Mean Oswestry Disability Index Scores Research Articles

Clinical and radiographic analysis of expandable versus static lateral lumbar interbody fusion devices with two-year follow-up

Background: Utilization of static and expandable interbody spacers for minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) offers favorable clinical results. However, complications such as implant migration and/or subsidence may occur with a static implant. Expandable devices allow for in situ expansion to optimize fit and mitigate iatrogenic endplate damage during trialing and impaction. This study sought to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of static and expandable spacers following LLIF and report device-related complications. Methods: This study included 29 patients who underwent LLIF with a static spacer and 27 with an expandable spacer; all procedures were combined with supplemental transpedicular posterior fixation. Patient self-assessment forms and radiographic records were used to assess clinical and radiologic outcomes. Results: Mean patient age was 62.3±10.3 years (64% female). One-level surgery was performed in 87.5% of patients, and 12.5% underwent two-level surgery. Results showed no significant differences in blood loss or length of hospital stay (P>0.05). However, operative times differed statistically between static (63.3±37.8 min) and expandable (120.2±59.6 min) groups (P=0.000). Mean visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index scores improved significantly from preoperative to 24-month follow-up in both groups (P Conclusions: LLIF using expandable spacers resulted in similar clinical and radiographic outcomes when compared with using static spacers, and led to a lower subsidence rate.

Outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease in patients under or over 65\xa0years of age

BackgroundOblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) offers the solution to problems of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). However, OLIF technique for degenerative spinal diseases of elderly patients has been rarely reported. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical and radiological results of OLIF technique for degenerative spinal diseases in patients under or over 65 years of age.MethodsSixty-three patients who underwent OLIF procedure were enrolled, including 29 patients who were less than 65 years of age and 34 patients who were over 65 years of age. Fusion rate, change of disc height and lumbar lordotic angle, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), return to daily activity, patient’s satisfaction rate (PSR), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to assess clinical and functional outcomes.ResultsThe mean NRS scores for back and leg pain decreased, respectively, from 4.6 and 5.9 to 2.3 and 1.8 in the group A (less than 65 years) and from 4.5 and 6.8 to 2.6 and 2.2 in the group B (over 65 years) at the final follow-up period. The mean ODI scores improved from 48.4 to 24.0% in the group A and from 46.5 to 25.2% in the group B at the final follow-up period. In both groups, the NRS and ODI scores significantly changed preoperatively to postoperatively (p < 0.001). However, statistical analysis yielded no significant difference in postoperative NRS/ODI scores between two groups. In both groups, the changes in the disc height, segmental lordosis, and fusion rate between the preoperative and postoperative periods were significant. The amount of change between preoperative and postoperative disc height, segmental lordosis, and whole lumbar lordosis demonstrated significant intergroup differences (p < 0.05). Overall perioperative complications occurred in 8 of 29 (27.6%) patients in the group A and in 10 of 34 (29.4%) patients in the group B. In both groups, the major complication incidence was 0 and 3%, respectively.ConclusionAlthough there was the slightly high incidence of complication associated with high rate of co-morbidities in elderly patients, OLIF for degenerative lumbar diseases in elderly patients showed favorable clinical and radiological outcomes.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for dual-segment lower lumbar degenerative disease.

IntroductionTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has been widely used to treat degenerative lumbar diseases. The PIPELINE Access minimally invasive system allows reduction of the trauma to the patient during TLIF.AimTo present our preliminary experience with the minimally invasive TLIF (mTLIF) technique performed on the first 7 patients with dual-segment lower lumbar degenerative disease (DS-LLDD).Material and methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the first 7 patients with spondylolisthesis and foraminal stenosis operated upon between January 2011 and June 2013. All 7 patients underwent fusion at the L4-S1 level.ResultsThe pedicle screws entered the spinal canal in 2 patients. No other intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred with the mTLIF technique. Improvement of the leading symptom in the early postoperative period (sciatica: 7/7, low back pain: 7/7) was achieved in all patients. The mean improvements in the visual analog scale scores for low back and leg pain were 5.1 and 5.7 points, respectively. The mean Oswestry Disability Index scores were 52% (range: 20–74%) before surgery and 27% (range: 10–48%) at the 3-month follow-up (mean improvement: 25%). The average hospital stay was reduced to 6 days.ConclusionsOur initial experience suggests that the mTLIF technique is a viable method for treating DS-LLDD. Nevertheless, longer observations on larger groups of patients are needed to reliably evaluate the safety of the method and sustainability of the results.

