Mean Oxford Elbow Score Research Articles

Failed radial head arthroplasty treated by removal of the implant.

In patients with a failed radial head arthroplasty (RHA), simple removal of the implant is an option. However, there is little information in the literature about the outcome of this procedure. The aim of this study was to review the mid-term clinical and radiological results, and the rate of complications and removal of the implant, in patients whose initial RHA was undertaken acutely for trauma involving the elbow. A total of 11 patients in whom removal of a RHA without reimplantation was undertaken as a revision procedure were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 8.4 years (6 to 11). The range of motion (ROM) and stability of the elbow were recorded. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The functional outcome was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH). Radiological examination included the assessment of heterotopic ossification (HO), implant loosening, capitellar erosion, overlengthening, and osteoarthritis. Complications and the rate of further surgery were also recorded. The indications for removal of the implant were stiffness in five patients, aseptic loosening in five, and pain attributed to the RHA in three. The mean time interval between RHA for trauma to removal was ten months (7 to 21). Preoperatively, three patients had overlengthening of the implant, three had capitellar erosion, six had HO, and four had radiological evidence of loosening. At the final follow-up, the mean the flexion-extension arc improved significantly by 38.2° (95% CI 20 to 59; p = 0.002) and the mean arc of prono-supination improved significantly by 20° (95% CI 0 to 72.5; p = 0.035). The mean pain VAS score improved significantly by 3.5 (95% CI 2 to 5.5; p = 0.004). The mean MEPS improved significantly by 27.5 (95% CI 17.5 to 42.5; p = 0.002). The mean OES improved significantly by 9 (95% CI 2.5 to 14; p = 0.012), and the mean DASH score improved significantly by 23.5 (95% CI 7.5 to 31.6; p = 0.012). Ten patients (91%) had HO and osteoarthritis. Two patients underwent further surgery due to stiffness and pain, respectively. Simple removal of the implant at revision surgery following a failed RHA introduced following trauma provides satisfactory mid-term results with an acceptable risk of complications. Osteoarthritis, instability, and radioulnar impingement were not problems in this series.

Primary Elbow Arthroplasty in the Management of Complex Distal Humerus Fractures.

Introduction Complex distal humerus fractures pose significant challenges in orthopedic surgery, especially when traditional open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is not feasible. Primary elbow arthroplasty has emerged as an alternative treatment option for these fractures, but its application remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes, patient selection criteria, and follow-up results of primary elbow arthroplasty in the management of complex distal humerus fractures. Methods A retrospective review was conducted on 15 patients who underwent primary elbow arthroplasty for Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) type C distal humerus fractures between 2017 and 2023 at our institution. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 years or older who were offered either total elbow or hemiarthroplasty for acute complex distal humerus fracture. Data were collected from patient medical records, including demographic information, fracture classification, surgical details, and postoperative follow-up. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Complications were documented, and descriptive statistics were used to summarise the findings. Results The mean age of the patients was 71.8 years (IQR 17 years), with 12 females and three males. The mean time to surgery was 14.7 days post-injury (IQR: 12 days). The mean follow-up duration was 52 weeks (range: 8-234 weeks, IQR: 27 weeks) and variability was noted. The mean flexion-extension arc at the final follow-up was 93° (IQR: 32.5°). The mean OES was 46 (IQR: 22), and the mean MEPS was 75 (IQR: 37), indicating good to excellent functional outcomes. Scores for two patients were not available due to dementia. Reported complications included one case of ulnar sensory symptoms and one case requiring metalwork removal following olecranon osteotomy. Conclusion Primary elbow arthroplasty provides a viable treatment option for complex distal humerus fractures, demonstrating significant functional improvements and high patient satisfaction. However, the variability in follow-up and subjective decision-making underscores the need for standardized protocols. Future multicenter, prospective studies with larger cohorts and standardized follow-up protocols are recommended to confirm these findings and optimize patient care.

