RR: 0.57, CI: 0.52-0.63, p<0.00001 and RR: 0.40, CI: 0.25-0.63, p<0.0001 respectively) compared to CV group. EOA and PPG were not significantly different between EV and CV groups. MPG was significantly lower among patients in CV group (MD: 1.08, CI: 0.05-2.10, p=0.04). LVEF was significantly higher in patients in EV group (MD: 2.26, CI: 0.77-3.74, p=0.03). This study showed CV is associated with higher incidence of post-TAVR moderate to severe paravalvular AR. Echocardiographic valvular performance measures (MPG, LVEF) showed minimal but significant difference, which may not be clinically significant.

0274: Prognostic impact of pulmonary arterial pressure in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

The prognostic impact of pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) remains controversial in aortic stenosis (AS) and few studies focused only on patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We therefore aimed to investigate the impact of PAP, derived from our large catheterization database, on survival in severe AS with preserved LVEF. Between 2000 and 2010, 749 patients (74±8y, 57% of males) with preserved LVEF and severe AS without other valvular heart disease underwent cardiac catheterization, including right heart hemodynamic assessment. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) was defined as mean PAP >25mmHg. Systolic and mean PAP were 34.5±12 and 21.9±9mmHg, respectively. Overall, 29% (n=215) of patients had PH, and these patients were significantly older (p<0.0001), with lower LVEF (p<0.0001) and higher heart rate (p=0.016) than those without PH. In addition, they more frequently had, hypertension (p<0.0001), diabetes (p=0.001), coronary artery disease (CAD, p<0.0001) and chronic pulmonary disease (p=0.043). Aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed in 91% of patients and 30-day mortality was 4.3%, significantly higher in patients with PH (7.7 vs. 3.4%, p=0.014). In logistic regression analysis, after adjustment for age, gender, LVEF, CAD and mean transaortic pressure gradient, mean PAP was an independent predictor of increased 30-day mortality (OR=1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.1, p=0.004). Overall long-term survival was significantly reduced in patients with PH as compared to those without PH (10-year survival: 41±8 vs. 61±3%, p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for all cofactors, PH was an independent predictor of mortality (HR=1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1, p=0.037). In patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF, PAP is an independent predictor of both 30-day and long-term mortality. In order to improve the prognosis of these patients, AVR could be considered before the occurrence of severely elevated PAP.

Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio May Predict the Severity of Calcific Aortic Stenosis

BackgroundPlatelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is an emerging inflammatory indicator which is closely associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the relationship between PLR and the severity of calcific aortic stenosis (AS).Material/MethodsThe study was designed as a retrospective study. A total of 86 consecutive patients with calcific AS were divided into two groups as mild-to-moderate AS and severe AS according to the transaortic mean pressure gradient. PLR levels were calculated from the complete blood count (CBC).ResultsPlatelet to lymphocyte ratio was significantly higher in severe and mild-to-moderate AS groups when compared to the control subjects (151±31.2, p<0.001, 138±28.8 vs. 126±26.5, p=0.008, respectively). In the subgroup analysis of AS patients, PLR was found to be higher in the severe AS group compared to mild-to-moderate group (p<0.001). A significant correlation was found between PLR and transaortic mean pressure gradient in patients with AS (r=0.421, p<0.001).ConclusionsOur study results demonstrated that increased PLR correlates with the severity of calcific AS.

Low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: reclassification of severity by fusion of Doppler and computed tomographic data.

Low gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may be attributed to aortic valve area index (AVAi) underestimation due to the assumption of a circular shape of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) with 2-dimensional echocardiography. The current study evaluated whether fusing Doppler and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) data to calculate AVAi results in significant reclassification of inconsistently graded severe AS. In total, 191 patients with AVAi < 0.6 cm2/m2 and LVEF ≥ 50% (mean age 80 ± 7 years, 48% male) were included in the current analysis. Patients were classified according to flow (stroke volume index <35 or ≥35 mL/m2) and gradient (mean transaortic pressure gradient ≤40 or >40 mmHg) into four groups: normal flow-high gradient (n = 72), low flow-high gradient (n = 31), normal flow-low gradient (n = 46), and low flow-low gradient (n = 42). Left ventricular outflow tract area was measured by planimetry on MDCT and combined with Doppler haemodynamics on continuity equation to obtain the fusion AVAi. The group of patients with normal flow-low gradient had significantly larger AVAi and LVOT area index compared with the other groups. Although MDCT-derived LVOT area index was comparable among the four groups, the fusion AVAi was significantly larger in the normal flow-low gradient group. By using the fusion AVAi, 52% (n = 24) of patients with normal flow-low gradient and 12% (n = 5) of patients with low flow-low gradient would have been reclassified into moderate AS due to AVAi ≥ 0.6 cm2/m2. The fusion AVAi reclassifies 52% of normal flow-low gradient and 12% of low flow-low gradient severe AS into true moderate AS, by providing true cross-sectional LVOT area.