Image guidance in transdiscal fixation for high-grade spondylolisthesis in adults with correct spinal balance.

OBJECTIVE Spondylolisthesis is a prevalent spine disease that recent studies estimate could be detected in 9% of the population. High-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS), however, is much less frequent, which makes it difficult to develop a general recommendation for its treatment. Posterior transdiscal fixation was proposed in 1994 for HGS, and the use of spine navigation could make this technique more accessible and reduce the morbidity associated with the procedure. The purpose of this study was to present a case series involving adult patients with HGS and correct spinal alignment who were treated with transdiscal pedicle screw placement guided with neuronavigation and compare the results to those achieved previously without image guidance. METHODS The authors reviewed all cases in which adult patients with correct spinal alignment were treated for HGS with posterior transdiscal instrumentation placement guided with navigation between 2014 and 2016 at their institution. The authors compared preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic parameters on standing radiographs as well as Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low-back pain. Follow-up CT and MRI studies and postoperative radiographs were evaluated to identify any screw malplacement or instrumentation failure. Any other intraoperative or postoperative complications were also recorded. RESULTS Eight patients underwent posterior transdiscal navigated instrumentation placement during this period, with a mean duration of follow-up of 16 months (range 9-24 months). Six of the patients presented with Meyerding grade III spondylolisthesis and 2 with Meyerding grade IV. In 5 cases, L4-S1 instrumentation was placed, while in the other 3 cases, surgery consisted of transdiscal L5-S1 fixation. There was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic parameters. However, there was a statistically significant improvement in the mean VAS score for low-back pain (6.5 ± 1.5 vs 4 ± 1.7) and the mean ODI score (49.2 ± 19.4 vs 37.7 ± 22) (p = 0.01 and p = 0.012, respectively). Six patients reduced their use of pain medication. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications during the hospital stay, and as of the most recent follow-up, no complications related to pseudarthrosis or hardware failure had been observed. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with posterior transdiscal pedicle screws with in situ fusion achieved good clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with HGS and good sagittal spinal balance. The use of navigation and image guidance was associated with improved results in this technique, including a reduction in postoperative and intraoperative complications related to screw malplacement, pseudarthrosis, and instrumentation failure.

Does the severity of pain correlate with severity of functional disability? Factors influencing 'patient reported outcome measures' in spinal patients.

Aims: To assess correlation between the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and which patient factors can influence patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This study also aims to assess the response to the sexual function question of the ODI.Methods: Retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive patients undergoing a range of different lumbar spinal procedures between July 2012 and September 2015 was performed. Subgroup analysis was also performed on the 122 patients who underwent microdiscectomy and/or decompression procedures only. Data from notes and clinical letters from the patient's first clinic appointment were collected. In addition to these outcome measures, data were also extracted regarding patients' gender, age, smoking status, alcohol use, employment and mental health status.Results: Significant correlation was found between VAS pain score and ODI (p = 0.002) and between VAS pain score and question 1 of ODI (p = 0.0001). A lower ODI score was reported at time of surgery by those in employment compared to those who are unemployed (p = 0.008). In addition to this, a lower ODI score was reported in those who are self-employed compared to those in employment (p = 0.048) in both cohorts. A significantly higher mean ODI score was shown within the subgroup analysis for current smokers (p = 0.02). None of the other patient factors that were analysed were found to affect PROMs. 65% of patients answered the sexual function question of the ODI.Conclusions: Significant correlation was demonstrated between VAS pain score and ODI. Those who are in employment are far more likely to report a lower ODI score than those who are unemployed at the time of surgery. Self-employed patients were found to have reported a significantly lower ODI score than those who are in employment. Smoking cessation should be encouraged as those who are current smokers may be more likely to report a higher ODI. As 65% of patients decided to answer the sexual function question of the ODI, this supports its further use.