Platelet-rich Plasma versus Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis – A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study

Abstract Introduction: Lateral epicondylitis, commonly known as tennis elbow, is one of the most common chronic disabling painful conditions that affect the forearm’s common extensor tendons. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus corticosteroid injection in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Aims: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of PRP versus corticosteroid injection in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis, focusing on the early response. Settings and Design: This was a prospective randomised controlled study. Materials and Methods: This study was a prospective randomised control trial of 100 patients, clinically diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis in Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital, Hubli. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) using computer-generated random numbers to two groups. Group A received corticosteroid injection. Group B received PRP injection. Outcome assessment was done using the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Patient-rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH). All patients were followed up at regular intervals of 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-injection. Statistical Analysis Used: Using SPSS Statistics version 25 software, statistical analysis was done. Results: Pre–injection, the mean OES, VAS, PRTEE and DASH scores were similar in both the groups with insignificant P value. The mean pre-injection OES, VAS, PRTEE and DASH scores in the corticosteroid group were 11.22, 7.88, 75.950 and 69.364, whereas in the PRP group, it was 10.66, 7.96, 76.170 and 69.466, with P = 0.165, 0.322, 0.834 and 0.869, respectively. At the end of 6 months in the corticosteroid group, the mean score of OES increased from 11.22 ± 1.71 to 38.94 ± 5.17, VAS decreased from 7.88 ± 0.385 to 1.74 ± 1.24, PRTEE decreased from 75.95 ± 4.86 to 24.3 ± 12 and DASH decreased from 69.36 ± 2.90 to 23.31 ± 11.5, with a significant P < 0.005. At the end of 6 months in the PRP group, the mean scores of OES increased from 10.66 ± 2.07 to 45.38 ± 1.41, VAS decreased from 7.96 ± 0.45 to 0.06 ± 0.31, PRTEE decreased from 76.1 ± 5.04 to 7.47 ± 3.16 and DASH decreased from 69.47 ± 3.44 to 7.78 ± 2.65, with a significant P < 0.005. Conclusion: We concluded that patients treated with PRP had significantly reduced pain, increased functional activity, less recurrence and without requirement of any further intervention, outperforming corticosteroid injection effect at the end of 6 months follow up.

Discovery Elbow System arthroplasty polyethylene bearing exchange: outcomes and experience.

The Discovery Elbow System (DES) utilizes a polyethylene bearing within the ulnar component. An exchange bearing requires preoperative freezing and implantation within 2 minutes of freezer removal to allow insertion. We report our outcomes and experience using this technique. This was an analysis of a two-surgeon consecutive series of DES bearing exchange. Inclusion criteria included patients in which exchange was attempted with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Clinical and radiographic review was performed 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 and 10 years postoperative. Outcome measures included range of movement, Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), complications and requirement for revision surgery. Eleven DESs in 10 patients were included. Indications were bearing wear encountered during humeral component revision (n=5); bearing failure (n=4); and infection treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR; n=2). Bearing exchange was conducted on the first attempt in 10 cases. One case required a second attempt. One patient developed infection postoperatively managed with two-stage revision. Mean follow-up of the bearing exchange DES was 3 years. No further surgery was required, with no infection recurrence in DAIR cases. Mean elbow flexion-extension and pronosupination arcs were 107° (±22°) and 140° (±26°). Mean OES was 36/48 (±12) and MEPS was 83/100 (±19). Our results support the use of DES bearing exchange in cases of bearing wear with well-fixed stems or acute infection. This series provides surgeons managing DES arthroplasty with management principles, successful and reproducible surgical techniques and expected clinical outcomes in performing DES polyethylene bearing exchange. Level of evidence: IV.

Midterm outcomes of suture anchor fixation for displaced olecranon fractures.

Displaced olecranon fractures constitute a challenging problem for elbow surgeons. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of suture anchor fixation for treating patients with displaced olecranon fractures. A retrospective review was performed for all consecutive patients with displaced olecranon fractures treated with suture anchor fixation with at least 2 years of clinical follow-up. Surgical repair was performed acutely in all cases with nonmetallic suture anchors in a double-row configuration utilizing suture augmentation via the triceps tendon. Osseous union and perioperative complications were uniformly assessed. Suture anchor fixation was performed on 17 patients with displaced olecranon fractures. Functional outcome scores were collected from 12 patients (70.6%). The mean age at the time of surgery was 65.6 years, and the mean follow-up was 5.6 years. Sixteen of 17 patients (94%) achieved osseous union in an acceptable position. No hardware-related complications or fixation failure occurred. Mean postoperative shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH) score was 3.8±6.9, and mean Oxford Elbow Score was 47.5±1.0, with nine patients (75%) achieving a perfect score. Suture anchor fixation of displaced olecranon fractures resulted in excellent midterm functional outcomes. Additionally, this technique resulted in high rates of osseous union without any hardware-related complications or fixation failures. Level of evidence: IV.

LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP (14 TO 25 YEARS) OF PATIENTS TREATED WITH CLOSED REDUCTION, SPLINTING, AND EARLY MOVEMENT FOR SIMPLE DISLOCATION OF THE ELBOW

We have previously reported on the medium-term outcomes following a non-operative protocol of a short period of splinting followed by early movement to treat simple dislocations of the elbow.We undertook extended follow up of our original patient study group to determine whether the excellent results previously reported were maintained in the very long-term. A secondary question was to determine the rate and need for any late surgical intervention.We attempted to contact all patients in the original patient study group. Patients were requested to complete the Oxford elbow score (OES), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and a validated patient satisfaction questionnaire. Patients were requested to attend a face-to-face assessment where they underwent a clinical examination including neurovascular assessment, range-of-motion and an assessment of ligamentous stability.Seventy-one patients (65%) from the original patient study group agreed to participate in the study.The mean duration of follow-up was 19.3 years. At final follow-up patients reported excellent functional outcome scores and a preserved functional range of movement in the injured elbows. The mean DASH score was 5.22 points and the mean Oxford Elbow Score was 91.6 points. The mean satisfaction score was 90.9 points.Our study shows that the excellent outcomes following treatment with a protocol of a short period of splinting and early movement remain excellent and are maintained into the very long term. These findings support our hypothesis that this treatment protocol is appropriate and suitable for most patients with simple dislocations of the elbow. The role for primary ligamentous repair for this patient group should be carefully considered. Work to more clearly define the anticipated benefits of surgery for specific patient groups or injury patterns would help to support informed decision making.

Mid-term outcome following radial head arthroplasty in acute trauma: risk factors for poor outcome.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a large cohort of a single-type radial head implant in a mid-term follow-up and determine the associated risk factors for an inferior functional outcome. Retrospective follow-up assessment was done for 65 patients (33 women, 32 men; mean age 53.3 years [22 to 81]), who underwent radial head arthroplasty (RHA) for acute trauma between 2012 and 2018, after a minimum follow-up of 3 years. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, as well as the Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), were evaluated, and all radiographs were analyzed. All complications and revision procedures were assessed. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for a poor outcome following RHA. After an average follow-up of 4.1 years (3 to 9.4y), the mean MEPS was 77.2 (SD 18.9), the mean OES was 32.0 (SD 10.6), the mean MMWS was 74.6 (SD 13.7), and the mean DASH score was 29.0 (SD 21.2). The average range of motion (ROM) was 10° (SD 15°) in extension and 125° (SD 14°) in flexion, with 81° (SD 14°) in pronation and 63° (SD 24°) in supination. The overall complication and reoperation rates were 38.5% and 30.8%, with severe elbow stiffness being the most common reason for revision. A patient age>50 years, the use of an external fixator, accompanying MCL injuries, and the development of higher-grade osteoarthritis were associated with a poor outcome. Satisfactory medium-term outcomes can be achieved using a monopolar, long-stemmed RHA in acute trauma. However, complications and revision rates are high, frequently leading to inferior outcome scores. Additionally, a higher patient age, the use of an external fixator, accompanying MCL injuries, and the occurrence of higher-grade osteoarthritis were associated with a poor outcome; these should raise awareness in treating trauma surgeons.

Long-Term Follow-up (14 to 25 Years) Following Closed Reduction and Early Movement for Simple Dislocation of the Elbow.

