Rate-distortion functions for 2-dimensional homogeneous isotropic images are compared with the performance of five source encoders designed for such images. Both unweighted and frequency weighted mean-square error distortion measures are considered. The coders considered are a) differential pulse code modulation (DPCM) using six previous samples or picture elements (pels) in the prediction--herein called 6-pel DPCM, b) simple DPCM using single-sample prediction, c) 6-pel DPCM followed by entropy coding, d) <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">8 \times 8</tex> discrete cosine transform coding, and e) <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">4 \times 4</tex> Hadamard transform coding. Other transform coders were studied and found to have about the same performance as the two transform coders above. With the mean-square error distortion measure, 6-pel DPCM with entropy coding performed best. Next best was the <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">8 \times 8</tex> discrete cosine transform coder and the 6-pel DPCM--these two had approximately the same distortion. Next were the <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">4 \times 4</tex> Hadamard and simple DPCM, in that order. The relative performance of the coders changed slightly when the distortion measure was frequency weighted mean-square error. From <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">R = 1</tex> to 3 bits/pel, which was the range studied here, the performances of all the coders were separated by only about 4 dB.