Patterns of food-niche breadth, food-niche overlap and mean prey weight in the diet are used to characterize and compare the trophic structure of five assemblages of diurnal and nocturnal birds of prey. The localities surveyed are in Michigan, Wisconsin, Utah, Spain and Chile. With few exceptions, no significant differences are demonstrated between sympatric assemblages of hawks and owls in the statistical distributions of raptor weights or of the three trophic estimators above-mentioned. Within each hawk and owl assemblage positive correlations are found between raptor weights and mean prey weights but not between raptor weights and food-niche breadths. Parallel geographic variation of diurnal and nocturnal raptor assemblages is observed in species richness (which is always higher for hawks), sizes and trophic statistics. Mean food-niche breadths within assemblages vary inversely with number of prey categories available per raptor species at a given locality. The trophic structure of sympatric assemblages of hawks and owls is very similar and covaries geographically because they are opportunistic predators that vary their trophic relationships according to the available food resources. INTRODUCTION Local assemblages of hawks and owls have been considered as ecological counterparts that hunt at different times of the day (Grossman and Hamlet, 1964; Craighead and Craighead, 1969). Thus far, this claim has been largely based on qualitative or semiquantitative assessments of feeding patterns of these raptors. In fact, few authors have reported adequate data on the food habits of entire raptorial assemblages (Errington, 1932, 1933; Valverde, 1967; Craighead and Craighead,, 1969; Smith and Murphy, 1973; Jaksic et al., 1981), and they have not usually characterized the trophic relations by means of standard statistics widely used in other dietary studies of birds (e.g., Hespenheide, 1973, 1975; Baltz and Morejohn, 1977; Wiens and Rotenberry, 1979). Standard quantitative estimators of the trophic niche are food-niche breadth (Levins, 1968; Petraitis, 1979), food-niche overlap (Colwell and Futuyma, 1971; Linton et al., 1981) and mean prey size (Storer, 1966; Hespenheide, 1973). Although many researchers have used these trophic estimators to test predictions about species diversity and packing, generalization vs. specialization, character displacement, guild structure, niche partitioning and the like (MacArthur, 1972; Cody, 1974; Pianka, 1974; Cody and Diamond, 1975; May, 1976), only rarely have these statistics been used to describe the trophic ecology of hawk and owl populations (Marti, 1974; Herrera and Hiraldo, 1976; Jaksic et al., 1981). Consequently, almost nothing quantitative is known about the food-niche relations of raptorial assemblages or about their spatial variation. To characterize the trophic structure of hawk and owl assemblages, sympatric diurnal and nocturnal raptors are compared and their geographic variation analyzed. Trophic structure is a shorthand term for the patterns of food-niche breadths, overlaps and prey sizes of sympatric raptor populations. I address the following questions: (a) To what extent is the trophic structure of hawk and owl assemblages similar? (b) Are the trophic statistics reasonably constant properties of given raptorial species or do they vary among localities? I hope that in answering these basic questions background information will be provided for more sophisticated analyses of the modes of predation of hawk and owl assemblages.
Read full abstract