We have previously reported on the midterm outcomes after a nonoperative protocol to treat simple dislocations of the elbow that included a short period of splinting followed by early movement. We have now performed extended follow-up of the original patient group from the prior study to determine whether the excellent results that previously had been reported were maintained in the long term and also to determine the rate of and need for any late surgical intervention. We attempted to contact all of the patients from the original study group. We requested that they complete the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) survey, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and a validated patient satisfaction questionnaire. Patients also were requested to attend a face-to-face assessment to have a clinical examination that included neurovascular, range-of-motion, and ligamentous stability assessments. Seventy-one patients from the original patient group agreed to participate in the new study. The mean duration of follow-up was 19.3 years. At the time of the final follow-up, patients reported excellent functional outcome scores and a preserved functional range of movement in the injured elbow. The mean OES was 91.6 points, the mean DASH score was 5.22 points, and the mean satisfaction score was 90.9 points. None of the patients had undergone delayed or secondary surgery for instability during the interval period. This study demonstrated that the original excellent outcomes following treatment with a protocol of a short period of splinting and early movement remained excellent and were maintained into the very long term. Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Non-operative management of terrible triad injuries of the elbow; not so terrible?

Terrible triad injuries (TTIs) of the elbow have traditionally been reported to have poor outcomes, hence requiring surgical stabilisation. We identified and reviewed patients with TTIs treated non-operatively within our department. We retrospectively reviewed patients with TTI treated non-operatively with standardised elbow-instability rehabilitation from 2010 to 2020. We used Mason and Morrey classifications for radial head and coronoid fractures, respectively. Non-operative indications included a congruent joint on CT, significant co-morbidities pre-disposing to high-risk surgery and/or patient preference. Outcomes included Oxford Elbow Score (OES), ROM and complications. Nineteen patients were included (mean age 49; 37% female). At an average of 6 years (range 2-11 years) post-treatment, mean OES was 46 ± 7. At last clinic review, mean 6 months (2-15), average ROM was 131 ± 11° flexion, 8 ± 10° extension, 85 ± 12° supination and 85 ± 13° pronation. One patient required arthrolysis and another had an incongruent ulnohumeral joint which developed clicking with a functional ROM. Our report suggests non-operatively managed and appropriately rehabilitated TTI injuries can achieve good function and ROM. We recommend conservative management as a viable option in cases with joint congruency and no mechanical block in patients with significant co-morbidities or those refusing surgery but patients must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

High return to sport rate and good patient-reported outcomes in recreational athletes following simple elbow dislocations

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate outcomes and return to sport metrics in recreational athletes who suffered simple elbow dislocations and were treated operatively or nonoperatively.MethodsThe study included patients between the ages of 16 and 65 who were recreational athletes and had experienced a simple elbow dislocation, with at least 2 years having passed since the injury. Patient-reported outcomes including Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Subjective Elbow Value (SEV), Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were collected. Return to sport metrics were assessed.ResultsA total of 44 patients (21 females, mean age 43.8 years [95% CI, 39.1–48.5]) who were recreational athletes before their injury completed follow-up at mean 7.6 years (95% CI, 6.7–8.5). There were 29 patients (65.9%) who were treated operatively. Mean MEPS was 93.3 (95% CI, 90.2–96.4), mean SEV was 94.9 (95% CI, 91.9–97.9) and mean OES was 43.3 (95% CI, 41.3–45.4). A total of 36 (81.8%) patients returned to their pre-injury sport. Mean time to return to sport was 21.7 (95% CI, 16.8–26.5) weeks. There was a significant difference in OES (P = .019) and SEV (P = .030) that favored the nonoperative group; however, no significant differences for MEPS, VAS, satisfaction, arc of motion and return to sport were present between groups. A total of five (11.4%) complications were observed and one (2.3%) required revision.ConclusionsGood outcomes and a high return to sport rate can be expected in recreational athletes following operative and nonoperative treatment of simple elbow dislocations. However, as many as one-in-five patients may not return to pre-injury sport.

High correlation of the subjective elbow value with Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Oxford Elbow Score in patients with elbow dislocation

The purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation of the Subjective Elbow Value (SEV) with 2 widely used elbow scoring systems: Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Oxford Elbow Score (OES) in patients following elbow dislocation. In this retrospective single-center study, patients who sustained an elbow dislocation between January 2008 and December 2019 and were at least 2 years out from injury were included. SEV, OES and MEPS were assessed and statistical correlation was calculated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. A total of 114 patients (61 male, 53 female) with a mean age of 47.1 years (range, 16-70) were analyzed following elbow dislocation. The mean SEV was 87.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84.2-90.7), mean MEPS was 88.1 (95% CI 85.1-91.0) points and mean OES was 40.0 (95% CI 38.4-41.7) points. Both MEPS (r=0.710, P<.001), and OES (r=0.764, P<.001) demonstrated high correlation with the SEV. This study demonstrates that the SEV is a valid tool to assess overall status of the elbow in patients following elbow dislocations and presents an expressive but easy to perform addition to more complex scoring systems.