Association between sarcopenia and low back pain in local residents prospective cohort study from the GAINA study

BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is one of the most common ailments that people experience in their lifetime. On the other hands, Sarcopenia also leads to several physical symptoms and contributes to reducing the quality of life of elderly people.The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between sarcopenia and low back pain among the general population.MethodsThe subjects included 216 adults (79 men and 137 women; mean age, 73.5 years) undergoing a general medical examination in Hino, Japan. Skeletal muscle index (SMI), The percentage of young adults’ mean (%YAM) of the calcaneal bone mass using with quantitative ultrasound (QUS) method and walking speed were measured, and subjects who met the criteria of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia were assigned to the sarcopenia group. Subjects with decreased muscle mass only were assigned to the pre-sarcopenia group, and all other subjects were assigned to the normal group. Then, we compared the correlations with low back pain physical finding. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the low back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) were used as indices of low back pain. Statistical analysis was performed among three groups with respect their characteristic, demographics, data of sarcopenia determining factor, VAS and ODI. We also analysed prevalence of LBP and sarcopenia. We investigated the correlations between ODI and the sarcopenia-determining factors of walking speed, muscle mass and grip strength.ResultsSarcopenia was noted in 12 subjects (5.5%). The pre-sarcopenia group included 38 subjects (17.6%), and the normal group included 166 subjects (76.9%). The mean ODI score was significantly higher in the sarcopenia group (25.2% ± 12.3%; P < 0.05) than in the pre-sarcopenia group (11.2% ± 10.0%) and the normal group (11.9% ± 12.3%). %YAM and BMI were significantly lower in the sarcopenia group than in other groups (P < 0.05). A negative correlation existed between walking speed and ODI (r = −0.32, P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe results of this study suggested that decreased physical ability due to quality of life in residents with LBP may be related to sarcopenia.

Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane Improves Clinical Outcomes Following Microdiscectomy.

Prospective, randomized controlled trial. To compare pain, physical/mental functional recovery and recurrent herniation for patients following lumbar microdiscectomy with and without the use of a cryopreserved amniotic tissue graft. Although microdiscectomy procedures are routinely successful for patients with lumbar radiculopathy due to herniated disc disease, residual low back pain, and recurrent herniation remain unsolved clinical problems. Following Investigated Review Board approval, 80 subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either receive cryopreserved amniotic (cAM) tissue or no tissue following elective lumbar microdiscectomy surgery. cAM grafts were applied to the annular defect at the conclusion of the procedure. Patients provided preoperative and postoperative clinical assessment data out to 24 months using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-12 (SF-12) Health Survey, and Visual Analog Pain Scale for back and leg pain. Patients with symptomatic recurrent disc herniation were recorded. In total, 48 males and 32 females with an average age of 47.2 years were included. Mean ODI scores for subjects treated with cAM graft demonstrated statistically greater improvement at 6 weeks (14.49 vs. 21.82; P=0.05) and 24 months (6.62 vs. 14.40; P=0.02) compared with controls. Similarly, SF-12 Physical Component Scores demonstrated statistically greater gains in the cAM group at both the 6 weeks and 24 months. None of the subjects in the cAM graft group sustained a recurrent herniation at the same surgical level, whereas 3 patients in the control group sustained a recurrent herniation at the same surgical level, with 2 requiring fusion to manage persistent pain. The data demonstrate statistically superior clinical outcomes following lumbar microdiscectomy as measured by ODI and SF-12 (physical composite scale) and a lower rate of recurrent herniation with the use of a cAM tissue graft compared with traditional microdiscectomy.

