While applied frequently in physical biochemistry to the study of protein complexes, thequantitative use of analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) for nanocrystal analysisis relatively rare. Its application in nanoscience is potentially very powerful asit provides a measure of nanocrystal density, size and structure directly in thesolution phase. Towards that end, this paper examines the best practices forapplying data collection and analysis methods for AUC, geared towards the study ofbiomolecules, to the unique problems of nanoparticle analysis. Using uniformnanocrystals of cadmium selenide, we compared several schemes for analyzing rawsedimentation data. Comparable values of the mean sedimentation coefficients (s-value) were found using several popular analytical approaches; however, the distribution in samples-values is best captured using the van Holde–Weischt algorithm. Measureds-values could be reproducibly collected if sample temperature and concentrationwere controlled; under these circumstances, the variability for averagesedimentation values was typically 5%. The full shape of the distribution ins-values, however, is not easily subjected to quantitative interpretation. Moreover, theselection of the appropriate sedimentation speed is crucial for AUC of nanocrystals as thedensity of inorganic nanocrystals is much larger than that of solvents. Quantitative analysisof sedimentation properties will allow for better agreement between experimentaland theoretical models of nanocrystal solution behavior, as well as providingdeeper insight into the hydrodynamic size and solution properties of nanomaterials.
Read full abstract