Coronoid tip fractures in terrible triad injuries can be safely treated without fixation.

The optimal treatment of terrible triad injuries of the elbow (TTI) remains topic of ongoing discussion. The aim of this study was to determine whether different treatment strategies for coronoid tip fractures in terrible triad injuries influences the clinical and radiological results in a mid-term follow-up. A total of 62 patients with surgical treatment of a TTI including a coronoid tip fracture (37 women, 25 men; mean age, 51years) were available for follow-up assessment after an average of 4.2years (range 24-110months). Thirteen patients had O'Driscoll 1.1 and 49 O'Driscoll 1.2 coronoid fractures, of which 26 were treated with and 36 without fixation. Range of motion, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score as well as grip strength were evaluated. Radiographs were analyzed for all participants. No significant benefit in outcome variables could be detected between patients, whose coronoid had been fixed, compared to patients without fixation of the coronoid. In the coronoid fixation group, patients had mean outcome scores of 81.5 ± SD 19.1 (range 35-100) for MEPS, 31.0 ± SD 12.5 (range 11-48) for OES and 27.7 ± SD 23 (range 0-61) for DASH score, while in the no-fixation group, mean MEPS was 90.8 ± SD 16.5 (range 40-100), mean OES was 39.0 ± SD 10.4 (range 16-48) and mean DASH score was 14.5 ± SD 19.9 (range 0-48). Mean range of motion was 116° ± SD 21° (range 85-140°) versus 124° ± SD 24° (range 80-150°) in extension-flexion and 158° ± SD 23° (range 70-180°) versus 165° ± SD 12° (range 85-180°) in pronation-supination. Overall complication rate was 43.5% and revision rate was 24.2%, with no significant differences between both groups. Suboptimal results were more frequently seen in patients who had degenerative or heterotopic changes on their latest radiograph. Sufficient elbow stability and good outcomes can be achieved in most patients with TTI and coronoid tip fractures. Although some bias in treatment allocation and group heterogeneity cannot be completely omitted, our analysis detected no significant benefit in outcome when the coronoid tip fracture has been fixed compared to patients with non-fixed coronoid tip. Therefore, we would suggest a no-fixation approach for coronoid tip fractures as primary treatment in TTI of the elbow. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Elbow hemiarthroplasty for acute distal humeral fractures and their sequelae: medium- and long-term follow-up of 41 cases.

The earliest distal humeral hemiarthroplasty (or elbow hemiarthroplasty [EHA]) implants, which date back to the late 1940s, were performed in patients with severe elbow joint injuries as an alternative to arthrodesis. After some clinical reports and case studies with a short follow-up, published in the 1990s, a new "anatomically convertible" EHA model was introduced in 2005 and became a common surgical option to treat complex elbow fractures and their sequelae. We describe the mid- and long-term outcomes of EHA performed to treat acute intra-articular fractures or their sequelae. From 2006 to 2017, 51 patients underwent EHA for acute intra-articular fractures or their sequelae. A total number of 41 patients (80.5% female) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years, 24 with acute lesions and 17 with sequelae, were identified retrospectively. Clinical evaluation was according to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score (subjective), and the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) (objective). Radiographic follow-up was with standard radiographs. Mean follow-up was 92.2 months (range, 24-151). Mean patient age at surgery was 62.8 years (range, 45-81). The mean MEPS was 87.1 points, with excellent results in 26 cases, good results in 9 cases, fair in 2, and poor results in 4. The mean DASH score was 15.9 and the mean OES was 40.5, with satisfactory results in 30 cases. Twenty patients experienced complications and 2 required revision surgery. EHA is a valuable surgical option in selected patients with comminuted distal humeral joint fractures that cannot be reconstructed with stable fixation and in those with malunion of the articular surface of the humerus. EHA offers potential advantages, especially in active elderly patients and in those aged less than 70 years. It is essential to achieve joint stability, restoring medial and lateral ligament function besides the integrity of the coronoid process. An intact olecranon surface without signs of degenerative changes is also critical for EHA success. Our mid- and long-term experience with EHA is favorable, with a high proportion of satisfactory results and long survival rates for both lesion types. In selected patients with acute and post-traumatic injuries, EHA is a valuable surgical option.

Hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction internal fixation for intra-articular distal humerus fractures in older patients.

Intra-articular distal humerus fractures in the older population remain a challenge to fix, due to the comminution of fragments and poor bone stock. Recently Elbow Hemiarthroplasty (EHA) has gained popularity to treat these fractures, however no studies exist comparing EHA to Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF). To compare the clinical outcomes of patients over the age of 60 years treated with ORIF or EHA for multi-fragmentary distal humerus fractures. Thirty-six patients (mean age 73 years) treated surgically for a multi-fragmentary intra-articular distal humeral fracture were followed up for a mean duration of thirty-four months (12-73 months). Eighteen patients were treated with ORIF and eighteen with EHA. The groups were matched for fracture type, demographic characteristics and follow up time. Outcome measures collected included Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Visual Analogue pain Score (VAS), range of motion (ROM), complications, re-operations and radiographic outcomes. The quality of ORIF was judged against set radiographic criteria in order to understand the effect of sub-optimal ORIF technique. No significant clinical difference was found between EHA and ORIF in mean OES (42.5 vs 39.6, p = 0.28), mean VAS (0.5 vs 1.7, p = 0.08) or mean flexion-extension arc (123° vs 112°, p = 0.12). There were significantly more complications associated with ORIF compared to EHA (39% vs 6%, p = 0.04). ORIF executed with satisfactory fixation technique had a comparable complication rate compared to EHA (17% vs 6%, p = 0.6). Two ORIF patients required revision to Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA). None of the EHA patients required revision surgery. This study demonstrated similar short-term functional outcomes between EHA and ORIF for the treatment of multi-fragmentary intra-articular distal humeral fractures in patients >60 years of age. Early complications and re-operations were higher in the ORIF group, although this could be related to improper ORIF technique and patient selection.

A New Technique of Fixing Intra-articular Fractures of the Distal Humerus without Exposing the Ulnar Nerve by Posterior Approach.

Distal humerus fractures constitute around 0.2 to 7% of all fractures, 30% of all humerus fractures, most common in young adults, are due to high energy trauma and in old age due to osteoporosis. A common step in all currently available approaches is to identify the ulnar nerve, expose, mobilise, and retract this from its surrounding bed or in situ release. Ulnar neuropathy is either observed immediately after surgery or delayed up to one year after surgery. We are describing a new posterior approach for intra-articular distal humerus fractures, where identification and retraction of the ulnar nerve are not required to fix the intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus, thereby avoiding injury to the ulnar nerve. Seven patients with AO type B and C were treated using our new ulnar nerve-sparing approach between January 2017 and December 2019. Postoperatively, all the patients have been examined for ulnar neuropathy symptoms. We have no ulnar nerve neuropathy either in the post-operative period or at 2 years follow-up (five cases were followed up for 2 years and two patients lost to follow-up after 6 months). At the end of 2 years, the mean range of motion achieved at elbow was 134°. The mean oxford elbow score was 45.2 (42-47). Heterotopic ossification and infection were not found in our cases. Our ulnar nerve-sparing approach for intra-articular fractures of distal third humerus by posterior approach helps in fixing articular fractures of distal humerus without exposing ulnar nerve during surgery without compromising on the exposure of fracture for fixation, thus reducing the chances of ulnar nerve injury and post-operative neuropathy.

Distal biceps repair through a single incision with the use of a knotless cortical button device: Mid-term results.