Open vs. Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion for Thoracolumbar Traumatic A3 and A4 AO Fractures - 18-Months Follow-Up

Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of the percutaneous screw fixation (PSF) and the open pedicle screw fixation (OPSF) on thoracolumbar (TL) fracture. Methods Sixty-four adult patients with TL vertebral fractures who underwent open or percutaneous posterior short-segment transpedicular screw fixation between January of 2013 and September of 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent clinical, radiological and quality of life follow-up for at least 18 months. Results There was no significant difference in age, gender, time between injury and surgery, and preoperative percentage of anterior column height, preoperative sagittal regional Cobb angle, or kyphotic angle of fractured vertebra between these two groups (p &gt; 0.05). There was significantly less intraoperative blood loss in the PSF (87.6 ± 24.6 mL) than in the OPSF group (271.4 ± 142.6 mL) (p &lt; 0.05). The mean surgery time was 62 minutes (range 42–130 minutes) for open and 58 minutes (range 35 to 128 minutes) for percutaneous screw fixation. The surgery time was shorter in the PSF group, but with no statistical significance (p &gt; 0.05). The mean Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores after 18-months were 23.12 ± 8.2 for the PSF and 24.12 ± 9.2 for the OPSF group, without any statistical significance (p &gt; 0.05). Conclusion Both open and percutaneous screw fixations are safe and effective. The percutaneous techniques significantly reduced the intraoperative blood loss compared with the open techniques.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using a Combination of Hydroxyapatite and Demineralized Bone Matrix and Autografts for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

Study DesignProspective, cohort, non-inferiority study.PurposeThis study evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of interbody fusion using a combination of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and hydroxyapatite (HA).Overview of LiteratureThe use of autografts remains a gold standard in lumbar interbody fusion, but the limited availability and donor site morbidity encourages the use of bone substitutes. In addition to autografts, a combination of HA and DBM is being increasingly use for lumbar interbody fusion. However, there are no data on the clinical and radiological outcomes of this procedure.MethodsWe examined 35 patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent transforaminal interbody fusion. Autografts were used in 18 patients, and 17 patients received a combination of HA and DBM. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Fusion was evaluated using computed tomography images obtained at 12 months postoperatively.ResultsThe mean ODI, JOA, and back and leg pain VAS scores increased significantly in both groups. However, the VAS, JOA, and ODI scores did not differ significantly between the two groups (p=0.599, p=0.543, and p=0.780, respectively). The fusion rates at 1 year postoperatively were 77.8% and 76.5% in the autograft and HA+DBM groups, respectively (p=0.99).ConclusionsThe clinical and radiological outcomes of using a combination of HA and DBM in lumbar interbody fusion were not inferior to those of using autografts. A combination of HA and DBM can be considered as an alternative in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis requiring surgery.

Multidimensional long-term outcome analysis after single-level lumbar microdiscectomy: a retrospective single-centre study.

To present multidimensional long-term results after mono-segmental microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in a large adult cohort treated at a tertiary care centre. Retrospective study design with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire employed at follow-up. All patients undergoing surgical treatment for single-level LDH between 2003 and 2009 were identified. Electronic patient records and imaging data were analysed. A total of 939 patients underwent single-level lumbar MD at our institution. Three hundred and seven complete ODI forms (32.7%) were returned at a median follow-up of 48months. Mean ODI score was 24.04, and mean age was 58years. Females reported slightly higher ODI scores (25.52 vs. 22.68). Age and ODI score showed statistically significant correlation. Early surgery yielded lower ODI scores with patients faring significantly worse if symptoms persisted for a year or longer (one-way ANOVA, p<0.001). ODI scores increased sharply even among those operated later than 1week after symptom onset. Sequestered herniations were associated with significantly lower ODI scores than contained discs on MRI (21.96 vs. 39.89). Surgical complications occurred in 17 cases (5.6%), 82 patients (26.7%) required additional surgery, 58 (18.9%) of those for recurrent disc herniations. Our findings suggest better outcomes with early surgical treatments. Time limits for conservative treatments should be set to avoid the chronification of pain and the worse overall outcomes that go along with belated surgery. Particularly in those with acute onset of pain, sequestered herniations and only mild degrees of immobilization good outcomes are common and surgical treatment appears best if indicated early.

Surgical outcomes in the elderly with degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative study between patients over 80 years of age and under 80 years—a gender-, diagnosis-, and surgical method-matched two-cohort analyses

BackgroundIn Taiwan, the current life expectancy of an 80-year-old man is 88.4 years and that of an 80-year-old is woman is 89.8 years. Surgical candidates older than 80 years usually ask surgeons whether it would be safe for them to undergo surgery. PurposeThe objectives of this study were to report the surgical outcomes of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis who were older than 80 years and underwent instrumented surgeries and to compare these data with the outcomes of patients aged 65–79 years. Study Design/SettingThis is a retrospective study. Patient SampleThe study included 76 patients. Outcome MeasuresThe preoperative medical condition was reviewed using the weighted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and back pain. Plain radiographs were used to assess the fusion status, implant-related complications, and the prevalence of osteoporotic compression fractures (OVFx). Materials and MethodsThe study comprised patients older than 80 years, and the control group comprised patients aged 65–79 years. The two cohorts were matched for gender, main diagnosis, and surgical method. ResultsIn total, 76 patients were included in the study. The study group had 38 patients with a mean age of 82.4 years (80–93 years); the control group also had 38 patients with a mean age of 70.8 years (65–79 years). The study group had a significantly higher ASA classification (2.94 vs. 2.76, p=.040) and CCI score (1.84 vs. 1.13, p=.012). The study group had a higher prevalence of preoperative OVFx (10.5% vs. 2.6%, p=.116) and incidence of new-onset OVFx (13.2% vs. 2.6%, p=.089). The study group had longer operative times (204.6 vs. 179.1 minutes, p=.052) with more blood loss (606.5 vs. 525.8 mL, p=.512), but this finding was not statistically significant. The mean ODI and VAS scores were similar between the two groups. The bone union rate was superior in the control group (81.6% vs. 89.5%, p=.328). ConclusionsPatients older than 80 years have a higher osteoporotic status and comorbidities, which may lead to longer operative times and greater blood loss, with poorer radiographic outcomes. However, the clinical results were not affected. With appropriate patient selection, the age of >80 years is not a negative predictive factor for instrumented surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Radiological and clinical long-term results of heterotopic ossification following lumbar total disc replacement

BackgroundThe long-term results of heterotopic ossification (HO) following lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) and the corresponding clinical and radiological outcomes are unclear. PurposeThis study aimed to report the long-term results of HO following lumbar TDR and to analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes. Study Design/SettingA retrospective case review was performed for the consecutive patients who underwent lumbar TDR. Patient SampleThe study included 48 patients (60 segments) who underwent lumbar TDR. Outcome MeasuresThe time and location of HO development, segmental range of motion (ROM) of index level, the visual analog scale (VAS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were analyzed. MethodsForty-eight patients (60 segments) were divided into HO and non-HO groups, and radiographs were used to measure the time and location of HO development. We compared segmental ROM between two groups using flexion-extension radiographs. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the VAS and the ODI. Furthermore, the segmental ROM, VAS, and ODI scores of each HO class were compared with those of the non-HO group. ResultsThe mean follow-up duration was 104.4 months. Heterotopic ossification was detected in 30 of 60 segments following lumbar TDR, and HO progression was noted in six segments. The mean segmental ROM was significantly lower in the HO group than in the non-HO group. The mean VAS and ODI scores were not significantly different between the two groups. Segmental ROM was significantly lower in the class III and IV of the HO group than in the non-HO group. The VAS and ODI scores were not significantly different among the different classes. ConclusionsWe found that the incidence of HO is the highest within 12 months after lumbar TDR, and the incidence might increase 5 years after surgery. Furthermore, HO progressed over time. Segmental ROM was decreased in the HO groups; however, the limitation in motion might have little clinical influence.