Distal biceps rupture presents with an increasing incidence and evidence suggests that although a surgical repair is not mandatory, it results in superior functional outcomes when compared to non-operative management. As implant technology has advanced, several devices have been utilised and studied in managing this pathology. We present our single-centre experience with the use of the ToggleLoc Ziploop reattachment device, a knotless cortical button implant, using a single-incision technique. Retrospective series of 70 consecutive distal biceps tendon repairs, at a mean follow-up of 45.6 months after surgery, using a standardised single implant, single-incision technique, and post-operative rehabilitation programme. There was one (1.4%) re-rupture in our patient cohort. The range of motion was complete in all patients except for one patient who had symptomatic heterotopic ossification, causing limitation in pronation. Complications were minor with the commonest being transient neuropraxia of the lateral cutaneous nerve of the forearm. The mean Oxford elbow score was 46.9 out of 48, and the patient global impression of change scale was 7 out of 7 in 77% of cases. Our data support this technique and implant combination when dealing with acute and chronic distal biceps tendon rupture.

Autologous triceps tendon graft for LUCL reconstruction of the elbow: clinical outcome after 7.5years.

The objective of this study was to assess mid- to long-term functional outcomes in patients treated for symptomatic posterolateral instability of the elbow (PLRI) using an autologous ipsilateral triceps tendon as graft. A total of 196 patients were treated with autologous triceps tendon graft for symptomatic PLRI at single orthopedic institution from 2006 to 2013. The surgical treatment contained arthroscopic instability testing, reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) and harvesting autologous ipsilateral triceps tendon as graft. The follow-up outcomes included range of motion (ROM), pain measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and ultrasound to evaluate the integrity of the refixation of the common extensor. A total of 178 patients (female: 73; male: 105) were available for follow-up at a mean of 91months (range 48-144). No patient reported pain at rest; VAS during activity was 1.8 (range 0-5). The ROM decreased slightly compared to preoperative measurements. Flexion decreased significantly from 135.4 to 131.1, though still within the functional arc of motion. All but 13 patients (8.5%) were clinically stable. However, only two patients received a revision of the LUCL reconstruction due to subjective instability. The mean MEPS in the final follow-up was 91.3 (range 73-100). The mean OES was 46.5 (range 39-48). Three patients reported a pain-free clicking of the elbow. No patient complained about donor site morbidity of the ipsilateral triceps tendon. Ultrasound evaluation showed integrity of the common extensors in all patients. LUCL reconstruction using the ipsilateral triceps tendon as graft shows good to excellent mid- to long-term results in the treatment of symptomatic posterolateral elbow joint instability with a low re-instability and complication rate.

Surgical treatment of the radial head is crucial for the outcome in terrible triad injuries of the elbow.

To evaluate the outcomes of terrible triad injuries (TTIs) in mid-term follow-up and determine whether surgical treatment of the radial head influences clinical and radiological outcomes. Follow-up assessment of 88 patients with TTI (48 women, 40 men; mean age 57 years (18 to 82)) was performed after a mean of 4.5 years (2.0 to 9.4). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were evaluated. Radiographs of all patients were analyzed. Fracture types included 13 Mason type I, 16 type II, and 59 type III. Surgical treatment consisted of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in all type II and reconstructable type III fractures, while radial head arthroplasty (RHA) was performed if reconstruction was not possible. At follow-up the mean MEPS was 87.1 (20 to 100); mean OES, 36.9 (6 to 48); and mean DASH score, 18.6 (0 to 90). Mean movement was 118° (30° to 150°) for extension to flexion and 162° (90° to 180°) for pronation to supination. The overall reoperation rate was 24%, with nine ORIF, ten RHA, and two patients without treatment to the radial head needing surgical revision. When treated with RHA, Mason type III fractures exhibited significantly inferior outcomes. Suboptimal results were also identified in patients with degenerative or heterotopic changes on their latest radiograph. In contrast, more favourable outcomes were detected in patients with successful radial head reconstruction after Mason type III fractures. Using a standardized protocol, sufficient elbow stability and good outcomes can be achieved in most TTIs. Although some bias in treatment allocation, with more severe injuries assigned to RHA, cannot be completely omitted, treatment of radial head fractures may have an independent effect on outcome, as patients subjected to RHA showed significantly inferior results compared to those subjected to reconstruction, in terms of elbow function, incidence of arthrosis, and postoperative complications. As RHA showed no apparent advantage in Mason type III injuries between the two treatment groups, we recommend reconstruction, providing stable fixation can be achieved. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1620-1628.