A preliminary analysis of outcomes and end range procedures used to achieve centralization in people with low back pain

Objectives: To investigate the relationship between clinical outcome and the types of end range procedures used to achieve centralization in a sample of patients with low back pain (LBP) and/or peripheral symptoms.Methods: Small sample retrospective analysis of an observational cohort. Patients with LBP who centralized during initial visit at two physical therapy clinics were recruited to participate. The types of end range procedures used to achieve centralization were documented during each office visit and a chart review was performed after 4 weeks. Outcomes were determined by improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score after 4 weeks. Statistical analysis determined the association between the types of end range procedures and outcomes.Results: Thirty-one patients gave consent to participate. Nineteen patients met inclusion criteria and were included in data analysis. After 4 weeks, the improvement in mean ODI scores was 15.89 ± 16.28. Differing end range procedures were used to achieve centralization within this cohort. The types of end range procedures used to achieve centralization were not significantly associated with outcomes.Discussion: The results observed in this study promote exhausting many different types of end range procedures to determine if centralization can be achieved. Limiting the end range procedures used to assess centralization may fail to identify patients who can achieve centralization and subsequently have positive clinical outcomes. Larger cohort studies investigating relationships between outcomes and the types of end range procedures used to achieve centralization would contribute to management of people with LBP.Level of Evidence: 4.

Evaluation of an advanced-practice physiotherapist in triaging patients with lumbar spine pain: surgeon–physiotherapist level of agreement and patient satisfaction

Surgery for lumbar spine pain is indicated for specific etiologies. Given the majority of individuals referred to spine surgeons are not surgical candidates, care delivery is inefficient, with consultations being of limited value for most. Using specially trained physiotherapists in triage is a human resource strategy that may optimize surgeons' time and the patient experience. An advanced-practice physiotherapist (APP) and a surgeon assessed consecutive patients with lumbar spine pain presenting at an academic health centre's spine surgery clinic. The second assessor was blinded to the outcome of the first. We used the κ statistic to evaluate surgeon-APP level of chance-corrected agreement concerning patients' need for a surgical consultation. To assess satisfaction with the APP, patients completed a modified version of the validated Visit-specific Questionnaire. The sample included 102 participants (54 women) with a mean age of 54.3 ± 14.3 years and a mean Oswestry Disability Index score of 35.4 ± 16.6. The assessors' overall agreement was 86%. The κ coefficient for the need for a surgical consultation was 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.54-0.84). The APP identified that 77% of patients did not require a surgical consultation. Twenty-one patients underwent surgery. Satisfaction scores for the APP were very high (mean score 92 out of 100). In triaging patients with lumbar spine pain, the APP and surgeon had a high level of agreement. An APP performing triage at a surgical centre can effectively reduce wait lists by 70%, reserving surgical consultations for those patients in whom they are indicated.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal endoscopic discectomy-assisted oblique lumbar interbody fusion: preliminary results.

OBJECTIVE Direct neural decompression cannot be achieved by performing lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). To overcome the indirect decompressive effect of LLIF, additional endoscopic discectomy with oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) has been attempted. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent OLIF with additional endoscopic discectomy. METHODS Spinal endoscopic discectomy-assisted OLIF was attempted to remove herniated disc material. Only patients with a follow-up time that exceeded 12 months were enrolled. Clinical parameters examined were the Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale scores of back and leg pain. Postoperative MRI was also performed. RESULTS Fourteen patients were enrolled. Central and foraminal disc herniations were evident in 8 and 6 patients, respectively. Concomitant central or foraminal herniated discs were removed completely after additional endoscopic discectomy, and disc removal was confirmed by postoperative MRI. Mean preoperative visual analog scale scores and Oswestry Disability Index scores improved postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS OLIF with additional endoscopic discectomy results in successful direct neural decompression without posterior decompressive procedures. Endoscopic assistance might overcome the limitations of LLIF.

Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive "rocking" technique.

OBJECTIVE Different surgical approaches have been described for treatment of spondylolisthesis, including in situ fusions, reductions of various degrees, and inclusion of healthy adjacent segments into the fusion construct. To the authors' knowledge, there are only sparse reports describing consistent complete reduction and monosegmental transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis using a minimally invasive technique. The authors assess the efficacy of this technique in the reduction of local deformity and correction of overall sagittal profile in single-level spondylolisthesis. METHODS This cohort study consists of a total of 36 consecutive patients treated over a period of 6 years. Patients with varying grades of lumbar spondylolisthesis (29 Meyerding Grade II and 7 Meyerding Grade III) were treated with operative reduction via minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in which the "rocking" technique was used. The clinical outcomes were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Revised Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for low-back pain/dysfunction. Meyerding grade, pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), disc space angle (DSA), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were assessed to measure the radiological outcomes. These were reviewed for each patient for a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS At most recent follow-up, 94% of patients were pain free. There were 2 patients (6%) who had moderate pain (which corresponded to higher-grade of listhesis), but all showed an improvement in pain scores (p < 0.05). The mean VAS score improved from 6.5 (SD 1.5) preoperatively to 1.6 (SD 1.3) and the mean ODI score improved from 53.7 (SD 13.1) preoperatively to 22.5 (SD 15.5) at 2-year follow-up. All radiological parameters improved following surgery. Most significant improvement was noted for LL, DSA, and SS. Both LL and SS were found to decrease, while DSA increased postoperatively. PI remained relatively unchanged, while PT showed a mild increase, which was not significant. Good fusion was achieved with implants in situ at 2-year follow-up. A 100% complete reduction of all grades of spondylolisthesis was achieved. The overall sagittal profile improved dramatically. No major perioperative complications were encountered. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive monosegmental TLIF for spondylolisthesis reduction using this rocking technique is effective in the treatment of various grades of spondylolisthesis. Consistent complete reduction of the slippage as well as excellent correction of overall sagittal profile can be achieved, and the need for including healthy adjacent segments in the fusion construct can be avoided.

Clinical Outcome and Postoperative CT Measurements of Microendoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

This was a retrospective case series. To retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcome of microendoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) including an evaluation of the extent of decompression using computed tomography. Microendoscopic decompression has been a widely applied procedure to treat LSS with satisfactory outcomes and comparatively fewer complications and revision. However, few reports showed computed tomography (CT) measurements of the lumbar spine to assess the postoperative decompression. This study included 103 patients (55 males and 48 females; mean age, 69 y) who underwent microendoscopic decompression for treatment of LSS between January 2009 and January 2011. All patients underwent preoperative CT and postoperative CT at 6 months and 2 years of follow-up to measure the vertebral canal area and the sagittal diameter of the lateral recess at the outer rim. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Visual Analogue Scale were used to evaluate clinical efficacy. The mean vertebral canal area and sagittal diameter of the lateral recess were significantly larger at 6 months and 2 years after surgery compared with 1 day before surgery (P<0.001). The mean JOA scale scores were significantly higher at 6 and 24 months following surgery compared with before surgery (P<0.001). The mean Oswestry Disability Index scores and Visual Analogue Scale scores at 6 months and 2 years after surgery were significantly lower compared with before surgery (both P<0.001). The mean JOA recovery rates at 6 months and 2 years of follow-up were 61% and 64.3%, respectively. The results confirm that microendoscopic decompression for LSS is safe and effective. This study is one of the first to obtain CT measurements of the lumbar spine to assess the postoperative decompression of this procedure.

A Multicenter Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following High-grade Spondylolisthesis Reduction and Fusion.

A retrospective review of the clinical and radiographic outcomes from a multicenter study of surgical treatment for high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) in adults. The objective was to assess the safety of surgical reduction, its ability to correct regional deformity, and its clinical effectiveness. Retrospective, multicenter review of adults (age above 18 y) with lumbosacral HGS (Meyerding grade 3-5) treated surgically with open decompression, attempted reduction, posterior instrumentation, and interbody fusion. Preoperative and postoperative assessment of the Meyerding grade, slip angle, and sacral inclination were performed based on standing radiographs. Preoperative visual analog scale scores were compared with those at the mean follow-up period. Prolo and Oswestry Disability Index scores at most recent follow-up were assessed. A total of 25 patients, aged 19-72 years, met inclusion criteria. Seventeen interbody cages were placed, including 15 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions, 1 posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and 1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Five patients required sacral dome osteotomies. The average follow-up was 21.3 months.At most recent follow-up there was a statistically significant improvement in both the Meyerding grade and the slip angle (P<0.05). There was 1 intraoperative complication resulting in a neurological deficit (4%) and 1 intraoperative vertebral body fracture (4%). No additional surgery was required for any of these patients. There were no cases of nonunion or device failure except for 1 patient who suffered an unrelated traumatic injury 1 year after surgery. The mean Oswestry Disability Index and Prolo scores at mean follow-up of 21.3 months were 20% (minimum disability) and 8.2 (grade 1), respectively. The present study suggests that reduction, when accomplished in conjunction with wide neural element decompression and instrumented arthrodesis, is safe, effective, and durable with low rates of neurological injury, favorable clinical results, and high-fusion rates.

Clinical and radiological outcomes after decompression and posterior fusion in patients with degenerative scoliosis

Objective: The prevalence of degenerative scoliosis (DS) increases with age and an overall increase is seen due to the aging population. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes after decompression and posterior fusion in patients with DS.Methods: In this is prospective study, 43 patients with DS, aged 37 to 70 years, were eligible to undergo decompression and posterior fusion. Primary outcomes were low back pain (LBP) with or without radicular pain, which was evaluated preoperatively and at 12 and 24 months after surgery with the use of a visual analog scale (VAS), and the quality of life (QOL), which was assessed at the same time periods by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire. The Cobb's method was used to measure the degree of scoliosis in each patient preoperatively and at 24 hours, 12 and 24 months after the surgery.Results: VAS scores improved significantly from a mean of 8.18 preoperatively to 4.48 at 12 months and 3.07 at 24 months postoperatively (P < .001). The mean radicular pain scores also decreased significantly (P < .001). At postoperative 12 months, the mean ODI score was significantly lower than the mean preoperative ODI score (47.81 ± 16.06 vs. 72.18 ± 12.28; P = .001). ODI score at 24 months postoperatively was significantly better than the preoperative ODI (15.53 ± 7.21 vs. 72.18 ± 12.28; P = .016). The mean Cobb angle changed significantly from 31.4° ± 4.88 preoperatively to 3.28° ± 2.10 at 24 months postoperatively (P < .001).Conclusions: Our findings suggest that decompression and posterior fusion in the patients with DS is an effective surgical method which is associated with satisfying clinical results in terms of improvement of postoperative LBP, radicular pain, and QOL, and correction of Cobb angle at 12 and 24 months after the surgery and restoration of sagittal alignment at 2 months postoperatively.

Multicenter clinical and imaging evaluation of targeted radiofrequency ablation (t-RFA) and cement augmentation of neoplastic vertebral lesions

BackgroundTreatment of spinal metastatic lesions by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) before cementation can potentially help in local tumor control and pain relief. This is often limited by access and tumor location....