High Risk of Further Surgery After Radial Head Replacement for Unstable Fractures: Longer-term Outcomes at a Minimum Follow-up of 8 Years.

The evidence for treating acute, unreconstructable radial head fractures in unstable elbows with radial head replacement predominantly consists of short- to mid-term follow-up studies with a heterogenous mix of implants and operative techniques. Data on longer-term patient-reported outcomes after radial head replacement is lacking. (1) What proportion of patients undergo revision or implant removal after radial head replacement? (2) At a minimum of 8 years follow-up, what are the patient-reported outcomes (QuickDASH, Oxford Elbow Score, and EuroQol-5D)? (3) What factors are associated with a superior long-term patient-reported outcome, according to the QuickDASH? Between September 1994 and September 2010, we surgically treated 157 patients for acute radial head fractures. We excluded patients where the radial head was excised (n = 21), internally fixed (n = 15), or replaced as a secondary procedure after failed internal fixation (n = 2). A total of 119 patients who underwent radial head replacement surgery for an acute unreconstructable fracture were included, with a mean age of 50 years (range 15 to 93 ± 19 years), and 53% of patients (63) were women. All but two implants were uncemented, loose-fitting, monopolar prostheses, of which 86% (102) were metallic and 14% (17) were silastic. Implants were only cemented if they appeared unstable within the proximal radius. Silastic implants were used in the earlier series and replaced by metallic implants starting in 2000. We reviewed electronic records to document postoperative complications and prosthesis revision and removal. A member of the local research team (THC, CDC) who was not previously involved in patient care contacted patients to confirm complications, reoperations and to obtain long-term patient-reported outcomes scores. Nineteen patients had died at the point of outcome score collection. Of the remaining 100 patients, 80 were contacted (67% of total cohort), at a median of 11 years (range 8 to 24 years) after injury. The primary outcome measure was the QuickDASH score. Of 119 patients, 25% (30) underwent reoperation, with three patients undergoing revision and 27 patients undergoing prosthesis removal at a median of 7 months (range 0 to 125 months). Twenty-one of 30 procedures (70%) occurred within 1 year after implantation. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis demonstrated a cumulative implant survival rate of 71%. In the 80 patients contacted, the mean QuickDASH score was 13 ± 14, the mean Oxford Elbow Score was 43 ± 6, and the median EuroQol-5D score was 0.8 (-0.3 to 1.0). After controlling for covariates, we found that prothesis revision or removal (p = 0.466) and prosthesis type (p = 0.553) were not associated with patient-reported outcome, according to the QuickDASH. The management of acute unreconstructable fractures of the radial head in unstable elbow injuries with radial head replacement has a high risk of reoperation. Patients must be counselled regarding this risk of secondary intervention, of which the peak risk appears to be within 1 year after implantation. Despite this, patients report low disability according to the QuickDASH at a minimum follow-up of 8 years. Level IV, therapeutic study.

Good outcome using anatomically pre-formed buttress plates for anteromedial facet fractures of the coronoid-a retrospective study of twenty-four patients.

The aims of this retrospective study were to describe the characteristics of anteromedial facet fracture of the coronoid (AMFF) and to determine the outcome following surgery using anatomically pre-formed coronoid buttress plates. Twenty-four patients underwent surgery for AMFF, using a pre-formed buttress plate, between 2011 and 2017 (20 men, four women), with a mean age of 47.7years (range, 19-78years) and a mean post-operative follow-up of 3.7years (range, 12-86months). Fracture classification, injury pattern, accompanying injuries, post-operative range of motion, and revision rate were noted. Post-operative radiographs assessed union, arthritic change, and joint articulation. Joint function was quantified using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores. Eleven cases with subtype 2 and 13 cases with a subtype 3 AMFF could be included, of which 15 had an associated rupture of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and nine of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). Post-operatively, all cases went to bone union without secondary elbow instability. The mean post-operative range of motion was 125° (range, 90-140°), mean MEPS was 98, mean OES was 43, and mean DASH score was 7. Five patients required repeat surgery within two years due to a limited range of motion; 90% of patients regained their pre-trauma levels of physical activity. AMFF are challenging injuries, frequently associated with lesions to the collateral ligament complex. Using anatomically pre-formed coronoid plates, excellent functional outcomes can be achieved.